A registered report of a two-site study of variations of the flanker task: ERN experimental effects and data quality.

Error-related negativity is a widely used measure of error monitoring, and many projects are independently moving ERN recorded during a flanker task toward standardization, optimization, and eventual clinical application. However, each project uses a different version of the flanker task and tacitly assumes ERN is functionally equivalent across each version. The routine neglect of a rigorous test of this assumption undermines efforts to integrate ERN findings across tasks, optimize and standardize ERN assessment, and widely apply ERN in clinical trials. The purpose of this registered report was to determine whether ERN shows similar experimental effects (correct vs. error trials) and data quality (intraindividual variability) during three commonly used versions of a flanker task. ERN was recorded from 172 participants during three versions of a flanker task across two study sites. ERN scores showed numerical differences between tasks, raising questions about the comparability of ERN findings across studies and tasks. Although ERN scores from all three versions of the flanker task yielded high data quality and internal consistency, one version did outperform the other two in terms of the size of experimental effects and the data quality. Exploratory analyses of the error positivity (Pe) provided tentative support for the other two versions of the task over the paradigm that appeared optimal for ERN. The present study provides a roadmap for how to statistically compare psychometric characteristics of ERP scores across paradigms and gives preliminary recommendations for flanker tasks to use for ERN- and Pe-focused studies.

Alternative covariance structures in mixed-effects models: Addressing intra- and inter-individual heterogeneity.

Mixed-effects models for repeated measures and longitudinal data include random coefficients that are unique to the individual, and thus permit subject-specific growth trajectories, as well as direct study of how the coefficients of a growth function vary as a function of covariates. Although applications of these models often assume homogeneity of the within-subject residual variance that characterizes within-person variation after accounting for systematic change and the variances of the random coefficients of a growth model that quantify individual differences in aspects of change, alternative covariance structures can be considered. These include allowing for serial correlations between the within-subject residuals to account for dependencies in data that remain after fitting a particular growth model or specifying the within-subject residual variance to be a function of covariates or a random subject effect to address between-subject heterogeneity due to unmeasured influences. Further, the variances of the random coefficients can be functions of covariates to relax the assumption that these variances are constant across subjects and to allow for the study of determinants of these sources of variation. In this paper, we consider combinations of these structures that permit flexibility in how mixed-effects models are specified to understand within- and between-subject variation in repeated measures and longitudinal data. Data from three learning studies are analyzed using these different specifications of mixed-effects models.

Catching Up on Multilevel Modeling.

This review focuses on the use of multilevel models in psychology and other social sciences. We target readers who are catching up on current best practices and sources of controversy in the specification of multilevel models. We first describe common use cases for clustered, longitudinal, and cross-classified designs, as well as their combinations. Using examples from both clustered and longitudinal designs, we then address issues of centering for observed predictor variables: its use in creating interpretable fixed and random effects of predictors, its relationship to endogeneity problems (correlations between predictors and model error terms), and its translation into multivariate multilevel models (using latent-centering within multilevel structural equation models). Finally, we describe novel extensions-mixed-effects location-scale models-designed for predicting differential amounts of variability.

Intraindividual variability in sleep among athletes: A systematic review of definitions, operationalizations, and key correlates.

Via systematic review with narrative synthesis of findings, we aimed to document the ways by which researchers have defined, operationalized, and examined sleep variability among athletes. We identified studies in which scholars examined intraperson variability in sleep among athletes via a search of six databases (Web of Science, Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, CINHAL Plus, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global) using a protocol that included keywords for the target outcome (sleep*), population (athlet* OR sport*), and outcome operationalization (variability OR variation OR "standard deviation" OR fluctuate OR fluctuation OR stability OR instability OR reactivity OR IIV OR intraindividual). We complemented this primary search with citation searching of eligible articles. Assessments of study quality captured eight core elements, namely aims/hypotheses, sample size justification, sample representativeness, number of days sleep assessed, measures of sleep and its correlates, missing data, and inferences and conclusions. From a total of 1209 potentially relevant papers, we identified 16 studies as meeting our eligibility criteria. Concept definitions of variability were notably absent from this work and where available were vague. Quantitative deviations from one's typical level of target sleep metrics reflected the essence by which all but one of the research teams operationalized sleep variability. We assessed the overall quality of empirical work as moderate in nature. We propose a working definition of sleep variability that can inform knowledge generation on the temporal, day-to-day dynamics of sleep functioning that is required for personalized interventions for optimizing sleep health.

Score tests for scale effects, with application to genomic analysis.

Tests for variance or scale effects due to covariates are used in many areas and recently, in genomic and genetic association studies. We study score tests based on location-scale models with arbitrary error distributions that allow incorporation of additional adjustment covariates. Tests based on Gaussian and Laplacian double generalized linear models are examined in some detail. Numerical properties of the tests under Gaussian and other error distributions are examined. Our results show that the use of model-based asymptotic distributions with score tests for scale effects does not control type 1 error well in many settings of practical relevance. We consider simple statistics based on permutation distribution approximations, which correspond to well-known statistics derived by another approach. They are shown to give good type 1 error control under different error distributions and under covariate distribution imbalance. The methods are illustrated through a differential gene expression analysis involving breast cancer tumor samples.

Bayesian inference on mixed-effects location scale models with skew-t distribution and mismeasured covariates for longitudinal data.

In AIDS studies, heterogeneous between and within subject variations are often observed on longitudinal endpoints. To accommodate heteroscedasticity in the longitudinal data, statistical methods have been developed to model the mean and variance jointly. Most of these methods assume (conditional) normal distributions for random errors, which is not realistic in practice. In this article, we propose a Bayesian mixed-effects location scale model with skew-t distribution and mismeasured covariates for heterogeneous longitudinal data with skewness. The proposed model captures the between-subject and within-subject (WS) heterogeneity by modeling the between-subject and WS variations with covariates as well as a random effect at subject level in the WS variance. Further, the proposed model also takes into account the covariate measurement errors, and commonly assumed normal distributions for model errors are substituted by skew-t distribution to account for skewness. Parameter estimation is carried out in a Bayesian framework. The proposed method is illustrated with a Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. Simulation studies are performed to assess the performance of the proposed method. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Characterizing the momentary association between loneliness, depression, and social interactions: Insights from an ecological momentary assessment study.

Evidence suggests that loneliness causes people to feel more depressed. It is unknown, however, why this association occurs and whether momentary versus chronic experiences of loneliness are implicated. Theoretical accounts suggest that momentary feelings of loneliness produce two competing motivations: social reaffiliation and social withdrawal. Social affiliation is protective against depression; social withdrawal, in contrast, is a risk factor. Thus, engaging in frequent and high-quality interactions following experiences of loneliness may protect against subsequent depression. We tested this hypothesis using a random-interval experience sampling design (5x/day/day, 14 days; Nobs = 6568) with a racially/ethnically diverse sample of adults with elevated depression symptoms (N = 102). Momentary loneliness was associated with depressed mood at the same time point and âˆ¼2.5h and âˆ¼5h later. Frequency and quality of social interaction did not moderate these associations. Findings suggest that momentary feelings of loneliness may be an important target for clinical intervention.

An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study Investigating the Function of Hoarding.

This study examined the function of hoarding behaviors and the relations between hoarding and a series of cognitive and affective processes in the moment using ecological momentary assessment. A matched-groups design was used to compare college students with higher hoarding symptoms (n = 31) and matched controls (n = 29). The two groups did not differ in what function they reported acquiring served, and positive automatic reinforcement was the most commonly reported function in both groups. Engaging in hoarding-relevant behaviors did not predict change in positive or negative affect when controlling for previous affect. Emotional reactivity and experiential avoidance in the moment were both elevated in the higher hoarding group compared to controls, while momentary mindfulness and negative affect differentiation were lower. Overall, these findings support the importance of emotion regulation processes in hoarding. They also suggest individuals may not be successfully regulating affect in the moment with hoarding behaviors, despite efforts to do so. It may be useful to evaluate processes such as striving for positive affect in hoarding disorder in the future.

A mixed-effects location scale model for time-to-event data: A smoking behavior application.

In general, mixed-effects location scale models (MELS) allow assessment of within-person and between-person variability with time-to-event data for outcomes that follow a normal or ordinal distribution. In this article, we extend the mixed-effects location scale model to time-to-event data in relation to smoking data. Better understanding of the time-graded within-person variability of factors involved in nicotine dependence can be helpful to researchers in their efforts to fine-tune smoking cessation programs. We illustrate the MELS model with data on time to first cigarette measured every day for 7 days in smokers randomized to two groups: a) those asked to keep smoking, or b) those asked to stop. Our results show that some individuals remain very stable in their time to first cigarette over the week, while others show variable patterns. The stable individuals smoked every day, did not smoke immediately upon waking, and were all in the group asked to keep smoking. Conversely, the variable individuals had at least one day during which they did not smoke, other days during which they smoked within the first 5 min of waking, and they were almost all in the group asked to quit smoking. These findings suggested that MELS have the potential to provide insights on how people try to stop smoking. More importantly, this model can be applied to other clinically important outcomes such as time to relapse in a range of cessation programs.

Mixed-effects location and scale Tobit joint models for heterogeneous longitudinal data with skewness, detection limits, and measurement errors.

The joint modeling of mean and variance for longitudinal data is an active research area. This type of model has the advantage of accounting for heteroscedasticity commonly observed in between and within subject variations. Most of researches focus on improving the estimating efficiency but ignore many data features frequently encountered in practice. In this article, we develop a mixed-effects location scale joint model that concurrently accounts for longitudinal data with multiple features. Specifically, our joint model handles heterogeneity, skewness, limit of detection, measurement errors in covariates which are typically observed in the collection of longitudinal data from many studies. We employ a Bayesian approach for making inference on the joint model. The proposed model and method are applied to an AIDS study. Simulation studies are performed to assess the performance of the proposed method. Alternative models under different conditions are compared.