Medial Collateral Ligament Pie-Crusting for Isolated Medial Meniscal Root Repair Is Associated With Improved Clinical Outcomes with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: To determine clinical and radiographic outcomes of medial collateral ligament (MCL) pie-crusting during isolated medial meniscal root repair. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted between August 2013 and December 2019 in patients undergoing isolated medial meniscal root repair. Outcomes, including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, re-tears, MCL laxity, and conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA), were compared between pie crust (PC) and non-pie crust (NPC) cohorts. Other assessments included subjective instability or stiffness, infection, and intra-operative chondromalacia. Additionally, radiographic outcomes were compared to determine progression of medial compartment arthrosis. RESULTS: Final analysis included 97 knees, 45 in the PC, and 52 in the NPC group. IKDC and Lysholm scores were similar between both groups preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. However, at the 6,12, and 24-month follow up, the PC group had a significantly higher measured IKDC and Lysholm scores than the NPC group. PASS percentages for the IKDC score were significantly higher in the PC group at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years (96.2%; P = .02) follow-up compared to the NPC group. MCID percentages for the IKDC score were also significantly higher at the 1- and 2-year (100%; P = .05) follow-up in the PC group compared to the NPC group. There was also a significantly higher rate of recurrent medial meniscal root tears in the NPC group (4 [8.9%]) compared to the PC group (0 [P = .03]). No MCL laxity was observed at 6 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: MCL pie-crusting during isolated medial meniscal root repair can be used as an alternative surgical technique, as it leads to improved clinical and patient outcomes compared to patients who do not undergo MCL pie-crusting in the short term. Additionally, those that underwent MCL pie-crusting had a lower incidence of recurrent tears, and no patients experienced MCL laxity at 6 months. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort/comparative study.

Alignment is only part of the equation: High variability in soft tissue distractibility in the varus knee undergoing primary TKA.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the in vivo medial and lateral joint laxities across various total knee arthroplasty (TKA) alignment categories correlated to (1) hip-knee-ankle angle, (2) proximal tibial angle and (3) distal femoral angle in a consecutive group of patients undergoing robotic-assisted TKA. METHODS: Using ligament tensions acquired during 805 robotic-assisted TKA with a dynamic ligament tensor under a load of 70-90 N, the relationship between medial and lateral collateral ligament laxity and overall limb alignment was established. Only knees with neutral or mechanical varus alignment were included and divided into five groups: neutral (0°-3°), varus 3°-5°, varus 6°-9°, varus 10°-13° and varus ≥14°. Groups were further subdivided by the intraoperative medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA). The distraction of the medial and lateral sides was compared across the various alignments using an analysis of variance. RESULTS: The ability to distract the medial collateral ligament in extension and flexion was proportional to the degree of varus deformity, increasing from 4.0 ± 2.3 mm in the neutral group to 8.7 ± 3.2 mm in the varus ≥14° group (p < 0.0001). On the lateral side, the distraction of the lateral collateral ligament decreased in both extension (2.2 ± 2.4 vs. 1.2 ± 2.7, p < 0.0001) and flexion (2.8 ± 2.8 to 1.7 ± 3.0, p < 0.0001) with increasing native varus deformity. MPTA and LDFA had similar effects, where increasing MPTA varus and LDFA valgus increased medial distractibility in extension and flexion. There was significant variability of the stretch of the ligaments within and across all alignment categories, in which the standard deviation of the groups ranged from 2.0 to 3.0 mm. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates increased medial ligament distractibility with increasing varus deformity. However, there was significant variability in ligamentous laxity within various limb alignment categories suggesting the anatomy and soft tissue identity of the knee is complex and highly variable. TKAs seeking to be more anatomic will not only need to restore alignment but also native soft tissue tensions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic.

Treating Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Medial Collateral Ligament Injuries Operatively in the Acute Setting Is Potentially Advantageous.

Combined injury of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and medial collateral ligament (MCL) remains among the most common knee injury patterns in orthopaedics. Optimal treatment of grade III MCL injuries is still debated, especially when combined with ACL injury. Most patients with these severe injuries are treated conservatively for at least 6 weeks to allow for MCL healing, followed by delayed ACL reconstruction. Although acute treatment of the MCL was common in the 1970s, postoperative stiffness was frequently reported. Moreover, studies of such treatment failed to show clinical benefits of surgical over conservative treatment, and the MCL exhibited intrinsic healing capacity, leading to the consensus that all MCL injuries are treated conservatively. The current delayed treatment algorithm for ACL-MCL injuries has several disadvantages. First, MCL healing may be incomplete, resulting in residual valgus laxity that places the ACL graft at greater risk of failure. Second, delayed treatment lengthens the overall rehabilitation period, thereby prolonging the presence of atrophy and delaying return to preinjury activity levels. Third, the initial healing period leaves the knee unstable for longer and risks further intra-articular damage. Acute simultaneous surgical treatment of both ligaments has the potential to avoid these shortcomings. This article will review the evolution of treatment of ACL-MCL injuries and explain how it shifted toward the current treatment algorithm. We will (1) discuss why the consensus shifted, (2) discuss the shortcomings of the current treatment plan, (3) discuss the potential advantages of acute simultaneous treatment, and (4) present an overview of the available literature.

Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction and Repair Show Similar Improvement in Outcome Scores, But Repair Shows Higher Rates of Knee Stiffness and Failure: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To compare patient-reported outcomes and complications in patients with medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries undergoing repair versus reconstruction with a minimum 2-year follow-up. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Scopus, and Embase-computerized databases from database inception to November 2022, according to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies evaluating clinical outcomes and complications at a minimum of 2 years following MCL repair versus reconstruction were included. Study quality was assessed using the MINORS criteria. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies published from 1997 to 2022, consisting of 503 patients were identified. Twelve studies (n = 308 patients; mean age: 32.6 years) reported outcomes following MCL reconstruction, and 8 studies (n = 195 patients; mean age: 28.5 years) reported results following MCL repair. Postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm, and Tegner scores ranged from 67.6 to 91, 75.8 to 94.8, and 4.4 to 8, respectively, in the MCL reconstruction group, compared to 73 to 91, 75.1 to 98.5, and 5.2 to 10, respectively, in the MCL repair group. Knee stiffness was the most commonly reported complication following MCL repair (range: 0% - 50%) and reconstruction (range: 0% - 26.7%). Failures occurred in 0% to 14.6% of patients following reconstruction versus 0% to 35.1% of patients undergoing MCL repair. Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) for postoperative arthrofibrosis (range: 0% - 12.2%) and surgical debridement for arthrofibrosis (range: 0% - 20%) were the most commonly reported reoperations in the MCL reconstruction and repair groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MCL reconstruction versus repair both demonstrate improved International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm, and Tegner scores. MCL repair demonstrates higher rates of postoperative knee stiffness and failure at a minimum 2-year follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.

MCL internal brace does not fully recapitulate normal MCL function in valgus stress.

PURPOSE: The null hypothesis is that there would be no difference in medial gapping under valgus load between the intact MCL and the ruptured MCL with an internal brace in place. METHODS: Eight pairs of cadaver knees were used (16 knees). Alternating sides, one knee from each pair was used for one of two "internal brace" constructs. The constructs involved different methods of fixation for securing FiberTape (Arthrex, Naples, FL) to both the femur and tibia in an effort to brace the MCL. The knees were then subjected to valgus stress by applying 10 N m of torque with the knee at 20 degrees of flexion. The amount of medial joint space opening was measured on radiographs. The stress testing was conducted with three MCL states: intact, grade 2 tear, and grade 3 tear. RESULTS: In the Construct I specimens, gapping increased from 0.7 mm with the MCL intact to 1.1 mm with grade 2 tearing (p < 0.01), and to 1.3 mm with grade 3 tearing (p < 0.01). In the Construct II specimens, gapping increased from 0.7 mm with the MCL intact to 1.0 mm with grade 2 tearing (p < 0.01), and to 1.1 mm with grade 3 tearing (n.s.). Construct I specimens failed primarily at the femoral attachment. All Construct II specimens survived the valgus stress testing. CONCLUSION: Construct I did not maintain tension. Construct II did maintain tension during application of valgus load, but did not restore valgus opening to the intact state. It is important for clinicians who are considering using this commercially available technique to be aware of how the construct performs under valgus stress testing compared to the intact MCL.

Bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty procedure reduced tensile force in the middle and posterior components of lateral collateral ligament during deep knee flexion activities with no effect on tensile force of the medial collateral ligament.

PURPOSE: To analyse the effects of bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (BCR-TKA) on the tensile force of the collateral ligaments during two deep knee flexion activities, cross-leg sitting and squatting. METHODS: Thirteen patients (15 knees) treated using bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (BCR-TKA) for knee joint osteoarthritis were analysed. Knee joint kinematics during cross-leg sitting (open-chain flexion) and squatting (closed-chain flexion) were evaluated through fluoroscopy. The tensile force was calculated in vivo based on the change in the distance between the femoral and tibial attachment areas for the anterior, middle, and posterior components of the superficial (sMCL) and deep (dMCL) medial collateral ligament and the lateral collateral ligament (LCL). Differences in the calculated tensile forces of the collateral ligaments were evaluated using repeated measures of analysis of variance, with post hoc pairwise comparison (Bonferroni test). Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: The correction of the coronal alignment was related to the surgical technique, not to the implant design. No significant change in the tensile force in all three components of the sMCL from pre- to post-TKA (n.s.) was observed. For dMCL, a pre- to post-TKA change in the tensile force was observed only for the anterior dMCL component (p = 0.03). No change was observed in the tensile force of the anterior LCL with increasing flexion, with no difference in pre- to post-TKA and between activities (n.s.). In contrast, tensile force in the middle LCL slightly decreased with increasing flexion during squatting, pre- and post-TKA. After surgery, lower forces were generated at 40° of flexion (p = 0.04). Tensile force in the posterior LCL was higher in extension than flexion, which remained high in the extension post-TKA. However, after surgery, lower tensile forces were generated at 10° (p = 0.04) and 40° (p = 0.04) of flexion. CONCLUSIONS: The in vivo change in tensile forces of the collateral ligaments of the knee before and after BCR-TKA can inform the development of appropriate ligament balancing strategies to facilitate recovery of deep knee flexion activities after TKA, as well as for continued improvement of BCR-TKA designs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Medial Varus Proximal Tibial Resection is Superior to Pie-Crusting of the Medial Collateral Ligament During Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Medial varus proximal tibial (MPT) resection or soft tissue releases (STRs) of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) in the form of pie-crusting can be performed to achieve a balanced knee in a varus deformity. Studies comparing the 2 modalities have not been addressed within the literature. Therefore, the aims of this study were to assess the following: (1) compartmental changes between the 2 methods and (2) changes in patient-reported outcome measurements. METHODS: Using our institution's total joint arthroplasty registry, patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019, were identified. The MPT resection and STR patients were 1:1 matched with baseline parameters yielding 196 patients. Outcomes of interest included: changes in compartmental pressures at 10, 45, and 90° degrees and change to the Short-Form 12, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and Forgotten Joint Scores (FJSs) at the 2-year follow-up period. A P value less than .05 was used as our threshold for statistical difference. RESULTS: The MPT resection led to significant reductions in compartmental pressures at 10° [43 versus 19 pounds (lbs.), P < .0001], 45° (43 versus 27 lbs., P < .0001), and 90° degrees (27 versus 16 lbs., P < .0001) compared to STR. MPT resection also had significantly improved Short-Form 12 (47 versus 38, P < .0001), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (9 versus 21, P < .0001), and Forgotten Joint Score (79 versus 68, P = .005). CONCLUSION: Bone modification was superior to pie-crusting of the MCL in achieving consistent pressure balancing and improved outcomes. The investigation can guide surgeons on the preferred method to achieve a well-balanced knee.

Chronic Medial Collateral Ligament Sprain Treated With Percutaneous Ultrasonic Debridement: A Case Report.

ABSTRACT: The medial collateral ligament (MCL) is the most commonly injured ligament of the knee. Most grade I and II injuries respond to conservative management, but symptoms persist in some patients. In these cases, treatment options are limited. Percutaneous ultrasonic debridement is increasingly being used for tendinopathy and fasciopathy refractory to conservative management, but this has not been reported as a treatment for ligament injury. Here, we present a case of a chronic grade II MCL sprain successfully treated with percutaneous ultrasonic debridement.

Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty restores more native medial collateral ligament strain than mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA TKA) targets restoration of patient-specific alignment and soft tissue laxity. However, whether KA TKA reproduces native soft tissue strain remains unclear. This cadaveric study tested the hypothesis that KA TKA would better restore the quantitative strain and strain distribution of medial collateral ligament (MCL) to the native healthy knee compared to mechanically aligned (MA) TKA. METHODS: Twenty-four fresh-frozen cadaver knees (12 pairs) were mounted on a customized knee squatting simulator to measure MCL strain during flexion. For each pair, one knee was assigned to KA TKA and the other to MA TKA. During KA TKA, the amount of femur and tibia resected was equivalent to implant thickness without MCL release using the calipered measuring technique. MA TKA was performed using conventional measured resection techniques. MCL strain was measured using a video extensometer (Mercury® RT RealTime tracking system, Sobriety s.r.o, Czech Republic). MCL strain and strain distribution during knee flexion were measured, and the measurements compared between native and post-TKA conditions. RESULTS: Mean and peak MCL strain were similar between KA TKA and native knees at all flexion angles (p > 0.1 at all flexion angles) while mean strain at all flexion angles and peak strain at ≥ 60º of MA TKA were approximately twice those of the native knees (p < 0.05 at ≥ 60º of flexion). In addition, greater MCL strain was observed in 4 of 12 regions of interest (ROI) after MA TKA (M1, M2, P1 and P2) compared to the native knee, whereas after KA TKA, MCL strain measurements were similar at all but 1 ROI (P2). CONCLUSIONS: KA TKA restored a more native amount and distribution of MCL strain compared to MA TKA. These findings provide clues for understanding why patients may experience better performance and more normal knee sensations after KA TKA compared to MA TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level I.

High incidence of superficial and deep medial collateral ligament injuries in 'isolated' anterior cruciate ligament ruptures: a long overlooked injury.

PURPOSE: In anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, concomitant damage to peripheral soft tissues is associated with increased rotatory instability of the knee. The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence and patterns of medial collateral ligament complex injuries in patients with clinically 'isolated' ACL ruptures. METHODS: Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction for complete 'presumed isolated' ACL rupture between 2015 and 2019 were retrospectively included in this study. Patient's characteristics and intraoperative findings were retrieved from clinical and surgical documentation. Preoperative MRIs were evaluated and the grade and location of injuries to the superficial MCL (sMCL), dMCL and the posterior oblique ligament (POL) recorded. All patients were clinically assessed under anaesthesia with standard ligament laxity tests. RESULTS: Hundred patients with a mean age of 22.3 ± 4.9 years were included. The incidence of concomitant MCL complex injuries was 67%. sMCL injuries occurred in 62%, dMCL in 31% and POL in 11% with various injury patterns. A dMCL injury was significantly associated with MRI grade II sMCL injuries, medial meniscus 'ramp' lesions seen at surgery and bone oedema at the medial femoral condyle (MFC) adjacent to the dMCL attachment site (p < 0.01). Logistic regression analysis identified younger age (OR 1.2, p < 0.05), simultaneous sMCL injury (OR 6.75, p < 0.01) and the presence of bone oedema at the MFC adjacent to the dMCL attachment site (OR 5.54, p < 0.01) as predictive factors for a dMCL injury. CONCLUSION: The incidence of combined ACL and medial ligament complex injuries is high. Lesions of the dMCL were associated with ramp lesions, MFC bone oedema close to the dMCL attachment, and sMCL injury. Missed AMRI is a risk factor for ACL graft failure from overload and, hence, oedema in the MCL (especially dMCL) demands careful assessment for AMRI, even in the knee lacking excess valgus laxity. This study provides information about specific MCL injury patterns including the dMCL in ACL ruptures and will allow surgeons to initiate individualised treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Imaging of the medial collateral ligament of the knee: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: The primary aim of this investigation was to systematically review relevant literature of various imaging modalities (magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), stress radiography and ultrasonography) in the assessment of patients with a medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature review of articles indexed in PubMed and Cochrane library was performed. Original research reporting data associated with medial gapping, surgical, and clinical findings associated with MCL injuries were considered for inclusion. The methodological quality of each inclusion was also assessed using a verified tool. RESULTS: Twenty-three imaging studies (magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) n = 14; ultrasonography n = 6; radiography n = 3) were ultimately included into the review. A total of 808 injured, and 294 control, knees were assessed. Interobserver reliabilities were reported in radiographic and ultrasonographic investigations with almost perfect agreement. MRI studies demonstrated agreement ranging between substantial to almost perfect. Intraobserver reliability was only reported in radiographic studies pertinent to medial gapping and was found to be almost perfect. Correlation of MRI with clinical findings was moderate to strong (65-92%). Additionally, MRI imaging was more sensitive in the detection of MCL lesions when compared to clinical examination. However, when compared to surgical findings, MRI underestimated the grade of instability in up to 21% of cases. Furthermore, MRI showed relatively inferior performance in the identification of the exact MCL-lesion location when compared to surgical findings. Interestingly, preoperative clinical examination was slightly inferior to stress radiography in the detection of MCL lesions. However, clinical testing under general anaesthesia performed similar to stress radiography. The methodological quality analysis showed a low risk of bias regarding patient selection and index testing in each imaging modality. CONCLUSION: MRI can reliably diagnose an MCL lesion but demonstrates limitations in its ability to predict the specific lesion location or grade of MCL instability. Ultrasonography is a widely available, radiation free modality, but is rarely used in clinical practice for detecting MCL lesions and clinical or surgical correlates are scarce. Stress radiography findings correlate with surgical findings but clinical correlations are missing in the literature. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Early medial reconstruction combined with severely injured medial collateral ligaments can decrease residual medial laxity in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to describe an anatomic medial knee reconstruction technique for combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and grade III medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries and to assess knee function and stability restoration in patients who underwent primary MCL reconstruction compared with primary repair. METHODS: A total of 105 patients who had undergone anatomic ACL reconstruction between 2008 and 2017 were enrolled in this retrospective study and divided into two groups according to concomitant MCL ruptures. Group A included patients with isolated ACL ruptures without MCL injuries. Group B included patients with both ACL and MCL injuries, and it was subdivided into three groups according to the severity of the MCL injury and treatment modality: B-1, grade I or II MCL injury treated conservatively; B-2: grade III MCL injury treated by primary MCL repair; and B-3: grade III MCL injury treated by primary reconstruction. Knee stability was measured via Telos valgus radiography at 6-month and 2-year postoperative. The Lysholm score, Tegner activity level, Likert scales (satisfaction), and return to previous sports were evaluated at 2-year postoperative. RESULTS: At 6-month postoperative, there was no significant difference in medial laxity between the B-2 and B-3 groups. However, at 2-year postoperative, medial laxity were significantly higher both at 30° of flexion (5.2° versus 2.2°, p = 0.020) and at full extension (3.4° versus 1.1°, p < 0.001) in patients in B-2 group compared to those in B-3 group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with respect to Lysholm scores, Tegner activity levels, Likert scales (satisfaction), and returning to previous sports at the 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Primary medial reconstruction combined with severely injured MCL in ACL reconstruction may decrease residual medial laxity more than primary repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective observational study, IV.

Do Fixed or Mobile Bearing Implants Have Better Survivorship in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

BACKGROUND: During the last 5 years, there has been an increase in the use of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to treat knee osteoarthritis in Australia, and these account for almost 6% of annual knee replacement procedures. However, there is debate as to whether a fixed bearing or a mobile bearing design is best for decreasing revision for loosening and disease progression as well as improving survivorship. Small sample sizes and possible confounding in the studies on the topic may have masked differences between fixed and mobile bearing designs. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), we selected the four contemporary designs of medial compartment UKA: mobile bearing, fixed modular, all-polyethylene, and fixed molded metal-backed used for the treatment of osteoarthritis to ask: (1) How do the different designs of unicompartmental knees compare with survivorship as measured by cumulative percentage revision (CPR)? (2) Is there a difference in the revision rate between designs as a function of patient sex or age? (3) Do the reasons for revision differ, and what types of revision procedures are performed when these UKA are revised? METHODS: The AOANJRR longitudinally maintains data on all primary and revision joint arthroplasties, with nearly 100% capture. The study population included all UKA procedures undertaken for osteoarthritis between September 1999 and December 2018. Of 56,628 unicompartmental knees recorded during the study period, 50,380 medial UKA procedures undertaken for osteoarthritis were included in the analysis after exclusion of procedures with unknown bearing types (31 of 56,628), lateral or patellofemoral compartment UKA procedures (5657 of 56,628), and those performed for a primary diagnosis other than osteoarthritis (560 of 56,628). There were 50,380 UKA procedures available for analysis. The study group consisted of 40% (20,208 of 50,380) mobile bearing UKA, 35% (17,822 of 50,380) fixed modular UKA, 23% (11,461 of 50,380) all-polyethylene UKA, and 2% (889 of 50,380) fixed molded metal-backed UKA. There were similar sex proportions and age distributions for each bearing group. The overall mean age of patients was 65 ± 9.4 years, and 55% (27,496 of 50,380) of patients were males. The outcome measure was the CPR, which was defined using Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship to describe the time to the first revision. Hazard ratios from Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for sex and age, were performed to compare the revision rates among groups. The cohort was stratified into age groups of younger than 65 years and 65 years and older to compare revision rates as a function of age. Differences among bearing groups for the major causes and modes of revision were assessed using hazard ratios. RESULTS: At 15 years, fixed modular UKA had a CPR of 16% (95% CI 15% to 17%). In comparison, the CPR was 23% (95% CI 22% to 24%) for mobile bearing UKA, 26% (95% CI 24% to 27%) for all-polyethylene UKA, and 20% (95% CI 16% to 24%) for fixed molded metal-backed UKA. The lower revision rate for fixed modular UKA was seen through the entire period compared with mobile bearing UKA (hazard ratio 1.5 [95% CI 1.4 to 1.6]; p < 0.001) and fixed molded metal-backed UKA (HR 1.3 [95% CI 1.1 to 1.6]; p = 0.003), but it varied with time compared with all-polyethylene UKA. The findings were consistent when stratified by sex or age. Although all-polyethylene UKA had the highest revision rate overall and for patients younger than 65 years, for patients aged 65 years and older, there was no difference between all-polyethylene and mobile bearing UKA. When compared with fixed modular UKA, a higher revision risk for loosening was shown in both mobile bearing UKA (HR 1.7 [95% CI 1.5 to 1.9]; p < 0.001) and all-polyethylene UKA (HR 2.4 [95% CI 2.1 to 2.7]; p < 0.001). The revision risk for disease progression was higher for all-polyethylene UKA at all time points (HR 1.4 [95% CI 1.3 to 1.6]; p < 0.001) and for mobile bearing UKA after 8 years when each were compared with fixed modular UKA (8 to 12 years: HR 1.4 [95% CI 1.2 to 1.7]; p < 0.001; 12 or more years: HR 1.9 [95% CI 1.5 to 2.3]; p < 0.001). The risk of revision to TKA was higher for mobile bearing UKA compared with fixed modular UKA (HR 1.4 [95% CI 1.3 to 1.5]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: If UKA is to be considered for the treatment of isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis, the fixed modular UKA bearing has the best survivorship of the current UKA designs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Medial collateral ligament reconstruction graft isometry is effected by femoral position more than tibial position.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the length change patterns of the native medial structures of the knee and determine the effect on graft length change patterns for different tibial and femoral attachment points for previously described medial reconstructions. METHODS: Eight cadaveric knee specimens were prepared by removing the skin and subcutaneous fat. The sartorius fascia was divided to allow clear identification of the medial ligamentous structures. Knees were then mounted in a custom-made rig and the quadriceps muscle and the iliotibial tract were loaded, using cables and hanging weights. Threads were mounted between tibial and femoral pins positioned in the anterior, middle, and posterior parts of the attachment sites of the native superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) and posterior oblique ligament (POL). Pins were also placed at the attachment sites relating to two commonly used medial reconstructions (Bosworth/Lind and LaPrade). Length changes between the tibiofemoral pin combinations were measured using a rotary encoder as the knee was flexed through an arc of 0-120°. RESULTS: With knee flexion, the anterior fibres of the sMCL tightened (increased in length 7.4% ± 2.9%) whilst the posterior fibres slackened (decreased in length 8.3% ± 3.1%). All fibre regions of the POL displayed a uniform lengthening of approximately 25% between 0 and 120° knee flexion. The most isometric tibiofemoral combination was between pins placed representing the middle fibres of the sMCL (Length change = 5.4% ± 2.1% with knee flexion). The simulated sMCL reconstruction that produced the least length change was the Lind/Bosworth reconstruction with the tibial attachment at the insertion of the semitendinosus and the femoral attachment in the posterior part of the native sMCL attachment side (5.4 ± 2.2%). This appeared more isometric than using the attachment positions described for the LaPrade reconstruction (10.0 ± 4.8%). CONCLUSION: The complex behaviour of the native MCL could not be imitated by a single point-to-point combination and surgeons should be aware that small changes in the femoral MCL graft attachment position will significantly effect graft length change patterns. Reconstructing the sMCL with a semitendinosus autograft, left attached distally to its tibial insertion, would appear to have a minimal effect on length change compared to detaching it and using the native tibial attachment site. A POL graft must always be tensioned near extension to avoid capturing the knee or graft failure.

Intraoperative repair for iatrogenic MCL tear due to medial pie-crusting in TKA yields satisfactory mid-term outcomes.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the rate of iatrogenic mid-substance superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) tear due to the medial pie-crusting technique during varus deformity total knee arthroplasty and compare the knee society score (KSS), range of motion (ROM), and instability rate of the repaired group to the control group with intact sMCL. METHODS: For this retrospective series of prospectively collected data, the multiple needle puncturing technique was performed for 653 out of the 1768 knees during algorithmic medial soft-tissue release. Iatrogenic tear was observed in 35 knees (5%); hence, repair with running locking nonabsorbable braided suture was performed. Patients were visited and reviewed both clinically and radiographically at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and annually thereafter. Chi-square, ANOVA, Mann-Whitney, independent and paired t test were used to analyze the variables. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: 85% of the repaired sMCL had stable joints with a mean KSS of 88 ± 3 and a mean ROM of 103 ± 11 degrees (°). The other five patients (15%) with mean KSS of 40 ± 8 and mean ROM of 81° ± 5° had an instability and needed to undergo a revision surgery. The control group had a mean KSS of 86 ± 15 and mean ROM of 107° ± 8°; however, 7 knees had an instability and needed a revision surgery. No significant difference was observed in terms of KSS (P = 0.86) and ROM (P = 0.64) between the control and repaired groups. CONCLUSION: The mid-substance sMCL tear is an important intraoperative complication of medial pie-crusting. Repairing this iatrogenic tear with nonabsorbable suture had satisfying clinical outcomes regarding the postoperative knee ROM and KSS in comparison to the control group. However, there is a chance of failure, which should be perceived by the surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic studies, investigating the results of treatment, Level III.

Effect of medial collateral ligament release and osteophyte resection on medial laxity in total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The concept of medial stabilizing technique total knee arthroplasty (MST-TKA) is to minimize the medial release without the superficial layer of medial collateral ligament (MCL). However, it is unclear at what stage the proper medial laxity is obtained during surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate the implication of deep layer of MCL (dMCL) and osteophyte resection on medial laxity during MST-TKA. METHODS: A total of 103 consecutive patients who underwent cruciate-retaining TKA using the navigation system were included. The intraoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle was recorded under three conditions (no stress, valgus, and varus stress) at four time points after the resection of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and meniscus (1st evaluation), after the dMCL release (2nd evaluation), and after osteophyte resection on both the femoral and tibial side (3rd evaluation). To assess valgus laxity, the differences in intraoperative HKA angle between 1st and 2nd evaluation (stage 1) and between 2nd and 3rd evaluation (stage 2) were calculated. RESULTS: Under the valgus stress condition, the intraoperative HKA angle change in stage 2 was significantly larger than that in stage 1 in full extension (stage 1; - 0.5 ± 1.0°, stage 2; - 2.0 ± 1.3°, p < 0.001) and 30° flexion (stage 1; - 0.8 ± 1.4°, stage 2; - 1.5 ± 2.0°, p = 0.008). There were no significant differences at 60° and 90° of knee flexion. Under the no stress and varus stress conditions, there were no significant differences in knee flexion at all angles. CONCLUSION: The medial laxity during MST-TKA increased significantly more after dMCL release and osteophyte resection than after just dMCL release at full extension and 30° flexion, and it was, therefore, considered that osteophyte resection is a key procedure for a successful MST-TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic prospective cohort study.

Treatment of medial-sided injuries in patients with early bicruciate ligament reconstruction for knee dislocation.

PURPOSE: In knee dislocation with bicruciate ligament and medial side injury (KDIIIM), treatment method of medial side injuries is controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of non-operative treatment of proximal and midsubstance and operative treatment of distal avulsion medial collateral ligament (MCL) ruptures in patients with early bicruciate reconstruction. METHODS: One-hundred and forty-seven patients with a knee dislocation and bicruciate ligament injury (KDII-KDV) were identified. Sixty-two patients had KDIIIM injury. Of these, 24 patients were excluded and 13 were lost to follow-up. With a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, IKDC2000 (subjective and objective), Lysholm and Tegner scores and stress radiographs were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were available for follow-up: 18 had a proximal or midsubstance grade-III MCL rupture (proximal MCL group) and 7 had a distal MCL avulsion (distal MCL group). In the proximal MCL and distal MCL groups, respectively, median IKDC2000 subjective scores were 80 (range 57-99) and 62 (range 39-87), and median Lysholm scores were 88 (range 57-99) and 75 (range 40-100). The median medial opening (side-to-side difference) was 2.4 mm (range 0.1-9.2) in the proximal MCL group and 2.5 mm (range 0.2-4.8) in the distal MCL group. CONCLUSION: We found acceptable recorded outcomes in patients who underwent non-operative treatment of proximal and midsubstance grade-III MCL rupture and operative treatment of distal MCL avulsion with early bicruciate ligament reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Influence of Intraoperative Medial Collateral Ligament Bony Avulsion Injury on the Outcome of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is (1) to find the clinical and radiological outcome of intraoperative bony avulsion of medial collateral ligament (MCL) treated with screw and washer construct and (2) to predict the preoperative factors which may contribute to the avulsion-type MCL injury during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Intraoperative MCL avulsion injury occurred in 46 (0.8%) of the 4916 consecutive primary TKA from January 2011 to December 2015. After exclusion, the 41 knees were matched 1:2 with controls without MCL injury and compared for the various clinical, radiological, and functional parameters. The clinical parameters analyzed were age, gender, body mass index, preoperative diagnosis like osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, range of motion, sagittal deformity, and vitamin D levels. The radiological parameters calculated were coronal deformity, proximal tibial varus angle, distal femur valgus angle, joint line congruence angle, posterior tibial slope, "cup and saucer" morphology, presence or absence of knee subluxation, tibia vara, and femoral bowing. The preoperative and postoperative Knee Society Score and Knee Society Functional Score were analyzed. Complications or revisions, if any, were noted during the follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to predict the preoperative risk factors for MCL avulsion injury. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 58.4 ± 19.3 months, there were no radiological or physical examination findings of instability. Compared to the preoperative disability, there was a statistically significant improvement in clinical scores (Knee Society Score and Knee Society Functional Score) in the final follow-up (P < .001) in both cases and the control group. The mean preoperative coronal deformity was 170.6 ± 6.96 in the study group and 167.7 ± 4.3 in the control group (P = .021). The mean preoperative tibial slope was 10.5 ± 4.9 in the study group and 7.91 ± 4.15 in the control group (P = .003). The preoperative knee subluxation was present in 48.8% knees (P < .001) and "cup and saucer" morphology in 68.3 knees (P < .001) in the study group. The adjusted odds of MCL avulsion injury were greater for severe varus deformity (odds ratio [OR] 1.462, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-1.86), knee subluxation (OR 39.78, 95% CI 3.78-418.86), and "cup and saucer" morphology (OR 33.11, 95% CI 5.69-192.66). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative MCL bony avulsion injury can be managed successfully with screw and washer construct without the need for increased prosthetic constraint in primary TKA. The presence of severe varus deformity, knee subluxation, and "cup and saucer" morphology tend to have an increased chance of MCL avulsion injury.

Anatomic reconstruction of the medial collateral ligament in multi-ligaments knee injury using achilles allograft : a modification of Marx's technique.

Medial Collateral Ligament (MCL) injury may require operative treatment. Marx et al. described the latest technique for reconstruction of MCL. While good results have been reported using the Marx technique, some issues have been observed. To address the mentioned issues, a modification to the Marx technique has been devised. Eleven patients were enrolled and their ligaments were repaired by the fixation of allograft on the proximal and distal attachment footprints of the superficial MCL. For preventing loss of knee ROM, MCL and other ligaments were reconstructed in 2 separate stages. At the last follow up the ROM, knee ligament laxity and functional outcome scores, subjective (IKDC) and Lysholm score were evaluated and recorded. Knee motion was maintained in all cases. Two cases demonstrated 1+ valgus instability at 30 degrees of knee flexion. Both were treated for combined MCL and PCL tear, the rest were stable. The average IKDC-subjective score was 93 ± 4 and the average Lysholm score was 92 ± 3. All patients were satisfied and returned to their previous level of activity. In this technique, the superficial MCL was recon- structed closer to its anatomical construct. Patients didn't have any complaints of hardware under the skin and the need for a second surgery for hardware removal was avoided. Patients didn't have any complaints of hardware under the skin and the need for a second surgery for hardware removal was avoided. Also reconstructing the ligaments in 2 stages helped to preserve the knee motion. Level of Evidence : Level IV therapeutic.

Pie-crusting of proximal medial collateral ligament for correcting varus deformity in total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Aim of this study was to compare outcomes of a newer technique of pie-crusting of the femoral origin of medial collateral ligament (MCL) with the conventional medial release, for correcting varus deformity during total knee arthroplasty. Null hypothesis was that there is no difference in clinical outcomes between these two techniques. METHODS: All patients requiring an additional medial release after excision of osteophytes and release of deep MCL during total knee arthroplasty were allocated into two groups, alternately. Each group composed of 40 patients. Pie-crusting with a needle was done near the femoral attachment of superficial MCL in group-1, whereas the group-2 underwent classic sub-periosteal release of the tibial insertion of superficial MCL. All the patients were assessed for any laxity (more than 3 mm opening) intraoperatively or at one-year follow-up, pain score at 12 and 24 h after the surgery, Knee Society Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index and range of motion 12 months after the surgery. RESULTS: None of the patients showed any signs of laxity or failure at one-year follow-up. Pain scores were slightly better (not statistically significant) in the group-1. However, no differences were noted in functional outcomes scores. CONCLUSION: Pie-crusting of superficial MCL is a safe, controlled and less invasive approach for medial soft tissue release. When knee deformity is not correctable with initial soft tissue release, this is an appropriate next surgical step. There does not appear to be a risk of over-release during the surgery or afterward. STUDY DESIGN: Non-randomized controlled trial, Level II.