The epidemiology of odontoid fractures: a study from the Swedish fracture register.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to characterize the occurrence of odontoid fractures within a Swedish population. METHODS: Prospective data of adults diagnosed with an odontoid fracture between 2015 and 2021 were retrieved from the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR). Epidemiologic data including age, sex, injury mechanism, injury type, fracture type (Anderson and D'Alonzo classification), neurological status and treatment type were requested from the SFR. Data pertinent to osteoporosis was retrieved from the Swedish National Patient Register. RESULTS: A total of 1,154 odontoid fractures were identified, of which 30 were type I fractures, 583 type II fractures, and 541 type III fractures. The mean (Standard Deviation [SD]) age was 77.2 (13.8) years. The prevalence of osteoporosis and neurological deficits did not differ between the fracture types. The majority of patients were treated non-surgically (81%). Male sex and patient age 18-30 years were commonly associated with a high-injury mechanism, especially motor vehicle accidents. In the type II fracture group, significantly more patients had fallen from standing height or less than in the type III group (66% vs. 58%, p = 0.01) while in contrast, motor vehicle accidents were more common in the type III fracture group (12% vs. type II: 8%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Based on the SFR, the typical odontoid fracture patient is older and suffers a type II fracture. Most injuries were caused by low-energy trauma although in younger patients and males, they were associated with motor vehicle accidents. Across the patient population, odontoid fractures were usually treated non-surgically.

Analysis of Three-Dimensional Bone Microarchitecture of the Axis Exposes Pronounced Regional Heterogeneity Associated with Clinical Fracture Patterns.

The odontoid process (dens) of the second cervical vertebra (axis) is prone to fracture. While the importance of its skeletal integrity has been previously noted, representative three-dimensional microarchitecture analyses in humans are not available. This study aimed to determine the bone microarchitecture of the axis using high-resolution quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) and to derive clinical implications for the occurrence and treatment of axis fractures. For initial clinical reference, the apparent density of the axis was determined based on clinical computed tomography (CT) images in patients without and with fractures of the axis. Subsequently, 28 human axes (female 50%) obtained at autopsy were analyzed by HR-pQCT. Analyses were performed in three different regions corresponding to zones I (tip of dens), II (base of dens), and III (corpus axis) of the Anderson and D'Alonzo classification. Lower apparent densities based on clinical CT data were detected in zone II and III compared to zone I in both the group without and with fracture. In the autopsy specimens, cortical thickness and bone volume fraction decreased continuously from zone I to zone III. Trabecular and cortical tissue mineral density was lowest in zone III, with no differences between zones I and II. In conclusion, our clinical and high-resolution ex vivo imaging data highlight a marked regional heterogeneity of bone microarchitecture, with poor cortical and trabecular properties near the dens base. These results may partly explain why zones II and III are at high risk of fracture and osteosynthesis failure.

Odontoid fracture in geriatric patients - analysis of complications and outcome following conservative treatment vs. ventral and dorsal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Different treatment options are discussed for geriatric odontoid fracture. The aim of this study was to compare the treatment options for geriatric odontoid fractures. METHODS: Included were patients with the following criteria: age ≥ 65 years, identification of seniors at risk (ISAR score ≥ 2), and odontoid fracture type A/B according to Eysel and Roosen. Three groups were compared: conservative treatment, surgical therapy with ventral screw osteosynthesis or dorsal instrumentation. At a follow-up examination, the range of motion and the trabecular bone fracture healing rate were evaluated. Furthermore, demographic patient data, neurological status, length of stay at the hospital and at the intensive care unit (ICU) as well as the duration of surgery and occurring complications were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were included and 43 patients could be re-examined (range: 2.7 ± 2.1 months). Patients with dorsal instrumentation had a better rotation. Other directions of motion were not significantly different. The trabecular bone fracture healing rate was 78.6%. The patients with dorsal instrumentation were hospitalized significantly longer; however, their duration at the ICU was shortest. There was no significant difference in complications. CONCLUSION: Geriatric patients with odontoid fracture require individual treatment planning. Dorsal instrumentation may offer some advantages.

Minimally invasive modification of the Goel-Harms atlantoaxial fusion technique: a case series and illustrative guide.

OBJECTIVE: The Goel-Harms atlantoaxial screw fixation technique for the treatment of atlantoaxial instability and unstable odontoid fractures is reliable and reproducible for a variety of anatomies. The drawbacks of the technique are the potential for significant bleeding from the C2 nerve root venous plexus and the risks associated with posterior midline exposure and retraction, such as pain and wound complications. The authors developed a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) modification of the Goel-Harms technique using intra-articular grafting to facilitate placement of percutaneous lateral mass and pars screws with extended tabs for minimally invasive subfascial rod placement. The objective of this study was to present the authors' first series of 5 patients undergoing minimally invasive modification in comparison with 51 patients undergoing open atlantoaxial fusion. METHODS: A retrospectiveanalysis of patient comorbid conditions, blood loss, length of surgery, and length of stay was performed on patients undergoing Goel-Harms instrumented fusion (GHIF) for unstable odontoid fractures performed between 2016 and 2021. RESULTS: Patients undergoing the minimally invasive procedure showed significantly less blood loss than those undergoing the open atlantoaxial fusion procedure, with a median blood loss of 30 ml compared with 150 ml using the open technique (p < 0.01). The patients showed no significant differences in length of stay (2 days for MIS vs 4 days for open atlantoaxial fusion, p = 0.25). There were no significant differences in length of surgery for MIS, but a possible trend toward increased operative duration (234 vs 151 minutes, p = 0.112). CONCLUSIONS: In this small pilot study, it was shown that MIS-GHIF can be performed with decreased blood loss in atlantoaxial instability and odontoid fractures. This technique may allow for greater and safer application of the procedure in the elderly and infirm.

Worsening ambulation in elderly patients with cervical odontoid fractures: A nationwide multicenter study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing prevalence of cervical odontoid fractures in older adults, the treatment strategy is controversial. The objectives of the current study are to investigate the prognosis and complications of cervical odontoid fractures in elderly patients and to identify factors associated with worsening of ambulation after 6 months. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective study included 167 patients aged 65 years or older with odontoid fractures. Patient demographic and treatment data were investigated and compared according to the treatment strategy. To determine associations with worsening ambulation after 6 months, we focused on the treatment strategies (nonsurgical treatment [collar immobilization or halo vest], conversion to surgery, or initial surgery) and patients' background. RESULTS: Patients who received nonsurgical treatment were significantly older, and patients who underwent surgery had more Anderson-D'Alonzo type 2 fractures. Of the patients initially treated nonsurgically, 26% later underwent surgery. Numbers of complications, including death, and degrees of ambulation after 6 months did not differ significantly among treatment strategies. Patients who had worsened ambulation after 6 months were significantly more likely to be older than 80 years, to have needed assistance with walking before injury, and to have cerebrovascular disease. Multivariable analysis showed that a score of ≥2 on the 5-item modified frailty index (mFI-5) was significantly associated with worsening ambulation. CONCLUSIONS: Preinjury mFI-5 scores of ≥2 were significantly associated with worsening ambulation 6 months after treatment of cervical odontoid fractures in older adults.

Improving stability of atlantoaxial fusion: a biomechanical study.

PURPOSE: The incidence of atlanto-axial injuries is continuously increasing and often requires surgical treatment. Recently, Harati developed a new procedure combining polyaxial transarticular screws with polyaxial atlas massae lateralis screws via a rod system with promising clinical results, yet biomechanical data is lacking. This biomechanical study consequently aims to evaluate the properties of the Harati technique. METHODS: Two groups, each consisting of 7 cervical vertebral segments (C1/2), were formed and provided with a dens axis type 2 fracture according to Alonzo. One group was treated with the Harms and the other with the Harati technique. The specimen was loaded via a lever arm to simulate extension, flexion, lateral flexion and rotation. For statistical analysis, dislocation (°) was measured and compared. RESULTS: For extension and flexion, the Harati technique displayed a mean dislocation of 4.12° ± 2.36° and the Harms technique of 8.48° ± 1.49° (p < 0.01). For lateral flexion, the dislocation was 0.57° ± 0.30° for the Harati and 1.19° ± 0.25° for the Harms group (p < 0.01). The mean dislocation for rotation was 1.09° ± 0.48° for the Harati and 2.10° ± 0.31° for the Harms group (p < 0.01). No implant failure occurred. CONCLUSION: This study found a significant increase in biomechanical stability of the Harati technique when compared to the technique by Harms et al. Consequently, this novel technique can be regarded as a promising alternative for the treatment of atlanto-axial instabilities.

Odontoid Type II fractures in elderly: what are the real management goals and how to best achieve them? A multicenter European study on functional outcome.

Odontoid fractures constitute the most common cervical fractures in elderly. External immobilization is the treatment of choice for Type I and III; there is still no wide consensus about the best management of Type II fractures. Observational multicenter study was conducted on a prospectively built database on elderly patients (> 75 years) with Type II odontoid fracture managed conservatively during the last 10 years. All patients underwent CT scan on admission and at 3 months; if indicated, selected patient had CT scan at 6 and 12 months. All patients were clinically evaluated by Neck Disability Index (NDI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and American Society of Anaesthesiologists classification (ASA) on admission; NDI was assessed also at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months; furthermore, a quality of life (QoL) assessment with the SF-12 form was performed at 3 and 12 months. Among the 260 patients enrolled, 177 (68%) were women and 83 (32%) men, with a median age of 83 years. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 24 months: 247 (95%) showed an excellent functional outcome within 6 weeks, among them 117 (45%) showed a good bony healing, whereas 130 (50%) healed in pseudo-arthrosis. The residual 5% were still variably symptomatic at 12 weeks; however, only 5 out of 13 (2% of the total cohort) required delayed surgery. This study showed that a conservative approach to odontoid Type II fracture in elderly is an effective and valid option, resulting in an excellent functional outcome (regardless of bony fusion) in the majority of cases. Failure of conservative treatment can be safely addressed with surgical fixation at a later stage.

Short-term posterior C1-C2 pedicle screw fixation without fusion to treat type II odontoid fracture among people under 60 years.

INTRODUCTION: Posterior C1-C2 pedicle screw fixation is a reliable technique used in treatment of type II odontoid fracture. However, the loss of cervical range of rotation motion (RORM) was inevitable. There were few studies focusing on the influence of short-term C1-C2 fixation with nonfusion technique to preserve cervical function in patients younger than 60 years. The purpose of this study was to compare cervical RORM which was measured by an improved goniometer, and the clinical outcomes between short-term and long-term C1-C2 fixation techniques in the treatment of Grauer type 2B and 2C odontoid fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study represents a retrospective analysis, including patients who underwent primary C1-C2 fixation surgery. These patients were divided into short-term and long-term groups based on whether underwent a fixation removal operation. The clinical results were collected and compared between the two groups. Independent T test and Chi-square analyses were used to identify significant differences between the two groups and dependent T test was used within each group. Statistical significance was set at p < .05. RESULTS: There were no severe postoperative complications, and all 60 patients achieved spinal stabilization after primary surgery. The mean rotation angle in the short-term group at last follow-up time was 138.39 ± 21.06°, which was better than 83.59 ± 13.06° in the long-term group (p < .05). The same statistical difference was observed in flexion-extension angle, which was 71.11 ± 18.73° in short-term group and 53.34 ± 18.23° in long-term group. The mean NDI score in short-term group at last follow-up time was 1.23 ± 0.86 and better than 8.24 ± 3.17 in long-term group. However, the VAS score in short-term group was 1.82 ± 0.54 which was worse compared to 0.64 ± 0.29 in long-term group. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated that primary C1-C2 fixation with nonfusion technique could support satisfactory clinical effects. In addition, the removal of instruments after bony fusion could improve the function of cervical movement significantly in patients under 60 years.

A biomechanical comparison of a cement-augmented odontoid screw with a posterior-instrumented fusion in geriatric patients with an odontoid fracture type IIb.

PURPOSE: Possible surgical therapies for odontoid fracture type IIb include odontoid screw osteosynthesis (OG) with preservation of mobility or dorsal C1/2 fusion with restriction of cervical rotation. In order to reduce material loosening in odontoid screw osteosynthesis in patients with low bone density, augmentation at the base of the axis using bone cement has been established as a suitable alternative. In this study, we compared cement-augmented OG and C1/2 fusion according to Harms (HG). METHODS: Body donor preparations of the 1st and 2nd cervical vertebrae were randomized in 2 groups (OG vs. HG). The range of motion (ROM) was determined in 3 principle motion plains. Subsequently, a cyclic loading test was performed. The decrease in height of the specimen and the double amplitude height were determined as absolute values as an indication of screw loosening. Afterward, the ROM was determined again and loosening of the screws was measured in a computed tomography. RESULTS: A total of 16 were included. Two groups of 8 specimens (OG vs. HG) from patients with a median age of 80 (interquartile range (IQ) 73.5-85) years and a reduced bone density of 87.2 (IQ 71.2-104.5) mg/cc dipotassium hydrogen phosphate were examined for their biomechanical properties. Before and after exposure, the OG preparations were significantly more mobile. At the time of loading, the OG had similar loading properties to HG decrease in height of the specimen and the double amplitude height. Computed tomography revealed similar outcomes with regard to the screw loosening rate (62.5 vs. 87.5%, p = 0.586). CONCLUSION: In patients with an odontoid fracture type IIb and reduced bone density, cement-augmented odontoid screw yielded similar properties in the loading tests compared to the HG. It may, therefore, be considered as a primary alternative to preserve cervical mobility in these patients.

The impact of odontoid screw fixation techniques on screw-related complications and fusion rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The primary goal of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles focused on odontoid screw fixation (OSF) and screw-related complications or non-union rates. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the PubMed and Crossref databases between January 1982 and December 2019. Inclusion criteria comprised detailed descriptions of the surgical technique and screw-related complications (screw cut-out, loosening, breakage, malposition) or fusion rates. RESULTS: The initial selection consisted of 683 abstracts. A total of 150 full texts were chosen for detailed study, and 83 articles were included in the analysis. The point estimates for screw-related complications were as follows: 1. screw malposition frequency-4.8%; 2. screw cut-out rate-5.0%; 3. screw loosening/pull-out-3.8%; and 4. screw fracture rate-3.1%. The point estimate for the non-union rate was 9.7%. Statistical analysis of the screw-related complications rate based on surgical technique details was also performed CONCLUSIONS: Double-screw OSF performance in elder patients resulted in a higher risk of post-operative screw cut-out. In other cases, the development of screw-related complications did not depend on the method of intraoperative head fixation, selection of the implant entry point for OSF, type of the used screws, or cannulated instruments application. The outcomes of single-screw fixation through the anterior lip of the C2 vertebra were comparable to other techniques of OSF. Further, statistically reliable studies should be carried out to identify the optimal technique of OSF.

Clinical features and early post-operative complications of isolated C2 odontoid fractures: a retrospective analysis using a national inpatient database in Japan.

PURPOSE: To examine the clinical features and post-treatment complications in patients with isolated C2 odontoid fractures. METHODS: We extracted data for all patients who were admitted with C2 odontoid fractures from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database between July 2010 and March 2017. We then compared the post-treatment complications during hospitalization according to treatment types: conservative treatment (with or without use of halo-vest) and surgery (anterior or posterior spinal fixation). RESULTS: A total of 3167 patients (1533 men, 1634 women; mean age, 70 years) with isolated C2 odontoid fractures were identified, including 1124 patients (35%) aged ≥ 80 years. Among the total patients, 2476 (78%) received conservative treatment (with halo-vest, 728; without halo-vest, 1748). The remaining 691 patients (22%) underwent surgery (anterior surgery, 129; posterior surgery, 556; combined surgery, 6). There were no differences between the conservative treatment and surgery groups in baseline characteristics and preexisting comorbid conditions except for age (71 vs. 69 years, p = 0.042). In-hospital death occurred in 136 patients (4.3%). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the two groups (overall, conservative treatment 4.6% vs. surgery 3.0%, p = 0.066; age ≥ 80 years, conservative treatment 7.2% vs. surgery 5.4%, p = 0.34). Use of halo-vest was not associated with increased mortality (with halo-vest 3.7% vs. without halo-vest 5.0%, p = 0.15). CONCLUSION: The great majority of isolated odontoid fractures occurred in elderly patients. Conservative treatment and surgery had similarly low in-hospital mortality. Use of halo-vest was not associated with an increase in mortality.

Does fracture-extension into the pars interarticularis alter outcomes in odontoid failure? a technical note on pars interarticularis osteotomy and atlantoaxial distraction arthrodesis.

PURPOSE: Odontoid process fractures can extend rostral into the C2 arch. We investigated the clinical impact of a concurrent fracture of the pars interarticularis on odontoid failure. To overcome the surgical challenges related to the morphology of these fractures, we describe a novel surgical strategy using atlantoaxial joint distraction arthrodesis. METHODS: We conducted a single centre cohort study of 13 consecutive patients with odontoid fractures extending into the pars treated between June 2016 and June 2018. Criteria for a stable fibrous non-union were: Atlanto-Dens Interval (ADI) < 3 mm, Posterior Atlanto-Dens Interval (PADI) > 14 mm and lack of symptomatic motion at the fracture site. Atlantoaxial instability was defined as greater than 50% subluxation across the C1-C2 joint. Return to pre-injury performance status was considered a satisfactory clinical outcome. RESULTS: The mean age of the patient population was 77.2 years (SD 11.9). The mean follow-up time was 15 months (SD 5.2). 69% had an associated atlantoaxial instability (P-value 0.0005). Cervical orthosis treatment was associated with a high non-union rate (70%) (P-value 0.04) although it did not affect the overall clinical outcome. 2 cases presented with cord compression were treated surgically with pars interarticularis osteotomy and atlantoaxial distraction arthrodesis. CONCLUSIONS: Odontoid fracture with extension into the pars interarticularis often present with atlantoaxial instability and may result in stable fibrous non-union if treated non-operatively. The C1-C2 segment can be stabilised with atlantoaxial distraction arthrodesis achieved through an osteotomy of the pars interarticularis.

A new tool in percutaneous anterior odontoid screw fixation.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous anterior odontoid screw fixation for odontoid fractures remains challenging due to the complex anatomy of the craniocervical junction. We designed a new guide instrument to help with the placement of guide wire, which have achieved satisfying surgical results. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this new tool in percutaneous anterior odontoid screw fixation. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with odontoid fracture were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent percutaneous anterior odontoid screw fixation with the traditional guide instrument (n = 13) or the new guide instrument we designed (n = 16). The following clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups: operation time, radiograph times, incision length, blood loss, postoperative hospitalization, postoperative complications, bony union, fixation failure, and reoperation. Radiographs or CT scans were performed at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in preoperative demographic data between the two groups. The operation time (56.62 ± 8.32 Vs 49.63 ± 7.47, P = 0.025) and radiograph times (26.54 ± 6.94 Vs 20.50 ± 5.02, P = 0.011) of the designed guide instrument group were significantly lower than those of the traditional guide instrument group. There were no significant differences in incision length (16.08 ± 3.07 Vs 15.69 ± 2.73, P = 0.720), blood loss (16.08 ± 4.96 Vs 17.88 ± 5.98, P = 0.393), postoperative hospitalization (7.15 ± 1.91 Vs 6.88 ± 2.36, P = 0.734), postoperative complications (7.7% Vs 12.5%, P = 1), and bony union (92.3% Vs 93.8%, P = 1) between the two groups. No fixation failure or reoperation occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The top of our designed guide instrument is a wedge-shaped tip with 30° inclination, which has a large contact area with the anterior surface of the cervical vertebra. According to our retrospective study, the guide instrument can reduce the operation time and radiograph times. It has potential clinical value, which needs further testing with a higher level of research design.

Experience in surgical treatment of type â ¡ odontoid fractures: A report of two cases and review of the literature.

Two cases of type Ⅱ odontoid fractures were reported to share our experience in surgery treatment of such cases. A 33-year-old woman with comminuted type Ⅱ odontoid fracture and a 42-year-old man with fracture end hardened type Ⅱ odontoid fracture received surgical treatment in our hospital. Though imaging examination suggested that these two patients were suitable for anterior screw fixation, we encountered difficulties during the operation. The two patients eventually underwent posterior C1-C2 fusion surgery and recovered well. According to the experience of these two cases, we found that the fracture line angle and the degree of comminution are two important factors affecting surgical decision-making. Although anterior screw fixation is the ideal choice for type Ⅱ odontoid fractures with anterior superior to posterior inferior fracture line, it may not be the best choice for comminuted or fracture end hardened type Ⅱ odontoid fractures.

Anterior odontoid screw fixation extrusion as reason for oesophagus perforation.

BACKGROUND: Type II odontoid fractures are mostly encountered in the elderly. Due to a high risk of non-union fractures in the case of conservative treatment, surgical fixation is widely recommended. Anterior odontoid screw fixation (AOSF) is a method that allows for a wide range of cervical mobility, and it is a relatively safe procedure that is recommended as the method of choice, although rare complications can be fatal when it leads to life-threatening oesophageal perforation. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to present potential risk factors which lead to these rare complications, and possible methods of treatment. METHODS: This article presents the case of a patient hospitalised in the Neurosurgery Department of St Lukas Hosital in Tarnów in 2016. A literature review was performed using PubMed; search criteria included the phrases 'odontoid fracture perforation' and 'anterior cervical spine perforation'. The search returned 235 articles, of which 55 publications were in line with the subject of this paper, with only 12 deemed appropriate for consideration. RESULT: The authors present the case of an elderly patient with a history of odontoid fracture. Ten weeks after primary AOSF, the patient came to the Neurosurgery Department due to expectorating screws. This implied the need for further examination and even oesophageal reconstructive surgery or another spinal surgery. In laryngological examination and in gastroscopy there were no signs of fistula. In this case conservative treatment was proceeded. Due to odontoid fracture, non-union cervical posterior stabilisation was necessary. CONCLUSION: Patients with oesophageal perforation should be treated with special care.

C1-C2 posterior screw fixation in atlantoaxial fractures revisited: technical update based on 127 cases.

INTRODUCTION: Posterior fusion of traumatic odontoid fractures by C1 lateral mass and C2 isthmic screws (modified Harms-Goel technique) is a viable alternative to transarticular screw fixation due to its universal applicability. This retrospective study reports on a series of 127 patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our clinical database was screened for patients with fractures of the upper cervical spine incorporating a C2 fracture, operated on between 2007 and 2015. Patients were included if fused by internal fixation via C1 lateral mass screws, C2 isthmic screws in freehand technique under lateral fluoroscopy. Screw placement was controlled postoperatively by computed tomography and rated using the Gertzbein & Robbins classification. Surgery-related complications, consecutive treatment, revision surgeries and duration of surgeries were registered. RESULTS: In total, 127 patients were identified with altogether 572 screws. Correct screw positions of grade A and B according to Gertzbein & Robbins were achieved in a total of 539 (94.2%) screws (grade A: 453 (79.2%); grade B: 86 (15%)), grade C screw malpositions noted in 21 (3.7%), grade D in 10 (1.7%) and grade E in 2 (0.3%) screws. Vertebral artery canal breaches occurred in 29 screws (5.1%), with vertebral artery occlusion in 4 patients. Coiling of injured vertebral artery had to be performed in one patient. None of these patients suffered clinically apparent cerebrovascular complications. Revision surgery was performed in 8 patients (6%). CONCLUSION: Posterior fixation of atlantoaxial fractures by C1 lateral mass and C2 isthmic screws with fluoroscopy without navigation is a safe and feasible method but not free of risk of vertebral artery injuries. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

[Application of transarticular C1/2 screws connected with C1 lateral mass screws in a rod-screw system]. / Die Anwendung von transartikulären Schrauben C1/2, verbunden mit C1-Massa-lateralis-Schrauben in einem Schrauben-Stab-System.

Fractures of the second cervical vertebra with involvement of the odontoid process can mostly be treated conservatively by immobilization. In the case of high-grade unstable fractures and pseudarthrosis dorsal C1/2 spondylodesis should be considered.Based on established atlantoaxial osteosynthesis techniques for dorsal C1/2 spondylodesis, a polyaxial screw-rod system with C1/2 transarticular screws connected with C1 lateral mass screws was carried out in a 56-year-old male patient with dislocated odontoid fracture.No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. During a follow-up of 36 months there was no screw loosening or dislocation.The presented alternative technique of dorsal C1/2 spondylodesis is a safe and effective method for stabilizing the atlantoaxial movement segment in cases of posttraumatic instability.

Surgical treatment of type II odontoid fractures in elderly patients: a comparison of anterior odontoid screw fixation and posterior atlantoaxial fusion using the Magerl-Gallie technique.

PURPOSE: This single-centre retrospective study compared anterior odontoid screw fixation and posterior atlantoaxial fusion in the surgical treatment of type II B odontoid fractures according to Grauer in elderly patients. METHODS: Between 1994 and 2014, 133 consecutive patients above 60 years presenting with type II B odontoid fracture were treated surgically in our department. They were divided retrospectively into two groups. Group A included 47 patients in whom anterior odontoid screw fixation was performed. Group B with 86 patients underwent posterior atlantoaxial fusion. The clinical and radiological data were analysed. Any reoperation during the follow-up was recorded and evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age in group A (74.19 years) was significantly less than in group B (78.16 years). The mean operative time in group A (64.5 min) was significantly shorter than in group B (116 min). Again, the mean amount of blood loss in group A (79 ml) was significantly less than in group B (379 ml). The mean postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in group A (17.4 days) than in group B (30 days). The mean follow-up was 29.3 months in group A and 32 months in group B. The rate of pseudoarthrosis was significantly higher in group A (25.5%) than in group B (3.5%). Furthermore, the need for revision surgery was significantly increased in group A (23.4%) than in group B (10.47%). CONCLUSIONS: Odontoid screw fixation is a less invasive surgery for type II B odontoid fractures in elderly patients. However, posterior atlantoaxial fusion provides a superior surgical outcome regarding fracture healing and the need for surgical revisions. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Odontoid Fusion.

Anterior odontoid screw fixation allows for the internal fixation of unstable odontoid fractures with low morbidity, good fusion rates, and preservation of the atlanto-axial range of motion when applied in appropriate clinical cases. Advances in surgical techniques have allowed for safer, more minimally invasive approaches that reduce the risk of injury to vital prevertebral structures and minimize soft tissue retraction. Moreover, improvements in surgical image guidance technology for spinal surgery that have been applied to odontoid screw placement have helped improve surgeon confidence about exact screw trajectories. In this chapter, we review traditional screw placement techniques and highlight the trends in technical improvements that improve the safety and efficacy of these procedures.

Functional Outcome After Odontoid Fractures in the Elderly.

While several papers on mortality and the fusion rate in elderly patients treated surgically or non-surgically for odontoid fractures exist, little information is available on quality of life after treatment. The aim of treatment in these patients should not be fracture healing alone but also quality of life improvement.A literature search using PubMed identified seven papers including information on functional evaluation of 402 patients.Patients treated with anterior screw fixation had a good functional outcome in 92.6% of cases. This percentage seemed to decrease in octogenarians. Less information was available for patients treated with posterior approaches; it would seem that up to a half of such patients experienced pain and limitations in activities of daily living after surgery. Patients treated with a halo device had a functional outcome that was worse (or at least no better) than that of patients treated with surgery, with absence of limitations in activities of daily living in 77.3% of patients. Patients treated with a collar had a good functional outcome in the majority of cases, with absence of limitations in activities of daily living in 89% of patients.More studies are needed for evaluation of functional outcome, especially in patients treated with a collar, a halo device or a posterior approach.