Cerebrovascular Complications of COVID-19 and COVID-19 Vaccination.

The risk of stroke and cerebrovascular disease complicating infection with SARS-CoV-2 has been extensively reported since the onset of the pandemic. The striking efforts of many scientists in cooperation with regulators and governments worldwide have rapidly brought the development of a large landscape of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. The novel DNA and mRNA vaccines have offered great flexibility in terms of antigen production and led to an unprecedented rapidity in effective and safe vaccine production. However, as mass vaccination has progressed, rare but catastrophic cases of thrombosis have occurred in association with thrombocytopenia and antibodies against PF4 (platelet factor 4). This catastrophic syndrome has been named vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. Rarely, ischemic stroke can be the symptom onset of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia or can complicate the course of the disease. In this review, we provide an overview of stroke and cerebrovascular disease as a complication of the SARS-CoV-2 infection and outline the main clinical and radiological characteristics of cerebrovascular complications of vaccinations, with a focus on vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. Based on the available data from the literature and from our experience, we propose a therapeutic protocol to manage this challenging condition. Finally, we highlight the overlapping pathophysiologic mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination leading to thrombosis.

Platelet phosphatidylserine is the critical mediator of thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a severe immune-mediated prothrombotic disorder caused by antibodies (Ab) reactive to complexes of platelet factor 4 and heparin. Platelets (PLT) and their interaction with different immune cells contribute to prothrombotic conditions in HIT. However, the exact mechanisms and the role of different PLT subpopulations in this prothrombotic environment remain poorly understood. In this study, we observed that HIT patient Ab induce a new PLT population that is characterized by increased P-selectin expression and phosphatidylserine (PS) externalization. Formation of this procoagulant PLT subpopulation was dependent on engagement of PLT Fc-γ-RIIA by HIT Ab and resulted in a significant increase of thrombin generation on the PLT surface. Using an ex vivo thrombosis model and multi-parameter assessment of thrombus formation, we observed that HIT Ab-induced procoagulant PLT propagated formation of large PLT aggregates, leukocyte recruitment and most importantly, fibrin network generation. These prothrombotic conditions were prevented via the upregulation of PLT intracellular cAMP with Iloprost, a clinically approved prostacyclin analogue. Additionally, the functional relevance of P-selectin and PS was dissected. While inhibition of P-selectin did not affect thrombus formation, the specific blockade of PS prevented HIT Ab-mediated thrombin generation and most importantly procoagulant PLT-mediated thrombus formation ex vivo. Taken together, our findings indicate that procoagulant PLT are critical mediators of prothrombotic conditions in HIT. Specific PS targeting could be a promising therapeutic approach to prevent thromboembolic events in HIT patients.

Laboratory diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: A retrospective experience.

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a severe complication of heparin therapy associated with thrombosis that requires a quick diagnosis. Therefore, laboratory assays must provide an accurate and swift answer. This work aims to evaluate the performances of an ELISA assay, especially when combined with 4T risk score, and a functional assay. METHODS: Data were collected for 894 patients treated by heparin who underwent anticoagulant switch because of HIT suspicion and were examined by a multidisciplinary expert team who confirmed or ruled out HIT diagnosis. All patients were tested for anti-PF4 IgG with Asserachrom HPIA IgG (ELISA), and 307 were tested with a platelet aggregation test done on platelet-rich plasma (PRP-PAT). The 4T risk score was available for 607 of them. RESULTS: HIT was diagnosed in 232 patients. 4T risk score had a 94.2% negative predictive value (NPV) for risk scores ≤3 and 77.3% for risk scores ≤5. The sensitivity of ELISA was 90.9%, its specificity 79.0%, and its NPV 96.1%. When combined with 4T risk score, its NPV reached 100% and 97% for risk scores ≤3 and ≤5, respectively. PRP-PAT sensitivity was 70.4%, and its specificity was 92.3%. Combination of ELISA and PRP-PAT had a 0.7% false-negative rate. CONCLUSION: This study shows that ELISA can rule out HIT with an excellent NPV, especially when combined with the 4T risk score. Nonetheless, it has low specificity; hence, it needs to be associated with a functional assay.

The deglycosylated form of 1E12 inhibits platelet activation and prothrombotic effects induced by VITT antibodies.

In order to improve the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, there is an urgent need to unravel the pathogenesis of vaccineinduced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), a severe complication of recombinant adenoviral vector vaccines used to prevent COVID-19, and likely due to anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) IgG antibodies. In this study, we demonstrated that 1E12, a chimeric anti-PF4 antibody with a human Fc fragment, fully mimics the effects of human VITT antibodies, as it activates platelets to a similar level in the presence of platelet factor 4 (PF4). Incubated with neutrophils, platelets and PF4, 1E12 also strongly induces NETosis, and in a microfluidic model of whole blood thrombosis, it triggers the formation of large platelet/leukocyte thrombi containing fibrin(ogen). In addition, a deglycosylated form of 1E12 (DG-1E12), which still binds PF4 but no longer interacts with Fcγ receptors, inhibits platelet, granulocyte and clotting activation induced by human anti-PF4 VITT antibodies. This strongly supports that 1E12 and VITT antibodies recognize overlapping epitopes on PF4. In conclusion, 1E12 is a potentially important tool to study the pathophysiology of VITT, and for establishing mouse models. On the other hand, DG-1E12 may help the development of a new drug that specifically neutralizes the pathogenic effect of autoimmune anti-PF4 antibodies, such as those associated with VITT.

Understanding vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT).

Vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a rare, but serious, syndrome characterised by thrombocytopenia, thrombosis, a markedly raised D-dimer and the presence of anti-platelet factor-4 (PF4) antibodies following COVID-19 adenovirus vector vaccination. VITT occurs at a rate of approximately 2 per 100 000 first-dose vaccinations and appears exceedingly rare following second doses. Our current understanding of VITT pathogenesis is based on the observations that patients with VITT have antibodies that bind to PF4 and have the ability to form immune complexes that induce potent platelet activation. However, the precise mechanisms that lead to pathogenic VITT antibody development remain a source of active investigation. Thrombosis in VITT can manifest in any vascular bed and affect multiple sites simultaneously. While there is a predilection for splanchnic and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, VITT also commonly presents with deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Pillars of management include anticoagulation with a non-heparin anticoagulant, intravenous immunoglobulin and 'rescue' therapies, such as plasma exchange for severe cases. VITT can be associated with a high mortality rate and significant morbidity, but awareness and optimal therapy have significantly improved outcomes in Australia. A number of questions remain unanswered, including why VITT is so rare, reasons for the predilection for thrombosis in unusual sites, how long pathological antibodies persist, and the optimal duration of anticoagulation. This review will provide an overview of the presentation, diagnostic workup and management strategies for patients with VITT.

Uncommon thrombotic complications after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Shortly after the worldwide initiation of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, concerns emerged about a possible link between vaccination, severe thrombocytopenia, and the development of atypical venous thrombosis. Concerns were primarily about AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCov-19), later Johnson & Johnson (Ad26.COV2.S), but cases of acute immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) and bleeding without thrombosis and also atypical venous thrombosis after exposure to the messenger RNA-based vaccines produced by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna have been reported. Examination of the circumstances of these complications revealed that this is a similar mechanism to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a prothrombotic thrombocytopenic hypercoagulable disorder with venous and arterial thrombosis. HIT is caused by platelet-activating IgG antibodies directed against an antigen that is a macromolecular complex consisting of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. Naming this new entity vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) was suggested to avoid confusion with HIT. Patients had high levels of antibodies to the immune complex formed by PF 4 and the polyanionic component of the vaccine (double-stranded DNA). In patients with thrombosis at any vascular site after vaccination, accompanied by absolute or relative thrombocytopenia and systemic manifestations, HIT Ig ELISA assay to detect antibodies against PF4 and platelet-activating functional tests may be used for VITT recognition and differentiation from venous thromboembolic disease. Immune globulin impedes antibody-mediated platelet clearance and down-regulate platelet activation by immune complexes, as in HIT. It is prudent to choose from among the nonheparin antithrombotic agents - direct oral F.Xa inhibitors, direct thrombin inhibitors and indirect F.Xa inhibitors for the treatment of thrombosis.

Critical role for mouse marginal zone B cells in PF4/heparin antibody production.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated disorder that can cause fatal arterial or venous thrombosis/thromboembolism. Immune complexes consisting of platelet factor 4 (PF4), heparin, and PF4/heparin-reactive antibodies are central to the pathogenesis of HIT. However, the B-cell origin of HIT antibody production is not known. Here, we show that anti-PF4/heparin antibodies are readily generated in wild-type mice on challenge with PF4/heparin complexes, and that antibody production is severely impaired in B-cell-specific Notch2-deficient mice that lack marginal zone (MZ) B cells. As expected, Notch2-deficient mice responded normally to challenge with T-cell-dependent antigen nitrophenyl-chicken γ globulin but not to the T-cell-independent antigen trinitrophenyl-Ficoll. In addition, wild-type, but not Notch2-deficient, B cells plus B-cell-depleted wild-type splenocytes adoptively transferred into B-cell-deficient µMT mice responded to PF4/heparin complex challenge. PF4/heparin-specific antibodies produced by wild-type mice were IgG2b and IgG3 isotypes. An in vitro class-switching assay showed that MZ B cells were capable of producing antibodies of IgG2b and IgG3 isotypes. Lastly, MZ, but not follicular, B cells adoptively transferred into B-cell-deficient µMT mice responded to PF4/heparin complex challenge by producing PF4/heparin-specific antibodies of IgG2b and IgG3 isotypes. Taken together, these data demonstrate that MZ B cells are critical for PF4/heparin-specific antibody production.

[Evaluation of a diagnostic test for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: validation of a delayed test time]. / Évaluation d'un test d'orientation diagnostique de thrombopénie induite à l'héparine : validation d'un délai différé de réalisation du test.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare, iatrogenic condition, characterized by its potential severity and diagnostic difficulties. The diagnosis is based on a set of arguments allowing the calculation of a pre-test score pointing to HIT. There are rapid diagnostic tests for suspected HIT. Among these, the STic Expert® HIT has a good sensitivity to detect HIT. However, it must be performed within 2 hours after sampling. The aim of this study was to evaluate a delayed STic Expert® HIT test at 8 hours and in frozen plasma. Thirty-six patients were prospectively included for HIT testing between April 01, 2018, and July 1, 2022, at the University Rouen Hospital. For any request for HIT testing, an analysis by STic Expert® HIT was performed within 2 hours and 8 hours post-sampling. Any positive result was confirmed by a functional test, platelet aggregation with heparin, release of 14C-serotonin assay (SRA), and immunological assay by a research for anti-platelet factor 4 IgG antibodies. Twenty-three patients had a STic Expert® HIT. Sixteen presented platelet aggregations in the presence of heparin and had a positive anti-PF4 test, 17 had a positive SRA. Six patients had no HIT. For the test performed within 2 hours of collection, the Se = 100%, Sp = 68.42%, PPV = 73.91%, and NPV = 100%. The X2 = 18.21 with p < 0.001. For the test performed at 8 hours post sampling, the Se = 100%, Sp = 68.42%, PPV = 73.91% and NPV = 100%. The X2 = 18.21 with p < 0.001. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that the STic Expert® can be used to perform an HIT diagnostic test 8 hours after sampling and on thawed plasma. However, this study needs to be confirmed on a larger number of samples.

Functional Testing for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Using Whole Blood Multiplate Impedance Aggregometry.

Immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) occurs when heparin-dependent IgG antibodies bind to heparin/platelet factor 4 (H/PF4) complexes and activate platelets. There is a vast panoply of assays to investigate HIT which can be divided into two groups, antigen-based immunoassays that detect all antibodies against H/PF4 and are used as a first diagnostic step and functional assays that will identify only the antibodies capable of activating platelets and are mandatory to confirm a diagnosis of pathological HIT. The serotonin-release assay, known as SRA, has been the gold standard for decades, but in the last 10 years, other easier alternatives have been described. The current chapter will focus on whole blood multiple electrode aggregometry, a validated method for the functional diagnosis of HIT.

Heparin-Induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (HITT) and Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (VITT): Similar but Different.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) represents an autoimmune process whereby antibodies are formed against heparin in complex with platelet factor 4 (PF4) after heparin administration. These antibodies can be detected by a variety of immunological assays, including ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) and by chemiluminescence on the AcuStar instrument. However, pathological HIT antibodies are those that activate platelets in a platelet activation assay and cause thrombosis in vivo. We would tend to call this condition heparin-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (HITT), although some workers instead use the truncated abbreviation HIT. Vaccine-induced (immune) thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) instead reflects an autoimmune process whereby antibodies are formed against PF4 after administration of a vaccine, most notably adenovirus-based vaccines directed against COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019). Although both VITT and HITT reflect similar pathological processes, they have different origins and are detected in different ways. Most notable is that anti-PF4 antibodies in VITT can only be detected immunologically by ELISA assays, tending to be negative in rapid assays such as that using the AcuStar. Moreover, functional platelet activation assays otherwise used for HITT may need to be modified to detect platelet activation in VITT.

Serotonin Release Assay: Functional Assay for Heparin- and Vaccine-Induced (Immune) Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia.

The serotonin release assay (SRA) has been the gold-standard assay for detection of heparin-dependent platelet-activating antibodies and integral for the diagnosis for heparin-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (HIT). In 2021, a thrombotic thrombocytopenic syndrome was reported after adenoviral vector COVID-19 vaccination. This vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenic syndrome (VITT) proved to be a severe immune platelet activation syndrome manifested by unusual thrombosis, thrombocytopenia, very elevated plasma D-dimer, and a high mortality even with aggressive therapy (anticoagulation and plasma exchange). While the platelet-activating antibodies in both HIT and VITT are directed toward platelet factor 4 (PF4), important differences have been found. These differences have required modifications to the SRA to improve detection of functional VITT antibodies. Functional platelet activation assays remain essential in the diagnostic workup of HIT and VITT. Here we detail the application of SRA for the assessment of HIT and VITT antibodies.

Thrombotic anti-PF4 immune disorders: HIT, VITT, and beyond.

Antibodies against the chemokine platelet factor 4 (PF4) occur often, but only those that activate platelets induce severe prothrombotic disorders with associated thrombocytopenia. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is the prototypic anti-PF4 disorder, mediated by strong activation of platelets through their FcγIIa (immunoglobulin G [IgG]) receptors (FcγRIIa). Concomitant pancellular activation (monocytes, neutrophils, endothelium) triggers thromboinflammation with a high risk for venous and arterial thrombosis. The classic concept of HIT is that anti-PF4/heparin IgG, recognizing antigen sites on (cationic) PF4 that form in the presence of (anionic) heparin, constitute the heparin-dependent antibodies that cause HIT. Accordingly, HIT is managed by anticoagulation with a nonheparin anticoagulant. In 2021, adenovirus vector COVID-19 vaccines triggered the rare adverse effect "vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia" (VITT), also caused by anti-PF4 IgG. VITT is a predominantly heparin-independent platelet-activating disorder that requires both therapeutic-dose anticoagulation and inhibition of FcγRIIa-mediated platelet activation by high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). HIT and VITT antibodies bind to different epitopes on PF4; new immunoassays can differentiate between these distinct HIT-like and VITT-like antibodies. These studies indicate that (1) severe, atypical presentations of HIT ("autoimmune HIT") are associated with both HIT-like (heparin-dependent) and VITT-like (heparin-independent) anti-PF4 antibodies; (2) in some patients with severe acute (and sometimes chronic, recurrent) thrombosis, VITT-like antibodies can be identified independent of proximate heparin exposure or vaccination. We propose to classify anti-PF4 antibodies as type 1 (nonpathogenic, non- platelet activating), type 2 (heparin dependent, platelet activating), and type 3 (heparin independent, platelet activating). A key concept is that type 3 antibodies (autoimmune HIT, VITT) require anticoagulation plus an adjunct treatment, namely high-dose IVIG, to deescalate the severe anti-PF4 IgG-mediated hypercoagulability state.

A case series of recombinant platelet factor 4 for heparin reversal after cardiopulmonary bypass.

BACKGROUND: Platelet factor 4 (PF4) is released by activated platelets and has a strong affinity for heparin. Recombinant PF4 (rPF4) has been previously considered as an alternative to protamine for heparin reversal. However, it has been demonstrated that antibodies directed against the PF4/heparin moiety are important in the pathophysiologic development of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, a prothrombotic complication for which cardiac bypass patients are at increased risk. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a case series from an open-label, comparative phase I-II study of rPF4 and protamine after cardiac surgery to determine the heparin-reversal activity of different doses of IV rPF4. Sixteen patients received rPF4, and 5 received protamine. Activated clotting time (ACT) was used to monitor heparin reversal, with reversal defined as ACT <150 seconds. Platelets, white blood cells, C3a, C5a, fibrinopeptide A, von Willebrand factor antigen, and prothrombin fragment 1.2 were monitored postoperatively as indicators of coagulation and inflammation. RESULTS: Heparin reversal was successful by 10 minutes after administration of rPF4 as measured by ACT in all 16 patients. Specifically, a dose of 5 mg/kg rPF4 resulted in ACT <150 seconds after 5 minutes in 10 of 10 patients. For both treatment groups, there were no bleeding or thrombotic complications, no clinical thrombocytopenia after day 5, and no deaths within the 30-day study period. CONCLUSIONS: Our case series demonstrates that heparin anticoagulation was effectively reversed by the administration of rPF4 without serious complications. Additional studies are needed to further validate the safety and efficacy of exogenous rPF4 administration.

Association of trauma severity with antibody seroconversion in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: A multicenter, prospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND: Heparin administration can induce the production of anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies with platelet-activating properties, causing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Previous studies have suggested that trauma severity influences HIT immune responses, but their relationship has not been fully explained. This study aimed to clarify this association by multicenter prospective observational study. METHODS: Trauma patients who met the criteria of age 18 years or older and Injury Severity Scores (ISSs) of ≥9 from March 2018 to February 2019 were included. Patients who did not receive any heparin and those who received it as flushes or for treatment were also included. Patients were divided into three groups based on trauma severity (to mild [ISS 9-15], moderate [ISS 16-24], and severe injury groups [ISS ≥25]) and were compared by the seroconversion time and rate, as well as the disappearance rate of antibodies on day 30. RESULTS: A total of 184 patients were included: 55, 62, and 67 patients were classified into the mild, moderate, and severe injury groups, respectively. Overall, the seroconversion rates of anti-PF4/heparin immunoglobulin G (IgG) and HIT antibodies by washed platelet activation assay were 26.6% and 16.3%, respectively. There was a significant difference in the seroconversion rates of anti-PF4/heparin IgG ( p = 0.016) and HIT antibodies ( p = 0.046) among the groups. Seroconversion rates in both assays increased with increasing trauma severity. The time required to achieve seroconversion was similar (between 5 and 10 days of trauma onset) regardless of heparin administration. Anti-PF4/heparin IgG and HIT antibodies were no longer detected on day 30 in 28.6% and 60.9% of seroconverted patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Development of HIT antibodies was observed commonly in severely injured trauma patients. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibody development may be related to trauma severity, with a high disappearance frequency on day 30. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Breast cancer cell-based ELISA: a potential material for better detection of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by newly formed platelet-activating antibodies against complexes formed between platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin (H). HIT can result in life-threatening complications; thus, early detection of HIT antibodies is crucial for the treatment of the disease. The enzyme-linked immune absorbance assay (ELISA) for the identification of HIT antibodies is widely used in many laboratories, but in general, this test provides only ∼50% accuracy while other methods show multiple limitations. Here, we developed a new cell-based ELISA to improve the detection of HIT antibodies. Instead of immobilizing PF4 or PF4/H complexes directly onto a plate as in the standard ELISA, we added the complexes on breast cancer cells, i.e., cell line MDA-MB-231, and applied the same protocol for antibody detection. Using confocal laser scanning microscopy and flow cytometry for the characterization of bound complexes, we identified two types of HIT-mimicked antibodies (KKO and 1E12), which were able to differentiate from the non-HIT antibody (RTO). PF4-treated MDA-MB-231 cells allowed binding of HIT-mimicked antibodies better than PF4/H complexes. With human sera, the cell-based ELISA allowed better differentiation of clinically relevant from non-clinically relevant HIT antibodies as compared with the standard ELISA. Our findings provide a potential approach that contributes to the development of better assays for the detection of HIT antibodies.

Longitudinal Aspects of VITT.

In hundreds of patients worldwide, vaccination against COVID-19 with adenovirus vector vaccines (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19; Ad26.COV2.S) triggered platelet-activating anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies inducing vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). In most VITT patients, platelet-activating anti-PF4-antibodies are transient and the disorder is discrete and non-recurring. However, in some patients platelet-activating antibodies persist, associated with recurrent thrombocytopenia and sometimes with relapse of thrombosis despite therapeutic-dose anticoagulation. Anti-PF4 IgG antibodies measured by enzyme-immunoassay (EIA) are usually detectable for longer than platelet-activating antibodies in functional assays, but duration of detectability is highly assay-dependent. As more than 1 vaccination dose against COVID-19 is required to achieve sufficient protection, at least 69 VITT patients have undergone subsequent vaccination with an mRNA vaccine, with no relevant subsequent increase in anti-PF4 antibody titers, thrombocytopenia, or thrombotic complications. Also, re-exposure to adenoviral vector-based vaccines in 5 VITT patients was not associated with adverse reactions. Although data are limited, vaccination against influenza also appears to be safe. SARS-CoV-2 infection reported in 1 patient with preceding VITT did not influence anti-PF4 antibody levels. We discuss how these temporal characteristics of VITT provide insights into pathogenesis.

IgG-class anti-PF4/heparin antibodies and symptomatic DVT in orthopedic surgery patients receiving different anti-thromboembolic prophylaxis therapeutics.

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a thromboembolic complication that can occur with unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Our objective was to determine and compare the incidence of IgG-class HIT antibodies in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with different antithrombotic prophylaxis therapies and their contributions to the occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE). METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed for 374 Japanese patients undergoing THA or TKA to determine the incidence of VTE. IgG-class anti-PF4/heparin antibodies were measured using IgG-specific EIA before and after the operation. RESULTS: In the clinical outcome, the incidence of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was 15.0% (56/374, TKA; 35, THA; 21) and pulmonary emboli (PE) were not observed. The total seroconversion incidence of IgG-class PF4/heparin antibodies was 19.8% (74/374). The seroconversion incidence of IgG-class PF4/heparin antibodies was higher in patients receiving UFH (32.7%) compared to those receiving LMWH (9.5%) or fondaparinux (14.8%). Furthermore, the seroconversion incidence was significantly higher in patients undergoing TKA compared to those undergoing THA. Based on multivariate analysis, seroconversion of the IgG-class PF4/heparin antibodies was independent a risk factor for symptomatic DVT. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that the seroconversion of IgG-class anti-PF4/heparin antibodies differed with various anti-thrombotic prophylaxis therapeutics and was associated with the risk of DVT in a subset of patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TKA and THA).

Rivaroxaban--an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor--has potential for the management of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Rivaroxaban is an oral, direct activated Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor in advanced clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. Currently available anticoagulants include unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs); however, their use can be restricted by heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). HIT is usually caused by the production of antibodies to a complex of heparin and platelet factor-4 (PF4). This study was performed to evaluate, in vitro, the potential of rivaroxaban as an anticoagulant for the management of patients with HIT. UFH, the LMWH enoxaparin, fondaparinux and the direct thrombin inhibitor argatroban were tested to enable comparative analyses. Rivaroxaban did not cause platelet activation or aggregation in the presence of HIT antibodies, unlike UFH and enoxaparin, suggesting that rivaroxaban does not cross-react with HIT antibodies. Furthermore, rivaroxaban did not cause the release of PF4 from platelets and did not interact with PF4, unlike UFH and enoxaparin. These findings suggest that rivaroxaban may be a suitable anticoagulant for the management of patients with HIT.

Role of the platelet chemokine platelet factor 4 (PF4) in hemostasis and thrombosis.

Chemokines are a family of small proteins that have significant roles in inflammation, angiogenesis and cellular homing. Since inflammation and hemostasis/thrombosis have multiple overlapping roles and pathways, one could expect that some chemokines would also have biologically significant roles in hemostasis/thrombosis as well. This would especially be true for chemokines that are localized solely or predominantly within platelets and released in large amounts at sites of platelet activation such as platelet factor 4 (PF4, CXCL4) and its closely related chemokine, platelet basic protein (PBP, CXCL7). Our group and others have clearly demonstrated an in vivo role for PF4 in hemostasis/thrombosis, but not for PBP, which in contrast has clear proinflammatory properties. This review will focus on PF4 and its potential roles in hemostasis/thrombosis and the underlying pathways by which PF4 may be especially important in such pathologic thrombotic states as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and septic shock.