Snapshot of the cannabinoid receptor 1-arrestin complex unravels the biased signaling mechanism.

Cannabis activates the cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1), which elicits analgesic and emotion regulation benefits, along with adverse effects, via Gi and ß-arrestin signaling pathways. However, the lack of understanding of the mechanism of ß-arrestin-1 (ßarr1) coupling and signaling bias has hindered drug development targeting CB1. Here, we present the high-resolution cryo-electron microscopy structure of CB1-ßarr1 complex bound to the synthetic cannabinoid MDMB-Fubinaca (FUB), revealing notable differences in the transducer pocket and ligand-binding site compared with the Gi protein complex. ßarr1 occupies a wider transducer pocket promoting substantial outward movement of the TM6 and distinctive twin toggle switch rearrangements, whereas FUB adopts a different pose, inserting more deeply than the Gi-coupled state, suggesting the allosteric correlation between the orthosteric binding pocket and the partner protein site. Taken together, our findings unravel the molecular mechanism of signaling bias toward CB1, facilitating the development of CB1 agonists.

Molecular recognition of morphine and fentanyl by the human µ-opioid receptor.

Morphine and fentanyl are among the most used opioid drugs that confer analgesia and unwanted side effects through both G protein and arrestin signaling pathways of µ-opioid receptor (µOR). Here, we report structures of the human µOR-G protein complexes bound to morphine and fentanyl, which uncover key differences in how they bind the receptor. We also report structures of µOR bound to TRV130, PZM21, and SR17018, which reveal preferential interactions of these agonists with TM3 side of the ligand-binding pocket rather than TM6/7 side. In contrast, morphine and fentanyl form dual interactions with both TM3 and TM6/7 regions. Mutations at the TM6/7 interface abolish arrestin recruitment of µOR promoted by morphine and fentanyl. Ligands designed to reduce TM6/7 interactions display preferential G protein signaling. Our results provide crucial insights into fentanyl recognition and signaling of µOR, which may facilitate rational design of next-generation analgesics.

How GPCR Phosphorylation Patterns Orchestrate Arrestin-Mediated Signaling.

Binding of arrestin to phosphorylated G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) controls many aspects of cell signaling. The number and arrangement of phosphates may vary substantially for a given GPCR, and different phosphorylation patterns trigger different arrestin-mediated effects. Here, we determine how GPCR phosphorylation influences arrestin behavior by using atomic-level simulations and site-directed spectroscopy to reveal the effects of phosphorylation patterns on arrestin binding and conformation. We find that patterns favoring binding differ from those favoring activation-associated conformational change. Both binding and conformation depend more on arrangement of phosphates than on their total number, with phosphorylation at different positions sometimes exerting opposite effects. Phosphorylation patterns selectively favor a wide variety of arrestin conformations, differently affecting arrestin sites implicated in scaffolding distinct signaling proteins. We also reveal molecular mechanisms of these phenomena. Our work reveals the structural basis for the long-standing "barcode" hypothesis and has important implications for design of functionally selective GPCR-targeted drugs.

Crystal Structure of an LSD-Bound Human Serotonin Receptor.

The prototypical hallucinogen LSD acts via serotonin receptors, and here we describe the crystal structure of LSD in complex with the human serotonin receptor 5-HT2B. The complex reveals conformational rearrangements to accommodate LSD, providing a structural explanation for the conformational selectivity of LSD's key diethylamide moiety. LSD dissociates exceptionally slow from both 5-HT2BR and 5-HT2AR-a major target for its psychoactivity. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations suggest that LSD's slow binding kinetics may be due to a "lid" formed by extracellular loop 2 (EL2) at the entrance to the binding pocket. A mutation predicted to increase the mobility of this lid greatly accelerates LSD's binding kinetics and selectively dampens LSD-mediated ß-arrestin2 recruitment. This study thus reveals an unexpected binding mode of LSD; illuminates key features of its kinetics, stereochemistry, and signaling; and provides a molecular explanation for LSD's actions at human serotonin receptors. PAPERCLIP.

Conserved class B GPCR activation by a biased intracellular agonist.

Class B G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), including glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP1R) and parathyroid hormone 1 receptor (PTH1R), are important drug targets1-5. Injectable peptide drugs targeting these receptors have been developed, but orally available small-molecule drugs remain under development6,7. Here we report the high-resolution structure of human PTH1R in complex with the stimulatory G protein (Gs) and a small-molecule agonist, PCO371, which reveals an unexpected binding mode of PCO371 at the cytoplasmic interface of PTH1R with Gs. The PCO371-binding site is totally different from all binding sites previously reported for small molecules or peptide ligands in GPCRs. The residues that make up the PCO371-binding pocket are conserved in class B GPCRs, and a single alteration in PTH2R and two residue alterations in GLP1R convert these receptors to respond to PCO371. Functional assays reveal that PCO371 is a G-protein-biased agonist that is defective in promoting PTH1R-mediated arrestin signalling. Together, these results uncover a distinct binding site for designing small-molecule agonists for PTH1R and possibly other members of the class B GPCRs and define a receptor conformation that is specific only for G-protein activation but not arrestin signalling. These insights should facilitate the design of distinct types of class B GPCR small-molecule agonist for various therapeutic indications.

Visualizing neuromodulation in vivo: TANGO-mapping of dopamine signaling reveals appetite control of sugar sensing.

Behavior cannot be predicted from a "connectome" because the brain contains a chemical "map" of neuromodulation superimposed upon its synaptic connectivity map. Neuromodulation changes how neural circuits process information in different states, such as hunger or arousal. Here we describe a genetically based method to map, in an unbiased and brain-wide manner, sites of neuromodulation under different conditions in the Drosophila brain. This method, and genetic perturbations, reveal that the well-known effect of hunger to enhance behavioral sensitivity to sugar is mediated, at least in part, by the release of dopamine onto primary gustatory sensory neurons, which enhances sugar-evoked calcium influx. These data reinforce the concept that sensory neurons constitute an important locus for state-dependent gain control of behavior and introduce a methodology that can be extended to other neuromodulators and model organisms.

Identification of a ß-arrestin-biased negative allosteric modulator for the ß2-adrenergic receptor.

Catecholamine-stimulated ß2-adrenergic receptor (ß2AR) signaling via the canonical Gs-adenylyl cyclase-cAMP-PKA pathway regulates numerous physiological functions, including the therapeutic effects of exogenous ß-agonists in the treatment of airway disease. ß2AR signaling is tightly regulated by GRKs and ß-arrestins, which together promote ß2AR desensitization and internalization as well as downstream signaling, often antithetical to the canonical pathway. Thus, the ability to bias ß2AR signaling toward the Gs pathway while avoiding ß-arrestin-mediated effects may provide a strategy to improve the functional consequences of ß2AR activation. Since attempts to develop Gs-biased agonists and allosteric modulators for the ß2AR have been largely unsuccessful, here we screened small molecule libraries for allosteric modulators that selectively inhibit ß-arrestin recruitment to the receptor. This screen identified several compounds that met this profile, and, of these, a difluorophenyl quinazoline (DFPQ) derivative was found to be a selective negative allosteric modulator of ß-arrestin recruitment to the ß2AR while having no effect on ß2AR coupling to Gs. DFPQ effectively inhibits agonist-promoted phosphorylation and internalization of the ß2AR and protects against the functional desensitization of ß-agonist mediated regulation in cell and tissue models. The effects of DFPQ were also specific to the ß2AR with minimal effects on the ß1AR. Modeling, mutagenesis, and medicinal chemistry studies support DFPQ derivatives binding to an intracellular membrane-facing region of the ß2AR, including residues within transmembrane domains 3 and 4 and intracellular loop 2. DFPQ thus represents a class of biased allosteric modulators that targets an allosteric site of the ß2AR.

Serodolin, a ß-arrestin-biased ligand of 5-HT7 receptor, attenuates pain-related behaviors.

G protein­coupled receptors (GPCRs) are involved in regulation of manifold physiological processes through coupling to heterotrimeric G proteins upon ligand stimulation. Classical therapeutically active drugs simultaneously initiate several downstream signaling pathways, whereas biased ligands, which stabilize subsets of receptor conformations, elicit more selective signaling. This concept of functional selectivity of a ligand has emerged as an interesting property for the development of new therapeutic molecules. Biased ligands are expected to have superior efficacy and/or reduced side effects by regulating biological functions of GPCRs in a more precise way. In the last decade, 5-HT7 receptor (5-HT7R) has become a promising target for the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders, sleep and circadian rhythm disorders, and pathological pain. In this study, we showed that Serodolin is unique among a number of agonists and antagonists tested: it behaves as an antagonist/inverse agonist on Gs signaling while inducing ERK activation through a ß-arrestin­dependent signaling mechanism that requires c-SRC activation. Moreover, we showed that Serodolin clearly decreases hyperalgesia and pain sensation in response to inflammatory, thermal, and mechanical stimulation. This antinociceptive effect could not be observed in 5-HT7R knockout (KO) mice and was fully blocked by administration of SB269-970, a specific 5-HT7R antagonist, demonstrating the specificity of action of Serodolin. Physiological effects of 5-HT7R stimulation have been classically shown to result from Gs-dependent adenylyl cyclase activation. In this study, using a ß-arrestin­biased agonist, we provided insight into the molecular mechanism triggered by 5-HT7R and revealed its therapeutic potential in the modulation of pain response.

Arrestin-mediated desensitization enables intraneuronal olfactory discrimination in Caenorhabditis elegans.

In the mammalian olfactory system, cross-talk between olfactory signals is minimized through physical isolation: individual neurons express one or few olfactory receptors among those encoded in the genome. Physical isolation allows for segregation of stimuli during signal transduction; however, in the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans, ∼1,300 olfactory receptors are primarily expressed in only 32 neurons, precluding this strategy. Here, we report genetic and behavioral evidence that ß-arrestin-mediated desensitization of olfactory receptors, working downstream of the kinase GRK-1, enables discrimination between intraneuronal olfactory stimuli. Our findings suggest that C. elegans exploits ß-arrestin desensitization to maximize responsiveness to novel odors, allowing for behaviorally appropriate responses to olfactory stimuli despite the large number of olfactory receptors signaling in single cells. This represents a fundamentally different solution to the problem of olfactory discrimination than that which evolved in mammals, allowing for economical use of a limited number of sensory neurons.

Interaction of ARRDC4 With GLUT1 Mediates Metabolic Stress in the Ischemic Heart.

BACKGROUND: An ancient family of arrestin-fold proteins, termed alpha-arrestins, may have conserved roles in regulating nutrient transporter trafficking and cellular metabolism as adaptor proteins. One alpha-arrestin, TXNIP (thioredoxin-interacting protein), is known to regulate myocardial glucose uptake. However, the in vivo role of the related alpha-arrestin, ARRDC4 (arrestin domain-containing protein 4), is unknown. METHODS: We first tested whether interaction with GLUTs (glucose transporters) is a conserved function of the mammalian alpha-arrestins. To define the in vivo function of ARRDC4, we generated and characterized a novel Arrdc4 knockout (KO) mouse model. We then analyzed the molecular interaction between arrestin domains and the basal GLUT1. RESULTS: ARRDC4 binds to GLUT1, induces its endocytosis, and blocks cellular glucose uptake in cardiomyocytes. Despite the closely shared protein structure, ARRDC4 and its homologue TXNIP operate by distinct molecular pathways. Unlike TXNIP, ARRDC4 does not increase oxidative stress. Instead, ARRDC4 uniquely mediates cardiomyocyte death through its effects on glucose deprivation and endoplasmic reticulum stress. At baseline, Arrdc4-KO mice have mild fasting hypoglycemia. Arrdc4-KO hearts exhibit a robust increase in myocardial glucose uptake and glycogen storage. Accordingly, deletion of Arrdc4 improves energy homeostasis during ischemia and protects cardiomyocytes against myocardial infarction. Furthermore, structure-function analyses of the interaction of ARRDC4 with GLUT1 using both scanning mutagenesis and deep-learning Artificial Intelligence identify specific residues in the C-terminal arrestin-fold domain as the interaction interface that regulates GLUT1 function, revealing a new molecular target for potential therapeutic intervention against myocardial ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: These results uncover a new mechanism of ischemic injury in which ARRDC4 drives glucose deprivation-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress leading to cardiomyocyte death. Our findings establish ARRDC4 as a new scaffold protein for GLUT1 that regulates cardiac metabolism in response to ischemia and provide insight into the therapeutic strategy for ischemic heart disease.

Cryo-EM structure of human rhodopsin bound to an inhibitory G protein.

G-protein-coupled receptors comprise the largest family of mammalian transmembrane receptors. They mediate numerous cellular pathways by coupling with downstream signalling transducers, including the hetrotrimeric G proteins Gs (stimulatory) and Gi (inhibitory) and several arrestin proteins. The structural mechanisms that define how G-protein-coupled receptors selectively couple to a specific type of G protein or arrestin remain unknown. Here, using cryo-electron microscopy, we show that the major interactions between activated rhodopsin and Gi are mediated by the C-terminal helix of the Gi α-subunit, which is wedged into the cytoplasmic cavity of the transmembrane helix bundle and directly contacts the amino terminus of helix 8 of rhodopsin. Structural comparisons of inactive, Gi-bound and arrestin-bound forms of rhodopsin with inactive and Gs-bound forms of the ß2-adrenergic receptor provide a foundation to understand the unique structural signatures that are associated with the recognition of Gs, Gi and arrestin by activated G-protein-coupled receptors.

High-mass MALDI-MS unravels ligand-mediated G protein-coupling selectivity to GPCRs.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are important pharmaceutical targets for the treatment of a broad spectrum of diseases. Although there are structures of GPCRs in their active conformation with bound ligands and G proteins, the detailed molecular interplay between the receptors and their signaling partners remains challenging to decipher. To address this, we developed a high-sensitivity, high-throughput matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) method to interrogate the first stage of signal transduction. GPCR-G protein complex formation is detected as a proxy for the effect of ligands on GPCR conformation and on coupling selectivity. Over 70 ligand-GPCR-partner protein combinations were studied using as little as 1.25 pmol protein per sample. We determined the selectivity profile and binding affinities of three GPCRs (rhodopsin, beta-1 adrenergic receptor [ß1AR], and angiotensin II type 1 receptor) to engineered Gα-proteins (mGs, mGo, mGi, and mGq) and nanobody 80 (Nb80). We found that GPCRs in the absence of ligand can bind mGo, and that the role of the G protein C terminus in GPCR recognition is receptor-specific. We exemplified our quantification method using ß1AR and demonstrated the allosteric effect of Nb80 binding in assisting displacement of nadolol to isoprenaline. We also quantified complex formation with wild-type heterotrimeric Gαißγ and ß-arrestin-1 and showed that carvedilol induces an increase in coupling of ß-arrestin-1 and Gαißγ to ß1AR. A normalization strategy allows us to quantitatively measure the binding affinities of GPCRs to partner proteins. We anticipate that this methodology will find broad use in screening and characterization of GPCR-targeting drugs.

Histamine H1 Receptor-Mediated JNK Phosphorylation Is Regulated by Gq Protein-Dependent but Arrestin-Independent Pathways.

Arrestins are known to be involved not only in the desensitization and internalization of G protein-coupled receptors but also in the G protein-independent activation of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases, such as extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), to regulate cell proliferation and inflammation. Our previous study revealed that the histamine H1 receptor-mediated activation of ERK is dually regulated by Gq proteins and arrestins. In this study, we investigated the roles of Gq proteins and arrestins in the H1 receptor-mediated activation of JNK in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing wild-type (WT) human H1 receptors, the Gq protein-biased mutant S487TR, and the arrestin-biased mutant S487A. In these mutants, the Ser487 residue in the C-terminus region of the WT was truncated (S487TR) or mutated to alanine (S487A). Histamine significantly stimulated JNK phosphorylation in CHO cells expressing WT and S487TR but not S487A. Histamine-induced JNK phosphorylation in CHO cells expressing WT and S487TR was suppressed by inhibitors against H1 receptors (ketotifen and diphenhydramine), Gq proteins (YM-254890), and protein kinase C (PKC) (GF109203X) as well as an intracellular Ca2+ chelator (BAPTA-AM) but not by inhibitors against G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRK2/3) (cmpd101), ß-arrestin2 (ß-arrestin2 siRNA), and clathrin (hypertonic sucrose). These results suggest that the H1 receptor-mediated phosphorylation of JNK is regulated by Gq-protein/Ca2+/PKC-dependent but GRK/arrestin/clathrin-independent pathways.

Arrestin Facilitates Rhodopsin Dephosphorylation in Vivo.

Deactivation of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) involves multiple phosphorylations followed by arrestin binding, which uncouples the GPCR from G-protein activation. Some GPCRs, such as rhodopsin, are reused many times. Arrestin dissociation and GPCR dephosphorylation are key steps in the recycling process. In vitro evidence suggests that visual arrestin (ARR1) binding to light-activated, phosphorylated rhodopsin hinders dephosphorylation. Whether ARR1 binding also affects rhodopsin dephosphorylation in vivo is not known. We investigated this using both male and female mice lacking ARR1. Mice were exposed to bright light and placed in darkness for different periods of time, and differently phosphorylated species of rhodopsin were assayed by isoelectric focusing. For WT mice, rhodopsin dephosphorylation was nearly complete by 1 h in darkness. Surprisingly, we observed that, in the Arr1 KO rods, rhodopsin remained phosphorylated even after 3 h. Delayed dephosphorylation in Arr1 KO rods cannot be explained by cell stress induced by persistent signaling, since it is not prevented by the removal of transducin, the visual G-protein, nor can it be explained by downregulation of protein phosphatase 2A, the putative rhodopsin phosphatase. We further show that cone arrestin (ARR4), which binds light-activated, phosphorylated rhodopsin poorly, had little effect in enhancing rhodopsin dephosphorylation, whereas mice expressing binding-competent mutant ARR1-3A showed a similar time course of rhodopsin dephosphorylation as WT. Together, these results reveal a novel role of ARR1 in facilitating rhodopsin dephosphorylation in vivoSIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are transmembrane proteins used by cells to receive and respond to a broad range of extracellular signals that include neurotransmitters, hormones, odorants, and light (photons). GPCR signaling is terminated by two sequential steps: phosphorylation and arrestin binding. Both steps must be reversed when GPCRs are recycled and reused. Dephosphorylation, which is required for recycling, is an understudied process. Using rhodopsin as a prototypical GPCR, we discovered that arrestin facilitated rhodopsin dephosphorylation in living mice.

G protein-coupled receptor kinase phosphorylation of distal C-tail sites specifies ßarrestin1-mediated signaling by chemokine receptor CXCR4.

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) kinases (GRKs) and arrestins mediate GPCR desensitization, internalization, and signaling. The spatial pattern of GPCR phosphorylation is predicted to trigger these discrete GRK and arrestin-mediated functions. Here, we provide evidence that distal carboxyl-terminal tail (C-tail), but not proximal, phosphorylation of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 specifies ßarrestin1 (ßarr1)-dependent signaling. We demonstrate by pharmacologic inhibition of GRK2/3-mediated phosphorylation of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 coupled with site-directed mutagenesis and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer approaches that distal, not proximal, C-tail phosphorylation sites are required for recruitment of the adaptor protein STAM1 (signal-transducing adaptor molecule) to ßarr1 and focal adhesion kinase phosphorylation but not extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 phosphorylation. In addition, we show that GPCRs that have similarly positioned C-tail phosphoresidues are also able to recruit STAM1 to ßarr1. However, although necessary for some GPCRs, we found that distal C-tail sites might not be sufficient to specify recruitment of STAM1 to ßarr1 for other GPCRs. In conclusion, this study provides evidence that distal C-tail phosphorylation sites specify GRK-ßarrestin-mediated signaling by CXCR4 and other GPCRs.

Surveying nonvisual arrestins reveals allosteric interactions between functional sites.

Arrestins are important scaffolding proteins that are expressed in all vertebrate animals. They regulate cell-signaling events upon binding to active G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) and trigger endocytosis of active GPCRs. While many of the functional sites on arrestins have been characterized, the question of how these sites interact is unanswered. We used anisotropic network modeling (ANM) together with our covariance compliment techniques to survey all the available structures of the nonvisual arrestins to map how structural changes and protein-binding affect their structural dynamics. We found that activation and clathrin binding have a marked effect on arrestin dynamics, and that these dynamics changes are localized to a small number of distant functional sites. These sites include α-helix 1, the lariat loop, nuclear localization domain, and the C-domain ß-sheets on the C-loop side. Our techniques suggest that clathrin binding and/or GPCR activation of arrestin perturb the dynamics of these sites independent of structural changes.

Amphetamine pretreatment blunts dopamine-induced D2/D3-receptor occupancy by an arrestin-mediated mechanism: A PET study in internalization compromised mice.

While all reversible receptor-targeting radioligands for positron emission tomography (PET) can be displaced by competition with an antagonist at the receptor, many radiotracers show limited occupancies using agonists even at high doses. [11C]Raclopride, a D2/D3 receptor radiotracer with rapid kinetics, can identify the direction of changes in the neurotransmitter dopamine, but quantitative interpretation of the relationship between dopamine levels and radiotracer binding has proven elusive. Agonist-induced receptor desensitization and internalization, a homeostatic mechanism to downregulate neurotransmitter-mediated function, can shift radioligand-receptor binding affinity and confound PET interpretations of receptor occupancy. In this study, we compared occupancies induced by amphetamine (AMP) in drug-naive wild-type (WT) and internalization-compromised ß-arrestin-2 knockout (KO) mice using a within-scan drug infusion to modulate the kinetics of [11C]raclopride. We additionally performed studies at 3 h following AMP pretreatment, with the hypothesis that receptor internalization should markedly attenuate occupancy on the second challenge, because dopamine cannot access internalized receptors. Without prior AMP treatment, WT mice exhibited somewhat larger binding potential than KO mice but similar AMP-induced occupancy. At 3 h after AMP treatment, WT mice exhibited binding potentials that were 15 % lower than KO mice. At this time point, occupancy was preserved in KO mice but suppressed by 60 % in WT animals, consistent with a model in which most receptors contributing to binding potential in WT animals were not functional. These results demonstrate that arrestin-mediated receptor desensitization and internalization produce large effects in PET [11C]raclopride occupancy studies using agonist challenges.

Retina-arrestin specific CD8+ T cells are not implicated in HLA-A29-positive birdshot chorioretinitis.

BACKGROUND: HLA-A29-positive birdshot chorioretinitis (BCR) is an inflammatory eye disorder that is generally assumed to be caused by an autoimmune response to HLA-A29-presented peptides from retinal arrestin (SAG), yet the epitopes recognized by CD8+ T cells from patients remain to be identified. OBJECTIVES: The identification of natural ligands of SAG presented by HLA-A29. To quantify CD8+ T cells reactive to antigenic SAG peptides presented by HLA-A29 in patients and controls. METHODS: We performed mass-spectrometry based immunopeptidomics of HLA-A29 of antigen-presenting cell lines from patients engineered to express SAG. MHC-I Dextramer technology was utilised to determine expansion of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells reactive to SAG peptides in complex with HLA-A29 in a cohort of BCR patients, HLA-A29-positive controls, and HLA-A29-negative controls. RESULTS: We report on the naturally presented antigenic SAG peptides identified by sequencing the HLA-A29 immunopeptidome of antigen-presenting cells of patients. We show that the N-terminally extended SAG peptide precursors can be trimmed in vitro by the antigen-processing aminopeptidases ERAP1 and ERAP2. Unexpectedly, no enhanced antigen engagement by CD8+ T cells upon stimulation with SAG peptides was observed in patients or HLA-A29-positive controls. Multiplexed HLA-A29-peptide dextramer profiling of a case-control cohort revealed that CD8+ T cells specific for these SAG peptides were neither detectable in peripheral blood nor in eye biopsies of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, these findings demonstrate that SAG is not a CD8+ T cell autoantigen and sharply contrast the paradigm in the pathogenesis of BCR. Therefore, the mechanism by which HLA-A29 is associated with BCR does not involve SAG.

TORC2 inhibition of α-arrestin Aly3 mediates cell surface persistence of S. pombe Ght5 glucose transporter in low glucose.

In the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the high-affinity hexose transporter, Ght5, must be transcriptionally upregulated and localized to the cell surface for cell division under limited glucose. Although cell-surface localization of Ght5 depends on Target of rapamycin complex 2 (TORC2), the molecular mechanisms by which TORC2 ensures proper localization of Ght5 remain unknown. We performed genetic screening for gene mutations that restore Ght5 localization on the cell surface in TORC2-deficient mutant cells, and identified a gene encoding an uncharacterized α-arrestin-like protein, Aly3/SPCC584.15c. α-arrestins are thought to recruit a ubiquitin ligase to membrane-associated proteins. Consistently, Ght5 is ubiquitylated in TORC2-deficient cells, and this ubiquitylation is dependent on Aly3. TORC2 supposedly enables cell-surface localization of Ght5 by preventing Aly3-dependent ubiquitylation and subsequent ubiquitylation-dependent translocation of Ght5 to vacuoles. Surprisingly, nitrogen starvation, but not glucose depletion, triggers Aly3-dependent transport of Ght5 to vacuoles in S. pombe, unlike budding yeast hexose transporters, vacuolar transport of which is initiated upon changes in hexose concentration. This study provides new insights into the molecular mechanisms controlling the subcellular localization of hexose transporters in response to extracellular stimuli.

Sequestration of Gßγ by deubiquitinated arrestins into the nucleus as a novel desensitization mechanism of G protein-coupled receptors.

BACKGROUND: Desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) refers to a rapid attenuation of responsiveness that occurs with repeated or continuous exposure to agonists. GRK-mediated phosphorylation and subsequent binding with arrestins in the activated receptor cytoplasmic cavity in competition with G proteins has been suggested as the conventional mechanism of desensitization. Along with widely accepted conventional mechanism of desensitization, studies of various GPCRs including dopamine D2-like receptors (D2R, D3R, D4R) have suggested the existence of another desensitization mechanism. In this study, loss-of-function approaches and D2-like receptor mutants that display different desensitization properties were used to elucidate the molecular mechanisms responsible for desensitization. RESULTS: Desensitization development entailed the signaling cascade composed of Src, PDK1, and Akt, the latter of which in turn interacted with USP33, an arrestin deubiquitinase, to promote arrestin deubiquitination. The deubiquitinated arrestin subsequently formed a complex with Gßγ and translocated to the nucleus via an importin complex, wherein it sequestered Gßγ from the receptor and Gα, thereby attenuating receptor signaling. As in D2-like receptors, both USP33 and importin ß1 were involved in the desensitization of the ß2 adrenoceptor. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to the conventional mechanism of desensitization, which occurs on the plasma membrane and in the cytosol, this study provides a new insight that another desensitization pathway in which nuclear trafficking plays a critical role is operating. It is plausible that multiple, complementary desensitization measures are in place to properly induce desensitization depending on receptor characteristics or the surrounding environment. Video Abstract.