Impact of Healthy Lifestyle in Patients With Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

Background: Pathogenic mutations are associated with poor outcomes in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). However, data on the effects of a healthy lifestyle on FH phenotypes are limited. Objectives: The authors investigated the interaction between a healthy lifestyle and FH mutation with prognosis in patients with FH. Methods: We investigated the associations of the interaction between genotypes and lifestyle, with the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), such as cardiovascular-related mortality, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and coronary artery revascularization, in patients with FH. We assessed their lifestyle based on 4 questionnaires (healthy dietary pattern, regular exercise, not smoking, and absence of obesity). The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the risk for MACE. Results: The median follow-up duration was 12.6 (IQR: 9.5-17.9) years. During the follow-up duration, 179 MACE were observed. Independent of classic risk factors, FH mutation and lifestyle score were significantly associated with MACE (HR: 2.73; 95% CI: 1.03-4.43; P = 0.02; and HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.40-0.98, P = 0.033, respectively). The estimated risk of coronary artery disease by 75 years of age varied according to lifestyle, ranging from 21.0% among noncarriers with a favorable lifestyle to 32.1% among noncarriers with an unfavorable lifestyle and ranging from 29.0% among carriers with a favorable lifestyle to 55.4% among carriers with an unfavorable lifestyle. Conclusions: A healthy lifestyle was associated with reduced risk for MACE among patients with FH with or without genetic diagnosis.

Comparison of Different Types of Drug-Eluting Stents for De Novo Long Coronary Artery Lesions.

Background: Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for diffuse long lesions remain relatively unfavorable. Prior clinical trials investigated the relative efficacy and safety of different types of drug-eluting stents (DES) in long lesions. Objectives: This study sought to compare the relative performance of different types of DES for de novo long (≥25 mm) coronary artery lesions. Methods: Using a pooled analysis of individual data of 1,450 patients from 3 randomized clinical trials, we compared angiographic and clinical outcomes of 5 different types of DES: 224 patients with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (EES), 255 with platinum-chromium EES, 250 with Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents, 245 with biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents, and 476 with first-generation sirolimus-eluting stents (SES). The primary endpoint was in-segment late lumen loss at 9 months. Results: The primary endpoint was not significantly different between 4 second-generation DES and 1 first-generation SES (0.17 ± 0.41 mm in cobalt-chromium EES; 0.11 ± 0.37 in platinum-chromium EES: 0.14 ± 0.38 in Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents; 0.14 ± 0.38 in biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents; or 0.10 ± 0.37 in SES, respectively, overall P = 0.38). Also, there were no significant between-group differences with respect to death, myocardial infarction, target-vessel revascularization, or stent thrombosis at 12 months. In the multiple treatment propensity-score analysis, the risk of angiographic and clinical outcomes was also similar among several types of DES. Conclusions: In this patient-level pooled analysis, several second-generation DES showed similar angiographic and clinical outcomes in patients with de novo long coronary lesions. (Percutaneous Treatment of LONG Native Coronary Lesions With Drug-Eluting Stent-III [LONG-DES-III]; NCT01078038; Percutaneous Treatment of LONG Native Coronary Lesions With Drug-Eluting Stent-IV [LONG-DES-IV]; NCT01186094; and Everolimus-eluting [PROMUS-ELEMENT] vs. Biolimus A9-Eluting [NOBORI] Stents for Long-Coronary Lesions [LONG-DES-V]; NCT01186120).

Stent Expansion Indexes to Predict Clinical Outcomes: An IVUS Substudy From ADAPT-DES.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate various stent expansion indexes to determine the best predictor of clinical outcomes. BACKGROUND: Numerous intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) studies have shown minimum stent area (MSA) to be the most powerful predictor of future events. METHODS: ADAPT-DES (Assessment of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Drug-Eluting Stents) was a prospective, multicenter registry of 8,582 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents. Native coronary artery lesions treated with IVUS-guided PCI with final analyzable IVUS were included. Ten stent expansion indexes (MSA, MSA/vessel area at MSA site, conventional stent expansion [MSA/average of proximal and distal reference luminal area], minimum stent expansion using Huo-Kassab or linear model accounting for vessel tapering, stent asymmetry [minimum/maximum stent diameter within the entire stent], stent eccentricity [smallest minimum/maximum stent diameter at a single slice within the stent], IVUS-XPL [Impact of intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on Outcomes of Xience Prime Stents in Long Lesions] criteria, ULTIMATE [Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Drug Eluting Stents Implantation in "All-Comers" Coronary Lesions] criteria, and ILUMIEN IV criteria) were evaluated for their associations with lesion-specific 2-year clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or definite stent thrombosis. RESULTS: Overall, 2,140 lesions in 1,831 patients were included; final MSA measured 6.2 ± 2.4 mm2. Among the 10 stent expansion indexes, only MSA/vessel area at the MSA site was independently associated with 2-year clinically driven TLR or definite stent thrombosis (hazard ratio: 0.77; 95% confidence interval: 0.59-0.99; P = 0.04) after adjusting for morphologic and procedural parameters. CONCLUSIONS: In this IVUS-guided PCI cohort with excellent final MSA overall, stent/vessel area at the MSA site, an index of relative stent expansion, was superior to absolute MSA and other expansion indexes in predicting 2-year clinically driven TLR or definite stent thrombosis.

Loop Diuretics Inhibit Renal Excretion of Trimethylamine N-Oxide.

This study demonstrates, for the first time, that renal tubular excretion of trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) is inhibited by concomitant loop diuretic administration. The observed marked accumulation in the renal parenchyma, and to lesser extent, plasma, implies differential distributions of TMAO across various tissues and/or systems as a consequence of efflux channel control. A better understanding of TMAO renal clearance and its potential interactions with current and future therapies in patients with heart failure are warranted.

Physiology-Based Revascularization: A New Approach to Plan and Optimize Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Coronary physiological assessment using fractional flow reserve or nonhyperemic pressure ratios has become a standard of care for patients with coronary atherosclerotic disease. However, most evidence has focused on the pre-interventional use of physiological assessment to aid revascularization decision-making, whereas post-interventional physiological assessment has not been well established. Although evidence for supporting the role of post-interventional physiological assessment to optimize immediate revascularization results and long-term prognosis has been reported, a more thorough understanding of these data is crucial in incorporating post-interventional physiological assessment into daily practice. Recent scientific efforts have also focused on the potential role of pre-interventional fractional flow reserve or nonhyperemic pressure ratio pullback tracings to characterize patterns of coronary atherosclerotic disease to better predict post-interventional physiological outcomes, and thereby identify the appropriate revascularization target. Pre-interventional pullback tracings with dedicated post-processing methods can provide characterization of focal versus diffuse disease or major gradient versus minor gradient stenosis, which would result in different post-interventional physiological results. This review provides a comprehensive look at the current evidence regarding the evolving role of physiological assessment as a functional optimization tool for the entire process of revascularization, and not merely as a pre-interventional tool for revascularization decision-making.

Length of Stay After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: An Analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to investigate the trends, predictors, and outcomes of delayed discharge (>72 h) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. BACKGROUND: Length of stay post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement may have significant clinical and administrative implications. METHODS: Data from the Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry were used to identify patients undergoing nonaborted transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement who survived to discharge, and data linked from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services were used to provide 1-year events. Patients were categorized to early discharge (≤72 h) versus delayed discharge (>72 h). The trends, predictors, and adjusted 1-year outcomes were compared in both groups. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2015, a total of 13,389 patients (55.1%) were discharged within 72 h, whereas 10,896 patients (44.9%) were discharged beyond 72 h. There was a significant decline in rates of delayed discharge across the study period (62% vs. 34%; p < 0.01). This remained unchanged when stratified by Transcatheter Valve Therapy risk scores. Several factors were identified as independent predictors of early and delayed discharge. After adjustment for in-hospital complications, delayed discharge was an independent predictor of 1-year all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 1.45; 95% confidence interval: 1.30 to 1.60; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of delayed discharge have declined from 2011 to 2015. Delayed discharge is associated with a significant increase in mortality even after adjusting for in-hospital complications. Further work is necessary to determine if predictors of early discharge could be used to develop length of stay scores that might be instrumental in administrative, financial, or clinical policy development.

Prognostic Value of Combined Clinical and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Data Using Machine Learning.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the added predictive value of combining clinical information and myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging (MPI) data using machine learning (ML) to predict major adverse cardiac events (MACE). BACKGROUND: Traditionally, prognostication by MPI has relied on visual or quantitative analysis of images without objective consideration of the clinical data. ML permits a large number of variables to be considered in combination and at a level of complexity beyond the human clinical reader. METHODS: A total of 2,619 consecutive patients (48% men; 62 ± 13 years of age) who underwent exercise (38%) or pharmacological stress (62%) with high-speed SPECT MPI were monitored for MACE. Twenty-eight clinical variables, 17 stress test variables, and 25 imaging variables (including total perfusion deficit [TPD]) were recorded. Areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) for MACE prediction were compared among: 1) ML with all available data (ML-combined); 2) ML with only imaging data (ML-imaging); 3) 5-point scale visual diagnosis (physician [MD] diagnosis); and 4) automated quantitative imaging analysis (stress TPD and ischemic TPD). ML involved automated variable selection by information gain ranking, model building with a boosted ensemble algorithm, and 10-fold stratified cross validation. RESULTS: During follow-up (3.2 ± 0.6 years), 239 patients (9.1%) had MACE. MACE prediction was significantly higher for ML-combined than ML-imaging (AUC: 0.81 vs. 0.78; p < 0.01). ML-combined also had higher predictive accuracy compared with MD diagnosis, automated stress TPD, and automated ischemic TPD (AUC: 0.81 vs. 0.65 vs. 0.73 vs. 0.71, respectively; p < 0.01 for all). Risk reclassification for ML-combined compared with visual MD diagnosis was 26% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ML combined with both clinical and imaging data variables was found to have high predictive accuracy for 3-year risk of MACE and was superior to existing visual or automated perfusion assessments. ML could allow integration of clinical and imaging data for personalized MACE risk computations in patients undergoing SPECT MPI.

Impact of TCFA on Unanticipated Ischemic Events in Medically Treated Diabetes Mellitus: Insights From the PROSPECT Study.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the relationship between thin-cap fibroatheromas (TCFAs) on major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) arising from medically treated nonculprit lesions (NCLs) in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). BACKGROUND: MACEs occur frequently in patients with DM and ACS. The impact of plaque composition on subsequent MACEs in DM patients with ACS is unknown. METHODS: In the PROSPECT (Providing Regional Observations Study Predictors of Events in the Coronary Tree) study, using 3-vessel radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound, we analyzed the incidence of NCL-MACE in 2 propensity-matched groups according to the presence of DM and TCFA. RESULTS: Among 697 patients, 119 (17.7%) had DM. The 3-year total MACE rate (29.4% vs. 18.8%; p = 0.01) was significantly higher in patients with versus without DM, driven by a higher rate of NCL-MACE in DM (18.7% vs. 10.4%; p = 0.02). Propensity score matching generated 2 balanced groups with and without DM of 82 patients each. Among DM patients, the presence of ≥1 TCFA was associated with higher NCL-MACE at 3 years (27.8% vs. 8.9% in patients without a TCFA, hazard ratio: 3.56; 95% confidence interval: 0.98 to 12.96; p = 0.04). DM patients without a TCFA had a similar 3-year rate of NCL-MACE as patients without DM (8.9% vs. 8.9%; hazard ratio: 1.09; 95% confidence interval: 0.27 to 4.41; p = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: ACS patients with DM and ≥1 TCFA have a high rate of NCL-MACE at 3 years. In contrast, the prognosis of ACS patients with DM but no TCFAs is favorable and similar to patients without DM.

Short- versus long-term dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation: an individual patient data pairwise and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials comparing short- (≤6 months) with long-term (≥1 year) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after drug-eluting stent(s) (DES) placement have been insufficiently powered to detect significant differences in the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare clinical outcomes between short- (≤6 months) and long-term (1 year) DAPT and among 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year of DAPT post-DES placement by performing an individual patient data pairwise and network meta-analysis. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials comparing DAPT durations after DES placement were searched through the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases and in international meeting proceedings. The primary study outcome was 1-year risk of MACE (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or definite/probable stent thrombosis). RESULTS: Four trials including 8,180 randomized patients were identified. At 1-year follow-up, short-term DAPT was associated with similar rates of MACE (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.86 to 1.43; p = 0.44), but significantly lower rates of bleeding (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.94; p = 0.03) versus prolonged DAPT. Comparable results were apparent in the landmark period between DAPT discontinuation and 1-year follow-up (for MACE: HR: 1.20; 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.89; p = 0.42) (for bleeding: HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.91; p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in 1-year rates of MACE among 3-month versus 1-year DAPT, 6-month versus 1-year DAPT, or 3-month versus 6-month DAPT. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with prolonged DAPT, short-term DAPT is associated with similar rates of MACE but lower rates of bleeding after DES placement.

Relation Between Bioresorbable Scaffold Sizing Using QCA-Dmax and Clinical Outcomes at 1 Year in 1,232 Patients From 3 Study Cohorts (ABSORB Cohort B, ABSORB EXTEND, and ABSORB II).

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the clinical outcomes based on the assessment of quantitative coronary angiography-maximal lumen diameter (Dmax). BACKGROUND: Assessment of pre-procedural Dmax of proximal and distal sites has been used for Absorb scaffold size selection in the ABSORB studies. METHODS: A total of 1,248 patients received Absorb scaffolds in the ABSORB Cohort B (ABSORB Clinical Investigation, Cohort B) study (N = 101), ABSORB EXTEND (ABSORB EXTEND Clinical Investigation) study (N = 812), and ABSORB II (ABSORB II Randomized Controlled Trial) trial (N = 335). The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (a composite of cardiac death, any myocardial infarction [MI], and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) was analyzed according to the Dmax subclassification of scaffold oversize group versus scaffold nonoversize group. RESULTS: Of 1,248 patients, pre-procedural Dmax was assessed in 1,232 patients (98.7%). In 649 (52.7%) patients, both proximal and distal Dmax values were smaller than the nominal size of the implanted scaffold (scaffold oversize group), whereas in 583 (47.3%) of patients, the proximal and/or distal Dmax were larger than the implanted scaffold (scaffold nonoversize group). The rates of MACE and MI at 1 year were significantly higher in the scaffold oversize group than in the scaffold nonoversize group (MACE 6.6% vs. 3.3%; log-rank p < 0.01, all MI: 4.6% vs. 2.4%; log-rank p = 0.04), mainly driven by a higher MI rate within 1 month post-procedure (3.5% vs. 1.9%; p = 0.08). The independent MACE determinants were both Dmax smaller than the scaffold nominal size (odds ratio [OR]: 2.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22 to 3.70; p < 0.01) and the implantation of overlapping scaffolds (OR: 2.10, 95% CI: 1.17 to 3.80; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of an oversized Absorb scaffold in a relatively small vessel appears to be associated with a higher 1-year MACE rate driven by more frequent early MI. (ABSORB Clinical Investigation, Cohort B [ABSORB Cohort B], NCT00856856; ABSORB EXTEND Clinical Investigation [ABSORB EXTEND], NCT01023789; ABSORB II Randomized Controlled Trial [ABSORB II], NCT01425281).

Acetylcholine-Provoked Coronary Spasm at Site of Significant Organic Stenosis Predicts Poor Prognosis in Patients With Coronary Vasospastic Angina.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery spasm contributes to the pathogenesis of variant angina and ischemic heart disease and may play a role in the progression of atherosclerosis. It is unclear whether the location of spasm is related to outcome. OBJECTIVES: This study compared the clinical features and prognosis of patients with coronary spasm at the site of significant atherosclerotic stenosis with patients with spasm at sites without stenosis or nonsignificant stenosis. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational study of 1,877 consecutive patients with typical or atypical angina-like chest pain undergoing acetylcholine (ACh)-provocation testing. A total of 1,760 patients were eligible for analysis. ACh-provoked coronary spasm and significant organic stenosis were observed in 873 and 358 patients, respectively. RESULTS: In patients with significant atherosclerotic stenosis, ACh-positive patients (n = 233) were younger and without diabetes mellitus compared with nonspasm patients (n = 125). In patients without organic stenosis, ACh-positive patients (n = 640) were older, had dyslipidemia, and were more likely to have a family history of ischemic heart disease than nonspasm patients (n = 762). Multiple logistic regression analysis identified ST-segment elevation during anginal attacks, organic stenosis of the left anterior descending artery, and multivessel spasm as correlates of spasm at sites of significant organic stenosis (n = 192). Multivariate analysis identified ACh-provoked spasm at the site of significant stenosis and use of nitrates as the 2 prognostic factors for major adverse cardiac events. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical features and prognosis of patients with ACh-provoked coronary spasm were different when it occurred at the site of significant atherosclerotic stenosis compared with patients with spasm elsewhere. Both spasm at the site of significant organic stenosis and nitrate use were significant predictors of major adverse cardiac events.

Clinical Outcome After DK Crush Versus Culotte Stenting of Distal Left Main Bifurcation Lesions: The 3-Year Follow-Up Results of the DKCRUSH-III Study.

OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to investigate the difference in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 3 years after double-kissing (DK) crush versus culotte stenting for unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions (LMDBLs). BACKGROUND: The multicenter and randomized DKCRUSH-III (Comparison of double kissing crush versus culotte stenting for unprotected distal left main bifurcation lesions: results from a multicenter, randomized, prospective study) showed that DK crush stenting was associated with fewer MACE at 1-year follow-up in patients with LMDBLs compared with culotte stenting. Here, we report the 3-year clinical outcome of the DKCRUSH-III study. METHODS: A total of 419 patients with LMDBLs who were randomly assigned to either the DK crush or culotte group in the DKCRUSH-III study were followed for 3 year. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a MACE at 3 years. Stent thrombosis (ST) was the safety endpoint. Patients were classified by simple and complex LMDBLs according to the DEFINITION (Definition and Impact of Complex Bifurcation Lesions on Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Drug-Eluting Stents) study criteria. RESULTS: At 3 years, MACE occurred in 49 patients the culotte group and in 17 patients in the DK crush group (cumulative event rates of 23.7% and 8.2%, respectively; p < 0.001), mainly driven by increased myocardial infarction (8.2% vs. 3.4%, respectively; p = 0.037) and target-vessel revascularization (18.8% vs. 5.8%, respectively; p < 0.001) between groups. Definite ST rate was 3.4% in the culotte group and 0% in the DK crush group (p = 0.007). Complex LMDBLs were associated with a higher rate of MACE (35.3%) at 3 years compared with a rate of 8.1% in patients with simple LMDBLs (p < 0.001), with an extremely higher rate in the culotte group (51.5% vs. 15.1%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Culotte stenting for LMDBLs was associated with significantly increased rates of MACE and ST. (Double Kissing [DK] Crush Versus Culotte Stenting for the Treatment of Unprotected Distal Left Main Bifurcation Lesions: DKCRUSH-III, a Multicenter Randomized Study Comparing Double-Stent Techniques; ChiCTR-TRC-11001877).

Association between statin medications and mortality, major adverse cardiovascular event, and amputation-free survival in patients with critical limb ischemia.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the associations between statin use and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and amputation-free survival in critical limb ischemia (CLI) patients. BACKGROUND: CLI is an advanced form of peripheral arterial disease associated with nonhealing arterial ulcers and high rates of MACCE and major amputation. Although statin medications are recommended for secondary prevention in peripheral arterial disease, their effectiveness in CLI is uncertain. METHODS: We reviewed 380 CLI patients who underwent diagnostic angiography or therapeutic endovascular intervention from 2006 through 2012. Propensity scores and inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to adjust for baseline differences between patients taking and not taking statins. RESULTS: Statins were prescribed for 246 (65%) patients. The mean serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) level was lower in patients prescribed statins (75 ± 28 mg/dl vs. 96 ± 40 mg/dl, p < 0.001). Patients prescribed statins had more baseline comorbidities including diabetes, coronary artery disease, and hypertension, as well as more extensive lower extremity disease (all p values <0.05). After propensity weighting, statin therapy was associated with lower 1-year rates of MACCE (stroke, myocardial infarction, or death; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28 to 0.99), mortality (HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.97), and major amputation or death (HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.98). Statin use was also associated with improved lesion patency among patients undergoing infrapopliteal angioplasty. Patients with LDL levels >130 mg/dl had increased HRs of MACCE and mortality compared with patients with lower levels of LDL. CONCLUSIONS: Statins are associated with lower rates of mortality and MACCE and increased amputation-free survival in CLI patients.

Impact of coronary anatomy and stenting technique on long-term outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the impact of anatomic and procedural variables on the outcome of the unprotected left main coronary artery (uLMCA) itself after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. BACKGROUND: There is a controversial debate regarding when and how to perform percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for an uLMCA stenosis. METHODS: This analysis is based on a randomized study of 607 patients undergoing PCI for uLMCA, randomized 1:1 to receive paclitaxel- or sirolimus-eluting stents. We evaluated the impact of the SYNTAX score, uLMCA anatomy, and stenting technique on in-stent restenosis (ISR), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and the 3-year outcomes. RESULTS: The 3-year cardiac mortality rate was 5.8%; 235 (39%) patients had a true bifurcation lesion (TBL), and the median SYNTAX score was 27. TBL was associated with a higher need for multiple stents (72% vs. 37%, p < 0.001). TBL was a significant predictor of ISR (23% vs. 14%, p = 0.008) and for TLR (18% vs. 9%, p < 0.001). The need for multiple stents was a predictor of ISR (22% vs. 13%, p = 0.005) and for TLR (16% vs. 9%, p = 0.005). Culotte stenting showed better results compared with T-stenting for ISR (21% vs. 56%, p = 0.02) and for TLR (15% vs. 56%, p < 0.001). We observed a significant association between uLMCA-TLR and SYNTAX scores (9.2% for scores ≤ 22, 14.9% for scores 23 to 32, and 13.0% for scores ≥ 33, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: PCI of uLMCA lesions with DES is safe and effective out to 3 years. TBL and multiple stents were independent predictors for ISR. In the multivariate analysis, independent predictors for TLR were TBL, age, and EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation). (Drug-Eluting-Stents for Unprotected Left Main Stem Disease [ISAR-LEFT-MAIN]; NCT00133237).

A next-generation bioresorbable coronary scaffold system: from bench to first clinical evaluation: 6- and 12-month clinical and multimodality imaging results.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to perform clinical and imaging assessments of the DESolve Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold (BCS). BACKGROUND: BCS, which is drug eluting, may have potential advantages compared with conventional metallic drug-eluting stents. The DESolve system, designed to provide vessel support and neointimal suppression, combines a poly-l-lactic acid-based scaffold with the antiproliferative myolimus. METHODS: The DESolve First-in-Man (a non-randomized, consecutive enrollment evaluation of the DESolve myolimus eluting bioresorbable coronary stent in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions) trial was a prospective multicenter study enrolling 16 patients eligible for treatment. The principal safety endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization. The principal imaging endpoint was in-scaffold late lumen loss (LLL) assessed by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) at 6 months. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging was performed at baseline and 6 months; multislice computed tomography (MSCT) was performed at 12 months. RESULTS: Acute procedural success was achieved in 15 of 15 patients receiving a study scaffold. At 12 months, there was no scaffold thrombosis and no major adverse cardiac events directly attributable to the scaffold. At 6 months, in-scaffold LLL (by QCA) was 0.19 ± 0.19 mm; neointimal volume (by IVUS) was 7.19 ± 3.56%, with no evidence of scaffold recoil or late malapposition. Findings were confirmed with OCT and showed uniform, thin neointimal coverage (0.12 ± 0.04 mm). At 12 months, MSCT demonstrated excellent vessel patency. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of the DESolve BCS. Results showing low in-scaffold LLL, low % neointimal volume at 6 months, no chronic recoil, and maintenance of lumen patency at 12 months prompt further study. (DESolve First-in-Man; EudraCT number 2011-000027-32).

Long-term prognostic impact of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with Kawasaki disease and coronary artery lesions: a 15-year follow-up study.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) over a 15-year follow-up for predicting cardiac events in adolescent Kawasaki disease (KD) patients with coronary artery lesions (CALs). BACKGROUND: Although DSE is an established technique for the detection of coronary artery disease, its prognostic value to predict cardiac events in adolescent KD patients with CALs is unknown. METHODS: Fifty-eight adolescent KD patients, including 36 patients with CALs documented by coronary angiography, and 22 patients with normal coronary arteries documented by echocardiography who underwent DSE were reviewed at initial testing (mean age: 13.6 years) and at 15 years' follow-up. Follow-up events were tabulated as major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) that included cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and revascularization. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 14.7 years, there were 16 patients with MACEs (acute myocardial infarction: n = 1; old myocardial infarction: n = 7; coronary artery bypass grafting: n = 4; percutaneous coronary intervention: n = 4). Significant coronary artery disease (CAD) (>70% coronary stenosis) was detected in 31.0% of patients at initial testing and 42.1% at follow-up. However, there were no significant differences in wall motion score indices (WMSI) at peak DSE between initial testing and follow-up (p = 0.762). Five of 6 patients (85%) with false-positive DSE results (WMSI: ≥1.25) at initial testing, who had giant aneurysms without CAD, developed CAD with MACEs during follow-up. Cumulative event-free survival rate to 15 years was 25.0% in patients with WMSI ≥1.25 and 91.7% in patients with WMSI <1.25. Cox regression analysis showed the grade of peak WMSI at initial testing to be the only independent predictor of MACEs (relative risk: 3.28; 95% confidence interval: 1.73 to 6.20). CONCLUSIONS: DSE provided independent prognostic information up to 15 years in adolescent KD survivors.

Proenkephalin and prognosis after acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this research was to assess the prognostic value of proenkephalin (PENK) levels in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) by using N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) scores as comparators and to identify levels that might be valuable in clinical decision making. BACKGROUND: PENK is a stable analyte of labile enkephalins. Few biomarkers predict recurrent AMI. METHODS: We measured PENK in 1,141 patients (820 male subjects; mean age 66.2 ± 12.8 years) with AMI. Endpoints were major adverse events (composite of death, myocardial infarction [MI], and heart failure [HF] hospitalization) and recurrent MI at 2 years. GRACE scoring was used for comparisons with PENK for the death and/or MI endpoint at 6 months. RESULTS: During follow-up, 139 patients died, and there were 112 HF hospitalizations and 149 recurrent AMIs. PENK levels were highest on admission and were related to estimated glomerular filtration rate, left ventricular wall motion index, sex, blood pressure, and age. Multivariable Cox regression models found that the PENK level was a predictor of major adverse events (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.52 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.19 to 1.94]), death and/or AMI (HR: 1.76 [95% CI: 1.34 to 2.30]), and death and/or HF (HR: 1.67 [95% CI: 1.24 to 2.25]) (all comparisons p < 0.001), as well as recurrent AMI (HR: 1.43 [95% CI: 1.07 to 1.91]; p < 0.01). PENK levels were independent predictors of 6-month death and/or MI compared with GRACE scores. PENK-adjusted GRACE scores reclassified patients significantly (overall category-free net reclassification improvement [>0] of 21.9 [95% CI: 4.5 to 39.4]; p < 0.014). PENK levels <48.3 pmol/l and >91 pmol/l detected low- and high-risk patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PENK levels reflect cardiorenal status post-AMI and are prognostic for death, recurrent AMI, or HF. Cutoff values define low- and high-risk groups and improve risk prediction of GRACE scores.

Initial success rate of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion in a native coronary artery is decreased in patients who underwent previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the initial success rate of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) in a native coronary artery (NCA) in patients with and without previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and to assess predictive factors. BACKGROUND: Landmark novel wiring techniques for CTO-PCI have contributed to improvement in the initial success of CTO-PCI. However, challenges persist in CTO-PCI in NCA in pCABG patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent CTO-PCI in an NCA were selected and classified into 2 groups: pCABG (206 PCIs in 153 patients) and nCABG (1,431 PCIs in 1,139 patients). RESULTS: CTO was located more often in the left anterior descending artery (p = 0.0003), and severe calcified lesions were observed more frequently in the pCABG group (p < 0.0001). Although the retrograde attempt was tried more frequently in the pCABG group, the CTO-PCI success rate was significantly lower in the pCABG patients than in the nCABG patients (71% vs. 83%). Longer procedural time and greater radiation exposure were needed in the pCABG patients. Logistic regression analysis among the pCABG patients revealed that intravascular ultrasound use and parallel wiring were positive factors, and lesion tortuosity was a negative factor. CONCLUSIONS: The initial success rate of CTO-PCI of an NCA in the pCABG group was significantly decreased compared with that in the nCABG group. Anatomic complexity and unstable hemodynamic state were unfavorable conditions. This study reveals that the issues to be overcome are lying with CTO revascularization in an NCA in pCABG patients.

Impact of positive and negative lesion site remodeling on clinical outcomes: insights from PROSPECT.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated coronary artery remodeling patterns associated with clinical outcomes. BACKGROUND: In the prospective, multicenter PROSPECT (Providing Regional Observations to Study Predictors of Events in the Coronary Tree: An Imaging Study in Patients With Unstable Atherosclerotic Lesions) study, reported predictors of nonculprit lesion (NCL) major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were an intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) minimal lumen area (MLA) ≤4 mm(2), a plaque burden ≥70%, and a IVUS-virtual histology (VH) thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA), but not lesion site remodeling. METHODS: Overall, 697 consecutive patients with an acute coronary syndrome were enrolled and underwent 3-vessel gray-scale and IVUS-VH; 3,223 NCLs were identified by IVUS. The remodeling index (RI) was calculated as the external elastic membrane area at the MLA site divided by the average of the proximal and distal reference external elastic membrane areas. First, one third of the patients were randomly selected to determine RI cutoffs related to NCL MACE (development cohort). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed that there were 2 separate cut points that predicted NCL MACE: RI = 0.8789 and RI = 1.0046 (area under the curve = 0.663). These cut points were used to define negative remodeling as an RI <0.88, intermediate remodeling as an RI of 0.88 to 1.00, and positive remodeling as an RI >1.00. Second, we used the remaining two-thirds of patients to validate these cut points with respect to lesion morphology and clinical outcomes (validation cohort). RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier curve analysis in the validation cohort showed that NCL MACE occurred more frequent (and equally) in negative and positive remodeling lesions compared with intermediate remodeling lesions. In this cohort, negative remodeling lesions had the smallest MLA, positive remodeling lesions had the largest plaque burden, and VH TCFA, especially VH TCFA with multiple necrotic cores, was most common in negatively remodeling lesions. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed the novel concept that positive and negative lesion site remodeling was associated with unanticipated NCL MACE in the PROSPECT study. ( PROSPECT: An Imaging Study in Patients With Unstable Atherosclerotic Lesions [PROSPECT]; NCT00180466).

Two-year outcomes after first- or second-generation drug-eluting or bare-metal stent implantation in all-comer patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a pre-specified analysis from the PRODIGY study (PROlonging Dual Antiplatelet Treatment After Grading stent-induced Intimal hyperplasia studY).

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess device-specific outcomes after implantation of bare-metal stents (BMS), zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor Sprint stents (ZES-S), paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES), or everolimus-eluting stents (EES) (Medtronic Cardiovascular, Santa Rosa, California) in all-comer patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. BACKGROUND: Few studies have directly compared second-generation drug-eluting stents with each other or with BMS. METHODS: We randomized 2,013 patients to BMS, ZES-S, PES, or EES implantation. At 30 days, each stent group received up to 6 or 24 months of clopidogrel therapy. The key efficacy endpoint was the 2-year major adverse cardiac event (MACE) including any death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization, whereas the cumulative rate of definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST) was the key safety endpoint. RESULTS: Clinical follow-up at 2 years was complete for 99.7% of patients. The MACE rate was lowest in EES (19.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.0 to 22.8), highest in BMS (32.1%; 95% CI: 28.1 to 36.3), and intermediate in PES (26.2%; 95% CI: 22.5 to 30.2) and ZES-S (27.8%; 95% CI: 24.1 to 31.9) groups (chi-square test = 18.9, p = 0.00029). The 2-year incidence of ST in the EES group (1%; 95% CI: 0.4 to 2.2) was similar to that in the ZES-S group (1.4%; 95% CI: 0.7 to 2.8), whereas it was lower compared with the PES (4.6%, 95% CI: 3.1 to 6.8) and BMS (3.6%; 95% CI: 2.4 to 5.6) groups (chi-square = 16.9; p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that cumulative MACE rate, encompassing both safety and efficacy endpoints, was lowest for EES, highest for BMS, and intermediate for PES and ZES-S groups. EES outperformed BMS also with respect to the safety endpoints with regard to definite or probable and definite, probable, or possible ST. (PROlonging Dual antiplatelet treatment after Grading stent-induced Intimal hyperplasia studY [PRODIGY]; NCT00611286).