Three-Year Outcomes of a Multicenter Study of Japanese-Style Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy(LSC) is widely performed and has been reported to safe and effective. However, statistical data on this technique are unavailable. Therefore, we designed the Japanese-style LSC, a further evolution of the French-style LSC, and initiated this multicenter study to prospectively evaluate its efficacy and safety. If the Japanese-style LSC is successful, we may be able to propose a more reliable and standardized procedure. METHODS: This is a prospective study of Japanese-style LSC. The Japanese-style LSC is characterized by the dissection of the vaginal walls as distally as possible and fixation of the mesh with multiple sutures; fixation of the mesh on the promontory without traction; and closure of the peritoneum with high-level peritoneal sutures. We examined the primary (anatomical recurrence, adverse events, and quality of life) and secondary endpoints (voiding symptoms and sexual function) at 3 years postoperatively. RESULTS: In anatomical recurrence, 24 patients (9.2%) were ≥ stage2 in the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system at 3 years postoperatively, of which 4 (1.5%) and 20 (7.7%) were stages III and II respectively. No mesh-related complications were observed, and each questionnaire showed predominant improvement, except for sexual and evacuation functions. CONCLUSIONS: The Japanese-style LSC demonstrated superior anatomical and functional results and we propose it to be an effective procedure.

Incidence of stress urinary incontinence after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the occurrence of stress urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse surgery using the laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy method. This is a retrospective multicenter study. METHODS: The study included 131 patients who underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and underwent at least a one-year follow-up in the form of a clinical examination. RESULTS: The group included patients with an average age of 63.4 years (38-80 years), BMI 26.6 kg/m2 (19.4-36 kg/m2), and parity 2 (0-4). Before surgery, 30 (22.9%) patients showed stress incontinence, and after surgery there were 50 (38.2%); the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0007). Thirty (22.9%) patients underwent subsequent anti-incontinence surgery, while 10 (7.6%) patients experienced significant improvement of stress incontinence. CONCLUSION: Pelvic organ prolapse reconstruction surgery by laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is associated with the risk of postoperative stress incontinence in 38.2%, of which de novo in 22.9% of cases.

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomised controlled trial and prospective cohort (SALTO-2 trial).

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) or vaginal sacrospinous fixation (VSF) is the most optimal surgical treatment in patients with POP-Q stage ≥2 vaginal vault prolapse (VVP). DESIGN: Multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) and prospective cohort study alongside. SETTING: Seven non-university teaching hospitals and two university hospitals in the Netherlands. POPULATION: Patients with symptomatic post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse, requiring surgical treatment. METHODS: Randomisation in a 1:1 ratio to LSC or VSF. Evaluation of prolapse was done using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q). All participants were asked to fill in various Dutch validated questionnaires 12 months postoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was disease-specific quality of life. Secondary outcomes included composite outcome of success and anatomical failure. Furthermore, we examined peri-operative data, complications and sexual function. RESULTS: A total of 179 women, 64 women randomised and 115 women, participated in a prospective cohort. Disease-specific quality of life did not differ after 12 months between the LSC and VSF group in the RCT and the cohort (RCT: P = 0.887; cohort: P = 0.704). The composite outcomes of success for the apical compartment, in the RCT and cohort, were 89.3% and 90.3% in the LSC group and 86.2% and 87.8% in the VSF group, respectively (RCT: P = 0.810; cohort: P = 0.905). There were no differences in number of reinterventions and complications between both groups (reinterventions RCT: P = 0.934; cohort: P = 0.120; complications RCT: P = 0.395; cohort: P = 0.129). CONCLUSIONS: LSC and VSF are both effective treatments for vaginal vault prolapse, after a follow-up period of 12 months.

Clinical outcomes and complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with versus without concomitant hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse in Hong Kong Chinese patients after median follow-up of 7 years.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This retrospective cohort study is aimed at comparing outcomes and complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) with or without concomitant hysterectomy in the Hong Kong Chinese population. METHODS: Women with stage II or above uterine or apical vault prolapse who underwent LSC with or without concomitant hysterectomy in a regional referral unit from 2007 to 2019 were included. The primary objectives were to compare the anatomical outcomes by pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP-Q) and recurrence of apical vault prolapse (≥stage II). The secondary objective was to compare the functional outcomes and complications. Anatomical recurrence and incidence of mesh exposure were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard regression was performed to identify risk factors of anatomical recurrence. RESULTS: Seventy-six women were included for analysis. The recurrence rate of apical vault prolapse was 3.9% after a median follow-up time of 83 months (20-190 months). A significant reduction of POP-Q scores of three compartments in both groups of women were demonstrated (p<0.001). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of functional outcomes and complications. 6.6% of women developed mesh exposure. The time to recurrence of apical vault prolapse was shorter in women who had LSC with prior hysterectomy (p =0.019). No risk factors were identified for recurrence of apical vault prolapse. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concomitant hysterectomy is comparable with LSC alone. The recurrence and complication rates are low. We suggest that LSC with concomitant hysterectomy might be offered to women with pelvic organ prolapse, with women's preference taken into account.

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study was to evaluate long-term outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) for vaginal vault prolapse (VVP). METHODS: Long-term follow-up of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (SALTO trial). A total of 74 women were randomly assigned to LSC (n=37) or ASC (n=37). Primary outcome was disease-specific quality of life, measured with validated questionnaires. Secondary outcomes included anatomical outcome, composite outcome of success, complications, and retreatment. RESULTS: We analyzed 22 patients in the LSC group and 19 patients in the ASC group for long-term follow-up, with a median follow-up of 109 months (9.1 years). Disease-specific quality of life did not differ after long-term follow-up with median scores of 0.0 (LSC: IQR 0-17; ASC: IQR 0-0) on the "genital prolapse" domain of the Urogenital Distress Inventory in both groups (p = 0.175). Anatomical outcomes were the same for both groups on all points of the POP-Q. The composite outcome of success for the apical compartment is 78.6% (n = 11) in the LSC group and 84.6% (n = 11) in the ASC group (p = 0.686). Mesh exposures occurred in 2 patients (12.5%) in the LSC group and 1 patient (7.7%) in the ASC group. There were 5 surgical reinterventions in both groups (LSC: 22.7%; ASC: 26.3%, p = 0.729). CONCLUSIONS: At long-term follow-up no substantial differences in quality of life, anatomical results, complications, or reinterventions between LSC and ASC were observed. Therefore, the laparoscopic approach is preferable, considering the short-term advantages. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register NTR6330, 18 January 2017, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/5964.

Comparison of laparoscopic lateral suspension and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concurrent total laparoscopic hysterectomy for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We compared the outcomes of women who underwent laparoscopic lateral suspension with concurrent total laparoscopic hysterectomy (LLS-TLH) with those of women who underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concurrent total laparoscopic hysterectomy (LSC-TLH) for apical and/or anterior vaginal wall prolapse. METHODS: Eighty women underwent LLS-TLH or LSC-TLH operations. According to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q), women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse of stage 2 or higher apical and/or anterior compartment prolapse were enrolled in the study. The objective cure rate according to the POP-Q system was the primary (objective) outcome. The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Vaginal Symptoms (ICIQ-VS), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire scores were the secondary (subjective) outcomes. The primary and secondary outcomes were evaluated at 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: The primary and secondary outcomes indicated significant improvements in both groups (p < 0.05). The objective cure rate was 92.5% for apical and 78.6% for anterior compartment prolapse in the LLS-TLH group; the respective rates were 100% and 74.1% in the LSC-TLH group. The subjective cure rate was 87.5% for the LLS-TLH group and 90% for the LSC-TLH group. No statistically significant differences between groups were found in the objective cure rate, subjective cure rate, or ICIQ-VS, ICIQ-SF, or PGI-I scores at 1 year (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: LLS-TLH can serve as a safe, effective, and feasible alternative to LSC-TLH, with low complication rates and similar short-term objective and subjective outcomes.

Lateral extension and attachment of mesh to the lateral vagina during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a modified technique aimed at lowering recurrences in the anterior vaginal compartment. A surgical video.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy has been demonstrated to be the gold standard of prolapse surgery in cases with apical defect. Most recurrences seem to occur in the anterior compartment, especially if a paravaginal defect is present. To reduce the incidence of anterior recurrence after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy we modified our previous published technique by placing the anterior mesh not only deep under the bladder but also laterally and fixing it to the lateral edge of the vagina. With this video article, we would like to show and explain our modified technique and demonstrate how lateral mesh placement can be easily and safely performed using laparoscopy. METHODS: The video demonstrates our modified technique with lateral extension and fixation of the anterior mesh to the lateral vagina during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in a patient with severe uterine prolapse (grade III) and a large cystocele (grade III). Special emphasis is given to the topographical anatomy of the paravaginal space and the surgical technique of lateral fixation. RESULTS: This modified new technique shows excellent perioperative results in more than 100 cases without any occurrences of lesions of the ureters. Our initial experience also shows very good anatomical results in all three compartments. CONCLUSIONS: Paravaginal dissection and exposure of the ureters to extend the mesh placement and fixation to the lateral border of the vagina in the anterior compartment during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy seem to be feasible and safe, helping to significantly reduce the risk of anterior recurrences. Prospective data are needed to evaluate this interesting technique.

Comparative anatomy of the ovine and human pelvis for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: evaluating the effectiveness of the ovine model.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) is a functional reconstructive surgery used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in middle-aged women. Although LSC is widely used, its implementation is hindered by perceived technical difficulties and surgical learning curves. Surgeons require adequate experience with LSC prior to performing the procedure on patients to improve their quality of life. This study is aimed at demonstrating the effectiveness of the ovine model (OM) for training and research in LSC, while also comparing anatomical differences between ovine and human models during the procedure. METHODS: The animal model and training were provided by the Jesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre. Urologists and gynecologists with experience in LSC participated in a course and their findings were recorded and documented. RESULTS: Differences in patient positioning, trocar placement, and reperitonealization were identified between the ovine and human models. Hysterectomy is always performed in the ovine model, whereas it is not mandatory in humans. There are also differences in the dissection of the levator ani muscle and attachment point of the posterior mesh to the uterus between the two models. Despite differences in some areas, the ovine pelvic structure and vagina are similar in size to those of humans. CONCLUSIONS: The ovine model is a valuable tool for surgeons in their learning curve for LSC, allowing for safe and effective practice prior to performing the procedure on patients. The use of the OM can help to improve the quality of life for women affected by pelvic organ prolapse.

Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Pectopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Compared with Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical benefits of laparoscopic pectopexy vs laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: A tertiary hospital. PATIENTS: We included 203 patients with POP. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic pectopexy or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Anatomic effectiveness was measured using the POP Quantification system, both before and after operation. Functional recovery effectiveness was evaluated using complications and recurrence rates within 1 year. Quality of life was assessed by the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 and Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaires at enrollment and postoperative months 3, 6, and 12. Comparisons between groups were performed using t test, chi-square test, and mixed-effects model with repeated measures. The analysis included 203 eligible patients (sacrocolpopexy, 101; pectopexy, 102). The proportion of robotic-assisted surgeries was lower in the pectopexy group than in the sacrocolpopexy group (15.7% vs 41.6%, p <.001). The average operation time of pectopexy was shorter than that of sacrocolpopexy (174.2 vs 187.7 minutes) with a mean difference of 13.5 minutes (95% confidence interval, 3.9-23.0; p = .006). Differences of intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, and postoperative 7-day complications between groups were not significant. Anatomic successes were obtained in both groups with similar improvement in POP Quantification scores. The rate of urinary symptoms recurrence was higher in the pectopexy group (13.7%) than in the sacrocolpopexy group (5.0%) at the 1-year follow-up (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-8.8, p = .032). The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 and Incontinence Quality of Life scores were better improved at postoperative months 3, 6, and 12 for laparoscopic pectopexy than for sacrocolpopexy. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic pectopexy revealed comparable anatomic success, shorter operation time, and better improvement in quality of life scores of prolapse, colorectal-anal, and urinary symptoms at 1-year follow-up, possibly being an alternative when sacrocolpopexy is not practicable. However, clinicians should pay more attention to the recurrence of urinary symptoms after pectopexy.

Three-dimensional vs two-dimensional endoscopic approach in urogynecology: A retrospective cohort study of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

AIM: The gold standard to treat an apical pelvic organ prolapse is the abdominal route via a sacrocolpopexy, which is also reproduced by laparoscopic route. A laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy however, requires surgical expertise. Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy has been developed to overcome the lack of depth perception, that is a known disadvantage of conventional two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy. This procedure can accelerate the learning curve and optimize the intra-, peri-, and postoperative outcomes. This study aims to compare 3D laparoscopy to traditional 2D laparoscopy for sacrocolpopexy. METHODS: Data from 132 patients who underwent a sacrocolpopexy with 2D or 3D laparoscopy in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, between June 2012 and September 2021, were collected retrospectively. Seventy-one laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy operations in 2D (n = 23) and 3D (n = 48) group were reviewed and compared regarding the duration of surgery, blood loss and the length of hospital admission as primary objectives. RESULTS: There were no differences in the baseline demographics between the two groups. The estimated blood loss (1.0 (±0.6) g/dL vs 1.7 (±1.0) g/dL, p = 0.010), and duration of surgery (115.4 (±34.7) min. vs 134.7 (±26.2) min., p = 0.012) was significantly better in favor of 3D laparoscopy. The length of hospital stay was comparable in both groups (p = 0.833). Furthermore, no differences were observed between the groups regarding other surgical outcomes. CONCLUSION: 3D laparoscopy shows a significant benefit in terms of estimated blood loss and surgery duration among complex urogynecological surgeries compared to traditional 2D laparoscopy.

Medium term anatomical and functional outcomes following modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We evaluated the anatomical and functional outcomes following modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) utilizing deep dissection of the vaginal walls and distal mesh fixation at the anterior and posterior compartments. We hypothesized that anatomical and functional outcomes improve after this modified LSC technique. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all women (n = 240) who underwent LSC for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) from January to December 2017 in a tertiary center. POP-Q staging, validated questionnaires (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form [ICIQ-SF] and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Questionnaire-Short Form), and uroflowmetry were used to evaluate the anatomical and functional outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using McNemar test and repeated measures analysis of variance with Fisher's least significant difference post hoc (p < 0.05). RESULTS: The anatomical success rate is 96%, with a prolapse recurrence rate of 3.8% at 3-year follow-up. Bulge symptoms and anatomical compartments were significantly improved after LSC. Clinically, there were significant improvements after LSC in voiding dysfunction and bowel symptoms. Also, there was a significant increase in stress urinary incontinence and non-significant decrease in mixed urinary incontinence and urge urinary incontinence. ICIQ-SF and Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory 8 scores were significantly lower after LSC, signifying improvement in incontinence and bowel symptoms. CONCLUSION: Our modified LSC technique is safe and effective in restoring level 1 and level 2 supports, without adverse effects on urinary and bowel function. Bladder and bowel symptoms have also been found to keep improving over time.

Glue mesh fixation in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: results at 3 years' follow-up.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We assessed 3-year anatomic and functional results using synthetic glue to fix mesh in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. METHODS: Prospective multicenter cohort study in three academic urogynecology departments. Seventy consecutive patients with stage ≥ 3 POP-Q (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification) anterior and/or apical prolapse underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy using synthetic surgical glue to fix anterior and posterior meshes to the vagina. Patients were followed up at 1, 2 and 3 years. Primary outcome was anterior and apical anatomic success (POP-Q stage ≤ 1) at 3 years. Secondary outcomes comprised functional results (international quality of life and sexuality scales), mesh-related morbidity and urinary incontinence at 3 years. RESULTS: Mean age was 56.7 ± 1.2 years. Mean follow-up was 43 months. Anterior compartment anatomic success rate was 87% at 2 years (Ba, -2.4 cm; p < 0.0001) and 86.5% at 3 years (Ba, -2.3 cm; p < 0.0001); apical success was 96.3% at 2 years (C, -6.8 cm; p < 0.0001) and 97.3% at 3 years (C, -6.5 cm; p < 0.0001). All quality-of-life scores improved significantly and lastingly at 3 years: PFDI-20, PFIQ-7 and PISQ-12, respectively, p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001 and p = 0.01. There was one case of vaginal mesh exposure at 3 years (2.8%) and five of mesh shrinkage at 1 year (7.8%), none at 2 years and two at 3 years (5.4%). Urinary incontinence rate was 29.7% at 1 year, 14.8% at 2 years and 11.1% at 3 years. CONCLUSION: Vaginal mesh adhesive in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy remained effective at 3 years, with excellent tolerance and no specific complications. Anatomic and functional results were good and enduring in terms of both anterior and apical correction.

Mesh exposure following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a narrative review.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Sacrocolpopexy is considered mainstay treatment for apical or vaginal vault prolapse and is currently most often performed via a minimally invasive approach. Although mesh-related complications after this procedure are uncommon, mesh exposure can have an important impact on the patient's quality of life. Our objective is to perform a literature review on this complication post laparoscopic or robotic sacrocolpopexy. METHODS: Web of Science and MEDLINE databases were searched for relevant articles published between 2005 and 2021. We retrieved 272 articles of which 83 ultimately were withheld. RESULTS: Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (MISC) implies a low risk of mesh exposure, which is currently estimated at 3.5%. Literature however is marked by substantial methodological heterogeneity. Controversy remains in the debate over prevention of mesh exposure after MISC. Performing a concomitant total hysterectomy is associated with an increased risk compared to subtotal hysterectomy or hysteropexy. Treatment of mesh exposure is challenging as guidelines are lacking. Although supported by few prospective data, patients with asymptomatic mesh exposure are managed conservatively. Surgical intervention, preferentially performed by an experienced pelvic surgeon, is indicated in symptomatic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Mesh exposure is often undiagnosed and remains untreated. There is a gap in evidence exploring risk factors for mesh-related complications and efficient measures for reducing them. Choosing the best treatment option is still difficult. Management should be individualized and optimized at the time of diagnosis. Lack of acknowledgement and experience can result in increased morbidity.

Female sexuality before and after sacrocolpopexy or vaginal mesh: is vaginal length one of the key factors?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to demonstrate that laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy (LSC-Cx) versus anterior vaginal mesh (AVM) results in a longer vaginal length without impacting sexual activity or function. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of sexual outcomes of a previous randomized control trial comparing LSC-Cx and AVM in 120 women (60/group) with symptomatic POP stage ≥ 3. We evaluated sexually active (SA) and non-sexually active women (NSA) using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR) preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Multivariate logistic and linear regression models were built to assess the impact of different variables on sexual activity and function, respectively. RESULTS: Among 120 women included, no statistically significant differences were found between vaginal length and preoperative dyspareunia (20.7% AVM vs. 22,8% LSC-Cx) comparing SA to NSA women and LSC-Cx to AVM. Vaginal length was significantly longer after LSC-Cx versus AVM (p < 0.001). The postoperative dyspareunia rate was 17.2% AVM versus 10.5% LSC-Cx. Partnered women were significantly more likely to be SA than unpartnered women before (OR = 19.04; p = 0.006) and after surgery (OR = 36.28; p = 0.002). Only dyspareunia was independently associated with sexual function pre- (B = -0.431; p = 0.017) and postoperatively (B = -0.3 96; p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal length was greater following LSC-Cx compared to AVM. While vaginal length has no impact on female sexuality pre- and postoperatively, the most important factors were "having a partner" for sexual activity and dyspareunia for sexual function. Persistence of dyspareunia was higher after AVM. LSC-Cx should be considered in women with POP undergoing mesh surgery with future sexual expectations.

Medium- to long-term outcomes of vaginally assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of stage III-IV pelvic organ prolapse.

BACKGROUND: Vaginally assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (VALS) refers to the placement of synthetic meshes through the vagina in addition to traditional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. In this study, we aimed to investigate the medium- to long-term efficacy and safety of VALS for treating stage III-IV pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS: The study was designed as a case series at a single center. Patients with stage III-IV POP in our hospital from January 2010 to December 2018 were included. Perioperative parameters, objective and subjective outcomes, and complications were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients completed the follow-up and were included in our study. Within a median follow-up duration of 35.4 months, the objective cure ratio of VALS reached 92.45% (98/106), and the subjective success rate was 99.06% (105/106). Patients reported significant improvements in subjective symptoms. In eight patients suffering anatomic prolapse recurrence, two posterior POP cases were treated by posterior pelvic reconstruction surgery, while six anterior POP cases did not need surgical therapies. The reoperation rate was 1.89% (2/106). No intraoperative complications occurred. Three patients (2.83%) had postoperative fever, and one (0.94%) had wound infection during hospitalization. Six patients (5.66%) had mesh exposure on the vaginal wall, and de novo urinary incontinence occurred in two patients (1.89%) during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: VALS is an effective and safe surgical method for treating severe POP. Therefore, VALS should be considered in the treatment of severe POP due to its favorable subjective and objective outcomes, relatively low rate of infection and acceptable rate of mesh exposure.

Impact of Laparoscopic Prolapse Repair in the Levator Hiatus Area.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether laparoscopic surgery by sacrocolpopexy or sacrocervicopexy with posterior mesh attachment to levator ani to treat pelvic organ prolapse reduces the levator hiatus area, as measured by transperineal 3- and 4-dimensional ultrasound. The secondary objective was to assess the risk factors for prolapse recurrence. DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study. SETTING: A university tertiary hospital. PATIENTS: Women with symptomatic apical prolapse at a high risk of recurrence were included. High risk of recurrence was defined as age <60 years and levator injury (avulsion and/or ballooning) or stage III-IV prolapse Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification. INTERVENTIONS: Women were treated with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or sacrocervicopexy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Women underwent clinical examination according to assessment by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system and transperineal ultrasound for the levator hiatus area at Valsalva. We collected demographic, clinical, and ultrasound data before surgery from clinical records and performed a comparative analysis of the levator hiatus areas before and after surgery and univariate and multivariate analyses of the risk factors for recurrence. Among the 30 women who enrolled, the levator hiatus area at Valsalva decreased significantly after surgery by an average of 4.68 cm2 (p = .028). However, despite a recurrence rate of 13.3%, we found no risk factors associated with recurrence in either the univariate or the multivariate analyses. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery by sacrocolpopexy or sacrocervicopexy for pelvic organ prolapse with mesh posterior attachment to levator ani significantly reduces the levator hiatus area measured by transperineal ultrasound. Further large-scale studies will be needed to confirm our results and identify risk factors for recurrence.

Impact of sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse on voiding dysfunction and uroflowmetry parameters: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Voiding difficulties in the context of pelvic organ prolapse are often neglected or underestimated. To date, there are heterogeneous data available on the outcome of a surgical correction of pelvic organ prolapse and the impact on concomitant voiding dysfunction. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy would resolve preoperative voiding dysfunction and the impact on objective uroflowmetry parameters. METHODS: Data from 103 women undergoing sacrocolpopexy for prolapse stage ≥ II with concurrent objective and/or subjective voiding dysfunction were prospectively evaluated. All women underwent full urogynecological examination, and completed a validated questionnaire pre- and postoperatively. Objective uroflowmetry parameters and subjective outcome data regarding voiding functions were compared pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: All points of the POP-Q system improved significantly pre- to postoperatively (p < 0.001). Preoperatively, 42 of 103 women showed a postvoid residual ≥ 100 ml, whereas only six women had a relevant postvoid residual postoperatively. In total, the postoperative postvoid residual in all women decreased significantly (p < 0.001). Voiding time decreased significantly postoperatively (p < 0.001) with no significant change in the voided volume (p = 0.352). The maximum flow rate increased postoperatively, reaching no statistically significant change (p = 0.132). Subjective outcome measurements (weak or prolonged stream, incomplete bladder emptying, and straining to void) improved significantly (p < 0.001 for all the questions). CONCLUSION: Our prospective study demonstrates that sacrocolpopexy to correct pelvic organ prolapse can successfully resolve voiding dysfunction, as both objective and subjective parameters improved significantly after surgery.

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse in the elderly: safety and outcomes.

Due to its low postoperative complication rate, vaginal surgery is the preferred intervention for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in elderly patients. We aimed to assess outcomes and perioperative complication rates associated with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) in elderly women. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 74 consecutive patients [52 (70.3%) aged <75 years; 22 (29.7%) aged ≥75 years] with POP who underwent LSC between August 2015 and December 2017. We evaluated preoperative risks using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and complications, using the Clavien-Dindo grading (CDG). No between-group differences were observed in CCI. CDG indicated fewer perioperative complications in patients aged >75 years. Anatomical success rates at 15 months were 95.5% and 90.4% in patients aged ≥75 and <75 years, respectively. LSC has a high anatomical correction rate and few perioperative complications regardless of age. Thus, the appropriate surgical intervention method would depend on the patient's health and comorbidities.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) is a superior method to vaginal surgery because of its anatomical and functional outcomes, particularly regarding sexual activity.What do the results of this study add? In this single-center study with a 15-month follow-up, we demonstrated that LSC has a high anatomical correction rate and few perioperative complications regardless of age at the time of surgery. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the rate of complications between the ≥75 and <75 years groups. Thus, LSC may be considered for women aged >75 years. However, in these elderly patients, the surgical method should be determined according to their health status and medical comorbidities.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Age should not be the basis for exclusion from laparoscopic procedures. Moreover, LSC is a suitable and valid option for elderly women with POP. As the study population consisted of a homogenous group of Japanese women, it lacks generalisability. Studies evaluating these outcomes are required in other populations.

Recovery expectancies impact postdischarge recovery 42 days after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to determine if recovery expectancies were associated with actual postdischarge recovery after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. METHODS: Study subjects (N = 167) undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy were asked to preoperatively predict the likelihood of a prolonged postdischarge recovery (> 42 days). Low, medium, and high recovery expectancy groups were created from responses to the likelihood of prolonged postdischarge recovery question. Previously established predictors of actual recovery 42 days after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy included age, body mass index, Charlson co-morbidity index, short form (SF)-36 bodily pain scores, doctors' and others' health locus of control, and sick role investment. One parsimonious hierarchical linear and logistic regression model was constructed to determine if preoperative recovery expectancies were independently associated with PSR13 scores and "significant" postdischarge recovery after controlling for previously established predictors. RESULTS: Study subjects with high recovery expectancies had higher PSR13 scores than subjects with low recovery expectancies (82.32 ± 15.34 vs 73.30 ± 15.30, mean difference 9.01, 95%CI 1.08-16.94). Study subjects with low recovery expectancies scored 7.7 points lower on the PSR13 scale (minimally important difference = 5), which translated into a 73% reduction in the likelihood of being "significantly" recovered 42 days after surgery, after controlling for previously established predictors. CONCLUSIONS: A low recovery expectancy has a negative impact on actual recovery 42 days after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Our findings are important because preoperative recovery expectancies are modifiable predictors, making them a candidate for an expectancy manipulation intervention designed to optimize recovery after pelvic reconstructive surgery.

A new method of adjusting mesh tension using cystoscopy during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

We aimed to examine the usefulness of cystoscopic findings to guide mesh tension adjustment during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) to promote better repair of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and prevent de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI). In this technique, the bladder wall was observed using a cystoscope when various traction pressures were applied by pulling the mesh arm with forceps before fixation to the promontory during LSC. Adjustment was performed on 20 patients, and postoperative outcomes of POP repair and development of de novo SUI were evaluated. When excessive traction was applied on the mesh arm, a bladder neck opening and a cord-like elevation in the center of the trigone and posterior wall were observed in all cases. The tension was gradually loosened, and precisely when the above-mentioned cystoscopic finding ("Central Road") disappeared, an anatomically appropriate elevation of the vaginal apex was achieved; the mesh arm was fixed to the promontory. At 6 months after LSC, anterior wall recurrences were diagnosed in four patients (beyond the hymen in one) with few symptoms, while no occurrence of de novo SUI. Cystoscopic findings during mesh tension adjustment in LSC could be useful in achieving improved POP repair.