Effective growth hormone replacement with once-weekly somapacitan in Japanese children with growth hormone deficiency: Results from REAL4, a phase 3 clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Somapacitan is a long-acting growth hormone (GH) derivative developed for the treatment of GH deficiency (GHD). This study evaluates the efficacy and tolerability of somapacitan in Japanese children with GHD after 104 weeks of treatment and after switch from daily GH. DESIGN: Subanalysis on Japanese patients from a randomised, open-labelled, controlled parallel-group phase 3 trial (REAL4, NCT03811535). PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Thirty treatment-naïve patients were randomised 2:1 to somapacitan (0.16 mg/kg/week) or daily GH (0.034 mg/kg/day) up to Week 52, after which all patients received somapacitan. Height velocity (HV; cm/year) at Weeks 52 and 104 were the primary measurements. Additional assessments included HV SD score (SDS), height SDS, bone age, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) SDS, and observer-reported outcomes. RESULTS: At Week 52, observed mean HV was similar between treatment groups (10.3 vs. 9.8 cm/year for somapacitan and daily GH, respectively). Similar HVs between groups were also observed at Week 104: 7.4 cm/year after continuous somapacitan treatment (soma/soma) and 7.9 cm/year after 1-year somapacitan treatment following switch from daily GH (switch). Other height-related endpoints supported continuous growth. IGF-I SDS increased in both groups with mean IGF-I SDS within -2 and +2 during the study. Somapacitan was well tolerated, one mild injection site reaction was reported, with no reports of injection site pain. Patient preference questionnaires showed that most patients and their caregivers (90.9%) who switched treatment at Week 52 preferred once-weekly somapacitan over daily GH treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Somapacitan showed sustained efficacy in Japanese children with GHD over 104 weeks and for 52 weeks after switching from daily GH. Somapacitan was well tolerated and preferred over daily GH.

Effect of long-acting PEGylated growth hormone for catch-up growth in children with idiopathic short stature: a 2-year real-world retrospective cohort study.

Several evidence gaps exist regarding the use of long-acting polyethylene glycol recombinant human growth hormone (PEG-rhGH) in children with idiopathic short stature (ISS), particularly studies conducted in real-world settings, with long-term follow-up, involving varied dosing regimens, and in comparison with daily rhGH. The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and adherence of once-weekly PEG-rhGH for catch-up growth in children with prepubertal ISS compared to daily rhGH. A real-world retrospective cohort study was conducted in prepubertal children with ISS in China. Children who voluntarily received once-weekly PEG-rhGH or daily rhGH were included and were followed up for 2 years. Ninety-five children were included, 47 received PEG-rhGH 0.2-0.3 mg/kg weekly and 48 received daily rhGH. Outcome measures included effectiveness in catch-up growth, adverse events, and treatment adherence. Height velocity increased significantly in both groups during rhGH therapy. In children who received PEG-rhGH treatment, height velocity was 10.59 ± 1.37 cm/year and 8.75 ± 0.86 cm/year in the first and second year, respectively, which were significantly more than those who received daily rhGH (9.80 ± 1.05 cm/year, P = 0.002, and 8.03 ± 0.89 cm/year, P < 0.001). The height standard deviation score improved at the end of the second year for all children (P < 0.001). However, children who received PEG-rhGH showed more excellent improvement than those with daily rhGH (1.65 ± 0.38 vs. 1.50 ± 0.36, P = 0.001). In children who received PEG-rhGH, lower missed doses were observed than those with daily rhGH (0.75 ± 1.06 vs. 4.4 ± 2.0, P < 0.001). No serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: PEG-rhGH demonstrated superior effectiveness and adherence compared to daily rhGH in the treatment of children with ISS. The safety profiles were similar between the two treatments. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) has been used to increase adult height in children with idiopathic short stature (ISS), and its safety profile is comparable to other indications for growth hormone treatment. • The use of long-acting rhGH in children with ISS is still an area of uncertainty. WHAT IS NEW: • This 2-year real-world study provides new evidence that PEGylated rhGH (PEG-rhGH) is more effective than daily rhGH in promoting catch-up growth in children with ISS. • PEG-rhGH also demonstrated superior treatment adherence compared to daily rhGH in children with ISS. • The safety profiles of PEG-rhGH and daily rhGH were found to be similar.

Somapacitan-induced reversible lipoatrophy in an adult woman with hypopituitarism.

BACKGROUND: Lipoatrophy is rare adverse event (AE) in daily recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH). Data on lipoatrophy in newly developed long-acting GH (LAGH) are scarce. We report the first case of lipoatrophy in adult patient treated with LAGH somapacitan. CASE PRESENTATION: A 38-year-old woman with congenital panhypopituitarism was transitioned from daily rhGH 0.4 mg QD to somapacitan dose 4 mg QW due to non-adherence to daily rhGH. Despite adequate education and regular changing of injection sites, the patient reported reduced subcutaneous tissue at all four injection sites, after the 4th application of somapacitan. Somapacitan was discontinued at patient preference and lipoatrophy completely reversed after 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Lipoatrophy caused by somapacitan was completely reversible. We speculate that high initial dose and volume of somapacitan caused delayed diffusion and a direct local lipolytic effect in our patient. Although, titration of somapacitan was initiated as previously reported in REAL2 study protocol, recent clinical guidelines advise more gradual increase of somapacitan dose also in women on oral estogens that are switched from daily rhGH. Importantly, our case and the two previously described cases in children in the REAL 3 study showed that lipoatrophy caused by somapacitan was transient and completely reversible, and that discontinuation of the drug is not always mandatory.

Utilizing Somapacitan, a Long-acting Growth Hormone Formulation, for the Treatment of Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency: A Guide for Clinicians.

OBJECTIVE: Somapacitan is the first approved and currently the only long-acting growth hormone (GH) formulation in the United States for treatment of adults with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). The aim of this review was to provide a practical approach for clinicians on how to utilize somapacitan in the treatment of adults with GHD. METHODS: Literature search was performed on PubMed using key words, including adult GHD, long-acting growth hormone, somapacitan, treatment, and management. The discussion of treatment aspects utilizing somapacitan was based on evidence from previous clinical studies and personal experience. RESULTS: Clinical trial data demonstrated that somapacitan, a once-weekly reversible albumin-binding GH derivative, decreased truncal fat, improved visceral fat and lean body mass, increased insulin-like growth factor-I standard deviation score and exerted neutral effects on glucose metabolism. Overall, somapacitan was well-tolerated, adverse event rates were comparable with daily GH, antisomapacitan or anti-GH antibodies were not detected, and treatment satisfaction was in favor of somapacitan vs daily GH. CONCLUSION: Somapacitan is an efficacious, safe, convenient and well-tolerated once-weekly long-acting GH formulation that reduces the treatment burden of once-daily GH injections for adults with GHD. This article provides a review of the pharmacology of somapacitan and offers practical recommendations based on previous clinical trial data on how to initiate, dose titration, monitoring and dose adjustments whilst on therapy in adults with GHD. Timing of measurement of serum insulin-like growth factor-I levels, information on administration, recommendations on missed doses, and clinical recommendations on dosing in certain sub-population of patients are also discussed.

Efficacy, safety, quality of life, adherence and cost-effectiveness of long-acting growth hormone replacement therapy compared to daily growth hormone in children with growth hormone deficiency: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

We evaluated the efficacy, safety, adherence, quality of life (QoL) and cost-effectiveness of long-acting growth hormone (LAGH) vs daily growth hormone (GH) preparations in the treatment of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in children. Systematic searches were performed in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science up to July 2022 on randomized and non-randomized studies involving children with GHD receiving LAGH as compared to daily GH. Meta-analyses for efficacy and safety were performed comparing different LAGH/daily GH formulations. From the initial 1393 records, we included 16 studies for efficacy and safety, 8 studies for adherence and 2 studies for QoL. No studies reporting cost-effectiveness were found. Pooled mean differences of mean annualized height velocity (cm/year) showed no difference between LAGH and daily GH: Eutropin Plus® vs Eutropin® [- 0.14 (-0.43, 0.15)], Eutropin Plus® vs Genotropin® [- 0.74 (-1.83, 0.34)], Jintrolong® vs Jintropin AQ® [0.05 (-0.54, 0.65)], Somatrogon vs Genotropin® [- 1.40 (-2.91, 0.10)], TransCon vs Genotropin® [0.93 (0.26, 1.61)]. Also, other efficacy and safety outcomes, QoL and adherence were comparable for LAGH and daily GH. Our results showed that, although most of the included studies had some concerns for risk of bias, regarding efficacy and safety all the LAGH formulations were similar to daily GH. Future high quality studies are needed to confirm these data. Adherence and QoL should be addressed from real-world data studies for both the mid and long term and in a larger population. Cost-effectiveness studies are needed to measure the economic impact of LAGH from the healthcare payer's perspective.

GH and IGF-1 Replacement in Children.

In this chapter, we want to give an overview on what we have learned from more than 30 years ago on the use of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) and later recombinant human IGF-1 which was introduced for the treatment of short children and what are the safety issues concerned with this treatment. However, rhGH is used not solely in conditions where short stature is the consequence of GH deficiency but also in various disorders without a proven GH deficiency. In clinical studies, growth responses to various forms of rhGH therapy were analyzed, adding to our concept about the physiology of growth. Most patients under rhGH treatment show a considerable short-term effect; however, the long-term gain of height in a child obtained by a year-long treatment until final height remains controversial in some of the growth disorders that have been treated with rhGH or IGF-1. Today the first studies on the long-term safety of rhGH treatment have been published and raising some questions whether this treatment is similarly safe for all the patient groups treated with rhGH. Although there is a long-standing safety record for these hormone replacement therapies, in the face of the considerable costs involved, the discussion about the risk to benefit ratio is continuing. Newer developments of rhGH treatment include long-term preparations, which have only to be injected once a week. Although some of these drugs already have proven their non-inferiority to conventional rhGH treatment, we have to await further results to see whether they show improvements in treatment adherence of the patients and prove their long-term safety.

Somapacitan, a once-weekly reversible albumin-binding GH derivative, in children with GH deficiency: A randomized dose-escalation trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, local tolerability, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of escalating single doses of once-weekly somapacitan, a reversible, albumin-binding GH derivative, vs once-daily GH in children with GH deficiency (GHD). DESIGN: Phase 1, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, dose-escalation trial (NCT01973244). PATIENTS: Thirty-two prepubertal GH-treated children with GHD were sequentially randomized 3:1 within each of four cohorts to a single dose of somapacitan (0.02, 0.04, 0.08 and 0.16 mg/kg; n=6 each), or once-daily Norditropin® SimpleXx® (0.03 mg/kg; n=2 each) for 7 days. MEASUREMENTS: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles were assessed. RESULTS: Adverse events were all mild, and there were no apparent treatment-dependent patterns in type or frequency. Four mild transient injection site reactions were reported in three of 24 children treated with somapacitan. No antisomapacitan/anti-human growth hormone (hGH) antibodies were detected. Mean serum concentrations of somapacitan increased in a dose-dependent but nonlinear manner: maximum concentration ranged from 21.8 ng/mL (0.02 mg/kg dose) to 458.4 ng/mL (0.16 mg/kg dose). IGF-I and IGFBP-3, and change from baseline in IGF-I standard deviation score (SDS) and IGFBP-3 SDS, increased dose dependently; greatest changes in SDS values were seen for 0.16 mg/kg. IGF-I SDS values were between -2 and +2 SDS, except for peak IGF-I SDS with 0.08 mg/kg somapacitan. Postdosing, IGF-I SDS remained above baseline levels for at least 1 week. CONCLUSIONS: Single doses of once-weekly somapacitan (0.02-0.16 mg/kg) were well tolerated in children with GHD, with IGF-I profiles supporting a once-weekly treatment profile. No clinically significant safety/tolerability signals or immunogenicity concerns were identified.

Somatrogon injection for the treatment of pediatric growth hormone deficiency with comparison to other LAGH products.

INTRODUCTION: Somatrogon (NGENLA™) is a long-acting GH (LAGH) formulation that was approved in Canada in October 2021 for the treatment of pediatric growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Somatrogon has also received approval in Australia, Japan, the European Union, the USA, and the UK. Somatrogon is a glycoprotein that utilizes three copies of the C-terminal peptide of human chorionic gonadotropin to delay its clearance allowing for once-weekly administration. AREAS COVERED: The purpose of this article is to describe the development of somatrogon for treatment of individuals with GHD. Trials of somatrogon demonstrated positive efficacy results in adults (Phase 2) and children (Phase 2 and 3) with GHD including non-inferiority of height velocity compared to daily GH, with no concerning side effects. Growth responses, pharmacodynamics and safety data are compared to other LAGH products, lonapegsomatropin and somapacitan, in Phase 3 trials in pediatric GHD. EXPERT OPINION: New LAGH products, including somatrogon, have the potential to increase patient adherence as well as improve quality of life and clinical outcomes. Clinicians will need to identify the best candidates for LAGH therapy and understand how to safely monitor and adjust therapy. Long-term surveillance studies are necessary to demonstrate adherence, efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and safety of LAGH preparations.

Long-acting Growth Hormone Therapy, Rational and Future Aspects.

Recombinant growth hormone (GH) is administered as daily subcutaneous injections. Daily treatment can be challenging for children/adolescents as well as for parents and/or caregivers (legal representatives, guardians of children in institutional care). Challenges associated with daily treatment may result in missing several doses and non-adherence with treatment leads to inadequate growth response. As an inadequate growth response does not meet criteria for continuing treatment, payers (commercial or public) may decide to end reimbursement. Novel long-acting GH formulations (LAGH) with extended half-life can be administered less frequently and target to improve patient convenience and consequently to improve adherence and responses to treatment. LAGH formulations can restore growth velocity and body composition as effectively as daily treatment, without unexpected adverse effects as reported in randomized clinical trials.

Health-related quality of life in pre-pubertal children with pediatric growth hormone deficiency: 12-month results from a phase 3 clinical trial of once-weekly somatrogon versus once-daily somatropin.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment of pediatric growth hormone deficiency (pGHD) with daily injection of recombinant human growth hormone (somatropin) aims to increase height velocity and improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The Quality of Life in Short Stature Youth (QoLISSY) questionnaire was administered in a phase 3 clinical trial that evaluated efficacy and safety of once-weekly somatrogon versus once-daily somatropin in children with pGHD (ClinicalTrials.gov no NCT02968004). METHODS: Treatment-naïve prepubertal children with pGHD received once-weekly somatrogon or once-daily somatropin for 12 months. The QoLISSY core module (physical/social/emotional subscales) was administered at baseline and 12 months after treatment initiation. QoLISSY-Parent was completed by parents/caregivers of children <7 years old and some parents/caregivers of children ≥7 years old; children ≥7 years old self-completed QoLISSY-Child. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups (N = 117). Among children <7 years old, QoLISSY-Parent total and subscale scores showed similarly improved HRQoL at 12 months relative to baseline in both treatment groups. Self-reported QoLISSY-Child total and subscale scores in children ≥7 years old indicated HRQoL improvements at 12 months that were numerically better with somatrogon than somatropin (similar results with QoLISSY-Parent in this age group). At both time points, children reported better HRQoL than perceived by their parents/caregivers. CONCLUSION: Treatment for 12 months with once-weekly somatrogon or once-daily somatropin resulted in comparable improvements in HRQoL among children with pGHD. Lower HRQoL perceived by parents/caregivers possibly reflect children's tendency to emphasize adaptation. These results suggest that evaluation of HRQoL could help support treatment decisions in children with pGHD treated with growth hormone.

Pediatric growth hormone deficiency is a condition that causes slow growth. Children with this condition have height that is lower than normal unless the condition is treated. The slow growth and short height may have bad effects on the emotional and social well-being of these children. Treatment usually consists of a growth hormone that is administered by daily injection under the skin over a period of years. However, children and their parents may not like these daily injections and often stop treatment. A newer treatment is available that can be injected once weekly. This newer treatment increases growth the same as daily injections. We looked at whether 12 months of treatment given once a week has the same positive effects on the physical, social, and emotional health of children as the daily treatment. Children and their parents answered questions that asked how being short affects the physical, social, and emotional parts of their life. These questions were asked before starting treatment and 12 months after starting treatment. In children younger than 7 years old, improvements at 12 months in their physical, social, and emotional health were similar between the treatments. In children 7 years old or older, those who received the once-weekly injections had slightly better improvements than those who received the daily injections. These results can help parents and doctors make decisions about treating children with pediatric growth hormone deficiency.

Gene Expression Signatures Predict First-Year Response to Somapacitan Treatment in Children With Growth Hormone Deficiency.

CONTEXT: The pretreatment blood transcriptome predicts growth response to daily growth hormone (GH) therapy with high accuracy. OBJECTIVE: Investigate response prediction using pretreatment transcriptome in children with GH deficiency (GHD) treated with once-weekly somapacitan, a novel long-acting GH. METHODS: REAL4 is a randomized, multinational, open-label, active-controlled parallel group phase 3 trial, comprising a 52-week main phase and an ongoing 3-year safety extension (NCT03811535). A total of 128/200 treatment-naïve prepubertal children with GHD consented to baseline blood transcriptome profiling. They were randomized 2:1 to subcutaneous somapacitan (0.16 mg/kg/week) or daily GH (0.034 mg/kg/day). Differential RNA-seq analysis and machine learning were used to predict therapy response. RESULTS: 121/128 samples passed quality control. Children treated with somapacitan (n = 76) or daily GH (n = 45) were categorized based on fastest and slowest growing quartiles at week 52. Prediction of height velocity (HV; cm/year) was excellent for both treatments (out of bag [OOB] area under curve [AUC]: 0.98-0.99; validation AUC: 0.83-0.84), as was prediction of secondary markers of growth response: HV standard deviation score (SDS) (0.99-1.0; 0.75-0.78), change from baseline height SDS (ΔHSDS) (0.98-1.0; 0.61-0.75), and change from baseline insulin-like growth factor-I SDS (ΔIGF-I SDS) (0.96-1.0; 0.85-0.88). Genes previously identified as predictive of GH therapy response were consistently better at predicting the fastest growers in both treatments in this study (OOB AUC: 0.93-0.97) than the slowest (0.67-0.85). CONCLUSION: Pretreatment transcriptome predicts first-year growth response in somapacitan-treated children with GHD. A common set of genes can predict the treatment response to both once-weekly somapacitan and conventional daily GH. This approach could potentially be developed into a clinically applicable pretreatment test to improve clinical management.

Developments in the Management of Growth Hormone Deficiency: Clinical Utility of Somapacitan.

Growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy for growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in children and adults has for over 25 years, until recently, been administered as daily injections. This daily treatment regimen often incurs a burden to patients and caregivers, leading to high rates of non-adherence and, consequently, decreased treatment efficacy outcomes. To address this shortcoming, long-acting growth hormones (LAGHs) have been developed with the aim of reducing the burden of daily injections, thereby potentially improving treatment adherence and outcomes. Somapacitan (Sogroya®) (Novo Nordisk, Bagsværd, Denmark) is a LAGH currently approved for the treatment of adult and childhood GHD (AGHD and CGHD, respectively) in several countries. Other LAGHs, such as somatrogon (Ngenla®) (Pfizer, New York, United States) and lonapegsomatropin/TransCon GH (Skytrofa®) (Ascendis Pharma, Copenhagen, Denmark), are also currently approved and available for the treatment of CGHD in several countries. In this review, we will consider the method of protraction, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD), efficacy, and safety results of somapacitan in adult and pediatric trials and how these characteristics differ from those of the other aforementioned LAGHs. Additionally, the administration of somapacitan and timing of measurement of serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels are summarized. Information on administration, advice on missed doses, and clinical guidelines are discussed, as well as identifying which patients are suitable for somapacitan therapy, and how to monitor and adjust dosing whilst on therapy.

Long-acting growth hormone in the management of GHD in France.

Approximately 10,000 children in France with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) are being administered daily recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH). Although this treatment has long proved efficient for restoring children's growth and metabolism, daily injections of rhGH have a few limitations, such as difficulties in terms of adherence to treatment, which may compromise growth during childhood but also metabolism in adulthood. In addition to the disease burden and besides the adherence hurdles, the obligations related to daily injection have a negative impact on the quality of life of patients and their families. The hypothesis that injections administered at intervals of 1 week, or even 1 month, could improve compliance, reduce treatment discontinuations, and optimize quality of life and therapeutic effectiveness has led to the emergence of new long-acting growth hormone (LAGH). Recent access to LAGHs (somatrogon MA) on the European and French market will likely be followed by a high demand from the families concerned and may raise questions on their effectiveness, safety, and practical use. Numerous practical and practice-related points are needed to guide prescribing physicians while many concerns are still left unresolved (treatment effectiveness or ineffectiveness endpoints, long-term effectiveness, etc.). These issues can only be addressed in the future by compiling registries and conducting long-term real-world studies.

Somapacitan in children born small for gestational age: a multi-centre, open-label, controlled phase 2 study.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 3 once-weekly somapacitan doses compared with daily growth hormone (GH) administration in short children born small for gestational age (SGA). DESIGN: Randomised, multi-centre, open-label, controlled phase 2 study comprising a 26-week main phase and a 4-year extension (NCT03878446). The study was conducted at 38 sites across 12 countries. 26-week main phase results are presented here.Sixty-two GH treatment-naïve, prepubertal short children born SGA were randomised and exposed; 61 completed the main phase. Three somapacitan doses (0.16 [n = 12], 0.20 [n = 13], 0.24 [n = 12] mg/kg/week) and 2 daily GH doses (0.035 [n = 12], 0.067 [n = 13] mg/kg/day) were administered subcutaneously. RESULTS: After 26 weeks of treatment, the estimated mean annualised height velocity (HV) was 8.9, 11.0, and 11.3 cm/year for somapacitan 0.16, 0.20, and 0.24 mg/kg/week, respectively, compared to 10.3 and 11.9 cm/year for daily GH 0.035 and 0.067 mg/kg/day. Changes from baseline in HV standard deviation score (SDS), height SDS, and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) SDS showed similar dose-dependent responses. Exposure-response modelling indicated the greatest efficacy correlated with the highest somapacitan exposure. Similar safety and tolerability were demonstrated for all weekly somapacitan and daily GH doses. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the totality of data on improvements in height-based parameters combined with exposure-response analyses, somapacitan 0.24 mg/kg/week appears most efficacious, providing similar efficacy, safety, and tolerability as daily GH 0.067 mg/kg/day in short children born SGA after 26 weeks of treatment.

Comparing treatment with daily and long-acting growth hormone formulations in adults with growth hormone deficiency: Challenging issues, benefits, and risks.

Daily administration of growth hormone (GH) treatment has been in clinical use for treatment for GH deficiency (GHD) in adults for more than 30 years. Numerous studies have demonstrated evidence that GH treatment improves body composition, cardiovascular risk factors and quality of life with few side effects. Less frequent GH injections are hypothesized to improve adherence and several long-acting GH (LAGH) formulations have been developed and a few have been approved and marketed. Different pharmacological modifications have been applied and the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of LAGH are different to each other and to those of daily injections and require different dosing and monitoring specific for each LAGH. Studies have shown improved adherence with LAGH, and short-term efficacy and side effects are comparable between daily GH injections and LAGHs. Long-term treatment with daily GH injections is effective and safe, while long-term studies for LAGHs are awaited. In this review challenges, benefits, and risks of treatment with daily and long-acting GH preparations will be compared.

Safety of long-term use of daily and long-acting growth hormone in growth hormone-deficient adults on cancer risk.

Daily injections of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) have been used in clinical practice for almost four decades as a replacement therapy in adult patients with GH deficiency (GHD). Long-term adherence to daily injections of rhGH is a clinical concern that may result in reduced therapeutic efficacy, and long-acting GH (LAGH) formulations have been developed in an attempt of overcoming this problem. Long-term safety issues of rhGH are the other side of the coin that has been carefully monitored over the years, particularly related to the proliferative actions of GH that could increase the risk of tumor recurrence or induce the development of new benign and malignant tumors. In this review, we present what is currently known about the cancer risk in GHD adults treated with daily rhGH injections and we discuss the major concerns and responses needed from future surveillance studies regarding the safety of LAGH preparations.

Long-term Pegylated GH for Children With GH Deficiency: A Large, Prospective, Real-world Study.

CONTEXT: The evidence of long-term polyethylene glycol recombinant human GH (PEG-rhGH) in pediatric GH deficiency (GHD) is limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the effectiveness and safety of long-term PEG-rhGH in children with GHD in the real world, as well as to examine the effects of dose on patient outcomes. DESIGN: A prospective, observational, posttrial study (NCT03290235). SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTION: Children with GHD were enrolled from 81 centers in China in 4 individual clinical trials and received weekly 0.2 mg/kg/wk (high-dose) or 0.1 to <0.2 mg/kg/wk (low-dose) PEG-rhGH for 30 months. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Height SD score (Ht SDS) at 12, 24, and 36 months. RESULTS: A total of 1170 children were enrolled in this posttrial study, with 642 patients in the high-dose subgroup and 528 in the low-dose subgroup. The Ht SDS improved significantly after treatment in the total population (P < 0.0001), with a mean change of 0.53 ± 0.30, 0.89 ± 0.48, 1.35 ± 0.63, 1.63 ± 0.75 at 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months, respectively. In addition, the changes in Ht SDS from baseline were significantly improved in the high-dose subgroup compared with the low-dose subgroup at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after treatment (all P < 0.05). A total of 12 (1.03%) patients developed serious adverse events. There was no serious adverse event related to the treatment, and no AEs leading to treatment discontinuation or death occurred. CONCLUSIONS: PEG-rhGH showed long-term effectiveness and safety in treating children with GHD. Both dose subgroups showed promising outcomes, whereas PEG-rhGH 0.2 mg/kg/wk might show additional benefit.

Effective GH Replacement With Somapacitan in Children With GHD: REAL4 2-year Results and After Switch From Daily GH.

CONTEXT: Somapacitan is a long-acting GH derivative for treatment of GH deficiency (GHD). OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of somapacitan in children with GHD after 2 years of treatment and after the switch from daily GH. DESIGN: A randomized, multinational, open-labelled, controlled parallel group phase 3 trial, comprising a 52-week main phase and 3-year safety extension (NCT03811535). SETTING: Eighty-five sites across 20 countries. PATIENTS: A total of 200 treatment-naïve prepubertal patients were randomized and exposed; 194 completed the 2-year period. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized 2:1 to somapacitan (0.16 mg/kg/wk) or daily GH (0.034 mg/kg/d) during the first year, after which all patients received somapacitan 0.16 mg/kg/wk. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Height velocity (HV; cm/year) at week 104. Additional assessments included HV SD score (SDS), height SDS, IGF-I SDS, and observer-reported outcomes. RESULTS: HV was sustained in both groups between 52 and 104 weeks. At week 104, mean (SD) for HV between weeks 52 and 104 was 8.4 (1.5) cm/year after continuous somapacitan treatment and 8.7 (1.8) cm/year after 1 year of somapacitan treatment following switch from daily GH. Secondary height-related endpoints also supported sustained growth. Mean IGF-I SDS during year 2 was similar between groups and within normal range (-2 to +2). Somapacitan was well tolerated, with no safety or tolerability issues identified. GH patient preference questionnaire results show that most patients and their caregivers (90%) who switched treatment at year 2 preferred once-weekly somapacitan over daily GH treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Somapacitan in children with GHD showed sustained efficacy and tolerability for 2 years, and after switching from daily GH. Patients/caregivers switching from daily GH expressed a preference for somapacitan. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03811535.

Long-Acting Growth Hormone Preparations and Their Use in Children with Growth Hormone Deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Daily recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) is approved and marketed worldwide to treat children and adults with GH deficiency and other conditions. Efficacy of rhGH therapy is influenced by several variables. Drop of treatment adherence over time has been recognized as a cause of reduced rhGH efficacy and has driven considerable efforts from pharmaceutical companies and scientists to develop long-acting rhGH (LAGH) formulations in order to relieve patients and their families from the burden of daily injections. SUMMARY: Different technologies to manipulate drug release have been produced allowing weekly, biweekly, or monthly rhGH administration. The LAGH formulations developed at present have demonstrated a comparable or even higher efficacy as compared with daily rhGH in most of the cases and no major safety issues in phase 3 studies. A greater incidence of injection-site reactions has been reported but mainly of mild and transient nature. KEY MESSAGES: Despite LAGH analogs appearing promising, potential drawbacks still need to be addressed. Long-term consequences of nonphysiological GH profile and its consequences on metabolism and risk of cancer, optimal therapeutic monitoring, immunogenicity of LAGH molecules, and potential novel side effects related to the technologies used to develop these molecules are among the major concerns that require answers from long-term surveillance. Finally, increased acceptance of LAGH formulations from patients and their caregivers is yet to be demonstrated and cost-effectiveness evaluated consequently.

Impact of long-acting growth hormone replacement therapy in adult growth hormone deficiency: Comparison between adolescent, adult, and elderly patients.

The predominant features of the adult growth hormone deficiency (GHD) syndrome may vary between patients of different age and age of onset of GHD. Evidence from clinical trials and long-term observational studies has informed our ability to understand the unique considerations regarding risks and benefits of daily growth hormone replacement therapy (GHRT) and specific dosing and monitoring strategies for these patient subgroups. High rates of nonadherence with daily GHRT presents a challenge to achieving optimal treatment outcomes and long-acting growth hormone (LAGH) formulations have been developed with the promise of improving treatment adherence resulting in improved therapeutic outcomes. While existing data from short-term studies have demonstrated noninferiority of efficacy and safety of LAGH compared to daily GHRT, long-term studies are needed to assess the full spectrum of outcomes of interest and long-term safety considerations specific to patients in adolescence, adulthood and the elderly GHD population. Since each LAGH formulation has a unique pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile optimal dosing and monitoring strategies will need to be developed to allow for the provision of individualized patient treatment.