Outcomes of Alprostadil As an Adjuvant Therapy with Indirect Angiosomal Revascularization in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia after Failure of Direct Revascularization.

BACKGROUND: This study was carried out to assess the effectiveness of alprostadil (prostaglandin E1) when used as an adjuvant therapy with indirect revascularization in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) after the failure of direct revascularization (DR). METHODS: At our centers, 120 patients suffering from infrainguinal peripheral arterial disease with CLI underwent a failed trial of DR procedure, all revascularization procedures were endovascular. Median follow-up was 2 years and 2.5 years for patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). In the alprostadil group, the mean age was 63.41 ± 12.52; 36 (60%) for males and 24 (40%) for females. Post-endovascular intervention alprostadil was administrated immediately postoperatively by intravenous infusion of 40 µg alprostadil diluted in 100 ml of normal saline, over 2 hr every 12 hr for 6 days. RESULTS: In the alprostadil group, the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of the baseline ankle-brachial index (ABI) was 0.45 ± 0.175, while the mean ± SD of ABI at the end of our study was 0.65 ± 0.216 with a difference from the baseline of 0.2 ± 0.041 (P value = 0.08, <0.05 meaning that it is significant). Our 1-month primary patency rate was 93.3%, while our 3- and 6-month patency rate was 92.9%. In the control group, the mean ± SD of the baseline ABI was 0.68 ± 0.22, while the mean ± SD of ABI at the end of our study was 0.69 ± 0.23 with a difference from the baseline of 0.01 ± 0.01 (P value >0.05 meaning that it is nonsignificant) 1-month patency rate was 89%, while 3- and 6-month patency rate was 75%. When we compared the patient's leg vessels before and after our intervention, we found that the percentage of the no-runoff-vessels group decreased from 10 (16.7%) to 4 (6.67%). One-runoff-vessel group percentage dropped from 40 (66.7%) to 36 (60%), whereas, in the two-runoff-vessel group, the percentage increased from 10 (16.7%) to 20 (33.3%). We evaluate leg arteries; we do no pedal arch intervention in the alpostradil group. Out of the total of 60 patients, limb salvage occurred in 58 (96.7%) patients, and 2 (3.3%) patients underwent below-the-knee amputation before the study ended. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show the efficacy and safety of alprostadil as an adjuvant therapy with indirect angiosomal revascularization in patients with tissue loss due to CLI.

Congenital Eyelid Imbrication and Floppy Eyelid Syndromes Complicated by Eversion due to Prostaglandin E Infusion in a Patient With Trisomy 21 and Tetralogy of Fallot.

Congenital eyelid imbrication syndrome is a rare eyelid finding where a long upper lid overlaps the lower lid when the eyes are closed. To date, congenital eyelid imbrication syndrome has been described in the literature less than 10 times. We present a case of congenital eyelid imbrication syndrome in a patient with trisomy 21 and tetralogy of Fallot on a prostaglandin E infusion to maintain a patent ductus arteriosus prior to definitive heart surgery. While on the infusion, the patient developed peripheral edema and flushing due to vasodilation. This coincided with eyelid swelling, conjunctival chemosis, and eversion of the eyelids. Upon cessation of the prostaglandin E1 infusion, his eyelid eversion resolved.

Long Term Effectiveness and Safety of Intracavernosal Botulinum Toxin A as an Add-on Therapy to Phosphosdiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors or Prostaglandin E1 Injections for Erectile Dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Some evidence suggests that intracavernosal botulinum toxin A (BTX-A IC) injections administered in addition to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) or prostaglandin E1 intracavernosal injections (PGE1 ICI) could effectively treat erectile dysfunction (ED) in non-responders, or insufficient responders to these pharmacologic treatments. AIM: To determine the long-term effectiveness and safety of combined treatment involving a single injection of BTX-A IC as an add on therapy to PDE5-Is or PGE1-ICI for the treatment of ED of different etiologies. METHODS: A retrospective, uncontrolled, single center study was conducted. Data from 123 consecutive patients with ED who were insufficient responders to PDE5-Is or PGE1-ICI and who received onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U, abobotulinumtoxinA 250 U or 500 U IC as an add on to their current pharmacologic treatment were analyzed. All analyses were exploratory. Qualitative data were compared using the Fisher's exact test. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed using logistic regression with Odds Ratios (OR). Only variables with P < .05 in the univariate analysis were selected for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The minimally clinically important difference (relative to baseline severity of ED) in the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile function domain (IIEF-EF) score was achieved in 50% of patients at 34 (27-42) days and in 41% at 5.9 (3.9 - 8.1) months following BTX-A IC in combination with PDE5-Is or PGE1 ICI. The severity of ED influenced response to BTX-A IC according to the multivariate analysis (OR = 0.3, IC(95%]) = (0.16 - 0.56). Neither being post prostatectomy nor the type of BTX-A affected the response. Effectiveness tended to decrease more over time with abobotulinumtoxinA 250 U than 500 U. The only side-effects were mild penile pain on injection (n = 1) and mild penile pain for 3 days following injection (n = 1); no systemic effects were reported. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: BTX-A IC (all types) administered as an add on to registered pharmacologic treatments improved erectile function for at least 6 months in 41% of patients with ED of varying etiologies, and was safe. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: A relatively large cohort of patients with ED was included, with a long follow-up period, however the study was retrospective, and uncontrolled. CONCLUSION: This study provides preliminary evidence that BTX-A IC administered as an add-on therapy for ED that is insufficiently responsive to standard therapy is effective for at least 6 months, and is safe. Randomized clinical trials are now needed to fully confirm these results. Giuliano F, Joussain C, Denys P, Long Term Effectiveness and Safety of Intracavernosal Botulinum Toxin A as an Add-on Therapy to Phosphosdiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors or Prostaglandin E1 Injections for Erectile Dysfunction. J Sex Med 2022;19:83-89.

Effects of human Muse cells on bladder inflammation, overactivity, and nociception in a chemically induced Hunner-type interstitial cystitis-like rat model.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We investigated the effects of locally administered human multilineage-differentiating stress enduring (Muse) cells, nontumorigenic pluripotent-like endogenous stem cells, on bladder tissues, function, and nociceptive behavior in a chemically induced Hunner-type interstitial cystitis (HIC)-like rat model without immunosuppressant. METHODS: Chemical cystitis was induced by intravesical instillation of 0.2 N hydrochloride (HCl) for 15 min in female F344 rats. SSEA-3+ Muse cells, SSEA-3- non-Muse cells or Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS; vehicle) were injected into the anterior and posterior bladder wall at each 1×104 cells/10 µl 6 h after HCl application. The sham group received HBSS without HCl instillation. Urinary frequency was assessed using metabolic cages, cystometrograms, nociceptive behavior, and histological analysis of the bladder and L6 spinal cord. RESULTS: Increases in urinary frequency and decreases in bladder capacity compared with the sham group were observed in the vehicle and non-Muse groups, but not in the Muse group, at 1 week. Significant increases in nociceptive behavior compared with the sham group and the expression of TNFα in the bladder and c-Fos in the bilateral dorsal horns of L6 spinal cord were also observed in the vehicle and non-Muse groups, whereas these changes were not seen in the Muse group at 1 week. Histological analysis exhibited a higher proportion of injected Muse cells remaining in the urothelial basal layer and lamina propria of the bladder than non-Muse cells until 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Muse cell therapy could be a promising modality for treating HIC.

Low-dose prostaglandin E1 is safe and effective for critical congenital heart disease: is it time to revisit the dosing guidelines?

INTRODUCTION: Prostaglandin E1 is used to maintain ductal patency in critical congenital heart disease (CHD). The standard starting dose of prostaglandin E1 is 0.05 µg/kg/minute. Lower doses are frequently used, but the efficacy and safety of a low-dose regimen of prostaglandin E1 has not been established. METHODS: We investigated neonates with critical CHD who were started on prostaglandin E1 at 0.01 µg/kg/minute. We reviewed 154 consecutive patients who were separated into three anatomical groups: obstruction to systemic circulation, obstruction to pulmonary circulation, and inadequate mixing (d-transposition of the great arteries). Treatment failure rates and two commonly reported side effects, respiratory depression and seizure, were studied. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients (17%) required a dose increase in prostaglandin E1. Patients with pulmonary obstruction were more likely to require higher doses than patients with systemic obstruction (15/49, 31% versus 9/88, 10%, p = 0.003). Twenty-eight per cent of patients developed respiratory depression and 8% of patients needed mechanical ventilation. Prematurity (<37 week gestation) was the primary risk factor for respiratory depression. No patient required dose escalation or tracheal intubation while on transport. No patient had a seizure attributed to prostaglandin E1. CONCLUSIONS: Prostaglandin E1 at an initial and maintenance dose of 0.01 µg/kg/minute was sufficient to maintain ductal patency in 83% of our cohort. The incidence of respiratory depression requiring mechanical ventilation was low and was mostly seen in premature infants. Starting low-dose prostaglandin E1 at 0.01 µg/kg/minute is a safe and effective therapy for critical CHD.

Use of intravenous alprostadil in patients with severe critical ischemia of the lower limbs.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the indications for the use, potential benefits, and adverse reactions of alprostadil in a group of Colombian patients. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in patients diagnosed with critical limb ischemia who received alprostadil in five hospitals in Colombia between September 2011 and July 2017. We reviewed the clinical records of each patient to obtain the sociodemographic and pharmacological variables, clinical stages, complications, comorbidities, reported effectiveness and adverse reactions. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients treated with alprostadil were evaluated; 50.8% of patients were men, and the average age of 72.5 ± 10.7 years. A total of 86.9% of patients were hypertensive, and 65.6% were diabetic. A total of 77.0% presented ulceration, and this condition was considered as a diabetic foot in 57.4% of patients. A total of 81.9% of patients were classified as Fontaine stage 4; 60.7% received therapy as initially indicated, with an average of 19 days of alprostadil use. Regarding the therapy results, 58.0% of the patients with ulcers or trophic lesions showed improvement, 86.2% showed improvement of pain, and the limb was saved in 72.1% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Critical limb ischemia was presented by patients with advanced age and high cardiovascular risk who were treated during severe and advanced stages where therapeutic options are limited. Treatment with alprostadil achieved satisfactory results with improvement in ulcers, pain, and limb salvage rates in this series of patients.

Efficacy of alprostadil in preventing contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The role of alprostadil on the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) still remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of short-term alprostadil on the incidence of CIN in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: A total of 480 patients with coronary heart disease undergoing PCI were enrolled in our study and randomly assigned to two groups. The control group (n = 240) was given only hydration therapy and the alprostadil group (n = 240) received intravenous administration of 20 ug/day (diluted with 100 ml normal saline) from 0.5∼1 hr before to 3 days after operation on the basis of hydration. The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of CIN, which was defined as an increase in SCr concentration ≥ 44.2 umol/l or ≥25% above baseline within 48 hr∼72 hr after exposure of contrast media. RESULTS: The incidence of CIN was significantly lower in the alprostadil group than that in the control group (6.25% vs 11.67%, P = 0.038). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that alprostadil was the protective factor of CIN (OR = 0.699, 95% CI 0.542-0.902, P = 0.006). The benefits against CIN were consistent in prespecified high-risk patients with diabetes mellitus (P = 0.003). In addition, we also found that hs-CRP and blood homocysteine values after PCI were significantly lower in the alprostadil group than those in the control group. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic administration of alprostadil may prevent against CIN in coronary heart disease patients undergoing elective PCI, particularly in high-risk patients with diabetes mellitus.

Prostaglandin E1 for maintaining ductal patency in neonates with ductal-dependent cardiac lesions.

BACKGROUND: Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) is used to keep the ductus arteriosus patent and can be life-saving in neonates with ductal-dependent cardiac lesions. PGE1 is used to promote mixing of pulmonary and systemic blood flow or improve pulmonary or systemic circulations, prior to balloon atrial septostomy or surgery. PGE1 therapy may cause several short-term and long-term adverse effects. The efficacy and safety of PGE1 in neonates with ductal-dependent cardiac lesions has not been systematically reviewed. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety of both short-term (< 120 hours) and long-term (≥120 hours) PGE1 therapy in maintaining patency of the ductus arteriosus and decreasing mortality in ductal-dependent cardiac lesions. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the literature in October 2017, using the search strategy recommended by Cochrane Neonatal. We searched electronic databases (CENTRAL (in the Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase); abstracts of the Pediatric Academic Societies; websites for registered trials at www.clinicaltrials.gov and www.controlled-trials.com; and in the reference list of identified articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized or quasi-randomized trials using PGE1 at any dose or duration to maintain ductal patency in term or late preterm (≥ 34 weeks' gestation) infants with ductal-dependent cardiac lesions and which reported effectiveness and safety in the short term or long term. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We followed the standard Cochrane methods for conducting a systematic review. Two review authors (SA and MP) independently assessed the titles and abstracts of studies identified by the search strategy to determine eligibility for inclusion. We obtained the full-text version if eligibility could not be done reliably by title and abstract. We resolved any differences by discussion. We designed electronic forms for trial inclusion/exclusion, data extraction, and for requesting additional published information from authors of the original reports. MAIN RESULTS: Our search did not identify any completed or ongoing trials that met our inclusion criteria. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence from randomized controlled trials to determine the safety and efficacy of PGE1 in neonates with ductal-dependent cardiac lesions. Evidence from observational trials have informed clinical practice on the use of PGE, which is now considered the standard of care for ductal-dependent cardiac lesions. It is unlikely that randomized controlled studies will be performed for this indication but comparative efficacy of newer formulations of PGE1, different doses of PGE1 and studies comparing PGE with PDA stents or other measures to keep the ductus open may be ethical and necessary.

Efficacy and Safety of Alprostadil in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease Fontaine Stage IV: Results of a Placebo Controlled Randomised Multicentre Trial (ESPECIAL).

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of alprostadil in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) Fontaine Stage IV. METHODS: This was a multinational, prospective, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, parallel group trial. Patients with Stage IV PAOD were equally randomised to either 4 weeks of alprostadil treatment twice daily or to placebo treatment twice daily. The primary efficacy variables were the rate of complete healing of all necrosis and ulceration 12 weeks after the end of treatment and the frequency of major amputations 24 weeks after the end of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 840 patients were randomised between 2004 and 2013. At baseline, no major differences between treatment groups were found. The rate of "complete healing" was 18.4% in patients on alprostadil and 17.2% in patients on placebo. The rates of "major amputations" were 12.6% in patients on alprostadil and 14.6% in patients on placebo. The adjusted difference between alprostadil and placebo including their 95% confidence intervals was 1.1 (-4.0 to 6.3) for "complete healing" and -2.1 (-6.7 to 2.5) for "major amputations." In the subgroup of diabetic patients the rates of major amputations were numerically lower in the alprostadil than placebo group (10.6% vs. 17.4%). Within the total cohort a non-significant difference in "decrease in ulcer area ≥50%" was reached in 30.2% of patients on alprostadil and in 24.3% of patients on placebo at end of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, superiority of alprostadil over placebo could not be shown. Nevertheless, a slight numerical but not clinically relevant advantage for alprostadil emerged from the "area decrease of ulcers by ≥ 50%," indicating that a healing effect may have started. The results have to be considered in the light of several limitations in study design and conduct.

Chronic Low Dose Prostaglandin and Neonatal Heart Block.

Long-term prostaglandin use is commonly associated with side effects such as cortical proliferation of the bones, hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, and soft tissue swelling of the extremities. We report a neonate with critical coarctation of the aorta, who developed second and third degree atrioventricular blocks associated with prolonged prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) infusion. Interestingly, these conduction blocks only occurred at low PGE1 dose. The rhythm disturbances resolved promptly with the discontinuation of PGE1 following surgical repair.

Long-Term Prostaglandin E1 Infusion for Newborns with Critical Congenital Heart Disease.

Prostaglandin E1 is crucial for keeping the patent ductus arteriosus in critical congenital heart disease for the survival and palliation of particularly prematurely born babies until a cardiosurgical intervention is available. In this study, the side effects of prostaglandin E1 in newborns with critical congenital heart disease and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Thirty-five newborns diagnosed with critical congenital heart disease were treated with prostaglandin E1 between January 2012 and September 2014 at our hospital. Patient charts were examined for prostaglandin E1 side effects (metabolic, gastric outlet obstruction, apnea), clinical status, and prognosis. Acquired data were analyzed in the SPSS 20.0 program. Patients with birth weight under 2500 g needed more days of prostaglandin E1 infusion than ones with birthweight over 2500 g (P = 0.016). The ratio of patients with birth weight under 2500 g who received prostaglandin E1 longer than 7 days was higher than the patients with birth weight over 2500 g (P = 0.02). Eighteen side effects were encountered in 11 of 35 patients (31%). Of these side effects, 1 patient had 4, 4 patients had 2, and 6 patients had only 1 side effect. Discontinuation of the therapy was never needed. Prostaglandin E1 is an accepted therapy modality for survival and outcome in critical congenital heart disease in particularly low-birth-weight babies until a surgical intervention is available. Side effects are not less encountered but are almost always manageable, and discontinuation is not needed.

Cortical hyperostosis as a side-effect of prolonged use of prostaglandins.

Cortical hyperostosis is a very uncommon side-effect of prolonged prostaglandin therapy with distinctive radiological signs that may be accompanied by painful swelling of the limbs and responds rapidly to withdrawal of therapy.

Complications of Long-Term Prostaglandin E1 Use in Newborns With Ductal-Dependent Critical Congenital Heart Disease.

Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) has been used for decades in the medical treatment of ductal dependent critical congenital heart disease in neonates. The article is a report of a retrospective evaluation of the long-term effects of PGE1 in a neonatal intensive care unit in Saudi Arabia. There were 22 subjects with a wide spectrum of cardiac defects maintained on PGE1 for a mean of 38 days (range: 6-200 days). The majority of the complications included hypokalemia, hypotension, and apnea/bradycardia. Pseudo-Barett syndrome and gastric outlet obstruction were also found. While long-term administration of PGE1 is rare in North America, it is important to be aware of possible adverse effects of fluid and electrolyte imbalance, gastric outlet obstruction, and feeding difficulties.

A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of lubiprostone for opioid-induced constipation in chronic noncancer pain.

OBJECTIVES: This multicenter, phase 3 trial evaluated oral lubiprostone for constipation associated with non-methadone opioids in patients with chronic noncancer-related pain. METHODS: Adults with opioid-induced constipation (OIC; <3 spontaneous bowel movements [SBMs] per week) were randomized 1:1 to double-blind lubiprostone 24 µg or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks. The primary end point was the overall SBM response rate. Responders had at least moderate response (≥1 SBM improvement over baseline frequency) in all treatment weeks with available observed data, as well as full response (≥3 SBMs per week) for at least 9 of the 12 treatment weeks. RESULTS: In total, 431 patients were randomized; 212 each received lubiprostone and placebo, and 7 were not treated. Overall, the SBM response rate was significantly higher for patients treated with lubiprostone vs. placebo (27.1 vs. 18.9%, respectively; P=0.030). Overall mean change from baseline in SBM frequency was significantly greater with lubiprostone vs. placebo (3.2 vs. 2.4, respectively; P=0.001). The median time to first SBM was significantly shorter with lubiprostone vs. placebo (23.5 vs. 37.7 h, respectively; P=0.004). Compared with placebo, the patients treated with lubiprostone exhibited significant improvements in straining (P=0.004), stool consistency (P<0.001), and constipation severity (P=0.010). No significant differences were observed in quality-of-life measures or the use of rescue medication; however, the percentage of patients who used rescue medication was consistently lower in the lubiprostone group than in the placebo group at months 1 (34.9 vs. 37.7%), 2 (23.4 vs. 26.6%), and 3 (20.5 vs. 22.0%). Adverse events (AEs) >5% were diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain (lubiprostone: 11.3, 9.9, 4.2, and 7.1%, respectively; placebo, 3.8, 4.7, 5.2, and 0%, respectively). None of the serious AEs (lubiprostone, 3.3%; placebo, 2.8%) were related to lubiprostone. CONCLUSIONS: Lubiprostone significantly improved symptoms of OIC and was well tolerated in patients with chronic noncancer pain.

Unilateral absence of the pulmonary artery: a report of two cases that presented different clinical courses.

We recently diagnosed two cases of isolated unilateral absence of the pulmonary artery just after birth. Through the therapy, we could not prevent obstruction of the pulmonary artery and lead to complications. There have been no symptoms attributed to isolated unilateral absence of the pulmonary artery so far. We should carefully consider the strategy for therapeutic intervention for asymptomatic cases.

Lubiprostone for the treatment of functional constipation in children.

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric functional constipation is common; effective, easily administered treatment options are limited. Lubiprostone is an oral chloride channel protein-2 activator that stimulates gastrointestinal fluid secretion, softens stools, and facilitates bowel movements (BMs). We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of lubiprostone in children and adolescents with functional constipation. METHODS: Patients ≥12 kg, 17 years or younger, and with <3 spontaneous BMs (SBMs; ie, BMs that did not occur within 24 hours of rescue medication use) per week were enrolled at 22 US general pediatric and pediatric gastroenterology centers (January 2007-October 2008). Patients received 4 weeks of open-label lubiprostone at doses of 12 µg once daily (QD), 12 µg twice daily (BID), or 24 µg BID based on age and weight. The primary endpoint was SBM frequency during week 1 versus baseline. RESULTS: Of 127 enrolled patients, 124 were treated and analyzed (12 µg QD, n = 27; 12 µg BID, n = 65; 24 µg BID, n = 32), and 109 completed the study. The mean age of treated patients was 10.2 years (range 3-17 years); 65 were boys. Mean SBM frequency significantly increased compared with baseline at week 1 (3.1 vs. 1.5 SBMs/week, P < 0.0001). SBM frequency was improved significantly from baseline overall (P < 0.0001) and for individual dose groups (P ≤ 0.0062) during weeks 2, 3, and 4. Common (≥5%) adverse events included nausea (18.5%), vomiting (12.1%), diarrhea (8.1%), abdominal pain (7.3%), and headache (5.6%). Two patients experienced serious adverse events (unrelated abdominal pain; unrelated sickle cell crisis). CONCLUSIONS: Lubiprostone was efficacious and well tolerated in children and adolescents with functional constipation.

Second-trimester induced abortions in two tertiary centres in Rome.

OBJECTIVE: Demand for second-trimester induced abortions (STIAs) increases in Italy. For these procedures, prostaglandins alone were used until 2010, when mifepristone became available. The present study compares the two modalities, and investigates the reasons for STIAs. METHODS: The records of all such procedures performed at the Department of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Urology of the 'Sapienza' University (Rome), between January 2004 and December 2012, and of all those done at the 'San Filippo' Hospital (Rome), between January 2010 and December 2012, were analysed. Data gathered included women's age, obstetric history, reasons for requesting the STIA, gestational age, mode of intervention, and complications if any. RESULTS: During the study period, 353 women requested a STIA. Karyotype or genetic anomalies were the reason for the request in 187 cases (53%), while structural anomalies, both single and multiple, were given as the reason in 158 (45%). In most cases, these anomalies were assessed by ultrasound scan. CONCLUSION: Few studies have investigated reasons for requesting STIAs. Of all chromosome abnormalities diagnosed in this study, trisomy 21 was the most common (59%) and it was the most frequent reason for requesting pregnancy termination.

A case of uterine rupture in mid-trimester spontaneous abortion: a complication of gemeprost vaginal administration.

The only prostaglandin analogue licensed in Italy for induction of labour in spontaneous and therapeutic abortion is gemeprost. The authors report a case of spontaneous uterine rupture of a scarred uterus, for previous caesarean sections, in a woman at 20 weeks of gestation with a diagnosis of spontaneous abortion. She received a pessary of gemeprost every three hours. After the fifth pessary, she complained of severe pain. At the ultrasound examination, uterine cavity appeared empty and the dead fetus was dislocated in the abdomen. Emergency laparotomy was performed and uterine tear was repaired. To induce labour for fetal demise or therapeutic abortion in second trimester in women with scarred uterus, the authors decided to lengthen the time between administrations of pessary from four to five hours depending on patient's symptoms. However the appropriate drug regimen has still to be found and more data are necessary.