Influence of Hip Geometry Reconstruction on Frontal Plane Hip and Knee Joint Moments During Walking Following Primary Total Hip Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Following total hip replacement (THR), hip geometry reconstruction parameters such as the femoral offset (FO) correlate with hip stability and wear. The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between hip geometry parameters and knee and hip joint loading during walking. METHODS: Forty-one patients were examined before and a minimum of 1 year after primary THR. Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was performed to identify relationships between radiographic parameters and gait data. In addition, we divided patients into 2 groups according to the restoration of the FO (within ±5 mm vs more than 5 mm increment). RESULTS: The FO and global offset (GO) showed a positive correlation with the first (r = 0.469, P = .002; r = 0.542, P < .001) and second (r = 0.365, P = .019; r = 0.484, P = .001) knee adduction moment (KAM). The neck-shaft angle revealed a negative correlation with the first hip adduction moment (r = -0.375, P = .047). The reconstruction of FO with an increment of more than 5 mm was associated with a significant higher first KAM (+16%, P = .045) compared to the restored group. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that abnormal hip and knee joint loading during walking after THR have a biomechanical background originating from hip geometry reconstruction. Patients with a high FO/GO were more likely to have an increased KAM during walking or vice versa. Surgeons need to be aware that an accurate control of FO, GO, and neck-shaft angle restoration in THR has an impact on hip and knee joint loading that may influence degenerative changes of the knee and higher wear of the artificial hip joint, respectively.

Comparative Analysis of Radiographic Hip Joint Geometry Using Measurement Tools on Picture Archiving and Communication System: A Prospective Study of 100 Pelvic Radiographs of Koreans.

BACKGROUND: A contralateral normal hip joint has been often used as a reference standard in preoperative planning and intraoperative assessment of hip arthroplasty, with the assumption that bilateral hip joint geometries have no significant differences. However, one previous study using analog measurements on hardcopy films reported significant bilateral variation in hip joint geometry. We therefore investigated the level of agreement between the right and left hips for each measurement and determined index values and the range of normal bilateral variations. METHODS: We assessed 100 standard anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis in this study. Two independent observers measured the actual value of femoral head diameter, location of the femoral head center, acetabular offset, femoral offset, hip offset, greater trochanteric height, neck-shaft angle, medullary canal diameter, and proximal femoral diameter. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and values of mean difference were calculated for each measurement. RESULTS: The results demonstrated perfect agreement (ICC >0.8) between the right and left hips for most parameters and substantial agreement for greater trochanteric height (ICC = 0.735) and femoral offset (ICC = 0.773). The mean difference and standard deviation in the measurement between the right and left hips for the location of the femoral head center and the acetabular offset were 0.60 ± 0.48 mm and 0.42 ± 0.30 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: Hip joint geometry is not influenced by side. In hip arthroplasty, a contralateral normal hip can be reliably used as a guide for preoperative planning using measurement tools on a picture archiving and communication system.

A Quantifiable Risk Factor for ACL Injury: Applied Mathematics to Model the Posterolateral Tibial Plateau Surface Geometry.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism for traumatic ruptures of the native anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is frequently a noncontact injury involving a valgus moment with internal rotation of the tibia. The abnormal rotation and translation of the lateral femoral condyle posteroinferiorly relative to the lateral tibial plateau is thought to be related to the geometry of the tibial plateau. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of the study was to mathematically model the posterior tibial plateau geometry in patients with ACL injuries and compare it with that of matched controls. The hypothesis was that increased convexity and steepness of the posterior aspect of the lateral plateau would subject knees to higher forces, leading to a potentially higher risk of ACL injury. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We mathematically modeled the posterior curvature of the lateral tibial plateau in 64 patients with ACL injuries and 68 matched controls. Using sagittal magnetic resonance imaging scans of the knee, points on the articular cartilage of the posterolateral tibial plateau were selected and curve-fitted to a power function (y = a × xn ). For coefficient a and coefficient n, both variables modulated the shape of the curve, where a larger magnitude represented an increase in slope steepness. Groups were compared using a Mann-Whitney test and α < .05. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in surface geometry between the patients with ACL injuries and matched controls. The equation coefficients were significantly larger in the patients with ACL injuries: coefficient a (ACL injury, 0.9 vs control, 0.68; P < .0001) and coefficient n (ACL injury, 0.34 vs control, 0.30; P = .07). For coefficient a, there was a 78.9% sensitivity, 77.5% specificity, and odds ratio of 12.6 (95% CI, 5.5-29.0) for ACL injury using a cutoff coefficient a = .78. CONCLUSION: Patients with ACL injuries had a significantly greater posterolateral plateau slope. The steeper drop off may play a role in higher anterior translation forces, coupled with internal rotation torques on the knee in noncontact injury, which could increase ACL strain and predispose to ACL injury.

Risk of chronic ankle instability: A reliability study on radiographic assessment of the ankle joint geometry.

BACKGROUND: Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is a multifactorial disabling condition. Ideally all factors contributing to CAI are identified and implemented in a risk assessment model. However, they need to meet strict reliability requirements. To assess usability of radiographic factors for this risk assessment model and future clinical practice, the objective of the current study was to assess the intra and inter observer reliability of three radiographic measurements. METHODS AND METHODS: The radiographs of 39 consecutive patients, at least 16years, who visited the Emergency Department after sustaining a lateral ankle sprain (LAS), were assessed by four observers. The radiographic measurements included absolute and relative ankle alignment, sagittal fibular position and ankle joint congruency (talar radius and height, and tibiotalar sector), performed twice by all observers independently. Reliability was assessed by calculating the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) which was considered good when ICC>0.70. RESULTS: The intra observer reliability of the absolute and relative fibular position, and talar height were good to excellent, (ICC 0.84-0.98, 0.85-0.98, and 0.79-0.93, respectively). The talar radius (ICC 0.69-0.89) was moderate to good. The overall inter observer reliability was good for the absolute and relative fibular position, and talar radius (ICC 0.84, 0.86, and 0.79, respectively). Other measurements had ICC values of <0.70. CONCLUSIONS: In an effort to identify the multifactorial nature of CAI, both the fibular position and the talar radius measurements showed good observer reliability, and will be implemented in a future risk assessment models. The other measurements are too prone for measurement errors, for future reference. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV Case Series.

Restoration of the joint geometry and outcome after stemless TESS shoulder arthroplasty.

AIM: To evaluate the joint geometry and the clinical outcome of stemless, anatomical shoulder arthroplasty with the TESS system. METHODS: Twenty-one shoulders with a mean follow-up 18 of months were included. On scaled digital radiographs the premorbid center of rotation (CoR) was assessed and compared to the CoR of the prosthesis by using the MediCAD® software. Additionally, the pre- and post-operative geometry of the CoR was assessed in relation to the glenoid, the acromion as well as to the proximal humerus. Radiological changes, such as radiolucencies, were also assessed. Clinical outcome was assessed with the Constant and DASH score. RESULTS: Both, the Constant and DASH scores improved significantly from 11% to 75% and from 70 to 30 points, P < 0.01 respectively. There were no significant differences regarding age, etiology, cemented or metal-backed glenoids, etc. (P > 0.05). The pre- and postoperative humeral offset, the lateral glenohumeral offset, the height of the CoR, the acromiohumeral distance as well as neck-shaft angle showed no significant changes (P > 0.05). The mean deviation of the CoR of the prosthesis from the anatomic center was 1.0 ± 2.8 mm. Three cases showed a medial deviation of more than 3 mm. These deviations of 5.1, 5.7 and 7.6 mm and were caused by an inaccurate humeral neck cut. These 3 patients showed a relatively poor outcome scoring. CONCLUSION: TESS arthroplasty allows an anatomical joint reconstruction with a very good outcome. Outliers described in this study sensitize the surgeon for an accurate humeral neck cut.

Geometric profile of the tibial plateau cartilage surface is associated with the risk of non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injury.

The purpose of this study was to determine if geometry of the articular surfaces of the tibial plateau is associated with non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. This was a longitudinal cohort study with a nested case-control analysis. Seventy-eight subjects who suffered a non-contact ACL tear and a corresponding number of controls matched by age, sex, and sport underwent 3 T MRI of both knees. Surface geometry of the tibial articular cartilage was characterized with polynomial equations and comparisons were made between knees on the same person and between ACL-injured and control subjects. There was no difference in surface geometry between the knees of the control subjects. In contrast, there were significant differences in the surface geometry between the injured and normal knees of the ACL-injured subjects, suggesting that the ACL injury changed the cartilage surface profile. Therefore, comparisons were made between the uninjured knees of the ACL-injured subjects and the corresponding knees of their matched controls and this revealed significant differences in the surface geometry for the medial (p < 0.006) and lateral (p < 0.001) compartments. ACL-injured subjects tended to demonstrate a posterior-inferior directed orientation of the articular surface relative to the long axis of the tibia, while the control subjects were more likely to show a posterior-superior directed orientation.