Postoperative ileus after digestive surgery: Network meta-analysis of pharmacological intervention.

AIMS: Several medicinal treatments for avoiding postoperative ileus (POI) after abdominal surgery have been evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This network meta-analysis aimed to explore the relative effectiveness of these different treatments on ileus outcome measures. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to identify RCTs comparing treatments for POI following abdominal surgery. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed. Direct and indirect comparisons of all regimens were simultaneously compared using random-effects network meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 38 RCTs were included in this network meta-analysis reporting on 6371 patients. Our network meta-analysis shows that prokinetics significantly reduce the duration of first gas (mean difference [MD] = 16 h; credible interval -30, -3.1; surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] 0.418), duration of first bowel movements (MD = 25 h; credible interval -39, -11; SUCRA 0.25) and duration of postoperative hospitalization (MD -1.9 h; credible interval -3.8, -0.040; SUCRA 0.34). Opioid antagonists are the only treatment that significantly improve the duration of food recovery (MD -19 h; credible interval -26, -14; SUCRA 0.163). CONCLUSION: Based on our meta-analysis, the 2 most consistent pharmacological treatments able to effectively reduce POI after abdominal surgery are prokinetics and opioid antagonists. The absence of clear superiority of 1 treatment over another highlights the limits of the pharmacological principles available.

Targeting TRPV1 and TRPA1: A feasible strategy for natural herbal medicines to combat postoperative ileus.

Under physiological or pathological conditions, transient receptor potential (TRP) channel vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) and TRP ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) possess the ability to detect a vast array of stimuli and execute diverse functions. Interestingly, increasing works have reported that activation of TRPV1 and TRPA1 could also be beneficial for ameliorating postoperative ileus (POI). Increasing research has revealed that the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is rich in TRPV1/TRPA1, which can be stimulated by capsaicin, allicin and other compounds. This activation stimulates a variety of neurotransmitters, leading to increased intestinal motility and providing protective effects against GI injury. POI is the most common emergent complication following abdominal and pelvic surgery, and is characterized by postoperative bowel dysfunction, pain, and inflammatory responses. It is noteworthy that natural herbs are gradually gaining recognition as a potential therapeutic option for POI due to the lack of effective pharmacological interventions. Therefore, the focus of this paper is on the TRPV1/TRPA1 channel, and an analysis and summary of the processes and mechanism by which natural herbs activate TRPV1/TRPA1 to enhance GI motility and relieve pain are provided, which will lay the foundation for the development of natural herb treatments for this disease.

Efficacy of Naldemedine on Intestinal Hypomotility and Adhesions in Rodent Models of Postoperative Ileus.

Postoperative ileus (POI) often decreases patients' QOL because of prolonged hospitalization and readmission. Alvimopan, a peripheral µ-opioid receptor antagonist, is currently the only therapeutic drug for POI. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of naldemedine (a peripheral µ-opioid receptor antagonist with a non-competitive pharmacological profile different from that of alvimopan) on postoperative intestinal hypomotility and adhesion in rodent models, and compare it with the effects of alvimopan. Oral administration of naldemedine (0.3 mg/kg) and alvimopan (3 mg/kg) significantly inhibited the decrease in intestinal motility induced by mechanical irritation in mice (p < 0.01, for both). Naldemedine (1 mg/kg) significantly shortened the adhesion length in chemical-induced postoperative adhesion model rats (p < 0.05). Alvimopan (3 mg/kg) also significantly reduced the adhesion ratio (p < 0.01). These findings suggest that naldemedine is effective for postoperative intestinal hypomotility and adhesions in rodents (i.e., as for alvimopan). Thus, naldemedine may be a useful option for the treatment of POI.

Preoperative combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation for preventing complications in elective colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: The success of elective colorectal surgery is mainly influenced by the surgical procedure and postoperative complications. The most serious complications include anastomotic leakages and surgical site infections (SSI)s, which can lead to prolonged recovery with impaired long-term health.  Compared with other abdominal procedures, colorectal resections have an increased risk of adverse events due to the physiological bacterial colonisation of the large bowel. Preoperative bowel preparation is used to remove faeces from the bowel lumen and reduce bacterial colonisation. This bowel preparation can be performed mechanically and/or with oral antibiotics. While mechanical bowel preparation alone is not beneficial, the benefits and harms of combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation is still unclear. OBJECTIVES: To assess the evidence for the use of combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation for preventing complications in elective colorectal surgery. SEARCH METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and trial registries on 15 December 2021. In addition, we searched reference lists and contacted colorectal surgery organisations. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adult participants undergoing elective colorectal surgery comparing combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation (MBP+oAB) with either MBP alone, oAB alone, or no bowel preparation (nBP). We excluded studies in which no perioperative intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis was given. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures as recommended by Cochrane. Pooled results were reported as mean difference (MD) or risk ratio (RR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) using the Mantel-Haenszel method. The certainty of the evidence was assessed with GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We included 21 RCTs analysing 5264 participants who underwent elective colorectal surgery. None of the included studies had a high risk of bias, but two-thirds of the included studies raised some concerns. This was mainly due to the lack of a predefined analysis plan or missing information about the randomisation process. Most included studies investigated both colon and rectal resections due to malignant and benign surgical indications. For MBP as well as oAB, the included studies used different regimens in terms of agent(s), dosage and timing.  Data for all predefined outcomes could be extracted from the included studies. However, only four studies reported on side effects of bowel preparation, and none recorded the occurrence of adverse effects such as dehydration, electrolyte imbalances or the need to discontinue the intervention due to side effects. Seventeen trials compared MBP+oAB with sole MBP. The incidence of SSI could be reduced through MBP+oAB by 44% (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.74; 3917 participants from 16 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) and the risk of anastomotic leakage could be reduced by 40% (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.99; 2356 participants from 10 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). No difference between the two comparison groups was found with regard to mortality (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.27 to 2.82; 639 participants from 3 studies; moderate-certainty evidence), the incidence of postoperative ileus (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.32; 2013 participants from 6 studies, low-certainty of evidence) and length of hospital stay (MD -0.19, 95% CI -1.81 to 1.44; 621 participants from 3 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Three trials compared MBP+oAB with sole oAB. No difference was demonstrated between the two treatment alternatives in terms of SSI (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.34 to 2.21; 960 participants from 3 studies; very low-certainty evidence), anastomotic leakage (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.21 to 3.45; 960 participants from 3 studies; low-certainty evidence), mortality (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.30 to 3.50; 709 participants from 2 studies; low-certainty evidence), incidence of postoperative ileus (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.68 to 2.33; 709 participants from 2 studies; low-certainty evidence) or length of hospital stay (MD 0.1 respectively 0.2, 95% CI -0.68 to 1.08; data from 2 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). One trial (396 participants) compared MBP+oAB versus nBP. The evidence is uncertain about the effect of MBP+oAB on the incidence of SSI as well as mortality (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.23 respectively RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.01 to 4.22; low-certainty evidence), while no effect on the risk of anastomotic leakages (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.33 to 2.42; low-certainty evidence), the incidence of postoperative ileus (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.81; low-certainty evidence) or the length of hospital stay (MD 0.1, 95% CI -0.8 to 1; low-certainty evidence) could be demonstrated. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on moderate-certainty evidence, our results suggest that MBP+oAB is probably more effective than MBP alone in preventing postoperative complications. In particular, with respect to our primary outcomes, SSI and anastomotic leakage, a lower incidence was demonstrated using MBP+oAB. Whether oAB alone is actually equivalent to MBP+oAB, or leads to a reduction or increase in the risk of postoperative complications, cannot be clarified in light of the low- to very low-certainty evidence. Similarly, it remains unclear whether omitting preoperative bowel preparation leads to an increase in the risk of postoperative complications due to limited evidence. Additional RCTs, particularly on the comparisons of MBP+oAB versus oAB alone or nBP, are needed to assess the impact of oAB alone or nBP compared with MBP+oAB on postoperative complications and to improve confidence in the estimated effect. In addition, RCTs focusing on subgroups (e.g. in relation to type and location of colon resections) or reporting side effects of the intervention are needed to determine the most effective approach of preoperative bowel preparation.

Effect of neuromuscular reversal with neostigmine/glycopyrrolate versus sugammadex on postoperative ileus following colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative ileus (POI) is a common complication following colorectal surgery and is mediated in part by the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway (CAIP). Neostigmine (acetylcholinesterase inhibitor), co-administered with glycopyrrolate, is frequently given for neuromuscular reversal before tracheal extubation and modulates the CAIP. An alternative reversal agent, sugammadex (selective rocuronium or vecuronium binder), acts independently from the CAIP. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of neuromuscular reversal agents used during anaesthesia on gastrointestinal recovery. METHODS: Three hundred thirty-five patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery at the Royal Adelaide Hospital between January 2019 and December 2021 were retrospectively included. The primary outcome was GI-2, a validated composite measure of time to diet tolerance and passage of stool. Demographics, 30-day complications and length of stay were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-four (66.9%) patients (129 [57.6%] males and 95 [42.4%] females, median age 64 [19-90] years) received neostigmine/glycopyrrolate and 111 (33.1%) received sugammadex (62 [55.9%] males and 49 [44.1%] females, median age 67 [18-94] years). Sugammadex patients achieved GI-2 sooner after surgery (median 3 (0-10) vs. 3 (0-12) days, p = 0.036), and reduced time to first stool (median 2 (0-10) vs. 3 (0-12) days, p = 0.035). Rates of POI, complications and length of stay were similar. On univariate analysis, POI was associated with smoking history, previous abdominal surgery, colostomy formation, increased opioid use and postoperative hypokalaemia (p < 0.05). POI was associated with increased complications, including anastomotic leak and prolonged hospital stay (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, neostigmine, bowel anastomoses and increased postoperative opioid use (p < 0.05) remained predictive of time to GI-2. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received sugammadex had a reduced time to achieving first stool and GI-2. Neostigmine use, bowel anastomoses and postoperative opioid use were associated with delayed time to achieving GI-2.

The efficacy and results of medical treatment in postoperative ileus.

Background: Postoperative paralytic ileus refers to the disruption of the normal coordinated propulsive motor activity of the gastrointestinal system following surgery. Surgery causes inflammation in the muscle walls of organs with an intestinal lumen that, in turn, leads to a decrease in intestinal motility. Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of gastrografin, neostigmine, and their combined administration in patients diagnosed with paralytic ileus in the postoperative period. Patients and Methods: One-hundred twelve patients were included from January 2017 and November 2019. The retrospective study is involving prolonged postoperative ileus cases following colorectal surgery. The effect of gastrografin, neostigmine, and gastrografin neostigmine combination was compared retrospectively in the treatment of prolonged ileus after surgery. Results: The study covered 112 patients. Gastrografin was administered to 63 patients; neostigmine was administered to 29, while 20 patients received the combination of the two. Data pertaining to the comparison of the two groups revealed that patients in the gastrografin group were discharged earlier than those in the neostigmine group. Further, patients in the combined group had earlier gas and/or stool discharge and were also discharged from the hospital earlier than those in the neostigmine group. Conclusion: Gastrografin and combined use of gastrografin and neostigmine are effective and viable methods for postoperative ileus cases. Gastrografin can safely be used in patients with anastomoses.

Effect of prucalopride to improve time to gut function recovery following elective colorectal surgery: randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Delayed return to gut function and prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) delay recovery after colorectal surgery. Prucalopride is a selective serotonin-4-receptor agonist that may improve gut motility. METHODS: This was a multicentre, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled randomized trial of 2 mg prucalopride versus placebo in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease and planned ileostomy formation were excluded, but colostomy formation was allowed. The study medication was given 2 h before surgery and daily for up to 6 days after operation. The aim was to determine whether prucalopride improved return of gut function and reduced the incidence of PPOI. The primary endpoint was time to passage of stool and tolerance of diet (GI-2). Participants were allocated in a 1 : 1 ratio, in blocks of 10. Randomization was computer-generated. All study personnel, medical staff, and patients were blinded. RESULTS: This study was completed between October 2017 and May 2020 at two tertiary hospitals in New Zealand. A total of 148 patients were randomized, 74 per arm. Demographic data were similar in the two groups. There was no difference in median time to GI-2 between prucalopride and placebo groups: 3.5 (i.q.r. 2-5) versus 4 (3-5) days respectively (P = 0.124). Prucalopride improved the median time to passage of stool (3 versus 4 days; P = 0.027) but not time to tolerance of diet (2 versus 2 days; P = 0.669) or median duration of hospital stay (4 versus 4 days; P = 0.929). In patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery (125, 84.5 per cent), prucalopride improved median time to GI-2: 3 (2-4) days versus 4 (3-5) days for placebo (P = 0.012). The rate of PPOI, complications, and adverse events was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Prucalopride did not improve time to overall recovery of gut function after elective colorectal surgery. Registration number: NCT02947269 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Ileus in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A retrospective, pharmacovigilance study using Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database.

OBJECTIVE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been widely used in cancer treatment; however, some case reports suggested that ICIs treatment might result in ileus. This study aims to comprehensively reveal the relationship between ileus and ICIs treatment in real-world cases from Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). METHODS: Reports from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2020 were extracted from the FAERS. ICIs-related adverse events in patients were defined as related to use of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibodies (PD-1, nivolumab and pembrolizumab), anti-programmed cell death-ligand 1 inhibitors (PD-L1, atezolizumab, durvalumab, avelumab, and cemiplimab), and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4, ipilimumab and tremelimumab). ICIs-related ileus cases were identified to characterize their clinical features. Reporting odds ratios (ROR) and information component (IC) were used to assess the relationship between ICIs and ileus. RESULTS: Among the 105 001 cases related to ICIs, 245 were reported with ICI-related ileus. The affected patients were mainly elderly (median age, 64.5 years) and male (58%, n = 143). The median onset for all cases was 36 (range 0-880) days, and no statistical difference was observed between monotherapy and combination therapy (PD-1 or PD-L1 plus CTLA-4) (p = 0.21). Most patients required drug withdrawal treatment (n = 113, 74%) and can achieve a recovered-resolved state (n = 72, 46%). All ICIs were significantly associated with ileus (ROR = 4.27, 95%Cl: 3.75-4.85; IC = 2.04, 95%Cl: 1.79-2.31). Ileus events were most commonly reported in PD-1 treatment (n = 164, ROR = 3.83, 95%Cl: 3.28-4.48; IC = 1.90, 95%Cl: 1.62-2.21). CONCLUSION: This pharmacovigilance database analysis suggested that ICIs are related to ileus. However, combination therapy may not speed up the onset of ileus.

A comparison of naloxegol versus alvimopan at the time of cystectomy and urinary diversion.

INTRODUCTION: The use of alvimopan at the time of cystectomy has been associated with improved perioperative outcomes. Naloxegol is a less costly alternative that has been used in some centers. This study aims to compare the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing cystectomy with urinary diversion who receive the mu-opioid antagonist alvimopan versus naloxegol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective review that included all patients who underwent cystectomy with urinary diversion at our institution between 2007-2020. Comparisons were made between patients who received perioperative alvimopan, naloxegol and no mu-opioid antagonist (controls). RESULTS: In 715 patients who underwent cystectomy, 335 received a perioperative mu-opioid antagonist, of whom 57 received naloxegol. Control patients, compared to naloxegol and alvimopan patients, experienced a significantly (p < 0.05) delayed return of bowel function (4.3 vs. 2.5 vs. 3.0 days) and longer hospital length of stay (7.9 vs. 7.5 vs. 6.5 days), respectively. The incidence of nasogastric tube use (14.2% vs. 12.5% vs. 6.5%) and postoperative ileus (21.6% vs. 21.1% vs. 13.3%) was also most common in the control group compared to the naloxegol and alvimopan cohorts, respectively. A multivariable analysis revealed that when comparing naloxegol and alvimopan, there was no difference in return of bowel function (OR 0.88, p = 0.17), incidence of postoperative ileus (OR 1.60, p = 0.44), or hospital readmission (OR 1.22, p = 0.63). CONCLUSIONS: Naloxegol expedites the return of bowel function to the same degree as alvimopan in cystectomy patients. Given the lower cost of naloxegol, this agent may be a preferable alternative to alvimopan.

Treatment with the 5-Lipoxygenase Antagonist Zileuton Protects Mice from Postoperative Ileus.

INTRODUCTION: Previous work of our group showed that lipoxygenase (LOX) pathways become activated upon surgical manipulation of the bowel wall and revealed a beneficial immune modulating role of the LOX-derived anti-inflammatory mediator protectin DX in postoperative ileus (POI). While we found a particular role of 12/15-LOX in the anti-inflammatory LOX action during POI, the role of 5-LOX, which produces the pro-inflammatory leukotriene B4 (LTB4), remained unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of 5-LOX within the pathogenesis of POI in a mouse model. METHODS: POI was induced by intestinal manipulation (IM) of the small bowel in C57BL/6, 5-LOX-/-, and CX3CR1GFP/+. Mice were either treated with a vehicle or with the synthetic 5-LOX antagonist zileuton or were left untreated. Cellular localization of 5-LOX and LTB4 release were visualized by immunofluorescence or ELISA, respectively. POI severity was quantified by gastrointestinal transit (GIT) and leukocyte extravasation into the muscularis externa (ME) by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: 5-LOX expression was detected 24 h after IM within infiltrating leukocytes in the ME. LTB4 levels increased during POI in wild type but not in 5-LOX-/- after IM. POI was ameliorated in 5-LOX-/- as shown by decreased leukocyte numbers and normalized GIT. Zileuton normalized the postoperative GIT and reduced the numbers of infiltrating leukocytes into the ME. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that 5-LOX and its metabolite LTB4 play a crucial role in POI. Genetic deficiency of 5-LOX and pharmacological antagonism by zileuton protected mice from POI. 5-LOX antagonism might be a promising target for prevention of POI in surgical patients.

PyRICo-Pilot: pyridostigmine to reduce the duration of postoperative ileus after colorectal surgery - a phase II study.

AIM: Postoperative ileus (POI) is a major problem after colorectal surgery. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors such as pyridostigmine increase gastrointestinal (GI) motility through a cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway. The purpose of this phase II pilot study is to determine the safety of oral pyridostigmine after elective colorectal surgery. METHOD: This is a Stage 2b safety study (IDEAL framework). All adult patients undergoing elective colorectal resection or formation or reversal of stoma at the Royal Adelaide Hospital between September 2020 and January 2021 were eligible. The primary outcomes were 30-day postoperative complications, reported adverse events and GI-2 - a validated composite outcome measure of recovery of GI function after surgery, defined as the interval from surgery until first passage of stool and tolerance of a solid intake for 24 h (in whole days) in the absence of vomiting. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were included in the study. The median age was 58 (range 50-82) years and seven (47%) were men. Most participants had an American Society of Anesthesiologists grade ≥2 (53%) and the median body mass index was 27 (24-35) kg/m2 . There were 13 postoperative complications [seven were Clavien-Dindo (CD) 1, five CD 2 and one CD 3]. None appeared directly related to pyridostigmine administration, and none of the patients had any overt symptoms of excessive parasympathetic activity. Median GI-2 was 2 (1-4) days. CONCLUSION: Oral pyridostigmine appears to be safe to use after elective colorectal surgery in a select group of patients. However, considering this is a pilot study with a small sample size, larger controlled studies are needed to confirm this finding and establish efficacy for prevention of POI.

Safety and efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to reduce ileus after colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Ileus is common after elective colorectal surgery, and is associated with increased adverse events and prolonged hospital stay. The aim was to assess the role of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for reducing ileus after surgery. METHODS: A prospective multicentre cohort study was delivered by an international, student- and trainee-led collaborative group. Adult patients undergoing elective colorectal resection between January and April 2018 were included. The primary outcome was time to gastrointestinal recovery, measured using a composite measure of bowel function and tolerance to oral intake. The impact of NSAIDs was explored using Cox regression analyses, including the results of a centre-specific survey of compliance to enhanced recovery principles. Secondary safety outcomes included anastomotic leak rate and acute kidney injury. RESULTS: A total of 4164 patients were included, with a median age of 68 (i.q.r. 57-75) years (54·9 per cent men). Some 1153 (27·7 per cent) received NSAIDs on postoperative days 1-3, of whom 1061 (92·0 per cent) received non-selective cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors. After adjustment for baseline differences, the mean time to gastrointestinal recovery did not differ significantly between patients who received NSAIDs and those who did not (4·6 versus 4·8 days; hazard ratio 1·04, 95 per cent c.i. 0·96 to 1·12; P = 0·360). There were no significant differences in anastomotic leak rate (5·4 versus 4·6 per cent; P = 0·349) or acute kidney injury (14·3 versus 13·8 per cent; P = 0·666) between the groups. Significantly fewer patients receiving NSAIDs required strong opioid analgesia (35·3 versus 56·7 per cent; P < 0·001). CONCLUSION: NSAIDs did not reduce the time for gastrointestinal recovery after colorectal surgery, but they were safe and associated with reduced postoperative opioid requirement.

ANTECEDENTES: El ileo es frecuente tras cirugía colorrectal electiva y se asocia con un incremento de los eventos adversos y de la duración de la estancia hospitalaria. El objetivo fue evaluar el papel de los fármacos antiinflamatorios no esteroideos (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, NSAIDs) para reducir el ileo tras la cirugía. MÉTODOS: Estudio de cohortes prospectivo y multicéntrico efecuado por un grupo colaborativo dirigido por estudiantes y cirujanos en formación. Se incluyeron pacientes adultos sometidos a cirugía colorectal electiva entre enero y abril 2018. El resultado primario fue el tiempo hasta la recuperaciòn gastrointestinal, medido por una variable compuesta de función intestinal y tolerancia a la alimentación oral. El impacto de los NSAIDs se exploró utilizando un análisis de regresión de Cox, que incluía los resultados de una encuesta específica dirigida a los centros sobre la adherencia a los principios de la recuperación intensificada. Los resultados secundarios de seguridad incluyeron la dehiscencia anastomótica y la insuficiencia renal aguda. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 4.164 pacientes con una mediana de edad de 68 años (rango intercuartílico: 57-75; 54,9% varones). Un total de 1.153 (27,7%) pacientes fueron tratados con NSAIDs en los días postoperarorios 1-3, de los cuales 1.061 (92,0%) recibieron inhibidores no selectivos de la ciclooxigenasa. Tras los ajustes por las diferencias basales, el tiempo medio hasta la recuperación gastrointestinal no difería significativamente entre pacientes que recibieron o no recibieron NSAIDs (4,6 versus 4,8 días; cociente de riesgos instantáneos, hazard ratio, HR 1,04, i.c. del 95%: 0,96-1,12, P = 0,360). No hubo diferencias significativas en la tasa de dehiscencias anastomóticas (5,4% versus 4,6%; P = 0,349) o insuficiencia renal aguda (14,3% versus 13,8%; P = 0,666) entre los grupos. Sin embargo, significativamente menos pacientes de los que recibieron NSAIDs precisaron una analgesia intensa con opioides (35,3% versus 56,7%; P < 0,001). CONCLUSIÓN: La administración de NSAIDs no redujo el tiempo hasta la recuperación gastrointestinal tras cirugía colorrectal, pero fueron seguros y se asociaron con una reducción en la necesidad de opioides postoperarorios.

Case report series of a novel application of neostigmine to successfully relieve refractory ileus status post-pediatric orthotopic liver transplantation.

Post-operative ileus is common after abdominal surgeries. Children undergoing liver transplant are at increased risk of ileus for various reasons including multiple abdominal procedures and use of narcotic medications. Ileus can lead to abdominal compartment syndrome and compromise the integrity of the liver graft. In some of these patients, ileus is resistant to standard therapies including stool softeners, bowel stimulants, enemas, and even methylnaltrexone. Neostigmine has been shown in pediatric case series to be efficacious in some children for refractory post-operative ileus. We report three children (9 months, 3 years, and 12 years old) who developed refractory ileus after liver transplant, with one of them developing abdominal compartment syndrome, who were treated successfully with continuous infusions of neostigmine. Clinical responses included passage of flatus and stool and improvement in abdominal distension. All patients tolerated the infusion without serious adverse effects such as bradycardia or bronchospasm. Neostigmine was used safely in our patients and may be safe and efficacious for the treatment of refractory ileus in pediatric patients after liver transplantation. Neostigmine should be considered early in the treatment of these patients.

Treatment of vincristine-induced ileus with metoclopramide: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia is an invasive malignancy which ought to be treated with several cytotoxic medications. Vincristine-based regimen is among the most commonly used regimens for the treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Peripheral neuropathy caused by vincristine provides a limitation in dose administration and can influence the treatment outcome and patient's quality of life. CASE PRESENTATION: Ileus and constipation occurred as a result of autonomic neuropathy in a 58-year-old man who underwent vincristine-based regimen for acute lymphoblastic leukemia treatment. Despite the administration of several laxative agents for constipation, the complication did not improve. So metoclopramide as a prokinetic agent was administered intravenously, and patient bowel movement and defecation started after 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: There is no approved protocol for vincristine-induced autonomic neuropathy treatment; thus, prokinetic agents such as metoclopramide can be considered as an option for ileus treatment after ruling out the possibility of bowel obstruction. Prophylactic stool softeners should be administrated in all patients undergoing chemotherapy with vincristine to prevent gastrointestinal motility disorders.

Contributions of microbiome and mechanical deformation to intestinal bacterial overgrowth and inflammation in a human gut-on-a-chip.

A human gut-on-a-chip microdevice was used to coculture multiple commensal microbes in contact with living human intestinal epithelial cells for more than a week in vitro and to analyze how gut microbiome, inflammatory cells, and peristalsis-associated mechanical deformations independently contribute to intestinal bacterial overgrowth and inflammation. This in vitro model replicated results from past animal and human studies, including demonstration that probiotic and antibiotic therapies can suppress villus injury induced by pathogenic bacteria. By ceasing peristalsis-like motions while maintaining luminal flow, lack of epithelial deformation was shown to trigger bacterial overgrowth similar to that observed in patients with ileus and inflammatory bowel disease. Analysis of intestinal inflammation on-chip revealed that immune cells and lipopolysaccharide endotoxin together stimulate epithelial cells to produce four proinflammatory cytokines (IL-8, IL-6, IL-1ß, and TNF-α) that are necessary and sufficient to induce villus injury and compromise intestinal barrier function. Thus, this human gut-on-a-chip can be used to analyze contributions of microbiome to intestinal pathophysiology and dissect disease mechanisms in a controlled manner that is not possible using existing in vitro systems or animal models.

Daikenchuto accelerates the recovery from prolonged postoperative ileus after open abdominal surgery: a subgroup analysis of three randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: Prolonged postoperative ileus (POI) is a common complication after open abdominal surgery (OAS). Daikenchuto (DKT), a traditional Japanese medicine that peripherally stimulates the neurogenic pathway, is used to treat prolonged POI in Japan. To analyze whether DKT accelerates the recovery from prolonged POI after OAS, we conducted a secondary analysis of three multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: A secondary analysis of the three RCTs supported by the Japanese Foundation for Multidisciplinary Treatment of Cancer (project numbers 39-0902, 40-1001, 42-1002) assessing the effect of DKT on prolonged POI in patients who had undergone OAS for colon, liver, or gastric cancer was performed. The subgroup included 410 patients with no bowel movement (BM) before the first diet, a DKT group (n = 214), and a placebo group (n = 196). Patients received either 5 g DKT or a placebo orally, three times a day. The primary endpoint was defined as the time from the end of surgery to the first bowel movement (FBM). A sensitivity analysis was also performed on the age, body mass index and dosage as subgroup analyses. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was significantly accelerated in the DKT group compared with the placebo group (p = 0.004; hazard ratio 1.337). The median time to the FBM was 113.8 h in the placebo group and 99.1 h in the DKT treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: The subgroup analysis showed that DKT significantly accelerated the recovery from prolonged POI following OAS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000026292.

Is There Still a Place for Lidocaine in the (Postoperative) Management of Colics?

Intravenous lidocaine is widely used to prevent or treat postoperative ileus in horses. Clinical studies that support this approach are flawed and contradicted by others. Also, physical obstruction could be more important in causing postoperative reflux than postoperative ileus in the horse. The antiinflammatory properties of lidocaine and the role of inflammation from intestinal handling in the genesis of postoperative reflux are questionable. Because of cost and questionable efficacy of lidocaine, a well-designed clinical trial is required to support its continued use. However, lidocaine could be given to provide or enhance analgesia in selected cases with postoperative colic.

Constipation, ileus and medication use during clozapine treatment in patients with schizophrenia in Iceland.

Purpose of the article: Clozapine is the only evidence based treatment for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Constipation is a well known side effect of clozapine treatment. The aims of this study are to describe the prevalence of constipation and ileus during clozapine treatment of patients with schizophrenia in Iceland and to assess the concomitant use of medication that can cause constipation, and laxatives used to treat constipation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 188 patients treated with clozapine by searching the electronic health records of Landspitali, the National University Hospital, during the study period 1.1.1998 - 21.11.2014. Cases of constipation and ileus were identified using an electronic search with keywords related to ileus in the patients' electronic health records. Detailed medication use was available for 154 patients that used clozapine for at least one year. RESULTS: Four out of 188 patients were diagnosed with ileus that resulted in admission to hospital. Two of these required a permanent stoma as a consequence of their ileus. Laxatives were prescribed for 24 out of 154 patients (15.4%) while on clozapine. In total 40.9% of the patients either had laxatives prescribed or had constipation documented in the medical records. Apart from clozapine, other medications known to cause constipation were prescribed to 28 out of 154 patients (18.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Constipation is a common problem during clozapine treatment which can progress to full-blown ileus which can be fatal. Clinicians need to monitor signs of constipation during treatment with clozapine and respond to it with lifestyle advice and laxative treatment.

Alvimopan for recovery of bowel function after radical cystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Alvimopan is used in abdominal surgery to reduce postoperative ileus in patients undergoing small bowel resections with primary anastomosis. The role and efficacy of alvimopan in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with urinary diversion is not well understood. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of alvimopan in the context of enhanced recovery pathways compared to enhanced recovery pathways alone for perioperative bowel dysfunction in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. SEARCH METHODS: The terms alvimopan and cystectomy were used to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, and Embase. We also reviewed abstracts from the past four years (2013 to 2016) of the American Urologic Association, Society of Urologic Oncology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology Genitourinary Cancers. SELECTION CRITERIA: We searched for randomized controlled trials that compared alvimopan to placebo. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: This study was based on a published protocol. We performed a comprehensive search of multiple databases including CENTRAL in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Web of Science, Scopus and Biosis, which we last updated on 6 February 2017. We also searched abstract proceedings for major relevant meetings (2013 to 2016), databases of the grey literature, trial registries, citations of relevant reviews and contacted clinical experts and the drug manufacturer.Two independent reviewers screened the literature in two stages (title and abstract, full-text) using Covidence software. Two independent reviewers assessed the risk of bias on a 'per outcome' basis using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias; tool and rated the quality of evidence according to GRADE. Results of the single eligible trial were reported in a 'Summary of findings' table based on an intention-to-treat analysis. MAIN RESULTS: Based on a single trial and moderate-quality evidence, alvimopan reduced the time to reach a composite endpoint of tolerance of solid food and documented bowel movements (hazard ratio (HR) 1.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41 to 2.23). This represents 165 more patients (109 more to 207 more) per 1000 meeting this endpoint within 10 days of surgery. Based on moderate-quality evidence, alvimopan reduced the time to hospital discharge (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.01). This represents 138 more patients (82 more to 198 more) per 1000 being discharged within 10 days of surgery. Also based on moderate-quality evidence, alvimopan was associated with a reduced risk of major adverse events (risk ratio (RR) 0.28, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.44) representing 355 fewer patients (404 fewer to 276 fewer) with major adverse events per 1000. We downgraded this outcome for indirectness as it included adverse events that we did not consider major.In terms of secondary outcomes, alvimopan did not appear to alter the rate of readmission (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.33), change the rate of any cardiovascular event (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.05) or alter the mean narcotic pain medication use (mean difference 0, 95% CI 14.08 fewer to 14.08 more morphine equivalents). The quality of evidence was moderate for all three outcomes. Based on high-quality evidence, alvimopan reduced the rate of nasogastric tube replacement (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.59). We did not find evidence for the drug's impact on rates of parenteral nutrition. All outcomes were short term and limited to a 30-day time horizon.Based on the existence of only one trial, we were unable to perform any subgroup or sensitivity analyses. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing radical cystectomy and urinary diversion, the use of alvimopan administered as part of an enhanced recovery pathway for a limited duration (up to 15 doses for up to seven days) probably reduces the time to tolerance of solid food, time to hospital discharge and rates of major adverse events. Readmission rates, rates of cardiovascular events and narcotic pain requirements are probably similar. The need for reinsertion of nasogastric tubes is reduced. We found no evidence for the impact on rates of parenteral nutrition within 30 postoperative days.

Hesperidin alleviates rat postoperative ileus through anti-inflammation and stimulation of Ca(2+)-dependent myosin phosphorylation.

AIM: Postoperative ileus (POI) is a postoperative dysmotility disorder of gastrointestinal tract, which remains one of the most perplexing problems in medicine. In the present study we investigated the effects of hesperidin, a major flavonoid in sweet oranges and lemons, on POI in rats. METHODS: SD rats were administered hesperidin (5, 20, and 80 mg·kg(-1)·d(-1), ig) for 3 consecutive days. POI operation (gently manipulating the cecum for 1 min) was performed on d 2. The gastrointestinal motility and isolated intestinal contraction were examined 1 d after the operation. Then the myosin phosphorylation and inflammatory responses in cecum tissue were assessed. Smooth muscle cells were isolated from rat small intestine for in vitro experiments. RESULTS: The gastric emptying and intestinal transit were significantly decreased in POI rats, which were reversed by administration of hesperidin. In ileum and cecum preparations of POI rats in vitro, hesperidin (2.5-160 µmol/L) dose-dependently increased the spontaneous contraction amplitudes without affecting the contractile frequency, which was blocked by the myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) inhibitor ML-7 or verapamil, but not by TTX. Furthermore, administration of hesperidin increased the phosphorylation of MLC20 in the cecum tissue of POI rats. Moreover, administration of hesperidin reversed the increased levels of inflammatory cytokines, iNOS and COX-2 in cecum tissue of POI rats. In freshly isolated intestinal smooth muscle cells, hesperidin (5-80 µmol/L) dose-dependently increased the intracellular Ca(2+) concentration as well as the phosphorylation of MLC20, which was abrogated by ML-7 or siRNA that knocked down MLCK. CONCLUSION: Oral administration of hesperidin effectively alleviates rat POI through inhibition of inflammatory responses and stimulation of Ca(2+)-dependent MLC phosphorylation.