Bleeding and response to hemostatic therapy in acquired hemophilia A: results from the GTH-AH 01/2010 study.

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is due to autoantibodies against coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) and most often presents with unexpected bleeding. In contrast to congenital hemophilia, the patient's residual FVIII activity does not seem to correlate with the risk of bleeding as suggested from previous studies. Risk factors for bleeding have not been described. We used data from the prospective GTH-AH 01/2010 study to assess the risk of bleeding and the efficacy of hemostatic therapy. FVIII activity was measured at baseline and weekly thereafter. Bleeding events were assessed by treating physicians. A total of 289 bleeds were recorded in 102 patients. There were 141 new bleeds observed starting after day 1 in 59% of the patients, with a mean rate of 0.13 bleed per patient-week in weeks 1 to 12, or 0.27 bleed per patient-week before achieving partial remission. Weekly measured FVIII activity was significantly associated with the bleeding rate, but only achieving FVIII activity ≥50% abolished the risk of bleeding. A good World Health Organization performance status assessed at baseline (score 0 vs higher) was associated with a lower bleeding rate. Hemostatic treatment was reportedly effective in 96% of bleeds. Thus, the risk of new bleeds after a first diagnosis of AHA remains high until partial remission is achieved, and weekly measured FVIII activity may aid in assessing the individual risk of bleeding. These results will help to define future strategies for prophylaxis of bleeding in AHA.

Hemostatic Efficacy and Anti-FXa (Factor Xa) Reversal With Andexanet Alfa in Intracranial Hemorrhage: ANNEXA-4 Substudy.

Background and Purpose: Andexanet alfa is a recombinant modified human FXa (factor Xa) developed to reverse FXa inhibition from anticoagulants. Hemostatic efficacy and reversal of anti-FXa activity with andexanet were assessed in patients from the ANNEXA-4 study (Andexanet Alfa, a Novel Antidote to the Anticoagulation Effects of FXa Inhibitors) with intracranial hemorrhage (ICrH). Methods: ANNEXA-4 was a single-arm study evaluating andexanet in patients presenting with major bleeding ≤18 hours after taking an FXa inhibitor. Patients received a bolus plus 2-hour infusion of andexanet. Brain imaging in patients with ICrH was performed at baseline and at 1 and 12 hours postandexanet infusion. Coprimary efficacy outcomes were change in anti-FXa activity and hemostatic efficacy at 12 hours (excellent/good efficacy defined as ≤35% increase in hemorrhage volume/thickness). Safety outcomes included occurrence of thrombotic events and death at 30 days. Results: A total of 227 patients with ICrH were included in the safety population (51.5% male; mean age 79.3 years) and 171 in the efficacy population (99 spontaneous and 72 traumatic bleeds). In efficacy evaluable patients, excellent/good hemostasis 12 hours postandexanet occurred in 77 out of 98 (78.6%) and in 58 out of 70 (82.9%) patients with spontaneous and traumatic bleeding, respectively. In the subanalysis by FXa inhibitor treatment group in the efficacy population, median of percent change in anti-FXa from baseline to nadir showed a decrease of 93.8% for apixaban-treated patients (n=99) and by 92.6% for rivaroxaban-treated patients (n=59). Within 30 days, death occurred in 34 out of 227 (15.0%) patients and thrombotic events occurred in 21 out of 227 (9.3%) patients (safety population). Conclusions: Andexanet reduced anti-FXa activity in FXa inhibitor-treated patients with ICrH, with a high rate of hemostatic efficacy. Andexanet may substantially benefit patients with ICrH, the most serious complication of anticoagulation. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02329327.

Characterisation and application of recombinant FVIII-neutralising antibodies from haemophilia A inhibitor patients.

The development of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) is a serious outcome of treatment strategies involving biological medicines. Coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) is used to treat haemophilia A patients, but its immunogenicity precludes a third of severe haemophiliac patients from receiving this treatment. The availability of patient-derived anti-drug antibodies can help us better understand drug immunogenicity and identify ways to overcome it. Thus, there were two aims to this work: (i) to develop and characterise a panel of recombinant, patient-derived, monoclonal antibodies covering a range of FVIII epitopes with varying potencies, kinetics and mechanism of action, and (ii) to demonstrate their applicability to assay development, evaluation of FVIII molecules and basic research. For the first objective we used recombinant antibodies to develop a rapid, sensitive, flexible and reproducible ex vivo assay that recapitulates inhibitor patient blood using blood from healthy volunteers. We also demonstrate how the panel can provide important information about the efficacy of FVIII products and reagents without the need for patient or animal material. These materials can be used as experimental exemplars or controls, as well as tools for rational, hypothesis-driven research and assay development in relation to FVIII immunogenicity and FVIII-related products.

Current status of haemophilia inhibitor management in mainland China: a haemophilia treatment centres survey on treatment preferences and real-world clinical practices.

To investigate the current experience and expertise for haemophilia inhibitor patient management in haemophilia treatment centres (HTCs) in mainland China. Questionnaires were distributed to 'tertiary tier A' hospital HTCs across China to collect information on treatment preferences for bleeding control, prophylaxis and inhibitor eradication, as well as their regimens in real-world clinical practice. Of 40 questionnaires distributed, 39 were returned. In all, 38 were analysable for treatment preferences and 34 for actual clinical practice. For haemostatic treatment, 76·3% (29/38) HTCs preferred activated recombinant human Factor VII (rFVIIa). In clinical practice, the most widely used by-pass agent was prothrombin complex concentrate (26 HTCs). Although 65·8% (25/38) of HTCs believed prophylaxis treatment was necessary, it was prescribed in only 12. Similarly, 65·8% (25/38) of HTCs believed immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy was necessary but only 14·8% (92/622) of patients in 19 HTCs received low-dose ITI treatment. HTCs in relatively economically developed cities (with higher-than-average per-capita gross domestic product) had better access to haemostatic treatment, coagulation testing and were more likely to provide prophylaxis and ITI in practice. The present survey showed there were gaps in haemophilia inhibitor care between the HTC physicians' preferences and their actual clinical practice. More specific care guidelines, education and clinical decision support tools are needed to guide clinical practice.

Subcutaneous concizumab prophylaxis in hemophilia A and hemophilia A/B with inhibitors: phase 2 trial results.

Results from the main parts (24 weeks) of 2 concizumab phase 2 trials are presented: explorer4 in hemophilia A (HA) or B (HB) with inhibitors (HAwI/HBwI) and explorer5 in HA. The trials aimed to evaluate the efficacy of daily subcutaneous concizumab prophylaxis (evaluated as annualized bleeding rate [ABR] at last dose level), with secondary objectives being safety and immunogenicity (assessed as number of adverse events [AEs] and antidrug antibodies [ADAs]). Patients received 0.15 mg/kg concizumab, with potential dose escalation to 0.20 and 0.25 mg/kg (if ≥3 spontaneous bleeding episodes within 12 weeks of concizumab treatment). Relevant pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters were assessed. Thirty-six HA, 9 HAwI, and 8 HBwI patients were exposed to concizumab. Most inhibitor patients (15 of 17; 88.2%) did not escalate the dose; all patients chose to continue to the extension phase of the trials. Clinical proof of concept for prevention of bleeding episodes was demonstrated in both trials. Estimated ABRs in HAwI and HBwI were lower vs HA: 3.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7; 5.3) and 5.9 (95% CI, 4.2; 8.5) vs 7.0 (95% CI, 4.6; 10.7), respectively. PK/PD results were as expected, with no difference between hemophilia subtypes for concizumab exposure, free tissue factor pathway inhibitor, thrombin generation, prothrombin fragment 1+2, and d-dimers. Concizumab was safe and well tolerated (no severe AEs, AE-related withdrawals, or thromboembolic events). Three patients had (very low to medium titer) ADA+ tests in each trial, with no observed clinical effect. These results support further development of concizumab as a daily prophylactic treatment in all hemophilia patients. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03196284 and #NCT03196297.

Treatment of acquired hemophilia A, a balancing act: results from a 27-year Dutch cohort study.

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a severe auto-immune bleeding disorder. Treatment of AHA is burdensome and optimal management is still unresolved. Therefore a retrospective nationwide multi-center cohort study (1992-2018) was performed to evaluate clinical presentation and treatment efficacy and safety of AHA in the Netherlands. Multivariate logistic and Cox regression analysis was used to study independent associations between patient characteristics and clinical outcomes. A total of 143 patients (median age 73 years; 52.4% male) were included with a median follow-up of 16.8 months (IQR 3.6-41.5 months). First-line immunosuppressive treatment was mostly steroid monotherapy (67.6%), steroids/cyclophosphamide (11.9%) and steroids/rituximab (11.9%), with success rates of 35.2%, 80.0% and 66.7% respectively, P < .05. Eventually 75% of patients achieved complete remission (CR). A high anti-FVIII antibody titer, severe bleeding and steroid monotherapy were associated with lower CR rates. Infections, the most important adverse event, occurred significantly more often with steroid combination therapy compared to steroids alone (38.7% vs 10.6%; P = .001). Overall mortality was 38.2%, mostly due to infections (19.2%) compared to 7.7% fatal bleeds. Advanced age, underlying malignancy and ICU admission were predictors for mortality. This study showed that AHA is characterized by significant disease-related and treatment-related morbidity and mortality. A high anti-FVIII titer, severe bleeding and steroid monotherapy were associated with a lower CR rate. The efficacy of steroid combination therapies however, was overshadowed by higher infection rates and infections represented the most important cause of death. The challenging and delicate balance between treatment effectivity and safety requires ongoing monitoring of AHA and further identification of prognostic markers.

Prophylaxis Using a Mixture of Plasma-Derived Activated Factor VII and Factor X (pdFVIIa/FX) in a Patient with Hemophilia B Complicated by Inhibitors and Allergy to Factor IX Concentrates: A Case Report.

Treating patients with hemophilia and inhibitors is often problematic. The presence of inhibitors negatively impacts the effectiveness of treatment to achieve hemostasis especially in patients with hemophilia B, owing mainly to allergic reactions to factor IX (FIX) concentrates and the low success rate of immune tolerance therapy. A 9-month-old boy had intracranial hemorrhage and was diagnosed with hemophilia B. After replacement therapy, he developed inhibitors and an allergic reaction to FIX. Prophylactic therapy was initiated with recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) and later switched to pdFVIIa/factor X (FX; 120 µg/kg as the FVII dose, every other day) because of a recurrence of intracranial hemorrhage. Since then, he remained well without life-threatening bleeding for more than 2 years. Our case suggests that pdFVIIa/FX may be useful for prophylactic therapy in hemophilia B complicated by inhibitors and allergic reaction to FIX concentrates.

Congenital Factor XIII Deficiency With the Presence of Inhibitor: A Case Study.

Coagulation factor XIII (FXIII) is a fibrin-stabilizing factor with additional roles in wound healing and interactions between the decidua and fetus. Congenital FXIII deficiency is rare bleeding disorder. Inhibitor development against FXIII in inherited FXIII deficency is also uncommon, but may cause severe, life-threatening bleeding. FXIII is the last step in the coagulation cascade with normal coagulation paramaters (PT, aPTT), the detection of inhibitor to FXIII is quite difficult. The treatment of inhibitor-positive congenital FXIII deficiency is challenging due to the lack of a role of by-pass agents such as FVII. The best known ways of treatment in these cases are the use of high-dose FXIII concentrates and immunosuppression. Herein, we report the management of postoperative bleeding diathesis in a patient with FXIII deficiency who developed inhibitors, and to follow the clinical course of the disease with FXIII concentrate and immunosuppression.

First observation of inhibitor development against efmoroctocog alfa in France.

In patients with severe haemophilia receiving clotting factor concentrates, the risk of immunisation against their usual treatment is still patent and feared. New haemophilia drug treatments with an extended half-life have become available over the past few years. The risk of inhibitor development to these new treatments is unclear. We report the case of a 51-year-old man with severe haemophilia A, who was previously treated with no history of inhibitor development. Soon after a switch in his treatment to efmoroctocog alfa he developed an inhibitor against this recombinant Fc fusion extended half-life FVIII (rFc-FVIII) product. The patient was on an on-demand treatment regimen and was treated for mucosal bleeding. The inhibitor was characterised as type I, with classical epitope mapping. The spontaneous evolution of this inhibitor was favourable, but an anamnestic response led to a switch in his treatment to emicizumab.

Prediction of the haemostatic effects of bypassing therapy using comprehensive coagulation assays in emicizumab prophylaxis-treated haemophilia A patients with inhibitors.

In emicizumab prophylaxis, the concomitant therapy using bypassing agents (BPAs) is required for breakthrough bleeding and invasive procedures with attention to thrombotic complications. To predict coagulant effects of BPAs in emicizumab-treated patients with haemophilia A (PwHA) with inhibitor (PwHAwI), blood samples from emicizumab-treated PwHAwI (n = 8) and PwHA without inhibitor (n = 2) in phase 1/2 and HAVEN 1 study, spiked with activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC) or recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) ex vivo, and blood samples from emicizumab-treated PwHAwI-receiving BPAs were analysed by Ca2+ -triggered rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and ellagic acid/tissue factor-triggered clot waveform analysis (CWA). Spiked aPCC, corresponded to 10-100 U/kg, markedly shortened ROTEM parameters beyond the normal range, while spiked rFVIIa, corresponded to 90-270 µg/kg, shortened them within near-normal range. Each of the spiked BPA-improved adjusted maximum coagulation velocity of CWA to within or near the normal range. In blood samples at post-infusion of aPCC (44-73 U/kg) or rFVIIa (79-93 µg/kg), the parameters of both assays improved to approximately the normal range. Taken together, ex vivo results of spiking tests in ROTEM and CWA, except aPCC spiking test in ROTEM, were relatively consistent with in vivo ones, and could usefully predict the coagulant effects of concomitant bypassing therapy for emicizumab-treated PwHAwI.

Product type and the risk of inhibitor development in nonsevere haemophilia A patients: a case-control study.

Inhibitor development is a major complication of treatment with factor VIII concentrates in nonsevere haemophilia A. It has been suggested that plasma-derived factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates elicit fewer inhibitors than recombinant FVIII concentrates, but studies in severe haemophilia A patients have shown conflicting results. We designed a case-control study to investigate the clinical and genetic risk factors for inhibitor development in nonsevere haemophilia A patients. We investigated whether the type of FVIII concentrate was associated with inhibitor development in nonsevere haemophilia A patients. This nested case-control study includes 75 inhibitor patients and 223 controls, from a source population of the INSIGHT study, including all nonsevere haemophilia A patients (FVIII:C 2-40%) that were treated with FVIII concentrates in 33 European and one Australian centre. Cases and controls were matched for date of birth and cumulative number of exposure days (CED) to FVIII concentrate. A conditional logistic regression model was used to calculate unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios. No increased risk for inhibitor development was found for any type of FVIII concentrate; either when comparing recombinant FVIII concentrates to plasma-derived FVIII concentrates (adjusted odds ratio 0·96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·36-2·52) or for specific types of FVIII concentrates.

Thrombin generation in plasma of patients with haemophilia A and B with inhibitors: Effects of bypassing agents and antithrombin reduction.

Antithrombin (AT) reduction has been shown to improve thrombin generation (TG) in haemophilia with or without inhibitors. As treatment with bypassing agents (BPAs) may be required in patients with breakthrough bleeding while receiving AT-lowering therapy, we assessed TG in platelet-poor plasma samples from haemophilia patients in the presence of BPA (recombinant activated factor VII [rFVIIa; 1.25 or 2.5 µg mL-1] or activated prothrombin complex concentrate [aPCC; 0.5 or 1 U mL-1]) and AT reduction (anti-AT antibody). Mean ± SEM baseline peak thrombin height was 19.9 ± 4.3 nM in plasma from haemophilia patients (n = 12) and 230.5 ± 9.8 nM in healthy males (n = 24). Reduced AT improved mean peak thrombin height in haemophilia patient plasma to 75.4 ± 17.4 nM. Spiking of 90% AT-reduced haemophilia patient plasma with 2.5 µg mL-1 rFVIIa or 1 U mL-1 aPCC increased the mean peak thrombin height to 82.5 ± 12 nM and 134.8 ± 18.7 nM, respectively. Peak thrombin levels did not exceed the range for healthy volunteers when plasma samples from haemophilia patients with in vitro AT reduction were treated with BPAs, suggesting the potential use of BPAs in conjunction with AT reduction. Further clinical investigations are needed to confirm the safety of this approach.

Prophylaxis therapy with bypassing agents in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors undergoing surgery: A cost analysis in Spain.

OBJECTIVES: This study estimated the cost of prophylaxis with activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) and recombinant activated factor VIIa (rFVIIa) in surgical patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors in Spain. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was developed to estimate the cost to the Spanish National Health System of providing haemostatic coverage in this haemophilia population, with age distribution and average weight derived from the literature, and the annual number of surgeries (0.33 per patient) from local data. Drug costs were calculated from official ex-factory prices with a 7.5% mandatory deduction and recommended dosing regimens. RESULTS: The estimated average costs per patient were €10 100.73 (aPCC) and €14 265.89 (rFVIIa) for dental extraction, €24 043.88 (aPCC) and €62 301.08 (rFVIIa) for minor surgery and €126 595.81 (aPCC) and €347 731.09 (rFVIIa) for major surgery. Assuming an estimated 23 annual surgeries in this population (N = 69), distributed as 19% dental extraction, 50% minor surgery and 31% major surgery, the total annual cost of prophylaxis was €1 209 682.35 with aPCC and €3 221 929.28 with rFVIIa. CONCLUSIONS: aPCC costs were 62.5% lower than rFVIIa. Assuming potential clinical equivalence, aPCC is a potentially cost-saving option for surgical patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors.

Successful Management of Acquired Factor V Inhibitor by Monitoring Factor V Activity, Antigen, and Inhibitor Values during Immunosuppressive Therapy.

Acquired factor V inhibitor (AFVI) results from the formation of autoantibodies to coagulation factor V (FV), and the clinical phenotype can range from asymptomatic laboratory abnormalities to life-threatening bleeds. We describe a 74-year-old man who developed AFVI along with a massive subcutaneous hematoma. He was initially treated with prednisolone (PSL), but AFVI recurred when the dose was reduced after a short period. We subsequently increased the PSL dose and added cyclophosphamide (CY), which resulted in a complete response. We then gradually tapered PSL and stopped CY, and the patient has since remained free of recurrent AFVI symptoms. We monitored FV activity, antigen concentrations, and inhibitor titers of this patient throughout the clinical course. The ratio of FV activity to antigen concentration was low at diagnosis and gradually increased along with the patient's improvement. This ratio might be a useful parameter for evaluating the effects of immunosuppressive therapy in patients with AFVI.

Acquired Factor V Inhibitor with Hemorrhagic Symptoms after Prasugrel Hydrochloride Treatment.

Acquired factor V inhibitor (AFVI) is a rare coagulopathy. It may be triggered by specific antigens such as antibiotics. We herein report the first case of AFVI after treatment with prasugrel hydrochloride (prasugrel) in an 80-year-old male who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention because of angina pectoris 6 years ago and was initiated on aspirin and ticlopidine hydrochloride. He was switched from ticlopidine hydrochloride to prasugrel before undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction. Fifteen days later, he developed sudden nasal hemorrhage, hematuria, and systemic purpura. Coagulation tests revealed prolonged prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (11.35) and activated partial thromboplastin time (170 s). The coagulation factor profile revealed a decreased FV activity (1%). The Bethesda assay for FV inhibitor was positive. AFVI was diagnosed; prasugrel was immediately discontinued, and administration of recombinant activated factor VII and prednisolone were initiated. Hemorrhagic symptoms immediately disappeared; FV activity improved, and the FV inhibitor titer was normalized.

Profile of natural anticoagulant, coagulant factor and anti-phospholipid antibody in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

The outbreak of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has now become a global pandemic. Coagulopathy has been reported widely in critically ill COVID-19 patients and was related to high mortality. However, the comprehensive coagulation profiles have not been examined and the underlying mechanism of the coagulopathy in COVID-19 patients is unclear. To study the coagulation profiles of routine hemostasis tests, natural anticoagulants, coagulant factors and antiphospholipid antibodies in critically ill COVID-19 patients. This single-center and cross-section study included 19 patients with COVID-19, who were admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) at Tongji hospital in Wuhan, China, from Feb 23 to Mar 3, 2020. Demographic data, laboratory parameters, treatments and clinical outcomes of the patients were collected and analyzed. The final date of follow-up was Mar 31, 2020. In this study, 12 thrombotic events occurred in 9 patients, including 4 cerebral infarctions, 7 acro-ischemia and 1 internal jugular vein thrombosis. The common abnormalities of routine coagulation tests included evelated D-Dimer level (100%), prolonged prothrombin time (73.7%) and hyperfibrinogenemia (73.7%). The median activities of natural anticoagulants including protein C, protein S and antithrombin were all below the normal range. Factor VIII activities were significantly above normal range (median value 307%, IQR 198-441) in all patients. Factor V and factor VII activities were significantly lower in near-terminal stage patients. Anti-phospholipid antibodies were present in 10 patients. Strikingly, 4 cerebral infarction events were in patients had anti-phospholipid antibodies of multiple isotypes. Sustained hypercoagulable status and thrombotic events were common in critically ill patients with COVID-19. The low activities of natural anticoagulants, elevated factor VIII level and the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, together, may contribute to the etiopathology of coagulopathy in COVID-19 patients.

Advances in the Treatment of Hemophilia: Implications for Laboratory Testing.

BACKGROUND: Until recently, clinical laboratories have monitored hemophilia treatment by measuring coagulation factors before/after infusion of human-derived or recombinant factors. Substantial changes are expected in the near future based on new therapeutic approaches that have been or are being developed. CONTENT: Hemophilia treatment includes replacement therapy with human-derived/recombinant factors or treatment with bypassing agents for patients without or with inhibitors, respectively. Accordingly, laboratory methods for monitoring include one-stage clotting or chromogenic assays meant to measure either factor VIII/IX or global coagulation tests to measure the effect of bypassing agents. Recently, modified long-acting coagulation factors have been introduced for which discrepant results may be expected when measurement is performed with one-stage clotting or chromogenic assays. Currently, novel drugs not based on coagulation factors are under development and are being tested in clinical studies. These drugs do require new methods and therefore laboratory evaluation of hemophilia will undergo dramatic changes in the near future. SUMMARY: From the analysis of the current practice and literature, we draw the following conclusions: (a) Thrombin generation or thromboelastometry are the logical candidate assays to monitor bypassing agents. (b) Considerable differences are expected when measuring modified long-acting coagulation factors, depending on whether one-stage or chromogenic assays are used. Although no definitive conclusions can presently be drawn, chromogenic assays are probably more suitable than one-stage clotting. (c) Novel drugs not based on coagulation factors such as emicizumab, fitusiran, or concizumab that are entering the market do require alternative methods that are not yet well established.

A very potent factor V inhibitor interferes with the levels of all coagulation factors and causes a fatal hemorrhagic syndrome.

We report a very high factor V inhibitor affecting the measurement of all coagulation factors besides fibrinogen, all these factors being dramatically decreased. This inhibitor could be linked to antibiotic use. The patient died of massive hemorrhage before a plasma exchange could be initiated.

Inhibitors in haemophilia A and B: Management of bleeds, inhibitor eradication and strategies for difficult-to-treat patients.

The standard therapy for patients with haemophilia is prophylactic treatment with replacement factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX). Patients who develop inhibitors against FVIII/FIX face an increased risk of bleeding, and the likelihood of early development of progressive arthropathy, alongside higher treatment-related costs. Bypassing agents can be used to prevent and control bleeding, as well as the recently licensed prophylaxis, emicizumab, but their efficacy is less predictable than that of factor replacement therapy. Antibody eradication, by way of immune tolerance induction (ITI), is still the preferred management strategy for treating patients with inhibitors. This approach is successful in most patients, but some are difficult to tolerise and/or are unresponsive to ITI, and they represent the most complicated patients to treat. However, there are limited clinical data and guidelines available to help guide physicians in formulating the next treatment steps in these patients. This review summarises currently available treatment options for patients with inhibitors, focussing on ITI regimens and those ITI strategies that may be used in difficult-to-treat patients. Some alternative, non-ITI approaches for inhibitor management, are also proposed.

Case Report: Development of Factor VIII Inhibitor in a Patient with an Uncommon de novo Mutation in the Factor VIII Gene.

The development of factor VIII inhibitors remains a significant clinical challenge in the management of hemophilia A. We present a patient of mixed ethnicity with severe hemophilia A who was found to have a F8 gene hemizygous c.5815G>T mutation resulting in an Ala1939Ser substitution (Ala1920Ser in legacy nomenclature) and possible splice site change that has been reported in only 1 patient previously. He developed an inhibitor shortly after starting replacement recombinant factor VIII (Advate®; Baxalta, Bannockburn, IL, USA) and was successfully treated with immune tolerance therapy. Our report describes the second patient reported to have severe hemophilia due to this mutation and the only case of a factor VIII inhibitor associated with this mutation.