RESUMO
Fulranumab, an anti-human nerve growth factor antibody, was evaluated in a series of nonclinical toxicology studies. No treatment effects were observed in adolescent cynomolgus monkeys in standard design, repeat-dose toxicology studies of up to 6 months. Adverse effects on the developing nervous system were observed in offspring of pregnant cynomolgus monkeys treated with fulranumab. Subsequent studies including detailed morphologic investigations of the nervous system did reveal fulranumab-related changes in adult cynomolgus monkeys; this article is focused on those findings. A single dose of ≥1 mg/kg fulranumab administered subcutaneously (SC) caused a decrease in neuron and sympathetic ganglion size (superior cervical ganglion), observed morphologically and stereologically, with a resulting appearance of increased glial cell density. Similar results were observed in repeat-dose (15 to 52 weeks) toxicity studies at ≤50 mg/kg/wk fulranumab SC. These effects recovered after a 3-month treatment-free period. Fulranumab did not cause any neuronal death, necrosis, apoptosis, or any apparent decrease in function of sympathetic neurons/ganglia at any time point examined. A no observed effect level (NOEL) was established at 0.25 mg/kg fulranumab SC every 4 weeks for 28 weeks.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/toxicidade , Fator de Crescimento Neural/antagonistas & inibidores , Animais , Sistema Nervoso Central/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Macaca fascicularis , Masculino , Neurônios/efeitos dos fármacos , Nível de Efeito Adverso não Observado , Sistema Nervoso Periférico/efeitos dos fármacos , Gravidez , Testes de Toxicidade CrônicaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fulranumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against nerve growth factor (NGF), for pain relief in patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS). METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind study, adults with IC/BPS (i.e., interstitial cystitis symptom index [ICSI] total score ≥8) accompanied by chronic, moderate-to-severe pain were randomized to fulranumab 9 mg or matching placebo, administered subcutaneously at weeks 1, 5, and 9. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to study endpoint (week 12 or at withdrawal) in average daily pain intensity score. Key secondary endpoints included change from baseline to study endpoint in worst pain intensity score, ICSI total score, Pelvic Pain and Urgency/Frequency total score, Patient Perception of Bladder Condition score, and global response assessment. RESULTS: This study was terminated prematurely based on concern that this class may be associated with rapidly progressing osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis. Thirty-one patients (of the targeted 70 patients) were randomized, 17 to placebo and 14 to fulranumab, with 15 and 10 patients, respectively, receiving all 3 doses of double-blind treatment. In ANOVA analyses, there was no statistically significant difference between treatment groups for the primary endpoint (LS mean difference [95% CI] vs. placebo, -0.2 [-1.52, 1.10]) or any of the secondary endpoints. Fulranumab was well tolerated, with no patient discontinuing due to an adverse event or experiencing a joint-related serious adverse event over a 26-week follow-up period. No events related to the neurologic or motor systems were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy was not demonstrated in the present study with the single dose tested and a limited sample size, leading to lack of statistical power. These findings do not exclude the possibility that fulranumab would provide clinical benefit in a larger study and/or specific populations (phenotypes) in this difficult to treat pain condition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01060254 , registered January 29, 2010.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Cistite Intersticial/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Reports of serious joint adverse events (AEs) due to osteonecrosis were noted during randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials of monoclonal antibodies to nerve growth factor (NGF), including tanezumab and fulranumab. METHODS: All available medical records from subjects with reported cases of osteonecrosis, as well as records of subjects who underwent joint replacement during these studies, were reviewed by an independent adjudication committee that was established by each company; the committees were different for each company and included distinct individual experts. Cases were categorized as having definite osteonecrosis, normal or rapid progression of osteoarthritis (OA), another diagnosis or unable to determine the underlying diagnosis. RESULTS: The vast majority of investigator reported cases of osteonecrosis were adjudicated as either normal or rapid progression of OA. Indeed, the syndrome of rapid progression of OA associated with chondrolysis and bone destruction appears to be a safety signal that is associated with not only increasing doses of anti-NGF antibodies but also concomitant therapy with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. CONCLUSIONS: These results have implications for future clinical trials of anti-NGF agents in OA and other painful conditions.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Artropatias/induzido quimicamente , Fator de Crescimento Neural/antagonistas & inibidores , Osteonecrose/induzido quimicamente , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , HumanosRESUMO
Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of fulranumab as adjunct or monotherapy in patients with knee or hip pain related to moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis.Methods: Osteoarthritic patients (aged ≥18 years) from four phase 3 randomized, double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled studies were randomized to receive placebo, fulranumab 1 mg every 4 weeks (Q4wk), or 3 mg Q4wk in 16-week DB phase, followed by a 52-week post-treatment follow-up phase. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and neurological, sympathetic, and joint-related events of interest. Efficacy assessments included pain and physical function sub-scales of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores.Results: Of 245 patients from the ITT set (median age = 64 years; 62% women), 84 (34%) completed the DB phase; the majority of discontinuations (57%) were due to early study termination. In the DB phase, the incidence of TEAEs in fulranumab 3 mg (57.8%) and 1 mg (56.8%) was similar to placebo (56.8%). Two events adjudicated as joint-related events of interest include rapidly progressive osteoarthritis and fracture of unknown etiology. There were no new neurological TEAEs. Fulranumab showed evidence of efficacy in improving pain and physical function based on WOMAC sub-scale scores. Due to premature study termination, the number of patients enrolled were too small to make any definitive efficacy claims.Conclusions: Treatment with fulranumab was generally tolerated with no new safety signals. Within the limited sample analyzed, fulranumab showed evidence of improvement of pain and function in patients with moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis who had failed prior therapy and were candidates for joint replacement surgery.Clinical trial registration numbers: NCT02336685; NCT02336698; NCT02289716; NCT02301234KEY POINTSFulranumab as adjuvant or monotherapy was well tolerated with no new safety signalsFulranumab demonstrated evidence suggestive of efficacy in osteoarthritic pain of hip and kneeFulranumab demonstrated evidence suggestive of improvement of pain and physical function in osteoarthritis.
Assuntos
Artralgia/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoartrite do Quadril , Osteoartrite do Joelho , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Artralgia/diagnóstico , Artralgia/etiologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Término Precoce de Ensaios Clínicos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoartrite do Quadril/diagnóstico , Osteoartrite do Quadril/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoartrite do Quadril/fisiopatologia , Osteoartrite do Joelho/diagnóstico , Osteoartrite do Joelho/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoartrite do Joelho/fisiopatologia , Medição da Dor/métodos , Desempenho Físico Funcional , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
This randomized, double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled, phase 2 study assessed the efficacy and safety of fulranumab as a pain therapy adjunctive to opioids in terminally ill cancer patients. Ninety-eight patients were randomized (2:1) to receive one subcutaneous injection of fulranumab (9 mg) or placebo in the 4-week DB phase. Seventy-one (72%) patients entered the 48-week open-label extension phase and were administered 9 mg of fulranumab every 4 weeks. The study failed to demonstrated efficacy at the end of the DB phase (primary endpoint, mean [SD] change in average cancer-related pain intensity was -.8 (1.26) for fulranumab and -.7 (1.56) for placebo; Pâ¯=â¯.592). However, potential benefit is suggested based on secondary endpoints (30% responder rate [Pâ¯=â¯.020], Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form [BPI-SF] pain intensity subscale [Pâ¯=â¯.003], and pain interference subscale [Pâ¯=â¯.006]). The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events were (fulranumab vs placebo): asthenia (16% vs 10%), decreased appetite (12% vs 6%), fatigue (10% vs 0%), and malignant neoplasm progression (10% vs 0%). Although no differences were seen between fulranumab and placebo groups on the primary endpoint, improvements in BPI-SF pain subscale scores and responder rates support further research of anti-nerve growth factor therapy in cancer-related pain. PERSPECTIVE: Efficacy and safety of fulranumab as adjunctive pain therapy in terminally ill cancer patients were assessed. Results suggest that anti-NGF agents may prove to be novel additions in helping to optimize pain relief in cancer patients who fail to respond adequately to opioids and other common co-analgesics.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/farmacologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/farmacologia , Dor do Câncer/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores Imunológicos/farmacologia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Manejo da Dor , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Fatores Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Injeções Subcutâneas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Falha de TratamentoRESUMO
Neuropathic pain is very challenging to manage because of the heterogeneity of aetiologies, symptoms, and underlying mechanisms. Conventional oral therapies have been limited by negative factors such as systemic side effects, drug-drug interactions, slow onset of action, the need for titration, multiple daily dosing, as well as the potential risk of addiction, dependence, withdrawal symptoms and abuse. Therefore, new therapeutic perspectives are justified. New drugs that act on different therapeutic targets are currently in preclinical development or in their first phases of clinical development. In this review, focus will be directed specifically on new pharmacological treatments for neuropathic pain for which clinical data are already available, including older and known drugs with new data on their anti-neuropathic activity.
Assuntos
Neuralgia/tratamento farmacológico , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapêutico , Compostos Bicíclicos com Pontes/uso terapêutico , Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos , Humanos , Fator de Crescimento Neural/antagonistas & inibidores , Bloqueadores do Canal de Sódio Disparado por Voltagem/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Therapeutic agents commonly used in the management of chronic pain have limited effectiveness and may be associated with issues of dependence and tolerability. Thus, a large unmet medical need exists for the development of safe and effective therapeutics for treatment of chronic pain. A novel approach includes identification of intracellular signals involved in the pain transduction pathway, such as nerve growth factor (NGF). Monoclonal antibodies targeting NGF, such as tanezumab, fulranumab and fasinumab, have been investigated for the treatment of chronic pain conditions. Due to unexpected joint adverse events in clinical studies and concerns about sympathetic nervous system toxicity in animals, these agents were placed on 2 separate partial clinical holds, which were subsequently lifted after rigorous evaluations were conducted to understand how inhibition of NGF impacts safety. To share learnings regarding the rigorous evaluation of clinical and nonclinical safety data which contributed to the removal of these partial clinical holds, this article reviews the rationale for developing agents that target NGF as potential treatments for chronic pain, describes nonclinical and clinical studies of these agents, and describes strategies used to evaluate whether inhibition of NGF has negative effects on joint or sympathetic nervous system safety.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Dor Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Crônica/genética , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Fator de Crescimento Neural/imunologia , Transdução de Sinais , Animais , Dor Crônica/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Fator de Crescimento Neural/fisiologiaRESUMO
There continues to be an unmet need for safe and effective pain medications. Opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) dominate the clinical landscape despite limited effectiveness and considerable side-effect profiles. Although significant advancements have identified myriad potential pain targets over the past several decades, the majority of new pain pharmacotherapies have failed to come to market. The discovery of nerve growth factor (NGF) and its interaction with tropomyosin receptor kinase A (trkA) have been well characterized as important mediators of pain initiation and maintenance, and pharmacotherapies targeting this pathway have the potential to be considered promising methods in the treatment of a variety of nociceptive and neuropathic pain conditions. Several methodologic approaches, including sequestration of free NGF, prevention of NGF binding and trkA activation, and inhibition of trkA function, have been investigated in the development of new pharmacotherapies. Among these, NGF-sequestering antibodies have exhibited the most promise in clinical trials. However, in 2010, reports of rapid joint destruction leading to joint replacement prompted the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to place a hold on all clinical trials involving anti-NGF antibodies. Although the FDA has since lifted this hold and a number of new trials are under way, the long-term efficacy and safety profile of anti-NGF antibodies are yet to be established.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Fulranumab is an investigational, fully human recombinant monoclonal antibody (IgG2) that neutralizes the biological actions of human nerve growth factor. Low back pain is a common cause of noncancer chronic pain and represents one of the most significant socioeconomic health-related problems in developed countries. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to evaluate the analgesic effect of fulranumab in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic low back pain. METHODS: Patients (aged 18-80 years) were randomized to receive subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks in 1 of 5 parallel treatment groups: placebo or fulranumab 1mg (1mgQ4wk), 3mg (3mgQ4wk), 3mg after a 6mg loading dose (6mgLD+3mgQ4wk), or 10mg (10mgQ4wk) every 4 weeks. FINDINGS: A total of 385 patients (median age, 53 years; women, 54%) received at least 1 injection of study medication. No statistically significant differences were observed in improvement of pain intensity scores between the fulranumab treatment regimens and the placebo group at week 12 (primary end point; mean [SD], placebo: -2.0 [2.17], 1mgQ4wk: -1.9 [2.14], 3mgQ4wk: -2.2 [1.89], 6mgLD+3mgQ4wk: -2.0 [1.72] and 10mgQ4wk: -2.1 [2.18]). Results for secondary efficacy parameters (change in the Oswestry Disability Index, Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form, and Patient Global Assessment scales) were consistent with the primary outcome. A placebo effect was observed; the overall percentage of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar between the placebo (76%) and fulranumab treatment groups (77%-90%). Across all phases, the most common TEAEs in at least 10% of patients (combined fulranumab group vs placebo) were arthralgia (15% vs 12%), back pain (15% vs 18%), upper respiratory tract infection (15% vs 8%), paresthesia (14% vs 8%), diarrhea (12% vs 4%), headache (12% vs 8%), hypoesthesia (11% vs 5%), pain in extremity (11% vs 8%), sinusitis (10% vs 5%), and nasopharyngitis (10% vs 9%). Across all phases, neurologic TEAEs were less frequent in the placebo group (14%) versus the fulranumab treatment groups (25%). In the posttreatment phase, 8 patients had joint replacement operations, which were considered a result of normal progression of osteoarthritis. One case in the 10-mg group was determined to be rapid progession of osteoarthritis and was considered to be possibly related to study drug. IMPLICATIONS: Fulranumab did not demonstrate efficacy compared with placebo in patients with chronic low back pain but was generally well-tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00973024.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Dor Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Lombar/tratamento farmacológico , Fator de Crescimento Neural/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Dor Crônica/metabolismo , Dor Crônica/fisiopatologia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Subcutâneas , Dor Lombar/metabolismo , Dor Lombar/fisiopatologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fator de Crescimento Neural/metabolismo , Osteoartrite/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoartrite/metabolismo , Osteoartrite/fisiopatologia , Medição da Dor , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Nerve growth factor (NGF) is increased in chronic pain conditions. This study examined analgesic efficacy and safety of fulranumab, a fully human monoclonal anti-NGF antibody, in adults with chronic osteoarthritis pain. Patients (n=466, intent-to-treat) were randomized to receive, in addition to their current pain therapy, subcutaneous injections in 1 of 6 parallel treatment groups: placebo (n=78), fulranumab 1 mg (n=77) or 3 mg (n=79) every 4 weeks (Q4wk), 3 mg (n=76), 6 mg (n=78), or 10 mg (n=78) every 8 weeks (Q8wk). Primary efficacy results showed that fulranumab significantly reduced the average pain intensity score (P < or = 0.030) from baseline to week 12 compared with placebo in the 3mgQ4wk, 6mgQ8wk, and 10mgQ8wk groups. Secondary efficacy outcomes indicated that significant improvement occurred compared with placebo at week 12 on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index subscales of pain, stiffness, and physical function (P < 0.040) across all fulranumab groups except 1mgQ4wk, on the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form subscales of pain intensity (P < or = 0.016) and pain interference (P < or = 0.030) in the 3mgQ4wk and 10mgQ8wk groups, and on the Patient Global Assessment score (P < or = 0.040) in the 3mgQ4wk, 6mgQ8wk, and 10mgQ8wk groups. The most common (> or = 5% of patients) treatment-emergent adverse events in overall fulranumab groups during the first 12weeks included paresthesia (7%), headache (5%), and nasopharyngitis (5%). Most neurologic-related treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate and resolved at the end of week 12. Serious adverse events occurred in 3 patients, but they were not neurologically related and resolved before study completion. Fulranumab treatment resulted in statistically significant efficacy in pain measures and physical function versus placebo and was generally well tolerated.