Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sex Transm Infect ; 92(3): 232-9, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26399264

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Qualified decision-making for the improved management of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) requires various sources of information. We aimed to estimate the STI-associated symptom prevalence and care-seeking patterns in the general population of Iran. METHODS: In 2014, using a street-based survey with a standard gender-specific questionnaire on STI-associated symptoms and willingness to seek treatment, we interviewed 9166 Iranian participants, who were selected from among the 18-60-year-old population using multistage sampling. Data were analysed via generalised estimating equation and survey analysis, taking into account a 95% confidence coefficient. RESULTS: About 67.3% of participants, mean age 33 years, were 'assumed sexually active' and were therefore eligible for inclusion. Approximately 39.9% (95% CI 28.4% to 51.4%) of women and 17.6% (95% CI 13.9% to 21.6%) of men reported at least one STI-associated symptom in the current week. The occurrence of symptoms decreased with an increase in age in both genders (p<0.05). About 21.2% (95% CI 13.3% to 29.1%) of women and 7.1% (95% CI 5.4% to 7.8%) of men treated symptoms themselves after symptoms first appeared. Of the women and men with symptoms, 37.4% (95% CI 24.8% to 50.0%) and 46.8% (95% CI 39.7% to 51.4%), respectively, sought care. Most women visited a gynaecologist and midwife; men tended to visit a general practitioner and urologist after their symptoms appeared. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of STI-associated symptoms in Iranian adults is considerable. The results emphasise the need for appropriate and timely STI care and more attention to sexual health promotion to mitigate onward and future infections. Attention to the care-seeking pattern is fundamental to policymaking and planning.


Assuntos
Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Médicos de Atenção Primária/classificação , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Análise por Conglomerados , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Clínicos Gerais , Ginecologia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Irã (Geográfico)/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tocologia , Prevalência , Autocuidado , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/psicologia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/terapia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Urologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Gen Intern Med ; 29(6): 947-55, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24567201

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although many specialists serve as primary care physicians (PCPs), the type of patients they serve, the range of services they provide, and the quality of care they deliver is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To describe trends in patient, physician, and visit characteristics, and compare visit-based quality for visits to generalists and specialists self-identified as PCPs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study and time trend analysis. DATA: Nationally representative sample of visits to office-based physicians from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1997-2010. MAIN MEASURES: Proportions of primary care visits to generalist and specialists, patient characteristics, principal diagnoses, and quality. KEY RESULTS: Among 84,041 visits to self-identified PCPs representing an estimated 4.0 billion visits, 91.5 % were to generalists, 5.9 % were to medical specialists and 2.6 % were to obstetrician/gynecologists. The proportion of PCP visits to generalists increased from 88.4 % in 1997 to 92.4 % in 2010, but decreased for medical specialists from 8.0 % to 4.8 %, p = 0.04). The proportion of medical specialist visits in which the physician self-identified as the patient's PCP decreased from 30.6 % in 1997 to 9.8 % in 2010 (p < 0.01). Medical specialist PCPs take care of older patients (mean age 61 years), and dedicate most of their visits to chronic disease management (51.0 %), while generalist PCPs see younger patients (mean age 55.4 years) most commonly for new problems (40.5 %). Obstetrician/gynecologists self-identified as PCPs see younger patients (mean age 38.3 p < 0.01), primarily for preventive care (54.0 %, p < 0.01). Quality of care for cardiovascular disease was better in visits to cardiologists than in visits to generalists, but was similar or better in visits to generalists compared to visits to other medical specialists. CONCLUSIONS: Medical specialists are less frequently serving as PCPs for their patients over time. Generalist, medical specialist, and obstetrician/gynecologist PCPs serve different primary care roles for different populations. Delivery redesign efforts must account for the evolving role of generalist and specialist PCPs in the delivery of primary care.


Assuntos
Clínicos Gerais , Visita a Consultório Médico , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Especialização , Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Doença Crônica/terapia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Clínicos Gerais/normas , Clínicos Gerais/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Visita a Consultório Médico/estatística & dados numéricos , Visita a Consultório Médico/tendências , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/métodos , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/normas , Médicos de Atenção Primária/classificação , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/tendências , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Especialização/normas , Especialização/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Recursos Humanos
3.
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol ; 119(4): 376-80, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27098169

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to measure the validity of the prescriber information recorded in the Danish National Prescription Registry (DNPR). The prescriber information recorded in the pharmacies' electronic dispensing system was considered to represent the prescriber information recorded in the DNPR. Further, the problem of validity of the prescriber information pertains only to non-electronic prescriptions, as these are manually entered into the dispensing system. The recorded prescriber information was thus validated against information from a total of 2000 non-electronic prescriptions at five Danish community pharmacies. The validity of the recorded prescriber information was measured at the level of the individual prescriber and the prescriber type, respectively. The proportion of non-electronic prescriptions with incorrect registrations was 22.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 20.6-24.3) when considering individual prescriber identifiers and 17.8% (95% CI: 16.1-19.5) when considering prescriber type. When excluding prescriptions specifically registered as 'missing prescriber identifier', the proportions decreased to 9.5% (95% CI: 8.2-11.0) and 4.1% (95% CI: 3.2-5.1), respectively. The positive predictive values for the classification of prescriber types were in the range of 94.0-99.2%, while the sensitivity ranged between 64.6% and 91.8%. With a maximum of 14% non-electronic prescriptions of all prescriptions in the DNPR in 2015, this corresponds to correct classification of prescriber types in the DNPR of at least 97.5%. In conclusion, the prescriber information in the DNPR was found to be valid, especially in recent years. Researchers should be aware of the low sensitivity towards prescriptions from private practicing specialists.


Assuntos
Confiabilidade dos Dados , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Prescrição Eletrônica , Médicos , Dinamarca , Odontólogos/classificação , Humanos , Registro Médico Coordenado , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/classificação , Informações Pessoalmente Identificáveis , Farmácias , Médicos/classificação , Médicos de Atenção Primária/classificação , Prática Privada , Registros/normas , Sistema de Registros , Especialização
4.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 4(3): 216-9, 2013 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23799710

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Although the intrauterine device (IUD) may be safely used in adolescents, few US adolescents use IUDs. Increasing IUD use in adolescents can decrease pregnancy rates. Primary care providers' clinical practices many be one of the many barriers to increasing adolescents access to IUDs. We explored primary care physicians' (PCPs) approaches to contraception counseling with adolescents, focusing on their views about who would be appropriate IUD candidates. METHODS: Phone interviews were conducted with 28 urban family physicians, pediatricians, and obstetrician-gynecologists. Using standard qualitative techniques, we developed coding template and applied codes. RESULTS: Most respondents have a patient-centered general contraceptive counseling approach. However, when considering IUDs many PCPs describe more paternalistic counseling. For example, although many respondents believe adolescents' primary concern is pregnancy prevention, many PCPs prioritize sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention and thus would not offer an IUD. Attributes PCPs associate with an appropriate IUD candidate include responsibility, reliability, maturity, and monogamy. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that when considering IUDs for adolescents some PCPs' subjective assessment of adolescent sexual behavior, attitudes about STI risk factors and use of overly restrictive IUD eligibility criteria impede adolescent's IUD access. Education around best practices may be insufficient to counterbalance attitudes concerning adolescent sexuality and STI risk; there is also a need to identify and discuss PCPs potential biases or assumptions affecting contraception counseling.


Assuntos
Comportamento do Adolescente , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Dispositivos Intrauterinos/tendências , Médicos de Atenção Primária/psicologia , Gravidez na Adolescência/prevenção & controle , Comportamento Sexual , Adolescente , Feminino , Ginecologia/normas , Ginecologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Dispositivos Intrauterinos/normas , Dispositivos Intrauterinos/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Pediatria/normas , Pediatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos de Família/psicologia , Médicos de Família/normas , Médicos de Família/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos de Atenção Primária/classificação , Médicos de Atenção Primária/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos
6.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 23(6): 762-9, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21057072

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine factors that influence career satisfaction of 3 types of primary care physicians (PCPs): internal medicine (IM) physicians, family/general medicine (FGM) physicians, and pediatricians. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the Center for Studying Health System Change's 2008 Health Tracking Physician Survey. Regression analysis was done to examine the impact of environmental-, practice quality-, compensation-, and demographic-related factors on career satisfaction of IM physicians (n = 504), FGM physicians (n = 693), and pediatricians (n = 363). RESULTS: Nineteen percent of PCPs have been practicing for ≥30 years. Pediatricians had the highest career satisfaction. Although the threat of malpractice lawsuits significantly lowered career satisfaction (ß = -0.177, -0.153, and -0.146), patient interaction (ß = 0.242, 0.321, and 0.346) and income (ß = 0.132, 0.151, and 0.170) significantly increased career satisfaction of IM physicians, FGM physicians, and pediatricians, respectively. Ownership significantly lowered career satisfaction of IM physicians and pediatricians (ß = -0.168 and -0.114, respectively). Inadequate quality care significantly lowered career satisfaction of pediatricians (ß = -0.102). The 3 regression models accounted for only 16% (IM physicians), 17% (FGM physicians), and 21% (pediatricians) of the variance in career satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Steps like giving adequate time for interaction with patients, reducing potential threats of malpractice lawsuits, and improving income may increase PCPs' career satisfaction.


Assuntos
Satisfação no Emprego , Médicos de Atenção Primária/psicologia , Coleta de Dados , Pesquisa Empírica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Médicos de Atenção Primária/classificação , Análise de Regressão , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA