Making the coronary care unit cost-effective.

Coronary care units (CCUs) have now been in use for 20 years, and it is generally acknowledged that they have helped to reduce hospital mortality for patients with acute myocardial infarction. In recent years the indications for admission to a CCU have been greatly expanded to include all patients with suspected myocardial infarction and a variety of other manifestations of cardiovascular disease including primary arrhythmias and heart failure. The focus of the CCU has also broadened to include the prevention of major complications and the use of a variety of invasive and noninvasive diagnostic and therapeutic interventions before, as well as in response to, complications. With the changing indications for CCU admissions and the changing use of the CCU, new problems have arisen. The number of patients who might benefit from CCU care is now much larger and may at any given time greatly exceed the number of beds available. Decisions regarding who should be admitted to the CCU, how long a patient should stay in the CCU and which of the large and growing armamentarium of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions should be used are now increasingly important. These decisions have not only medical but also economic implications. Based on a 5-year experience with an intensive care unit computer data bank, strategies for more cost-effective CCU use have been explored. This has involved identification of high- and low-risk subsets of patients and modifications of standard operating procedures. The common clinical problems of chest pain, arrhythmias, syncope, pulmonary edema and myocardial infarction will be used as examples.

Non-invasive pressure support ventilation and CPAP in cardiogenic pulmonary edema: a multicenter randomized study in the emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: Noninvasive pressure support ventilation (NIPSV) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) are both advocated in the treatment of cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE); however, the superiority of one technique over the other has not been clearly demonstrated. With regard to its physiological effects, we hypothesized that NIPSV would be better than CPAP in terms of clinical benefit. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, controlled study performed in four emergency departments, 200 patients were assigned to CPAP (n = 101) or NIPSV (n = 99). Primary outcome was combined events of hospital death and tracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes included resolution time, myocardial infarction rate, and length of hospital stay. Separate analysis was performed in patients with hypercapnia and those with high B-type natriuretic peptide (>500 pg/ml). RESULTS: Hospital death occurred in 5 (5.0%) patients receiving NIPSV and 3 (2.9%) patients receiving CPAP (p = 0.56). The need for intubation was observed in 6 (6%) patients in the NIPSV group and 4 (3.9%) patients in the CPAP group (p = 0.46). Combined events were similar in both groups. NIPSV was associated to a shorter resolution time compared to CPAP (159 ± 54 vs. 210 ± 73 min; p < 0.01), whereas the incidence of new myocardial infarction was not different between both groups. Similar results were found in hypercapnic patients and those with high B-type natriuretic peptide. CONCLUSIONS: During CPE, NIPSV accelerates the improvement of respiratory failure compared to CPAP but does not affect primary clinical outcome either in overall population or in subgroups of patients with hypercapnia or those with high B-type natriuretic peptide.

Hospital treatment for fluid overload in the Medicare hemodialysis population.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Fluid overload in hemodialysis patients sometimes requires emergent dialysis, but the magnitude of this care has not been characterized. This study aimed to estimate the magnitude of fluid overload treatment episodes for the Medicare hemodialysis population in hospital settings, including emergency departments. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Point-prevalent hemodialysis patients were identified from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Renal Management Information System and Standard Analytical Files. Fluid overload treatment episodes were defined by claims for care in inpatient, hospital observation, or emergency department settings with primary discharge diagnoses of fluid overload, heart failure, or pulmonary edema, and dialysis performed on the day of or after admission. Exclusion criteria included stays >5 days. Cost was defined as total Medicare allowable costs for identified episodes. Associations between patient characteristics and episode occurrence and cost were analyzed. RESULTS: For 25,291 patients (14.3%), 41,699 care episodes occurred over a mean follow-up time of 2 years: 86% inpatient, 9% emergency department, and 5% hospital observation. Heart failure was the primary diagnosis in 83% of episodes, fluid overload in 11%, and pulmonary edema in 6%. Characteristics associated with more frequent events included age <45 years, female sex, African-American race, causes of ESRD other than diabetes, dialysis duration of 1 to 3 years, fewer dialysis sessions per week at baseline, hospitalizations during baseline, and most comorbid conditions. Average cost was $6,372 per episode; total costs were approximately $266 million. CONCLUSIONS: Among U.S. hemodialysis patients, fluid overload treatment is common and expensive. Further study is necessary to identify prevention opportunities.

Estimates of cost-effectiveness of prehospital continuous positive airway pressure in the management of acute pulmonary edema.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in managing prehospital acute pulmonary edema in an urban EMS system. METHODS: Using estimates from published reports on prehospital and emergency department CPAP, a cost-effectiveness model of implementing CPAP in a typical urban EMS system was derived from the societal perspective as well as the perspective of the implementing EMS system. To assess the robustness of the model, a series of univariate and multivariate sensitivity analyses was performed on the input variables. RESULTS: The cost of consumables, equipment, and training yielded a total cost of $89 per CPAP application. The theoretical system would be expected to use CPAP 4 times per 1000 EMS patients and is expected to save 0.75 additional lives per 1000 EMS patients at a cost of $490 per life saved. CPAP is also expected to result in approximately one less intubation per 6 CPAP applications and reduce hospitalization costs by $4075 per year for each CPAP application. Through sensitivity analyses the model was verified to be robust across a wide range of input variable assumptions. CONCLUSION: Previous studies have demonstrated the clinical effectiveness of CPAP in the management of acute pulmonary edema. Through a theoretical analysis which modeled the costs and clinical benefits of implementing CPAP in an urban EMS system, prehospital CPAP appears to be a cost-effective treatment.

The use of "quality-adjusted life years" (QALYs) to evaluate treatment in intensive care.

This study examines the feasibility of using Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) to assess patient outcome and the economic justification of treatment in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). 248 patients were followed for three years after admission. Survival and quality of life for each patient was evaluated. Outcome for each patient was quantified in discounted Quality-Adjusted Life Years (dQALYs). The economic justification of treatment was evaluated by comparing the total and marginal cost per dQALY for this patient group with the published cost per QALY for other medical interventions. 150 patients were alive after three years. Quality of life for most longterm survivors was good. Patient outcome (QALYs) was greatest for asthma and trauma patients, and least for cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. The tentative estimated cost-effectiveness of treatment varied from AUD $297 per QALY for asthma to AUD $2323 per QALY for patients with pulmonary oedema. This compares favourably with many preventative and non-acute medical treatments. Although the methodology is developmental, the measurement of patient outcome using QALYs appears to be feasible in a general hospital ICU.