Effects of audio and visual distraction on patients' vital signs and tolerance during esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) provides an indispensable and unambiguous inspection allowing the discovery upper gastrointestinal lesions. However, many patients are anxious about undergoing EGD. Few studies have investigated the influence on patients' vital signs and tolerance during EGD using subjective and objective assessments. This study was a prospective randomized controlled study that investigated the influence of audio and visual distraction on EGD. METHODS: We randomly divided 289 subjects who underwent EGD into 4 groups (control group, audio group, visual group, combination group) and examined their vital signs, heart rate variability (HRV), psychological items, and acceptance of distraction. RESULTS: Pulse rate (PR) at post-distraction and post-EGD in the 3 distraction groups were significantly lower than those of control group (p <  0.001 and p <  0.01, respectively). Blood pressure (BP) during and post-EGD was significantly higher than that at pre-EGD in control group (p <  0.05), but no significant elevation of BP was observed during the latter half of EGD and post-EGD in the 3 distraction groups. BP at post-distraction improved significantly compared to pre-distraction in the 3 distraction groups (p <  0.05). There was a significant difference in the low-frequency (LF) power/ high-frequency (HF) power at post-distraction and post-EGD among the 4 groups (p <  0.001 and p <  0.001, respectively). The LF power/HF power at post-distraction and post-EGD in the 3 distraction groups was significantly lower than that in control group (p <  0.05). Several items of profile of mood states (POMS) and the impression of EGD at post-distraction improved significantly compared to those at pre-distraction among the 3 distraction groups (p <  0.05). Visual analog scale (VAS) of willingness for the next use of distraction in the 3 distraction groups was excellent because VAS was more than 70. CONCLUSIONS: Distractions effectively improved psychological factors, vital signs and some of HRV at pre and post-EGD. Distractions may suppress BP elevation during the latter half of EGD and lead to stability of HRV on EGD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This prospective trial was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000029637. Registered on 20 October 2017.

Effect of Information of Patients' Coping Style on Pregastroscopy Anxiety.

Examination of the relationship between patients' coping style, pregastroscopy information, and anxiety associated with gastroscopy in China was the aim of this study. A pretest, post-test, nonrandom assignment study with a two by two design was conducted. One hundred forty-five patients who underwent initial gastroscopy without sedation were classified into 2 groups on the basis of the coping style: information seekers or information avoiders using the Information Subscale of the Krantz Health Opinion Survey (KHOS-I). All participants were given standardized procedural information about gastroscopy as routine care. Half of each group was assigned to receive additional sensory information describing what sensation they would experience and how to cooperate to alleviate the discomfort. State anxiety assessed by the State Anxiety Scale of Spielberg's State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, blood pressure, and pulse were measured at enrollment and before gastroscopy. The information seekers and avoiders who received additional sensory information experienced significantly less state anxiety after the intervention. In contrast, the information seekers and avoiders who received standardized procedural information maintained their preintervention state anxiety level. Most patients reported their preference for sensory information. In conclusion, the provision of sensory information could significantly reduce patients' pregastroscopy anxiety regardless of patients' information coping style.

Ultrathin unsedated transnasal gastroscopy in monitoring eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Ultrathin unsedated transnasal gastroscopy (UTEG) has a number of advantages applicable to eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and has not been evaluated for this condition. AIM: The aim of the study is to determine the feasibility of UTEG in patients with EoE and the acceptability of histological specimens obtained at biopsy. METHOD: All patients with a diagnosis of EoE presenting to the outpatients department of two hospitals (Box Hill Hospital and The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne Australia) were asked to participate in the study. UTEG was performed on consenting individuals. Feasibility was determined by the success of nasal intubaton, patient perception according to post procedural survey, and adequacy of esophageal biopsies was assessed. RESULTS: Ninety-six consecutive patients with EoE were offered UTEG, and 24 agreed to participate in the study. Seventy-four UTEGs were performed over a period of 26 months (September 2012 to December 2014). Nineteen patients had repeat procedures. Successful nasal intubation occurred in 97% (72 of 74 procedures), and 21 of 24 (86%) described high satisfaction with the procedure and minimal discomfort, and would choose UTEG for future procedures. Mean duration was 5 min. Adverse events of epistaxis (three cases) and vomiting of liquid contents during the procedure (two cases) were recorded, cardiorespiratory parameters remaining normal in all patients. All completed procedures produced adequate histological samples. CONCLUSION: In those who decide to undergo UTEG, it is a safe and well-tolerated procedure.

Patients' perspectives of living with a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG).

BACKGROUND: Since enteral nutrition therapy is the preferred nutritional support for dysphagic patients with a range of diagnoses, PEG has become part of traditional care. However, enteral nutrition with PEG transfers treatment responsibility and activity to the patients and their carers, so the advantages should be discussed. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate patients' experience of living with a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in order to increase the understanding of patients' need for support. METHOD: In a prospective study at Karolinska University Hospital in Sweden, data were collected consecutively at the time of PEG and two months later using a study-specific questionnaire about each patient's experience of living with a PEG. Fishers exact test was used to test for statistically significant difference at five per cent level. RESULTS: There were 104 responders (response rate of 70%). Women felt more limited in daily activity compared to men (p = 0.004). Older patients experienced a more limited ability to influence the number of feeding times compared to younger (p = 0.026). Highly educated patients found feeding more time-consuming (p = 0.004). Patients with a cancer diagnosis reported that the PEG feeding interfered with their oral feeding more than patients with a neurological disease (p = 0.009). Patients mostly contacted the PEG outpatient clinic with problems regarding their PEG, and were mainly assisted by their spouse rather than district nurses. CONCLUSIONS: PEG feeding is time-consuming and interferes with daily life. Although 73% was satisfied, patients' experiences of living with a PEG may be dependent on age, sex, education and diagnosis. Spouses are the main carers for PEG patients at home, and patients prefer to go to the PEG outpatient clinic for help if problems occur.

Usefulness of a fast track list for anxious patients in a upper GI endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: To determine whether patients with no alarm signs who ask the endoscopist to shorten their waiting time due to test result anxiety, represent a risk category for a major organic pathology. METHODS: At our open-access endoscopy service, we set up an expedite list for six months for outpatients who complained that the waiting time for gastroscopy was too long. Over this period we studied 373 gastroscopy patients. In addition to personal details, we collected information on the presence of Hp infection and compliance with dyspepsia guideline indications for gastroscopy. RESULTS: Average waiting time was 38.2 days (SD 12.7). The 66 patients who considered the waiting time too long underwent gastroscopy within 15 days. We made 5 diagnoses of esophageal and gastric tumour and gastric ulcer (7.6%) among the expedite list patients and 14 (4.6%) among those on the normal list (p=0.31). On including duodenal peptic disease in the analysis, the total prevalence rate rose to 19.7% in the short-wait group and to 10.4% (p=0.036) in the longer-wait group. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests that asking to be fast-tracked does not have prognostic impact on the diagnosis of a major (gastric ulcer and cancer) pathology.

Long-term percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding in young adults with multiple disabilities.

AIM: To study the outcomes from initiation of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding in young people with profound multiple disabilities. METHODS: Observations were made on 40 adults with lifelong intellectual disability (mental retardation) and quadriplegia, in whom PEG feeding was initiated during 1990-2008. There were 20 men and 20 women aged 15-40 years at the time of the audit, living in settings with 24 h registered nurse staffing. RESULTS: Undernutrition and recurrent aspiration with frequent infections were cited as reasons for PEG feeding. The positive outcomes were that some were said to be more alert for a time following the procedure; and these young adults lived with PEG feeding for an average of 8.5 years, some up to 18 years. In that time, however, they all experienced complications of the PEG insertion, and of the PEG feeding process. There were no measurable improvements in cognition. There were no reductions in prescription of medications. They all required frequent daily interventions by nurses to maintain medical stability. Ten people died during this review period, from continued deterioration in neurological status, with pneumonia cited as the terminal event. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike other people with neurological deterioration, young adults with lifelong multiple disabilities may live for many years with PEG feeding. There is little gain in quality of life.

The effectiveness of clinical hypnosis in the digestive endoscopy: a multiple case report.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and viability of hypnosis before and during a gastrointestinal endoscopy. Six Gastroscopies and 22 colonoscopies were carried out under hypnosis in a group of patients. The patients ranged in age from 20 and 67 years and have a history of previously incomplete and poorly tolerated examinations or expressed an active demand for sedation. For 6 of the patients who underwent a gastroscopy under hypnosis, the procedure was successfully completed, reaching the second part of the duodenum without difficulty for the endoscopist. Colonoscopy of the cecum was completed in 19 of 20 patients. All patients, except 1, considered their tolerance level as "good." Hypnosis facilitated an adequate endoscopy intervention without any discomfort in 85% of the cases examined. Avoidance of anaesthesia reduces risk to the patient. Hence, hypnosis for gastrointestinal endoscopy appears to provide a promising strategy.

Pre-endoscopic tachycardia predicts increased sedation dose and lower adenoma detection rate in patients undergoing endoscopic procedures: a case control study.

BACKGROUND: Tachycardia prior to endoscopic procedures is commonly encountered which reflect patient anxiety status. Despite this frequent occurrence, it is unclear if in a patient with tachycardia sedation dose should be modified. The aim of our study was to assess the effect of pre-endoscopic tachycardia on sedation dose. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent upper endoscopy and colonoscopy at EMMS Nazareth hospital were performed. We excluded patients with diseases and medications affecting the heart rate. RESULTS: A total of 2855 patients were included in the study. Two-hundred and thirty-seven patients had tachycardia before endoscopy (8.3%, group A) as compared to 2618 (group B) patients who had heart rate ≤100 beats per minute. The mean dosage of propofol in group A was significantly higher (62.6±33.2 mg vs. 57.4±29.9 mg) than in group B (P=0.01). There was no difference in the cecal intubation rate among the two groups (P=0.9). Notably, the adenoma detection rate was significantly lower among group A patients as compared to group B (13.6% vs. 22.8%, P=0.02) patients. There were no sedation related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Tachycardia prior to endoscopic procedures was associated with higher sedative dosage and lower adenoma detection rate, however no major complications were recorded. These data should be taken into consideration to optimize procedure quality.

Preparatory information reduces gastroscopy-related stress in children as confirmed by salivary cortisol.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aimed to determine whether the anxiety levels of pediatric patients who undergo endoscopy are reduced after receiving preparatory information about the endoscopic procedure by monitoring their salivary cortisol (s-cortisol) levels. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 184 children undergoing gastroscopy under sedoanalgesia were included in the study. All the patients received a brief explanation of the endoscopic procedure. Patients were divided into two groups; Group Unexplained did not receive any further information other than a brief explanation of the procedure, Group Explained received more detailed explanation of the procedure. To determine anxiety levels, saliva specimens were taken on the day before the procedure to examine cortisol levels before and after endoscopy. Anxiety scores before endoscopy were calculated by the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale. Patients were monitored throughout sedoanalgesia, including during the endoscopy, sedation and recovery, and total propofol dosages were recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-nine children undergoing gastroscopy (age 11.55 ± 2.52 years; 50.5% girls) constituted Group Explained and 95 children undergoing gastroscopy (age 11.44 ± 2.66 years; 56.8% male) constituted Group Unexplained. The anxiety score, duration of sedation, endoscopy and recovery, propofol dose, pre- and post-endoscopy s-cortisol levels were significantly reduced in Group Explained. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that when endoscopic procedure is explained broadly to a child, the procedural stress is significantly less, as measured by the s-cortisol levels and the anxiety questionnaire. It is important for the attending physician to explain all aspects of examination carefully.

The frequency of the psychiatric symptoms in the patients with dyspepsia at a university hospital.

OBJECTIVE: According to the psychiatric hypothesis, the symptoms of dyspepsia may be due to depression, anxiety or a somatization disorder. We investigated the frequency of psychiatric symptoms in patients undergoing endoscopic procedures with dyspepsia, either with or without pathological findings, and compared this with control subjects without dyspeptic symptoms. METHODS: Ninety patients with dyspeptic symptoms and 90 control subjects participated in the study. Both the patients and the controls were asked to complete a questionnaire about socio-demographic characteristics, the Turkish version of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the Symptom Check List-90 (SCL-90). In order for us to determine whether the criteria for any of the conditions listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) were met, the patients were asked to take part in the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV disorders. RESULTS: Of the participants, 47.8% had a psychiatric disorder according to DSM-IV criteria, somatoform disorder (44.2%) being the most common. While 42.2% patients were determined to have a pathological finding using endoscopic evaluation, 57.8% had no findings. Together with the somatization and obsessive-compulsive disorder subscale scores, the total SCL-90 score and the mean trait anxiety score were statistically significantly higher in participants with no pathological findings. There were trends for anxiety (13.2% vs. 7.7%) and mood (2.6% vs. 0.0%) disorders to be more frequent in patients with pathological findings, while somatoform disorder+depressive disorder (17.3% vs. 5.2%) was more frequent in patients with no findings, although the differences were not statistically significant (Z=0.7, P>.05). The scores of state-trait anxiety, somatization, obsession-compulsion, depression, anxiety, phobic anxiety and psychotism subscales, and the total SCL-90 score were statistically significantly higher in those participants without a pathological finding than in the controls. CONCLUSIONS: Regarding the high frequency of psychiatric disorders in patients with dyspeptic symptoms, we think that such patients should be evaluated by two separate departments, gastroenterology and psychiatry.

Acceptance of colonoscopy requires more than test tolerance.

BACKGROUND: Colon cancer screening, including colonoscopy, lags behind other forms of cancer screening for participation rates. The intrinsic nature of the endoscopic procedure may be an important barrier that limits patients from finding this test acceptable and affects willingness to undergo screening. With colon cancer screening programs emerging in Canada, test characteristics and their impact on acceptance warrant consideration. OBJECTIVES: To measure the acceptability of colonoscopy and define factors that contribute to procedural acceptability, in relation to another invasive gastrointestinal scope procedure, gastroscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing a colonoscopy (n=55) or a gastroscopy (n=33) were recruited. Their procedural experience was evaluated and compared pre-endoscopy, immediately before testing and postendoscopy. Questionnaires were used to capture multiple domains of the endoscopy experience and patient characteristics. RESULTS: Patient scope groups did not differ preprocedurally for general or procedure-specific anxiety. However, the colonoscopy group did anticipate more pain. Those who had a gastroscopy demonstrated higher preprocedural acceptance than those who had a colonoscopy. The colonoscopy group had a significant decrease in scope concerns and anxiety postprocedurally. As well, they reported less pain than they anticipated. Regardless, postprocedurally, the colonoscopy group's acceptance did not increase significantly, whereas the gastroscopy group was almost unanimous in their test acceptance. The best predictor of pretest acceptability of colonoscopy was anticipated pain. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that concerns that relate specifically to colonoscopy, including anticipated pain, influence acceptability of the procedure. However, the experience of a colonoscopy does not lead to improved test acceptance, despite decreases in procedural anxiety and pain. Patients' preprocedural views of the test are most important and should be addressed directly to potentially improve participation in colonoscopy.

[Patient satisfaction in gastrointestinal endoscopy: results of a multicenter study]. / Satisfacción del paciente con la endoscopia digestiva: resultados de un estudio multicéntrico.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the main quality problems perceived by patients in gastrointestinal endoscopy through a satisfaction survey. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 321 patients from five gastrointestinal endoscopy units were included. Telephone interviews using a previously validated questionnaire on several aspects related to the procedure were carried out. Pareto analyses were performed to pinpoint the most common aspects among the vital few causes at each medical center. Based on the questionnaire, the satisfaction indicators were calculated for each center: the overall satisfaction score (the sum of the responses to the eight questions) and the rate of perceived problems (number of questions with a negative response divided by the number of questions asked). RESULTS: The most frequent aspects among the vital few were waiting time for an appointment and discomfort during the examination, since both factors were included in the vital few in four of the five medical centers. Significant differences were found among centers in the overall satisfaction score (questionnaire score) (p < 0.001) and for the rate of perceived problems (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: According to the patients, the most problematic aspects were waiting time until the day of the appointment and discomfort during the examination. Perceived quality differed among the participating centers.

An investigation into the information received by patients undergoing a gastroscopy in a large teaching hospital in Ireland.

The purpose of this article is to examine the information received by patients undergoing a gastroscopy. The growing number and complexity of day-case endoscopy increases the need for quality patient information. Provision of patient information reduces anxiety, increases knowledge, improves cooperation during endoscopy and increases compliance with discharge instructions. The study used a descriptive survey with convenience sampling (response rate 66%, N = 137). Patients received most of the standard procedural information (how and why the procedure is carried out), but they received considerably less sensory information (information regarding what they would hear, feel, smell, etc.). In addition, age and gender appeared to affect the amount of information received. Older patients received more procedural information than younger patients, and male patients received more information than female patients. The nurse was the main source of information. The majority of patients (>80%) received adequate information and were satisfied with the information received. Patients also received most of the information verbally on the day of the procedure rather than before admission. This study identified the need for patient information leaflets. The role of the nurse and the effect of age and gender on information provision are important considerations for healthcare professionals.

Evaluation of patient satisfaction in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: Patient satisfaction questionnaires are a useful method for detecting opportunities for improvement on the basis of patient opinion. The aim of this study was to identify by means of a satisfaction questionnaire the main reasons for dissatisfaction in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred and thirty-seven patients (age 49+/-15 years, 53% women) who attended a gastrointestinal endoscopy unit were interviewed 3 weeks after undergoing upper endoscopy or colonoscopy, using a previously translated and validated GHAA-9 questionnaire modified for use in gastrointestinal endoscopy. In each case, the overall score median and the percentage of patients who gave negative (poor or fair) appraisals on each of the seven main questions were estimated. These data were used to perform a Pareto analysis. RESULTS: The overall questionnaire score median was 29 (interquartiles 25 and 75 over 26 and 32, respectively). Negative appraisal percentages for each of the seven questions were: waiting time until the appointment, 9.3%; waiting time on the day of examination, 3.5%; explanations, 3.9%; personal manner of staff, 0.5%; personal manner of the physician, 0.6%; discomfort, 3.5%; overall rating, 1.9%. The vital few found by Pareto analysis were questions regarding waiting time for appointment and adequacy of explanations regarding procedure. These questions accounted for 61% of the total number of problems encountered by patients. CONCLUSION: Questionnaires on satisfaction or quality perceived by patients allow the most frequent causes for dissatisfaction to be identified. The main problems patients encountered were waiting time until the appointment and explanations.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding in nursing homes: relatives' perceptions.

The aim of this study is to explore the experiences of relatives of nursing home residents receiving percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding. Qualitative methodology using semistructured interviews explores the experiences and perceptions of eight relatives. Data are analyzed using thematic analysis. Four themes are constructed from the data: dependence and resulting disempowerment, having minimal or no involvement in the decision-making process for PEG placement, betrayal, and the losses associated with the social aspects of eating. There is a need for professional education about the psychosocial implications of feeding and an increased level of support for relatives to assist them to develop coping strategies. This will require an expansion of current professional roles to include assessment of individual need, setting of appropriate goals, and the coordination of the provision of multiagency services, likely to include counseling and social support. Further research is required in this field to inform service developments.

The effect of an information brochure on patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to test the potential beneficial effects of an information brochure on undergoing a gastrointestinal endoscopy for the first time. The information provided was based on self-regulation theory, and patients could restrict themselves to reading the summary only. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to an experimental group receiving the brochure at least 1 day before the gastroscopy (N=47), or to a control group not receiving the brochure (N=48). RESULTS: The results show that all experimental subjects, except one, fully read the brochure. Those receiving the brochure experienced less anxiety before the gastroscopy and, afterwards, they reported greater satisfaction with the preparation for it. With regard to coping style there were some small moderating effects into the direction expected: low blunters (those not seeking distraction under impending threat) as compared to high blunters showed extra reduced anxiety after reading the brochure. They also tended to read the brochure more often. High monitors (those seeking information under impending threat) receiving the brochure showed reduced anxiety during the gastroscopy as compared to low monitors (tendency). CONCLUSION: We conclude that providing patients with the developed brochure constitutes an efficient, beneficial intervention. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The brochure could easily be implemented in standard practice without the necessity to take the patient's coping style into account.

[The psychoemotional condition of children in endoscopic examination].

Described in the paper is the instrumental examination of the psychoemotional condition of schoolchildren with esogastroenterologic pathology, who underwent, for the diagnostic purpose, esogastroduodenoscopy. It is demonstrated that the determination of the psychoemotional status in the course of dynamic follow-up optimizes the preparation of a child for endoscopy and smooths the anxiety during the procedure.

Are patients' sedation preferences at gastroscopy influenced by preceding patients' decisions?

BACKGROUND: When patients choose sedation or no sedation for gastroscopy, it is unknown whether the decision and experience of preceding patients on the same endoscopy list influence such decisions. AIM: To address this question in an endoscopy unit, where pre- and postprocedure patients are free to communicate. METHODS: The order and sedation decisions of 503 out-patients attending diagnostic gastroscopy lists were analysed. One hundred patients completed a preprocedural questionnaire about sedation preferences. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifteen (63%) patients chose no sedation. Men were more likely to be unsedated, 170 (72%), than women 158 (59%) (chi(2) = 9.1, P < 0.01). Age did not influence decisions. If the first patient on an endoscopy list requested sedation, 36% of subsequent patients were also sedated. This was similar to 38% of subsequently sedated patients on lists where the first patient was unsedated. Similar proportions of subsequent patients requested sedation when comparing lists where the first two patients were both sedated or both unsedated and when comparing lists where the first three patients were all sedated or all unsedated. Ninety per cent of the patients completing preprocedural questionnaires had made sedation choices before arrival; the remaining undecided patients had unsedated endoscopies. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' sedation decisions are not influenced by preceding patients' decisions. Most patients attending for out-patient gastroscopy have already decided about sedation.

Pseudo-achalasia following laparoscopically placed adjustable gastric banding.

BACKGROUND: The complication of pseudo-achalasia may occur after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) in patients with normal band position and normal stomal width. We hypothesized that this complication occurs especially in patients with preexisting insufficiency of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), who show poor compliance secondary to lacking the sensation of satiety and who therefore also have insufficient weight loss at follow-up. METHODS: Early and late postoperative barium meal studies of 120 LAGB patients were retrospectively analyzed to identify patients who developed esophageal widening and dysmotility despite normal band position and normal stomal width. Results were compared with preoperative endoscopies, clinical findings, each patient's compliance with dietary instructions and postoperative weight loss. RESULTS: 9/120 patients developed pouch dilatation, esophageal widening and esophageal dysmotility as a late complication, despite normal band position and normal stomal width. All these patients had shown preexisting insufficiency of their LES endoscopically. They all showed bad compliance with dietary instruction, and they all abused their distal esophagus as an additional pouch. 7 of these patients presented with insufficient weight loss at follow-up, whereas of 3 other patients with pre-existing LES insufficiency who had shown good compliance, only 1 showed insufficient weight loss. Insufficient weight loss after 1 year was significantly more common in patients with pre-existing LES insufficiency (8/12 patients, 67%) than in patients with a competent LES (26/108 patients, 24%). CONCLUSION: Patients with pre-existing LES insufficiency appear to be at risk for pouch dilatation and esophageal decompensation despite normal band position and normal stomal width. These patients are prone to show lack of satiety and poor compliance with dietary instruction, use of their lower esophagus as additional space for food, and tend to have insufficient weight loss. Preoperative manometry should be used to identify such patients, where the indication for gastric banding should be discussed very critically.

Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy among older adults in a community setting.

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) has become the preferred method to provide enteral tube feeding to older adults who have difficulty eating, but the impact of PEG on patient outcomes is poorly understood. The objective of this study was to describe changes in nutrition, functional status, and health-related quality of life among older adults receiving PEG. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. SETTING: A small community of approximately 60,000 residents served by two hospital systems. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty patients aged 60 and older receiving PEG from one of the four gastroenterologists practicing in the targeted community. MEASUREMENTS: Patients were assessed at baseline and every 2 months for 1 year to obtain clinical characteristics, process of care data, physical and cognitive function, subjective health status, nutritional status, complications, and mortality. RESULTS: Over a 14-month period, 150 patients received PEG tubes in the targeted community; the mean age was 78.9. The most frequent indications for the PEG were stroke (40.7%), neurodegenerative disorders (34.7%), and cancer (13.3%). All measures of functional status, cognitive status, severity of illness, comorbidity, and quality of life demonstrated profound and life-threatening impairment; 30-day mortality was 22% and 1-year mortality was 50%. Among patients surviving 60 days or more, at least 70% had no significant improvement in functional, nutritional, or subjective health status. Serious complications were rare, but most patients experienced symptomatic problems that they attributed to the enteral tube feeding. CONCLUSIONS: PEG tube feeding in severely and chronically ill older adults can be accomplished safely. However, there are important patient burdens associated with the PEG and there was limited evidence that the procedure improves functional, nutritional, or subjective health status in this cohort of older adults. The issues raised in this descriptive study provide impetus for a randomized trial of PEG tube feeding compared with alternative methods of patient care for older adults with difficulty eating.