Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25183445

RESUMO

In order to ensure the quality of biomedical products, an experimental test for every single manufactured batch is required for many products. Especially in vaccine testing, animal experiments are traditionally used for this purpose. For example, efficacy is often determined via challenge experiments in laboratory animals. Safety tests of vaccine batches are also mostly performed using laboratory animals. However, many animal experiments have clear inherent disadvantages (low accuracy, questionable transferability to humans, unclear significance). Furthermore, for ethical reasons and animal welfare aspects animal experiments are also seen very critical by the public. Therefore, there is a strong trend towards replacing animal experiments with methods in which no animals are used ("replacement"). If a replacement is not possible, the required animal experiments should be improved in order to minimize the number of animals necessary ("reduction") and to reduce pain and suffering caused by the experiment to a minimum ("refinement"). This "3R concept" is meanwhile firmly established in legislature. In recent years many mandatory animal experiments have been replaced by alternative in vitro methods or improved according to the 3R principles; numerous alternative methods are currently under development. Nevertheless, the process from the development of a new method to its legal implementation takes a long time. Therefore, supplementary regulatory measures to facilitate validation and acceptance of new alternative methods could contribute to a faster and more consequent implementation of the 3R concept in the testing of biomedical products.


Assuntos
Alternativas aos Testes com Animais/ética , Alternativas aos Testes com Animais/legislação & jurisprudência , Bem-Estar do Animal/legislação & jurisprudência , Bioensaio/normas , Avaliação de Medicamentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Preparações Farmacêuticas/normas , Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados/normas , Alternativas aos Testes com Animais/normas , Bem-Estar do Animal/ética , Animais , Bioensaio/ética , Avaliação de Medicamentos/ética , Avaliação de Medicamentos/normas , Alemanha , Legislação de Medicamentos
2.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 54(3): 256-63, 2009 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19442698

RESUMO

To ensure the safety of Canada's shellfish, the Canadian Shellfish Sanitation Program (CSSP) relies on the mouse bioassay to detect toxins known to cause paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP). This assay uses a large number of mice and requires death as an endpoint. Canadian research has led to the development of a pre-column High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) method that is more sensitive and more reliable than the mouse bioassay. However, it is not being used by Canadian regulators despite its acceptance by the AOAC and adoption by the United Kingdom. An ethnography study of stakeholders in the CSSP was conducted to determine the opportunities and obstacles to adopting analytical testing methods. The results of the study indicate that the major obstacles are a lack of certified reference materials (CRMs) and the direction of resources towards the development of new instrument-based methods rather than towards the refinement of the existing pre-column HPLC method for regulatory use. To move away from the mouse bioassay, Canada should invest in: basic research to develop a complete set of CRMs for PSP toxins; method refinement to increase sample throughput; and exercises to gain international acceptance of the pre-column HPLC method.


Assuntos
Bioensaio/métodos , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Toxinas Marinhas/análise , Intoxicação por Frutos do Mar , Alternativas ao Uso de Animais , Animais , Bioensaio/ética , Canadá , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Monitoramento Ambiental/ética , Órgãos Governamentais , Camundongos , Opinião Pública
3.
J Ethnopharmacol ; 110(3): 391-400, 2007 Apr 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17317057

RESUMO

Although in vivo models give a more accurate reflection of the activity of substances used in traditional medicine, their use in many countries is severely restricted due to economic and ethical concerns, and this has resulted in the widespread use of in vitro tests in ethnopharmacological studies. Such tests are very useful where the identity of compounds responsible for the biological activity of an extract is being investigated and where limited supplies of material are available, but it is important to consider a variety of factors before making over-predictive claims of that activity in one particular system explains the traditional use. The use of only one bioassay gives a very incomplete picture of the effect of the extract on the whole system involved. A symptom may be due to a number of disease states and, consequently, a variety of mechanisms may serve as targets for bioassays. In a similar way, it is very unusual for there to be only one target for a particular disease so a variety of test systems must be employed. Examples are given of batteries of test systems used to test plants and other materials with a reputation of being useful in wound-healing, diabetes, cancer and to treat cognitive decline associated with old age. In addition, consideration must be given to factors such as absorption into the body and metabolism of any substances present, either to decrease or increase the effect of the 'actives'.


Assuntos
Bioensaio/métodos , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos/métodos , Etnofarmacologia/métodos , Plantas Medicinais , Bioensaio/ética , Etnofarmacologia/economia , Etnofarmacologia/ética , Medicina Tradicional , Modelos Biológicos , Fitoterapia , Extratos Vegetais
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA