A pilot study of intralesional methotrexate injections versus triamcinolone acetonide in patients affected by nail matrix psoriasis.

Nail disorders in general are difficult to treat and often frustrating, and this is also the case with nail psoriasis, especially when it is limited to the nails, and not affecting joints. The quality of life of patients with nail psoriasis is negatively affected, owing to the chronic course of the disease and frequent relapses. The purpose of this study was to compare treatment response and maintenance of response during follow-up of 12 patients with nail matrix psoriasis limited to a few nails, who were treated with intralesional injections of either methotrexate (MTX) 25 mg/mL or triamcinolone acetonide 10 mg/mL. Patients were treated every 6 weeks for 24 weeks and followed up for 6 months. Photographic documentation and assessment by Nail Psoriasis Severity Index were performed during each treatment session and at each follow-up visit. At the end of the four treatment sessions, all patients had improvement of their disease, which continued during follow-up, especially for the MTX-treated group.

Hand-foot syndrome and nail disorders secondary to treatment with paclitaxel: Is there a relationship with the presence of fungi?

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of nail disorders and the presence of fungi on the nails of the hands and feet of patients with hand-foot syndrome secondary to treatment with paclitaxel. METHODS: Prospective study, carried out from October 2018 to December 2019, which included 81 patients undergoing treatment for breast cancer using paclitaxel and had signs and or symptoms of hand-foot syndrome with or without nail disorders. The data were collected through interviews guided by a structured questionnaire, information from medical records and reports of mycological exams. RESULTS: The average age of women was 54.7 ± 7.4 years. Nail disorders occurred in 69 patients (85.2%), and of these, 43 (62.3%) were positive for fungi. The fungi were yeasts (n = 38; 69%), dermatophytes (n = 15; 27.2%) and non-dermatophyte filamentous fungi (n = 8; 14.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Nail disorders were the most frequent manifestations in patients with hand-foot syndrome treated with paclitaxel and occurred in 85.2% of them. It was evidenced that fungi are present on the nails of these patients and can occur in up to 65.28%. The most prevalent fungi were Candida and Trichophyton. The nail lesion was associated with the type of treatment protocol used by the patient. The results of the study point to the need to select safe management alternatives for patients, so they can prevent nail lesions and prevent the proliferation of fungi, consequently reducing negative life impact during treatment.

Nail Psoriasis Improvement During Tildrakizumab Therapy: A Real-Life Experience.

The aim of this retrospective study of patients affected by plaque psoriasis who underwent tildrakizumab therapy was to describe and compare the response of the nail psoriasis and the plaque psoriasis elsewhere in the body. Eight patients treated with tildrakizumab, 4 males and 4 females with a mean age of 61 years affected by psoriasis (mean baseline-PASI:13) with nail involvement (mean baseline mNAPSI: 51.9), were followed for at least 20 weeks. At week 4, the mean PASI was 6.6 (49% improvement), and the mean mNAPSI was 30.8 (40.6% improvement). At week 20, the mean PASI was 2.1 (84% improvement), and the mean mNAPSI was 5.1 (90% improvement). The fast improvement of the nail psoriasis in the 8 patients was unexpected, considering the fact that Tildrakizumab is a molecule that in RCTs (reSURFACE-1 and 2) studies has proved to be efficacious against plaque psoriasis but not strikingly fast, requiring at least 20 weeks to achieve the best PASI-improvements in most patients. Evidence regarding nail improvement during tildrakizumab are scarce. Studies including a higher number of patients are required in order to confirm our observation of the fast improvement of nail psoriasis during Tildrakizumab. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(8):914-916. doi:10.36849/JDD.6828.

A prospective phase-II trial of biweekly docetaxel plus androgen deprivation therapy in patients with previously-untreated metastatic castration-naïve prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this prospective phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of biweekly docetaxel plus androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with metastatic castration-naïve prostate cancer (mCNPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically-proven, previously-untreated mCNPC received ADT plus docetaxel, 40 mg/m2. Docetaxel was repeated every 2 weeks, up to 12 cycles. Endpoints included castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)-free survival, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients were registered and analyzed for final outcomes. Of the 42 patients, 36 (86%) completed the 12 planned cycles of docetaxel plus ADT. During a median follow up of 25 months, all but two patients (95%) achieved a PSA response with a nadir PSA level of 0.42 ng/ml (range 0.01-1280.87). The median CRPC-free survival was 26.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 20.9-32.0) with a one-year CRPC-free rate of 79% (33 patients, 95% CI 66-91). Multivariable analysis revealed that the performance status of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0 was independently associated with longer CRPC-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.27, 95% CI 0.07-0.99). The most common adverse events of any grade were anemia (95%), followed by nail changes (33%), fatigue (29%), and oral mucositis (26%). Severe (grade 3 or higher) adverse events were infrequent: pneumonitis (n = 2), diarrhea (n = 1), and neutropenia (n = 1). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that biweekly docetaxel plus ADT is feasible, and clinical efficacy does not seem to be compromised compared to a standard triweekly docetaxel 75 mg/m2 plus ADT regimen.

Bluish-gray fingernail discoloration due to the use of nivolumab.

INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved clinical outcomes in a wide range of cancers. While skin toxicity is not uncommon with immune checkpoint inhibitors, generalized nail discoloration has not been reported with their use in oncology. CASE REPORT: Herein, we report a unique case of bluish-gray fingernail discoloration due to nivolumab therapy for relapsed melanoma.Management and outcome: This condition reversed completely 10 weeks after nivolumab discontinuation. Naranjo nomogram assessment renders the causality relationship between nivolumab and nail discoloration probable. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first case report of an unusual bluish-gray nail discoloration due to therapy with nivolumab. The mechanism by which nivolumab causes this side effect remains to be elucidated.

Acitretin-induced periungual pyogenic granulomas and review.

Periungual pyogenic granulomas are benign vascular tumors that present as painful, round, spontaneously bleeding lesions composed of rapidly proliferating capillaries and excess tissue. The vast majority of pyogenic granulomas are caused by physical trauma or infectious agents and they may resolve spontaneously. Herein, we highlight a very rare case of periungual pyogenic granulomas induced by the regularly prescribed oral retinoid acitretin during treatment for congenital palmoplantar keratoderma. This unique case showed that it is feasible to continue acitretin therapy in the presence of pyogenic granuloma development if proper dose reduction and topical therapies are utilized. The patient's lesions resolved within two weeks of this protocol's initiation and the pyogenic granulomas did not recur over the course of a six-month follow-up observation period. In addition, we performed a systematic review of the literature using PubMed databases for the clinical features and treatments in other reported acitretin-induced pyogenic granuloma cases; we compiled a comprehensive list of other prescription drugs known to cause pyogenic granulomas up-to-date.

Outpatient dermatology consultations for oncology patients with acute dermatologic adverse events impact anticancer therapy interruption: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Dermatologic adverse events (dAEs) of anticancer therapies may negatively impact dosing and quality of life. While therapy interruption patterns due to dAEs have been studied in hospitalized cancer patients, similar outcomes in outpatient oncodermatology are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To analyse the therapy interruption patterns, clinico-histopathologic characteristics and management outcomes of outpatient dermatology consultations for acute dAEs attributed to the most frequently interrupted class of oncologic agents. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all cancer patients who received a same-day outpatient dermatology consultation for acute dAEs at our institution from 1 January to 30 June 2015. Relevant data were abstracted from electronic medical records, including demographics, oncologic history and explicit recommendations by both the referring clinician and consulting dermatologist on anticancer therapy interruption. Consultations with the most frequently interrupted class of oncologic treatment were characterized according to clinico-histopathologic features, dermatologic management and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: There were 426 same-day outpatient dermatology consultations (median age 59, 60% female, 30% breast cancer), of which 295 (69%) had systemic anticancer therapy administered within 30 days prior. There was weak inter-rater agreement between referring clinicians and consulting dermatologists on interruption of anticancer treatment (n = 150, κ = 0.096; 95% CI -0.02 to 0.21). Seventy-three (25%) consultations involved interruption by the referring clinician, most commonly targeted therapy (24, 33%). Maculopapular rash was commonly observed in 23 consultations with 25 dAEs attributed to targeted agents (48%), and topical corticosteroids were most frequently utilized for management (22, 38%). The majority (83%) of consultations with targeted therapy-induced dAEs responded to dermatologic treatment and 84% resumed oncologic therapy, although three (19%) at a reduced dose. Rash recurred only in two instances (13%). CONCLUSIONS: A high frequency of positive outcomes in the management of targeted therapy-induced dAEs by outpatient consulting dermatologists and low recurrence of skin toxicity suggests impactful reductions in interruption of anticancer therapy.

[Lichenoid drug eruption with antituberculosis drugs associated with an anonychia]. / Toxidermie lichénoïde aux antituberculeux associée à une anonychie.

INTRODUCTION: Lichenoid cutaneous reactions to antituberculosis drugs are rare. Herein we report a new case. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 41-year-old patient was seen for a profuse and pruriginous rash occurring 2 weeks after administration of rifampicin and isoniazid for pulmonary tuberculosis. Dermatological examination revealed polymorphic erythemato-squamous plaques with lichenoid, psoriatic and eczematous features, associated with cheilitis, erosions on the cheeks and diffuse onychodystrophy. The skin biopsy confirmed a lichenoid reaction. The pharmacovigilance investigation incriminated isoniazid and rifampicin. The patient was treated with topical corticosteroids and UVB phototherapy. The outcome involved complete regression of the eruption but with secondary anonychia. DISCUSSION: Antituberculosis drugs including isoniazid and rifampicin are known to induce lichenoid reactions. It is difficult to distinguish the results from lichen planus. The clinical polymorphism of the rash as well as the patient's drug intake militate in favour of a diagnosis of lichenoid reaction. Widespread ungual involvement, which is extremely rare, warranted early management in order to avert irreversible anonychia.

Longitudinal melanonychia and subungual hemorrhage in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus treated with hydroxychloroquine.

Hydroxychloroquine is an antimalarial agent, most commonly prescribed in the treatment of several rheumatic diseases. Although generally well tolerated, a variety of mucocutaneous adverse effects have been reported. Besides the familiar adverse effects, longitudinal melanonychia is rarely seen. Although the incidence is extremely low, systemic lupus erythematosus may also cause nail pigmentation in its own right. We report the case of a 55-year-old woman who was diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus and presented with longitudinal melanonychia of all 10 fingernails after 3 years of treatment with hydroxychloroquine, without mucocutaneous hyperpigmentation. The pigment of the nail lasted for more than 15 years. To the best of our knowledge, this is first published report of hydroxychloroquine-induced melanonychia without mucocutaneous hyperpigmentation. This case demonstrates that hydroxychloroquine treatment and the primary disease should be considered in the case of multiple nail changes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Nail cosmetics: a dermatological perspective.

Nail cosmetics are used by millions worldwide and the variety of products available is expanding. They are relatively safe, but complications can occur, and patients experiencing complications may present to dermatologists. The physical processes can cause nail thinning and onycholysis, poor technique can promote infection, and consumers may develop allergic contact dermatitis. Ultraviolet nail lamps are widely used for curing gel nails, but their use is unregulated and they are readily accessible in salons or for home use. There is concern about potential carcinogenesis; however, the risk is negligible and can be further reduced with the use of sunscreen. Despite the potential complications, nail cosmetics may be a useful adjunct in treating nail disorders. Familiarity with the procedures will enable the dermatologist to recognize problems and advise on safe use.

Prophylactic management for taxane-induced nail toxicity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy of cryotherapy and nail solution (NS) use in preventing nail toxicity (NT) induced by taxane-based chemotherapy. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov registry databases were searched for relevant studies published up to December 2018. The primary outcome was taxane-induced NT. Secondary outcomes were skin toxicity (ST), time to toxicity and patient comfort. RESULTS: We reviewed three randomised control trials and six prospective studies with 708 patients. For meta-analysis, taxane-induced NT grading was compared. NT and ST were significantly lower in the cryotherapy patients than in the controls (grade 1 NT: risk ratio [RR] = 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.30-0.89; grade 2-3 NT: RR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.11-1.12; total NT: RR = 0.49; 95% CI = 0.30-0.79; ST: RR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.33-0.64). The NS-treated patients exhibited significantly lower NT than the controls. CONCLUSIONS: Nail solution-treated or cryotherapy patients exhibited lower NT incidence and severity associated with taxane-based chemotherapy than the controls. For patients who can afford and comply with NS use or cryotherapy, these measures represent effective prophylactic management for taxane-induced NT and improve their quality of life and functional statuses. Further studies are needed to establish the routine usage protocols, long-term efficacy and safety for these interventions.

Nail changes due to chemotherapy: a prospective observational study of 129 patients.

BACKGROUND: Nail changes due to systemic drugs are common, especially with anticancer treatments due to involvement of nail plate, nail bed and periungual area. OBJECTIVE: To study the pattern of nail changes occurring due to chemotherapy in patients suffering from various malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, observational study was conducted at various health care centres, Nashik, India, for 15 months. The timing of administration of chemotherapy and onset of nail changes were recorded and evaluated by a dermatologist at regular interval. RESULTS: A total of 129 diagnosed cases of various malignancies who received chemotherapy were included. The most common malignancy noted was breast cancer, that is n = 42 (32.5%) followed by oral cancer, that is n = 24 (18.6%). Chemotherapy agents included taxanes (n = 54), cyclophosphamide (n = 42) and prednisolone (n = 28). Nail changes were noted in 92 patients (71.3%). The most common nail changes observed were chromonychia (n = 70, 54.26%), followed by nail dystrophy (n = 38, 29.45%). CONCLUSION: Nail toxicity is quite common side effect of anticancer agents. Nail changes due to chemotherapy depend on the nail structure involved and the severity of insult. Awareness among dermatologists and oncologists of these nail changes and their culprit agent can promote early diagnosis and may avoid inadvertent measures.

Transverse melanonychia in a child receiving chemotherapy.

Transverse melanonychia is a rare finding often secondary to chemotherapy, orally ingested medications, or other iatrogenic interventions. A 19-month-old boy with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis treated with biweekly etoposide and dexamethasone developed transverse bands of pigment in all toenail and fingernail units consistent with transverse melanonychia. We review the literature for reported cases of transverse melanonychia and summarize suspected etiologies.

Cutaneous toxicity as a predictive biomarker for clinical outcome in patients receiving anticancer therapy.

The relationship between treatment outcome and cutaneous toxicity induced by anticancer therapy has gained attention in the past decade. In this article, we have provided an overview of the 3 main classes of anticancer agents-specifically, molecularly targeted kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and cytotoxic chemotherapeutics-and described the data evaluating the association between cutaneous toxicity induced by these agents and survival benefit. Although preliminary studies are promising with regard to the potential role of cutaneous toxicities as a surrogate biomarker of efficacy of treatment, larger prospective studies are needed to confirm this relationship. Dermatologists have a unique opportunity to collaborate with oncologists in the multidisciplinary treatment paradigm by helping to identify and manage these dermatologic events in patients with cancer. A heightened awareness of these toxicities is critical, as it can potentially allow recognition of the efficacy of anticancer therapy and may influence treatment decisions and patient outcomes.