Pharmacokinetic similarity of switching SAR341402 insulin aspart biosimilar and NovoLog insulin aspart versus continuous use of NovoLog in adults with type 1 diabetes: The GEMELLI X trial.

AIM: To assess whether multiple switches between SAR341402 biosimilar insulin aspart (SAR-Asp) and the insulin aspart reference product (NovoLog; NN-Asp) leads to equivalent pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure compared with continuous use of NN-Asp in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study randomized (1:1) 210 subjects with T1D treated with once-daily insulin glargine U100 as basal insulin to four 4-week periods of alternating multiple daily injections of SAR-Asp and NN-Asp (NN-Asp for the first 4 weeks, SAR-Asp in the last 4 weeks; switching group) versus 16 weeks of continuous NN-Asp (non-switching group). At week 16, a single dose (0.15 U/kg) of SAR-Asp in the switching group (n = 95) or NN-Asp in the non-switching group (n = 105) was given in the morning before breakfast. Primary PK endpoints were area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) of SAR-Asp versus NN-Asp after the single dose at week 16. RESULTS: The extent of PK exposure was similar between the two treatments (SAR-Asp in the switching group and NN-Asp in the non-switching group) at week 16, with point estimates of treatment ratios close to 1. The 90% confidence intervals for AUC treatment ratios were contained within 0.8-1.25. For Cmax in the primary analysis set, the upper confidence limit was 1.32. This was because of the profiles of three participants with implausible high values. A prespecified sensitivity analysis excluding implausible values showed results contained within 0.8-1.25. CONCLUSIONS: PK exposure of SAR-Asp (switching group) and reference NN-Asp (non-switching group) were similar, supporting interchangeability between these two insulin aspart products.

Glargine insulin loaded lipid nanoparticles: Oral delivery of liquid and solid oral dosage forms.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The oral administration of insulin has so far been precluded by gastro-intestinal enzyme degradation and poor intestinal absorption. Preliminary evidence for peptide uptake by the gut has recently been obtained, by our research group, following the administration of nanostructured lipid-carrier suspensions loaded with glargine insulin in healthy animal models. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this experimental study, glargine insulin-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers have been converted into solid oral dosage forms (tablets, capsules), that are more suitable for administration in humans and have prolonged shelf-life. The liquid and solid oral dosage forms were tested for glargine insulin uptake and glucose responsivity in healthy and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats (6 animals in each group). A suitable composition gave redispersible solid oral dosage forms from glargine insulin-loaded carriers, using both spray-drying and freeze-drying. It was observed that the liquid and solid formulations had relevant hypoglycaemic effects in healthy rats, while only capsules were efficacious in diabetic rats; probably because of gut alterations in these animal models. Detected glargine insulinaemia was consistent with a glycaemic profile. CONCLUSION: The formulations under study showed their potential as oral glucose-lowering agents, particularly when used as capsules. However, further study is needed to produce a useful orally-active insulin preparation.

Insulin depot absorption modeling and pharmacokinetic simulation with insulin glargine 300 U/mL
.

OBJECTIVE: Mathematical models of insulin absorption have been used to predict plasma insulin concentrations after administration, but few are specifically applicable to insulin glargine, which precipitates subcutaneously after injection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The formation and redissolution of subcutaneous depots of insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) and insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) are modeled. Surface-area-dependent redissolution is introduced to established diffusion and absorption pathways, and pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles are simulated and subsequently validated using experimental data from euglycemic glucose clamp studies. Simulations are used to predict the PK effect of adapting the timing of once-daily insulin injections and of switching from one insulin product to the other. -Results: Simulated PK profiles resemble those previously observed in clinical trials, with Gla-300 providing more gradual and prolonged release of Gla-300 vs. Gla-100, owing to a more compact depot. The predicted PK profile of Gla-300 shows less fluctuation in plasma insulin concentrations than that of Gla-100, and may be better suited to adapting the timing of daily injections to account for variation in daily activities. Simulating a switch from one insulin glargine product to the other results in temporary alteration of previous steady state, but this is regained within ~ 3 days. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that PK differences between Gla-300 and Gla-100 are a product of the more compact Gla-300 depot and its smaller surface area. The model employed also allowed estimation of insulin glargine concentrations when varying the time interval between injections as well as when switching from one insulin glargine product to the other.
.

Optimal prandial timing of bolus insulin in diabetes management: a review.

The inability to achieve optimal diabetes glucose control in people with diabetes is multifactorial, but one contributor may be inadequate control of postprandial glucose. In patients treated with multiple daily injections of insulin, both the dose and timing of meal-related rapid-acting insulin are key factors in this. There are conflicting opinions and evidence on the optimal time to administer mealtime insulin. We performed a comprehensive literature search to review the published data, focusing on the use of rapid-acting insulin analogues in patients with Type 1 diabetes. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of rapid-acting insulin analogues, together with postprandial glucose excursion data, suggest that administering these 15-20 min before food would provide optimal postprandial glucose control. Data from clinical studies involving people with Type 1 diabetes receiving structured meals and rapid-acting insulin analogues support this, showing a reduction in post-meal glucose levels of ~30% and less hypoglycaemia when meal insulin was taken 15-20 min before a meal compared with immediately before the meal. Importantly, there was also a greater risk of postprandial hypoglycaemia when patients took rapid-acting analogues after eating compared with before eating.

Single-dose euglycaemic clamp studies demonstrating pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic similarity between MK-1293 insulin glargine and originator insulin glargine (Lantus) in subjects with type 1 diabetes and healthy subjects.

AIMS: MK-1293 is an insulin glargine that has an amino acid sequence identical to that of Lantus, the originator insulin glargine. Two euglycaemic clamp studies, 1 in subjects with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and 1 in healthy subjects, were conducted to demonstrate pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) similarity between MK-1293 and Lantus commercially procured in both the European Union (EU-Lantus) and the USA (US-Lantus). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Both studies were single-dose, randomized, double-blind, single-centre, crossover studies with ≥7 days between dosing periods. A 2-treatment, 4-period replicate crossover study in T1D subjects (N = 76) compared the PK and PD of MK-1293 to EU-Lantus for 30 hours after dosing. A 3-period crossover study in healthy subjects (N = 109) compared the PK and PD of MK-1293, EU-Lantus and US-Lantus for 24 hours after dosing. In both studies, all subjects received single 0.4 units/kg subcutaneous doses of MK-1293 or Lantus in all dosing periods. Pharmacokinetic assessment was based on LC-MS/MS-based measurement of the major insulin glargine metabolite (M1) and PD was characterized using the euglycaemic clamp platform. RESULTS: In both studies, pre-specified similarity criteria were met between MK-1293 and Lantus for comparison of PK (AUC0-24 and Cmax of M1) and PD (GIR-AUC0-24 , GIR-AUC0-12 , GIR-AUC12-24 , and GIRmax ) primary endpoints. All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Based on comparative assessment in both T1D and healthy subjects, it can be concluded that the PK and PD properties of MK-1293 are highly similar to those of Lantus. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02059174).

Unmet needs in children with diabetes: the role of basal insulin.

The goal of insulin therapy in people affected by type 1 diabetes mellitus consists in achieving an optimal metabolic control and so HbA1c levels below 7.5%, according to the conclusions of relevant scientific studies. In any case it seems that this target is far from being achieved, mostly in the pediatric population. However, many important pharmacological, technological and cultural milestones have been placed both in therapy and management of insulin-dependent diabetes even if the gap between growing knowledge in these fields and its application in daily clinical practice appears still too wide. A fundamental component of these advancements concerns the design of new insulin basal analogues; molecules used to realize a basal-bolus model of therapy with MDI scheme. Degludec insulin has been recently approved for the pediatric utilization (aged 1 to 17 years). A registration trial for pediatric population (aged 6 to 17 years) is in progress for glargine U-300 insulin. These two insulin types have different biochemical and pharmacological properties and they represent two different ways to achieve the ideal basal analogue. Insulin degludec and insulin glargine U-300 are the newest basal analogues and each of them has proper pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics. Their characteristics represent an effort to create the ideal solution. The aim of this review is to summarize the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of these new insulins, to list the most significant scientific findings regarding their pharmacology as well as clinical uses, with particular reference to the pediatric population in order to declare them to clinical experience and to report data on an initial experience with these analogues, especially with degludec insulin. Once again, evolution goes through the specialized training of the staff involved in the care of the diabetic patient and the constant education of the latter.

Glucodynamics of long-acting basal insulin peglispro compared with insulin glargine at steady state in patients with type 1 diabetes: substudy of a randomized crossover trial.

AIMS: To compare, in an open-label, randomized, crossover phase II substudy, the glucodynamics of insulin glargine and those of basal insulin peglispro (BIL) in patients with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Patients (n = 23) underwent 24-h euglycaemic clamps after 8 weeks of treatment with glargine or with BIL. Clinically-titrated basal insulin doses (BIL group 16-64 U; glargine group 19-60 U) were administered on the morning of the clamp. RESULTS: At baseline, the patients' mean ± standard deviation (s.d.) body mass index was 26.78 ± 4.20 kg/m2 and glycated haemoglobin was 7.69 ± 0.99%. The mean ± s.d. endpoint dose for the BIL group was 0.42 ± 0.13 U/kg and for the glargine group was 0.42 ± 0.10. The daily mean ± s.d. blood glucose concentration was 7.7 ± 1.2 in the BIL group and 7.9 ± 1.2 mmol/l in the glargine group (p = 0.641). The mean ± s.d. total and nocturnal hypoglycaemia rates/30 days were 2.7 ± 2.3 and 0.5 ± 0.8, respectively, for the BIL group, and 3.0 ± 2.4 and 0.7 ± 1.1, respectively, for the glargine group (p = 0.112 and 0.428). The mean glucose infusion rate (GIR) normalized to insulin unit was lower for BIL than for glargine. One patient in the glargine group and eight patients in the BIL group had minimal (<0.8 g/kg) GIRs over 24 h. The mean ± s.d. total glucose infused over 24 h (GTOT(0-24) ) was 1.22 ± 0.82 g/kg in the BIL group and 1.90 ± 1.01 g/kg in the glargine group (p = 0.002). The mean ± s.d. total glucose infused during hours 0-6 (GTOT(0-6) ) was 0.21 ± 0.22 in the BIL group and 0.41 ± 0.22 g/kg in the glargine group (p < 0.001), while the mean total glucose infused during hours 18-24 (GTOT(18-24) ) in the BIL group was 0.28 ± 0.18 g/kg and in the glargine group was 0.35 ± 0.23 g/kg (p = 0.198). The peak-to-trough ratio was 1.41 for BIL versus 2.22 for glargine. CONCLUSIONS: BIL has a flatter profile than glargine, with potentially more stable metabolic control. The lower GTOT(0-24) observed in the BIL group is consistent with BIL's reduced peripheral action.

A review of the safety and efficacy data for insulin glargine 300 units/ml, a new formulation of insulin glargine.

Insulin glargine 100 units/ml (Gla-100) has become a standard of care in diabetes treatment over the past decade, providing 24-h basal insulin coverage after once-daily subcutaneous injection for many people with diabetes, with a well-established efficacy and safety profile. New insulin glargine 300 units/ml (Gla-300) is a basal insulin that provides the same number of units as Gla-100 in a third of the volume. Compared with Gla-100, Gla-300 has shown more constant and prolonged pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles. This review summarizes the findings from the EDITION series of clinical trials that investigated Gla-300 in individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Overall, Gla-300 has been shown to achieve similar glycaemic control with less, or similar, nocturnal hypoglycaemia compared with Gla-100, and a trend towards lower hypoglycaemia at any time of day. The EDITION series of clinical trials also provides some evidence for less weight gain with Gla-300 than with Gla-100. In addition, the PK/PD profiles of Gla-300 may allow more flexibility in the timing of doses, improving convenience; thus, Gla-300 could offer several positive features for individuals with diabetes requiring basal insulin therapy.

Insulin glargine metabolite 21(A) -Gly-human insulin (M1) is the principal component circulating in the plasma of young children with type 1 diabetes: results from the PRESCHOOL study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Insulin glargine metabolite 21(A) -Gly-human insulin (M1) is the principal component circulating in plasma of adults with type 1 diabetes. The objective of this study was to confirm this finding in young children and to rule out accumulation of parent insulin glargine. DESIGN AND METHODS: Children with type 1 diabetes from the PRESCHOOL study, aged 2-6 yr, were treated with insulin glargine for 24 wk (n = 62). Blood samples were drawn at weeks 1, 2, and 4 approximately 24 h after the last dose and analyzed for glargine, M1, and Thr(30B) -des-M1 (M2) using immunoaffinity purification and liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry. The lower limit of quantification was 33 pmol/L for all analytes. RESULTS: M1 was the principal active component circulating in plasma. Mean (SD) plasma Ctrough values were 101 (138), 80 (122), and 79 (102) pmol/L following glargine doses of 0.33 (0.02), 0.34 (0.02), and 0.38 (0.03) U/kg at weeks 1, 2, and 4, respectively. Parent insulin glargine and M2 concentrations were below the level of quantification. These results are in line with those observed in adults and indicate no accumulation of the parent compound in this patient population. CONCLUSION: In young children with type 1 diabetes, the principal component circulating in plasma after subcutaneous injection of insulin glargine is M1, the pharmacologically active component. No accumulation of the parent insulin glargine was observed. These data provide additional evidence on the safety profile of insulin glargine in young children (Clinical trial identifier: NCT00993473).

New Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL for the Treatment of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of new insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) as a basal insulin in the treatment of type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 (T2DM) diabetes mellitus. DATA SOURCES: A literature search of MEDLINE was conducted (January 2008-June 2015) using the terms U300, Gla-300, and insulin glargine 300 units/mL and supplemented with congress abstracts published in 2014 and 2015. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All English language studies assessing the efficacy and/or safety of Gla-300 were evaluated. DATA SYNTHESIS: The efficacy and safety of once-daily Gla-300 has been compared with insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) in the EDITION trials, 6 phase-3, multinational, open-label studies in T1DM and T2DM. Across these studies, Gla-300 consistently demonstrated glycemic control comparable to Gla-100; a mean (standard error) change in glycated hemoglobin A1c of -1.02% (0.03) with both Gla-100 (n = 1235) and Gla-300 (n = 1239) was seen in a patient-level meta-analysis. Gla-300 was associated with comparable or reduced nocturnal hypoglycemia compared with Gla-100; the relative risk for nocturnal hypoglycemia with Gla-300 versus Gla-100 was 0.75 (95% CI = 0.68 to 0.83) in a patient-level meta-analysis. There is also some evidence for less weight gain with Gla-300 compared with Gla-100, despite a higher insulin dose. Gla-300 was well tolerated, with the number of adverse events being comparable to that with Gla-100. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that Gla-300 may have a place as an alternative, long-acting basal insulin for patients with T1DM or T2DM, with the possibility for improved tolerability.

Investigational new insulin glargine 300 U/ml has the same metabolism as insulin glargine 100 U/ml.

Insulin glargine is processed in vivo into soluble 21(A) -Gly-human insulin (M1), the principal moiety responsible for metabolic effects, and subsequently into M2. This sub-study compared metabolism and metabolite pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of investigational new insulin glargine U300 (Gla-300) with insulin glargine 100 U/ml (Gla-100, Lantus®, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) in people with type 1 diabetes. Participants received 0.4 (n = 18) or 0.6 U/kg Gla-300 (n = 12), and 0.4 U/kg Gla-100 (n = 30) once daily in randomized order for 8 days prior to a 36-h euglycaemic clamp. Metabolites were quantified using immunoaffinity enrichment and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Glargine metabolism was the same regardless of Gla-100 or Gla-300 administration; M1 was confirmed as the principal active moiety circulating in blood. Steady state concentrations of M1 were achieved after 2 days for Gla-100, and 4 days for Gla-300. Steady state M1 values defined prolonged and even flatter PK profiles after Gla-300 administration compared with M1 profiles after Gla-100.

[Daytime flexible application of Insulin degludec in patients with type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes]. / Tageszeitlich flexible Gabe von Insulin degludec bei Patienten mit Typ-1-Diabetes oderTyp-2-Diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Insulin degludec (IDeg) is a basal insulin with a stable, flat action profile and an even distribution of the blood glucose lowering effect over 24 hou rs. The terminal half-life of IDeg is about 25 hours, which reflects a mean prolongation by factor 2 compared to Insulin glargin (lGlar).This may enable for a more flexible daytime dosing versus up to now available basal insulins. METHOD: Two open, randomized, treat-to-target studies enrolled patients with type 1 diabetes (n =493) or type 2 diabetes (n = 687). Both phase 3 studies compared a daytime flexible dosing of IDeg (IDeg-flex) with IDeg at the evening meal (IDeg-evening) and IDler at a fixed daytime. In the IDeg-flex-group dosing intervals were predefined with variations between 8 and 40 hours. RESULTS: In patients with type 1 diabetes IDeg-flex proved to be non-inferior with respect to reduction of HbA1C (-0.40%) versus IDeg-evening (-0.41%) and IGlar (-0.58%) after 26 weeks. In addition, nocturnal hypoglycemic events were reduced by 40% (p < 0.01) with IDeg-flex versus IGlar. In patients with type 2 diabetes reduction of HbA1C with ID)eg-flex (-1.28%) was non-inferior to IDeg-evening (-1.07%) and IGlar (-1.26%), respectively, whereas rates for hypoglycemia were comparable. CONCLUSION: Patients with diabetes mellitus are enabled to dose a basal insulin flexibly when needed (minimum interval of 8 hours afterthe last injection is necessary). Impacts of this treatment option on quality of life and adherence and outcomes should be examined in observational trials.

A comparative evaluation of bioequivalence of Gan & Lee glargine U300 and Toujeo® in Chinese healthy male participants.

Background: To assess the bioequivalence between Gan & Lee (GL) glargine U300 and Toujeo® regarding pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and safety in Chinese healthy male participants. Methods: A single-center, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, two-preparation, two-sequence, four-cycle repeated crossover design study was performed to compare GL glargine U300 and Toujeo® in 40 healthy participants. The primary PK endpoints were the area under the curve of glargine metabolites, M1 concentration from 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24h), and the maximum glargine concentration within 24 hours post-dose (Cmax). The primary PD endpoints were the area under the glucose infusion rate (GIR) curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUCGIR.0-24h) and the maximum GIR within 24 hours post-dose (GIRmax). Results: GL Glargine U300 demonstrated comparable PK parameters (AUC0-24h, Cmax, AUC0-12h, and AUC12-24h of M1) and PD responses [AUCGIR.0-24h, GIRmax, AUCGIR.0-12h, and AUCGIR.12-24h] to those of Toujeo®, as indicated by 90% confidence intervals ranging from 80% to 125%. No significant disparities in safety profiles were observed between the two treatment groups, and there were no reported instances of serious adverse events. Conclusion: The PK, PD, and safety of GL glargine U300 were bioequivalent to that of Toujeo®. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/, identifier CTR20212419.

Modeling Subcutaneous Absorption of Long-Acting Insulin Glargine in Type 1 Diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Subcutaneous (sc) administration of long-acting insulin analogs is often employed in multiple daily injection (MDI) therapy of type 1 diabetes (T1D) to cover patient's basal insulin needs. Among these, insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) and 300 U/mL (Gla-300) are formulations indicated for once daily sc administration in MDI therapy of T1D. A few semi-mechanistic models of sc absorption of insulin glargine have been proposed in the literature, but were not quantitatively assessed on a large dataset. The aim of this paper is to propose a model of sc absorption of insulin glargine able to describe the data and provide precise model parameters estimates with a clear physiological interpretation. METHODS: Three candidate models were identified on a total of 47 and 77 insulin profiles of T1D subjects receiving a single or repeated sc administration of Gla-100 or Gla-300, respectively. Model comparison and selection were performed on the basis of their ability to describe the data and numerical identifiability. RESULTS: The most parsimonious model is linear two-compartment and accounts for the insulin distribution between the two compartments after sc administration through parameter k. Between the two formulations, we report a lower fraction of insulin in the first versus second compartment (k = 86% versus 94% in Gla-100 versus Gla-300, p < 0.05), a lower dissolution rate from the first to the second compartment ([Formula: see text] versus 0.0008 min-1 in Gla-100 versus Gla-300, p << 0.001), and a similar rate of insulin absorption from the second compartment to plasma ([Formula: see text] versus 0.0016 min-1 in Gla-100 versus Gla-300, p = NS), in accordance with the mechanisms of insulin glargine protraction. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed model is able to both accurately describe plasma insulin data after sc administration and precisely estimate physiologically plausible parameters. SIGNIFICANCE: The model can be incorporated in simulation platforms potentially usable for optimizing basal insulin treatment strategies.

In Silico Head-to-Head Comparison of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL and Insulin Degludec 100 U/mL in Type 1 Diabetes.

Background: Second-generation long-acting insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) and degludec 100 U/mL (Deg-100) provide novel basal insulin therapies for the treatment of type 1 diabetes (T1D). Both offer a flatter pharmacokinetic (PK) profile than the previous generation of long-acting insulins, thus improving glycemic control while reducing hypoglycemic events. This work describes an in silico head-to-head comparison of the two basal insulins on 24-h glucose profiles and was used to guide the design of a clinical trial. Materials and Methods: The Universities of Virginia (UVA)/Padova T1D simulator describes the intra-/interday variability of glucose-insulin dynamics and thus provides a robust bench-test for assessing glucose control for basal insulin therapies. A PK model describing subcutaneous absorption of Deg-100, in addition to the one already available for Gla-300, has been developed based on T1D clinical data and incorporated into the simulator. One hundred in silico T1D subjects received a basal insulin dose (Gla-300 or Deg-100) for 12 weeks (8 weeks uptitration, 4 weeks stable dosing) by morning or evening administration in a basal/bolus regimen. The virtual patients were uptitrated to their individual doses with two different titration rules. Results: The last 2-week simulated continuous glucose monitoring data were used to calculate various outcome metrics for both basal insulin treatments, with primary outcome being the percent time in glucose target (70-140 mg/dL). The simulations show no statistically significant difference for Gla-300 versus Deg-100 in the main endpoints. Conclusions: This work suggests comparable glucose control using either Gla-300 or Deg-100 and was used to guide the design of a clinical trial intended to compare second-generation long-acting insulin analogues.

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of a new type of recombinant insulin Lisargine injection.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant insulin Lisargine is a new type of insulin. In this study, we aimed to compare its pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) with Lantus. METHODS: The PD test was performed by exploring the effect of single administration on blood glucose of normal rats and STZ-induced diabetic rats, and the effect of multiple administrations on blood glucose of STZ-induced diabetic rats. Further PD tests include receptor affinity test, receptor autophosphorylation test and adipocyte glucose uptake test. Four IU and 8 IU per dog Lisargine was used for PK test, insulin was measured and area under curve (AUC) was calculated. RESULTS: With single injection, Lisargine 1.5 IU/kg had significant hypoglycemic effects at 1 and 2 h, similar to that of Lantus. Lisargine 5 IU/kg and 10 IU/kg lowered the blood glucose of STZ-induced diabetic rats at 1, 2, 4 & 6 h significantly. With multiple injections, Lantus lowered blood glucose at 2, 4 & 6 h, Lisargine 2.5 IU/kg, 5 IU/kg, and 10 IU/kg lowered blood glucose at 2 & 4 h significantly, compared with vehicle. There was no difference for receptor affinity test, receptor autophosphorylation test and adipocyte glucose uptake test between Lisargine and Lantus. The PK of Lisargine and Lantus of healthy Beagle dogs was very similar. CONCLUSIONS: This animal study demonstrated that PK and PD of Lisargine and Lantus were similar, suggesting the bioequivalence of these products.

In Silico Examination of Initiation of Long-Acting Insulin Analogs Toujeo Compared to Lantus Under 3 Dosing Titration Rules in Virtual Type 2 Diabetes Subjects.

BACKGROUND: Despite the benefits and clinical necessity of insulin treatment in type 2 diabetes (T2D), healthcare providers are reluctant to initiate insulin, and patients are reluctant to start it for several reasons, one of these being the complexity of insulin treatment. Patients and their healthcare providers can benefit from titration algorithms (TAs) or rules that assist with the initiation and titration of insulin, performing the calculations that are needed to safely initiate and conservatively adjust. METHODS: The primary objective for this in silico study was to examine the effectiveness of 3 dose TAs (1-3) for optimization of basal insulin glargine (Gla-100 and Gla-300). In the simulations, 100 virtual subjects with T2D were included (50% men, age 62 ± 3 years, HbA1c 8.1% ± 2.9%, body weight 94 ± 16 kg). Subjects were studied under each TA (TA1 and TA2 fasting blood glucose [FBG] targets 90-130 mg/dL, TA3 FBG target 110-150 mg/dL). Initial dose of both insulins was based on 0.2 U/kg body weight. During 3 months, subjects reported their FBG to the LTHome web-based dose guidance system with a rules engine to safely guide long-acting insulin titration and maintenance. Subjects followed dose recommendations to reach designated FBG target ranges. RESULTS: All subjects reached stable doses under all TAs with both Gla-100 and Gla-300 insulin, and 93 or more of the 100 subjects, depending on the assigned TA, achieved the target FBG range within the 3-month simulation for all TAs. Mean FBG was lowered (Gla-100: 155 ± 40 to 118 ± 11 mg/dL with TA1 and TA2 and 132 ± 12 mg/dL for TA3; Gla-300: 125 ± 14 with TA1 and TA2 and 134 ± 15 mg/dL with TA3). Calculated HbA1c improved from 8.1% ± 2.9% to 7.1% ± 2.5% for TA1 and TA2 and 7.5% ± 2.5% for TA3, a reduction of 0.9% and 0.6% over 3 months for both insulins. Three subjects on Gla-100 and one subject on Gla-300 experienced mild hypoglycemia. CONCLUSION: All TAs delivered safe dose recommendations with minimal hypoglycemia, leading to a stable glucose control in the majority of subjects.

Comparison of pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of insulin degludec and insulin glargine 300 U/mL in healthy cats.

Insulin glargine 300 U/mL (IGla-U300) and insulin degludec (IDeg) are synthetic insulin analogs designed as basal insulin formulations. In people, IGla-U300 is more predictable and longer acting compared with glargine 100 U/mL. The duration of action of IDeg in people is > 42 h, allowing flexibility in daily administration. We hypothesized that IDeg would have longer duration of action compared with IGla-U300 in healthy purpose-bred cats. Seven cats received 0.4 U/kg (subcutaneous) of IDeg and IGla-U300 on two different days, >1 wk apart. Exogenous insulin was measured and pharmacodynamic parameters were derived from glucose infusion rates during isoglycemic clamps and suppression of endogenous insulin. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess normality, and normally distributed parameters were compared using paired t-tests. There was no difference between IDeg and IGla-U300 in onset, peak action, or total metabolic effect. On average, time to peak action (TPEAK) of IGla-U300 was 145 ± 114 min (95% confidence interval [CI] = 25-264) longer than TPEAK of IDeg (P = 0.03) and duration of action (TDUR) of IGla-U300 was 250 ± 173 min (95% CI = 68-432) longer than TDUR of IDeg (P = 0.02). The "flatness" of the time-action profile (as represented by the quotient of peak action/TDUR) was significantly greater for IGla-U300 compared with IDeg (P = 0.04). Overall, insulin concentration measurements concurred with findings from isoglycemic clamps. Based on these data, IDeg is not suitable for once-daily administration in cats. The efficacy of once-daily IGla-U300 in diabetic cats should be further investigated.