Application of Kirschner wire placement guided technology in paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures.

BACKGROUND: To analyze the clinical efficacy of K-wire placement guided technology in paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in 105 patients who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning surgeries in our hospital from June 2019 to August 2022. 54 patients treated with a assisted reduction fixation device to assist in closed reduction and percutaneous K-wire cross-fixation were allocated into the Non-guided group, and 51 patients with K-wire placement guided technology to guide K-wire placement were assigned into the Guided group. The operation duration, number of disposable K-wire placement, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, Baumann angle, carrying angle, fracture healing time and Flynn score of elbow joint function at the final follow-up were compared between two groups. The postoperative complications of two groups were recorded. RESULTS: There were significant differences between two groups in terms of operation duration, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, and disposable K-wire placement rate (p < 0. 05), while no significant differences of Baumann angle, carrying angle and the fracture healing time between two groups were observed (p > 0. 05). In the control group, ulnar nerve injury in 2 case, pin site infection in 4 cases, mild cubitus varus in 2 cases and loss of reduction in 4 cases were detected. In the study group, ulnar nerve injury in 1 case, pin site infection in 2 cases and loss of reduction in 1 case was observed. There was no significant difference in Flynn scores between two groups. CONCLUSION: K-wire placement guided technology is simple and convenient. The application of K-wire placement guided technology could relatively improved disposable K-wire placement rate, shorten the intraoperative fluoroscopy frequencies and reduce complication rates.

Risk factors of poor mid-term shoulder functional outcomes of osteosynthesis using antegrade intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures: a retrospective study with a minimum 5-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Osteosynthesis using antegrade intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures yields satisfactory bone union rates; however, it may adversely affect postoperative shoulder function. To date, factors affecting mid- or long-term shoulder functional outcomes following intramedullary nail fixation have not been clarified. In this study, we aimed to identify the risk factors for poor mid-term functional outcomes over 5 years postoperatively following antegrade intramedullary nail osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 33 patients who underwent surgery using an antegrade intramedullary nail for acute traumatic humeral shaft fractures and were followed up for at least 5 years postoperatively. We divided the patients into clinical failure and no clinical failure groups using an age- and sex-adjusted Constant score of 55 at the final follow-up as the cutoff value. We compared preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative factors between the two groups. RESULTS: Five of the 33 patients had poor shoulder functional outcomes (adjusted Constant score < 55) at a mean follow-up of 7.5 years postoperatively. Proximal protrusion of the nail at the time of bone union (P = 0.004) and older age (P = 0.009) were significantly associated with clinical failure in the univariate analyses. Multivariate analysis showed that proximal protrusion of the nail (P = 0.031) was a risk factor for poor outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study provide new information on predictive factors affecting mid-term outcomes following osteosynthesis using antegrade nails. Our results demonstrated that proximal protrusion of the nail was significantly associated with poor mid-term functional shoulder outcomes. Therefore, particularly in older adults, it is essential to place the proximal end of the intramedullary nail below the level of the articular cartilage.

Comparative efficacy and safety of medical treatments for proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Various surgical techniques and conservative therapies are useful tools for treating proximal humerus fractures (PHFs), but it is important to understand how to properly utilize them. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare and rank the efficacy and safety of medical treatments for PHF. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the ClinicalTrials.gov databases were systematically searched for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception until June 2022. Conservative therapy-controlled or head-to-head RCTs of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), intramedullary nailing (IMN), hemiarthroplasty (HA), and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) used for the treatment of adult patients with PHF were included. The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities were applied to compare and rank the effects of medical treatments for PHF. RESULTS: Eighteen RCTs involving 1,182 patients with PHF were selected for the final analysis. Mostly baseline characteristics among groups were well balanced, and the imbalanced factors only included age, injury type, medial comminution, blood loss, and cognitive function in single trial. The SUCRA probabilities found that RTSA provided the best effect on the Constant-Murley score (SUCRA: 100.0%), and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score (SUCRA: 99.0%). Moreover, HA (SUCRA: 85.5%) and RTSA (SUCRA: 68.0%) had a relatively better effect on health-related quality of life than the other treatment modalities. Furthermore, conservative therapy (SUCRA: 84.3%) and RTSA (SUCRA: 80.7%) were associated with a lower risk of secondary surgery. Finally, the best effects on the risk of complications are varied, including infection was observed with conservative therapy (SUCRA: 94.2%); avascular necrosis was observed in HA (SUCRA: 78.1%), nonunion was observed in RTSA (SUCRA: 69.6%), and osteoarthritis was observed in HA (SUCRA: 93.9%). CONCLUSIONS: This study found that RTSA was associated with better functional outcomes, while the comparative outcomes of secondary surgery and complications varied. Optimal treatment for PHF should consider patient-specific factors.

Development of the humeral head offset index for control of humeral torsion.

BACKGROUND: Control of humeral torsion can present a challenge, especially intraoperatively during closed reduction and fixation of humeral shaft fractures or 2-part surgical neck fractures of the proximal humerus. The objective of this study is to develop and validate an indirect method for the assessment of humeral torsion using an index that is linearly correlated with rotational arm position and can be derived from only a single plain radiographic image of the proximal humerus. METHODS: The Humeral Head Offset Index (HHOI) is calculated as the ratio of the medial and lateral offset of the humeral head measured from the outer cortices of the shaft on a plain radiographic or fluoroscopic image. The relationship of HHOI with humeral torsion was first verified on a sawbone model with radiopaque characteristics under fluoroscopic control. Different degrees of retroversion were simulated through manual rotation of the humerus with a digital protractor in 5° increments until 40° internally rotated and then in 5° increments until 40° externally rotated from the neutral position. The same procedure was subsequently performed digitally on Digitally Reconstructed Radiographs (DRRs) from computed tomography (CT) dataset of the sawbone. Next, the HHOI index was applied to eight randomly selected patients with total humerus CT using the same method. Spearman's rho was calculated for the bivariate analysis of correlation between the simulated degree of retroversion and the HHOI. Strength of correlation was classified according to Koo and Li. Interrater and intrarater reliability of three blinded observers with repetition of measurement after three months were analyzed by assessing the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Both in the sawbone model and in DRRs, we demonstrated a high to very high significant linear correlation between simulated retroversion and the HHOI. ICC values demonstrated excellent interrater reliability and excellent intrarater reliability for measurement of the HHOI. CONCLUSIONS: The HHOI is a new, simple, reliable index that has a linear relationship to the rotation of the humerus and can therefore allow an indirect control of humeral torsion in comparison to the contralateral side.

A clinical study on robot navigationassisted intramedullary nail treatment for humeral shaft fractures.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the advantages of robot navigation system-assisted intramedullary nail treatment for humeral shaft fractures and compare it's efficacy with that of traditional surgical intramedullary nail treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients with humeral shaft fractures who received intramedullary nail treatment at our centre from March 2020 to September 2022. The analysis was divided into a robot group and a traditional surgical group on the basis of whether the surgery involved a robot navigation system. We compared the baseline data (age, sex, cause of injury, fracture AO classification, and time of injury-induced surgery), intraoperative conditions (surgery time, length of main nail insertion incision, postoperative fluoroscopy frequency, intraoperative bleeding), fracture healing time, and shoulder joint function at 1 year postsurgery (ASES score and Constant-Murley score) between the two groups of patients. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the baseline data or average fracture healing time between the two groups of patients. However, the robotic group had significantly shorter surgical times, longer main nail incisions, fewer intraoperative fluoroscopies, and less intraoperative blood loss than did the traditional surgery group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Robot navigation system-assisted intramedullary nail fixation for humeral shaft fractures is a reasonable and effective surgical plan. It can help surgeons determine the insertion point and proximal opening direction faster and more easily, shorten the surgical time, reduce bleeding, avoid more intraoperative fluoroscopy, and enable patients to achieve better shoulder functional outcomes.

Minimum four-year clinical outcomes after on-table reconstruction technique for Dubberley type III in coronal shear fractures of the capitellum and trochlea: a report of 10 patients.

PURPOSE: Comminuted coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus represent rare injuries and are difficult to treat, especially comminuted capitellum and trochlear fractures (Dubberley Type III). The on-table reconstruction technique of comminuted articular fractures may be an option, although it has not been reported in the coronal shear fracture of the distal humerus. The aim of the present case series is to determine the functional and radiological outcomes of on-table reconstructed Dubberley III fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 10 patients with Dubberley type III fractures in coronal shear fractures of the capitellum and trochlea who underwent an 'on-table' reconstruction technique between January 2009 and October 2019. All patients were evaluated using the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons(ASES) score, Mayo Elbow Score Performance Index (MEPI) score and at least 4 years later. RESULTS: All cases achieved union. At the final follow-up, the mean range of elbow motion was 11.5°of flexion contracture and 131.9° of further flexion. The mean DASH score was 21.2 (5.7) points (range 13.3-32.5). The mean ASES score was 88.6 ± 7.4 (range, 77 to 100). The mean MEPI score was 87 (10) points (range 70-100). In complication, partial osteonecrosis of capitellum is developed in one patient. One patient had heterotopic ossification without functional impairment. CONCLUSION: The on-table reconstruction technique can be a reliable option in the surgical treatment of complex distal humerus fractures. This technique allows anatomical reduction of comminuted capitellum and trochlea, with a low risk of avascular necrosis over 4 years of follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Complications and morbidity of the extended delto-pectoral approach in treating complex humeral shaft fractures with proximal metaphyseal extension using a long locking plate for internal fixation.

BACKGROUND: Humeral shaft fractures account for up to 3% of all fractures, but complex forms of those fractures (type AO/OTA B or higher) are rare. Plate and screw fixation of the fracture are rated as consolidated from 80 to 97%. Reported complications include non-union, secondary radial nerve palsy and infection. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) should provide the same union rate as open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) but potentially with fewer complications. The aim of our study was to review patients treated for complex humeral fractures with ORIF through an extended delto-pectoral approach using a long pre-contoured locking plate. The morbidity of the open approach, complication rates, union rate and clinical outcomes were assessed. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 26 consecutive complex humeral shaft fractures (7 males, mean age 59 years; 19 females, mean age 67 years) treated in our institution with a long pre-contoured locking plate between June/2011 and December/2017. Fracture healing was evaluated with standard radiographs. Eventual complications and the morbidity of the approach were assessed through chart review. The final clinical outcome and quality of life were assessed via telephone interview with DASH score and EQ-5D-3 L in 25 of the 26 patients included. RESULTS: There were no complications related to the open approach with uneventful wound healing in all cases without any infections. Mechanical complications occurred in 3 cases (11%): one tuberosity dislocation (revised) and two plate failures (one revised). Postoperative radial nerve palsy was observed in two patients (7%), of which one was transient, the other was persistent. The plate was removed in 4 cases (15%). The average radiological and clinical follow-up was 21 months (range: 12-56). At 12 months follow-up complete fracture healing was confirmed in 22 out of 26 cases and in three more patients after 18 months. After an average of 44 months, the mean DASH score was 35 (SD ± 15.83) points; the EQ-5D-3 L score 0.7 (SD ± 0.31). CONCLUSION: ORIF with a long locking plate though an extended delto-pectoral approach is certainly still a viable option to treat complex humeral shaft fractures with good soft tissue and bone healing as well as good functional recovery. No increased morbidity was attributed to the open surgical approach. In our series, radial nerve palsy could not be completely avoided, accentuating the potential risk of this specific fracture in close proximity to the radial nerve. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Ethics Committee: Ethikkommission Ostschweiz (EKOS), Project ID: 2019-00323.

Supracondylar Humerus Fractures: When Lateral Entry Pins Are Not Enough.

Percutaneous pin configuration for the management of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures has been studied extensively both in the biomechanics laboratory and in the clinical setting. Medial entry pins (ie, crossed pinning) increase supracondylar humerus fracture construct stability under certain loading conditions. However, there are noted drawbacks of medial entry pinning, specifically the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. In most circumstances, the additional biomechanical stability of crossed pinning is unlikely to be clinically necessary for maintenance of fracture alignment, but there are scenarios in which medial entry pins should be strongly considered. It is important to review the biomechanics of various pin configurations in the setting of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures, discuss the indications for medial entry pinning (crossed pinning), and discuss a safe technique for applying medial entry pins when indicated.

Update on Pediatric Medial Epicondyle Fractures.

The ideal evaluation and treatment of pediatric patients with medial epicondyle fractures remain controversial. It is important to examine the most recent literature and provide an update on the current clinical practices, imaging modalities, treatment techniques, outcomes, and complications associated with displaced pediatric medial epicondyle fractures. There remains substantial variability across recommended treatment options and the outcomes between surgical versus nonsurgical management of these injuries. Despite the lack of consensus regarding management of pediatric medial epicondyle fractures, both nonsurgical and surgical approaches have demonstrated equivocal results.

Proximal Humerus Fractures: How to Achieve Best Outcomes.

The treatment of proximal humerus fractures remains controversial. Although treatment modalities may vary, the goal of obtaining the best outcomes for patients remains the same. Most proximal humerus fractures can be treated nonsurgically but should still be managed actively. Deciding on surgical management requires a good understanding of indications and options. Indications for open reduction and internal fixation include younger or active patients with displaced two-, three-, and four-part fractures as well as fracture-dislocations with head-split patterns. Obtaining ideal outcomes requires anatomic reduction with restoration of the medial calcar as well as optimal position of implants to favor biomechanical stability. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is indicated for patients with severe and displaced fractures in older or low-demand patients. Obtaining the best functional outcomes depends on implant position, tuberosity healing, and early surgical intervention. Regardless of the treatment modality, these fractures can be challenging, and proper patient rehabilitation must be implemented. Future research will focus on patient selection and improving surgical techniques to maximize outcomes.

Transphyseal Fracture of the Distal Humerus.

Transphyseal fractures of the distal humerus often occur in children younger than 4 years as a result of birth trauma, nonaccidental trauma, or falls from a low height. It is important to identify and treat these injuries in a timely manner to ensure successful management. Most transphyseal fractures of the distal humerus are treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning with the aid of an elbow arthrogram. The most common complication following a fracture is cubitus varus caused by growth arrest, malunion, or osteonecrosis of the medial condyle. Normal carrying angles may be restored through corrective lateral closing wedge osteotomy.

Radial Nerve Palsy in the Setting of Humeral Shaft Fracture.

The upper limb has a complex anatomy comprised of many nerve and vascular structures, making humeral shaft fractures extremely important. Injury to the humeral shaft commonly occurs due to trauma and affects younger male or older female patients. The radial nerve travels along the spiral groove of the humerus, placing it at an increased risk of damage in humeral shaft fractures. If injured, there are a variety of classifications of radial nerve injury, different indications for exploration, and treatment methods that orthopedic surgeons have available in treating these injuries. This review aims to discuss the etiology of humeral shaft fracture-associated radial nerve palsy, tools for diagnosis, and treatment.

The comparison of functional bracing of humeral shaft fractures: thermoplastic custom against preprepared commercial braces.

BACKGROUND: Functional humeral bracing of midshaft humeral fractures has been widely accepted as a gold standard for nonoperative treatment. Despite reported high union rates, there is no proven superiority of any orthosis. Here we aim to compare the outcomes after the use of custom-made thermoplastic vs. commercial humeral brace with regard to time to union, nonunion rates, types of nonunion, and conversion to surgery. METHODS: Patients with humeral fractures treated between 2018 and 2021 were identified retrospectively by electronic records. Only diaphyseal humerus fractures (AO 12) were included in the study. Proximal (AO 11) or distal (AO 13) fractures, open fractures, pathologic fractures, bilateral fractures, multiple fractures, and patients lost to follow-up were excluded. Patients attending one center received a custom-made thermoplastic splint, whereas those at the other center had an off-the-shelf humeral brace applied. Radiologic union was defined as healing of at least 3 of 4 cortices determined from follow-up radiographs. Data calculations were performed using the χ2 test. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients treated with a thermoplastic brace and 43 with a commercial brace were identified. A total of 52 men were included, and the cohort's mean age was 60.1 years (standard deviation: 16.1 years). Both groups had similar gender and age distributions. More patients achieved union with a thermoplastic brace (79.2%) than those with a commercial brace (76.7%), which was statistically significant (χ2, P = .04). Although time to union was similar both clinically and radiologically, patients with a commercial brace converted to surgical treatment more frequently (11 vs. 14 cases). CONCLUSION: Thermoplastic custom-made braces provide better fracture stability, allowing for statistically significantly higher rates of fracture union during a similar treatment period to commercially available splints. Patients wearing a commercial splint were significantly more likely to develop hypertrophic nonunion requiring surgery.

A novel configuration for the fixation of intra-articular C2.3 distal humerus fractures with the potential for minimally invasive surgery: a biomechanical evaluation and finite element analysis.

BACKGROUND: Distal humerus fractures are a challenge to treat, and the current standard of care, open reduction internal fixation with a double-plate, has a high rate of complications. We proposed a novel internal fixation configuration, lateral intramedullary nail and medial plate (LINMP) and verified its rigidity through biomechanical tests and finite element analysis. METHODS: The study involved biomechanical testing of 30 synthetic humerus models to compare 2 different fixation systems for an AO 13C-2.3 type fracture. The orthogonal double-plate (ODP) group and the LINMP group were compared through biomechanical testing to measure stiffness and failure load fewer than 3 working conditions. Based on the results, we optimized the intramedullary nail by eliminating the holes at the distal end of the nail and incorporating a 2-hole external locking plate. The Finite element analysis was also conducted to further compare the modified LINMP configuration with the previous 2 fixation configurations. RESULTS: In biomechanical tests, the ODP group exhibited lower stiffness under bending and compression forces compared to the LINMP group, but higher stiffness and failure loads under torsion force. In finite element analysis, the modified LINMP reduces the maximum stress of the fixation structure without significantly reducing the stiffness under bending stress and axial compression conditions. In torsion stress conditions, the modified LINMP enhances both the maximum stress and the stiffness, although it remains marginally inferior to the ODP structure. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that the innovative LINMP presents comparable or slightly superior concerning bending and axial loading compared to orthogonal double-plate osteosynthesis for distal humeral intra-articular fractures, which might become a minimally invasive option for these fractures.

Risk factors for nonunion in patients with transcondylar fracture of the distal humerus after open reduction and internal fixation.

BACKGROUND: Transcondylar fractures have been reported to rarely occur in the distal humerus, and stable fixation is difficult because of the unique fracture pattern. However, few studies have reported the risk factors for nonunion after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). This study aimed to evaluate the demographic and surgical risk factors for nonunion in patients who had undergone ORIF for transcondylar fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 68 patients who underwent ORIF for transcondylar fractures. Preoperative demographic factors, including diabetes mellitus (DM) and smoking, and operative factors, including fixation methods (eg, dual plate/single plate/tension band wiring [TBW]) were assessed as risk factors for nonunion. RESULTS: Nonunion occurred in 8 out of 68 patients (11.8%). Univariate analysis revealed that among the demographic factors, DM (4/8 [50%] vs. 8/60 [13.3%], P = .028) and smoking (3/8 [37.5%] vs. 4/60 [6.7%], P = .031) were significantly different between nonunion and union patients. Regarding operative factors, the fixation method (dual plate/single plate/TBW; 2 [25.0%]/2 [25.0%]/4 [50%] vs. 29 [48.3%]/25 [41.7%]/6 [10.0%], P = .033) showed significant differences between nonunion and union patients. Multivariate regression analysis showed that DM (odds ratio [OR], 10.560; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.308-85.247; P = .027), smoking (OR 22.371; 95% CI, 2.111-237.081; P = .010), and TBW (OR 15.390; 95% CI, 1.348-175.666; P = .028) were independent risk factors for nonunion. CONCLUSIONS: Nonunion occurred in approximately 12% of the patients who underwent ORIF in the transcondylar region of the distal humerus. The risk of nonunion was higher in patients with DM than those who smoked. In addition, among the fixation methods, the TBW technique was a significant risk factor for nonunion.

Intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures: percutaneous nailing in the lateral position through the Neviaser approach is a reliable technique.

BACKGROUND: Displaced humeral shaft fractures are frequently treated by osteosynthesis in the active patient. We aimed to evaluate the results of intramedullary nailing (IMN) in the lateral position with the Neviaser approach and to compare them with those from IMN nailing in the standard position and conventional approach. METHODS: In the retrospectively evaluated, single-center study, we compared 20 cases of long IMN for fractures of the proximal or middle third of the humerus shaft (Multilock; Synthes Laboratory) in the lateral position with the percutaneous Neviaser approach with 52 cases of IMN in the standard position. The mean age of patients was 62 ± 21 years. Clinical outcomes were analyzed: Constant score, subjective shoulder evaluation score and range of motion. Radiographically, entry point at the proximal part of the humerus, the healing rate and the possible association between the critical shoulder angle (CSA) and the correct positioning of the nail were assessed. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up of 26 ± 2 months, the healing rate was 89% (64/72) in the overall series, (eight patients in non-union), with no difference between the two groups. The overall mean active anterior elevation (AAE) was 125 ± 22°, mean external rotation (ER1) was 35 ± 17°, and mean internal rotation (IR) was at L3. The mean Constant score was 58 ± 23 and subjective shoulder evaluation score 73 ± 12%. ranges of motion were better in the lateral than standard position group (AAE 133 ± 17 vs. 122 ± 23, P = .03; ER1 47 ± 13 vs. 30 ± 16, P < .001; IR T12 vs. L5, P = .02). The nail was less often protruding in the lateral than standard position group (1/20 [5%] vs. 20/52 [38.5%], P = .002). The nail was better positioned from the anteroposterior view (nail centered: 16/20 [75%] vs. 26/52 [50%], P = .047) and lateral view (nail centered: 18/20 [90%] vs. 34/52 [65.4%], P = .02) in the lateral than standard position group. We found no association between nail position, type of approach and CSA. CONCLUSIONS: In the short-term follow-up, osteosynthesis of humeral shaft fractures by using long IMN in the lateral position with the Neviaser approach is a reliable technique. The positioning of the nail, in particular its entry point, and the clinical results were better with the lateral position and Neviaser approach than with the standard position and conventional approach. Further studies with a larger number of patients, assessment of the learning curve, and analysis of the impact of this technique on comorbidities (unchanged cerebral perfusion) are needed to fully validate this technique.

Geriatric proximal humerus fracture operative management: a Truven Health Analytics database study (2015-2020).

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to assess the trends in operative management of geriatric (≥65 years) proximal humerus fractures during a 6-year period (2015-2020) within an insurance claims database. METHODS: This retrospective database cohort study used data gathered from the 2015-2020 IBM Truven MarketScan Commercial and IBM Truven MarketScan Medicare Supplemental databases. The International Statistical Classification of Disease and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, data was correlated to the Current Procedural Terminology code for shoulder arthroplasty (proximal humeral prosthetic replacement: 23616, shoulder hemiarthroplasty [HA]: 23470, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty [rTSA]: 23472) or open reduction internal fixation (ORIF; open treatment of proximal humerus fracture with internal fixation: 23615, open treatment of proximal humerus fracture-dislocation with internal fixation: 23680). We investigated the number of proximal humerus fracture operative cases per year, percentage arthroplasty used per year, rTSA and HA per year, hospital cost information, as well as percentage arthroplasty per US geographic region. RESULTS: A total of 8057 operative proximal humerus fractures cases were identified in 7697 patients aged >65 years, with 0.45% (360 of 8057) being bilateral. There was a 40.8% decrease in the rate of operative management of proximal humerus fractures between the first half (2015-2017, 1687.3 ± 146.6) and the second half of the study period (2018-2020, 998.3 ± 258.7). Arthroplasty accounted for 78.7% of all surgeries, 91% of those being rTSA. The total number of cases of rTSA and ORIF performed decreased per year (P = .01). The downward trend of percentage ORIF per year approached significance (P = .054). Arthroplasty was a more expensive option of payment for total case by almost $850.00 (P = .001). There was a larger percentage of arthroplasty performed in the Northeast and North Central US geographic regions. CONCLUSION: Despite the rise of both the elderly population and related geriatric proximal humerus fractures, they were less operatively represented in this insurance claims database across the 6-year period. There may be a trend to use less ORIF when addressing these fractures. Although it incurred a higher in-hospital cost, arthroplasty was being performed at a higher percentage in the Northeast and North Central regions of the United States.

Trends in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures from 2010 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) is continuing to rise due to shifts towards a more aged population as well as advancements in surgical treatment options. The purpose of this study is to examine and compare trends in the treatment of PHFs (nonoperative vs. operative; different surgical treatments) across different age groups over the last decade (2010-2020). METHODS: The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database was queried using International Classification of Diseases and Current Procedural Terminology codes to identify all patients presenting with or undergoing surgery for PHF between 2010 and 2020. Treatment trends, demographics, and insurance information were analyzed during the study period. Comparisons were made between operative and nonoperative trends with respect to the number and type of surgeries performed among 3 age groups: ≤49 years, 50-64 years, and ≥65 years. The rate of postoperative complications and reoperations was evaluated and compared among different surgical treatments for patients with a minimum 1-year postoperative follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 92,308 patients with a mean age of 67.8 ± 16.8 years were included. Over the last decade, there was no significant increase in the percentage of PHFs treated with surgery. A total of 15,523 PHFs (16.82%) were treated operatively, and these patients, compared with the nonoperative cohort, were younger (64.9 years vs. 68.4 years, P < .001), more likely to be White (80.2% vs. 74.7%, P < .001), and more likely to have private insurance (41.4% vs. 32.0%, P < .001). For patients ≤49 years old, trends in operative treatment have remained stable with internal fixation (IF) as the most used surgical modality. For patients 50-64 years old, we observed a gradual decline in the use of hemiarthroplasty (HA), with a corresponding increase in the use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), but IF continued to be the most used operative modality. In patients over 65 years, a steep decline in the use of IF and HA was noted during the first half of the decade along with a significant exponential increase in the use of rTSA, which surpassed the use of IF in 2019. Despite the increase in the use of rTSA, no differences in rate of surgical complications were noted between rTSA and IF (χ2 = 0.245, P = .621) or reoperations (χ2 = 0.112, P = .730). CONCLUSION: Nonsurgical treatment remains the mainstay treatment of PHFs. Although there is no increase in the prevalence of operative treatment in patients ≥50 years in the last decade, there is an exponential increase in the use of rTSA with a corresponding decrease in HA and IF, a trend more substantial in patients ≥65 years compared with patients between 50 and 64 years.

Distal humeral hemiarthroplasty compared to total elbow replacement for distal humeral fractures: a registry analysis of 906 procedures.

BACKGROUND: Total elbow replacement (TER) is an accepted treatment for complex intra-articular distal humerus fractures in elderly patients. Distal humeral hemiarthroplasty (HA) is also a potential surgical option for unreconstructable fractures and avoids the concerns regarding mechanical wear and functional restrictions associated with TER. In the current literature, there are limited data available to compare the revision rates of HA and TER for the treatment of fracture. We used data from a large national arthroplasty registry to compare the outcome of HA and TER undertaken for fracture/dislocation and to assess the impact of demographics and implant choice on revision rates. METHODS: Data obtained from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry from May 2, 2005, to December 31, 2021, included all procedures for primary elbow replacement with primary diagnosis of fracture or dislocation. The analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship and hazard ratios (HRs) from Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: There were 293 primary HA and 631 primary TER procedures included. The cumulative percentage revision (CPR) rate at 9 years was 9.7% for HA (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.0, 15.7), and 11.9% (95% CI 8.5, 16.6) for TER. When adjusted for age and gender, there was a significantly higher risk of revision after 3 months for TER compared to HA (HR 2.47, 95% CI 1.22, 5.03, P = .012). There was no difference in the rate of revision for patients aged <55 years or ≥75 years when HA and TER procedures were compared. In primary TER procedures, loosening was the most common cause of revision (3.6% of primary TER procedures), and the most common type of revision in primary TER involved revision of the humeral component only (2.6% of TER procedures). TER has a higher rate of first revision for loosening compared to HA (HR 4.21, 95% CI 1.29, 13.73; P = .017). In HA procedures, instability (1.7%) was the most common cause for revision. The addition of an ulna component was the most common type of revision (2.4% of all HA procedures). CONCLUSION: For the treatment of distal humerus fractures, HA had a lower revision rate than TER after 3 months when adjusted for age and gender. Age <55 or ≥75 years was not a risk factor for revision when HA was compared to TER. Loosening leading to revision is more prevalent in TER and increases with time. In HA, the most common type of revision involved addition of an ulna component with preservation of the humeral component.

Surgical treatment of coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus with an intact lateral epicondyle by the lateral combined approach.

BACKGROUND: Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus are not only rare and prone to misdiagnosis, but their surgical treatment can be challenging. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of exposing distal humeral coronal shear fractures with a combined lateral approach that preserves the extensors and lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) and to analyze the clinical efficacy of open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of these injuries. METHODS: We included 45 patients who sustained coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus with the lateral epicondyle intact and were treated with open reduction and internal fixation from January 2013 to August 2020. The fractures were exposed by the lateral combined approach in which the tendons involving the common extensor, the extensor carpi ulnaris, and the LUCL were preserved. Two observation windows were formed anterior to and posterior to these tendons and the LUCL was used to achieve fracture reduction. Countersunk screws, with or without a plate placed on the posterior lateral condyle, were used to fix the fragments. The functional outcomes of these patients were reviewed and assessed with physical and radiographic examinations, range of motion measurements, and self-evaluation Mayo Elbow Performance Index and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores. RESULTS: In total, 40 patients were followed up with for over 1 year and were included in the final analysis. The mean follow-up duration was 42 ± 30 months (range, 12-107 months). The patients' mean age was 42 years (range, 14-74 years). According to the Dubberley Classification, there were 15 type I, 17 type II, and 8 type III fractures. At the final follow-up, the mean flexion-extension arc was 131° (range, 65-150) and mean pronation and supination was 73° (range, 45-80) and 71° (range, 40-80), respectively. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Index score was 88 (range, 61-97) points; the results were excellent in 21, good in 13, fair in 4, and poor in 2 patients. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 11 (range, 0-42) points. Neither functional score nor range of movement was associated with age, sex, fracture type, injury type, or surgical timing. CONCLUSION: Reduction and stable fixation with internal fixation for coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus can be achieved by the lateral combined approach. Early functional mobilization allows for satisfactory restoration of elbow function.