A randomized phase II trial of bevacizumab vs. bevacizumab and erlotinib as first-line consolidation after carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab in newly diagnosed patients with mullerian tumors.

BACKGROUND: The combination of paclitaxel to platinum remains the backbone of therapy in patients with advanced Mullerian tumors. In patients with newly diagnosed Mullerian tumors, we investigated the progression-free survival benefit of bevacizumab and bevacizumab and erlotinib as consolidation therapy post-induction therapy. METHODS: Sixty patients were enrolled in a phase II trial of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab (induction therapy). After the completion induction therapy, patients were stratified by response (≥ SD) and then randomized (1:1) to either bevacizumab (A) or bevacizumab and erlotinib (AE.) The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints included the response rate of induction and consolidation therapy and toxicity profile of each consolidative arm. Each consolidative arm was compared to the historical control GOG 111. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients advanced to the consolidative phase of the trial. Twelve patients were removed in the induction phase, the majority for toxicity. The most common toxicity (grade ≥ 3) was diarrhea (20%: arm AE; 0%: arm A). One patient in the AE arm had a fatal cardiac arrest deemed unrelated to the study treatment. No gastrointestinal perforations were reported. The median PFS in the AE and A arm was 18.9 months (p < 0.0001) and 13.3 months (p: ns), respectively. The overall rate of grade 3/4 toxicities in the AE arm was 72% and in the A arm 30%. Six patients remain free of disease 10 years after enrollment. CONCLUSION: Combinatorial consolidation therapy with AE was associated with an improved progression-free survival in patients with Mullerian tumors.

Reliability and toxicity of bevacizumab for neurofibromatosis type 2-related vestibular schwannomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The anti-angiogenic agent bevacizumab is currently the only drug used clinically for neurofibromatosis type 2-related vestibular schwannomas (NF2-VS). Though benefits have been demonstrated in several cases, the standardized dosage remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: Our meta-analysis was performed to systematically and comprehensively investigate the reliability and toxicity of bevacizumab in the treatment of NF2-VS, with particular emphasis on the impact of dosage. METHODS: The literature search was conducted for studies providing data on patients treated with bevacizumab for NF2-VS across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library until December 31, 2020. Two reviewers extracted the incidence rate of results independently. Then we calculated and pooled unadjusted incidence rate with 95% CIs for each study. The subgroups analyzed were conducted. RESULTS: Fourteen citations (prospective or retrospective observational cohort studies) were eligible based on data from a total of 247 patients with NF2 and 332 related VSs. The pooled results showed that the radiographic response rate (RRR) was 30% [95% CI (20%-42%)], the hearing response rate (HRR) was 32% [95% CI (21%-45%)]. The incidence of major complications was: hypertension 29% [95% CI (23%-35%)], proteinuria 30% [95% CI (18%-44%)], menstrual disorders 44% [95% CI (16%-73%)], hemorrhage 14% [95% CI (4%-26%)], grade3/4 events 12% [95% CI (4%-22%)]. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one-third of NF2-VS patients may benefit significantly from bevacizumab due to hearing improvement and tumor reduction. Menstrual disorders were the most common adverse events. The high-dose regimen didn't show better efficacy, but results varied considerably according to age.

Role of renin-angiotensin system antagonists in the prevention of bevacizumab- and sunitinib-mediated cardiac dysfunction.

Although anticancer systemic therapy agents clearly lead to improved survival in patients with cancer, these can come at the cost of serious complications including cardiotoxicity. Two types of targeted systemic therapies currently in use for colorectal cancer (CRC) and renal cell cancer (RCC), respectively, include the vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor bevacizumab (BVZ) and the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib (SNT). Despite the beneficial effects of BVZ and SNT in improving clinical outcomes in the settings of CRC and RCC, there is an increased risk of cardiac dysfunction. The aim of the present study was to determine whether prophylactic administration of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors would attenuate the cardiotoxic side effects of BVZ or SNT in a chronic in vivo murine model. A total of 194 wild-type C57Bl/6 male mice received: 1) 0.9% saline, 2) BVZ (10 mg·kg-1·wk-1), or 3) SNT (40 mg·kg-1·day-1) for 4 wk. Within each arm, mice received daily prophylactic treatment with hydralazine (0.05 mg/ml), aliskiren (50 mg/kg), perindopril (4 mg/kg), or valsartan (2 mg/kg). Although hydralazine effectively lowered blood pressure in BVZ- or SNT-treated mice, it did not prevent left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Prophylactic administration of aliskiren, perindopril, or valsartan prevented adverse cardiovascular remodeling in mice treated with either BVZ or SNT. The addition of RAS antagonists also downregulated expression of phosphorylated p38 and Bcl-2-like 19-kDa interacting protein 3 in SNT-treated mice. In our chronic in vivo murine model, RAS antagonists partially attenuated the development of BVZ- or SNT-mediated cardiac dysfunction. Future clinical studies are warranted to investigate the cardioprotective effects of prophylactic treatment with RAS inhibitors in the settings of CRC and RCC. NEW & NOTEWORTHY In the evolving field of cardio-oncology, bevacizumab and sunitinib improve clinical outcomes in the settings of metastatic colorectal cancer and renal cell cancer, respectively. These anticancer drugs, however, are associated with an increased risk of cardiotoxicity. The prophylactic administration of renin-angiotensin system antagonists is partially cardioprotective against bevacizumab- and sunitinib-mediated cardiac dysfunction.

Toxicity and efficacy of lomustine and bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma patients.

The combination of lomustine and bevacizumab is a commonly used salvage treatment for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). We investigated the toxicity and efficacy of lomustine plus bevacizumab (lom-bev) in a community-based patient cohort and made a comparison to another frequently used combination therapy consisting of irinotecan plus bevacizumab (iri-bev). Seventy patients with recurrent GBM were treated with lomustine 90 mg/m2 every 6 weeks and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Toxicity was registered and compared to the toxicity observed in 219 recurrent GBM patients who had previously been treated with irinotecan 125 mg/m2 and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. The response rate was 37.1% for lom-bev and 30.1% for iri-bev. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 23 weeks for lom-bev and 21 weeks for iri-bev (p = 0.9). Overall survival (OS) was 37 weeks for lom-bev and 32 weeks for iri-bev (p = 0.5). Lom-bev caused a significantly higher frequency of thrombocytopenia (11.4% grade 3-4) compared to iri-bev (3.5% grade 3-4). Iri-bev patients had more gastrointestinal toxicity with regard to nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation and stomatitis. Within the limitations of the study lom-bev is a well-tolerated treatment for recurrent GBM, although hematological toxicity may be a dose limiting factor. No significant differences between lom-bev and iri-bev were observed with regard to PFS or OS. The differences in toxicity profiles between lom-bev and iri-bev could guide treatment decision in recurrent GBM therapy as efficacy is equal and no predictive factors for efficacy exist.

Effects of ranibizumab (Lucentis®) and bevacizumab (Avastin®) on human corneal endothelial cells.

BACKGROUND: Ingrowth of newly formed blood and lymph vessels (angiogenesis) from the limbus region into the cornea can be treated successfully by subconjunctival application of antiangiogenic agents. Currently, there are several angiogenesis inhibitors from various manufacturers available, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibodies. The aim of the study was to investigate potential cytotoxic effects of two anti-VEGF agents, ranibizumab (Lucentis®) and bevacizumab (Avastin®) on the human corneal endothelium. METHODS: Human donor corneas, not suitable for corneal transplantation, were organ-cultured in the presence of either ranibizumab (Lucentis®) or bevacizumab (Avastin®) at different concentrations (group 1: 250 µg / ml, group 2: 25 µg / ml, group 3: 2.5 µg / ml) for a period of up to 4 weeks. Microscopic imaging for endothelial cell counting, detection of morphologic alterations of the endothelium, and molecular biology testing (Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay [ELISA]) for metabolic changes was performed. RESULTS: Background-corrected results showed neither a significant lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) change with increasing culturing time nor a significant difference between ranibizumab (Lucentis®) and bevacizumab (Avastin®) treatment. The endothelial cell density revealed also no statistically significant difference between the two treatment groups with ranibizumab (Lucentis®) and bevacizumab (Avastin®) at all concentrations tested in this study. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the anti-angiogenic agents ranibizumab (Lucentis®) and bevacizumab (Avastin®) demonstrated no cytotoxic effects on the corneal endothelium of human organ-cultured donor corneas over the limited study time period of 4 weeks. However, based on the study design (in-vitro) and the limited follow-up period, no conclusions on potential long-term effects can be drawn.

Nonclinical assessments of the potential biosimilar PF-06439535 and bevacizumab.

Bevacizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), is approved for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer, metastatic kidney cancer, and glioblastoma. To support clinical development of the potential bevacizumab biosimilar PF-06439535, nonclinical studies evaluated structural, functional, toxicological, and toxicokinetic similarity to bevacizumab sourced from the European Union (bevacizumab-EU) and United States (bevacizumab-US). Peptide mapping demonstrated the amino acid sequence of PF-06439535 was identical to bevacizumab-EU and bevacizumab-US. Biologic activity, measured via inhibition of VEGF-induced cell proliferation in human umbilical vein endothelial cells and binding to VEGF isoforms, was similar across the three drugs. In vivo similarity was demonstrated in cynomolgus monkeys administered intravenous PF-06439535 or bevacizumab-EU (0 or 10 mg/kg/dose twice weekly for 1 month; total of nine doses). Systemic exposure appeared similar and test article-related effects were limited to physeal dysplasia of the distal femur. The potential for non-target-mediated toxicity of PF-06439535 was evaluated in rats administered intravenous PF-06439535 (15 or 150 mg/kg/dose twice weekly for 15 days; total of five doses). Nonadverse higher liver weights and minimal sinusoidal cell hyperplasia were observed. Collectively, these studies demonstrated similarity of PF-06439535 to bevacizumab, supporting entry into clinical development.

Optimizing bevacizumab dosing in glioblastoma: less is more.

Compared to traditional chemotherapies, where dose limiting toxicities represent the maximum possible dose, monoclonal antibody therapies are used at doses well below maximum tolerated dose. However, there has been little effort to ascertain whether there is a submaximal dose at which the efficacy/complication ratio is maximized. Thus, despite the general practice of using Bevacizumab (BEV) at dosages of 10 mg/kg every other week for glioma patients, there has not been much prior work examining whether the relatively high complication rates reported with this agent can be decreased by lowering the dose without impairing efficacy. We assessed charts from 80 patients who received BEV for glioblastoma to survey the incidence of complications relative to BEV dose. All patients were treated with standard upfront chemoradiation. The toxicity was graded based on the NCI CTCAE, version 4.03. The rate of BEV serious related adverse events was 12.5% (n = 10/80). There were no serious adverse events (≥grade 3) when the administered dose was (<3 mg/kg/week), compared to a 21% incidence in those who received higher doses (≥3 mg/kg/week) (P < 0.01). Importantly, the three patient deaths attributable to BEV administration occurred in patients receiving higher doses. Patients who received lower doses also had a better survival rate, although this did not reach statistical significance [median OS 39 for low dose group vs. 17.3 for high dose group (P = 0.07)]. Lower rates of serious BEV related toxicities are noted when lower dosages are used without diminishing positive clinical impact. Further work aimed at optimizing BEV dosage is justified.

[Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for Her2-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials].

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for Her2-negative breast cancer.Methods: We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Database and the abstracts of major international conferences in recent 5 years to identify prospective randomized controlled clinical trials that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Study selection and analyses were undertaken according to the Cochrane Handbook. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.Results: Six trials were identified with 4440 eligible patients. The results of this meta-analysis showed that the rate of pathological complete response (pCR) was higher in Her-2 negative breast cancer patients receiving bevacizumab combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy than that in patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (24.7% vs 20.1%, RR=1.23, 95%CI:1.10-1.37, P<0.01). In addition, the pCR rate rose up when bevacizumab was added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy both in hormone receptor-positive patients (13.1% vs 10.2%,RR=1.28, 95%CI:1.04-1.58,P<0.05) and in hormone receptor-negative patients (46.3% vs 37.1%, RR=1.25, 95%CI:1.12-1.39, P<0.01). Statistical differences were observed in the rate of relevant adverse events such as hypertention (3.2% vs 0.6%, RR=5.292, 95%CI:2.933-9.549, P<0.01) and mucositis (10.5% vs 2.0%, RR=5.340, 95%CI:3.743-7.617, P<0.01) between the combination group and the chemotherapy alone group. Differences in other toxicities such as febrile neutropenia, infection, surgical complications, neutropenia and hand-foot syndrome were also found to be statistically significant between the combination group and the chemotherapy alone group (all P<0.05), while such difference was not found in the occurrence of peripheral neuropathy (P>0.05). Conclusion: The addition of bevacizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Her2-negative breast cancer can significantly improve pathological complete response, but may bring more grade 3 and 4 toxicities.More neoadjuvant trials need to be done to define subgroups of Her2-negative breast cancer that would have clinically significant long-term benefit from bevacizumab treatment.

Non-clinical pharmacology and toxicology studies of bevacizumab biosimilar LY01008.

LY01008 was a biosimilar of Avastin® developed by Shandong Boan Biotechnology. To support the clinical trial and marketing application of LY01008 as a biosimilar, a series of non-clinical pharmacodynamics (PD), pharmacokinetics (PK), and toxicological studies have been conducted. The PD study results showed that LY01008 had similar pharmacodynamic effects with Avastin in VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) binding activity, inhibitory effect on angiogenesis and vascular permeability, and anti-tumor activities in nude mouse models alone or combined with chemotherapeutic agents. PK study showed that LY01008 had similar PK parameters with Avastin at the same doses, and the relative bioavailability of LY01008 was 111.4%. The maximum tolerated dose of LY01008 in the single-dose toxicity study of cynomolgus monkeys was greater than 258 mg/kg. LY01008 had no effects on central nervous system, cardiovascular system and respiratory system in cynomolgus monkeys. LY01008 had no hemolytic effect in vitro and no local irritation in cynomolgus monkeys. The immunogenicity of LY01008 was no higher than that of Avastin in cynomolgus monkeys. In the one-month multiple-dose toxicity study in cynomolgus monkeys, the toxicokinetics profiles of LY01008 was similar with Avastin, the characteristics of the toxic reactions were the same and the extent was similar between LY01008 and Avastin, and no new toxic reactions were observed on LY01008. In conclusion, LY01008 had a good safety profile, and was biosimilar with Avastin in the comparative studies of pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, toxicokinetics and toxicology, which supported the clinical trial and marketing application of LY01008 as a biosimilar of Avastin.

Curcumin attenuates bevacizumab-induced toxicity via suppressing oxidative stress and preventing mitochondrial dysfunction in heart mitochondria.

Heart failure was subsequently noted in 2-4% of patients on bevacizumab (BEV). Whereas mitochondria play an important role in myocardial tissue homeostasis, deterioration in mitochondrial function will eventually lead to cardiomyocyte cell death and consequently cardiovascular dysfunction. Therefore, the aim of our study is to search the effects of BEV on isolated rat heart mitochondria and cardiomyocytes, and survey the effect of curcumin as a mitochondrial protective and cardioprotective agent. Rat heart mitochondria and cardiomyocytes were isolated from adult rat heart ventricular. By using biochemical and flow cytometry evaluations, the parameters of mitochondrial toxicity including succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) activity, mitochondrial swelling, mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) collapse, reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation and lipid peroxidation (LP), and cellular assays such as cytotoxicity and MMP collapse were evaluated. Results revealed that BEV (up to 50 µg/ml) induced a concentration- and time-dependent rise in mitochondrial ROS formation, MMP collapse, mitochondrial swelling, LP, and inhibition of SDH in rat heart mitochondria. Our results showed that curcumin (10-100 µM) significantly ameliorated BEV-induced mitochondrial toxicities. Also, our results in cellular assays confirmed amelioration effect of curcumin against BEV toxicity. These results indicate that the cardiotoxic effects of BEV are associated with mitochondrial dysfunction and ROS formation, which finally ends in MMP collapse and mitochondrial swelling as the "point of no return" in the cascade of events leading to apoptosis. Also, results of this study suggest that probably the combination therapy of BEV and curcumin could decrease mitochondrial effects of this drug.

A biocompatible reverse thermoresponsive polymer for ocular drug delivery.

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of vision loss, the treatment of which may require monthly intravitreal injections. This is a burden on patients and health services, and new delivery modalities that reduce injection frequency are required. To that end, we investigated the suitability of a novel reverse thermoresponsive polymer (RTP) as an ocular drug-delivery vehicle. In this work, we detail the structure and synthesis of a novel RTP, and determine drug release curves for two drugs commonly used in the treatment of AMD, bevacizumab and aflibercept. Biocompatibility of the RTP was assessed in vitro in human and rat cell lines and in vivo following intravitreal injection in rats. Bevacizumab demonstrated a more appropriate release profile than aflibercept, with 67% released within 14 days and 78% released in total over a 183-day period. No toxic effects of RTP were seen in human or rat cells in up to 14 days of co-culture with RTP. Following intravitreal injection, intraocular pressure was unaffected by the presence of RTP and no changes in retinal function or structure were observed at 1 week or 1 month post-injection. RTP injection did not cause inflammation, gliosis or apoptosis in the retina. This work demonstrates the potential suitability of the novel RTP as a sustained-release vehicle for ocular drug delivery for anti-neovascular therapies. Optimization of polymer chemistry for optimal drug loading and release is needed.

Effect of nanoencapsulation using poly (lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) on anti-angiogenic activity of bevacizumab for ocular angiogenesis therapy.

Antibody-based therapy is an effective strategy for treating ocular angiogenesis. However, short-acting efficacy and poor treatment compliance usually occurs in clinical practices. Thus, it is required to develop a drug delivery system to improve the bioavailability and decrease the toxicity of anti-angiogenic antibody. Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). In this study, bevacizumab was encapsulated into poly (lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) nanoparticles. PLGA encapsulation could prolong the residency of bevacizumab in the vitreous and aqueous humor and produce long-lasting drug concentrations. Bevacizumab-encapsulated PLGA had no significant cytotoxicity and tissue toxicity effect in vitro and in vivo. In vitro studies showed that bevacizumab-encapsulated PLGA was more effective than bevacizumab in inhibiting VEGF-mediated endothelial cell proliferation, migration and tube formation. In vivo studies showed that bevacizumab-encapsulated PLGA enhanced the anti-angiogenic efficiency of bevacizumab for treating corneal neovascularization and retinal neovascularization. Thus, bevacizumab-encapsulated PLGA could increase the bioavailability and decrease the toxicity of bevacizumab during ocular angiogenesis therapy.

Single- and repeated-dose toxicity study of bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept in ARPE-19 cells under normal and oxidative stress conditions.

We assessed the effect of single and repeated doses of bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept on cell viability, proliferation, permeability, and apoptosis of ARPE-19 cells. MTT and BrdU assays were used to determine viability and proliferation after single or repeated doses of anti-VEGF drugs under normal and oxidative stress conditions. Caspase-3 expression after single and repeated doses of the 3 drugs was assessed using immunofluorescence. Transepithelial-electrical-resistance (TER) was measured to study the effect of anti-VEGFs on retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) permeability under normal and oxidative stress conditions. Flow cytometry was used to detect intracellular accumulation of the drugs. Finally, a wound healing assay was performed to investigate the effect of the drugs on RPE cell migration. Single and multiple doses of anti-VEGF drugs had no effect on cell viability and proliferation. The oxidative effect of H2O2 decreased cell viability and proliferation; however, no difference was observed between anti-VEGF treatments. Immunofluorescence performed after single and repeated doses of the drugs revealed some caspase-3 expression. Interestingly, anti-VEGFs restored the increased permeability induced by H2O2. The 3 drugs accumulated inside the cells and were detectable 5 days after treatment. Finally, none of the drugs affected migration. In conclusion, no measureable toxic effect was observed after single or repeated doses of VEGF antagonists under normal and oxidative stress. Intracellular accumulation of the drugs does not seem to be toxic or affect cell functions. Our study suggests that anti-VEGFs could have a preventive effect on the maintenance of the RPE barrier under oxidative stress.