Interaction of Ethanol and Oral ANS-6637, a Selective ALDH2 Inhibitor in Males: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single-Ascending Dose Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: ANS-6637, an orally bioavailable selective and reversible aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 (ALDH2) inhibitor, is under development for drug and alcohol use disorders. During the elimination of alcohol, ALDH2 metabolizes acetaldehyde to acetate; inhibiting this enzyme can lead to aversive reactions due to the accumulation of acetaldehyde. Thus, understanding the safety and tolerability of ANS-6637 in combination with alcohol is essential. TRIAL DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty eight healthy males participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-ascending dose cohort study of oral ANS-6637. Eligible participants were randomized to ANS-6637 (n = 36) or placebo (n = 12) in a 3:1 fashion in each of 6 dose cohorts (8 per cohort; ANS-6637 dose levels were 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, and 600 mg). Two hours after receiving study drug, participants drank up to 5 standard drinks, 1 every 30 minutes. Safety assessments, pharmacodynamic measures, and pharmacokinetic blood samples were obtained. RESULTS: Flushing was the most common adverse event (AE) associated with ANS-6637 (24 of 36 participants) compared with placebo (3 of 12). Statistically significant, but modest, increases in heart rate (HR) occurred (+10.5 bpm after 2 drinks; +16.9 to + 20.5 bpm after 3rd through 5th drink). No participant met HR or systolic blood pressure criteria for stopping ethanol administration. There were no clinically significant QTc interval prolongations. Individuals receiving ANS-6637 reported lower ratings of liking, alcohol effects, and feeling drunk. CONCLUSIONS: A single oral dose of ANS-6637 with up to 5 standards drinks over 2.5 hours was generally well tolerated in healthy males. The most common pharmacological response was flushing and an increase in HR, which are known effects of acetaldehyde accumulation and consistent with inhibition of ALDH2 with oral ANS-6637 in combination with alcohol. The results of this alcohol interaction study support further testing of ANS-6637 in individuals who consume alcohol heavily.

Can Lipoic Acid Attenuate Cardiovascular Disturbances Induced by Ethanol and Disulfiram Administration Separately or Jointly in Rats?

The exogenous lipoic acid (LA) is successfully used as a drug in the treatment of many diseases. It is assumed that after administration, LA is transported to the intracellular compartments and reduced to dihydrolipoic acid (DHLA) which is catalyzed by NAD(P)H-dependent enzymes. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether LA can attenuate cardiovascular disturbances induced by ethanol (EtOH) and disulfiram (DSF) administration separately or jointly in rats. For this purpose, we measured systolic and diastolic blood pressure, recorded electrocardiogram (ECG), and estimated mortality of rats. We also studied the activity of aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) in the rat liver. It was shown for the first time that LA partially attenuated the cardiac arrhythmia (extrasystoles and atrioventricular blocks) induced by EtOH and reduced the EtOH-induced mortality of animals, which suggests that LA may have a potential for use in cardiac disturbance in conditions of acute EtOH intoxication. The administration of EtOH, LA, and DSF separately or jointly affected the ALDH activity in the rat liver since a significant decrease in the activity of the enzyme was observed in all treatment groups. The results indicating that LA is an inhibitor of ALDH activity are very surprising.

A Case of Disulfiram-Induced Psychosis in a Previously Asymptomatic Patient Maintained on Mixed Amphetamine Salts: A Review of the Literature and Possible Pathophysiological Explanations.

Although perhaps better known as an irreversible aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitor causing increased acetaldehyde levels after concomitant intake of ethanol, disulfiram or one of its metabolites (diethyldithiocarbamate) also inhibit dopamine ß-hydroxylase, an enzyme that converts dopamine to norepinephrine. This mechanism has been advanced as a possible explanation for the development of psychosis, during disulfiram treatment, either in monotherapy or in combination therapy, when interaction-emergent psychosis could be causal. We present a young woman who was taking mixed amphetamine salts for treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and developed a short-lived psychosis after introduction of disulfiram. The psychotic symptoms resolved after discontinuation of both medications, without the use of antipsychotic drugs. We proceed with a review of the literature of disulfiram-induced psychosis and discuss pathophysiological theories that possibly were involved in our patient's phenomenology.

Cephalosporin induced disulfiram-like reaction: a retrospective review of 78 cases.

Concomitant ingestion of alcohol and cephalosporin may cause a disulfiram-like reaction; however its fatal outcomes are not commonly known. We retrospectively reviewed 78 patients who had cephalosporin induced disulfiram-like reaction (CIDLR). The patients who had a negative skin test to cephalosporin prior to intravenous antibiotics were included, and those who were allergic to either alcohol or antibiotics were excluded. The average age of 78 patients was 37.8±12.2 (21-60) years. Of the 78 patients, 93.58% of the patients were males, 70.51% of the patients consumed alcohol after use of antibiotics, and 29.49% patients consumed alcohol initially, followed by intravenous antibiotics; however, no significant difference of morbidity was observed in these two groups. All patients were administered antibiotics intravenously. Five of 78 patients (6.41%) developed severe CIDLR too urgently to be rescued successfully. In conclusion, it is important for clinicians to educate patients that no alcohol should be used if one is taking cephalosporin. Also, clinicians should keep in mind that cephalosporin should not be prescribed for any alcoholics.