Placebo Effects Are Small on Average in the 7.5% CO2 Inhalational Model of Generalized Anxiety.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety disorders are highly prevalent and socio-economically costly. Novel pharmacological treatments for these disorders are needed because many patients do not respond to current agents or experience unwanted side effects. However, a barrier to treatment development is the variable and large placebo response rate seen in trials of novel anxiolytics. Despite this, the mechanisms that drive placebo responses in anxiety disorders have been little investigated, possibly due to low availability of convenient experimental paradigms. We aimed to develop and test a novel protocol for inducing placebo anxiolysis in the 7.5% CO2 inhalational model of generalized anxiety in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Following a baseline 20-minute CO2 challenge, 32 healthy volunteers were administered a placebo intranasal spray labelled as either the anxiolytic "lorazepam" or "saline." Following this, participants surreptitiously underwent a 20-minute inhalation of normal air. Post-conditioning, a second dose of the placebo was administered, after which participants completed another CO2 challenge. RESULTS: Participants administered sham "lorazepam" reported significant positive expectations of reduced anxiety (P = .001), but there was no group-level placebo effect on anxiety following CO2 challenge post-conditioning (Ps > .350). Surprisingly, we found many participants exhibited unexpected worsening of anxiety, despite positive expectations. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to our hypothesis, our novel paradigm did not induce a placebo response, on average. It is possible that effects of 7.5% CO2 inhalation on prefrontal cortex function or behavior in line with a Bayesian predictive coding framework attenuated the effect of expectations on subsequent placebo response. Future studies are needed to explore these possibilities.

A Comparison of Injectable Diazepam and Lorazepam in the Goal-Directed Management of Severe Alcohol Withdrawal.

BACKGROUND: Benzodiazepines are the gold standard for treatment of alcohol withdrawal, yet the selection of a preferred benzodiazepine is limited due to a lack of comparative studies. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of injectable lorazepam (LZP) and diazepam (DZP) in the treatment of severe alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to an intensive care unit with a primary diagnosis of AWS. Subjects who received at least 12 LZP equivalent units (LEU) of injectable DZP or LZP within 24 hours of initiation of the severe AWS protocol were included. The primary outcome was time with Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol-Revised (CIWA-Ar) scores at goal over the first 24 hours of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 191 patients were included (DZP n = 89, LZP n = 102). Time with CIWA-Ar scores at goal during the first 24 hours was similar between groups (DZP 12 hours [interquartile range, IQR, = 9-15] vs LZP 14 hours [IQR = 10-17]), P = 0.06). At 24 hours, LEU requirement was similar (DZP 40 [IQR = 22-78] vs LZP 32 [IQR = 18-56], P = 0.05). Drug cost at 24 hours was higher in the DZP group ($204.6 [IQR = 112.53-398.97] vs $8 [IQR = 4.5-14], P < 0.01). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: DZP or LZP are equally efficacious for the treatment of severe AWS. LZP may be preferred due to cost but both medications can be used interchangeably based on availability.

Thought Blocking as a Manifestation of Catatonia: A Case Report.

ABSTRACT: Catatonia is an underrecognized disorder that has been widely described as a psychomotor syndrome, with little emphasis on its thought and cognitive dimensions. The current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision describes only motor and behavioral presentations, whereas a few catatonia scales describe only one form of thought disorders, which is thought perseveration. Thought blocking, a disorder of the thought process, is characterized by regular interruptions in the thought stream. It was described by several scholars as a sign of schizophrenia, with few reports describing thought blocking in association with catatonia. In this article, we describe the course of a patient with bipolar I disorder who presented with catatonia and demonstrated thought blocking. Her catatonic symptoms and thought blocking improved with the addition of lorazepam, recurred upon lorazepam discontinuation, and improved with resumption of lorazepam, demonstrating a clear on/off phenomenon. This report highlights the importance of recognizing thought and cognitive manifestations of catatonia, as it can enhance recognition and improve treatment.

A Retrospective Evaluation of Adjunctive Phenobarbital vs. Benzodiazepine Alone for the Treatment of Moderate Alcohol Withdrawal in the Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Phenobarbital has been used in the emergency department (ED) as both a primary and adjunctive medication for alcohol withdrawal, but previous studies evaluating its impact on patient outcomes are limited by heterogenous symptom severity. OBJECTIVES: We compared the clinical outcomes of ED patients with moderate alcohol withdrawal who received phenobarbital, with or without benzodiazepines, with patients who received benzodiazepine treatment alone. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single academic medical center utilizing chart review of ED patients with moderate alcohol withdrawal between 2015 and 2020. Patient encounters were classified into two treatment categories based on medication treatment: phenobarbital alone or in combination with benzodiazepines vs. benzodiazepines alone. Chi-square test or Fisher's exact was used to analyze categorical variables and the Student's t-test for continuous data. RESULTS: Among the 287 encounters that met inclusion criteria, 100 received phenobarbital, compared with 187 that received benzodiazepines alone. Patients who received phenobarbital were provided significantly more lorazepam equivalents. There was a significant difference in the percentage of patient encounters that required admission to the hospital in the phenobarbital cohort compared with the benzodiazepine cohort (75% vs. 43.3%, p < 0.001). However, there was no difference in admission level of care to the floor (51.2% vs. 52.0%), stepdown (33.8% vs. 28%), or intensive care unit (15% vs. 20%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received phenobarbital for moderate alcohol withdrawal were more likely to be admitted to the hospital, but there was no difference in admission level of care when compared with patients who received benzodiazepines alone. Patients who received phenobarbital were provided greater lorazepam equivalents in the ED.

GABAergic Involvement in Selective Attention.

Animals need to cope with abundant sensory information, and one strategy is to selectively direct attention to only the most relevant part of the environment. Although the cortical networks of selective attention have been studied extensively, its underlying neurotransmitter systems, especially the role of the inhibitory neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), remain less well understood. Increased GABAA receptor activity because of administration of benzodiazepines such as lorazepam is known to slow reactions in cognitive tasks. However, there is limited knowledge about GABAergic involvement in selective attention. Particularly, it is unknown whether increased GABAA receptor activity slows the build-up of selectivity or generally widens attentional focus. To address this question, participants (n = 29) received 1 mg lorazepam and placebo (within-subjects, double-blind) and performed an extended version of the flanker task. The spatial distribution of selective attention was studied by systematically manipulating number and position of incongruent flankers; the temporal build-up was characterized using delta plots. An online task version was presented to an independent, unmedicated sample (n = 25) to verify task effects. Under placebo and in the unmedicated sample, only the number of incongruent flankers, but not their position, influenced RTs. Incongruent flankers impaired RTs more strongly under lorazepam than placebo, especially when adjacent to the target. Delta plot analyses of RT showed that this effect persisted even when participants reacted slowly, indicating that lorazepam-induced impairments in selective attention do not result from simply slowed down build-up of selectivity. Instead, our data indicate that increased GABAA receptor activity widens the attentional focus.

Characterization of Extended-Release Lorazepam: Pharmacokinetic Results Across Phase 1 Clinical Studies.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Once-daily extended-release (ER) lorazepam was developed to reduce fluctuations in plasma levels compared with lorazepam immediate-release (IR) for short-term anxiety relief. Here we report a series of phase 1 randomized, open-label, multiperiod crossover studies characterizing ER lorazepam pharmacokinetics and safety in healthy adults. METHODS/PROCEDURES: These phase 1 studies assessed the pharmacokinetics of ER lorazepam administered: (study 1) 3 mg once daily versus IR lorazepam 1 mg 3 times a day (TID; every 8 hours), (study 2) with or without food, and (study 3) intact versus sprinkled onto food. Study 3 further evaluated the proportionality of 1 × 4- versus 4 × 1-mg doses. Safety was also monitored. FINDINGS/RESULTS: There were 43, 27, and 29 subjects who completed studies 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The 90% confidence intervals for Cmax,SS , Cmin , and AUC TAU,SS of once-daily ER lorazepam compared with IR given TID were within 80% to 125% limits establishing steady-state bioequivalence. Maximum mean lorazepam concentrations were achieved at 11 hours compared with 1 hour after dosing for ER versus IR lorazepam, respectively. Pharmacokinetic parameters ( Cmax , AUC last or AUC 0- t , AUC inf or AUC 0-inf ) of ER lorazepam were bioequivalent whether taken with or without food, administered intact or sprinkled onto food, or administered as intact 1 × 4- versus 4 × 1-mg capsules. No serious safety concerns were found. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily ER lorazepam provided a pharmacokinetic profile bioequivalent to IR lorazepam given TID and was well tolerated in healthy adults across all phase 1 studies. These data suggest that ER lorazepam could be an alternative for patients currently treated with IR lorazepam.

Surge of Midazolam Use in the Midst of Lorazepam Shortage.

BACKGROUND: Lorazepam is a widely prescribed benzodiazepine that is used to manage anxiety, insomnia, and status epilepticus and is used for pre-anesthetic care as well as several off-label indications including aggression, alcohol withdrawal, panic disorder, chemotherapy-associated anticipatory nausea, and catatonia. Recent increases in demand, manufacturing changes, and quality control issues have resulted in a shortage of injectable and oral lorazepam, prompting clinicians to use alternatives. One such alternative is midazolam, a drug that has been used primarily in the intensive care unit and anesthesia settings. PROCEDURES: This article examines the significant pharmacologic differences between lorazepam and midazolam. In addition, this article provides dosage guidelines based on the current scientific knowledge and recommendations for conversion equivalencies. RESULTS: The clinical preference for lorazepam can be attributed to its simpler metabolism with no active metabolites, better suitability for patients with less severe hepatic and renal impairment, less risk of adverse reactions, fewer drug-drug interactions, and greater desirability for special populations. In periods of shortages, midazolam has been shown to be effective for a number of off-label uses. To manage conditions that have not been extensively studied, clinicians may opt to use conversion equivalencies, with the caveat that guidelines may vary greatly between institutions and online sources; therefore, it would be best to start low and titrate slowly. CONCLUSIONS: Our goal is to aid clinicians in safely and effectively prescribing midazolam during the shortage of injectable lorazepam so that patients are provided the same effects and benefits.

Catatonia and Delirium: Assessment of Comorbidity, Prevalence, and Therapeutic Response in Medically Ill Inpatients From a University Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Catatonia is a cluster of motor features present in multiple psychiatric and clinical diseases. It may be confused with delirium because both entities are classified according to the type and degree of psychomotor activity. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, criteria for catatonia secondary to medical conditions exclude comorbid catatonia and delirium; besides, there have been increasing reports about a comorbid presentation. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of comorbid catatonia and delirium, the therapeutic response to lorazepam, and the clinical characteristics of patients with an earlier diagnosis of delirium. METHODS: A total of 120 consecutive patients at a university hospital with an earlier diagnosis of delirium were evaluated using the Delirium Scale (confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit) and the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale for catatonia. In cases of a positive diagnosis of catatonia or catatonia/delirium, a therapeutic trial with intramuscular lorazepam was performed. FINDINGS: Thirty-one patients (26%) were positive for both catatonia and delirium, and 8 patients (7%) had catatonia. Sixty-six patients (55%) were positive only for delirium, and 5 patients (4%) were negative for delirium and catatonia. Lorazepam tests were applied on 22 patients. One in 9 patients with catatonia/delirium responded positively to lorazepam. Patients with catatonia had a 60% positive response rate. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study on lorazepam use in catatonia-delirium patients; however, further studies are needed to determine the safety and efficacy of lorazepam in these patients. Catatonia and catatonia/delirium are underdiagnosed in inpatient wards and should be routinely assessed in patients with an altered mental status.

Comparison of Droperidol and Midazolam Versus Haloperidol and Lorazepam for Acute Agitation Management in the Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Acute agitation accounts for up to 2.6% of visits to the emergency department (ED). To date, a standard of care for the management of acute agitation has not been established. Few studies have evaluated antipsychotic and benzodiazepine combinations. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate effectiveness and safety of combination therapy for acute agitation with intramuscular (IM) droperidol and midazolam (D+M) compared with IM haloperidol and lorazepam (H+L) in patients in the ED. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective medical record review of patients presenting to a large, academic ED with acute agitation from July 2020 through October 2021. The primary outcome was percentage of patients requiring additional agitation medication within 60 minutes of combination administration. Secondary outcomes included average time to repeat dose administration and average number of repeat doses required before ED discharge. RESULTS: A total of 306 patients were included for analysis: 102 in the D+M group and 204 in the H+L group. Repeat dose within 60 minutes occurred in 7 (6.9%) and 28 (13.8%) patients in the D+M and H+L groups, respectively (P = 0.065). A total of 28.4% of D+M patients and 30.9% of H+L patients required any repeat dose during their ED visit. Time to repeat dose was 12 and 24 minutes in the D+M and H+L, respectively (P = 0.22). The adverse event rate was 2.9% in each group. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: IM D+M resulted in a lower rate of repeat doses of acute agitation medication compared with IM H+L, though this was not statistically significant. Both therapies were safe, and the adverse event rate was low.

Methamphetamine-associated catatonia: Case series and systematic review of the literature from 1943-2020.

BACKGROUND: Catatonia due to a general medical condition may result from a variety of causes, including substance intoxication and withdrawal. Stimulants are occasionally associated with catatonia, though there has been little investigation of methamphetamine's relationship to catatonia. Here we present 5 cases of catatonia associated with methamphetamine use and a systematic review of the associated literature from 1943 to 2020. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature and present 5 cases of catatonia evaluated using the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale and KANNER catatonia rating scale. RESULTS: Methamphetamine use was associated with catatonia in a small number of cases in the literature. However, some of these reports included other possible etiologies. The patients in our case series met DSM-5 criteria for catatonia due to a general medical condition, with all reporting recent methamphetamine use and testing positive for amphetamines on urine drug screen. CONCLUSIONS: Given the ongoing rise in methamphetamine use in the United States, it is important that clinicians understand that methamphetamine use can be associated with catatonia. Patients with methamphetamine-associated catatonia may respond favorably to lorazepam and require shorter hospital stays than other catatonic patients. Lastly, methamphetamine-associated catatonia highlights how alteration in dopamine function and projections may be a critical neural mechanism underlying catatonia in general.

COVID-19 and catatonia: Prevalence, challenges, pathophysiology, and treatment.

BACKGROUND: Emerging literature supports the association between acute COVID-19 infection and neuropsychiatric complications. This article reviews the evidence for catatonia as a potential neuropsychiatric sequela of COVID-19 infection. METHODS: PubMed was searched using the terms catatonia, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, and COVID-19. Articles were limited to those published in the English language between 2020 and 2022. Forty-five articles that specifically studied catatonia associated with acute COVID-19 infection were screened. RESULTS: Overall, 30% of patients with severe COVID-19 infection developed psychiatric symptoms. We found 41 cases of COVID-19 and catatonia, with clinical presentations that varied in onset, duration, and severity. One death was reported in a case of catatonia. Cases were reported in patients with and without a known psychiatric history. Lorazepam was successfully used, along with electroconvulsive therapy, antipsychotics, and other treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Greater recognition and treatment of catatonia in individuals with COVID-19 infection is warranted. Clinicians should be familiar with recognizing catatonia as a potential outcome of COVID-19 infection. Early detection and appropriate treatment are likely to lead to better outcomes.

Sublingual lorazepam as rescue therapy for seizure emergencies in adults.

OBJECTIVE: Limited acute home treatments are available for patients with prolonged (>5 minutes) or repetitive (≥2 in 24 hours) seizures. While this early seizure treatment may reduce the need for emergency care, intermittent intranasal benzodiazepine formulations are expensive and rectal diazepam administration is often socially unacceptable. We determined whether caregivers could use sublingual lorazepam oral concentrate solution effectively as acute treatment for adults with prolonged and repetitive seizures. METHODS: Patients prescribed sublingual lorazepam solution at the Johns Hopkins Epilepsy Center for acute seizure treatment during a 5-year period (2012-2017) were screened. We determined clinical history of seizure patterns and number of antiseizure medications (ASMs) through patient and caregiver surveys, and we verified this history in patients' medical records and charts. During a 2-year span (2017-2018), patients and caregivers were surveyed on responses to their most recent use of sublingual lorazepam solution, including seizure cessation (prolonged seizure stopping <5 minutes or ≤1 repetitive seizure), presence of sedation and adverse events within 24 hours of administration, and whether refrigeration limited use. RESULTS: In total, 52 patients used sublingual lorazepam for treatment of acute seizures during the study period (median dose 1 mg, range 0.5 to 2 mg). Of them, 48 patients participated in treatment survey interviews. Family caregivers usually administered lorazepam (88%); 3 self-administered. Patients were surveyed on responses to their most recent use of sublingual lorazepam treatment: 66% (23/35) of patients with repetitive seizures reported no further seizure activity after administering treatment; 70% (7/10) with prolonged seizures reported seizure activity ceased within 5 minutes of treatment. Three patients treated auras and had no seizures. There were no serious adverse events during most recent use: 31% of patients developed moderate/severe sedation. Of note, 98% refrigerated lorazepam, often with coolers; 44%, however, said this limited treatment access. There was high treatment satisfaction; 79% reported that having the emergency treatment available made them feel safer. SIGNIFICANCE: This patient survey and retrospective chart review demonstrates that home treatment with sublingual lorazepam solution may be effective for interrupting prolonged and repetitive seizures. No patients had sedation complications with home doses of 0.5 to 2 mg, and patients report high satisfaction with the treatment.

Beyond benzodiazepines: a meta-analysis and narrative synthesis of the efficacy and safety of alternative options for alcohol withdrawal syndrome management.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of non-benzodiazepines (non-BZDs) to benzodiazepines (BZDs) in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). METHODS: For relevant literature, Google Scholar, PubMed, Embase, OVID MEDLINE, EBSCO, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched. Randomized control trials (RCTs) were included, omitted were nonblinded trials, blinded trials that were not randomized, and open-label studies. The Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment was used to assess the trial's quality. A meta-analysis and a narrative synthesis were carried out. RESULTS: Twenty non-BZDs and five BZDs were investigated in thirty RCTs. Meta-analysis favored gabapentin over chlordiazepoxide and lorazepam (d = 0.563, p < 0.001) and carbamazepine over oxazepam and lorazepam (d = 0.376, p = 0.029), for reducing Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol-Revised (CIWA-Ar) scale scores. Eleven non-BZDs fared better than BZDs for reducing CIWA-Ar, Total Severity Assessment, Selective Severity Assessment, Borg and Weinholdt, and Gross Rating Scale for Alcohol Withdrawal scores. Eight non-BZDs outmatched BZDs regarding autonomic, motor, awareness, and psychiatric symptoms. Sedation and fatigue were prevalent in BZDs, while seizures were prevalent in non-BZDs. CONCLUSION: For AWS treatments, non-BZDs are superior to or equally effective as BZDs. Non-BZD adverse events warrant further investigation. Agents that inhibit gated ion channels are promising candidates. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022384875.

Pharmacologic predictors of benzodiazepine response trajectory in anxiety disorders: a Bayesian hierarchical modeling meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Despite frequent benzodiazepine use in anxiety disorders, the trajectory and magnitude of benzodiazepine response and the effects of benzodiazepine potency, lipophilicity, and dose on improvement are unknown. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis using weekly symptom severity data from randomized, parallel group, placebo-controlled trials of benzodiazepines in adults with anxiety disorders. Response was modeled for the standardized change in continuous measures of anxiety using a Bayesian hierarchical model. Change in anxiety was evaluated as a function of medication, disorder, time, potency, lipophilicity, and standardized dose and compared among benzodiazepines. RESULTS: Data from 65 trials (73 arms, 7 medications, 7110 patients) were included. In the logarithmic model of response, treatment effects emerged within 1 week of beginning treatment (standardized benzodiazepine-placebo difference = -0.235 ± 0.024, CrI: -0.283 to -0.186, P < .001) and placebo response plateaued at week 4. Doses <6 mg per day (lorazepam equivalents) produced faster and larger improvement than higher doses (P = .039 for low vs medium dose and P = .005 for high vs medium dose) and less lipophilic benzodiazepines (beta = 0.028 ± 0.013, P = .030) produced a greater response over time. Relative to the reference benzodiazepine (lorazepam), clonazepam (beta = -0.217 ± 0.95, P = .021) had a greater trajectory/magnitude of response (other specific benzodiazepines did not statistically differ from lorazepam). CONCLUSIONS: In adults with anxiety disorders, benzodiazepine-related improvement emerges early, and the trajectory and magnitude of improvement is related to dose and lipophilicity. Lower doses and less lipophilic benzodiazepines produce greater improvement.

Comparison of constructed wetland performance coupled with aeration and tubesettler for pharmaceutical compound removal from hospital wastewater.

Pharmaceutical compounds being able to alter, retard, and enhance metabolism has gained attention in recent time as emerging pollutant. However, hospitals which are part of every urban landscape have yet to gain attention in terms of its hospital wastewater treatment to inhibit pharmaceutical compounds from reaching environment. Hence this study evaluated performance of constructed wetland in combination with tubesettler and aeration based on removal efficiency and ecological risk assessment (HQ). The removal efficiency of constructed wetland with plantation was higher by 31% (paracetamol), 102% (ibuprofen), 46%, (carbamazepine), 57% (lorazepam), 54% (erythromycin), 31% (ciprofloxacin) and 20% (simvastatin) against constructed wetland without plantation. Constructed wetland with aeration efficiency increased for paracetamol, ibuprofen, carbamazepine, lorazepam, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, and simvastatin removal efficiency were higher by 58%, 130%, 52%, 79%, 107%, 57%, and 29% respectively. In constructed wetland with plantation, removal efficiency was higher by 20% (paracetamol), 13% (ibuprofen), 4% (carbamazepine), 14% (lorazepam), 34% (erythromycin), 19% (ciprofloxacin) and 7% (simvastatin). High ecological risk was observed for algae, invertebrate and fish with hazard quotient values in range of 2.5-484, 10-631 and 1-78 respectively. This study concludes that if space is the limitation at hospitals aeration with constructed wetland can be adopted. If space is available, constructed wetland with tubesettler is suitable, economic and environmentally friendly option. Future research works can focus on evaluating other processes combination with constructed wetland.

Analgesia and Sedation at Terminal Extubation: A Secondary Analysis From Death One Hour After Terminal Extubation Study Data.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the doses of opioids and benzodiazepines administered around the time of terminal extubation (TE) to children who died within 1 hour of TE and to identify their association with the time to death (TTD). DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data collected for the Death One Hour After Terminal Extubation study. SETTING: Nine U.S. hospitals. PATIENTS: Six hundred eighty patients between 0 and 21 years who died within 1 hour after TE (2010-2021). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Medications included total doses of opioids and benzodiazepines 24 hours before and 1 hour after TE. Correlations between drug doses and TTD in minutes were calculated, and multivariable linear regression performed to determine their association with TTD after adjusting for age, sex, last recorded oxygen saturation/F io2 ratio and Glasgow Coma Scale score, inotrope requirement in the last 24 hours, and use of muscle relaxants within 1 hour of TE. Median age of the study population was 2.1 years (interquartile range [IQR], 0.4-11.0 yr). The median TTD was 15 minutes (IQR, 8-23 min). Forty percent patients (278/680) received either opioids or benzodiazepines within 1 hour after TE, with the largest proportion receiving opioids only (23%, 159/680). Among patients who received medications, the median IV morphine equivalent within 1 hour after TE was 0.75 mg/kg/hr (IQR, 0.3-1.8 mg/kg/hr) ( n = 263), and median lorazepam equivalent was 0.22 mg/kg/hr (IQR, 0.11-0.44 mg/kg/hr) ( n = 118). The median morphine equivalent and lorazepam equivalent rates after TE were 7.5-fold and 22-fold greater than the median pre-extubation rates, respectively. No significant direct correlation was observed between either opioid or benzodiazepine doses before or after TE and TTD. After adjusting for confounding variables, regression analysis also failed to show any association between drug dose and TTD. CONCLUSIONS: Children after TE are often prescribed opioids and benzodiazepines. For patients dying within 1 hour of TE, TTD is not associated with the dose of medication administered as part of comfort care.

Efficacy and Safety of Anxiolytics in Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Patient anxiety can complicate surgical outcomes by elevating blood pressure, increasing the need for postoperative pain management, and reducing overall patient satisfaction. Despite the use of anxiolytic medications in outpatient procedures, there is limited comparative evidence on the efficacy and safety of these agents in Mohs micrographic surgery. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of different preprocedural anxiolytic agents in Mohs surgery on perioperative patient anxiety and patient satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted of 6 different preprocedural anxiolytic agents (lorazepam, diazepam, alprazolam, gabapentin, pregabalin, and melatonin) in 350 patients undergoing Mohs surgery. Anxiety and vital signs were recorded. RESULTS: Diazepam demonstrated a statistically significant, sustained reduction in anxiety levels compared with placebo ( p = .03). Gabapentin significantly reduced early anxiety ( p = .02). Alprazolam showed a trend to early anxiety reduction ( p = .08). Lorazepam ( p = .73), pregabalin ( p = .53), and melatonin ( p = .24) failed to reduce patient anxiety compared with placebo at any time point. No anxiolytic significantly impacted any patient vital sign or cognition. CONCLUSION: Although short-acting benzodiazepines and gamma-aminobutyric acid medications may have transient anxiolytic effects, a single oral dose of 5 mg of diazepam can provide a sustained anxiolytic effect in Mohs surgery, with excellent patient safety.

Common and dissociable effects of oxytocin and lorazepam on the neurocircuitry of fear.

Benzodiazepines (BZDs) represent the gold standard of anxiolytic pharmacotherapy; however, their clinical benefit is limited by side effects and addictive potential. Consequently, there is an urgent need to develop novel and safe anxiolytics. The peptide hormone oxytocin (OXT) exhibits anxiolytic-like properties in animals and humans, but whether OXT and BZDs share similar effects on the neural circuitry of fear is unclear. Therefore, the rationale of this ultra-high-field functional MRI (fMRI) study was to test OXT against the clinical comparator lorazepam (LZP) with regard to their neuromodulatory effects on local and network responses to fear-related stimuli. One hundred twenty-eight healthy male participants volunteered in this randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, between-group study. Before scanning using an emotional face-matching paradigm, participants were randomly administered a single dose of OXT (24 IU), LZP (1 mg), or placebo. On the behavioral level, LZP, but not OXT, caused mild sedation, as evidenced by a 19% increase in reaction times. On the neural level, both OXT and LZP inhibited responses to fearful faces vs. neutral faces within the centromedial amygdala (cmA). In contrast, they had different effects on intra-amygdalar connectivity; OXT strengthened the coupling between the cmA and basolateral amygdala, whereas LZP increased the interplay between the cmA and superficial amygdala. Furthermore, OXT, but not LZP, enhanced the coupling between the cmA and the precuneus and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex. These data implicate inhibition of the cmA as a common denominator of anxiolytic action, with only OXT inducing large-scale connectivity changes of potential therapeutic relevance.

Percutaneous absorption and Skin accumulation of Lorazepam-Diphenhydramine- Haloperidol Carbopol gel in Porcine Ear Skin.

This study presents the formulation and evaluation of an ABH Carbopol gel containing lorazepam (Ativan®), diphenhydramine hydrochloride (Benadryl®), and haloperidol (Haldol®) for treating chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in hospice patients. ABH PLO gel is widely used for this purpose due to its low cost and presumed efficacy. However, previous studies, including one conducted by the authors, have reported insufficient drug absorption from the ABH PLO gel. Here we hypothesized that the ABH Carbopol gel would provide superior percutaneous absorption of the drugs. ABH Carbopol gel was characterized for pH, viscosity, thermal properties, and infrared spectroscopy. The percutaneous absorption and skin retention of the gel was evaluated across porcine ear skin using Franz diffusion cells, and the drug concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. The pH of the ABH Carbopol gel was found to be 6.80 ± 0.33, and the retention time of diphenhydramine, haloperidol, and lorazepam were 4.73, 7.11, and 18.69 minutes, respectively. The thermogram of the ABH Carbopol gel indicates the drugs were present in the dissolved state. Based on the flux data, the estimated steady-state concentration (Css) of diphenhydramine, haloperidol, and lorazepam were found to be 44.64 ng/ml, 2.58 ng/ml, and 20.1 ng/ml, respectively. These values were significantly higher than those obtained from the ABH PLO gel. In conclusion, the ABH Carbopol gel provides a promising alternative to the ABH PLO gel for treating CINV in hospice patients. Further studies are required to validate these findings in clinical settings.

Dynamic Recovery: GABA Agonism Restores Neural Variability in Older, Poorer Performing Adults.

Aging is associated with cognitive impairment, but there are large individual differences in these declines. One neural measure that is lower in older adults and predicts these individual differences is moment-to-moment brain signal variability. Testing the assumption that GABA should heighten neural variability, we examined whether reduced brain signal variability in older, poorer performing adults could be boosted by increasing GABA pharmacologically. Brain signal variability was estimated using fMRI in 20 young and 24 older healthy human adults during placebo and GABA agonist sessions. As expected, older adults exhibited lower signal variability at placebo, and, crucially, GABA agonism boosted older adults' variability to the levels of young adults. Furthermore, poorer performing older adults experienced a greater increase in variability on drug, suggesting that those with more to gain benefit the most from GABA system potentiation. GABA may thus serve as a core neurochemical target in future work on aging- and cognition-related human brain dynamics.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Prior research indicates that moment-to-moment brain signal variability is lower in older, poorer performing adults. We found that this reduced brain signal variability could be boosted through GABA agonism in older adults to the levels of young adults and that this boost was largest in the poorer performing older adults. These results provide the first evidence that brain signal variability can be restored by increasing GABAergic activity and suggest the promise of developing interventions targeting inhibitory systems to help slow cognitive declines in healthy aging.