A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Bumetanide in Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Acting on the main target of dopaminergic cells, the striatal γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic cells, might be a new way to treat persons with Parkinson's disease (PD). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of bumetanide, an Na-K-Cl cotransporter (NKCC1) inhibitor, to improve motor symptoms in PD. METHODS: This was a 4-month double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial of 1.75 to 3 mg/day bumetanide as an adjunct to levodopa in 44 participants with PD and motor fluctuations. RESULTS: Compared to the baseline, the mean change in OFF Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III score after 4 months of treatment (primary endpoint) did not improve significantly compared with placebo. No changes between participants treated with bumetanide and those treated with placebo were observed for most other outcome measures. Despite no relevant safety signals, bumetanide was poorly tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence in this study that bumetanide has efficacy in improving motor symptoms of PD. © 2024 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Crossover randomized controlled trial of bumetanide to rescue an attack of exercise induced hand weakness in hypokalaemic periodic paralysis.

The aim of this study was to establish whether bumetanide can abort an acute attack of weakness in patients with HypoPP. This was a randomised, double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled phase II clinical trial. Focal attack of weakness was induced by isometric exercise of ADM followed by rest (McManis protocol). Participants had two study visits and received either placebo or 2 mg bumetanide at attack onset (defined as 40 % decrement in the abductor digiti minimi CMAP amplitude from peak). CMAP measurements assessed attack severity and duration. Nine participants completed both visits. CMAP percentage of peak amplitudes in the bumetanide (40.6 %) versus placebo (34.9 %) group at 1hr following treatment did not differ significantly (estimated effect difference 5.9 % (95 % CI: (-5.7 %; 17.5 %), p = 0.27, primary outcome). CMAP amplitudes assessed by the area under the curve for early (0-2hr post-treatment) and late (2-4 h post-treatment) efficacy were not statistically different between bumetanide and placebo (early effect estimate 0.043, p = 0.3; late effect estimate 0.085, p = 0.1). Two participants recovered from the attack following bumetanide intake; none recovered following placebo. Bumetanide was well tolerated but not efficacious to rescue a focal attack in an immobilised hand in the majority of patients, although data supports further studies of this agent.

Comparative Effect of Loop Diuretic Prescription on Mortality and Heart Failure Readmission.

Loop diuretics are a standard pharmacologic therapy in heart failure (HF) management. Although furosemide is most frequently used, torsemide and bumetanide are increasingly prescribed in clinical practice, possibly because of superior bioavailability. Few real-world comparative effectiveness studies have examined outcomes across all 3 loop diuretics. The study goal was to compare the effects of loop diuretic prescribing at HF hospitalization discharge on mortality and HF readmission. We identified patients in Medicare claims data initiating furosemide, torsemide, or bumetanide after an index HF hospitalization from 2007 to 2017. We estimated 6-month risks of all-cause mortality and a composite outcome (HF readmission or all-cause mortality) using inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for relevant confounders. We identified 62,632 furosemide, 1,720 torsemide, and 2,389 bumetanide initiators. The 6-month adjusted all-cause mortality risk was lowest for torsemide (13.2%), followed by furosemide (14.5%) and bumetanide (15.6%). The 6-month composite outcome risk was 21.4% for torsemide, 24.7% for furosemide, and 24.9% for bumetanide. Compared with furosemide, the 6-month all-cause mortality risk was 1.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.7, 1.0) lower for torsemide and 1.0% (95% CI: -1.2, 3.2) higher for bumetanide, and the 6-month composite outcome risk was 3.3% (95% CI: -6.3, -0.3) lower for torsemide and 0.2% (95% CI: -2.5, 2.9) higher for bumetanide. In conclusion, the findings suggested that the first prescribed loop diuretic following HF hospitalization is associated with clinically important differences in morbidity in older patients receiving torsemide, bumetanide, or furosemide. These differences were consistent for the effect of all-cause mortality alone, but were not statistically significant.

Efficacy of bumetanide in animal models of ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis aimed to describe the efficacy of bumetanide in improving infarct volume, brain edema, and behavioral outcomes in animal models of cerebral ischemia. Embase, PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched from their inception to February 2024 (INPLASY:202430023). Data on the animal species, stroke model, drug dose, time of treatment, method of administration, study quality, and outcomes were extracted and pooled in a meta-analysis. The combined standardized mean difference (SMD) or mean difference (MD) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random- or fixed-effects models. Thirteen eligible studies involving >200 animals fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. Meta-analyses demonstrated that bumetanide treatment significantly reduced cerebral infarct volume (SMD: -0.42; 95% CI: -0.75, -0.09; p < 0.01; n = 186 animals) and consistently relieved brain edema (SMD: -1.39; 95% CI: -2.06, -0.72; p < 0.01; n = 64 animals). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that bumetanide treatment reduced infarct volume in transient but not permanent cerebral ischemia models. When administered after the stroke, it was more effective than treatment initiation before the stroke. Eight studies assessed the effect of bumetanide on behavioral function and the results showed that bumetanide treatment significantly improved neurobehavioral deficits (SMD: -2.35; 95% CI: -2.72, -1.97; p < 0.01; n = 250 animals). We conclude that bumetanide appears to be effective in reducing infarct volume and brain edema and improving behavioral recovery in animal models of cerebral ischemia. This mechanism needs to be confirmed through further investigation.

Efecto de la bumetanida en pacientes con hipertensión leve y moderada / Bumetanide effects in mild and moderate hypertensive patients

Se realizó un estudio de ocho semanas con el nuevo diurético bumetanida a la dosis de 1 mg/día, en una sola toma, en pacientes con hipertensión leve y moderada. La presión arterial se redujo de 163/102 mmHg a 140/88 mmHg en posición supina y de 149/102 mmHg a 137/87 mmHg en posición de pie. No hubo alteraciones significativas en la frecuencia cardíaca. La tolerancia fue excelente. Se concluye que la bumetanida es una droga efectiva en el tratamiento de la hipertensión leve y moderada