Under-dosing and over-dosing of neuromuscular blocking drugs and reversal agents: beware of the risks.

The phenomena of residual curarisation and recurarisation after the use of long-acting non-depolarising neuromuscular blocking drugs such as tubocurarine and pancuronium were well recognised 60 years ago. But the incidence seemed to decline with the introduction of atracurium and vecuronium. However, recently there have been an increasing number of reports of residual and recurrent neuromuscular block. Some of these reports are a result of inappropriate doses of rocuronium, sugammadex or both, together with inadequate neuromuscular monitoring. We urge clinicians to review their practice to ensure the highest standards of clinical care when using neuromuscular blocking drugs and reversal agents. This includes the use of quantitative neuromuscular monitoring whenever neuromuscular blocking drugs are administered.

Analysis of the factors contributing to residual weakness after sugammadex administration in pediatric patients under 2 years of age.

BACKGROUND: Sugammadex reverses the neuromuscular blockade induced by rocuronium and vecuronium and is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use in patients aged over 2 years. There is, however, a paucity of data regarding its dosing profile in infants and children younger than 2 years. AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the risk of recurarization, or re-paralysis, in children under 2 years of age to increase awareness on the importance of appropriate neuromuscular blocked monitoring and reversal. METHODS: All patients aged ≤24 months who underwent an operative procedure at a tertiary medical center between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021, and received both rocuronium for neuromuscular blockade and sugammadex for neuromuscular blockade reversal, were identified in the electronic medical record. Patients were excluded from analysis if they (1) received vecuronium, cisatracurium, atracurium, or succinylcholine for neuromuscular blockade, (2) received neostigmine for reversal, or (3) underwent more than one operation within 24 h. We performed a survival analysis of sugammadex redose using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: We reviewed 2923 records. Sugammadex was redosed in 123 (4.2%) cases. The median [IQR] time to redose was 7 [4-17] min, and the median [IQR] amount of redose administered was 2.74 [1.96-3.99] mg/kg. Increasing patient age (p < .01) and weight (p < .01) were associated with reduced hazard rate of sugammadex redose. For a patient of median weight, increasing age from 3 to 13 months was associated with a 53% risk reduction (HR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.24-0.91). For a patient of median age, increasing weight from 4.7 to 9.2 kg was associated with 41% risk reduction (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.32-1.07). We failed to detect any other associations. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center, retrospective cohort study of pediatric surgery patients, there was an association between the hazard of sugammadex redose with both increased age and weight.

Extravascular injection of neuromuscular blocking drugs: A systematic review of current evidence and management.

Extravascular injection of neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs) can cause a neuromuscular block because of systemic absorption. Currently, there are no guidelines available on managing extravasation of NMBDs. This article reviews the available literature on extravasation of NMBDs. Medline and Embase databases were searched for studies concerning the paravenous or subcutaneous injection of NMBDs. Nine articles were included consisting of seven case reports, one case series and one clinical trial. Rocuronium was used as primary NMBD in nine cases, vecuronium in two cases and pancuronium in one case. Although there exists significant heterogeneity between the reported information in the included studies, the majority of the case reports describe a slower onset, with a median delay of 20 min and prolonged duration of the neuromuscular block. Nine patients had a residual neuromuscular block at the end of the surgery. Postoperative monitoring in the recovery room was prolonged (median time 4 h). Most studies suggest that the delay in NMBD onset and recovery is caused by the formation of a subcutaneous depot, from which the NMBD is slowly absorbed into the systemic circulation. According to the current literature, extravasation of NMBDs results in an unpredictable neuromuscular block. Strategies to prevent potentially harmful side effects, such as frequent train-of-four (TOF) monitoring, the use of NMBD reversal agents and prolonged length of stay in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU), should be considered. This article suggests a clinical pathway that can be used after extravascular injection of NMBDs.

Encapsulation Dynamics of Neuromuscular Blocking Drugs by Sugammadex.

BACKGROUND: The clinical actions of sugammadex have been well studied, but the detailed molecular mechanism of the drug encapsulation process has not been systematically documented. The hypothesis was that sugammadex would attract rocuronium and vecuronium via interaction with the sugammadex side-chain "tentacles," as previously suggested. METHODS: Computational molecular dynamics simulations were done to investigate docking of sugammadex with rocuronium and vecuronium. To validate these methods, strength of binding was assessed between sugammadex and a heterogeneous group of nine other drugs, the binding affinities of which have been experimentally determined. These observations hinted that high concentrations of unbound sugammadex could bind to propofol, potentially altering its pharmacokinetic profile. This was tested experimentally in in vitro cortical slices. RESULTS: Sugammadex encapsulation of rocuronium involved a sequential progression down a series of metastable states. After initially binding beside the sugammadex molecule (mean ± SD center-of-mass distance = 1.17 ± 0.13 nm), rocuronium then moved to the opposite side to that hypothesized, where it optimally aligned with the 16 hydroxyl groups (distance, 0.82 ± 0.04 nm) before entering the sugammadex cavity to achieve energetically stable encapsulation by approximately 120 ns (distance, 0.35 ± 0.12 nm). Vecuronium formed fewer hydrogen bonds with sugammadex than did rocuronium; hence, it was less avidly bound. For the other molecules, the computational results showed good agreement with the available experimental data, showing a clear bilogarithmic relation between the relative binding free energy and the association constant (R2 = 0.98). Weaker binding was manifest by periodic unbinding. The brain slice results confirmed the presence of a weak propofol-sugammadex interaction. CONCLUSIONS: Computational simulations demonstrate the dynamics of neuromuscular blocking drug encapsulation by sugammadex occurring from the opposite direction to that hypothesized and also how high concentrations of unbound sugammadex can potentially weakly bind to other drugs given during general anesthesia.

Efficacy and Safety of Cisatracurium Compared to Vecuronium for Neuromuscular Blockade in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

PURPOSE: Previous studies analyzing neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have evaluated the benefit of cisatracurium with conflicting results, and data evaluating other NMBAs remains limited. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of cisatracurium to vecuronium in ARDS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center, retrospective, propensity matched review of patients who received cisatracurium or vecuronium continuous infusions between October 1, 2017 and June 30, 2020 for ARDS was conducted. The primary endpoint was duration of mechanical ventilation. Secondary endpoints included change in PaO2/FiO2 ratio at 48 h, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital mortality, and ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS). Safety endpoints included newly developed myopathy, presence of bradycardia or hypotension, and newly developed barotrauma or volutrauma. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were included in each group. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint of ventilator days between cisatracurium and vecuronium groups (mean 15.9 vs. 20.5 days respectively; p = .2). No statistically significant differences were found in secondary endpoints of ICU mortality (51.7% vs. 51.7%) or length of stay (18.7 vs. 23.9 days, p = .19), hospital mortality (51.7% vs. 55.2%, p = .79) or length of stay (22 vs. 30.6 days, p = .08), or mean change in PaO2/FiO2 (29.8 vs. 36.6; p = .74). Statistically significant differences were not observed in safety endpoints of myopathy (37.9% vs. 37.9%), barotrauma or volutrauma (13.8% vs. 3.5%; p = .16), bradycardia (31% vs. 13.8%; p = .12), or hypotension (96.6% vs. 82.8%; p = .08). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were seen in efficacy or safety endpoints between cisatracurium or vecuronium groups, suggesting that vecuronium may be a safe alternative agent for neuromuscular blockade in ARDS. Results of this analysis warrant confirmation in a larger, randomized study.

Sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade in pediatric patients: Results from a phase IV randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Few randomized studies have assessed recovery from rocuronium- or vecuronium-induced moderate or deep neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex in pediatric participants. AIM: To assess sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade in pediatric participants. METHODS: This was a randomized, phase IV, active comparator-controlled, double-blind study. Participants aged 2 to <17 years, under moderate or deep neuromuscular blockade, were administered sugammadex (2 or 4 mg/kg) or neostigmine (50 µg/kg; for moderate neuromuscular blockade only). Predefined adverse events of clinical interest, including clinically relevant bradycardia, hypersensitivity, and anaphylaxis, were monitored. The primary efficacy endpoint was time to recovery to a train-of-four ratio of ≥0.9 in participants receiving sugammadex 2 mg/kg versus neostigmine for reversal of moderate neuromuscular blockade, analyzed by analysis of variance adjusted for neuromuscular blocking agent and age. RESULTS: Of 288 randomized participants, 272 completed the study and 276 were included in the analyses. Clinically relevant bradycardia was experienced by 2.0%, 1.6%, and 5.9% of participants in the sugammadex 2 mg/kg, sugammadex 4 mg/kg, and neostigmine groups, respectively. No hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis events were observed. Recovery to a train-of-four ratio of ≥0.9 with sugammadex 2 mg/kg was faster than neostigmine (1.6 min, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.0 vs. 7.5 min, 95% CI 5.6 to 10.0; p < .0001) and was comparable to sugammadex 4 mg/kg (2.0 min, 95% CI 1.8 to 2.3). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric participants recovered from rocuronium- or vecuronium-induced moderate neuromuscular blockade significantly faster with sugammadex 2 mg/kg than with neostigmine. Time to reversal of deep neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex 4 mg/kg was consistent with that of moderate neuromuscular blockade reversal. No meaningful differences in clinically relevant bradycardia, hypersensitivity, or anaphylaxis were seen with sugammadex vs neostigmine. These results support the use of sugammadex for reversal of moderate and deep rocuronium- and vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in patients aged 2 to <17 years. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03351608/EudraCT 2017-000692-92.

In vitro alteration on erythrocytes mechanical properties by propofol, remifentanil and vecuronium.

Several studies report flow disturbance and microcirculation disorders upon anesthesia treatment. These alterations are often related to blood rheology changes. In this work, it was attempted to make a detailed description of the alterations in erythrocyte mechanical properties by the action of propofol, remifentanil, and vecuronium. For this, an in vitro study was performed on red blood cell samples from healthy donors incubated with solutions of propofol (4 µg/mL whole blood), remifentanil (10 ng/mL plasma), and vecuronium (0.15 µg/mL plasma). Erythrocyte viscoelastic parameters were determined by octuplicate using a Reómetro Eritrocitario. Also, a Wilcoxon signed rank-test with Yates correction for continuity was performed to analyze the overall alteration in the mechanical properties of erythrocytes. Statistical analysis showed that the three studied anesthetics changed the erythrocyte mechanical properties at different parts of the membrane. These results would imply an interaction of these anesthetics with the erythrocyte membrane. Finally, this could conduce to alterations in microcirculation.

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) Model for the Severity Prediction of Drug-Induced Rhabdomyolysis by Using Random Forest.

Drug-induced rhabdomyolysis (DIR) is a rare and potentially life-threatening muscle injury that is characterized by low incidence and high risk. To our best knowledge, the performance of the current predictive models for the early detection of DIR is suboptimal because of the scarcity and dispersion of DIR cases. Therefore, on the basis of the curated drug information from the Drug-Induced Rhabdomyolysis Atlas (DIRA) database, we proposed a random forest (RF) model to predict the DIR severity of the marketed drugs. Compared with the state-of-art methods, our proposed model outperformed extreme gradient boosting, support vector machine, and logistic regression in distinguishing the Most-DIR concern drugs from the No-DIR concern drugs (Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) and recall rate of our model were 0.46 and 0.81, respectively). Our model was subsequently applied to predicting the potentially serious DIR for 1402 drugs, which were reported to cause DIR by the postmarketing DIR surveillance data in the FDA Spontaneous Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS). As a result, 62.7% (94) of drugs ranked in the top 150 drugs with the Most-DIR concerns in FAERS can be identified by our model. The top four drugs (odds ratio >30) including acepromazine, rapacuronium, oxyphenbutazone, and naringenin were correctly predicted by our model. In conclusion, the RF model can well predict the Most-DIR concern drug only based on the chemical structure information and can be a facilitated tool for early DIR detection.

Neuromuscular Blockade and Reversal Practice Variability in the Outpatient Setting: Insights From US Utilization Patterns.

BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular blockade (NMB) is a critical part of many surgical procedures. Data on practice patterns of NMB agents (NMBAs) and NMB reversal in recent years in the US ambulatory surgical care setting are limited. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of US adult outpatients was conducted using the Premier Healthcare Database. We describe anesthesia practice trends in NMB management and assess the association of patient, procedural, and site characteristics with NMB reversal approach using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Approximately 5.2 million outpatient surgical encounters involving NMB and 4.6 million involving rocuronium or vecuronium between January 2014 and June 2019 were included. Following the introduction of sugammadex to US clinical practice (~2016), there was an increased use of rocuronium or vecuronium and a decrease in succinylcholine alone. Before 2016, NMB was pharmacologically reversed with neostigmine in approximately two-thirds of outpatient encounters. Over time, active reversal increased; by 2019, 42.3% and 36.0% of encounters were reversed by neostigmine and sugammadex, respectively, with 21.7% undergoing spontaneous recovery. Choice of NMBA (rocuronium or vecuronium alone), time since 2016, obesity, peripheral vascular disease, and procedures on the digestive, ocular, and female genital systems (vs musculoskeletal procedures) were independently and positively associated with pharmacologic reversal (versus spontaneous reversal). Conversely, advanced age; Western geography; and cardiovascular, endocrine, hemic/lymphatic, respiratory, and ear, nose, and throat procedures were independently and negatively associated with pharmacologic reversal of NMB.Among pharmacologic reversals, time since 2016 was positively and independently associated with sugammadex compared with neostigmine (odds ratios [ORs], ranged from 1.8 in 2017 to 3.2, P < .0001 in 2019). Those administered rocuronium or vecuronium without succinylcholine, with increased age and history of certain comorbidities, and those undergoing ocular or respiratory procedures (compared with musculoskeletal) were positively associated with reversal with sugammadex and endocrine procedure negatively and independently associated with reversal with sugammadex. There was variability in the association of several factors with NMB reversal choices by geographic region, particularly in patients' race, ethnicity, and size of affiliated hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, active pharmacological reversal of NMB increased in US adult outpatients following the introduction of sugammadex, although there remains significant practice variability. The multifactorial relationship between patient-, procedural-, and environmental-level characteristics and NMB management is rapidly evolving. Additional research on how these anesthesia practice patterns may be impacted by the shift to the ambulatory care setting and how they may impact patient outcomes and health disparities is warranted.

A randomized trial evaluating the safety profile of sugammadex in high surgical risk ASA physical class 3 or 4 participants.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this randomized, double-blind trial was to evaluate the safety and tolerability profile, including cardiac safety, of sugammadex-mediated recovery from neuromuscular block in participants undergoing surgery who met the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Class 3 or 4 criteria. Specifically, this study assessed the impact of sugammadex on cardiac adverse events (AEs) and other prespecified AEs of clinical interest. METHODS: Participants meeting ASA Class 3 and 4 criteria were stratified by ASA Class and NMBA (rocuronium or vecuronium) then randomized to one of the following: 1) Moderate neuromuscular block, sugammadex 2 mg/kg; 2) Moderate neuromuscular block, neostigmine and glycopyrrolate (neostigmine/glycopyrrolate); 3) Deep neuromuscular block, sugammadex 4 mg/kg; 4) Deep neuromuscular block, sugammadex 16 mg/kg (rocuronium only). Primary endpoints included incidences of treatment-emergent (TE) sinus bradycardia, TE sinus tachycardia and other TE cardiac arrhythmias. RESULTS: Of 344 participants randomized, 331 received treatment (61% male, BMI 28.5 ± 5.3 kg/m2, age 69 ± 11 years). Incidence of TE sinus bradycardia was significantly lower in the sugammadex 2 mg/kg group vs neostigmine/glycopyrrolate. The incidence of TE sinus tachycardia was significantly lower in the sugammadex 2 and 4 mg/kg groups vs neostigmine/glycopyrrolate. No significant differences in other TE cardiac arrythmias were seen between sugammadex groups and neostigmine/glycopyrrolate. There were no cases of adjudicated anaphylaxis or hypersensitivity reactions in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with neostigmine/glycopyrrolate, incidence of TE sinus bradycardia was significantly lower with sugammadex 2 mg/kg and incidence of TE sinus tachycardia was significantly lower with sugammadex 2 mg/kg and 4 mg/kg. These results support the safety of sugammadex for reversing rocuronium- or vecuronium-induced moderate and deep neuromuscular block in ASA Class 3 or 4 participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03346057 .

Actual versus ideal body weight dosing of sugammadex in morbidly obese patients offers faster reversal of rocuronium- or vecuronium-induced deep or moderate neuromuscular block: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: This randomized, double-blind trial evaluated sugammadex-mediated recovery time from rocuronium- or vecuronium-induced moderate (M-) or deep (D-) neuromuscular block in morbidly obese adults dosed by actual (ABW) or ideal body weight (IBW). METHODS: Adults with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 were randomized to 1 of 5 groups: M-neuromuscular block, sugammadex 2 mg/kg ABW; M-neuromuscular block, sugammadex 2 mg/kg IBW; M-neuromuscular block, neostigmine 5 mg, and glycopyrrolate 1 mg; D-neuromuscular block, sugammadex 4 mg/kg ABW; or D-neuromuscular block, sugammadex 4 mg/kg IBW. Supramaximal train of four (TOF) stimulation of the ulnar nerve (TOF-watch SX®) monitored recovery. Primary endpoint was time to TOF ratio ≥ 0.9 for ABW and IBW groups pooled across neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA)/blocking depth, analyzed by log-rank test stratified for agent and depth. Prespecified safety outcomes included treatment-emergent bradycardia, tachycardia, and other arrhythmias, and adjudicated hypersensitivity and anaphylaxis. RESULTS: Of 207 patients randomized, 188 received treatment (28% male, BMI 47 ± 5.1 kg/m2, age 48 ± 13 years). Recovery was 1.5 min faster with ABW vs IBW dosing. The sugammadex 2 mg/kg groups recovered 9-fold faster [time 0.11-fold, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.14] than the neostigmine group. ABW (5.3%) and IBW (2.7%) groups had similar incidences of recovery time > 10 min (95% CI of difference: - 4.8 to 11.0%); 84% for neostigmine group. Re-curarization occurred in one patient each in the 2 mg/kg IBW and neostigmine groups. Prespecified safety outcomes occurred with similar incidences. CONCLUSIONS: ABW-based sugammadex dosing yields faster reversal without re-curarization, supporting ABW-based sugammadex dosing in the morbidly obese, irrespective of the depth of neuromuscular block or NMBA used. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered on November 17, 2017, at ClinicalTrials.gov under number NCT03346070 .

Sugammadex Administration in Pregnant Women and in Women of Reproductive Potential: A Narrative Review.

Since its clinical introduction in 2008, sugammadex has demonstrated a high degree of safety and superior effectiveness compared to neostigmine when used to antagonize muscle relaxation produced by steroid nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockers. This includes its use in special populations, such as the elderly, children over 2 years old, and patients with renal, hepatic, or lung disease. In contrast, clinical evidence guiding its use during pregnancy, in women of childbearing potential, and in lactating women, is sparse. An exception is administration at the end of surgery in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery (CD) with general anesthesia (GA), for whom effectiveness and safety evidence is rapidly accumulating. We review evidence regarding sugammadex rescue reversal shortly after high-dose rocuronium in cases of cannot intubate/cannot ventilate (CICV), the extent of placental transfer of maternally administered sugammadex, adverse fetal effects of sugammadex exposure, potential effects on maintenance of early pregnancy, and the extent of transfer to breast milk. Finally, many anesthesiologists appear to heed the manufacturer's warning regarding informing women of childbearing potential regarding the risk of hormone contraceptive failure after sugammadex exposure. We provide a medical ethics analysis of the ex post facto counseling commonly reported after sugammadex administration, which favors either preoperative discussion and shared decision making, or the decision by the physician to use neostigmine. This review highlights the disparity in evidence regarding sugammadex use in various contexts of female reproductive health, including current research gaps that prevent this population from sharing in the benefits of sugammadex enjoyed by most perioperative patients.

Erroneous neuraxial administration of neuromuscular blocking drugs: Clinical and human factors analysis.

BACKGROUND: Drug errors during neuraxial anaesthesia or analgesia are not well known. OBJECTIVES: To review the clinical consequences associated with incorrect administration of neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs) during spinal or epidural anaesthesia, and to investigate human factors and strategies available to help prevent such errors. DESIGN: A review of reports of neuraxial administration of NMBDs in humans. DATA SOURCES: Published reports of errors involving NMBDs. We searched the period between 1965 and 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Error reports in any language. Nonneuraxial drug errors were excluded. RESULTS: We identified 20 reports involving seven different NMBDs inadvertently administered via the epidural or intrathecal routes. All patients developed systemic neuromuscular junction blockade. Fourteen errors occurred while patients were awake. The onset of action was delayed following epidural rocuronium and suxamethonium. The duration of action was prolonged following epidural administration of vecuronium, pancuronium, cisatracrium and suxamethonium. Five patients required emergency airway interventions. Intrethecal gallamine caused convulsions and muscle spasms migrating up the body. Syringe swap was the primary cause for the majority of errors and perceptual errors were the most common. Implementation of recommendations could have prevented the errors. CONCLUSION: Following the epidural injection of NMBDs the effects are delayed and prolonged. There was no serious morbidity reported following neuraxial administration of the NMBDs used in current practice. Perceptual errors resulting in incorrect syringe choice were the commonest cause. Four measures can be introduced to reduce such errors.

Sugammadex: A Limited But Important Role in Emergency Medicine.

Sugammadex reverses neuromuscular blockade by the steroidal nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents rocuronium and vecuronium. In 2015, it was approved in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration for adult use. However, there are ongoing clinical trials investigating its use in the pediatric population. Before approval in adult use in the United States, several adverse effects were noted to occur in patients receiving sugammadex in clinical trials including prolonged QT interval, bradycardia, hypersensitivity reactions, and prolongation of coagulation parameters. Additional investigations further elucidated the risks of these adverse events. Sugammadex is approved for use in children older than 2 years in other countries in Europe and Asia. Investigations suggest that the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic profile is similar in children when compared with adults. Published pediatric data favor the use of sugammadex in children older than 2 years, but there are some data in young children younger than 2 years. Case reports discuss the use of sugammadex in pediatric patients with neuromuscular diseases. Although sugammadex is typically used in the operating room for reversing neuromuscular blockade for surgical procedures, there is a small but important role for sugammadex use in the emergency department. In cases where rapid neurological examination is required after neuromuscular blockage with rocuronium or vecuronium, sugammadex can assist in facilitating a timely comprehensive neurological examination where pharmacologic or surgical management may depend on examination findings such as in the case of cerebral vascular accident, status epilepticus, or traumatic brain injury. Some clinicians have advocated for the use of sugammadex in the cannot intubate, cannot ventilate scenario. However, caution should be exercised in this situation as reversal of paralysis can take up to 22 minutes to occur.

The Effects of Postoperative Residual Neuromuscular Blockade on Hospital Costs and Intensive Care Unit Admission: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade continues to be a frequent occurrence with a reported incidence rate of up to 64%. However, the effect of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade on health care utilization remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to investigate the effects of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade on hospital costs (primary outcome), intensive care unit admission rate, and hospital length of stay (secondary outcomes). METHODS: We performed a prespecified secondary analysis of data obtained in 2233 adult patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia. Postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade was defined as a train-of-four ratio <0.9 in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Our confounder model adjusted for a variety of patient, surgical, and anesthesia-related factors. We fitted truncated negative binomial regression models for hospital cost and hospital length of stay analyses and a logistic regression model for our intensive care unit admission analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 457 (20.5%) patients in our cohort had residual neuromuscular blockade on admission to the PACU. Postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade was not independently associated with increased hospital costs (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.04, CI, 0.98-1.11; P = .22). There were significantly higher odds of intensive care unit admission in those with postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade compared to those without (adjusted odds ratio, 3.03, CI, 1.33-6.87; P < .01). Further, we found a trend toward increased hospital length of stay in patients with postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.09; P = .06). Sensitivity analysis using the same model in the day of surgery admissions and ambulatory surgery confirmed our findings. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade at PACU admission was not significantly associated with increased hospital costs, but was associated with higher rates of intensive care unit admission. These findings support the view that clinicians should continue to work to reduce the rate of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade.

An Observational Study of the Efficacy of Cisatracurium Compared with Vecuronium in Patients with or at Risk for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

RATIONALE: The neuromuscular blocking agent cisatracurium may improve mortality for patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Other neuromuscular blocking agents, such as vecuronium, are commonly used and have different mechanisms of action, side effects, cost, and availability in the setting of drug shortages. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether cisatracurium is associated with improved outcomes when compared with vecuronium in patients at risk for and with ARDS. METHODS: Using a nationally representative database, patients who were admitted to the ICU with a diagnosis of ARDS or an ARDS risk factor, received mechanical ventilation, and were treated with a continuous infusion of neuromuscular blocking agent for at least 2 days within 2 days of hospital admission were included. Patients were stratified into two groups: those who received cisatracurium or vecuronium. Propensity matching was used to balance both patient- and hospital-specific factors. Outcomes included hospital mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital duration, and discharge location. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Propensity matching successfully balanced all covariates for 3,802 patients (1,901 per group). There was no significant difference in mortality (odds ratio, 0.932; P = 0.40) or hospital days (-0.66 d; P = 0.411) between groups. However, patients treated with cisatracurium had fewer ventilator days (-1.01 d; P = 0.005) and ICU days (-0.98 d; P = 0.028) but were equally likely to be discharged home (odds ratio, 1.19; P = 0.056). CONCLUSIONS: When compared with vecuronium, cisatracurium was not associated with a difference in mortality but was associated with improvements in other clinically important outcomes. These data suggest that cisatracurium may be the preferred neuromuscular blocking agent for patients at risk for and with ARDS.

Investigation of intraoperative dosing patterns of neuromuscular blocking agents.

There is a growing body of literature documenting the use of deep neuromuscular block (NMB) during surgery. Traditional definitions of depth of NMB rely on train-of-four assessment, which can be less reliable in retrospective studies. The goal of our study was to investigate the real-world practice pattern of dosing of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA), utilizing the amount of NMBA used during the course of a case, adjusted for patient weight and case duration, as a surrogate measure of depth of NMB. We also aimed to identify case factors associated with larger NMBA doses. In this retrospective observational analysis of our anesthesia information management system, we analyzed all general endotracheal anesthesia cases from 2012 to 2015 in which an intermediate-acting NMBA was used. Cases using a long-acting NMBA or only succinylcholine were excluded. The expected duration of the case was calculated based on the cumulative dose of NMB used, normalized to the patient's ideal body weight and the ED95 of the drug. If the expected duration of the case was greater than the actual case duration documented in the case record, it was classified as higher dosing (HD). If the expected duration was equal to or less than the actual duration, it was considered predicted dosing (PD). Categorical comparisons between HD and PD groups were made for various patient, procedural, and provider factors. 72,684 cases were included in the final analysis, of which 46,358, or 64% of cases, used HD. Cases with patients who were morbidly obese, younger than 65 years, and who were lower ASA Physical Status classification (I or II) used more HD as opposed to PD. Cases that were non-open, used total intravenous anesthesia, emergent cases, or used non-rapid sequence anesthesia induction had higher rates of HD than their matched counterparts. All results were statistically significant. HD was more common in cases that documented train-of-four and used the reversal agent neostigmine. Approximately two-thirds of general endotracheal anesthesia cases using an intermediate-acting NMBA used HD. Cases with higher rates of HD may be those that are traditionally technically complex or emergent, would benefit from greater paralysis, or do not use adjunctive medications for muscle relaxation. Age greater than 65 years was shown to have lower rates of HD, likely due to provider awareness of age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Intraoperative monitoring and NMB antagonism with neostigmine were used more frequently with HD.

Practice Change From Intermittent Medication Boluses to Bolusing From a Continuous Infusion in Pediatric Critical Care: A Quality Improvement Project.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether implementing a guideline to bolus medications from continuous infusions in PICUs affects nursing satisfaction, patient safety, central line entries, medication utilization, or cost. DESIGN: This is a pre- and postimplementation quality improvement study. SETTING: An 11-bed ICU and 14-bed cardiac ICU in a university-affiliated children's hospital. PATIENTS: Patients less than 18 years old admitted to the PICU or pediatric cardiac ICU receiving a continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine, midazolam, fentanyl, morphine, vecuronium, or cisatracurium from May 2015 to May 2016, excluding November 2015 (washout period), were eligible for inclusion. INTERVENTIONS: Change in practice from administering bolus doses from an automated dispensing machine to administering bolus medications from continuous infusion in PICUs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Timing studies were conducted pre- and post implementation in 29 and 26 occurrences, respectively. The median time from the decision to give a bolus until it began infusing decreased by 169 seconds (p < 0.01). Nursing satisfaction increased from 19.3% pre- to 100% post implementation. Safety was assessed via barcode scanning compliance, which decreased by 1.4% for patients and 1% for medications, and smart pump limit overrides. The percentage of infusion pump bolus overrides increased as expected, with the majority (99%) of these exceeding soft maximum limits by less than two-fold. Central line entries were unaffected post implementation. To assess medication utilization, a total of 50 patients in each intervention group were selected for retrospective chart review. Daily fentanyl boluses increased from one to three (p = 0.021). However, midazolam infusion dose and fentanyl infusion duration decreased (p = 0.026 and p = 0.005, respectively). Medication utilization was otherwise unchanged post implementation (p > 0.05). Annualized cost avoidance was $124,160. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of bolus medications from continuous infusion in PICUs significantly decreased time to begin a bolus dose and increased nursing satisfaction. The practice change also improved medication utilization without negatively impacting patient safety.

Is lower-dose sugammadex a cost-saving strategy for reversal of deep neuromuscular block? Facts and fiction.

BACKGROUND: Sugammadex, a γ-cyclodextrin derivative, belongs to a new class of selective relaxant binding agents. Sugammadex was approved 10-years ago by the European medicines agency and today is used in clinical anesthesia and emergency medicine globally. In this review, indications for neuromuscular block, the challenge of neuromuscular monitoring and the practice of under-dosing of sugammadex as a potential cost-saving strategy are discussed. MAIN BODY: Reversal of neuromuscular block is important to accelerate the spontaneous recovery of neuromuscular function. Sugammadex is able to reverse a rocuronium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block rapidly and efficiently from every depth of neuromuscular block. However, since sugammadex was introduced in clinical anesthesia, several studies have reported administration of a lower-than-recommended dose of sugammadex. The decision to under-dose sugammadex is often motivated by cost reduction concerns, as the price of sugammadex is much higher than that of neostigmine outside the United States. However, under-dosing of sugammadex leads to an increased risk of recurrence of neuromuscular block after an initial successful (but transient) reversal. Similarly, when not using objective neuromuscular monitoring, under-dosing of sugammadex may result in residual neuromuscular block in the postoperative care unit, with its attendant negative pulmonary outcomes. Therefore, an appropriate dose of sugammadex, based on objective determination of the depth of neuromuscular block, should be administered to avoid residual or recurrent neuromuscular block and attendant postoperative complications. Whether the reduction in perioperative recovery time of the patient can be translated into additional procedural cases performed, faster operative turnover times, or improved organizational resource utilization, has yet to be determined in actual clinical practice that includes verification of neuromuscular recovery prior to tracheal extubation. CONCLUSIONS: The current review addresses the indications for neuromuscular block, the challenge of neuromuscular monitoring, the practice of under-dosing of sugammadex as a potential cost-saving strategy in reversal of deep neuromuscular block, the economics of sugammadex administration and the potential healthcare cost-saving strategies.

Nitrous oxide added at the end of isoflurane anesthesia hastens early recovery without increasing the risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Nitrous oxide (N2O) has been reported to increase the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in a dose-dependent manner. We investigated the effect of adding N2O at the end of isoflurane inhalational anesthesia on the recovery and incidence of PONV. Our hypothesis was that N2O would reduce the time to early recovery without increasing the incidence of PONV. METHODS: After obtaining ethics committee approval and written informed consent, 100 women at American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III and scheduled for laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy were randomized into two groups (G) according to the carrier gas: GO2 (air in 30% oxygen) and GN2O (the same mixture until the last 30 min of surgery, when 70% N2O in 30% oxygen was used). No PONV prophylaxis was given. Anesthesia was induced with thiopental 5 mg·kg-1, vecuronium 0.1 mg·kg-1, and fentanyl 1-2 µg·kg-1 iv and maintained with isoflurane. Indicators of early recovery (time to extubation, eye opening, following commands, orientation) were assessed by an anesthesiologist unaware of the group assignment. The incidence and severity of PONV was measured at two and 24 hr postoperatively. RESULTS: Altogether, 82 participants completed the study (42 in GO2, 40 in GN2O) and were analyzed. The mean (SD) time of N2O administration in GN2O patients was 27.1 (10.1) min. The mean (SD) time to extubation was faster in GN2O patients [5.4 (2.9) min] than in GO2 patients [7.5 (3.7) min] (mean difference, 2.0 min; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6 to 3.4, P = 0.009). The ability to open eyes, follow commands, and being oriented were all faster in GN2O patients than in GO2 patients (differences of 3.9 min, 95% CI, 1.6 to 6.1, P = 0.001; 3.4 min, 95% CI, 1.0 to 5.7, P = 0.006; 3.8 min, 95% CI, 0.9 to 6.7, P = 0.010, respectively). The incidence of PONV was not different between the groups, but the rescue antiemetic was required less often in the GN2O patients (mean difference in metoclopramide dose between the GN2O and GO2 groups, 5.1 mg; 95% CI, 0.8 to 9.4, P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Adding N2O during the last 30 min of an isoflurane-based inhalational anesthetic reduced the time to extubation, eye opening, and orientation.