Dutch Guideline on Knee Arthroscopy Part 1, the meniscus: a multidisciplinary review by the Dutch Orthopaedic Association.

Background and purpose - A guideline committee of medical specialists and a physiotherapist was formed on the initiative of the Dutch Orthopedic Association (NOV) to update the guideline Arthroscopy of the Knee: Indications and Treatment 2010. This next guideline was developed between June 2017 and December 2019. In this Part 1 we focus on the meniscus, in Part 2 on all other aspects of knee arthroscopy.Methods - The guideline was developed in accordance with the criteria of the AGREE instrument (AGREE II: Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II) with support of a professional methodologist from the Dutch Knowledge Institute of Medical Specialists. The scientific literature was searched and systematically analyzed. Conclusions and recommendations were formulated according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method. Recommendations were developed considering the balance of benefits and harms, the type and quality of evidence, the values and preferences of the people involved, and the costs.

Statistical validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) according to the COSMIN checklist.

BACKGROUND: The Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) is the only questionnaire available to assess quality of life in patients with isolated meniscal injuries. The aims of this study were to prepare the Persian version of the WOMET (PWOMET) and validate it in Iranian patients with isolated meniscal tears. METHODS: In the first stage, the English version of WOMET was translated into Persian. Content validity, and qualitative and quantitative (impact score) face validity were tested by specialists and in a sample of 30 patients. In the second stage, PWOMET was assessed for the evaluation of psychometric properties in 100 patients with isolated meniscal injury and 50 healthy people based on the COSMIN checklist. Construct validity was tested based on structural validity (factor analysis) and hypothesis testing. Correlation with the total scores on the SF-36, IKDC and KOOS were used for concurrent criterion validity. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach's alpha, respectively. In addition the standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change were calculated. Interpretability was investigated as the ceiling and floor effects and minimal important difference. RESULTS: The PWOMET had acceptable qualitative face validity and content validity. The impact score (quantitative face validity) was more than 1.5 for all items. For construct validity, structural validity (factor analysis) and hypothesis testing ability were confirmed. Correlations between the PWOMET total score and IKDC, SF-36, KOOS scores were 0.61, 0.54 and 0.63, respectively (p < 0.001), thus confirming concurrent criterion validity. The intraclass correlation coefficient, Cronbach's alpha, SEM and smallest detectable change for the PWOMET were 0.73, 0.89, 9.43 and 26.13, respectively. The PWOMET had no ceiling or floor effects, and minimal important difference was 9.07. CONCLUSION: The PWOMET provides valid and reliable scores for assessment of the quality of life in patients with isolated meniscal injury.

Arthroscopic side-to-side repair for complete radial posterior lateral meniscus root tears.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the radiographic, second-look, and functional outcomes after arthroscopic side-to-side repair for complete radial posterior lateral meniscus root tears (PLMRTs). METHODS: Patients who underwent arthroscopic side-to-side repair for complete radial PLMRTs were identified. Clinical assessment consisted of symptoms (locking, catching, giving way and effusion), examinations of joint-line tenderness and McMurray test, and subjective scores of International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and Tegner. In addition, postoperative MRI scan and second-look arthroscopy were performed to assess the healing status of the repaired meniscus. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 25.41 years. The mean follow-up period was 26.68 months. During the follow-up, none of the patients had symptoms of meniscal retear, lateral joint-line tenderness or a positive McMurray test. The postoperative subjective scores of IKDC, Lysholm, and Tegner improved significantly compared to the preoperative values (P = 0.01). Postoperative MRI scan showed that 28/29 (96.6%) patients achieved meniscus healing. Twenty-two patients underwent second-look arthroscopy, among whom 19 (86.4%) patients showed complete meniscus healing and 3 (13.6%) patients showed partial healing. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic side-to-side repair was a valuable surgical repair technique for complete radial PLMRTs, which leaded to significant improvements in both objective and subjective functional outcomes with a high rate of meniscus healing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

High rate of return-to-play following meniscal allograft transplantation.

PURPOSE: In recent years, meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) has been established as an effective option for young patients with symptomatic meniscus insufficiency with goals of functional improvement and joint preservation. Currently, there is little available information on return-to-play among patients in this cohort. The purpose of this study is to systematically review the literature and to evaluate the reported rehabilitation protocols, return-to-play guidelines, and subsequent rates of return-to-play following MAT. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to find studies on MAT. Studies were included if they reported return-to-play data or rehabilitation protocols. The rate and timing of return-to-play was assessed. The rehabilitation protocols were recorded, including time to start range of motion (ROM), full ROM, partial weight bearing (WB), and full WB. RESULTS: Overall, 67 studies met the inclusion criteria. Eleven studies, including 624 patients, reported 483 out of 624 patients (77.4%) returning to play, with 326 out of a reported 475 patients (68.6%) returning to the same/higher level, at a mean time to return of 9.0 months. There was significant variability in the reported rehabilitation protocols, but the most commonly reported time to begin ROM exercises was within the first week by 42 out of 60 studies (70.0%) and full ROM at 8 weeks by 18 out of 46 studies (39.1%). Partial weight bearing was most commonly begun in the fourth week by 20 out of 46 studies (43.5%), and for full WB the sixth week by 43 out of 65 studies (66.1%). Time elapsed following surgery was the most commonly reported criteria for return-to-play by 44 out of 48 studies (91.6%), with 6 months being the most common time point utilized by 17 out of 45 studies (37.8%). A small proportion of studies, 16 out of 48 (33.3%), advised against returning to competitive/collision sports altogether following MAT. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, there is a high rate of return-to-play following MAT, with the majority of patients returning to the same level of play. However, there is significant variability in reported rehabilitation protocols, and poor-quality reporting in return-to-play criteria in the literature indicates a need for further study and the development of an evidence-based consensus statement for this patient population. The results from this study can be used to better inform patients on their expected outcomes and provide a more informed consent process. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

A consensus-based process identifying physical therapy and exercise treatments for patients with degenerative meniscal tears and knee OA: the TeMPO physical therapy interventions and home exercise program.

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is prevalent and often associated with meniscal tear. Physical therapy (PT) and exercise regimens are often used to treat OA or meniscal tear, but, to date, few programs have been designed specifically for conservative treatment of meniscal tear with concomitant knee OA. Clinical care and research would be enhanced by a standardized, evidence-based, conservative treatment program and the ability to study the effects of the contextual factors associated with interventions for patients with painful, degenerative meniscal tears in the setting of OA. This paper describes the process of developing both a PT intervention and a home exercise program for a randomized controlled clinical trial that will compare the effectiveness of these interventions for patients with knee pain, meniscal tear and concomitant OA. METHODS: This paper describes the process utilized by an interdisciplinary team of physical therapists, physicians, and researchers to develop and refine a standardized in-clinic PT intervention, and a standardized home exercise program to be carried out without PT supervision. The process was guided in part by Medical Research Council guidance on intervention development. RESULTS: The investigators achieved agreement on an in-clinic PT intervention that included manual therapy, stretching, strengthening, and neuromuscular functional training addressing major impairments in range of motion, musculotendinous length, muscle strength and neuromotor control in the major muscle groups associated with improving knee function. The investigators additionally achieved agreement on a progressive, protocol-based home exercise program (HEP) that addressed the same major muscle groups. The HEP was designed to allow patients to perform and progress the exercises without PT supervision, utilizing minimal equipment and a variety of methods for instruction. DISCUSSION: This multi-faceted in-clinic PT program and standardized HEP provide templates for in-clinic and home-based care for patients with symptomatic degenerative meniscal tear and concomitant OA. These interventions will be tested as part of the Treatment of Meniscal Tear in Osteoarthritis (TeMPO) Trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The TeMPO Trial was first registered at clinicaltrials.gov with registration No. NCT03059004 on February 14, 2017. TeMPO was also approved by the Institutional Review Board at Partners HealthCare/Brigham and Women's Hospital.

Loosening of Transtibial Pullout Meniscal Root Repairs due to Simulated Rehabilitation Is Unrecoverable: A Biomechanical Study.

PURPOSE: To determine whether meniscal root repairs recover from displacement due to rehabilitative loading. METHODS: Transtibial pullout repairs of the posteromedial meniscal root were performed in 16 cadaveric ovine knees. Single- and double-tunnel repairs using the 2-simple suture technique were cyclically loaded in tension to 10,000 cycles, allowed to rest, and loaded in tension again. Paired differences in displacement with rest were recorded to evaluate recoverability. Displacement of repairs at cycles of interest was recorded, and the response of repairs to 10,000 cycles was assessed. RESULTS: All outcomes were not significantly different between the single- and double-tunnel techniques; therefore, the results were pooled. The difference in displacement between the first cycle and the first cycle after rest was 1.59 ± 0.69 mm. Repair displacement did not reach an equilibrium within 10,000 cycles and instead resulted in a steady increase in displacement of 0.05 ± 0.02 mm per additional 1,000 cycles. Sutures macroscopically began to cut out of the meniscus in both single- and double-tunnel repairs. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that significant, unrecoverable loosening from rehabilitative loading occurred in single- and double-tunnel meniscal root repairs. Root repairs also gradually displaced with continued loading instead of reaching an equilibrium displacement after 10,000 cycles. This progressive, unrecoverable loosening needs to be studied further to better understand the resultant impact on knee mechanics. In addition, the quality and quantity of meniscal root repair healing at the time of rehabilitation should be studied to determine how susceptible patients are to repair loosening. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Rehabilitative loading caused unrecoverable and progressive loosening of root repairs, showing the importance of healing before loading. Investigations on the effects of loosening on mechanics and the quality of repair healing at weight bearing are necessary to better understand the clinical implications.

High short-term return to sports rate despite an ongoing healing process after acute meniscus repair in young athletes.

PURPOSE: Acute meniscus repair in young athletes is always a challenge due to the long rehabilitation process and time to return to sport (RTS). The purpose was to investigate signal alterations in short-term follow-up after acute meniscus repair on specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan sequences. It was hypothesized that (1) MRI signal changes over the first postoperative healing phase and represent a continuous healing process and (2) meniscus healing properties correlates with clinical outcomes and RTS. METHODS: Young athletes with traumatic meniscus lesion and arthroscopic meniscus repair within 6 weeks and available preoperative MRI were enrolled. Clinical examination, outcome scores (IKDC, KOOS, Lysholm Score, Tegner activity score) and RTS were surveyed preoperatively and 6 and 12 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Radiological follow-up examinations were performed 2, 4, 6, 12 weeks and 6 months after operation using a 3T-MRI. Evaluation was based on ISAKOS meniscus classification system, meniscus healing were classified according to Henning's criteria. RESULTS: At final follow-up (FU) 30 patients (28 month, 2 week) with a total of 35 meniscus tears (19 medial, 16 lateral) were included. Clinical scores improved significantly after surgery: IKDC Score (preOP: 39.4 ± 18.5, final FU: 78.8 ± 15.3) KOOS (preOP: 45.7 ± 22.1, final FU: 82.7 ± 12.5) and Lysholm Score (preOP: 42.8 ± 23.7, final FU: 84.4 ± 13.8) (p < 0.01). Tegner activity score showed a steadily increase to 4 (range 3-9) at 6 months but did not reached the pre-injury level of 6 (range 3-9). RTS rate was 100% whereof 44.8% reached their pre-injury level. MRI examination revealed a continuous healing process and menisci were classified as 55.9% healed, 35.3% partially healed and 8.8% non-healed at final FU. CONCLUSION: This study showed that MRI signal alterations of the meniscus steadily occur within the first 6 months postoperatively. MRI reveals an ongoing healing process at final FU that have to be carefully considered when RTS is discussed with high demanding patients. However, young athletes provide good clinical results and RTS rate even though MRI alterations are still present. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, prospective case series, Level IV.

Current concepts in the techniques, indications and outcomes of meniscal repairs.

Knee arthroscopy for meniscal tears is one of the most commonly performed orthopaedic procedures. In recent years, there has been an increasing incidence of meniscal repairs, as there are concerns that meniscectomy predisposes patients to early osteoarthritis. Indications for meniscal repair are increasing and can now be performed in older patients who are active, even if the tear is in the avascular zone. Options for meniscal tear management broadly fall into three categories: non-operative management, meniscal repair or meniscectomy. With limited evidence directly comparing each of these options optimal management strategies can be difficult. Decision making requires thorough assessment of patient factors (e.g. age and comorbidities) and tear characteristics (e.g. location and reducibility). The purpose of this paper is, therefore, to review the management options of meniscal tears and summarize the evidence for meniscal tear repair.

A novel suture technique to reduce the meniscus extrusion in the pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears.

The medial meniscus (MM) posterior root has important functions in preventing an excessive loading stress during knee motion and degeneration of the articular cartilage. Although the transtibial pullout repair has become the gold standard for MM posterior root tears (MMPRTs), MM extrusion remains. In addition, during knee extension to deep flexion, the MM posterior segment in the MMPRT knee has been shown to translate toward the posteromedial direction, causing a notable MM posterior extrusion. Thus, the reduction in the MM posteromedial extrusion is one of the important postoperative outcomes to restore the meniscal function and eventually prevent the progression of knee osteoarthritis. The present technical note describes an arthroscopic technique addition to the pullout repair, in which an all-inside suture is inserted into the posteromedial part of the MM to reduce the MM posteromedial extrusion.

Meniscus repairs can be saved in the event of postoperative septic arthritis.

PURPOSE: No systematic studies on optimal treatment of postoperative septic arthritis following arthroscopic meniscus repair are available. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the fate of repaired menisci in cases of postoperative septic arthritis, with treatment for infection focused on arthroscopic irrigation and debridement (I&D) and intention to maintain the meniscus. METHODS: Data of two sports orthopedics centers of the last 10 years were pooled (approximately 25,000 arthroscopic procedures of the knee). All cases of septic arthritis following arthroscopic meniscus repair were identified. These cases were retrospectively evaluated with regard to clinical course and management, especially the number of necessary I&Ds, if eradication was achieved, and if the repaired meniscus was retained or a partial resection was necessary ('early failure'). Patients with initially maintained meniscus repairs were contacted if further meniscus surgery was performed in further follow-up ('late failure'). RESULTS: 20 patients with 23 repaired menisci were included. In 65% (13 cases), a concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed. A mean of 2.0 ± 1.0 (1-4) arthroscopic I&Ds were performed in the treatment of septic arthritis. In two cases, additional open surgery was performed (after outside-in sutures). Eradication was achieved in all cases. Four repaired menisci (17.4%) showed loosened fixation or substantial degradation and were consequently partially resected within treatment for septic arthritis (early failures). The follow-up rate for the 19 initially maintained menisci was 94.7% after 3.0 ± 2.2 years (median 2.8, 0.4-7.8). Three of these underwent further partial resection (13.0%). Cumulative 3-year survival rate (Kaplan-Meier method) of all repairs was 70.7% (95% CI 50.3-91.1%), and for the subgroup of initially maintained menisci 85.6% (95% CI 67.0-100.0%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Septic arthritis following meniscus repair can be successfully treated with (sequential) arthroscopic I&Ds. There is a considerable rate of early failures, however, in a mid-term follow-up the failure rate of initially retained menisci is low and comparable to what we know from the literature for cases without infection. Therefore, it is generally recommended to try to save the repaired menisci in these cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, therapeutic case series.

Meniscal repair results in inferior short-term outcomes compared with meniscal resection: a cohort study of 6398 patients with primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To compare patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) during the first postoperative year between isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and ACL reconstruction with concomitant meniscal intervention. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction at Capio Artro Clinic, Stockholm, Sweden, between 1st Jan 2001 and 31st Dec 2014 without concomitant injuries others than meniscal and/or cartilage lesions were included. Five groups of meniscal treatment simultaneously to ACL reconstruction were established; medial meniscal (MM) resection, MM repair, lateral meniscal (LM) resection, LM repair, and MM + LM resection. Patients treated with isolated ACL reconstruction formed a separate group. Preoperative, 6-month and 1-year Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Lysholm knee score and Tegner Activity scale were collected. Differences in the change over time were analyzed with an ANOVA for repeated measurements with age at surgery, gender, and cartilage injury as covariates. A univariate ANOVA was applied to analyze PROMs between groups at the final follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 6398 patients were included (56.8% males, mean age 28.5 ± 10.2 years). The KOOS improved across all subscales for all treatment groups. The mean change over time differed significantly between groups for the subscales symptoms (p = 0.017) and activities in daily living (ADL) (p < 0.001). Symptoms was least improved in the MM repair group, while the MM + LM resection group showed the largest improvement. For the ADL subscale, the isolated ACL reconstruction group showed the least improvement and the MM + LM resection group showed the major improvement. At 1-year follow-up, a significant difference between the groups was found for the subscale symptoms (p = 0.019), where the MM repair group reported the lowest score [mean 78.4 (95% CI 76.3-80.5)]. No significant differences were found between groups in change of the Lysholm score over time; however, at 6 months, the difference between groups was significant (p = 0.006) with the meniscal repair groups reporting the lowest scores. CONCLUSION: Patients with concomitant meniscal resection are able to reach the same subjective knee function as isolated ACL reconstructions as early as 6 months postoperatively. However, patients with meniscal repair may have slightly worse subjective knee function at both 6- and 12-month follow-up. These findings could help clinicians to set realistic short-term expectations for patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with simultaneous meniscal intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Meniscus repair with simultaneous ACL reconstruction demonstrated similar clinical outcomes as isolated ACL repair: a result not seen with meniscus resection.

PURPOSE: To compare Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) subscale scores at 2-year follow-up for patients with primary isolated ACL reconstruction with patients undergoing ACL reconstruction and simultaneous meniscal treatment in terms of either resection or repair in the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register (SNKLR). METHODS: All ACL reconstruction patients within the SNKLR at 2-year follow-up were reviewed. The KOOS and EQ-5D subscales were assessed in four distinct patient groups: isolated ACL reconstruction, ACL reconstruction + medial meniscus resection, ACL reconstruction + lateral meniscus resection, ACL reconstruction + medial meniscus repair, and ACL reconstruction + lateral meniscus repair. The primary analysis was conducted using linear regression with isolated ACL reconstruction designated as the reference group, and was adjusted for patient age, gender, and time from injury to surgery. RESULTS: The included patients consisted of 10,001 (65.0%) individuals with an isolated ACL injury, 588 (3.8%) with ACL injury plus treated with medial meniscus repair, 2307 (15.0%) with ACL injury plus treated with medial meniscus resection, 323 (2.1%) with ACL injury plus treated with lateral meniscus repair, and 2173 (14.1%) with ACL injury plus treated with lateral meniscus resection. Meniscus resection demonstrated significantly worse results with respect to the KOOS Symptoms subscale for both the medial and lateral meniscus resection groups. Medial meniscus resection also demonstrated worse results for the KOOS quality of life (QoL) subscale, while lateral meniscus resection only approached significance. Outcomes were not different between the isolated ACL reconstruction group and the meniscus repair groups. CONCLUSION: Meniscus resection in addition to ACL reconstruction resulted in worse clinical outcomes than isolated ACL reconstruction patients; a result not seen within the meniscus repair group. This suggests that, when possible, meniscus repair may provide greater clinical outcomes over resection when treating a reparable meniscal tear that presents along with an ACL tear. Clinicians should consider and implement these findings for the management of future meniscus tear patients within their clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Successful anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and meniscal repair in osteogenesis imperfecta.

A case of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with meniscal repair in an osteogenesis imperfecta patient is reported. A 24-year-old female with osteogenesis imperfecta type 1a suffered from a valgus extension injury resulting in tear of ACL and medial meniscus. She underwent an arthroscopic-assisted ACL reconstruction and medial meniscus repair. Meniscal tear at the menisco-capsular junction of the posterior horn of medial meniscus was repaired with three absorbable sutures via inside-out technique. ACL reconstruction was then performed with a bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft. The patient was followed up for 1 year with intact ACL grafts and healed medial meniscus. This case report showed that successful ACL reconstruction and meniscal repair is possible in an osteogenesis imperfecta patient.Level of evidence V.

Effect of Early Surgery vs Physical Therapy on Knee Function Among Patients With Nonobstructive Meniscal Tears: The ESCAPE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Despite recent studies suggesting arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) is not more effective than physical therapy (PT), the procedure is still frequently performed in patients with meniscal tears. Objective: To assess whether PT is noninferior to APM for improving patient-reported knee function in patients with meniscal tears. Design, Setting, and Participants: Noninferiority, multicenter, randomized clinical trial conducted in 9 hospitals in the Netherlands. Participants were aged 45 to 70 years with nonobstructive meniscal tears (ie, no locking of the knee joint). Patients with knee instability, severe osteoarthritis, and body mass index greater than 35 were excluded. Recruitment took place between July 17, 2013, and November 4, 2015. Participants were followed up for 24 months (final participant follow-up, October 11, 2017). Interventions: Three hundred twenty-one participants were randomly assigned to APM (n = 159) or a predefined PT protocol (n = 162). The PT protocol consisted of 16 sessions of exercise therapy over 8 weeks focused on coordination and closed kinetic chain strength exercises. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in patient-reported knee function on the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (range, 0 to 100; from worse to best) from baseline over a 24-month follow-up period. The noninferiority margin was defined as a difference between treatment groups of 8 points and was assessed with a 1-sided α of .025. The primary analysis followed the intention-to-treat principle. Results: Among 321 patients who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 58 [6.6] years; 161 women [50%]), 289 (90%) completed the trial (161 women and 158 men). In the PT group, 47 participants (29%) had APM during the 24-month follow-up period, and 8 participants randomized to APM (5%) did not have APM. Over a 24-month follow-up period, knee function improved in the APM group by 26.2 points (from 44.8 to 71.5) and in the PT group by 20.4 points (from 46.5 to 67.7). The overall between-group difference was 3.6 points (97.5% CI, -∞ to 6.5; P value for noninferiority = .001). Adverse events occurred in 18 participants in the APM group and 12 in the PT group. Repeat surgery (3 in the APM group and 1 in the PT group) and additional outpatient visits for knee pain (6 in the APM group and 2 in the PT group) were the most frequent adverse events. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with nonobstructive meniscal tears, PT was noninferior to APM for improving patient-reported knee function over a 24-month follow-up period. Based on these results, PT may be considered an alternative to surgery for patients with nonobstructive meniscal tears. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01850719.

Arthroscopic direct meniscal extrusion reduction: surgical tips to reduce persistent meniscal extrusion in meniscal root repair.

Meniscal extrusion (ME) is defined as extension of the meniscal margin by at least 3 mm beyond the tibial margin. The main purpose of meniscal root repair is to restore the anatomy and function of the meniscus. Therefore, the reduction in the ME is one of the important objective outcomes. Nevertheless, the reduced meniscal extrusion was obtained in limited patients after meniscal root repair. This technical note described the arthroscopic direct meniscal extrusion reduction as surgical tips to reduce persistent meniscal extrusion in posterior meniscal root repair.

Does Release of the Superficial Medial Collateral Ligament Result in Clinically Harmful Effects After the Fixation of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears?

PURPOSE: To investigate pain and tenderness, stress testing, clinical outcome scores, complications, and operation time at 24 months and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis at 12 months after the release of the distal attachment of the superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) during medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) fixation. METHODS: Patients who received MMPRT fixation with a follow-up of at least 2 years were included. During fixation, the release of the distal attachment of the sMCL on the proximal tibia was performed to improve visualization and provide sufficient working space. Pain and tenderness at the released area, manual valgus stress tests of 30° and 0° flexion (grade 0/1/2/3), and subjective instability during weight bearing were evaluated serially at postoperative 3, 6, 12, and 24+ months. The contour of detachment area was assessed using MRI 12 months postoperatively. As a subgroup analysis, tourniquet time (minutes) and final clinical scores were compared between release and nonrelease groups. RESULTS: The numbers of participants in the release and nonrelease groups were 118 and 20 patients, and their mean follow-up durations were 42.4 ± 19.3 (24-95) and 37.2 ± 7.8 (30-55) months, respectively. In the release group, percentages of patients with pain and tenderness at 3 months were 15% and 18%, respectively; however, no patients had symptoms at 12 months. In valgus stress tests (30°, 0°), 12% and 2% of patients showed grade 1 laxity at 3 months, and 7% had grade 1 laxity in only 30° flexion at the final follow-up. However, no patients had subjective valgus laxity. An intact contour was confirmed in all cases among 94 patients checked by performing follow-up MRI. Tourniquet time was significantly shorter in the release group (42.4 ± 19.3) than in the nonrelease group (58.5 ± 9.5; P < .001). Between release and nonrelease groups, Lysholm (84.4 ± 12.1, 88.1 ± 12.8; P = .117) and International Knee Documentation Committee scores (73.6 ± 11.2, 77.5 ± 11.9; P = .112) did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: The release of the distal attachment of the sMCL during fixation of MMPRT did not result in pain and tenderness, residual instability, and complication. An intact contour of the sMCL was confirmed in all cases with MRI. This procedure reduced operation time and showed similar clinical results when compared between the release and nonrelease groups. However, this study had low power to detect the difference for clinical scores between the 2 groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Predictors of Exercise Adherence in Patients With Meniscal Tear and Osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of poor exercise adherence in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and meniscal tear. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data gathered over the first 12 weeks in the Meniscal Tear in Osteoarthritis Research (MeTeOR) trial, a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Seven referral centers. PARTICIPANTS: Most of the patients in the MeTeOR trial (N=325 of 351) were included in the analysis, each of whom was aged ≥45 years and had a meniscal tear and osteoarthritic changes on imaging studies; 26 were excluded because of missing data from which to derive the primary outcome variable. INTERVENTIONS: All patients received a structured, supervised exercise program focused on strengthening, along with prescribed home exercises; half were randomly assigned to also receive arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Poor exercise adherence through 12 weeks, defined as performing <50% of prescribed exercise. RESULTS: Thirty-eight percent of the MeTeOR cohort showed poor exercise adherence. In the multivariate model, adjusting for treatment group, those who earned ≤$29,000 per year had 1.64 times the risk of nonadherence (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-2.43) than those who earned >$100,000 per year; and those without baseline pain with pivoting and twisting had 1.60 times greater risk of nonadherence than those with these symptoms (95% CI, 1.14-2.25). CONCLUSIONS: Low income was associated with poor exercise adherence among patients aged ≥45 years with OA and a meniscal tear, as was absence of pain with pivoting and twisting. Our findings highlight the need for further research into exercise adherence and for interventions to enhance adherence among those with low incomes.

Meniscal Transplant surgery or Optimised Rehabilitation full randomised trial (MeTeOR2): a study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Pain and disability after meniscectomy can be a substantial lifelong problem. There are few treatment options, especially for young people. Non-surgical management (rehabilitation) is an option but increasingly surgeons are performing meniscal allograft transplants (MATs) for these individuals. However, this is still an uncommon procedure, and availability and usage of MAT vary widely both in the UK and internationally. It is not known which treatment option is the most effective and cost-effective. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Meniscal Transplant surgery or Optimised Rehabilitation trial is an international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. The aim is to compare the clinical and cost effectiveness of MAT versus an optimised package of individualised, progressive, rehabilitation that we have called personalised knee therapy (PKT).Participants will be recruited from sites across the UK, Australia, Canada and Belgium. The planned 144 participants provide at least 90% power to detect a 10-point difference in the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS4) at 24-months post randomisation (primary outcome). A prospectively planned economic evaluation will be conducted from a healthcare system and personal social services perspective. Secondary outcome data including health utility, occupational status, sports participation, mental well-being, further treatment, and adverse events will be collected at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Analysis will be on an intention-to-treat basis and reported in-line with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial was approved by the London-Bloomsbury Research Ethics Committee on 19 August 2022 (22/LO/0327) and Northern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee, NSW, Australia on the 13 March 2023 (2022/ETH01890).Trial results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, presentations at international conferences, in lay summaries and using social media as appropriate.This protocol adheres to the recommended Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) checklist. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN87336549.

Early Surgery Versus Exercise Therapy and Patient Education for Traumatic and Nontraumatic Meniscal Tears in Young Adults-An Exploratory Analysis From the DREAM Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of early meniscal surgery versus exercise and education with the option of later surgery on pain, function, and quality of life in young patients with a meniscal tear, taking symptom onset into account. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial (the "Danish RCT on Exercise versus Arthroscopic Meniscal surgery for young adults" [DREAM] trial), 121 patients aged 18-40 years with a magnetic resonance imaging-verified meniscal tear were randomized to surgery or 12 weeks of supervised exercise and patient education. For this exploratory study, the analyses were stratified by symptom onset (traumatic/nontraumatic). The main outcome was the difference in change after 12 months in the mean score of 4 Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales (KOOS4) covering pain, symptoms, function in sport and recreation, and quality of life. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (69%) in the exercise therapy group and 47 (78%) in the surgery group were categorized as having a traumatic tear. We observed no difference in change in the KOOS4 after 12 months between the 2 treatment groups for either traumatic tears (18.8 versus 16.0 in the surgery versus exercise therapy groups; adjusted mean difference, 4.8 [95% confidence interval, -1.7 to 11.2]) or nontraumatic tears (20.6 versus 17.3 in the surgery versus exercise therapy groups; adjusted mean difference, 7.0 [95% confidence interval, -3.7 to 17.7]). CONCLUSION: In patients with traumatic and nontraumatic meniscus tears, early meniscal surgery did not appear superior to exercise and education in improving pain, function, and quality of life after 12 months. Further research is needed to confirm the clinical applicability of these findings. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(5):1-10. Epub 22 February 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12245.