Blood culture-free ultra-rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

Treatment assessment and patient outcome for sepsis depend predominantly on the timely administration of appropriate antibiotics1-3. However, the clinical protocols used to stratify and select patient-specific optimal therapy are extremely slow4. In particular, the major hurdle in performing rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) remains in the lengthy blood culture procedure, which has long been considered unavoidable due to the limited number of pathogens present in the patient's blood. Here we describe an ultra-rapid AST method that bypasses the need for traditional blood culture, thereby demonstrating potential to reduce the turnaround time of reporting drug susceptibility profiles by more than 40-60 h compared with hospital AST workflows. Introducing a synthetic beta-2-glycoprotein I peptide, a broad range of microbial pathogens are selectively recovered from whole blood, subjected to species identification or instantly proliferated and phenotypically evaluated for various drug conditions using a low-inoculum AST chip. The platform was clinically evaluated by the enrolment of 190 hospitalized patients suspected of having infection, achieving 100% match in species identification. Among the eight positive cases, six clinical isolates were retrospectively tested for AST showing an overall categorical agreement of 94.90% with an average theoretical turnaround time of 13 ± 2.53 h starting from initial blood processing.

Burden of Typhoid and Paratyphoid Fever in India.

BACKGROUND: In 2017, more than half the cases of typhoid fever worldwide were projected to have occurred in India. In the absence of contemporary population-based data, it is unclear whether declining trends of hospitalization for typhoid in India reflect increased antibiotic treatment or a true reduction in infection. METHODS: From 2017 through 2020, we conducted weekly surveillance for acute febrile illness and measured the incidence of typhoid fever (as confirmed on blood culture) in a prospective cohort of children between the ages of 6 months and 14 years at three urban sites and one rural site in India. At an additional urban site and five rural sites, we combined blood-culture testing of hospitalized patients who had a fever with survey data regarding health care use to estimate incidence in the community. RESULTS: A total of 24,062 children who were enrolled in four cohorts contributed 46,959 child-years of observation. Among these children, 299 culture-confirmed typhoid cases were recorded, with an incidence per 100,000 child-years of 576 to 1173 cases in urban sites and 35 in rural Pune. The estimated incidence of typhoid fever from hospital surveillance ranged from 12 to 1622 cases per 100,000 child-years among children between the ages of 6 months and 14 years and from 108 to 970 cases per 100,000 person-years among those who were 15 years of age or older. Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi was isolated from 33 children, for an overall incidence of 68 cases per 100,000 child-years after adjustment for age. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of typhoid fever in urban India remains high, with generally lower estimates of incidence in most rural areas. (Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; NSSEFI Clinical Trials Registry of India number, CTRI/2017/09/009719; ISRCTN registry number, ISRCTN72938224.).

2024 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: Utility of Blood Cultures in Adults, Children, and Pregnant People.

This article is part of a clinical practice guideline update on the risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this guideline, the panel provides recommendations for obtaining blood cultures in patients with known or suspected intra-abdominal infection. The panel's recommendations are based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.

Rapid Diagnostic Tests and Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs for the Management of Bloodstream Infection: What Is Their Relative Contribution to Improving Clinical Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Evidence about the clinical impact of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections is limited, and whether RDT are superior to conventional blood cultures (BCs) embedded within antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) is unknown. METHODS: We performed network meta-analyses using results from studies of patients with bloodstream infection with the aim of comparing the clinical impact of RDT (applied on positive BC broth or whole blood) to conventional BC, both assessed with and without ASP with respect to mortality, length of stay (LOS), and time to optimal therapy. RESULTS: Eighty-eight papers were selected, including 25 682 patient encounters. There was an appreciable amount of statistical heterogeneity within each meta-analysis. The network meta-analyses showed a significant reduction in mortality associated with the use of RDT + ASP versus BC alone (odds ratio [OR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], .59-.87) and with the use of RDT + ASP versus BC + ASP (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, .63-.96). No benefit in survival was found associated with the use of RDT alone nor with BC + ASP compared to BC alone. A reduction in LOS was associated with RDT + ASP versus BC alone (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, .84-.98) whereas no difference in LOS was shown between any other groups. A reduced time to optimal therapy was shown when RDT + ASP was compared to BC alone (-29 hours; 95% CI, -35 to -23), BC + ASP (-18 hours; 95% CI, -27 to -10), and to RDT alone (-12 hours; 95% CI, -20 to -3). CONCLUSIONS: The use of RDT + ASP may lead to a survival benefit even when introduced in settings already adopting effective ASP in association with conventional BC.

Emayella augustorita, New Member of Pasteurellaceae, Isolated from Blood Cultures of Septic Patient.

We report discovery of a new bacterial genus and species of the family Pasteurellaceae by using phylogenetic and metabolic analysis. The bacterium, Emayella augustorita, was isolated from blood cultures of a patient in France diagnosed with an adenocarcinoma of the intestines and who was treated with a biliary prosthesis placement.

Laboratory approaches to determining blood culture contamination rates: an ASM Laboratory Practices Subcommittee report.

Blood culture contamination (BCC) is the presence of specific commensal and environmental organisms cultivated from a single blood culture set out of a blood culture series and that do not represent true bacteremia. BCC can impact quality of care and lead to negative outcomes, unnecessary antibiotic exposure, prolonged hospital stays, and substantial costs. As part of the laboratory's quality management plan, microbiology laboratory personnel are tasked with monitoring BCC rates, preparing BCC rate reports, and providing feedback to the appropriate committees within their healthcare system. The BCC rate is calculated by the laboratory using pre-set criteria. However, pre-set criteria are not universally defined and depend on the individual institution's patient population and practices. This mini-review provides practical recommendations on elaborating BCC rate reports, the parameters to define for the pre-set criteria, how to collect and interpret the data, and additional analysis to include in a BCC report.

Clinical utility of multiplex PCR in the detection of pathogens from sterile body fluids.

Rapid identification of pathogens in normally sterile body fluid (NSBF) is essential for appropriate patient management, specifically antimicrobial therapy. Limited sensitivity and increased time to detection of traditional culture prompted us to evaluate additional testing to contribute to the diagnosis of infection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panels on positive body fluids inoculated into blood culture bottles for the detection of microorganisms. A total of 88 positive body fluids from blood culture bottles were analyzed using a Gram-Positive, Gram-Negative, and/or Fungal pathogen BCID Panel based on the Gram stain result. Each result was compared to routine culture performed from the positive bottle. When using culture as a reference standard, we found the ePlex multiplex panel performed with a positive percent agreement of 96.5% and a negative percent agreement of 99.8%. The use of multiplex PCR may be a useful supplement to routine culture for NSBF in blood culture bottles. IMPORTANCE: The identification of pathogens in normally sterile body fluid (NSBF) is performed using routine culture, the current gold standard. Limitations of this method include sensitivity and increased turnaround times which could potentially delay vital patient care, especially antimicrobial therapy. Adaptations of NSBF in blood culture bottles prompted us to consider the utility of additional methods to bridge the gap in diagnostic challenges for these life-threatening infections. Multiplex molecular panels have been manufactured for use with multiple specimen types including blood, cerebral spinal fluid, stool, and respiratory. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the off-label use of ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels on positive body fluids grown in blood culture bottles for the detection of microorganisms for research purposes.

Comparison of three rapid diagnostic tests for bloodstream infections using Benefit-risk Evaluation Framework (BED-FRAME).

Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for bloodstream infections have the potential to reduce time to appropriate antimicrobial therapy and improve patient outcomes. Previously, an in-house, lipid-based, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) method, Fast Lipid Analysis Technique (FLAT MS), has shown promise as a rapid pathogen identification method. In this study, FLAT MS for direct from blood culture identification was evaluated and compared to FDA-cleared identification methods using the Benefit-risk Evaluation Framework (BED-FRAME) analysis. FLAT MS was evaluated and compared to Bruker Sepsityper and bioMérieux BioFire FilmArray BCID2 using results from a previous study. For this study, 301 positive blood cultures were collected from the University of Maryland Medical Center. The RDTs were compared by their sensitivities, time-to-results, hands-on time, and BED-FRAME analysis. The overall sensitivity of all platforms compared to culture results from monomicrobial-positive blood cultures was 88.3%. However, the three RDTs differed in their accuracy for identifying Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, and yeast. Time-to-results for FLAT MS, Sepsityper, and BioFire BCID2 were all approximately one hour. Hands-on times for FLAT MS, Sepsityper, and BioFire BCID2 were 10 (±1.3), 40 (±2.8), and 5 (±0.25) minutes, respectively. BED-FRAME demonstrated that each RDT had utility at different pathogen prevalence and relative importance. BED-FRAME is a useful tool that can used to determine which RDT is best for a healthcare center.

Performance evaluation of machine-assisted interpretation of Gram stains from positive blood cultures.

Manual microscopy of Gram stains from positive blood cultures (PBCs) is crucial for diagnosing bloodstream infections but remains labor intensive, time consuming, and subjective. This study aimed to evaluate a scan and analysis system that combines fully automated digital microscopy with deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to assist the interpretation of Gram stains from PBCs for routine laboratory use. The CNN was trained to classify images of Gram stains based on staining and morphology into seven different classes: background/false-positive, Gram-positive cocci in clusters (GPCCL), Gram-positive cocci in pairs (GPCP), Gram-positive cocci in chains (GPCC), rod-shaped bacilli (RSB), yeasts, and polymicrobial specimens. A total of 1,555 Gram-stained slides of PBCs were scanned, pre-classified, and reviewed by medical professionals. The results of assisted Gram stain interpretation were compared to those of manual microscopy and cultural species identification by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). The comparison of assisted Gram stain interpretation and manual microscopy yielded positive/negative percent agreement values of 95.8%/98.0% (GPCCL), 87.6%/99.3% (GPCP/GPCC), 97.4%/97.8% (RSB), 83.3%/99.3% (yeasts), and 87.0%/98.5% (negative/false positive). The assisted Gram stain interpretation, when compared to MALDI-TOF MS species identification, also yielded similar results. During the analytical performance study, assisted interpretation showed excellent reproducibility and repeatability. Any microorganism in PBCs should be detectable at the determined limit of detection of 105 CFU/mL. Although the CNN-based interpretation of Gram stains from PBCs is not yet ready for clinical implementation, it has potential for future integration and advancement.

Evaluation of an expanded antibiotic resistance gene panel on prediction of antimicrobial susceptibility results for Gram-negative bacteria in blood cultures.

The QIAstat-Dx BCID Panels (RUO) ("QIAstat," QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) for identification of 13 Gram-negative bacteria and 18 antimicrobial resistance (AMR) gene groups was evaluated. The study was conducted in two phases; in phase 1, analytical performance was evaluated against 154 challenge isolates against whole genome sequencing data. In this phase, sensitivity and specificity of organism identification calls were 153/154 (99.3%) and 1,748/1,749 (99.8%), respectively. For AMR genes, sensitivity was 434/435 (99.8%) and specificity was 2,334/2,337 (99.9%). One false-negative blaIMP, one false-positive blaCTX-M, and two false-positive aac-6'-lb detections were noted in this challenge set of organisms. In phase 2, 101 clinical blood culture isolates of Gram-negative rods were evaluated by the multiplexed PCR versus reference broth microdilution, for the ability of identification combined with AMR genes to predict final susceptibility results. Negative predictive values were 92.8% for ampicillin resistance (100% for Escherichia coli), 93.4% for ceftriaxone, 97.4% for ceftazidime, and 98.7% for cefepime. In constrast, negative predictive values for current standard of care (identification plus detection of blaCTX-M) ranged from 56.5% to 88.8%. This study demonstrated additive value of additional beta-lactamase genes for bacteria isolated from blood cultures. IMPORTANCE: Prediction of Gram-negative bacteria resistance through detection of resistance genes is complex. This study evaluated a novel, direct-from-blood or bacterial isolate multiplexed PCR for the detection of 17 resistance genes, and evaluated the prediction of antimicrobial susceptibility.

Validation of short culture method for rapid bacterial identification of blood cultures via matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

BACKGROUND: Development of rapid bacterial identification from blood cultures has been an area of intense study in diagnostic microbiology. Shortened turnaround time coupled with antimicrobial stewardship interventions have been shown to improve patient outcomes and decrease healthcare-associated costs. OBJECTIVES: We report the validation of a short incubation method for Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial identification utilizing MALDI-TOF MS without additional instrumentation, processing or cost compared with current practice. METHODS: Prospective, observational, single-centre study in a quaternary care academic hospital encompassing 376 blood cultures subjected to bacterial identification after short incubation periods of 3-4 and 6-8 h. RESULTS: There was 97.5% species-level identification agreement with tests undertaken after 3-4 h incubation with 83.6% isolates identified, and 99.7% species-level identification agreement after 6-8 h incubation with 96.7% isolates identified. CONCLUSIONS: The short incubation method provides a rapid MALDI-TOF MS bacterial identification method, reducing turnaround time by 10-18 h compared with standard practice without additional cost, processing or instrumentation.

Usefulness of inclusion of ertapenem and temocillin screening breakpoints in the EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) for rapid detection of OXA-48-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae directly from positive blood cultures.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were: (i) to assess the ability of the meropenem screening breakpoint as part of the screening rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (sRAST) of EUCAST for the detection of OXA-48 carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae directly from positive blood cultures (BCs); and (ii) to evaluate the inclusion of ertapenem and temocillin discs into the sRAST to enhance the detection of OXA-48-producing isolates. METHODS: BC bottles were spiked with a total of 117 K. pneumoniae isolates, including 77 previously characterized OXA-48 producers and 40 non-OXA-48 producers. Disc diffusion assays were directly performed from positive BCs with meropenem (10 µg), ertapenem (10 µg) and temocillin (30 µg) discs, and inhibition zones were manually measured after 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation. The screening cut-off values of sRAST were applied to evaluate their capability in detecting OXA-48-producing isolates. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to illustrate the performance efficacy of the disc diffusion assays to detect OXA-48 producers. RESULTS: The meropenem cut-off values of sRAST only detected 90.91% of the OXA-48-producing isolates after 6 and 8 h of incubation. With the proposed cut-off points for ertapenem [<19 mm (4/6 h) and <20 mm (8 h)] and temocillin [<10 mm (4 h) and <11 mm (6/8 h)], all OXA-48-positive isolates were detected without any false-positive results at any reading time. CONCLUSIONS: In healthcare settings with a high prevalence of OXA-48 producers, the inclusion of ertapenem and temocillin discs in the sRAST procedure may improve the detection of OXA-48-producing K. pneumoniae isolates directly from positive BCs, providing reliable results after only a 4 h incubation period.

Retrospective evaluation of rapid genotypic ID and phenotypic AST systems on positive blood culture turnaround time and simulated potential impacts on bloodstream infection management.

BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections are linked to heightened morbidity and mortality rates. The consequences of delayed antibiotic treatment can be detrimental. Effective management of bacteraemia hinges on rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing. OBJECTIVES: This retrospective study examined the influence of the VITEK® REVEAL™ Rapid AST system on positive blood culture (PBC) management in a French tertiary hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 2021 and March 2022, 79 Gram-negative monomicrobial PBC cases underwent testing with both VITEK®REVEAL™ and VITEK®2 systems. RESULTS: The study found that VITEK®REVEAL™ yielded better results than the standard of care, significantly shortening the time to result (7.0 h compared to 9.6 h) as well as the turnaround time (15 h compared to 31.1 h) when applied for all isolates. CONCLUSIONS: This study implies that the use of VITEK®REVEAL™ enables swift adaptations of antibiotic treatment strategies. By considerably minimizing the turnaround time, healthcare professionals can promptly make necessary adjustments to therapeutic regimens. Notably, these findings underscore the potential of VITEK®REVEAL™ in expediting appropriate antibiotic interventions, even in less ideal conditions. Further studies in varied laboratory contexts are required to validate these encouraging outcomes.

Getting rapid diagnostic test data into the appropriate hands by leveraging pharmacy staff and a clinical surveillance platform: a case study from a US community hospital.

OBJECTIVES: To outline the procedural implementation and optimization of rapid diagnostic test (RDT) results for bloodstream infections (BSIs) and to evaluate the combination of RDTs with real-time antimicrobial stewardship team (AST) support plus clinical surveillance platform (CSP) software on time to appropriate therapy in BSIs at a single health system. METHODS: Blood culture reporting and communication were reported for four time periods: (i) a pre-BCID [BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panel] implementation period that consisted of literature review and blood culture notification procedure revision; (ii) a BCID implementation period that consisted of BCID implementation, real-time results notification via CSP, and creation of a treatment algorithm; (iii) a post-BCID implementation period; and (iv) a BCID2 implementation period. Time to appropriate therapy metrics was reported for the BCID2 time period. RESULTS: The mean time from BCID2 result to administration of effective antibiotics was 1.2 h (range 0-7.9 h) and time to optimal therapy was 7.6 h (range 0-113.8 h) during the BCID2 Panel implementation period. When comparing time to optimal antibiotic administration among patients growing ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales, the BCID2 Panel group (mean 2.8 h) was significantly faster than the post-BCID Panel group (17.7 h; P = 0.0041). CONCLUSIONS: Challenges exist in communicating results to the appropriate personnel on the healthcare team who have the knowledge to act on these data and prescribe targeted therapy against the pathogen(s) identified. In this report, we outline the procedures for telephonic communication and CSP support that were implemented at our health system to distribute RDT data to individuals capable of assessing results, enabling timely optimization of antimicrobial therapy.

Evaluating the impact of rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing for bloodstream infections: a review of actionability, antibiotic use and patient outcome metrics.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is a core function of the clinical microbiology laboratory and is critical to the management of patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) to facilitate optimal antibiotic therapy selection. Recent technological advances have resulted in several rapid methods for determining susceptibility direct from positive blood culture that can provide turnaround times in under 8 h, which is considerably shorter than conventional culture-based methods. As diagnostic results do not directly produce a medical intervention, actionability is a primary determinant of the effect these technologies have on antibiotic use and ultimately patient outcomes. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies consistently show that rapid AST significantly reduces time to results and improves antimicrobial therapy for patients with BSI across various methods, patient populations and organisms. To date, the clinical impact of rapid AST has been demonstrated in some observational studies, but randomized controlled trials have not been sufficiently powered to validate many of these findings. This article reviews various metrics that have been described in the literature to measure the impact of rapid AST on actionability, antibiotic exposure and patient outcomes, as well as highlighting how implementation and workflow processes can affect these metrics.

Detection of volatile organic compounds as new paradigm to accelerate antimicrobial susceptibility testing: performance evaluation of VITEK® REVEAL™.

OBJECTIVES: The measurement of VOCs release in the headspace of a bacterial culture represents a new approach to rapidly assess antimicrobial susceptibility. Herein, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of the VITEK® REVEAL™ system directly from a collection of Gram-negative positive blood cultures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty-eight positive blood cultures were included in the analysis (Enterobacterales, n = 95; Pseudomonas aeruginosa, n = 21; Acinetobacter baumannii complex, n = 12). Samples were processed using VITEK® REVEAL™ according to the manufacturer's recommendations, and MICs of 22 antimicrobials were compared with those obtained using reference methods. Categorical agreement (CA), essential agreement (EA) and categorical errors were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, 2220 strain/antibiotic pair combinations were analysed. Of these, most were classified as resistant by reference antimicrobial susceptibility testing (1091/2220; 48.7%). The overall CA and EA were 97.6% and 97.7%, respectively. CA ranged from 97.5% in Enterobacterales to 97.9% in both P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii complex. The overall number of categorical discrepancies were: 18 very major errors (1.6%), 13 major errors (1.2%) and 22 minor errors (2.4%). EA ranged from 95.2% in P. aeruginosa to 98.1% in Enterobacterales. Screening test for ESBL phenotype was positive, indeterminate and negative in 13.7%, 32.6% and 27.4% of Enterobacterales isolates tested by both VITEK® REVEAL™ and the reference method, showing 100% CA. CONCLUSIONS: VITEK® REVEAL™ represents a reliable tool to obtain antimicrobial susceptibility results of the main Gram-negative species directly from positive blood cultures with time to results of less than 8 h.

Epidemiology and clinical relevance of persistent bacteraemia in patients with Gram-negative bloodstream infection: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The risk factors and outcomes associated with persistent bacteraemia in Gram-negative bloodstream infection (GN-BSI) are not well described. We conducted a follow-on analysis of a retrospective population-wide cohort to characterize persistent bacteraemia in patients with GN-BSI. METHODS: We included all hospitalized patients >18 years old with GN-BSI between April 2017 and December 2021 in Ontario who received follow-up blood culture (FUBC) 2-5 days after the index positive blood culture. Persistent bacteraemia was defined as having a positive FUBC with the same Gram-negative organism as the index blood culture. We identified variables independently associated with persistent bacteraemia in a multivariable logistic regression model. We evaluated whether persistent bacteraemia was associated with increased odds of 30- and 90-day all-cause mortality using multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: In this study, 8807 patients were included; 600 (6.8%) had persistent bacteraemia. Having a permanent catheter, antimicrobial resistance, nosocomial infection, ICU admission, respiratory or skin and soft tissue source of infection, and infection by a non-fermenter or non-Enterobacterales/anaerobic organism were associated with increased odds of having persistent bacteraemia. The 30-day mortality was 17.2% versus 9.6% in those with and without persistent bacteraemia (aOR 1.65, 95% CI 1.29-2.11), while 90-day mortality was 25.5% versus 16.9%, respectively (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.24-1.89). Prevalence and odds of developing persistent bacteraemia varied widely depending on causative organism. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent bacteraemia is uncommon in GN-BSI but is associated with poorer outcomes. A validated risk stratification tool may be useful to identify patients with persistent bacteraemia.

A multisite validation of a two hours antibiotic susceptibility flow cytometry assay directly from positive blood cultures.

BACKGROUND: Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is urgently needed to provide safer treatment to counteract antimicrobial resistance. This is critical in septic patients, because resistance increases empiric therapy uncertainty and the risk of a poor outcome. We validate a novel 2h flow cytometry AST assay directly from positive blood cultures (PBC) by using a room temperature stable FASTgramneg and FASTgrampos kits (FASTinov® Porto, Portugal) in three sites: FASTinov (site-1), Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain (site-2) and Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal (site-3). A total of 670 PBC were included: 333 spiked (site-1) and 337 clinical PBC (151 site-2 and 186 site-3): 367 gram-negative and 303 gram-positive. Manufacturer instructions were followed for sample preparation, panel inoculation, incubation (1h/37ºC) and flow cytometry analysis using CytoFlex (Site-1 and -2) or DxFlex (site-3) both instruments from Beckman-Coulter, USA. RESULTS: A proprietary software (bioFAST) was used to immediately generate a susceptibility report in less than 2 h. In parallel, samples were processed according to reference AST methods (disk diffusion and/or microdilution) and interpreted with EUCAST and CLSI criteria. Additionally, ten samples were spiked in all sites for inter-laboratory reproducibility. Sensitivity and specificity were >95% for all antimicrobials. Reproducibility was 96.8%/95.0% for FASTgramneg and 95.1%/95.1% for FASTgrampos regarding EUCAST/CLSI criteria, respectively. CONCLUSION: FASTinov® kits consistently provide ultra-rapid AST in 2h with high accuracy and reproducibility on both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. This technology creates a new paradigm in bacterial infection management and holds the potential to significantly impact septic patient outcomes and antimicrobial stewardship.

Blood-rsCDM: a new rapid and simplified carbapenemase detection method for detecting carbapenemases in Enterobacterales directly from positive blood cultures.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to validate and evaluate a new rapid and simplified method, called Blood-rsCDM, for the detection and characterization of carbapenemase using 3-aminophenylboronic acid (APBA) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) ß-lactamase inhibitors from positive blood cultures. METHOD: We utilized a panel of 172 Enterobacterales strains, including blaKPC (77), blaNDM (48), blaIMP (9), blaVIM (2), blaOXA-181 (2), blaKPC and blaNDM (6), as well as 28 carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacterales isolates, to assess the performance of Blood-rsCDM and the EDTA-carbapenem inactivation method (eCIM). Carbapenemase class was determined using specific inhibitors at 4 h and 6 h by Blood-rsCDM. RESULTS: Blood-rsCDM exhibited a sensitivity of 97.9% at both time points, with a specificity of 100%, regardless of the culture duration. The sensitivity of eCIM was 94.4%, with a specificity of 100%. Blood-rsCDM accurately characterized KPC-producing isolates as 77/77, metallo-ß-lactamases (MBLs) as 58/59, and KPC and NDM carbapenemases as 6/6 at 4 h. There was no difference in results between the 4 h and 6 h time points. However, Blood-rsCDM could not differentiate OXA-181-producing strains. For eCIM, the characterization numbers for KPC-, OXA-181-, and MBLs-producing strains were 77/77, 2/2, and 57/59, respectively, but it failed to detect the coproduction of KPC and NDM isolates. CONCLUSION: Blood-rsCDM accurately discriminates carbapenemase within 4 h and is capable of directly differentiating multi-enzyme (KPC and NDM) presence from positive blood culture broths. Therefore, Blood-rsCDM represents a rapid, simple, easy-to-read, and accurate tool that can be utilized in resource-limited settings.

Streptococcus taonis sp. nov., a novel bacterial species isolated from a blood culture of a patient.

One Gram stain-positive, catalase-negative, α-hemolytic, chain-forming or paired cocci, designated ST22-14T, was isolated from a blood culture of a child with suspected infection. The results of 16S rRNA gene sequences analyses showed that the most closely related species to strain ST22-14T were "Streptococcus vulneris" DM3B3T (99.2%), Streptococcus mitis NCTC 12261T (99.0%), "Streptococcus gwangjuense" ChDC B345T, (99.0%), Streptococcus oralis subsp. dentisani 7747T (99.0%), Streptococcus downii CECT 9732T (99.0%), and Streptococcus infantis ATCC 700779T (98.9%). The genome of strain ST22-14T consists of 2,053,261 bp with a G + C content of 39.4%. Average nucleotide identity values between strain ST22-14T and Streptococcus mitis NCTC 12261T or other five species were from 82.2 to 88.0%. In silico DNA-DNA hybridization of ST22-14T showed an estimated DNA reassociation value of 34.6% with the closest species. The main cellular fatty acids of strain ST22-14T were 16:0, 18:0, 14:0, 18:1ω7c and 18:1ω6c. Based on these results, strain ST22-14T should be classified as a novel species of genus Streptococcus, for which the name Streptococcus taonis sp. nov. is proposed (type strain ST22-14T = NBRC 116002T = BCRC 81402T).