Pregnancy outcomes in correlation with placental histopathology in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction with vs. without reduced fetal movements.

PURPOSE: Fetal movements are crucial indicators of fetal well-being, with reduced fetal movements (RFM) suggesting potential fetal compromise. Fetal growth restriction (FGR), often linked to placental insufficiency, is a major cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to investigate the neonatal, labor, and placental outcomes of FGR pregnancies with and without RFM at term. METHODS: In this retrospective study, data from all term, singleton deliveries with FGR and concomitant RFM were obtained and compared to an equal control group of FGR without RFM. Maternal characteristics, pregnancy and neonatal outcomes, and placental histology were compared. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify independent associations with adverse neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: During the study period, 250 FGR neonates with concomitant RFM and an equal control group were identified. The groups did not differ in maternal demographics aside from significantly higher rates of maternal smoking in the RFM group (p < 0.001). Polyhydramnios and oligohydramnios (p = 0.032 and p = 0.007, respectively) and meconium-stained amniotic fluid (p < 0.001) were more prevalent in the FGR+RFM group. Additionally, the RFM group showed higher rates of adverse neonatal outcomes despite having larger neonates (p = 0.047 and p < 0.001, respectively). No significant differences were observed in placental findings. Logistic regression identified RFM as an independent predictor of adverse neonatal outcomes (aOR 2.45, 95% CI 1.27-4.73, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Reduced fetal movements are significant and independent predictors of worse neonatal outcomes in FGR pregnancies, suggesting an additional acute insult on top of underlying placental insufficiency.

The CErebro Placental RAtio as indicator for delivery following perception of reduced fetal movements, protocol for an international cluster randomised clinical trial; the CEPRA study.

BACKGROUND: Routine assessment in (near) term pregnancy is often inaccurate for the identification of fetuses who are mild to moderately compromised due to placental insufficiency and are at risk of adverse outcomes, especially when fetal size is seemingly within normal range for gestational age. Although biometric measurements and cardiotocography are frequently used, it is known that these techniques have low sensitivity and specificity. In clinical practice this diagnostic uncertainty results in considerable 'over treatment' of women with healthy fetuses whilst truly compromised fetuses remain unidentified. The CPR is the ratio of the umbilical artery pulsatility index over the middle cerebral artery pulsatility index. A low CPR reflects fetal redistribution and is thought to be indicative of placental insufficiency independent of actual fetal size, and a marker of adverse outcomes. Its utility as an indicator for delivery in women with reduced fetal movements (RFM) is unknown. The aim of this study is to assess whether expedited delivery of women with RFM identified as high risk on the basis of a low CPR improves neonatal outcomes. Secondary aims include childhood outcomes, maternal obstetric outcomes, and the predictive value of biomarkers for adverse outcomes. METHODS: International multicentre cluster randomised trial of women with singleton pregnancies with RFM at term, randomised to either an open or concealed arm. Only women with an estimated fetal weight ≥ 10th centile, a fetus in cephalic presentation and normal cardiotocograph are eligible and after informed consent the CPR will be measured. Expedited delivery is recommended in women with a low CPR in the open arm. Women in the concealed arm will not have their CPR results revealed and will receive routine clinical care. The intended sample size based on the primary outcome is 2160 patients. The primary outcome is a composite of: stillbirth, neonatal mortality, Apgar score < 7 at 5 min, cord pH < 7.10, emergency delivery for fetal distress, and severe neonatal morbidity. DISCUSSION: The CEPRA trial will identify whether the CPR is a good indicator for delivery in women with perceived reduced fetal movements. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial registry (NTR), trial NL7557 . Registered 25 February 2019.

An emerging method in evaluation of reduced fetal movements using cerebroplacental ratio: A prospective case-control study.

AIM: Nearly half of the patients with stillbirths experience reduced fetal movements (RFM) in the preceding week. The standardized evaluation will help reduce stillbirths. Placental dysfunction is the underlying pathophysiology for RFM and low cerebroplacental ratio (CPR). We attempted to determine the application of CPR in evaluation of RFM. METHODS: A prospective case-control study with 100 patients each of cases and controls were studied at a tertiary care hospital. Middle cerebral artery pulsatility index (MCA-PI), umbilical artery PI (UA-PI), and CPR were calculated as multiples of median (MoM) in patients presenting with RFM after 30 weeks and their matched controls and followed up. CPR values of various gestation ranges and single versus multiple episodes of RFM were analyzed. RESULTS: Compared to controls, women with RFM showed a significantly low MCA PI MoM (0.94 vs 1.4; p = 0.00008) and low CPR MoM (1.48 vs 1.6; p = 0.015). Women with multiple RFM episodes had lower CPR MoM (1.2 vs 1.5; p < 0.00001) compared to single episode RFM. Multiple RFM episode patients had low MCA PI MoM (1.3 vs 1.4; p = 0.0038) and low CPR MoM (1.2 vs 1.6; p < 0.00001) compared to controls. There was a significantly low CPR in 32-34 weeks (1.35 vs 1.81; p = 0.004) and 36-38 weeks subgroups (1.39 vs 1.58; p = 0.002). No significant difference in birthweight centiles or AGA versus SGA categories between cases and controls was noted questioning current guidelines where ultrasound evaluation is done for RFM patients with FGR. CONCLUSION: Incorporation of routine CPR measurements can standardize evaluation of RFM patients, especially those with AGA to pick up patients at risk of poor outcome and bring down stillbirth rates.

Severe Neonatal Anemia Due to Spontaneous Massive Fetomaternal Hemorrhage at Term: An Illustrative Case with Suspected Antenatal Diagnosis and Brief Review of Current Knowledge.

Fetomaternal hemorrhage is defined as transfer of fetal blood into placental circulation and therefore into maternal circulation during pregnancy, and represents an important contributor to intrauterine fetal demise and neonatal death. The condition is rarely diagnosed prenatally because clinical findings are often nonspecific, and it is unpredictable. In this paper we present an illustrative case of massive spontaneous fetomaternal hemorrhage where the diagnosis was highly suspected antenatally based on maternal reported reduced fetal movements, abnormal suggestive cardiotocographic trace, and increased peak systolic velocity in the fetal middle cerebral artery. We discuss obstetrical and neonatal management and review the current knowledge in the literature. Maintaining a high index of suspicion for this condition allows the obstetrician to plan for adequate diagnostic tests, arrange intrauterine treatment or delivery, and prepare the neonatal team.

Mindfetalness to increase women's awareness of fetal movements and pregnancy outcomes: a cluster-randomised controlled trial including 39 865 women.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether a method for raising women's awareness of fetal movements, Mindfetalness, can affect pregnancy outcomes. DESIGN: Cluster-randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Sixty-seven maternity clinics in Stockholm, Sweden. POPULATION: Women with singleton pregnancy with birth from 32 weeks' gestation. METHODS: Women registered at a clinic randomised to Mindfetalness were assigned to receive a leaflet about Mindfetalness (n = 19 639) in comparison with routine care (n = 20 226). Data were collected from a population-based register. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes after birth, visit to healthcare due to decrease in fetal movements. Other outcomes: Apgar score <4 at 5 minutes after birth, small-for-gestational-age and mode of delivery. RESULTS: No difference (1.1 versus 1.1%, relative risk [RR] 1.0; 95% CI 0.8-1.2) was found between the Mindfetalness group and the Routine care group for a 5-minute Apgar score <7. Women in the Mindfetalness group contacted healthcare more often due to decreased fetal movements (6.6 versus 3.8%, RR 1.72; 95% CI 1.57-1.87). Mindfetalness was associated with a reduction of babies born small-for-gestational-age (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90-1.00), babies born after gestational week 41+6 (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83-0.98) and caesarean sections (19.0 versus 20.0%, RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.91-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Mindfetalness did not reduce the number of babies born with an Apgar score <7. However, Mindfetalness was associated with the health benefits of decreased incidence of caesarean section and fewer children born small-for-gestational-age. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Introducing Mindfetalness in maternity care decreased caesarean sections but had no effect on the occurrence of Apgar scores <7.

Risk factors for poor neonatal outcome in pregnancies with decreased fetal movements.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of Swedish stillbirths has varied little in the past 40 years, with a reported frequency of 400-450 stillbirths/y (approximately 4‰), despite increased information about fetal movement in the media and awareness among healthcare providers. The objectives of this project were to describe the outcome of pregnancies with reduced fetal movement in a Swedish context and to investigate factors associated with poor neonatal outcome in this group. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed at Soder Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. All single pregnancies at the hospital from January 2016 to December 2017 presenting with reduced fetal movement after 22 gestational weeks were included in the study. A composite neonatal outcome was constructed: 5-minute Apgar score ≤7, arterial pH in the umbilical cord ≤7.10, transfer to neonatal care unit for further care or intrauterine fetal death. RESULTS: For women seeking care for reduced fetal movement, the occurrence of composite poor neonatal outcome ranged from 6.2% to 18.4% within different groups. The highest risk for poor neonatal outcome (18.4%) was found in the group of women with a small-for-gestational-age fetus. Another high-risk group (12.8%) was the one comprising women with normal birthweight/large-for-gestational-age fetuses with an in vitro fertilization pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The highest incidence of poor neonatal outcome among women with reduced fetal movement was found in the groups with small-for-gestational-age fetuses in nulliparous and multiparous women. A routine ultrasound assessment for fetal growth in third trimester is supposedly most efficient to identify undiagnosed small for gestational age.

Reduced fetal movements at term in singleton low risk pregnancies-Is there an association with placental histopathological findings?

INTRODUCTION: Maternal perception of fetal movements has long been considered an indicator of fetal well-being. A sudden decrease in the number of fetal movements is suggestive of fetal compromise. We aimed to determine whether the maternal perception of reduced fetal movements (RFM) is associated with placental pathological lesions in a low-risk term population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our study was a case-control study that was performed in a single university center. Placental histopathology, maternal demographics, labor characteristics, and neonatal outcomes of term, singleton pregnancies with maternal perception of RFM during the 2 weeks prior to delivery were collected. To isolate the effect of RFM on placental pathology, we excluded cases complicated by preterm birth, hypertensive disorders, diabetes mellitus, small-for-gestational-age and congenital/genetic anomalies. We compared pregnancy outcomes and placental pathology between the RFM group and a control group matched for gestational age and mode of delivery. Placental lesions were classified according to the "Amsterdam" criteria. Composite adverse neonatal outcome was defined as one or more of the following: sepsis, transfusion, hypoglycemia, phototherapy, respiratory morbidity, cerebral morbidity, necrotizing enterocolitis and fetal/neonatal death. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify independent associations with adverse neonatal outcome. RESULTS: We included patients who gave birth from January 2008 until May 2019. The study group included 203 term pregnancies with RFM during the 2 weeks prior to delivery, which was matched with 203 controls. The RFM group was characterized by a higher rate of placental weight <10th percentile (22.6% vs. 3.9%, P < .001), a higher rate of maternal vascular malperfusion lesions (30.5% vs. 18.7%, P = .007) and lesions of maternal inflammatory response (43.3% vs. 29.5%, P = .005). At delivery, the RFM group had higher rates of cesarean delivery due to non-reassuring fetal heart rate monitoring (P = .01), 5-minute Apgar score ≤7 (P = .03), neonatal intensive care unit admissions (P < .001) and composite adverse neonatal outcomes (P = .007). Using multivariable analysis, RFM (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-4.8), and placental maternal vascular malperfusion lesions (aOR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0-2.9) were independently associated with adverse neonatal outcome. CONCLUSIONS: After excluding important placental-related morbidities, RFM was associated with a higher rate of placental weight <10th percentile and placental maternal vascular malperfusion lesions vs. controls. This study suggests a placental involvement in the association between RFM at term and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Reduced fetal movements at term, low-risk pregnancies: is it associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes? Ten years of experience from a single tertiary center.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the outcomes of low-risk pregnancies complicated by isolated reduced fetal movements (RFM) at term. STUDY DESIGN: The study population were patients at term, with singleton, low-risk, pregnancies who presented to our obstetric-triage and delivered during the subsequent 2 weeks. The study group included patients with an isolated complaint of RFM (RFM group). The control group included patients without history of RFM (control group). The pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes were compared between the groups. Severe and mild composites of adverse neonatal outcomes were defined. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify independent association with adverse neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: Among the 13,338 pregnant women, 2762 (20.7%) were included in the RFM group and 10,576 (79.3%) in the control group. The RFM group had higher rates of nulliparity (p < 0.001), and smoking (p < 0.001). At admission, the RFM group had higher rates of IUFD (p < 0.001). The RFM group had higher rates of Cesarean delivery due to non-reassuring fetal monitor (p < 0.001), and mild adverse neonatal outcomes (p = 0.001). RFM was associated with mild adverse outcome independent of background confounders (aOR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-2.6, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients presented with isolated RFM at term had higher rates of IUFD at presentation and significant adverse outcomes at delivery.

The outcomes of pregnancies with reduced fetal movements: A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to examine the outcomes and interventions in pregnant women presenting with a perception of reduced fetal movements (RFM), and to determine if repeated episodes of RFM increase the risk of adverse outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in six NHS hospitals within the Thames Valley network region, UK and one neighboring hospital, an area with approximately 31 000 births annually. All women with a primary presentation of perceived RFM after 24 completed weeks of gestation during the month of October 2016 were included in the study. Prospective records in all units were examined and individual case-notes were reviewed. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes and their relation with recurrent presentations with RFM were examined using relative risks with 95% CI. The main outcome measures are described. Neonatal outcomes measured were perinatal mortality, neonatal unit admission, abnormal cardiotocography at presentation, a composite severe morbidity outcome of Apgar <7 at 5 minutes or arterial pH <7.0 or encephalopathy, and birthweight. Pregnancy outcomes measured were induction of labor, cesarean section, admission and ultrasound usage rates. RESULTS: In all, 591 women presented with RFM during the month; using annual hospital birth figures, the incidence of RFM was estimated at 22.6% (range 14.9%-32.5%). More than 1 presentation of RFM occurred in 273 (46.2%). All 3 deaths (0.5%) were at the first presentation. More than 1 presentation was associated with higher induction rates (56.0% vs 31.9%), but no increase in any adverse outcomes including small-for-gestational-age. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced fetal movements, and recurrent episodes, are common, and lead to considerable resource usage and obstetric intervention. We found no evidence to suggest that recurrent episodes increase pregnancy risk.

Reduced fetal movements and cerebroplacental ratio: evidence for worsening fetal hypoxemia.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the fetal cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) in women presenting with reduced fetal movements (RFM). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of data collected over an 8-year period at a fetal medicine unit at a tertiary referral center. The cohort comprised 4500 singleton pregnancies presenting with RFM at or after 36 weeks' gestation and 1527 control pregnancies at a similar gestational age without RFM. Fetal biometry and Doppler parameters were recorded and converted into centiles and multiples of the median (MoM). CPR was defined as the ratio between the fetal middle cerebral artery (MCA) pulsatility index (PI) and the umbilical artery (UA) PI. Subgroup analysis for fetal size and for single vs multiple episodes of RFM was performed. RESULTS: Compared with controls, pregnancies with RFM had lower MCA-PI MoM (median, 0.95 vs 0.97; P < 0.001) and CPR MoM (median, 0.97 vs 0.99; P = 0.018). Compared with women presenting with single episodes of RFM, pregnancies with multiple episodes (≥ 2 episodes) had lower CPR MoM (median, 0.94 vs 0.98; P = 0.003). On subgroup analysis for fetal size, compared with controls, appropriate-for-gestational-age fetuses in the RFM group had lower MCA-PI MoM (median, 0.96 vs 0.97; P = 0.003) and higher rate of CPR below the 5th centile (5.3% vs 3.6%; P = 0.015). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated an association of risk of recurrent RFM with maternal age (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99), non-Caucasian ethnicity (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53-0.97), estimated fetal weight centile (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02) and CPR MoM (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.12-0.47). CONCLUSION: Pregnancies complicated by multiple episodes of RFM show significantly lower CPR MoM and MCA-PI MoM compared with those with single episodes and controls. This is likely to be due to worsening fetal hypoxemia in women presenting with recurrent RFM. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Saving babies' lives project impact and results evaluation (SPiRE): a mixed methodology study.

BACKGROUND: Reducing stillbirth and early neonatal death is a national priority in the UK. Current evidence indicates this is potentially achievable through application of four key interventions within routine maternity care delivered as the National Health Service (NHS) England's Saving Babies' Lives care bundle. However, there is significant variation in the degree of implementation of the care bundle between and within maternity units and the effectiveness in reducing stillbirth and improving service delivery has not yet been evaluated. This study aims to evaluate the impact of implementing the care bundle on UK maternity services and perinatal outcomes. METHODS: The Saving Babies' Lives Project Impact and Results Evaluation (SPiRE) study is a multicentre evaluation of maternity care delivered through the Saving Babies' Lives care bundle using both quantitative and qualitative methodologies. The study will be conducted in twenty NHS Hospital Trusts and will include approximately 100,000 births. It involves participation by both service users and care providers. To determine the impact of the care bundle on pregnancy outcomes, birth data and other clinical measures will be extracted from maternity databases and case-note audit from before and after implementation. Additionally, this study will employ questionnaires with organisational leads and review clinical guidelines to assess how resources, leadership and governance may affect implementation in diverse hospital settings. The cost of implementing the care bundle, and the cost per stillbirth avoided, will also be estimated as part of a health economic analysis. The views and experiences of service users and service providers towards maternity care in relation to the care bundle will be also be sought using questionnaires. DISCUSSION: This protocol describes a pragmatic study design which is necessarily limited by the availability of data and limitations of timescales and funding. In particular there was no opportunity to prospectively gather pre-intervention data or design a phased implementation such as a stepped-wedge study. Nevertheless this study will provide useful practice-based evidence which will advance knowledge about the processes that underpin successful implementation of the care bundle so that it can be further developed and refined. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03231007 (26th July 2017).

Women's and clinicians perspectives of presentation with reduced fetal movements: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Worldwide maternal perception of fetal movements has been used for many years to evaluate fetal wellbeing. It is intuitively regarded as an expression of fetal well-being as pregnancies in which women consistently report regular fetal movements have very low morbidity and mortality. Conversely, maternal perception of reduced fetal movements is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. We sought to gain insight into pregnant women's and clinicians views and experiences of reduced movements. METHOD: We performed qualitative semi-structured interviews with pregnant women who experienced reduced fetal movements in their current pregnancy and health professionals who provide maternity care. Our aim was to develop a better understanding of events, facilitators and barriers to presentation with reduced fetal movements. Data analysis was conducted using framework analysis principles. RESULTS: Twenty-one women and 10 clinicians were interviewed. The themes that emerged following the final coding were influences of social network, facilitators and barriers to presentation and the desire for normality. CONCLUSIONS: This study aids understanding about why women present with reduced movements and how they reach the decision to attend hospital. This should inform professionals' views and practice, such that appreciating and addressing women's concerns may reduce anxiety and make presentation with further reduced movements more likely, which is desirable as this group is at increased risk of adverse outcome. To address problems with information about normal and abnormal fetal movements, high-quality information is needed that is accessible to women and their families.

Number of episodes of reduced fetal movement at term: association with adverse perinatal outcome.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were evaluation of the association of reduced fetal movements (RFM) and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) birth at term and to explore if fetal and maternal outcomes are different with single vs repeated episodes of RFM and normal fetal assessment test results. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of all singleton pregnancies referred for RFMs at a tertiary fetal medicine unit from January 2008 through September 2014. Ultrasound and Doppler indices were obtained from a computerized ultrasound database and pregnancy outcome was collected from hospital records. RESULTS: Of the 21,944 women with a singleton pregnancy booked for maternity care during the study period, 1234 women (5.62%) reported RFMs >36+0 weeks. Of these, 1029 women (83.4%) reported a single episode of RFM and 205 (16.6%) had ≥2 presentations for RFM. Women with repeated RFMs had a significantly higher mean uterine artery pulsatility index in the second trimester. The prevalence of SGA baby at birth in women presenting with a single episode as compared to repeated episodes of RFM was 9.8% and 44.2%, respectively (odds ratio, 7.3; 95% confidence interval, 5.1-10.4; P < .05). CONCLUSION: Repeated episodes of RFMs at term are more likely to occur in women with high second-trimester uterine artery Doppler resistance indices and are strongly associated with the birth of SGA infants. Women presenting with repeated episodes of RFM should be treated as being at high risk of placental dysfunction irrespective of the results of prenatal ultrasound and Doppler assessment.

Association between reduced fetal movements at term and abnormal uterine artery Doppler indices.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between second-trimester uterine artery (UtA) Doppler pulsatility index (PI) with reduced fetal movements (RFM) and adverse pregnancy outcome at term. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all singleton pregnancies referred for routine antenatal care at a fetal medicine unit over a 5-year period. UtA Doppler indices were obtained at the time of the routine anomaly scan between 19 and 23 weeks' gestation to assess the risk for pre-eclampsia. All episodes of RFM within 1 month of the expected date of delivery were recorded. Regression and sensitivity analyses were used to assess the relationship between UtA-PI with RFM, small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses and stillbirth after 36 weeks' gestation. RESULTS: Overall, 17, 649 pregnancies were included in the analysis, of which 742 presented with RFM, 1494 gave birth to an SGA newborn and 53 were complicated by stillbirth after 36 weeks' gestation. Logistic regression analysis showed a significant and independent association between UtA-PI and RFM (odds ratio (OR), 5.03 (95% CI, 4.21-6.01); P < 0.001), SGA (OR 2.41 (95% CI, 2.09-2.79); P < 0.001) and stillbirth (OR 1.55 (95% CI, 1.21-1.98); P< 0.001). The association between UtA-PI and SGA was significantly stronger in women presenting with RFM than in the rest of the cohort (P < 0.001). Similarly the association between UtA-PI and RFM was significantly stronger in those pregnancies complicated by stillbirth (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with normal pregnancies, those complicated by RFM, SGA and stillbirth at term had higher UtA-PI at 19-23 weeks' gestation. These findings support the assertion that RFM at term is independently related to placental dysfunction and subsequent risk for SGA and stillbirth.

Pregnancy, birth and neonatal outcomes associated with reduced fetal movements: A systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomised studies.

PROBLEM: Maternal perception of reduced fetal movements (RFM) is identified as an important alarm signal for possible risk of impending adverse perinatal outcomes. BACKGROUND: Perinatal outcomes associated with RFM are increasingly being investigated in non-randomised studies with several associated outcomes, including stillbirth, preterm birth, fetal growth restriction and neonatal death being reported. Findings from studies, however, are conflicting. AIM: To synthesise the findings of published studies regarding pregnancy, birth and neonatal outcomes in women who presented with RFM. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL complete, Maternity and Infant Care, PsycINFO, and Science Citation Index databases were searched up to 8th July 2021 and updated again on 8th September 2022. Non-randomised studies involving pregnant women ≥24 weeks' gestation, who presented with a primary complaint of RFM compared to women who did not present with RFM were included. Data were meta-analysed using a random-effects model and presented as Odds Ratios (OR) or Standard Mean Differences (SMD) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI). FINDINGS: Thirty-nine studies were included. Women with RFM had increased odds of stillbirth (OR 3.44, 95% CI 2.02-5.88) and small for gestational age (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.16-1.61) when compared with women who did not have RFM. Associations were also found for induction of labor, instrumental birth and caesarean section but not for preterm birth (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.71-1.19) or neonatal death (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.52-1.90). CONCLUSION: This review revealed that RFM is associated with increased odds of stillbirth, small for gestational age, induction of labor, instrumental birth and caesarean section but not preterm birth or neonatal death.

Reduced fetal movements is twin pregnancies and the association with adverse neonatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Reduced fetal movements (RFM) is an obstetric complaint known to be associated with adverse neonatal outcomes and should serve as an alarming sign in obstetric triage. Whether this assumption holds for twin pregnancies, is still an obstetric enigma, and this complaint is sometimes overlooked in twins. We, therefore, aimed to study neonatal outcomes in twin pregnancies complicated by RFM. We hypothesised that in twin pregnancy, maternal ability to perceive RFM will be limited, and therefore, will not be associated with adverse neonatal outcome. STUDY DESIGN: Included were all dichorionic twin pregnancies between 2009-2019 who presented to our obstetric triage at a gestational age >34 weeks with an isolated complaint of RFM and delivered during the subsequent two weeks (RFM group). The control group included patients with twin pregnancies (matched for gestational age and maternal age) who presented for routine assessment and reported regular fetal movements throughout pregnancy (no RFM group). Data regarding pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes were compared between the groups. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes, which included one or more of the following: neonatal hypoglycemia, respiratory morbidity, cerebral morbidity, phototherapy, neonatal sepsis, blood transfusions, necrotizing enterocolitis, or neonatal death. Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify independent associations with adverse neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: Maternal demographics and gestational age at delivery did not differ between the RFM group (n = 83 pregnancies and 166 neonates) and the no RFM group (n = 83 pregnancies and 166 neonates). Neonatal birthweights, as well as the rate of birthweights <10th centile, did not differ between the groups. There were 2 cases of fetal demise diagnosed at triage in the RFM group. The rate of the primary outcome, as well as NICU admissions, were significantly higher in the RFM group compared to the no RFM group (29.5 % vs. 19.2 %, p = 0.01 and 32.5 % vs. 19.2 %, p = 0.001). In multivariable analysis RFM (aOR = 1.18, 95 % CI = 1.06-2.73), and GA at delivery (aOR = 0.88, 95 % CI = 0.67-0.97) were associated with adverse neonatal outcome-independent from background confounders. CONCLUSION: Patients presented to obstetric triage with twin pregnancies and isolated RFM had higher rates of adverse neonatal outcomes and NICU admissions compared to twin pregnancies without RFM.

Daily structured approach to awareness of fetal movements and pregnancy outcome - a prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated how women, seeking care due to decreased movements, had paid attention to fetal movements and if the method of monitoring was associated with pregnancy outcome. METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed to women from gestational week 28, who had sought care due to decreased fetal movements in Stockholm between January 1st and December 31st, 2014. Women were included in the study if the examination did not reveal any signs of a compromised fetus requiring immediate intervention. Birth outcome and sociodemographic data were collected from the obstetric record register. RESULTS: There were 29166 births in Stockholm in 2014, we have information from 2683 women who sought care for decreased fetal movements. The majority (96.6%) of the women stated that they paid attention to fetal movements. Some women observed fetal movements weekly (17.2%) and 69.5% concentrated on fetal movements daily (non-structured group). One in ten (9.9%) used counting methods daily for observing fetal movements (structured group). Women in the structured group more often had caesarean section before onset of labor (RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.2) and a lower risk of their baby being transferred to neonatal nursery (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.03-0.94) compared to women in the non-structured group. CONCLUSIONS: Women, who had a daily and structured approach to awareness of fetal movements, were more likely to have a caesarean section but their babies were less likely to be transferred to a neonatal nursery as compared with women who used a non-structured method daily.

Risk factors for reduced fetal movements in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Maternal perception of reduced fetal movements (RFM) is an important clinical marker to identify women at higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Preventing and reducing stillbirths can only be achieved through better detection and management of women with RFM, however the characteristics of women who present with RFM in pregnancy vary. A systematic review was conducted to explore the risk factors associated with reduced fetal movements (RFM) in pregnancy. PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care, PsycINFO and Science Citation Index were searched, from their inception date, for studies published up to 16th May 2019. Non-randomised observational studies reporting risk factors in pregnant women presenting with a primary complaint of RFM during pregnancy were included. The quality of the included studies was assessed with the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3 software for each identified risk factor where two or more studies reported on the same risk factor. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Twenty-seven studies reporting on risk factors for RFM during pregnancy were included. Women presenting with RFM during pregnancy are more likely to be Caucasian, smokers, and have an anterior placenta, oligohydramnios and polyhydramnios. No difference was found in parity or the mean age of women presenting with RFM and women who did not present with RFM. Previous caesarean section, postdates >42 weeks', and other medical conditions, including diabetes and hypertensive disorders were not predictive for RFM during pregnancy. Modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors associated with RFM in pregnancy were identified. These results can be used to raise awareness of factors associated with RFM, and prompt women to attend their maternity care provider should concerns arise.

Effect of the use of a national information brochure about fetal movements on patient delay.

BACKGROUND: Perinatal audits in the Netherlands showed that stillbirth was nearly always preceded by a period of reduced fetal movements. Patient or caregiver delay was identified as a substandard care factor. AIM: To determine whether the use of a new information brochure for pregnant women on fetal movements results in less patient delay in contacting their maternity caregiver. METHODS: A pre- and post-survey cohort study in the Netherlands, including 140 women in maternity care with a singleton pregnancy, expecting their first child. All participating women filled out a baseline questionnaire, Cambridge Worry Scale and pre-test questionnaire at the gestational age of 22-24 weeks. Subsequently, the intervention group received a newly developed information brochure on fetal movements. At a gestational age of 28 weeks, all women received the post-test questionnaire. Multiple regression analyses were used. FINDINGS: Per-protocol analysis showed less patient delay in the intervention group compared to the control group (Odds Ratio 0.43; 95% Confidence Interval 0.17-0.86, p=0.02). A significant linear relation was observed between reading the information brochure and an increase of knowledge about fetal movements (B=1.2, 95% Confidence Interval 1.0-1.4, p<0.001). Maternal concerns did not affect patient delay to report reduced fetal movements. CONCLUSION: Use of an information brochure regarding fetal movements has the potential to reduce patient delay and increase knowledge about reduced fetal movements. A national survey to determine the effect of an information brochure about reduced fetal movements on patient delay and stillbirth rates is needed.

"Better safe than sorry"-Reasons for consulting care due to decreased fetal movements.

BACKGROUND: Experience of reduced fetal movements is a common reason for consulting health care in late pregnancy. There is an association between reduced fetal movements and stillbirth. AIM: To explore why women decide to consult health care due to reduced fetal movements at a specific point in time and investigate reasons for delaying a consultation. METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed at all birth clinics in Stockholm during 2014, to women seeking care due to reduced fetal movements. In total, 3555 questionnaires were collected, 960 were included in this study. The open-ended question; "Why, specifically, do you come to the clinic today?" was analyzed using content analysis as well as the complementary question "Are there any reasons why you did not come to the clinic earlier?" RESULTS: Five categories were revealed: Reaching dead line, Receiving advice from health care professionals, Undergoing unmanageable worry, Contributing external factors and Not wanting to jeopardize the health of the baby. Many women stated that they decided to consult care when some time with reduced fetal movements had passed. The most common reason for not consulting care earlier was that it was a new experience. Some women stated that they did not want to feel that they were annoying, or be perceived as excessively worried. Not wanting to burden health care unnecessarily was a reason for prehospital delay. CONCLUSION: Worry about the baby is the crucial reason for consulting care as well as the time which has passed since the women first experienced decreased fetal movements.