Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair vs. isolated mitral surgery for severe mitral regurgitation: a French nationwide study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Mitral valve surgery and, more recently, mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) are the two treatments of severe mitral regurgitation in eligible patients. Clinical comparison of both therapies remains limited by the number of patients analysed. The objective of this study was to analyse the outcomes of mitral TEER vs. isolated mitral valve surgery at a nationwide level in France. METHODS: Based on the French administrative hospital discharge database, the study collected information for all consecutive patients treated for mitral regurgitation with isolated TEER or isolated mitral valve surgery between 2012 and 2022. Propensity score matching was used for the analysis of outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 57 030 patients were found in the database. After matching on baseline characteristics, 2160 patients were analysed in each arm. At 3-year follow-up, TEER was associated with significantly lower incidence of cardiovascular death (hazard ratio 0.685, 95% confidence interval 0.563-0.832; P = .0001), pacemaker implantation, and stroke. Non-cardiovascular death (hazard ratio 1.562, 95% confidence interval 1.238-1.971; P = .0002), recurrent pulmonary oedema, and cardiac arrest were more frequent after TEER. No significant differences between the two groups were observed regarding all-cause death (hazard ratio 0.967, 95% confidence interval 0.835-1.118; P = .65), endocarditis, major bleeding, atrial fibrillation, and myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that TEER for severe mitral regurgitation was associated with lower cardiovascular mortality than mitral surgery at long-term follow-up. Pacemaker implantation and stroke were less frequently observed after TEER.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of alcohol septal ablation in the era of transcatheter valve interventions.

BACKGROUND: The clinical efficacy and safety of alcohol septal ablation (ASA) for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) have been well-established; however, less is known about outcomes in patients undergoing preemptive ASA before transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR). AIMS: The goal of this study is to characterize the procedural characteristics and examine the clinical outcomes of ASA in both HCM and pre-TMVR. METHODS: This retrospective study compared procedural characteristics and outcomes in patient who underwent ASA for HCM and TMVR. RESULTS: In total, 137 patients were included, 86 in the HCM group and 51 in the TMVR group. The intraventricular septal thickness (mean 1.8 vs. 1.2 cm; p < 0.0001) and the pre-ASA LVOT gradient (73.6 vs. 33.8 mmHg; p ≤ 0.001) were higher in the HCM group vs the TMVR group. The mean volume of ethanol injected was higher (mean 2.4 vs. 1.7 cc; p < 0.0001). The average neo-left ventricular outflow tract area increased significantly after ASA in the patients undergoing TMVR (99.2 ± 83.37 mm2 vs. 196.5 ± 114.55 mm2; p = <0.0001). The HCM group had a greater reduction in the LVOT gradient after ASA vs the TMVR group (49.3 vs. 18 mmHg; p = 0.0040). The primary composite endpoint was higher in the TMVR group versus the HCM group (50.9% vs. 25.6%; p = 0.0404) and had a higher incidence of new permanent pacemaker (PPM) (25.5% vs. 18.6%; p = 0.3402). The TMVR group had a higher rate of all-cause mortality (9.8% vs. 1.2%; p = 0.0268). CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive ASA before TMVR was performed in patients with higher degree of clinical comorbidities, and correspondingly is associated with worse short-term clinical outcomes in comparison to ASA for HCM patients. ASA before TMVR enabled percutaneous mitral interventions in a small but significant minority of patients that would have otherwise been excluded. The degree of LVOT and neoLVOT area increase is significant and predictable.

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement with Mi-thos system: First-in-human experience.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) has become an alternative for high-risk patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the Mi-thos TMVR system (NewMed Medical) for high-risk patients with severe MR. METHODS: This was a prospective, two-center, single-arm early feasibility study. Baseline characteristics, procedural data and 30-day follow-up outcomes were collected and analyzed. The primary endpoint was intraoperative success rate of device implantation. The second endpoints were all-cause mortality and major post-procedural complications. Echocardiographic data were evaluated by an independent core laboratory. Clinical events were adjudicated by a clinical events committee. RESULTS: Ten high-risk patients with severe MR were enrolled at two sites from August 2021 to November 2022. The median age was 70.5 years, and 60% of patients were female. The median Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality was 9.5%. The Mi-thos TMVR system was successfully implanted via transapical access in all patients. There was no pericedural mortality or major postpericedural complications during the 30-day follow-up. All implanted prosthetic valves had no or trace valvular or paravalvular MR, and the median mitral valve gradient at 30 days was 2.0 mmHg (IQR: 2.0-3.0 mmHg). There was one mild left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: The favorable short-term outcomes of the Mi-thos TMVR system demonstrated that it might be a feasible and safe therapeutic alternative for high-risk patients with severe MR. Nevertheless, further evaluation of the Mi-thos TMVR system is warranted.

Relation of body mass index to long-term survival and cardiac remodelling for patients undergoing mitral valve replacement surgery.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Studies have demonstrated that obesity is paradoxically associated with reduced mortality following cardiac surgery. However, these studies have treated various types of cardiac surgery as a single entity. With mitral valve (MV) surgeries being the fastest-growing cardiac surgical interventions in North America, the purpose of this study was to identify the impact of body mass index (BMI) on long-term survival and cardiac remodelling of patients undergoing MV replacement (MVR). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective, single-center study, 1071 adult patients who underwent an MVR between 2004 and 2018 were stratified into five BMI groups (<20, 20-24.9, 25-29.9, 30-34.9, >35). Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to determine the association between BMI and all-cause mortality. Patients who were underweight had significantly higher all-cause mortality rates at the longest follow-up (median 8.2 years) than patients with normal weight (p = 0.01). Patients who were in the obese group had significantly higher readmission rates due to myocardial infarction (MI) at the longest follow-up (p = 0.017). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant increase in long-term all-cause mortality for female patients who were underweight. Significant changes in left atrial size, mitral valve peak and mean gradients were seen in all BMI groups. CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing mitral valve replacement, BMI is unrelated to operative outcomes except for patients who are underweight.

Standardization and validation of neoLVOT assessment using three-dimensional trans-esophageal echocardiography before trans-catheter mitral valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Trans-catheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) procedures had emerged as an alternative solution for patients who are at high risk for mitral valve surgery. Although cardiac computed tomography (CT) remains the standard method for procedural planning, there is no full agreement on the best systolic phase for quantitation of the neoLVOT. Furthermore, a new three-dimensional trans-esophageal echocardiography (3DTEE) based software was developed to serve as filter and or an alternative for patients who cannot have CT due to any contraindication. AIM: To determine the systolic phase of the cardiac cycle that shows the narrowest NeoLVOT area in order to standardize the way of using these software and then to validate the 3DTEE-based software against the CT-based one as a gold standard, in mitral valve annulus (MA) and NeoLVOT assessment. METHODS: A single center, observational, retrospective study. Initially, a sample of 20 patients (age 62 ± 4 years, 70% men) had CT-based analysis at mid-diastole (80%), early-systole (10%), mid-systole (20%), late-systole (30%-40%), in order to detect the best systolic phase at which the neoLVOT area is the narrowest after TMVR. Then, the end systolic phase was standardized for the analysis of 49 patients (age 57 ± 6 years, 60% men), using both the commercially available CT-based software and the newly available 3DTEE-based software (3mensio Structural Heart, Pie Medical Imaging, The Netherlands). The 3DTEE derived parameters were compared with the gold standard CT-based measurements. RESULTS: The neoLVOT area was significantly narrower at end-systole (224 ± 62 mm2), compared to early-systole (299 ± 70 mm2) and mid-systole (261 ± 75 mm2), (p = .005). Excellent correlation was found between 3DTEE and CT measurements for MA AP diameter (r = .96), IC diameter (r = .92), MA area (r = .96), MA perimeter (r = .94) and NeoLVOT area (r = .96), (all p-values < .0001). Virtual valve sizing was based on annulus measurement and was identical between CT and 3DTEE. Interobserver and intraobserver agreements were excellent for all the measurements with ICCs > .80. CONCLUSIONS: End-systole is the phase that shows the narrowest neoLVOT and hence should be the standard phase used during the analysis. The 3DTEE based analysis using this new software is reliable compared to the CT-based analysis and can be serve as an alternative analysis tool in patients who cannot have CT for any clinical contraindication or as a screening test and/or filter for all patients before proceeding to a detailed CT scan.

Concomitant interventions in mitral valve surgery - A European perspective.

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, major findings on concomitant procedures and anticoagulation management have occurred in Mitral Valve (MV) surgery. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the current practices in MV interventions across Europe. METHODS: In October 2021, all national cardio-thoracic societies in the European region were identified following an electronic search and sent an online survey of 14 questions to distribute among their member consultant/attending cardiac surgeons. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 91 consultant/attending cardiac surgeons across 12 European countries, with 78% indicating MV repair as their specialty area. 57.1% performed >150 operations/year and 71.4% had 10+ years of experience.Concomitant tricuspid valve repair is performed for moderate tricuspid regurgitation (TR) by 69% of surgeons and for mild TR by 26.3%, both with annular diameter >40 mm. 50.6% indicated ischaemic MV surgery in patients undergoing CABG if moderate mitral regurgitation with ERO >20 mm2 and regurgitant volume >30 mL, and 45.1% perform it if severe MR with ERO >40 mm2 and regurgitant volume >60 mL. For these patients the preferred management was: MVR if predictors of repair failure identified (47.2%) and downsizing annuloplasty ring only (34.1%).For atrial fibrillation (AF) in cardiac surgery, 34.1% perform ablation with biatrial lesion and 20% with left sided only. 62.6% perform concomitant Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) Occlusion irrespective of AF ablation with a left atrial clip. A wide variability in anticoagulation strategies for MV repair and bioprosthetic MV valve was reported both for patients in sinus rhythm and AF. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate a variable practice for MV surgery, and a degree of lack of compliance with surgical intervention guidelines and anticoagulation strategy.

Midterm Outcome of Valve Repair for Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis: 6-year Experience in a Single Mid-Volume Cardiac Center.

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have reported satisfactory long-term results of mitral valve (MV) repair for rheumatic mitral disease. However, the effects of this procedure in isolated rheumatic mitral stenosis remain unclear. In addition, protective effects of MV repair on cardiac function have not been verified in rheumatic MV disease. This study retrospectively evaluated early mortality and mid-term results of MV repair for isolated rheumatic mitral stenosis in a mid-volume cardiac centre, and explored the effects of this procedure on cardiac function. METHODS: Between January 2015 and May 2021, 360 patients with isolated rheumatic mitral stenosis and combined (concomitant) atrial fibrillation (AF) underwent MV repair (100 patients) or MV replacement (260 patients). Perioperative characteristics were compared between the two groups and a regression analysis for early mortality and mid-term left ventricular ejection fraction was conducted. In addition, mid-term survival was compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of the two groups were balanced after matching. Compared with patients in the replacement group, patients with MV repair had a lower occurrence of postoperative hypotension and AF. There was no difference in early mortality or mid-term survival between the two groups. However, MV repair was associated with a higher mid-term left ventricular ejection fraction. During follow-up, four thromboembolic events and four haemorrhagic events occurred in the replacement group. No blood coagulation-related complications occurred in the repair group. CONCLUSION: Mitral valve repair for isolated rheumatic mitral stenosis and concomitant AF was feasible in a mid-volume cardiac centre, with satisfactory perioperative results and mid-term outcomes. Furthermore, this procedure preserved mid-term left ventricular systolic function.

A Modified Tip-to-Base LAMPOON to Prevent Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction in Valve-in-Ring or Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement.

Background: The Laceration of the Anterior Mitral leaflet to Prevent Outflow ObtructioN (LAMPOON) procedure may be performed from the leaflet tip to base to prevent left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) in patients with high-risk anatomy undergoing valve-in-valve (VIV) or valve-in-(complete)-ring (VIR) transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR). Methods and Results: Thirteen consecutive patients (6 females, average age 67.7 years) with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 60%, a median STS score of 3.2%, and degenerative surgical mitral bioprosthesis or ring were treated with a combined, single-stage procedure of preventive LAMPOON and trans-septal TMVR with SAPIEN 3 valves (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA). Under real-time 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (RT 3D-TEE) guidance, we included the rendezvous technique in the LAMPOON procedure, and all 13 patients were successfully treated by tip-to-base LAMPOON and TMVR. The use of a modified LAMPOON procedure, aided by a rendezvous technique and guided by RT 3D-TEE imaging, offers precise guidance for positioning and aligning the guidewire. This approach not only reduces the need for fluoroscopy and shortens procedure times, but also significantly increases the likelihood of a successful outcome. Importantly, none of the patients in our study experienced unintentional aortic or aortic valve injuries, nor did they develop significant LVOTO following TMVR. In 11 of the 13 (85%) patients, we used a transcatheter SENTINELTM cerebral protection device (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) for stroke prevention and capture of debris ≥ 2 mm were detected in 8/11 (73%) of the cases. Conclusions: Utilizing intra-operative RT 3D-TEE in conjunction with the rendezvous technique can make the tip-to-base LAMPOON procedure even safer and more effective for patients undergoing VIV or VIR TMVR. Our study also suggests that cerebral protection is indicated in patients undergoing TMVR.

Treatment of Moderate Functional Mitral Regurgitation during Aortic Valve Replacement: A Cohort Study.

Background: Treatment of moderate functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) during aortic valve replacement (AVR) is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different surgical strategies in patients with moderate FMR undergoing AVR. Methods: A total of 468 patients with moderate FMR undergoing AVR from January 2010 to December 2019 were retrospectively studied comparing 3 different surgical strategies, namely isolated AVR, AVR + mitral valve repair (MVr) and AVR + mitral valve replacement (MVR). Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test, followed by inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis to adjust the between-group imbalances. The primary outcome was overall mortality. Results: Patients underwent isolated AVR (35.3%), AVR + MVr (30.3%), or AVR + MVR (34.4%). The median follow-up was 27.1 months. AVR + MVR was associated with better improvement of FMR during the early and follow-up period compared to isolated AVR and AVR + MVr (p < 0.001). Compared to isolated AVR, AVR + MVR increased the risk of mid-term mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-4.48, p = 0.046), which was sustained in the IPTW analysis (HR: 4.15, 95% CI: 1.69-10.15, p = 0.002). In contrast, AVR + MVr showed only a tendency to increase the risk of follow-up mortality (HR: 1.63, 95% CI: 0.72-3.67, p = 0.239), which was more apparent in the IPTW analysis (HR: 2.54, 95% CI: 0.98-6.56, p = 0.054). Conclusions: In patients with severe aortic valve disease and moderate FMR, isolated AVR might be more reasonable than AVR + MVr or AVR + MVR.

Impact of sex on in-hospital mortality and 90-day readmissions in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR): Analysis from the nationwide readmission database.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate sex differences in in-hospital mortality and 90-day readmission rates among patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) in the United States of America. BACKGROUND: Women have higher rates of mortality and rehospitalization than men following many cardiac procedures. TMVR has grown as an alternative to mitral valve surgery for patients at high surgical risk. The rates of TMVR mortality and rehospitalization by sex are unknown. METHODS: We analyzed the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) from 2016 to 2019 to identify hospitalizations for TMVR. Sex differences in in-hospital mortality and 90-day readmissions were determined using logistic regression models. RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2019, 4109 hospitalizations for TMVR were identified, comprised of 1758 (42.8%) men and 2351 (57.2%) women. The median age was 74 years for both men and women. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality during index hospitalization (6.51% vs. 6.69%; p = 0.852) and all-cause 90-day readmission (28.19% vs. 29.59%; p = 0.563) between men and women. Across the study period, trend analysis did not reveal a significant change in in-hospital mortality (men p = 0.087, women p = 0.194) or 90-day readmission rates (men p = 0.569, women p = 0.454). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing TMVR, in-hospital mortality and 90-day readmissions are similar between men and women. Between 2016 and 2019, TMVR in-hospital mortality and 90-day readmission rates remained unchanged. Further research is necessary to confirm these findings.

Preemptive alcohol septal ablation prior to transcatheter mitral valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Alcohol septal ablation (ASA) has been shown to increase the neo-left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) area before transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) but there is little literature on its success and use with dedicated devices. AIMS: To describe our experience with preemptive ASA to increase the predicted neo-LVOT area and its utility with both dedicated TMVR devices and balloon-expandable valves. METHODS: All patients who underwent ASA for TMVR candidacy in our center between May 2018 and October 2022 and had computed tomography (CT) scans done before and after ASA were included. Each CT was assessed for the minimum predicted neo-LVOT area at end-systole, using a virtual valve of the desired TMVR device for each patient. The primary outcome was an increase in the predicted neo-LVOT area after ASA that was deemed sufficient for safe implantation of the desired TMVR device. The secondary outcome was the absence of acute LVOT obstruction after TMVR. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients underwent ASA and all but 1 (n = 11, 91.6%) achieved the primary outcome of having sufficient predicted neo-LVOT area to proceed with TMVR. The mean increase in neo-LVOT area after ASA was 126 ± 64 mm2 (median 119.5, interquartile range: 65.0-163.5 mm2 ). Two patients (16.7%) required a permanent pacemaker after ASA. Nine patients went on and underwent TMVR with their respective devices and none had LVOT obstruction after the procedure. Among the remaining three patients, one had insufficient neo-LVOT clearance after ASA, one had unrelated mortality before TMVR, and one had advanced heart failure before TMVR. CONCLUSION: In appropriately selected patients and at centers experienced with ASA, preemptive ASA can achieve sufficient neo-LVOT clearance for TMVR with a variety of devices in approximately 90% of patients.

Percutaneous treatment of left circumflex coronary artery injury related to mitral valve surgery: Case series and systematic review of the literature.

Left circumflex coronary artery (LCx) injury related to mitral valve surgery is a rare complication. The best treatment option is not defined, and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may represent an effective treatment to avoid prolonged myocardial ischemia. To evaluate feasibility and efficacy of PCI treatment, all records of LCx injury related to mitral valve surgery and treated with PCI were included after a systematic PubMed searching. Moreover, we retrospectively analyzed our single-center PCI database and patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included. Patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve intervention, non-mitral valve surgery, conservatively or surgically treated after LCx injury were excluded. Data about patient characteristics, procedural details, PCI success, and in-hospital mortality were collected. Fifty-six patients were included, 58.9% were male (n = 33) and the median age was 60.5 years (IQR = 21.75). The majority had left dominant or codominant coronary system (62.2%, n = 28 and 15.6%, n = 7, respectively). Clinical manifestations ranged from hemodynamic stability (21.1%, n = 8) to hemodynamic instability (42.1%, n = 16) and cardiac arrest (18.4%, n = 7). On ECG, 23.5% of patients (n = 12) presented ST-segment depression, 58.8% (n = 30) ST-segment elevation, 7.8% (n = 4) atrioventricular block, and 29.4% (n = 15) ventricular arrhythmias. Left ventricle dysfunction was present in 52.3% (n = 22) of patients and wall motion abnormalities in 71.4% (n = 30). PCI success rate was 82.1% (n = 46) and in-hospital mortality 4.5% (n = 2). LCx injury related to mitral surgery is a rare complication characterized by an increased risk of mortality. PCI seems a feasible treatment option, still burdened by suboptimal results, probably related to the technical challenges posed by the surgical failure.

Cardiac reverse remodeling in primary mitral regurgitation: mitral valve replacement vs. mitral valve repair.

BACKGROUND: When feasible, guidelines recommend mitral valve repair (MVr) over mitral valve replacement (MVR) to treat primary mitral regurgitation (MR), based upon historic outcome studies and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) reverse remodeling studies. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) offers reference standard biventricular assessment with superior MR quantification compared to TTE. Using serial CMR in primary MR patients, we aimed to investigate cardiac reverse remodeling and residual MR post-MVr vs MVR with chordal preservation. METHODS: 83 patients with ≥ moderate-severe MR on TTE were prospectively recruited. 6-min walk tests (6MWT) and CMR imaging including cine imaging, aortic/pulmonary through-plane phase contrast imaging, T1 maps and late-gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) imaging were performed at baseline and 6 months after mitral surgery or watchful waiting (control group). RESULTS: 72 patients completed follow-up (Controls = 20, MVr = 30 and MVR = 22). Surgical groups demonstrated comparable baseline cardiac indices and co-morbidities. At 6-months, MVr and MVR groups demonstrated comparable improvements in 6MWT distances (+ 57 ± 54 m vs + 64 ± 76 m respectively, p = 1), reduced indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volumes (LVEDVi; - 29 ± 21 ml/m2 vs - 37 ± 22 ml/m2 respectively, p = 0.584) and left atrial volumes (- 23 ± 30 ml/m2 and - 39 ± 26 ml/m2 respectively, p = 0.545). At 6-months, compared with controls, right ventricular ejection fraction was poorer post-MVr (47 ± 6.1% vs 53 ± 8.0% respectively, p = 0.01) compared to post-MVR (50 ± 5.7% vs 53 ± 8.0% respectively, p = 0.698). MVR resulted in lower residual MR-regurgitant fraction (RF) than MVr (12 ± 8.0% vs 21 ± 11% respectively, p = 0.022). Baseline and follow-up indices of diffuse and focal myocardial fibrosis (Native T1 relaxation times, extra-cellular volume and quantified LGE respectively) were comparable between groups. Stepwise multiple linear regression of indexed variables in the surgical groups demonstrated baseline indexed mitral regurgitant volume as the sole multivariate predictor of left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic reverse remodelling, baseline LVEDVi as the most significant independent multivariate predictor of follow-up LVEDVi, baseline indexed LV end-systolic volume as the sole multivariate predictor of follow-up LV ejection fraction and undergoing MVR (vs MVr) as the most significant (p < 0.001) baseline multivariate predictor of lower residual MR. CONCLUSION: In primary MR, MVR with chordal preservation may offer comparable cardiac reverse remodeling and functional benefits at 6-months when compared to MVr. Larger, multicenter CMR studies are required, which if the findings are confirmed could impact future surgical practice.

Infant Mitral Valve Replacement: Current State of the Art.

Mitral valve replacement (MVR) in the very young is an imposing clinical challenge. Early and late mortality risk is substantial, severe adverse events are common, and redo mitral valve replacement is inevitable. Therapeutic options are limited. In the older infant with an annulus of 17mm or larger, mechanical MVR is associated with low risk of mortality and predictable durability. For the very young with annular hypoplasia, bovine jugular vein conduit MVR appears to offer equivalent or better early outcomes with the possibility of subsequent valve expansion, potentially prolonging the interval to redo MVR. Experience with cylinder MVR and other forms of surgeon-manufactured MVR is quite limited, and there is currently no information on late outcomes or durability.

The Long-Term Impact of Diastolic Dysfunction After Routine Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of diastolic dysfunction (DD) on survival after routine cardiac surgery. DESIGN: This was an observational study of consecutive cardiac surgeries from 2010 to 2021. SETTING: At a single institution. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing isolated coronary, isolated valvular, and concomitant coronary and valvular surgery were included. Patients with a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) longer than 6 months prior to their index surgery were excluded from the analysis. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were categorized via preoperative TTE as having no DD, grade I DD, grade II DD, or grade III DD. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 8,682 patients undergoing a coronary and/or valvular surgery were identified, of whom 4,375 (50.4%) had no DD, 3,034 (34.9%) had grade I DD, 1,066 (12.3%) had grade II DD, and 207 (2.4%) had grade III DD. The median (IQR) time of the TTE prior to the index surgery was 6 (2-29) days. Operative mortality was 5.8% in the grade III DD group v 2.4% for grade II DD, 1.9% for grade I DD, and 2.1% for no DD (p = 0.001). Atrial fibrillation, prolonged mechanical ventilation (>24 hours), acute kidney injury, any packed red blood cell transfusion, reexploration for bleeding, and length of stay were higher in the grade III DD group compared to the rest of the cohort. The median follow-up was 4.0 (IQR: 1.7-6.5) years. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were lower in the grade III DD group than in the rest of the cohort. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggested that DD may be associated with poor short-term and long-term outcomes.

Early re-replacement after mitral valve replacement using the chimney technique in a child: a case report.

Mitral valve replacement for small pediatric patients is technically difficult because of the small annulus and requires some technical ideas. The chimney technique is useful for supra-annular mitral valve replacement. We describe a paediatric case of early re-replacement owing to pannus formation after mitral valve replacement using the chimney technique.

Secondary Mitral Regurgitation and Heart Failure: Current Advances in Diagnosis and Management.

The causes of mitral regurgitation (MR) can be broadly divided into primary and secondary causes. Although primary MR is caused by degenerative alterations of the mitral valve and the mitral valve apparatus, secondary (functional) MR is multifactorial and related to dilation of the left ventricle and/or mitral annulus commonly resulting in concomitant restriction of the leaflets. Therefore, the treatment of secondary MR (SMR) is complex and includes guideline directed heart failure therapy along with surgical and transcatheter approaches that have shown effectiveness in certain subgroups. This review aims to provide insight into current advances in diagnosis and management of SMR.

[Mitral valve replacement in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy]. / Protezirovanie mitral'nogo klapana u bol'nykh obstruktivnoi gipertroficheskoi kardiomiopatiei.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the incidence and causes of mitral valve replacement in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). MATERIAL AND METHODS: There were 172 patients (98 women and 74 men) with obstructive HCM and severe mitral valve insufficiency between November 2017 and May 2023. All patients complained of chronic heart failure NYHA class III. Surgical correction of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction and mitral valve repair with elimination of systolic anterior motion were technically successful in 160 (93.0%) patients. RESULTS: The need for mitral valve replacement was noted in 12 (7.0%) patients. Mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 83.5±19.2 min (94; 127), aortic cross-clamping - 62.8±14.3 min (70; 102). In 5 cases, primary mitral valve replacement was scheduled due to obvious organic lesion of the mitral valve (tearing of chords, rheumatic lesion with leaflet restriction). In 7 patients, valve replacement was forced after ineffective primary septal myectomy (LVOT pressure gradient, severe mitral insufficiency). CONCLUSION: Mitral valve replacement is an involuntary strategy after ineffective myectomy with severe mitral insufficiency and high LVOT pressure gradient.

Current Indications for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Using Transcatheter Aortic Valves: Valve-in-Valve, Valve-in-Ring, and Valve-in-Mitral Annulus Calcification.

Use of transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) using transcatheter aortic valves in clinical practice is limited to patients with failing bioprostheses and rings or mitral valve disease associated with severe mitral annulus calcification. Whereas the use of valve-in-valve TMVR appears to be a reasonable alternative to surgery in patients at high surgical risk, much less evidence supports valve-in-ring and valve-in-mitral annulus calcification interventions. Data on the results of TMVR in these settings are derived from small case series or voluntary registries. This review summarizes the current evidence on TMVR using transcatheter aortic valves in clinical practice from the characteristics of the TMVR candidates, screening process, performance of the procedure, and description of current results and future perspectives. TMVR using dedicated devices in native noncalcified mitral valve diseases is beyond the scope of the article.

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: Rationale and Current Status.

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most prevalent form of moderate or severe valve disease in the developed world. MR can result from impairment of any part of the mitral valve apparatus and is classified as primary (disease of the leaflets) or secondary (functional). The presence of at least moderate MR is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. With the goal of avoiding the risks of traditional surgery, transcatheter mitral valve therapies have been developed. The current transcatheter repair techniques are limited by therapeutic target and incomplete MR reduction, and thus transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) has been pursued. Several devices (both transapical and transseptal) are under development, with both early feasibility and pivotal trials under way. As this field develops, the decision to treat with TMVR will require a heart team approach that takes patient-, disease-, and device-specific factors into account.