Enamel Surface Damage following Debonding of Ceramic Brackets: A Hospital-Based Study.

METHODS: The current study includes 80 extracted premolars of human from the patient visiting for orthodontic treatment of Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, Karnataka, India. The brackets were debonded using four different methods. The enamel surface damage after the procedure was assessed with the Enamel Surface Index (ESI); similarly, the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) score was used to determine the adhesive residual deposit. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to visualize better microporosities and micromechanical retention of adhesive remnants on the enamel surface. The normality of the data was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Depending upon the normality test result, the one-way ANOVA test or Kruskal-Wallis test was used to test the mean ESI and mean ARI differences among different debonding methods along with the appropriate post hoc tests. The necessary ethical clearance was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the institute. RESULTS: The ultrasonic scaler (US) technique led to more significant enamel surface damage, with 13 (65%) samples in the ESI scores III and IV against the satisfactory surface in 2 (10%) samples with the ligature cutter (LC) technique (ESI-I) reflecting LC as a better technique. The ESI scores (III and IV) for debonding plier (DP) and thermal method (TM) reflected a higher value in 12 (60%) and 10 (50%) samples and caused more damage to the enamel surface as compared to the LC technique. The ARI score was highest (ARI-1 = 40%) with the LC technique, followed by the US (ARI-1 = 20%), TM (ARI-1 = 15%), and DP (ARI-1 = 5%) methods. We have observed a significant association (p value <0.05) of the ARI score among four different debonding ways in terms of each tooth's residual adhesive after the bracket removal. CONCLUSION: The result establishes the LC technique as a more acceptable one as it causes minimal harm to the debonded surface. The adhesive left on the debonded area is also minimum as compared to the other three methods tested. Therefore, it can be suggested as an ideal method.

In vivo examination of enamel microcracks after orthodontic debonding: Is there a need for detailed analysis?

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to assess changes in the number of enamel microcracks (EMCs) after removing metal brackets in teeth with and without visible EMCs before the bonding procedure. METHODS: Before bonding, 13 patients having teeth with visible EMCs and 13 subjects whose teeth were free of EMCs were included in the study. All patients were asked to complete a questionnaire with a detailed medical history at the beginning of treatment and after removing metal brackets. The number of teeth with visible EMCs and the number of premolars without EMCs were recorded for each subject twice, that is, before bonding and after debonding, together with the tooth sensitivity assessments elicited by compressed air and cold testing. RESULTS: The number of visible EMCs in premolars increased after removing metal brackets. EMCs were recorded in at least 25.0% of all evaluated teeth for the patients having teeth with and without visible EMCs at the beginning of treatment. However, the changes in the number of visible EMCs were not significantly different (P = 0.619) between the groups. For the subjects with visible EMCs, tooth sensitivity caused by cold was registered nearly 3 times more often after removing brackets compared with the patients without EMCs prior bonding. CONCLUSIONS: Formation of EMCs was noticed after debonding. Changes in the number appeared to be similar for the subjects with and without visible EMCs before bonding. Higher incidence of EMCs was associated with more frequent tooth sensitivity perceptions after removing brackets.

Investigation of bacteremia after debonding procedures.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of debonding procedures after completion of orthodontic treatments on bacteremia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients who were treated with fixed orthodontic treatment at the Faculty of Dentistry's Department of Orthodontics at Gaziantep University and who had an indication of debonding were selected for this study, and blood samples were taken from these patients at different times and examined for bacteremia. Blood culture samples were taken from the antecubital veins of the patients prior to debonding (T0), immediately after removing the bracket (T1), and immediately after cleaning the composite residues and plaque deposits on the enamel surface (T2). The blood samples were then inoculated in blood culture bottles and investigated for bacterial growth. RESULTS: The results showed that there was no bacterial growth in the blood samples taken at T0 and T1, whereas 10 of the blood culture samples taken at T2 showed bacterial growth including the following bacteria; Streptococcus viridans, Streptococcus mitis, Streptococcus parasanguinis, Streptococcus salivarius, Streptococcus oralis, Staphylococcus aureus, Actinomyces oris, Actinomyces naeslundii and Klebsiella pneumoniae. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that patients in the risk group could develop bacteremia during debonding procedures. The presence of these bacteria in sterile blood suggested the possibility of bacterial endocarditis.

Enamel microcracks in the form of tooth damage during orthodontic debonding: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.

Objectives: To evaluate and compare the enamel microcracks (EMCs) characteristics (qualitative and quantitative) in the form of tooth damage before and after debonding from human teeth of in vitro studies. Eligibility criteria: Laboratorial studies evaluating EMCs characteristics before and after debonding metal and ceramic brackets from human teeth with intact buccal enamel. Information sources: An electronic search of four databases (all databases of the Cochrane Library, CA Web of Science, MEDLINE via PubMed, and Google Scholar) and additional manual searches were carried out, without language restrictions. Studies published between 2000 and 2017 years were selected. Reference lists of the included articles were screened, and authors were contacted when necessary. Risk of bias: The following six parameters were analyzed: blinding of examiner and outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data before bonding and after debonding, selective outcome reporting, and incomplete reporting of EMCs assessment. Included studies: Out of 430 potentially eligible studies, 259 were screened by title and abstract, 180 were selected for full-text analysis, 14 were included in the systematic review. Seven studies were selected for the meta-analysis. Synthesis of results: The results for EMCs characteristics were expressed as mean differences (MDs) with their 95 per cent confidence intervals (CIs), and calculated from random-effects meta-analyses. Debonding was associated with the increase in number (three studies, MD = 3.50, 95% CI, 2.13 to 4.87, P < 0.00001), length (seven studies, MD = 3.09 mm, 95% CI, 0.75-5.43, P < 0.00001), and width (three studies, MD = 0.39 µm, 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.79, P = 0.06) of EMCs. Considerable statistical heterogeneity was found for two forest plots evaluating the changes of number and length characteristics during debonding. Conclusions: There is weak evidence indicating length and width of EMCs increase following bracket removal and the scientific evidence concerning quantitative evaluation of the number parameter before and after debonding is insufficient. However, there is a strong evidence that after debonding the number of EMCs is likely to increase. Registration: No registration was performed.

Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding: A Comparative Study using Three Different Burs.

AIM: To compare effects of three different burs, i.e., tungsten carbide bur, composite bur, and fiber glass bur on the surface roughness of enamel after debonding evaluated by means of profilometry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was conducted in the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Guru Nanak Dev Dental College and Research Institute, Sunam, Punjab, India, from August 2011 to December 2012 on 36 extracted premolars. After mounting the samples in acrylic blocks with their buccal surfaces exposed, initial measurement of the surface roughness was made using profilometry. Teeth were then etched and brackets were bonded with light cure adhesive. After 3 days, the brackets were debonded using three different rotating burs at low speed, i.e., tungsten carbide bur, fiber glass bur, and composite bur. Enamel surface roughness values were obtained and assessed using paired t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, and post hoc multiple tests. RESULTS: Surface roughness of enamel increased significantly for tungsten carbide bur when compared with fiber glass bur and composite bur. But there was no significant difference in the surface roughness value when fiber glass bur was compared with the composite bur. CONCLUSION: Composite and fiber glass burs used for resin removal after orthodontic debonding produced a smoother enamel surface as compared with the tungsten carbide bur. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: After an orthodontic treatment, restoring the enamel surface to its pretreatment condition without inducing any iatrogenic damage after debonding is a clinical challenge. Residual resin removal through proper means ensures a smooth surface, and, hence, a plaque-free environment. Finishing requires as much planning and execution as planned for the fixed therapy itself.

Are fibre posts associated with the occurrence of prosthetic complications?

Data sourcesThe Pubmed, Evidence-Based Dentistry, BMJ Clinical Evidence, EmbaseDynamed, and www.opengrey.eu databases and manual search of reference lists.Study selectionRandomised clinical trials (RCTs) were accepted if they had: participants with no periodontal disease and teeth restored with SCs or FDPs and compared fibre posts and other prosthetic systems and evaluated the prosthetic complications with a minimum observational period of 36 months.Data extraction and synthesisTitles and abstracts were evaluated independently by two reviewers, any disagreement was discussed with a third reviewer. The agreement for the two reviewers was 97%. The quality and the risk of bias of the studies included was assessed following the Cochrane Handbook considering the domains of randomisation, sample size, inclusion and exclusion criteria, follow-up achieved, blinding, withdrawing and groups' compatibility for quality assessment, and for the risk of bias the domains evaluated were allocation concealment, blinding of outcome assessor and follow-up.ResultsThe database search yielded 4,230 records; after duplications removal, 3,670 records were reviewed independently by the authors, and four articles were chosen to include in the systematic review.The most frequently reported failures in the available studies were as follows: fibre post debonding, loss of retention of single crowns and marginal gaps. Less frequently, chippings and fractures were recorded in SCs. No studies about complications related to FDPs were found.The failure rate ranged from 0 to 28.2%.ConclusionsA correlation between the failure rates of fibre posts and the type of prosthetic restoration (SCs or FDPs ) cannot be found. Further RCTs are required to achieve evidence-based conclusions, particularly about the use of fibre posts with FDPs.

Does orthodontic debonding lead to tooth sensitivity? Comparison of teeth with and without visible enamel microcracks.

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to assess the possible changes in sensitivity of teeth with and without visible enamel microcracks (EMCs) up to 1 week after the removal of metal brackets. METHODS: After debonding, 15 patients possessing teeth with visible EMCs and 15 subjects whose teeth were free of EMCs were enrolled in the study. For each experimental group, a control group was formed. The assessments of tooth sensitivity elicited by compressed air and cold testing were performed 5 times: just before debonding, immediately after debonding, and at 1, 3, and 7 days after debonding. Tooth sensitivity was recorded on a 100-mm visual analog scale. RESULTS: For the patients without visible EMCs, discomfort peaked immediately after debonding and started to decrease on day 1; at 1 week after debonding, the visual analog scale scores were lower than just before debonding and immediately after debonding. For the subjects possessing teeth with visible EMCs, the pattern of sensitivity dynamic was inherently the same. However, the patients with visible EMCs showed higher visual analog scale values at each time interval. CONCLUSIONS: Debonding leads to a short-term increase in tooth sensitivity. EMCs, a form of enamel damage, do not predispose to greater sensitivity perception in relation to bracket removal.

Quantitative analysis of enamel on debonded orthodontic brackets.

INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic damage to the tooth surface in the form of enamel tearouts can occur during removal of fixed orthodontic appliances. The aim of this study was to assess debonded metal and ceramic brackets attached with a variety of bonding materials to determine how frequently this type of damage occurs. METHODS: Eighty-one patients close to finishing fixed orthodontic treatment were recruited. They had metal brackets bonded with composite resin and a 2-step etch-and-bond technique or ceramic brackets bonded with composite resin and a 2-step etch-and- bond technique, and composite resin with a self-etching primer or resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Debonded brackets were examined by backscattered scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy to determine the presence and area of enamel on the base pad. RESULTS: Of the 486 brackets collected, 26.1% exhibited enamel on the bonding material on the bracket base pad. The incidences of enamel tearouts for each group were metal brackets, 13.3%; ceramic brackets, 30.2%; composite resin with self-etching primer, 38.2%; and resin-modified glass ionomer cement, 21.2%. The percentage of the bracket base pad covered in enamel was highly variable, ranging from 0% to 46.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Enamel damage regularly occurred during the debonding process with the degree of damage being highly variable. Damage occurred more frequently when ceramic brackets were used (31.9%) compared with metal brackets (13.3%). Removal of ceramic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement resulted in less damage compared with the resin bonding systems.

Microbiological assessment of aerosol generated during debond of fixed orthodontic appliances.

INTRODUCTION: The aims of this study were to describe bacterial load and diversity of the aerosol created during enamel cleanup after the removal of fixed orthodontic appliances and to assess the effect of a preprocedural mouth rinse. METHODS: The study involved the sampling of ambient air adjacent to the patient's mouth during adhesive removal using a slow-speed handpiece and a spiral fluted tungsten carbide bur without water irrigation. Sampling was carried out during enamel cleanup with or without a preprocedural mouth rinse of either sterile water or chlorhexidine. Airborne particles were collected using a viable inertial impactor simulating the human respiratory tree. The bacteria collected were analyzed using both culture and molecular techniques. RESULTS: Bacteria produced during debond and enamel cleanup can reach all levels of the respiratory tree. The use of a preprocedural mouth rinse, either sterile water or chlorhexidine, increased the numbers and diversity of the bacteria in the air. CONCLUSIONS: When using a slow-speed handpiece and a spiral fluted tungsten carbide bur for enamel cleanup after orthodontic treatment, the bacterial load and diversity of the aerosol produced are lower when a preprocedural mouth rinse is not used.

Effect of adhesive resin flexibility on enamel fracture during metal bracket debonding: an ex vivo study.

OBJECTIVE: To test the null hypothesis that neither the flexural properties of orthodontic adhesive resins nor the enamel pre-treatment methods would affect metal bracket debonding behaviours, including enamel fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A dimethacrylate-based resin (Transbond XT, TX) and two methyl methacrylate (MMA)-based resins (Super-Bond C&B, SB; an experimental light-cured resin, EXP) were tested. Flexural strength and flexural modulus for each resin were measured by a three-point-bending test. Metal brackets were bonded to human enamel pretreated with total-etch (TE) or self-etch adhesive using one of the three resins (a total of six groups, n = 15). After 24 hours of storage in water at 37°C, a shear bond strength (SBS) test was performed using the wire loop method. After debonding, remaining resin on the enamel surfaces and occurrence of enamel fracture were assessed. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: The two MMA resins exhibited substantially lower flexural strength and modulus values than the TX resin. The mean SBS values of all groups (10.15-11.09MPa) were statistically equivalent to one another (P > 0.05), except for the TE-TX group (13.51MPa, P < 0.05). The two EXP groups showed less resin remnant. Only in the two TX groups were enamel fractures observed (three cases for each group). LIMITATIONS: The results were drawn only from ex vivo experiments. CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis is rejected. This study suggests that a more flexible MMA resin is favourable for avoiding enamel fracture during metal bracket debonding.

Emergencies in Orthodontics. Part 2: Management of Removable Appliances, Functional Appliances and other Adjuncts to Orthodontic Treatment.

In the second of two papers, management of orthodontic emergencies involving appliances other than Fixed appliances will be detailed. Problems relating to removable appliances, as well as other orthodontic adjuncts, will be discussed. Unfortunately, orthodontic appliance breakage does occur, despite the clinicians giving clear and concise instructions to the patients and their parents at fitting. If general dental practitioners have a practical knowledge of how to diagnose problems and to provide appropriate advice or timely 'emergency' treatment, this will significantly reduce the inconvenience for all parties concerned. It should also ensure that treatment progresses in the most efficient and comfortable manner for their patients. In specific situations the early, accurate identification of the problem and instigation of its appropriate management can avoid more serious consequences. Clinical Relevance: Appropriate handling of an orthodontic 'emergency' by the dentist can, on many occasions, provide immediate relief to the patient. This will, in turn, allow treatment to continue in the right direction, thus allowing more efficient and effective use of valuable resources.

Evaluation of enamel micro-cracks characteristics after removal of metal brackets in adult patients.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare enamel micro-crack characteristics of adult patients before and after removal of metal brackets. After the examination with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), 45 extracted human teeth were divided into three groups of equal size: group 1, the teeth having enamel micro-cracks, group 2, the teeth without initial enamel micro-cracks, and group 3, control group to study the effect of dehydration on existing micro-cracks or formation of new ones. For all the teeth in groups 1 and 2, the same bonding and debonding procedures of metal brackets were conducted. The length and width of the longest enamel micro-crack were measured for all the teeth before and after removal of metal brackets. The changes in the location of the micro-cracks were also evaluated. In group 3, teeth were subjected to the same analysis but not bonded. The mean overall width of micro-cracks after removal of metal brackets was 3.82 µm greater than before bonding procedure (P < 0.05). Also, a significant difference was noticed between the width of micro-cracks in first zone (cervical third) and third zone (occlusal third) after debonding procedure (P < 0.05). New enamel micro-cracks were found in 6 of 15 (40 per cent) examined teeth. Greatest changes in the width of enamel micro-cracks after debonding procedure appear in the cervical third of the tooth. On the basis of this result, the dentist must pay extra care and attention to this specific area of enamel during removal of metal brackets in adult patients.

Does ultra-pulse CO(2) laser reduce the risk of enamel damage during debonding of ceramic brackets?

This study seeks to evaluate the enamel surface characteristics of teeth after debonding of ceramic brackets with or without laser light. Eighty premolars were bonded with either of the chemically retained or the mechanically retained ceramic brackets and later debonded conventionally or through a CO(2) laser (188 W, 400 Hz). The laser was applied for 5 s with scanning movement. After debonding, the adhesive remnant index (ARI), the incidence of bracket and enamel fracture, and the lengths, frequency, and directions of enamel cracks were compared among the groups. The increase in intrapulpal temperature was measured in ten extra specimens. The data were analyzed with SPSS software. There was one case of enamel fracture in the chemical retention/conventional debonding group. When brackets were removed with pliers, incidences of bracket fracture were 45% for the chemical retention, and 15% for the mechanical retention brackets. No case of enamel or bracket fracture was seen in the laser-debonded teeth. A significant difference was observed in ARI scores among the groups. Laser debonding caused a significant decrease in the frequency of enamel cracks, compared to conventional debonding. The increase in intrapulpal temperatures was below the benchmark of 5.5 °C for all the specimens. Laser-assisted debonding of ceramic brackets could reduce the risk of enamel damage and bracket fracture, and produce the more desirable ARI scores without causing thermal damage to the pulp. However, some augmentations in the length and frequency of enamel cracks should be expected with all debonding methods.

Effect of simulated debracketing on enamel damage.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: A smooth enamel surface after the removal of a bracket from a tooth is essential for both esthetic demands and the prevention of plaque accumulation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate enamel damage caused by three standardized debracketing techniques. METHODS: We established three standardized test devices based on the principles of the squeezing, shearing, and tensile testing methods, which were simulated using a How Plier (TASK 60-306), a Direct Bond Bracket Remover (TASK 60-335 T), and a Lift-Off Debracketing Instrument (3 M-Unitek 444-761), respectively. Thirty teeth in each group were evaluated after debracketing. An optical stereomicroscope and a CCD camera with a computerized image analysis system were used to ascertain the proportion of remnant adhesive area (RAE) on the enamel surface. Fractography was analyzed using a scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: The squeezing debracketing method exhibited the highest debonding force (54.3 ± 7.0 N) and the least damage to the enamel surface (RAE = 99.5% ± 2.4%). The tensile debracketing method preserved most of the adhesive on the enamel surface (RAE = 98.7% ± 3.3%) and required the least debonding force (6.8 ± 1.2 N). However, the shearing debracketing method exhibited a significantly higher debonding force (32.0 ± 8.2 N) and smaller RAE (77.3% ± 33.5%) compared to the tensile debracketing method (p < 0.05). Three specimens appeared to have vertical fractures on their enamel prisms when using the shearing method. CONCLUSION: With the proposed method, we conclude that the squeezing and tensile methods are acceptable for clinical use when debracketing, whereas the Direct Bond Bracket Remover may cause shearing failure, leading to a risk for enamel damage.

Fabrication and evaluation of Bis-GMA/TEGDMA resin with various amounts of silane-coated silica for orthodontic use.

The objective of this research was to fabricate a composite with an optimum filler level in a bisphenol-A-glycidyldimethacrylate (Bis-GMA) triethylene glycidal dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) resin for bonding of metallic orthodontic brackets to achieve the best handling characteristics with optimum bond strength and without compromising the mechanical properties of the adhesive. One-hundred and sixty extracted human premolars free of any detectable pathology or buccal surface alterations were collected and divided into four groups. In group 1 (control), the teeth were bonded with stainless steel brackets using Transbond XT. In groups 2, 3, and 4, the teeth were bonded with metal brackets using a Bis-GMA/TEGDMA resin with 80, 60, and 20 per cent by weight silane-coated silica of a spherical shape with a mean size of 0.01 µm. Shear bond strength (SBS) of the composites was determined and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) and enamel fracture post-debonding were assessed. According to one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) multiple comparison tests, the SBS of group 4 (10.54 MPa) was considerably less than that of groups 1 (26.1 MPa), 2 (25.5 MPa), and 3 (24.6 MPa). Chi-square analysis revealed that there was an insignificant difference in the incidence of enamel fracture between groups 1 and 2, while a significant difference was present between groups 1 and 2 and 3 and 4. An insignificant difference was also observed in the location of the adhesive failure between the four groups. While all the bonding adhesives tested can be safely used for bonding of brackets, 60 per cent filled Bis-GMA/TEGDMA was superior clinically due to its ease of handling and superior bond strength.

Effects of different application durations of ER:YAG laser on intrapulpal temperature change during debonding.

This study was done to determine the amount of lasing time required to remove ceramic brackets safely without causing intrapulpal damage by using Er:YAG laser with the scanning method. Part 1: 80 bovine mandibular incisors with ceramic brackets were randomly assigned into four groups of 20 as one control and three study groups. In the study groups, brackets were debonded after lasing for 3, 6, and 9 s, whereas debonding was performed without lasing in the control group. Shear bond strengths and ARI scores were also measured. Part 2: 30 human premolars with ceramic brackets were randomly divided into three groups of ten, as 3, 6, and 9 s of lasing durations. Intrapulpal temperature was measured at the same lasing times by a thermocouple. Statistically significant lower shear bond strengths were found in study groups compared to the control. A negative correlation was seen between the bond strengths and ARI scores in such a way that, as the shear bond strengths decreased, the ARI scores increased. Temperature increases for all the study groups were measured below the 5.5°C benchmark. All lasing times were effective for debonding without causing enamel tear outs or bracket failures. The temperature proportionally increased with the extension of the lasing duration. Six-second lasing by the scanning method using Er:YAG laser was found to be the most effective and safest way of removing the ceramic brackets without causing damage to the enamel and pulpal tissues.

Restoration of the anterior maxilla after thermal trauma as a sequela to post removal: a clinical report.

Removing posts from endodontically treated teeth without considering the effects of heat trauma can have adverse consequences for the tissues surrounding the roots of the associated teeth. Ultrasonic instrumentation has been widely used as a more conservative approach than other methods of removing posts without untoward sequelae. However, copious irrigation must be used to prevent elevated temperatures caused by ultrasonic energy. This clinical report presents the consequences of post removal in 2 maxillary incisors with ultrasonic instrumentation without sufficient regard to root overheating. Necrosis of the surrounding tissues was observed after 2 weeks. The functional and esthetic reconstruction of the area affected by the heat trauma is described.

In-vitro study of the effect of casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium fluoride phosphate on iatrogenic damage to enamel during orthodontic adhesive removal.

INTRODUCTION: White-spot lesions (WSL) might be susceptible to mechanical damage during orthodontic bracket and adhesive removal. The aims of this in-vitro study were to investigate enamel loss on bracket and adhesive removal when the brackets were surrounded by WSL and to determine the effect of remineralizing these lesions with a 1% (w/v) casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium fluoride phosphate (CPP-ACFP) solution before bracket and adhesive removal. METHODS: Precoated metal mandibular incisor brackets were centrally bonded onto polished third molars and WSL produced by exposure to a demineralization buffer for 4, 12, and 30 days (n = 20 per group). Half of the demineralized window was covered with acid-resistant nail varnish, and the specimens were then subjected to remineralization with 1% CPP-ACFP. Brackets and residual adhesive were removed, and enamel damage was assessed by digital photography, profilometry, and scanning electron microscopy. Lesion depth, mineral loss, and remineralization were measured by transverse microradiography. RESULTS: WSL enamel around the bracket was more susceptible to iatrogenic damage at adhesive removal compared with sound enamel. Remineralization of lesions with 1% CPP-ACFP before adhesive removal significantly (P <0.002) reduced the area and depth of damage. CONCLUSIONS: Remineralizing WSLs with CPP-ACFP before adhesive removal reduced iatrogenic enamel damage.

Shear bond strength after multiple bracket bonding with or without repeated etching.

The purpose of the study was to measure the in vitro shear bond strength (SBS) of metal brackets after multiple bonding and debonding with and without repeated etching. One hundred and twenty extracted premolars were divided into three equal groups. In group 1, the brackets were bonded and debonded three times with repeated enamel etching and in groups 2 and 3 without repeated etching. In group 2, all composite remnants were removed before bonding, while in group 3, the remnants were levelled. Analysis of variance was used to determine significant differences in SBS with Bonferroni adjustment for the multiple testing procedures. The results showed that in group 1, the mean SBS was 11.69 MPa (SD 2.65) at the first, 14.30 MPa (SD 2.69) at the second, and 12.19 MPa (SD 2.26) at the third debonding. In group 2, SBS decreased from 12.57 MPa (SD 2.54) to below 8.0 MPa. In group 3, SBS remained constant from the first (11.93 MPa; SD 2.14) to the second (12.06 MPa; SD 1.65) debonding and only decreased significantly to 9.74 MPa (SD 1.80) at the third debonding. Less composite remained on the teeth after each debonding sequence. This was characterized by a shift from adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores 2 and 3 after the first debonding to ARI scores 1 and 2 after the second debonding to predominantly scores 0 and 1 after the third debonding. After bracket loss and levelling of composite remnants, the SBS is sufficient for application of orthodontic forces. Repeated etching may involve a higher risk of enamel tear-outs during debonding.

Bucco-lingual "dimple" technique for removing full-crown and cast-metal restorations.

Many longitudinal studies of the longevity of full-crown and cast-metal restorations have been made. Dentists and dental team members marvel at the crown or bridge that has been in place and functioning for 30 or 40 years in a mature or elderly patient. Dental insurance company statistics and clinical records seem to indicate, however, that the average life span of a crown is closer to seven or eight years. How do you respond to the patient who asks, "Doctor, how long will this crown/bridge last?" Whatever your answer, it is realistic to expect that a newly inserted crown or fixed bridge will require replacement at some point in the patient's lifetime.