The effect of a dermoscopy training programme on diagnostic accuracy and management decisions regarding pigmented skin lesions: a comparison between dermal therapists and general practitioners.

BACKGROUND: Dermoscopy is known to increase the diagnostic accuracy of pigmented skin lesions (PSLs) when used by trained professionals. The effect of dermoscopy training on the diagnostic ability of dermal therapists (DTs) has not been studied so far. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate whether DTs, in comparison with general practitioners (GPs), benefited from a training programme including dermoscopy, in both their ability to differentiate between different forms of PSL and to assign the correct therapeutic strategy. METHODS: In total, 24 DTs and 96 GPs attended a training programme on PSLs. Diagnostic skills as well as therapeutic strategy were assessed, prior to the training (pretest) and after the training (post-test) using clinical images alone, as well as after the addition of dermatoscopic images (integrated post-test). Bayesian hypothesis testing was used to determine statistical significance of differences between pretest, post-test and integrated post-test scores. RESULTS: Both the DTs and the GPs demonstrated benefit from the training: at the integrated post-test, the median proportion of correctly diagnosed PSLs was 73% (range 30-90) for GPs and 63% (range 27-80) for DTs. A statistically significant difference between pretest results and integrated test results was seen, with a Bayes factor > 100. At 12 percentage points higher, the GPs outperformed DTs in the accuracy of detecting PSLs. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that a training programme focusing on PSLs while including dermoscopy positively impacts detection of PSLs by DTs and GPs. This training programme could form an integral part of the training of DTs in screening procedures, although additional research is needed.

Using content-based image retrieval of dermoscopic images for interpretation and education: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Dermoscopic content-based image retrieval (CBIR) systems provide a set of visually similar dermoscopic (magnified and illuminated) skin images with a pathology-confirmed diagnosis for a given dermoscopic query image of a skin lesion. Although recent advances in machine learning have spurred novel CBIR algorithms, we have few insights into how end users interact with CBIRs and to what extent CBIRs can be useful for education and image interpretation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed an interactive user interface for a CBIR system with dermoscopic images as a decision support tool and investigated users' interactions and decisions with the system. We performed a pilot experiment with 14 non-medically trained users for a given set of annotated dermoscopic images. RESULTS: Our pilot showed that the number of correct classifications and users' confidence levels significantly increased with the CBIR interface compared with a non-CBIR interface, although the timing also increased significantly. The users found the CBIR interface of high educational value, engaging and easy to use. CONCLUSION: Overall, users became more accurate, found the CBIR approach provided a useful decision aid, and had educational value for learning about skin conditions.

Educational and practice gaps in the management of volar melanocytic lesions.

BACKGROUND: The benign and malignant patterns of acral melanocytic naevi (AMN) and acral melanomas (AM) have been defined in a series of retrospective studies. A three-step algorithm was developed to determine when to biopsy acral melanocytic lesions. This algorithm has only been applied to a Japanese population. OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to review the current management strategy of acral melanocytic lesions and to investigate the utility of the three-step algorithm in a predominately Caucasian cohort. METHODS: A retrospective search of the pathology and image databases at Mayo Clinic was performed between the years 2006 and 2016. Only cases located on a volar surface with dermoscopic images were included. Two dermatologists reviewed all dermoscopic images and assigned a global dermoscopic pattern. Clinical and follow-up data were gathered by chart review. All lesions with known diameter and pathological diagnosis were used for the three-step algorithm. RESULTS: Regular fibrillar and ridge patterns were more likely to be biopsied (P = 0.01). The majority of AMN (58.1%) and AM (60%) biopsied were due to physician-deemed concerning dermoscopic patterns. 39.2% of these cases were parallel furrow, lattice-like or regular fibrillar. When patients were asked to follow-up within a 3- to 6-month period, only 16.7% of the patients returned within that interval. The three-step algorithm would have correctly identified four of five AM for biopsy, missing a 6 mm, multicomponent, invasive melanoma. CONCLUSION: We found one major educational gap in the recognition of low-risk lesions with high rates of biopsy of the fibrillary pattern. Recognizing low-risk dermoscopic patterns could reduce the rate of biopsy of AMN by 23.3%. We identified two major practice gaps, poor patient compliance with follow-up and the potential insensitivity of the three-step algorithm to small multicomponent acral melanocytic lesions.

The status of dermoscopy in Germany - results of the cross-sectional Pan-Euro-Dermoscopy Study.

BACKGROUND: Survey on the current status of dermoscopy in Germany. METHODS: In the context of a pan-European internet-based study (n = 7,480) conducted by the International Dermoscopy Society, 880 German dermatologists were asked to answer questions with respect to their level of training as well as their use and perceived benefit of dermoscopy. RESULTS: Seven hundred and sixty-two (86.6 %) participants practiced dermatology in a publicly funded health care setting; 98.4 % used a dermoscope in routine clinical practice. About 93 % (n = 814) stated to have had more than five years of experience in the use of dermoscopy. Dermoscopy was considered useful in the diagnosis of melanoma by 93.6 % (n = 824); for pigmented skin tumors, by 92.4 % (n = 813); in the follow-up of melanocytic lesions, by 88.6 % (n = 780); for non-pigmented lesions, by 71.4 % (n = 628), in the follow-up of non-melanocytic lesions, by 52.7 % (n = 464); and for inflammatory skin lesions, by 28.5 % (n = 251). Overall, 86.5 % (n = 761) of participants felt that - compared to naked-eye examination - dermoscopy increased the number of melanomas diagnosed; 77,7 % (n = 684) considered the number of unnecessary excisions of benign lesions to be decreased. Participants who personally felt that dermoscopy improved their ability to diagnose melanoma were significantly i) younger, ii) had been practicing dermatology for a shorter period of time, iii) were less commonly employed by an university-affiliated dermatology department, iv) were more frequently working in an office-based public health care setting, and v) had more frequently been trained in dermoscopy during their dermatology residency. CONCLUSIONS: The findings presented herein ought to be integrated into future residency and continuing medical education programs with the challenge to improve dermato-oncological care and to expand the diagnostic spectrum of dermoscopy to include inflammatory skin diseases.

Integration of capillary microscopy and dermoscopy into the rheumatology fellow curriculum.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates a novel, three-part nailfold capillaroscopy training curriculum for adult and paediatric rheumatology fellows. METHODS: All rheumatology fellows training at an academic medical centre took part in the three-part nailfold capillaroscopy curriculum. Tests of fellows' usage, interest, confidence, and ability in nailfold capillaroscopy were taken at multiple time-points throughout the curriculum. RESULTS: Fellows self-reported high levels of interest, increased confidence in delineating normal and abnormal nailfold capillaries (p=0.03) and increased usage of nailfold capillaroscopy (p=0.09). The ability of fellows to identify normal nailfold capillaries (p=0.03) and systemic sclerosis-specific nailfold capillary changes, such as neoangiogenesis (p<0.001), also increased. CONCLUSIONS: The curriculum was feasible and led to improved ability of learners to distinguish normal from abnormal and to recognise and describe systemic sclerosis-specific nailfold capillary changes. This curriculum also led to improved confidence in examining nailfold capillaries and increased usage of this skill in rheumatologic consultation.

Teaching dermatoscopy of pigmented skin tumours to novices: comparison of analytic vs. heuristic approach.

BACKGROUND: There are two strategies to approach the dermatoscopic diagnosis of pigmented skin tumours, namely the verbal-based analytic and the more visual-global heuristic method. It is not known if one or the other is more efficient in teaching dermatoscopy. OBJECTIVE: To compare two teaching methods in short-term training of dermatoscopy to medical students. METHODS: Fifty-seven medical students in the last year of the curriculum were given a 1-h lecture of either the heuristic- or the analytic-based teaching of dermatoscopy. Before and after this session, they were shown the same 50 lesions and asked to diagnose them and rate for chance of malignancy. Test lesions consisted of melanomas, basal cell carcinomas, nevi, seborrhoeic keratoses, benign vascular tumours and dermatofibromas. Performance measures were diagnostic accuracy regarding malignancy as measured by the area under the curves of receiver operating curves (range: 0-1), as well as per cent correct diagnoses (range: 0-100%). RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy as well as per cent correct diagnoses increased by +0.21 and +32.9% (heuristic teaching) and +0.19 and +35.7% (analytic teaching) respectively (P for all <0.001). Neither for diagnostic accuracy (P = 0.585), nor for per cent correct diagnoses (P = 0.298) was a difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term training of dermatoscopy to medical students allows significant improvement in diagnostic abilities. Choosing a heuristic or analytic method does not have an influence on this effect in short training using common pigmented skin lesions.

A short dermoscopy training increases diagnostic performance in both inexperienced and experienced dermatologists.

Dermoscopy is a clinical tool known to improve the early detection of melanoma and other malignancies of the skin, but only for experienced users. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of short (3-hour) dermoscopy training sessions in both residents and practicing dermatologists. The training improved diagnostic accuracy for both melanocytic and nonmelanocytic neoplasms of the skin and the observed effect was the highest for residents but was also significant for more experienced practicing dermatologists.

Dermoscopy use in the next generation: a survey of Australian dermatology trainees.

OBJECTIVES: The use of dermoscopy is rapidly expanding. The dermatoscope is now used in everyday practice. We sought to investigate the use of dermoscopy by Australian dermatology trainees. METHODS: An invitation to complete a web-based survey was sent via e-mail. The survey was composed of a combination of questions from a standardised survey of the International Dermoscopy Society, a previously published dermoscopy survey of Australian consultant dermatologists and questions posed by us. Two-sided Fisher's exact tests, χ(2) tests and exact χ(2) tests for trend were used to assess differences between Australian consultants (n = 99) and trainee dermatologists (n = 44). RESULTS: The response rate was 55% (44/80 trainees). There were 32% (n = 14) male and 68% (n = 30) female respondents. The mean age was 33-years (SD = 5.41). All respondents used dermoscopy with most (55%, n = 24) having used a dermatoscope for 3-5 years. When asked whether a dermatoscope was an essential tool for a trainee dermatologist, 96% (n = 42) responded yes. There was a statistically significant difference in answers of consultants and trainees to questions on identifying melanomas early in the curable stage, the use of dermoscopy in non-pigmented tumours, helping to improve record-keeping, documentation for medical liability and anticipation for future use of dermoscopy (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This survey of trainee dermatologists compared the dermoscopy practices recorded in a previous publication involving consultant dermatologists, in addition to questions asked by us. We outline what the practices of dermoscopy use could be in the next generation of dermatologists in Australia.

Understanding visual search patterns of dermatologists assessing pigmented skin lesions before and after online training.

The goal of this investigation was to explore the feasibility of characterizing the visual search characteristics of dermatologists evaluating images corresponding to single pigmented skin lesions (PSLs) (close-ups and dermoscopy) as a venue to improve training programs for dermoscopy. Two Board-certified dermatologists and two dermatology residents participated in a phased study. In phase I, they viewed a series of 20 PSL cases ranging from benign nevi to melanoma. The close-up and dermoscopy images of the PSL were evaluated sequentially and rated individually as benign or malignant, while eye position was recorded. Subsequently, the participating subjects completed an online dermoscopy training module that included a pre- and post-test assessing their dermoscopy skills (phase 2). Three months later, the subjects repeated their assessment on the 20 PSLs presented during phase I of the study. Significant differences in viewing time and eye-position parameters were observed as a function of level of expertise. Dermatologists overall have more efficient search than residents generating fewer fixations with shorter dwells. Fixations and dwells associated with decisions changing from benign to malignant or vice versa from photo to dermatoscopic viewing were longer than any other decision, indicating increased visual processing for those decisions. These differences in visual search may have implications for developing tools to teach dermatologists and residents about how to better utilize dermoscopy in clinical practice.

Utility of Dermoscopy Training in Improving Diagnostic Accuracy of Skin Lesions Among Physician Assistant Students.

INTRODUCTION: Patients often first present to their primary care provider for skin lesion concerns, and dermoscopy is a tool that enhances diagnostic acumen of both malignant and benign skin lesions. Physician assistants (PAs) frequently serve as primary care and dermatology providers, but to our knowledge, no current research on dermoscopy expertise with PAs exists. We hypothesize that PA students could be taught dermoscopy based on the triage amalgamated dermoscopic algorithm (TADA) to increase their diagnostic skill, as previously shown with medical students. METHODS: Dermoscopy was taught to first-year PA students at all 5 PA programs in the state of Minnesota. The training was 50 minutes in length and focused on the fundamentals of the TADA method. Physician assistant students participated in a pretraining and post-training test, consisting of 30 dermoscopic images. RESULTS: A total of 139/151 (92%) PA students completed both the pretraining and post-training tests. Overall, mean scores for all students increased significantly ( P < .0001) after dermoscopy training was given (18.5 ± 7.1 vs. 23.8 ± 6.7). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that after TADA training, PA students improved their ability to assess dermoscopy images of both skin cancer and benign lesions accurately, suggesting that PAs can be trained as novice dermoscopists and provide better dermatologic care to patients. We strongly encourage integration of dermoscopy into didactic education across PA programs. Implementing a dermoscopy curriculum in established PA programs will enable future PAs to provide better clinical care when evaluating skin lesions.

Dermoscopy use by French private practice dermatologists: a nationwide survey.

BACKGROUND: Dermoscopy is now recognized as an essential tool for discriminating melanoma from other pigmented lesions, as corroborated by several robust meta-analyses. Although it is considered to be widely used in European countries, no published data on this topic are available to date, unlike in Australia and the U.S.A. OBJECTIVES: To describe and quantify the use and learning of dermoscopy among French private practice dermatologists. METHODS: A questionnaire of 19 items regarding demographic characteristics, dermoscopy use and training, and physician's judgment on dermoscopy was mailed to all French private practice dermatologists. Only questionnaires with an answer to the key item, 'Do you use dermoscopy?' were taken into account. RESULTS: Of 3179 mailed questionnaires, 1611 were returned and 1576 were analysable (49·6%). Most respondents declared using dermoscopy (94·6%), using their dermoscope several times a day (82·7%) and/or for the diagnosis of nonpigmented lesions (87·7%). Physicians learned dermoscopy mainly through books (75·8%) and/or conferences (88·6%); 12·8% reported a dedicated university degree. Dermoscopy helps to detect melanoma earlier and to perform fewer biopsies according to 86·6% and 74·6%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, female sex and age under 45 years were significantly associated with higher utilization rate of dermoscopy [odds ratio 1·89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·15-3·10; and 2·85, 95% CI 1·14-7·11, respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first published nationwide survey of dermoscopy practice in Europe. Despite potential classification and/or selection bias, the particularly high penetration rate found in our study suggests that dermoscopy is now widely accepted by French private practice dermatologists for the routine management of both pigmented and nonpigmented lesions.

One-year follow-up of dermoscopy education on the ability of medical students to detect skin cancer.

BACKGROUND: Learning skin cancer detection skills is important, yet many medical schools lack a standardized skin cancer examination (SCE) curriculum. OBJECTIVE: To determine medical students' skills in discriminating benign from malignant skin lesions on a 10-item image-based test one year after receiving a SCE intervention. METHODS: Cohort 1 received SCE teaching only. Cohort 2 received SCE teaching with dermoscopy tutorial, and a dermatoscope. The same test was given to assess students post-intervention and one year later. RESULTS: 43% (n = 145) and 38% (n = 143) of cohorts 1 and 2, respectively, participated one year later. Both cohorts improved or maintained their scores to correctly classify all lesions from post-intervention to one-year follow-up. After one year, cohort 2 maintained higher scores for successful identification of both benign and malignant lesions as compared to cohort 1. CONCLUSION: Medical students receiving a SCE intervention can improve their diagnostic skills after one year, especially with the aid of dermoscopy.