Hinotori Surgical Robot System, a novel robot-assisted surgical platform: Preclinical and clinical evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System in preclinical and clinical studies. METHODS: Preclinical studies on 10 living female porcine and four fresh male cadavers were conducted. Different types of urologic surgical procedures were performed by experienced urological surgeons using the hinotori system: partial nephrectomy, vesicourethral anastomosis, and pelvic lymph node dissection in porcine, and partial nephrectomy, radical prostatectomy, and pelvic lymph node dissection in cadavers. In a multi-institutional single-arm clinical study, radical prostatectomy was performed in 30 patients with localized prostate cancer to evaluate safety outcomes. The primary endpoint was safety profiles, including device errors and perioperative complications, and the secondary endpoints were console time, blood loss, and positive surgical margin rate. RESULTS: The preclinical results were similar to those reported for the daVinci surgical system. The performance of the hinotori was equivalent to that of the daVinci surgical system, based on a global assessment by the surgeons. Safety was confirmed in a first-in-human clinical study of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using hinotori in 30 patients. The procedures were completed as planned in all cases, and three (10%) perioperative adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The safety of the newly developed hinotori surgical system was shown in the present preclinical and clinical studies. Further studies are required to confirm its clinical efficacy.

Effect of da Vinci robot-assisted versus traditional thoracoscopic bronchial sleeve lobectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the short-term effect of Da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic (RATS) bronchial sleeve lobectomy, so as to summarize its safety and effectiveness. METHODS: It was a retrospective single-center study with the inclusion of 22 cases receiving RATS lobectomy and 49 cases of traditional thoracoscopic surgery. Further comparison was performed focusing on the baseline characteristics and perioperative performance of the two groups. RESULTS: Compared with the traditional thoracoscopic surgery group, RATS group had more advantages in the number of lymph nodes dissected (P = 0.003), shorter postoperative length of stay in the hospital (P = 0.040), shorter drainage time (P = 0.022), reduced drainage volume (P = 0.001). Moreover, this study found for the first time that there was a shortening in the operation of sleeve lobectomy by using Da Vinci robot-assisted surgical system (P = 0.001). The operation cost of RATS group is more expensive (96000 ± 9100.782 vs 63000 ± 5102.563 yuan; P＜0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared with the traditional thoracoscopic bronchial sleeve lobectomy, RATS lobectomy shows advantages of higher operating sensitivity, shorter operation time, faster postoperative recovery, and more lymph nodes dissected. Collectively, RATS bronchial sleeve lobectomy is safe and effective in operation.

Combining robot-assisted surgical system and 3D visualization system for teaching minimally invasive vitreoretinal surgery.

AIM: To investigate the feasibility of teaching minimally invasive vitreoretinal surgery with a robot-assisted surgical system and a three-dimensional (3D) visualization system. METHODS: Enucleated porcine eyes were established as an animal model for removing foreign bodies. Forty medical students were recruited to remove foreign bodies to compare the traditional microscope and the 3D system. One junior resident performed the surgical task with manual and robot-assisted operations on 20 porcine eyes for each group. One senior surgeon evaluated the retinal invasion by a graded injury degree. The learning curve for minimally invasive vitreoretinal surgery was described. RESULTS: Compared with the robot-assisted group, the injury degree was higher in the manual group. For the first ten surgeries, the manual and robot-assisted groups had injuries of 2.60±1.35 (4 to 0) and 1.80±1.62 (4 to 0), respectively. For the last ten surgeries, the injury degrees were 1.90±1.20 (3 to 0) and 0.80±0.42 (1 to 0). Considering the manual and robot-assisted groups together, 95%, 75% and 60% of the students considered surgical manipulation with the 3D visualization system to be more comfortable, easier and clearer, respectively. CONCLUSION: The robot-assisted surgical system and 3D visualization system may have value in teaching minimally invasive vitreoretinal surgery.

[Comparison of accuracy between robot-assisted and fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous pedicle screw placement for treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis].

Objective: To explore the clinical application value of the spinal robot-assisted surgical system in mild to moderate lumbar spondylolisthesis and evaluate the accuracy of its implantation. Methods: The clinical data of 56 patients with Meyerding grade Ⅰ or Ⅱ lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) between January 2017 and December 2017 were retrospectively analysed. Among them, 28 cases were preoperatively planned with robotic arm and percutaneous pedicle screw placement according to preoperative planning (group A); the other 28 cases underwent fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous pedicle screw placement (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, slippage type, Meyerding grade, and surgical segmental distribution between the two groups ( P>0.05). The screw insertion angle was measured by CT, the accuracy of screw implantation was evaluated by Neo's criteria, and the invasion of superior articular process was evaluated by Babu's method. Results: One hundred and twelve screws were implanted in the two groups respectively, 5 screws (4.5%) in group A and 26 screws (23.2%) in group B penetrated the lateral wall of pedicle, and the difference was significant ( χ2=9.157, P=0.002); the accuracy of nail implantation was assessed according to Neo's criteria, the results were 107 screws of degree 0, 3 of degree 1, 2 of degree 2 in group A, and 86 screws of degree 0, 16 of degree 1, 6 of degree 2, 4 of degree 3 in group B, showing significant difference between the two groups ( Z=4.915, P=0.031). In group B, 20 (17.9%) screws penetrated the superior articular process, while in group A, 80 screws were removed from the decompression side, and only 3 (3.8%) screws penetrated the superior articular process. According to Babu's method, the degree of screw penetration into the facet joint was assessed. The results were 77 screws of grade 0, 2 of grade 1, 1 of grade 2 in group A, and 92 screws of grade 0, 13 of grade 1, 4 of grade 2, 3 of grade 3 in group B, showing significant difference between the two groups ( Z=7.814, P=0.029). The screw insertion angles of groups A and B were (23.5±6.6)° and (18.1±7.5)° respectively, showing significant difference ( t=3.100, P=0.003). Conclusion: Compared to fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous pedicle screw placement, robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement has the advantages such as greater accuracy, lower incidence of screw penetration of the pedicle wall and invasion of the facet joints, and has a better screw insertion angle. Combined with MIS-TLIF, robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement is an effective minimally invasive treatment for lumbar spondylolisthesis.