Quantitative ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene wear in total elbow retrievals.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) wear and damage from retrieved total elbow arthroplasty components and compare in vivo wear with wear produced in vitro. METHODS: Explanted total elbow components were collected at revision surgery. UHMWPE damage was characterized visually, whereas penetration and wear were quantified using micro-computed tomography and gas pycnometry. Volumetric wear rates were compared with historical hip data, and wear data were compared with reported in vitro wear test data. RESULTS: Humeral bushing damage primarily occurred in the form of burnishing, scratching, and pitting at the articular face in the region of contact with the ulnar component. Wear of the ulnar bushings was concentrated on the edge of the component at the point of contact with the axis pin. Pitting and embedded debris were dominant damage modes, in addition to burnishing and delamination. Backside wear was negligible. The median linear penetration rates of the lateral, medial, and ulnar bushings were 0.14 mm/yr (range, 0.01-0.78 mm/yr), 0.12 mm/yr (range, 0.03-0.55 mm/yr), and 0.11 mm/yr (range, 0.01-0.69 mm/yr), respectively. The volumetric wear rates of the lateral, medial, and ulnar bushings were 5.5 mm3/yr (range, 0.7-37.2 mm3/yr), 5.9 mm3/yr (range, 0.6-25.5 mm3/yr), and 5.5 mm3/yr (range, 1.2-51.2 mm3/yr), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The observed wear rates were similar to those reported in well-functioning total hip replacement patients with conventional UHMWPE bearings. We found limitations in reported in vitro testing resulting in wear that was not consistent with our retrieval data. We recommend further investigation to clinically validate in vitro simulation to provide appropriate loading protocols for elbow wear simulation.

Long-term outcomes after Instrumented Bone Preserving total elbow arthroplasty: a radiostereometric study with a minimum follow-up of 10 years.

BACKGROUND: Aseptic loosening is a main concern in elbow arthroplasty. Evaluation of implant migration using radiostereometric analysis (RSA) might increase understanding of implant loosening. Previously, 2-year RSA results of 16 Instrumented Bone Preserving (IBP) elbow prostheses showed migration of the humeral component in the first weeks but most components stabilized within 6 months postoperatively. In follow-up, the present study evaluated long-term survival, the relation between early migration and survival, and the long-term migration and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Sixteen patients who received an IBP prosthesis were prospectively followed with a median follow-up time of 136 months (range 82-165). Migration was measured using RSA. Clinical results were described using the Elbow Function Assessment (EFA), Broberg and Morrey elbow functional rating index, Oxford Elbow Score (OES), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction. RESULTS: Four patients underwent a revision within 10 years, and 2 more were planned for revision surgery after 14 years. Five patients died with their prosthesis in situ. Early migration was not associated with survival. Long-term migration patterns varied widely. Median EFA score was 58.5, Broberg and Morrey score was 50, and OES score was 32. Median VAS score for pain was 2 and that for satisfaction was 7.5. CONCLUSION: Ten-year survival of the IBP total elbow prosthesis was 75%, decreasing to 63% after 14 years of follow-up. Long-term implant failure could not be predicted by 2-year migration results in this study. Although short-term clinical results were promising, long-term outcomes worsened in all patients.

Neurologic complications after surgical management of complex elbow trauma requiring radial head replacement.

BACKGROUND: Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) has become a successful procedure for addressing acute unreconstructible radial head fractures that compromise elbow stability in complex elbow trauma. The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of and risk factors for the development of neurologic complications after surgical treatment of complex elbow fractures that require an RHA. METHODS: Sixty-two patients with an unreconstructible radial head fracture and complex elbow instability treated with RHA were included. There were 33 men and 29 women, with a mean age of 54 years (range, 22-87 years). The average follow-up period was 5.2 years (range, 3-16 years). All patients were neurologically intact before surgery. The arthroplasty was implanted through a Kocher approach in 55 cases, whereas a Kaplan approach was used in 7. An uncemented smooth stem arthroplasty (Evolve) was used in 27 patients, and an anatomic ingrowth system (Anatomic Radial Head), in 35. At the time of surgery, 23 patients underwent fixation of a coronoid fracture and 15 underwent plating of the proximal ulna. All patients were clinically examined immediately after surgery and during follow-up to detect any degree of neurologic deficit. Radial and ulnar nerve injuries were classified according to the Hirachi and McGowan classifications, respectively. Functional outcomes were evaluated with the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. RESULTS: A complete posterior interosseous nerve palsy occurred postoperatively in 2 patients. Hand function had completely recovered in both at 2 months after surgery without sequelae. Nine patients complained of ulnar nerve symptoms (immediately after surgery in 6 and as delayed ulnar neuropathy in 3). Most patients with ulnar nerve deficits had undergone additional surgical procedures to address ulnar fractures. Among patients with ulnar neuropathies, only 3 complained of mild sensory symptoms at the latest follow-up. No significant differences in range of motion and Mayo Elbow Performance Score were found between patients with and without neurologic complications. Associated olecranon or coronoid fixation and a prolonged tourniquet time were identified as risk factors for neurologic complications. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the incidence of neurologic complications associated with the surgical treatment of complex elbow fractures requiring implantation of a radial head prosthesis may be underestimated in the literature. Inappropriate retraction in the anterior aspect of the radial neck, a prolonged ischemia time, and concomitant coronoid or olecranon fracture fixation represent the main risk factors for the development of this complication. Although the great majority of patients have full recovery of their nerve function, they should be advised on the risk of this stressful complication.

Long-term results of the iBP elbow prosthesis: beware of destructive metallosis!

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to review the long-term results of the instrumented Bone Preserving (iBP) elbow prosthesis. METHODS: Thirty-one patients (10 M, 21F, 28-77 year) were retrospectively evaluated using the Oxford Elbow Score (OES), Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure (DASH), Mayo Elbow Performance (MEPS), physical examination and standard radiographs. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used. RESULTS: Thirty-seven primary iBPs have been placed in 31 patients between 2000 and 2007. Six patients (8 prostheses) had died, 10 elbows had been revised and three patients (4 prostheses) were lost to follow-up. Fourteen patients (15 prostheses) were available for follow-up. The main indication for surgery was rheumatoid arthritis. Mean follow-up was 11 years (8-15). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a survival of 81% at 10 years after surgery. Main reason for revision was particle disease and loosening due to instability and malalignment. Eleven of 14 patients were satisfied, although radiographs showed radiolucencies in 11 patients. CONCLUSION: The iBP elbow prosthesis gives a survival rate of 81% 10 years after surgery with a progressive decline beyond 10 years. However, many patients have radiolucencies. Discrepancy between clinical signs and radiological results warrants structural follow-up, to assure quality of bone stock in case revision surgery is indicated. The study was reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of University Medical Center Groningen (METc2016/038). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Case series.

Total Elbow Arthroplasty: Elbow Biomechanics and Failure.

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) has lower revision-free survivorship than other major joint replacement. Despite this, elbow replacement has remained popular. Surgical technique for TEA destabilizes the elbow by removing the medial and lateral collateral ligaments and, frequently, the radiocapitellar articulation. Current semiconstrained implants aim to allow for physiological varus and valgus motion by employing a sloppy hinge; however, over time, these designs fail owing to nonanatomic force transmission. Nonanatomic force transmission results from ligament release, force transmission primarily to the humeral and ulnar shafts, and radial head resection. These altered biomechanics may be the source of complications seen in semiconstrained arthroplasty. These complications perpetuate the cycle of failure and ultimately have poor salvage options.

Physiological Loading of the Coonrad/Morrey, Nexel, and Discovery Elbow Systems: Evaluation by Finite Element Analysis.

PURPOSE: Wear of polyethylene bearings represents a limiting factor in the long-term success of total elbow prostheses. Bearing stress is 1 factor contributing to accelerated wear. Physiological loading of total elbow prostheses and implant design influence upon bearing stresses have not been well described. This study evaluates bearing stresses in 3 commercially available implant designs under loads associated with daily living. METHODS: Motion tracking from a healthy volunteer helped establish a musculoskeletal model to simulate flexor and extensor muscle activation at 0°, 45°, and 90° of shoulder abduction with a 2.3-kg weight in hand-forces and moments were measured at the elbow. Resulting physiological joint reaction forces and moments were applied to finite element models of 3 total elbow bearing designs (Coonrad/Morrey, Nexel, and Discovery) to evaluate contact area and polyethylene stresses. RESULTS: Increasing shoulder abduction resulted in minimal changes to the elbow joint reaction force but greater joint moments. All implants showed greater peak stresses with increasing shoulder abduction-elbow varus. Discovery and Nexel achieved greater contact area (23% vs > 100%) and demonstrated up to 39% lower peak polyethylene stresses compared with the Coonrad/Morrey design. CONCLUSIONS: Shoulder abduction results in a varus moment at the elbow. Newer bearing designs (Nexel and Discovery) provide a combination of higher contact area, improved load sharing, reduced edge loading, and lower stresses through elbow range of motion when compared with a cylindrical hinge-bearing design (Coonrad/Morrey). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although the Coonrad/Morrey is a clinically successful prosthesis, our physiological loading model shows that Discovery and Nexel provide greater contact area, better load sharing and lower peak stresses. This may lead to a decrease in polyethylene wear rates and the eventual risks of osteolysis and aseptic loosening. Further studies are needed to determine how these findings translate clinically.

Outcomes after revision total elbow arthroplasty: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Although revision arthroplasty surgery is a frequently used treatment for failed total elbow arthroplasty (TEA), published results are conflicting. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an overview of the outcomes of revision TEA surgery. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in major databases to find articles relating to outcomes after revision of TEA. Two reviewers independently screened the articles for inclusion, and a third reviewer screened them before final inclusion. RESULTS: Twenty-one articles containing 532 cases were included. The mean age at revision was 61 years. The mean interval between primary and revision arthroplasty was 77 months, and the average follow-up period was 65 months. Different types of prostheses were included, with 69% of the revision prostheses having linked designs and 31% having unlinked designs. The visual analog scale score, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, Oxford Elbow Score, and range of motion improved significantly after revision surgery. Complications were reported in 232 of 532 cases (44%), leading to reoperations in 22%. After revision with linked prostheses, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, range of flexion-extension, and pronation improved significantly more than with unlinked designs. CONCLUSION: Improved functional outcomes can be expected after revision TEA, but the complication rate remains high. Revision TEA should still be considered a salvage procedure for failed TEA. Linked designs for revision TEA result in better outcomes than unlinked designs in the midterm follow-up.

Surgical approaches for total elbow arthroplasties using data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.

BACKGROUND: Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is a relatively infrequently performed procedure. Therefore, nationwide databases help to provide more insight into factors that might influence implant survival, for example, the surgical approach used. Using data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register, we aimed to reveal whether high-volume centers use different approaches than low-volume centers and whether the approach is implant specific. METHODS: Using data from 2014 to 2017, we compared the surgical approaches used for high- vs. low-volume centers, as well as for the 2 most frequently used types of TEA, by use of χ2 tests. RESULTS: We analyzed 276 procedures. In 2016 and 2017, when posterior approaches were further specified, the triceps-on approach was used most frequently in the high-volume center (27 of 42 procedures, 64%) and the triceps-flap approach was used most often in the low-volume centers (48 of 84 procedures, 57%) (P < .001). For the 2 most frequently used types of TEA, the Coonrad-Morrey and Latitude EV arthroplasties, the surgical approaches did not differ. When the high-volume center was compared with the low-volume centers, implant choice differed, with the Coonrad-Morrey arthroplasty being most often used in the high-volume center and the Latitude EV arthroplasty, in the low-volume centers. CONCLUSION: The posterior triceps-flap approach was the most frequently used surgical approach in primary TEA in the Netherlands, yet the triceps-on approach was used more often in the high-volume center. The surgical approaches did not differ between the 2 most frequently used types of TEA in the Netherlands.

Clinical outcome of Niigata-Senami-Kyocera modular unconstrained total elbow arthroplasty for destructive elbow in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is a treatment option for destructive and painful unstable elbows in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We evaluated the clinical outcomes of unconstrained TEA (Niigata-Senami-Kyocera modular system). METHODS: Seventy-five unconstrained TEAs were performed in patients with RA (mean age, 64 years; age range, 41-79 years; follow-up rate, 97%). Outcome measures included the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) functional evaluation score for the elbow joint (JOA score), range of motion, and arc. Bone ingrowth of the humeral component, the incidence of stress shielding around the humeral component, the incidence of loosening of the ulnar component, complications, and the survival rate were investigated. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 5.2 years (range, 2-11.3 years). The JOA elbow score improved from 42 points preoperatively to 87 points postoperatively (P < .0001). Each specified item improved (P < .0001). Flexion improved from 109° to 134°; the flexion-plus-extension arc improved from 70° to 108° (P < .0001). Bone ingrowth of the humeral implant was achieved in all elbows. Stress shielding of the humeral component was detected in 11 elbows (14%); it was significantly higher in 10- and 9-mm-diameter humeral stems than in 8-mm-diameter humeral stems (P = .008). The ulnar component showed no loosening except in 1 elbow owing to infection. Complications were detected in 9 patients (9 elbows, 12%): periprosthetic infection (3), fracture (4), and dislocation (2). The survival rates were 97% at 5 years and 93% at 10 years postoperatively. DISCUSSION: The Niigata-Senami-Kyocera modular system for patients with RA showed good outcomes. Stress shielding can be avoided by using an 8-mm-diameter humeral stem.

Megaprosthetic replacement of the distal humerus: still a challenge in limb salvage.

BACKGROUND: The distal humerus is a rare location of bone tumors. Because of the complexity of the elbow joint, poor soft-tissue coverage, and proximity of nerves and vessels, resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction are demanding. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated the clinical results after distal humeral resection and megaprosthetic reconstruction in 12 patients with an average age of 46 years. All patient files were reviewed for clinical information, and postoperative function and patients' contentment were assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score. RESULTS: The predominant diagnoses were bone and soft-tissue sarcoma (n = 6), giant cell tumor (n = 2), and renal cell carcinoma metastasis (n = 2). Local recurrence was the reason for secondary amputation in all cases (n = 3). The prosthetic survival rate after surgery was 82% at 2 years and 64% at 5 years. Reconstruction failure was mainly caused by aseptic loosening of the humeral stem, occurring in 27% (n = 3), followed by aseptic loosening of the ulnar stem in 9% (n = 1) and periprosthetic infection in 9% (n = 1). The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 24 points (range, 20-30 points). An extension lag of more than 10° was noted in 6 patients (55%). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that limb salvage with a distal humeral replacement can achieve good functional results in most patients, although the complication rate with special emphasis on the loosening rate of the humeral stem is high. However, limb salvage was not achieved in 27% of patients because of local recurrence.

Arthroplasty as primary treatment for distal humeral fractures produces reliable results with regards to revisions and adverse events: a registry-based study.

BACKGROUND: Primary prosthetic replacement has become an accepted method for the treatment of complex distal humeral fractures. The present study investigated implant survival and adverse events related to this procedure based on available Swedish registries and examined the completeness of the Swedish Elbow Arthroplasty register. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated in Sweden with a primary elbow replacement due to a distal humeral fracture between 1999 and 2014 were identified through 3 different registries: The Swedish Elbow Arthroplasty Register, National Board of Health and Welfare inpatient register, and local registries of all orthopedic departments. Prosthetic survival was examined using Cox regression analysis with Kaplan-Meier plots. Adverse events, defined as medical treatment of the affected elbow besides revision, were analyzed separately. The study included 406 elbows in 405 patients, and no register was complete. RESULTS: Implant survival at 10 years was 90% (95% confidence interval, 85%-96%), but only 45 patients had an observation time of 10 years or more because 46% of the patients had died, resulting in a mean observation time of 67 (standard deviation, 47) months. An increase in the use of hemiarthroplasties and a proportional decrease of total elbow arthroplasties was detected. There were 18 revisions (4%), and 26 patients (6%) experienced an adverse event, of whom 16 (4%) required surgery. The completeness of the Swedish Elbow Arthroplasty Register regarding primary arthroplasty was 81%. CONCLUSION: Primary arthroplasty as treatment of distal humeral fractures produces reliable results with regards to revisions and other adverse events.

Development of a hybrid computational/experimental framework for evaluation of damage mechanisms of a linked semiconstrained total elbow system.

BACKGROUND: Long-term durability of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is a concern, and bearing wear or excessive deformations may necessitate early revision. The current study used experimental wear testing and computational finite element modeling to develop a hybrid computational and experimental framework for the evaluation of TEA damage mechanisms. METHODS: Three Coonrad-Morrey (Zimmer-Biomet Inc., Warsaw, IN, USA) TEA implants were used for experimental wear testing for 200,000 cycles. Gravimetric measurements were performed before and after the tests to assess the weight change caused by wear. A finite element model of the implant was also developed to analyze ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) damage. RESULTS: High localized contact pressures caused visible creep and plastic flow, deforming bushings and creating unintended UHMWPE-on-UHMWPE contact surfaces where considerably high wear rates were observed. Average experimentally measured vs. model-predicted wear was 9.5 ± 1.0 vs. 14.1 mg for the of the medial bushing, 8.5 ± 1.0 vs. 13.9 mg for the lateral humeral bushing, and 34.1 ± 0.7 vs. 36.9 mg for the ulnar bushings, respectively. Model predicted contact stresses on the surfaces of bushings were substantially higher than the yield limit of conventional UHMWPE (87 MPa for the humeral bushings and 83 MPa for the ulnar bushing). CONCLUSIONS: Our study discovered that unintended wear at UHMWPE-UHMWPE contact surfaces, "fed" by excessive plastic flow may, in fact, be of more concern than wear that occurs at the intended metal-UHMWPE contact interfaces. Furthermore, formation of high localized contact stresses much above the yield limit of UHMWPE is another likely contributor to bushing failure for this implant.

Long-term outcome of custom triflange outrigger ulnar component in revision total elbow arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patients missing the distal humeral condyles are prone to premature bushing wear after total elbow arthroplasty. A midterm study has demonstrated that a custom triflange outrigger ulnar component was successful in preventing this. The aim of this study was to determine whether these results remained stable over time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The outcomes of 6 patients who underwent revision of a loose ulnar component using a custom triflange outrigger component were reviewed in this retrospective case study. The average patient age at the time of revision was 51. The average number of prior operations was 2 (range, 1-3). The mean follow-up was 15 years (range, 10-18 years). RESULTS: At final follow-up, the mean range of extension-flexion was 35° to 135°, and pronation-supination was 65° to 63°. The average Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved to 75 of 100. Four implants were still in place with no radiolucencies or osteolysis. Three patients required revision surgery for broken humeral stems. Two required conversion to another total elbow arthroplasty system after 18 and 14 years for humeral component loosening. CONCLUSIONS: These components lasted an average of 4 times longer than the original ulnar components. In our experience, periarticular osteolysis caused by polyethylene wear creates a region of unsupported stem and a stress riser at the junction with the remaining well-supported stem and causes component stem fractures. The concept of an outrigger type of hinge might be useful for active patients requiring an elbow prosthesis in the setting of deficient condyles.

Computed tomography-based 3-dimensional preoperative planning for unlinked total elbow arthroplasty.

HYPOTHESIS: Three-dimensional (3D) surgical planning for unlinked total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) would be helpful for estimation of the implant size and accurate placement of implants. METHODS: We included 28 patients who underwent TEA with an unlinked total elbow implant in this study. All patients underwent computed tomography scans of the elbow before surgery, and a 3D digital model of the elbow was reconstructed. After the appropriate size and position of the prosthesis were determined, 10 points around the bone tunnel (4 on the humerus and 6 on the ulna) were measured to plan the insertion of the humeral and ulnar stems. Two-dimensional planning was also performed using anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. Intraoperatively, the surgeon measured the planned parameters using a slide gauge to reproduce the 3D planned position of the stem insertion. RESULTS: The stem sizes were accurately estimated in 57% of patients for the humerus and 68% for the ulna with 2-dimensional planning and in 86% for the humerus and 96% for the ulna with 3D planning. The mean differences between the positions of the prostheses after surgery with reference to the planned positions were 0.8° of varus and 1.5° of flexion for the humeral component and 0.7° of varus and 2.9° of flexion for the ulnar component. We did not evaluate rotational positioning in this study. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D surgical planning allowed accurate estimation of the implant size and appropriate placement of implants. This method may contribute to a reduced incidence of complications and improved long-term outcomes from TEA.

The radiocapitellar synovial fold: a lateral anatomic landmark for sizing radial head arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Successful radial head arthroplasty relies on reproduction of anatomy. We hypothesized that the radiocapitellar synovial fold could serve as a reference point in radial head prosthesis sizing. Our study aimed to define the relationship between the synovial fold and the radial head in elbows with and without lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of 34 elbows to determine the normal relationship between the radiocapitellar synovial fold and the radial head. Next, we used cadaveric dissections to evaluate the anatomic relationships with the LUCL intact and disrupted, as well as in the setting of sizing with a radial head prosthesis. The fold-to-radial head distance (FRHD) was measured on all images and analyzed to determine the relationship of the synovial fold and radial head. RESULTS: The FRHD in cadavers with an intact LUCL and native radial head measured an average of 1.5 mm proximal to the radial head. With the LUCL disrupted and a native radial head, the FRHD measured an average of 1.2 mm proximal to the radial head. The mean difference between the groups was 0.5 mm (P = .031), suggesting that the fold migrated distally in the cadavers with a disrupted LUCL. CONCLUSION: The radiocapitellar synovial fold may be a helpful landmark for radial head sizing. The synovial fold is always just proximal to the articular surface of the radial head. Using this information, the surgeon can prevent overlengthening as the implant should not be placed proximal to the fold.

Results of cementless total elbow arthroplasty using the Discovery elbow system at a mean follow-up of 61.8 months.

BACKGROUND: The available literature on the use of a cementless total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) design and its results are limited. This clinical study reports the outcome of the cementless Discovery elbow system. METHODS: Patients were operated on by a single surgeon between 2007 and 2014. Nineteen patients (20 elbows) were available for review, 2 women (1 bilateral TEA) and 17 men. The age of the patients ranged from 27 to 75 years (mean, 48 years). The mean follow-up was 61.8 months (range, 12-156 months). Patients were assessed for range of motion, pain, and satisfaction level. Outcome scores included the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, the Liverpool Elbow Score, and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (version 1). Radiographs were reviewed to evaluate for loosening. RESULTS: The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 77.25, and the mean Liverpool Elbow Score was 6.76. The mean flexion range was 123°, and the mean extension lag was 35°. The mean pronation was 59°, and the mean supination was 58°. On radiologic evaluation, there were no signs of loosening; however, in 2 cases, nonprogressive radiolucent lines were observed. No signs of infection were detected at final follow-up, and no elbows were revised. More than 90% of patients were satisfied with the overall outcome. CONCLUSION: The cementless TEA seems to be a reliable option for treatment of varying elbow diseases. Long-term results are needed to assess the survivorship of this design.

Total elbow arthroplasty: a radiographic outcome study.

OBJECTIVES: Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is becoming a popular alternative to arthrodesis for patients with end-stage elbow arthrosis and comminuted distal humeral fractures. Prior outcome studies have primarily focused on surgical findings. Our purpose is to determine the radiographic outcome of TEA and to correlate with clinical symptoms such as pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is an IRB-approved retrospective review from 2005 to 2015 of all patients with semiconstrained TEA. All available elbow radiographs and clinical data were reviewed. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier survival curves for radiographic and clinical survival. RESULTS: A total of 104 total elbow arthroplasties in 102 patients were reviewed; 75 % were in women and the mean patient age was 63.1 years. Mean radiographic follow-up was 826 days with average of four radiographs per patient. Seventy TEAs (67 %) developed radiographic complications, including heterotopic ossification (48 %), perihardware lucency (27 %), periprosthetic fracture (23 %), hardware subluxation/dislocation (7 %), polyethylene wear (3 %), and hardware fracture/dislodgement (3 %); 56 patients (55 %) developed symptoms of elbow pain or instability and 30 patients (30 %) underwent at least one reoperation. In patients with radiographic complications, 66 % developed elbow pain, compared to 19 % of patients with no radiologic complications (p = 0.001). Of the patients with radiographic complications, 39 % had at least one additional surgery compared to 0 % of patients without radiographic complications (p = 0.056). CONCLUSIONS: Radiographic complications are common in patients after total elbow arthroplasty. There is a strong positive association between post-operative radiographic findings and clinical outcome. Knowledge of common postoperative radiographic findings is important for the practicing radiologist.

Pre-operative templating in total elbow arthroplasty: not useful.

PURPOSE: Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is a definitive surgical procedure for treating rheumatoid arthritis and (posttraumatic) osteoarthritis of the elbow and is also useful in comminuted elbow fractures. Pre-operative digital templating may theoretically improve the surgical implantation of TEA, but reliability and predictive values of templating are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the intra- and inter-observer reliability and the validity of pre-operative digital templating for TEA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All pre-operative plain anterior-posterior and lateral calibrated elbow radiographs from patients who underwent TEA in our center from 2008 to June 2014 were reviewed. Two independent assessors templated implant sizes using digital overlays twice. Intra- and inter-observer reliability were evaluated with Cohen's kappa. Two experienced elbow surgeons reviewed post-operative radiographs for evaluation. The predictive value of templating was the percentage of the correctly templated sizes, with the optimal implant size as the reference standard. RESULTS: Twenty-one cases were included. Intra-observer reliability was substantial to almost perfect (κ = 0.61 and κ = 0.90) for humeral implants, moderate to substantial (κ = 0.54 and κ = 0.73) for ulnar implants. Inter-observer reliability was substantial (κ = 0.67) for humeral implants and moderate (κ = 0.60) for ulnar implants. The predictive value was 53 % for both implants. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative digital templating for TEA is a reliable method to plan implant sizes. However, the predictive value is low.

[Post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow joint : Endoprosthetic options in young patients]. / Sekundäre Arthrose des Ellenbogengelenkes : Endoprothetische Möglichkeiten beim jungen Patienten.

BACKGROUND: In young patients, post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow is a rare condition. Whereas clinical manifestations often differ from radiological findings, pain and stiffness are variably combined in symptomatic forms. In deciding whether to perform surgery, the patient's age, activity level, and symptoms, as well as the location and severity of the osteoarthritis have to be taken into account. Elbow joint instability has to be identified to stop the post-traumatic osteoarthritic progress. If joint preserving surgical methods fail, diverse options for partial or total joint replacement are available. THERAPY: The treatment goal in young patients, therefore, is to reduce pain with a sufficient range of elbow motion.

The effect of using a cement gun with a narrow nozzle on cement penetration for total elbow arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.

PURPOSE: To compare the cement mantle characteristics associated with use of a narrow nozzle cement gun versus the use of a 60-mL catheter tip syringe. METHODS: Twelve cadaveric distal humeri were cemented with either a cement gun or a syringe without canal occlusion. The humeri were sectioned and photographed. The corticocancellous junction and the outer margin of the cement mantle were analyzed digitally. The corticocancellous junction defined the available area for cement penetration. The outline of the cement mantle defined the actual area of penetration. The ratio of penetration to the available area was recorded for each slice. The mean ratio for each humerus was multiplied by the number of slices in that sample containing cement to calculate a cement index. RESULTS: The cement penetration ratios observed in cross-sections at the same level and the cement index were significantly greater with the use of the cement gun than with the use of the syringe. There was no difference in the number of slices that contained cement. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a cement gun with a narrow nozzle improved cement mantle characteristics compared with the use of a syringe when measured in a cadaveric model in the absence of canal occlusion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Improving cement mantle characteristics may decrease the incidence of aseptic loosening after total elbow arythroplasty.