RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Many patients participate in cancer trials to access new therapies. The extent to which new treatments produce clinical benefit for trial participants is unclear. PURPOSE: To estimate the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) advantage of assignment to experimental groups in randomized trials for 6 solid tumors. DATA SOURCES: ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for trials of investigational drugs with results posted between 2017 and 2021. STUDY SELECTION: Investigational drugs were defined as those not yet having full approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the study indication. Trials were included if they were randomized and tested drugs or biologics. DATA EXTRACTION: Data extraction was completed by 2 independent reviewers. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. DATA SYNTHESIS: The sample included 128 trials comprising 141 comparisons of a new drug and a comparator. These comparisons included 47 050 patients. The pooled hazard ratio for PFS was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.85), indicating statistically significant benefit for patients in experimental groups. This corresponded to a median PFS advantage of 1.25 months (CI, 0.80 to 1.68 months). The pooled hazard ratio for OS was 0.92 (CI, 0.88 to 0.95), corresponding to a survival gain of 1.18 months (CI, 0.72 to 1.71 months). The absolute risk for a serious adverse event for comparator group patients was 29.56% (CI, 26.64% to 32.65%), with an increase in risk of 7.40% (CI, 5.66% to 9.14%) for patients in experimental groups. LIMITATIONS: Trials in this sample were heterogeneous. Comparator group interventions were assumed to reflect standard of care. CONCLUSION: Assignment to experimental groups produces statistically significant survival gains. However, the absolute survival gain is small, and toxicity is statistically significantly greater. The findings of this review provide reassuring evidence that patients are not meaningfully disadvantaged by assignment to comparator groups. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Drogas em Investigação , Neoplasias , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Drogas em Investigação/uso terapêutico , Drogas em Investigação/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Medição de RiscoRESUMO
Currently, cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth recorded widespread cancer among women globally. There are still many cases of metastatic or recurring disease discovered, despite the incidence and fatality rates declining due to screening identification and innovative treatment approaches. Palliative chemotherapy continues to be the standard of care for patients who are not contenders for curative therapies like surgery and radiotherapy. This article seeks to provide a thorough and current summary of therapies that have been looked into for the management of CC. The authors emphasize the ongoing trials while reviewing the findings of clinical research. Agents that use biological mechanisms to target different molecular pathways such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), poly ADP-ribosepolymerase (PARP), and epigenetic biological mechanisms epitomize and offer intriguing research prospects.
Assuntos
Drogas em Investigação , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Humanos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/genética , Feminino , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/métodos , Drogas em Investigação/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptores ErbB/genética , Transdução de Sinais/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Expanded access (EA) is a Food and Drug Administration-regulated pathway to provide access to investigational products (IPs) to individuals with serious diseases who are ineligible for clinical trials. The aim of this report is to share the design and operations of a multicenter, multidrug EA program for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) across nine US centers. METHODS: A central coordination center was established to design and conduct the program. Templated documents and processes were developed to streamline study design, regulatory submissions, and clinical operations across protocols. The program included three protocols and provided access to IPs that were being tested in respective regimens of the HEALEY ALS Platform Trial (verdiperstat, CNM-Au8, and pridopidine). Clinical and safety data were collected in all EA protocols (EAPs). The program cohorts comprised participants who were not eligible for the platform trial, including participants at advanced stages of disease progression and with long disease duration. RESULTS: A total of 85 participants were screened across the 3 EAPs from July 2021 to September 2022. The screen failure rate was 3.5%. Enrollment for the regimens of the platform trial was completed as planned and results informed the duration of the corresponding EAP. The verdiperstat EAP was concluded in December 2022. Mean duration of participation in the verdiperstat EAP was 5.8 ± 4.1 months. The CNM-Au8 and pridopidine EAPs are ongoing. DISCUSSION: Multicenter EAPs conducted in parallel to randomized clinical trials for ALS can successfully enroll participants who do not qualify for clinical trials.
Assuntos
Esclerose Lateral Amiotrófica , Esclerose Lateral Amiotrófica/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Drogas em Investigação/uso terapêutico , United States Food and Drug Administration , Adulto , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de SaúdeRESUMO
Importance: The US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) accelerated approval pathway allows approval of investigational drugs treating unmet medical needs based on changes to surrogate measures considered "reasonably likely" to predict clinical benefit. Postapproval clinical trials are then required to confirm whether these drugs offer clinical benefit. Objective: To determine whether cancer drugs granted accelerated approval ultimately demonstrate clinical benefit and to evaluate the basis of conversion to regular approval. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, publicly available FDA data were used to identify cancer drugs granted accelerated approval from 2013 to 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Demonstrated improvement in quality of life or overall survival in accelerated approvals with more than 5 years of follow-up, as well as confirmatory trial end points and time to conversion for drug-indication pairs converted to regular approval. Results: A total of 129 cancer drug-indication pairs were granted accelerated approval from 2013 to 2023. Among 46 indications with more than 5 years of follow-up (approved 2013-2017), approximately two-thirds (29, 63%) were converted to regular approval, 10 (22%) were withdrawn, and 7 (15%) remained ongoing after a median of 6.3 years. Fewer than half (20/46, 43%) demonstrated a clinical benefit in confirmatory trials. Time to withdrawal decreased from 9.9 years to 3.6 years, and time to regular approval increased from 1.6 years to 3.6 years. Among 48 drug-indication pairs converted to regular approval, 19 (40%) were converted based on overall survival, 21 (44%) on progression-free survival, 5 (10%) on response rate plus duration of response, 2 (4%) on response rate, and 1 (2%) despite a negative confirmatory trial. Comparing accelerated and regular approval indications, 18 of 48 (38%) were unchanged, while 30 of 48 (63%) had different indications (eg, earlier line of therapy). Conclusions and Relevance: Most cancer drugs granted accelerated approval did not demonstrate benefit in overall survival or quality of life within 5 years of accelerated approval. Patients should be clearly informed about the cancer drugs that use the accelerated approval pathway and do not end up showing benefits in patient-centered clinical outcomes.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Aprovação de Drogas , Neoplasias , United States Food and Drug Administration , Humanos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Estudos de Coortes , Aprovação de Drogas/legislação & jurisprudência , Aprovação de Drogas/métodos , Drogas em Investigação/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Qualidade de Vida , Análise de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislação & jurisprudência , SeguimentosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Acne vulgaris is one of the most prevalent diseases worldwide with a considerably high cost and a burden on quality of life. There are currently many topical and systemic therapies for acne; however, many are limited by their local adverse event profile. This review provides an update on current, novel Phase I and II trials for acne vulgaris. AREAS COVERED: This review searched the National Institutes of Health US National Library of Medicine online database of clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.gov) for ongoing Phase I and II trials. Only papers discussing novel therapies were discussed, and combinations of previously FDA-approved drugs were excluded. EXPERT OPINION: The current investigational approaches to acne treatment reflect an attempt to mitigate the underlying cause of acne pathogenesis. By targeting key mechanisms involved, studies aim to show long-term improvement with less frequent treatment use. This provides potential for more tolerable treatments with better patient adherence, in turn leading to increased efficacy.
Assuntos
Acne Vulgar , Drogas em Investigação , Humanos , Acne Vulgar/tratamento farmacológico , Acne Vulgar/patologia , Drogas em Investigação/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Sjögren's syndrome is a heterogeneous autoimmune condition that impairs quality of life because of dryness, fatigue, pain, and systemic involvements. Current treatment largely depends on empirical evidence, with no effective therapy approved. Clinical trials on targeted drugs often fail to report efficacy due to common factors. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes the pathogenesis and what caused the failure of new investigational drugs in clinical trials, highlighting solutions for more effective investigations, with greater consistency between research outcomes, clinical use, and patient needs. EXPERT OPINION: Unlinked pathobiology with symptoms resulted in misidentified targets and disappointing trials. Useful stratification tools are necessary for the heterogeneous SS patients. Composite endpoints or improvements in ESSDAI scores are needed, considering the high placebo response, and the unbalance between symptom burden and disease activity. Compared to classic biologics, targeted cell therapy will be a more promising field of investigation in the coming years.
Assuntos
Síndrome de Sjogren , Humanos , Síndrome de Sjogren/tratamento farmacológico , Drogas em Investigação/farmacologia , Drogas em Investigação/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de Vida , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , DorRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) has a significant impact on society and quality of life. Current treatments are ineffective, and new investigational drugs are necessary. AREAS COVERED: Numerous potential therapies are developing, targeting different areas such as cannabinoid signaling, opioid receptors, tachykinin (NK2) receptors, ß3-adrenergic receptors, intestinal microbiota, inflammation, and 5HT receptors. Clinical trial evidence has shown that loperamide, eluxadoline, alosetron, ramosetron, bile acid sequestrants, and rifaximin can modulate GI alterations and benefit patients with IBS-D. Among the potential therapies, ibodutant, ibudilast, blautix, BOS-589, solabegron, vibegron, olorinab, ebastine, and ORP-101 have demonstrated possible effects but remain confirmed. EXPERT OPINION: Individuals with IBS-D require cost-effective treatment options that do not impede their productivity or that of their caregivers. This is necessary for consistent healthcare and improved quality of life. Therefore, we should focus on developing new, efficient, and affordable medications for IBS-D. The government, insurers, and society must recognize this need and collaborate to ensure its fulfillment.
Assuntos
Compostos Heterocíclicos com 2 Anéis , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável , Humanos , Diarreia/tratamento farmacológico , Drogas em Investigação/farmacologia , Drogas em Investigação/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/farmacologia , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/uso terapêutico , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/tratamento farmacológico , Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos como AssuntoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Anal cancer, a rare malignancy accounting for 2.5-3.0% of gastrointestinal cancers, primarily manifests as squamous cell carcinoma associated with HPV. Recent years have witnessed significant advancements in managing squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA), particularly with the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and randomized data on front-line chemotherapy. AREAS COVERED: This review discusses the current standard treatments for both early and advanced SCCA, based on published data. The authors then describe the new approaches, focusing on ICI combinations, targeted agents, T-cell adoptive therapy, and HPV-therapeutic vaccines. EXPERT OPINION: The current standard treatment for SCCA includes front-line carboplatin and paclitaxel, with pembrolizumab and nivolumab as later-line options. While modified DCF has shown promise in single-arm studies, its role as a front-line therapy requires confirmation through randomized data. We eagerly anticipate the results of phase 3 trials investigating the front-line chemo-immunotherapy for metastatic SCCA and ICI consolidation following chemoradiation for early-stage SCCA. Novel approaches like T-cell adoptive therapy, HPV-therapeutic vaccines, and bifunctional antibodies combined with HPV vaccines are in early-stage trials for HPV-mediated tumors, including HPV-positive SCCA. These approaches targeting HPV epitopes may eventually gain tumor-agnostic approval, although their role in SCCA may take time to establish.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Ânus , Drogas em Investigação , Humanos , Neoplasias do Ânus/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias do Ânus/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamento farmacológico , Drogas em Investigação/farmacologia , Drogas em Investigação/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Vacinas , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is widespread throughout the world, with a high social and health impact. It is considered a 'silent killer' for its sudden onset without symptoms in the early stages of the disease. The main goal of nephrologists is to slow the progression of kidney disease and treat the associated symptoms with a range of new medications. AREAS COVERED: The aim of this systematic review is to analyze the new investigational drugs for the treatment of chronic renal failure. Data were obtained from the available scientific literature and from the ClinicalTrials.gov website. EXPERT OPINION: Among the drugs currently being researched, SGLT2 inhibitors appear to be the most promising drugs for the treatment of CKD, has they have slower progression of CKD and protection of cardiorenal function. An important role in the future of CKD treatment is played by autologous cell-therapy, which appears to be a new frontier in the treatment of CKD. Other therapeutic strategies are currently being investigated and have been shown to slow the progression of CKD. However, further studies are needed to determine whether these approaches may offer benefits in slowing the progression of CKD in the near future.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Falência Renal Crônica , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Inibidores do Transportador 2 de Sódio-Glicose , Humanos , Drogas em Investigação/uso terapêutico , Falência Renal Crônica/prevenção & controle , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores do Transportador 2 de Sódio-Glicose/farmacologia , Inibidores do Transportador 2 de Sódio-Glicose/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Overactive bladder syndrome is a common chronic condition with a significant impact on quality of life and economic burden. Persistence with pharmacologic therapy has been limited by efficacy and side effects. A greater understanding of the pathophysiology of overactive bladder has led to the initial evaluation of several drugs affecting ion channels, the autonomic nervous system, and enzymes which may provide useful alternatives for the management of overactive bladder. AREAS COVERED: A comprehensive review was performed using PubMed and Cochrane databases as well as reviewing clinical trials in the United States. The current standard of care for overactive bladder will be discussed, but this paper focuses on investigational drugs currently in preclinical studies and phase I and II clinical trials. EXPERT OPINION: Current therapies for overactive bladder have limitations in efficacy and side effects. A greater understanding of the pathophysiology of overactive bladder has identified the role(s) of other pathways in the overactive bladder syndrome. Targeting alternative pathways including ion channels and enzymes may provide alternative therapies of overactive bladder and a more tailored approach to the management of overactive bladder.
Assuntos
Drogas em Investigação , Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa , Animais , Humanos , Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos , Drogas em Investigação/farmacologia , Drogas em Investigação/uso terapêutico , Canais Iônicos/efeitos dos fármacos , Canais Iônicos/metabolismo , Qualidade de Vida , Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa/tratamento farmacológico , Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa/fisiopatologia , Agentes Urológicos/uso terapêutico , Agentes Urológicos/farmacologia , Ensaios Clínicos Fase I como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como AssuntoRESUMO
Summary Notwithstanding its approval by the National Committee for Ethics in Research (Conep) on April 19, 2016, a trial of the so-called "synthetic" phosphoethanolamine (syn-phospho) pill in cancer patients raises ethical concerns. An analysis by a laboratory contracted by the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MCTI) revealed that syn-phospho contained a great amount of impurities and did not meet standards of pharmaceutical quality required for an investigational drug. Cytotoxicity against human tumor cell lines and in vivo rodent xenograft tumor assays consistently failed to demonstrate a potential anticancer activity of syn-phospho. Preclinical safety studies of syn-phospho were also insufficient to support a trial of this investigational drug in cancer patients. Moreover, the ethical approval decision apparently overlooked two previous findings that suggested a possible enhancement of mammary carcinoma cell proliferation by phosphoethanolamine, and an apparent increase in lung metastases (rat implanted tumor assay) by syn-phospho. The syn-phospho risk-benefit ratio is clearly unfavorable and, thus, this trial in cancer patients does not fulfill a key requirement to make a clinical research ethical. There are also concerns regarding whether the study design is robust enough (scientific validity), and the social value of the trial of syn-phospho in cancer patients is questionable.
Resumo Não obstante a sua aprovação pela Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa (Conep) em 19 de abril de 2016, um ensaio da pílula de fosfoetanolamina "sintética" (sin-fosfo) em pacientes com câncer levanta preocupações éticas. Uma análise feita por um laboratório contratado pelo Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (MCTI) revelou que a sin-fosfo continha grande quantidade de impurezas e não satisfazia os padrões de qualidade farmacêutica exigidos para um medicamento experimental. Os ensaios de citotoxicidade com linhagens de células originárias de tumores humanos e testes in vivo em roedores com tumores xeno-enxertados falharam consistentemente em demonstrar uma potencial atividade anticâncer da sin-fosfo. Os estudos pré-clínicos de segurança da sin-fosfo também foram insuficientes para apoiar a realização de um ensaio desse medicamento experimental em pacientes com câncer. Além disso, a aprovação ética aparentemente desconsiderou dois achados anteriores, sugerindo uma possível exacerbação da proliferação de células de carcinoma de mama pela fosfoetanolamina, e um aparente aumento de metástases pulmonares (ensaio de tumores implantados em ratos) pela sin-fosfo. A relação risco-benefício é claramente desfavorável para a sin-fosfo e, portanto, esse ensaio em pacientes com câncer não atende um requisito essencial para que uma pesquisa clínica seja ética. Há também preocupações quanto ao delineamento do estudo ser suficientemente robusto (validade interna), e o valor social do ensaio da sin-fosfo em pacientes com câncer é questionável.
Assuntos
Humanos , Drogas em Investigação/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/ética , Etanolaminas/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Brasil , Medição de Risco , Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa , Experimentação Humana Terapêutica/ética , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos/éticaRESUMO
Abstract Lymphoproliferative disorders have increased in last decades. Immunohistochemistry analysis is required to categorize them in different clinical entities, as has been stablished by WHO. Advances in imaging have set the PET-CT as a standard staging procedure in most cases. Knowledge of the biology of these malignancies has allowed therapeutic advances with different approaches, including development of monoclonal antibodies, conjugated antibodies, immunomodulatory agents, as well as inhibition of specific pathways. Although new drugs are promising, the cost-benefit impact requires to be evaluated in pharmacoeconomic clinical trials.
Resumen Los padecimientos linfoproliferativos han incrementado en las últimas décadas. Es fundamental la evaluación con inmunohistoquímica para clasificarlos en las diferentes entidades que establece la clasificación de la OMS. Los avances en técnicas de imagen han colocado al PET-CT como un procedimiento de estadificación estándar. El conocimiento de la biología de estas neoplasias ha permitido avances terapéuticos con el desarrollo de anticuerpos monoclonales solos o conjugados, como agentes inmunomoduladores, así como a través de la inhibición de vías específicas. Aun cuando los resultados con estos nuevos fármacos son promisorios, el impacto costo-beneficio requiere evaluarse en estudios prospectivos con análisis farmacoeconómico.
Assuntos
Humanos , Linfoma/diagnóstico , Linfoma/terapia , Diagnóstico por Imagem/tendências , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Drogas em Investigação/uso terapêutico , Gerenciamento Clínico , Terapias em Estudo , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Imunoterapia , Linfoma/epidemiologia , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/diagnóstico , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/terapia , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/epidemiologia , Oncologia/tendênciasRESUMO
A continuidade do tratamento com os medicamentos investigacionais após a conclusão de uma pesquisa clínica vem sendo discutida desde o final dos anos 1980, inicialmente em associação a estudos na área da Síndrome de Imunodeficiência Adquirida e, particularmente, em países em desenvolvimento, onde a vulnerabilidade dos participantes de pesquisa é maior. Diretrizes nacionais e internacionais fazem referência ao tema do acesso pós-pesquisa; entretanto, a complexidade do assunto não é facilmente endereçada e usualmente demanda discussões adicionais e específicas. A decisão sobre o fornecimento do medicamento após a pesquisa deve passar, no mínimo, por avaliações de eficácia e segurança, considerando tratar-se de um medicamento ainda experimental. Cada pesquisa deve ter avaliação própria, levando-se em consideração a doença em questão, assim como a população do estudo e suas necessidades. Desta forma, a natureza da obrigação pós-pesquisa não pode ser considerada a mesma em todas as situações e contextos, mas deve-se assegurar que a relação criada entre pesquisadores e pacientes durante uma pesquisa clínica seja sempre terminada com responsabilidade e respeito.
The post-trial access to investigational drugs has been the object of discussion since the late 1980s at least, initially linked to trials carried out in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and, particularly, in developing countries, where the concern with patient vulnerability is more important. National and international guidelines do mention the subject; however, the complexity of the issue is not easily addressed and usually requires additional and specific discussions. The decision on providing the investigational drug after the trial shall rest on at least two dimensions: efficacy and safety assessments, as the new drug is still on the experimental phase. Each clinical trial shall have its own assessment, taking into account the disease being studied, as well as the study population and their specific needs. Therefore, the nature of post-trial obligations cannot be considered the same in all situations and contexts; nevertheless, it should be assured that the relationship developed between investigators and patients during the study must be always terminated with respect and responsibility.
Assuntos
Humanos , Pesquisa Biomédica , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente , Drogas em Investigação/uso terapêutico , Experimentação Humana , Pesquisa Biomédica/legislação & jurisprudência , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/legislação & jurisprudência , Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa , Experimentação Humana/legislação & jurisprudência , Guias de Prática Clínica como AssuntoRESUMO
O presente artigo descreve os aspectos metodológicos, regulatórios e éticos das diferentes formas de acesso a drogas ainda experimentais em situações assistenciais - extensão de pesquisa, uso compassivo e acesso expandido. Em todo o mundo, essa modalidade de assistência tem como principais desafios o estabelecimento de critérios mínimos de qualificação tanto dos pesquisadores quanto das instituições para que possam realizar projetos envolvendo novas drogas em suas diferentes fases, a capacitação dos membros dos comitês de avaliação de projetos quanto aos aspectos metodológicos, regulatórios e éticos envolvidos na pesquisa de novas drogas, a explicitação das relações entre pesquisadores e patrocinadores e entre pesquisadores e participantes da pesquisa e a oposição quanto à recente proposta de possibilitar aos fabricantes de medicamentos a cobrança pelas drogas utilizadas em projetos de pesquisa.
This article describes the methodological, regulatory, and ethical aspects of the different therapeutic uses of investigational drugs-research extension, compassionate use, and expanded access. Worldwide, the principle challenges of this kind of treatment are: setting minimum quality standards for researchers, as well as institutions, so that projects can include drugs at various stages of development; training of evaluation and assessment committees on the methodological, regulatory, and ethical aspects of new drug research; clearly outlining the relationship between researchers and funding organizations and between researchers and study participants; and understanding the opposition to the recent proposal to enable drug manufacturers to charge for drugs used in research studies.
Assuntos
Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Drogas em Investigação/uso terapêutico , Aplicação de Novas Drogas em Teste , Brasil , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Estudos de Coortes , Empatia , Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa , Ética em Pesquisa , União Europeia , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMO
Um estudo duplo cego com 96 pacientes, divididos em quatro grupos, foi realizado com intuito de avaliar a eficácia do medicamento Listerine no controle da placa bacteriana e da gengivite. Para cada grupo foi entregue um lote de medicamentos identificados por letras, onde apenas o coordenador e o fabricante sabiam qual era o Listerine e qual o placebo. Cada grupo possuia um examinador que executou o índice de placa gengival e, após dois meses, o mesmo examinador realizou os mesmos indices para comparaçäo. Os resultados revelaram que o medicamento Listerine parace näo justificar sua utilizaçäo frente ao controle da placa da inflamaçäo gengival