Examining the distribution of benefits of a free Maternal and Child Health programme in Enugu State, Nigeria: a benefit incidence analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the population groups that benefit from a Free Maternal and Child Health (FMCH) programme in Enugu State, South-east Nigeria, so as to understand the equity effects of the programme. METHOD: A community-based survey was conducted in rural and urban local government areas (LGAs) to aid the benefit incidence analysis (BIA) of the FMCH. Data were elicited from 584 randomly selected women of childbearing age. Data on their level of utilisation of FMCH services and their out-of-pocket expenditures on various FMCH services that they utilised were elicited. Benefits of the FMCH were valued using the unit cost of providing services while the net benefit was calculated by subtracting OOP expenditures made for services from the value of benefits. Costs were calculated in local currency (Naira (₦)) and converted to US Dollars. The net benefits were disaggregated by urban-rural locations and socio-economic status (SES). Concentration indices were computed to provide the level of SES inequity in BIA of FMCH. RESULTS: The total gross benefit incidence was ₦2.681 million ($7660). The gross benefit that was consumed by the urban dwellers was ₦1.581 million ($4517.1), while the rural dwellers consumed gross benefits worth ₦1.1 million ($3608.20). However, OOP expenditure for the supposedly FMCH was ₦6 527 580 (US$18 650.2) in the urban area, while it was ₦3, 194, 706 (US$ 9127.7) among rural dwellers. There was negative benefit incidence for the FMCH because the OOP exceeded the gross benefits at the point of use of services. There was no statistically significant difference in the benefit incidence and OOP expenditure between the urban and rural dwellers and across socio-economic groups. CONCLUSION: The distribution of the gross benefits of the FMCH programme indicates that it may not have achieved the desired aim of enhanced access particularly to the low-income population. Crucially, the high level of OOP erased whatever societal gain the FMCH was developed to provide. Hence, there is a need to review its implementation and re-strategise to reduce OOP and achieve greater access for improved effectiveness of the programme.

OBJECTIF: Déterminer les groupes de population qui bénéficient d'un programme de santé maternelle et infantile gratuite (F-MCH) dans l'Etat d'Enugu, dans le sud-est du Nigéria, afin de comprendre les effets du programme sur l'équité. MÉTHODE: Une enquête communautaire a été menée dans des zones locales gouvernementales (ZLG) rurales et urbaines pour faciliter l'analyse de l'incidence des bénéfices (AIB) du F-MCH. Des données ont été obtenues auprès de 584 femmes en âge de procréer sélectionnées aléatoirement. Les données sur leur niveau d'utilisation des services F-MCH et leurs dépenses directes de la poche (DDP) pour divers services F-MCH qu'elles ont utilisé ont été obtenues. Les bénéfices du F-MCH ont été évalués en utilisant le coût unitaire de la prestation des services, tandis que le bénéfice net a été calculé en soustrayant les dépenses directes de la poche pour les services de la valeur des bénéfices. Les coûts ont été calculés en monnaie locale (Naira ₦) et convertis en dollars américains USD. Les bénéfices nets ont été ventilés par endroits urbain-rural et par statut socioéconomique (SSE). Les indices de concentration ont été calculés pour fournir le niveau d'iniquité du SSE dans l'AIB du F-MCH. RÉSULTATS: L'incidence des prestations brutes totales était de ₦ 2.681.000 (7.660 USD). Le bénéfice brut qui a été consommé par les habitants des villes était de ₦ 1.581.000 (4.517,1 USD), tandis que les habitants ruraux ont consommé une valeur de bénéfices bruts de ₦ 1,1 million (3,608.20 USD). Cependant, les DDP pour le soi-disant F-MCH étaient de 6.527.580 ₦ (18.650,2 USD) dans la zone urbaine, alors qu'elles étaient de 3 194 706 ₦ (9.127,7 USD) parmi les habitants des zones rurales. Il y avait une incidence négative des bénéfices pour le F-MCH parce que les DDP dépassaient les bénéfices bruts au point d'utilisation des services. Il n'y avait pas de différence statistiquement significative dans l'incidence des bénéfices et les DDP entre les habitants des zones urbaines et rurales et entre les groupes socioéconomiques. CONCLUSION: La répartition des bénéfices bruts du programme F-MCH indique qu'il n'a peut-être pas atteint l'objectif souhaité d'un accès amélioré, en particulier pour la population à faible revenu. Fondamentalement, le niveau élevé de dépenses directes de la poche a effacé tout gain sociétal que le F-MCH avait été développé pour fournir. Par conséquent, il est nécessaire de revoir sa mise en œuvre et de revoir sa stratégie pour réduire les DDP et obtenir un meilleur accès pour une efficacité accrue du programme.

A 2-year review of publicly funded cell-free DNA screening in Ontario: utilization and adherence to funding criteria.

OBJECTIVE: Ontario offers a publicly funded modified contingent model of prenatal screening for aneuploidy in which cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening is covered for pregnancies at higher risk of fetal aneuploidy. The objective of this study was to review utilization of provincially funded cfDNA screening and adherence to the criteria laid out in Ontario prenatal screening guidelines. METHODS: This was a descriptive cohort study using data collected by Ontario's prescribed maternal and child registry. The study population included all pregnant individuals who received cfDNA screening from January 2016 to December 2017. RESULTS: The most common criteria for provincially funded cfDNA screening were advanced maternal age ≥40 years (37.7%), positive multiple marker screen (34.1%), modifying risk factors such as ultrasound soft markers (7.1%), and previous aneuploidy (5.5%). The audit demonstrated that 2.9% of funded cfDNA screens tests did not meet funding criteria, and that 11.4% of self-paid cfDNA screens could have been publicly funded. CONCLUSION: Reviewing and auditing the application of criteria for funded cfDNA screening using prescribed registry data allows an opportunity to identify areas where targeted education may improve adherence to standardized screening protocols, and provides a basis for reassessment of the funding model.

Sustaining Programs: Lessons Learned from Former Federal Grantees.

INTRODUCTION: A common concern of federal funders and grant recipients is how to sustain program activities once their federal funding period ends. Federal funding can be intended to develop or seed a program but not necessarily to continue its activities indefinitely. Understanding the importance of programmatic sustainability, the Office of Population Affairs (OPA) conducted research in 2015 on the elements that contribute to sustainability. As part of the Sustainability Study, OPA collected information from former Pregnancy Assistance Fund (PAF) program grantees. METHODS: Grantees that were awarded cohort 1 PAF program funding (2010-2014) but not awarded cohort 2 funding (2014-2017) were eligible for study inclusion because their OPA funding ended more than 1 year prior to the Sustainability Study, allowing for an assessment of sustainability after federal funding. Seven former PAF grantees were identified as eligible. Interviews were conducted with six of these grantees; grant applications and interim final reports from all seven were reviewed. RESULTS: Five lessons emerged from interviews and review of grant documentation. Programs successfully continuing beyond the federal grant period tended to (1) diversify funding sources, (2) communicate regularly with key stakeholders, (3) form partnerships with like-minded programs, (4) consider implementing evidence-based interventions, and (5) begin planning for sustainability early. DISCUSSION: By considering these lessons learned from the research, grantees can be well positioned to continue beyond a federal grant period. The lessons garnered from the Sustainability Study have informed, expanded, and affirmed OPA's sustainability toolkit, sustainability framework, and technical assistance.

Creation of an institutional semi-independent data monitoring committee.

BACKGROUND: A major goal of the National Institutes of Health's Clinical and Translational Science Award program is to facilitate clinical research and enhance the transition of basic to clinical research. As such, a number of Clinical and Translational Science Award centers have developed services to facilitate the conduct of clinical research, including support with fulfilling regulatory requirements. METHODS: The University of Kentucky sought to establish an institutional semi-independent monitoring committee to provide oversight for clinical research studies per National Institutes of Health requirements and recommendations. Our semi-independent monitoring committee was initiated in 2010. RESULTS: Since the inception of our semi-independent monitoring committee we have restructured its operations and protocols to improve efficiency. This article discusses our experiences with semi-independent monitoring committee creation and growth. CONCLUSION: This article summarizes our experience in creating and maturing an institutional data monitoring committee.

Prior publication productivity, grant percentile ranking, and topic-normalized citation impact of NHLBI cardiovascular R01 grants.

RATIONALE: We previously demonstrated absence of association between peer-review-derived percentile ranking and raw citation impact in a large cohort of National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute cardiovascular R01 grants, but we did not consider pregrant investigator publication productivity. We also did not normalize citation counts for scientific field, type of article, and year of publication. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether measures of investigator prior productivity predict a grant's subsequent scientific impact as measured by normalized citation metrics. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 1492 investigator-initiated de novo National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute R01 grant applications funded between 2001 and 2008 and linked the publications from these grants to their InCites (Thompson Reuters) citation record. InCites provides a normalized citation count for each publication stratifying by year of publication, type of publication, and field of science. The coprimary end points for this analysis were the normalized citation impact per million dollars allocated and the number of publications per grant that has normalized citation rate in the top decile per million dollars allocated (top 10% articles). Prior productivity measures included the number of National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-supported publications each principal investigator published in the 5 years before grant review and the corresponding prior normalized citation impact score. After accounting for potential confounders, there was no association between peer-review percentile ranking and bibliometric end points (all adjusted P>0.5). However, prior productivity was predictive (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Even after normalizing citation counts, we confirmed a lack of association between peer-review grant percentile ranking and grant citation impact. However, prior investigator publication productivity was predictive of grant-specific citation impact.

New cooperative medical scheme decreased financial burden but expanded the gap of income-related inequity: evidence from three provinces in rural China.

BACKGROUND: Subsidizing healthcare costs through insurance schemes is crucial to overcome financial barriers to health care and to avoid high medical expenditures for patients in China. The health insurance could decrease financial risk by less out-of-pocket (OOP) payment, but not promise the protection equity. With the growth of New Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) financing and coverage since 2008, the protection effectiveness and equity of the modified NCMS policies on financial burden should be further evaluated. METHODS: A cross-sectional household survey was conducted in Zhejiang, Hubei, and Chongqing provinces by multi-stage stratified random sampling in 2011. A total of 1,525 households covered by the NCMS were analyzed. The protection effectiveness and protection equity of NCMS was analyzed by comparing the changes in health care utilization and medical expenditures, and the changes in the prevalence of catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) and its concentration indices (CIs) between pre- and post-NCMS reimbursement, respectively. RESULTS: The medical financial burden was still remarkably high for the low income rural residents in China due to high OOP payment, even after NCMS reimbursement. In Hubei province, the OOP payment of the poorest quintile was almost same as their households' annual expenditures. Even it was higher than their annual expenditures in Chongqing municipality. Effective reimbursement ratio of both outpatient and inpatient services were far lower than nominal reimbursement ratio originally designed by NCMS plans. After NCMS reimbursement, the prevalence of CHE was considerably high in all three provinces, and the absolute values of CIs were even higher than those before reimbursement, indicating the inequity exaggerated. CONCLUSION: Policymakers should further modify NCMS policy in rural China. The high OOP payment could be decreased by expanding the drug list and check directory for benefit package of NCMS to minimize the gap between nominal reimbursement ratio and effective reimbursement ratio. And the increase in medical expenditures should be controlled by monitoring excess demand from both medical service providers and patients, and changing fee-for-service payment for providers to a prospective payment system. Service accessibility and affordability for vulnerable rural residents should be protected by modifying regressive financing in NCMS, and by providing extra financial aid and reimbursement from government.

Rehabilitation - a new approach. Part four: a new paradigm, and its implications.

This editorial proposes changes in healthcare services that should greatly improve the health status of all patients with disability. The main premises are that: rehabilitation usually involves many actions delivered by many people from different organisations over a prolonged period; specific rehabilitation actions cover a wide range of professional activities, with face to face therapy only being one; and the primary patient activity that improves function is practice of personally relevant activities in a safe environment. This editorial argues that: rehabilitation should occur at all times and in all settings, in parallel with medical care in order to maximise recovery and to avoid loss of fitness, skills and confidence associated with rest and being cared for; hospitals and other healthcare settings should adapt the environment to encourage practice of activities at all times; and that measuring rehabilitation, whether in research or for re-imbursement, should not simply consider face-to-face 'therapy time' but must include: all the other important activities undertaken by the team; 'structures' such as the appropriateness of the environment; and a process measure of the time spent by patients undertaking activities.

Obligations of low income countries in ensuring equity in global health financing.

BACKGROUND: Despite common recognition of joint responsibility for global health by all countries particularly to ensure justice in global health, current discussions of countries' obligations for global health largely ignore obligations of developing countries. This is especially the case with regards to obligations relating to health financing. Bearing in mind that it is not possible to achieve justice in global health without achieving equity in health financing at both domestic and global levels, our aim is to show how fulfilling the obligation we propose will make it easy to achieve equity in health financing at both domestic and international levels. DISCUSSION: Achieving equity in global health financing is a crucial step towards achieving justice in global health. Our general view is that current discussions on global health equity largely ignore obligations of Low Income Country (LIC) governments and we recommend that these obligations should be mainstreamed in current discussions. While we recognise that various obligations need to be fulfilled in order to ultimately achieve justice in global health, for lack of space we prioritise obligations for health financing. Basing on the evidence that in most LICs health is not given priority in annual budget allocations, we propose that LIC governments should bear an obligation to allocate a certain minimum percent of their annual domestic budget resources to health, while they await external resources to supplement domestic ones. We recommend and demonstrate a mechanism for coordinating this obligation so that if the resulting obligations are fulfilled by both LIC and HIC governments it will be easy to achieve equity in global health financing. Although achieving justice in global health will depend on fulfillment of different categories of obligations, ensuring inter- and intra-country equity in health financing is pivotal. This can be achieved by requiring all LIC governments to allocate a certain optimal per cent of their domestic budget resources to health while they await external resources to top up in order to cover the whole cost of the minimum health opportunities for LIC citizens.

Health spending and political influence: the case of earmarks and health care facilities.

Earmarks, otherwise known as Congressionally directed spending requests, are a historically significant means of political influence over budgets. In this brief, we report on the results of a longitudinal study of federal earmarks affecting health care facilities and public health. We analyzed 10 years of earmark for health care facilities and examined the correlates of being in the top 50% of earmark recipients for each year. Having representatives or senators serving on the respective Appropriations committees were shown to have increased odds of being a top earmark recipient, as was being in jurisdictions with greater poverty. However, health-related measures of need were not significantly associated with being a top earmark recipient.

[Resource use and financing of guideline-adherent psychotherapeutic inpatient care]. / Aufwand und Finanzierung leitliniengerechter, psychotherapeutischer Behandlung im Krankenhaus.

BACKGROUND: The financing of psychiatric psychotherapeutic care in Germany is determined by the German psychiatric staffing regulations which are unchanged since 1991. Psychotherapy was established after 1991 as an effective and indispensable treatment of mental and behavioral disorders. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to empirically investigate the use of psychiatrists' and psychologists' working time for psychotherapy in guideline-adherent hospital care. A further aim was to compare these results to the resources defined by the German psychiatric staffing regulations and in the new prospective payment system for psychiatry and psychosomatics in Germany. MATERIAL AND METHODS: University hospitals for psychiatry and psychotherapy were asked to retrospectively provide data of patients for which guideline-adherent care was possible. Participating institutions provided both data describing the staff time utilization of psychotherapeutic services provided by psychiatrists and psychologists and patient classifications according to the German psychiatric staffing regulations and the new prospective payment system for psychiatry and psychosomatics. RESULTS: Resources defined by the German psychiatric staffing regulations covered a mean of only 71 min of psychotherapy per patient and week while the actual mean intensity of psychotherapeutic care provided by the participating hospitals was 194 min per patient and week. The associated use of staff time was 102 min per patient and week. Both figures increased during an inpatient episode. The resources defined by the German psychiatric staffing regulations covered only 70 % of medical and psychological personnel. The current configuration of the new prospective payment system for psychiatry and psychosomatics covered only 59 % of staff time. CONCLUSION: The results of this study provide another unambiguous recommendation to adjust the out-dated German psychiatric staffing regulations to the current evidence and S3 guidelines for psychiatric psychotherapeutic hospital care. In particular, more resources are required for the provision of psychotherapeutic care.

Can price controls reduce pharmaceutical expenses? A case study of antibacterial expenditures in 12 Chinese hospitals from 1996 to 2005.

The objective of this article is to investigate whether the Chinese government's pricing policies have reduced pharmaceutical expenses. The purchasing records for systemic antibacterial drugs of 12 hospitals in Beijing from 1996 to 2005 were analyzed by separating the expenditure growth into three components: the price change, the volume change, and the structure change. Our results reveal that the structure change is the dominant determinant of drug expenditure growth. Despite lowered prices, the antibacterial drug expenditure was raised because more expensive drugs in the same therapeutic category were prescribed. It is insufficient to rely only on pricing policies to reduce drug expenses, given that physicians could circumvent the policy by prescribing more expensive drugs. In addition, physician behaviors need to be regulated to eliminate unnecessary overprescribing.

Public health and primary care: competition or collaboration?

In this commentary, the authors summarize and discuss some of the concerns presented in the papers herein, including issues of funding, skill sets and education. They present two key steps we could take across this country to ensure the long-term viability of public health within our healthcare system and ensure that public health and population goals are shared widely across our health systems.

Is public health ready to participate in the transformation of the healthcare system?

The healthcare system in Canada is undergoing significant transformation in response to three major interrelated pressures: the overall burden of illness is rising, patients are getting poor quality of care and healthcare costs are inexorably rising. One idea to guide this change is to transform the primary care system into a community-based primary healthcare (CBPH) system. This paper discusses, in particular, the readiness of public health to participate in the transformation to a CBPH system.

Person-centeredness in home- and community-based long-term care: current challenges and new directions.

Person-centered care (PCC) has demonstrated to be a viable and preferred model of providing health and institutionalized long-term care services. However, the concept of PCC has not been fully extended to home- and community-based long-term care services (HCBS) for older adults with chronic conditions. This review highlights the need for PCC in HCBS and suggests that social workers may play a role in overcoming cultural and structural barriers to extending PCC to HCBS that include: the fragmentation of the industry, financial structures, regulation of services, and paternalism in policy and practice. Recommendations for practice, policy, and research are provided.