Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 637
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JAMA ; 329(15): 1283-1289, 2023 04 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37071095

RESUMO

Importance: The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 authorizes Medicare to negotiate prices of top-selling drugs based on several factors, including therapeutic benefit compared with existing treatment options. Objective: To determine the added therapeutic benefit of the 50 top-selling brand-name drugs in Medicare in 2020, as assessed by health technology assessment (HTA) organizations in Canada, France, and Germany. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study, publicly available therapeutic benefit ratings, US Food and Drug Administration documents, and the Medicare Part B and Part D prescription drug spending dashboards were used to determine the 50 top-selling single-source drugs used in Medicare in 2020 and to assess their added therapeutic benefit ratings through 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Ratings from HTA bodies in Canada, France, and Germany were categorized as high (moderate or greater) or low (minor or no) added benefit. Each drug was rated based on its most favorable rating across countries, indications, subpopulations, and dosage forms. We compared the use and prerebate and postrebate (ie, net) Medicare spending between drugs with high vs low added benefit. Results: Forty-nine drugs (98%) received an HTA rating by at least 1 country; 22 of 36 drugs (61%) received a low added benefit rating in Canada, 34 of 47 in France (72%), and 17 of 29 in Germany (59%). Across countries, 27 drugs (55%) had a low added therapeutic rating, accounting for $19.3 billion in annual estimated net spending, or 35% of Medicare net spending on the 50 top-selling single-source drugs and 11% of total Medicare net prescription drug spending in 2020. Compared with those with high added benefit, drugs with a low added therapeutic rating were used by more Medicare beneficiaries (median 387 149 vs 44 869) and had lower net spending per beneficiary (median $992 vs $32 287). Conclusions and Relevance: Many top-selling Medicare drugs received low added benefit ratings by the national HTA organizations of Canada, France, and Germany. When negotiating prices for these drugs, Medicare should ensure they are not priced higher than reasonable therapeutic alternatives.


Assuntos
Custos de Medicamentos , Medicare Part B , Medicare Part D , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Patentes como Assunto , Medicamentos sob Prescrição , Estudos Transversais , Custos de Medicamentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicamentos Genéricos , Gastos em Saúde , Medicare Part B/economia , Medicare Part B/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicare Part D/economia , Medicare Part D/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/economia , Estados Unidos , Canadá , França , Alemanha
2.
N Engl J Med ; 373(13): 1185-7, 2015 Sep 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26398067

RESUMO

Medicare's new payment system reflects the movement toward value-based payment, which is built on the view that we can contain costs only by eliminating fee-for-service payment. But there are important problems with this belief and the reforms it inspires.


Assuntos
Medicare Part B/economia , Médicos/economia , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Organizações de Assistência Responsáveis , Medicare Part B/legislação & jurisprudência , Mecanismo de Reembolso/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos
3.
N Engl J Med ; 373(13): 1187-9, 2015 Sep 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26398068

RESUMO

With the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System, Medicare shifts from payment based on macroeconomic indicators to relying on physician- or group-level indicators of cost and quality--and could create a large fee differential between high- and low-performing physicians.


Assuntos
Medicare Part B/economia , Médicos/economia , Reembolso de Incentivo , Medicare Part B/legislação & jurisprudência , Mecanismo de Reembolso/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos
5.
Fed Regist ; 83(216): 55626-32, 2018 Nov 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30456937

RESUMO

The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) changed the modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) ranges associated with Medicare Part B and Medicare prescription drug coverage premiums for years beginning in 2018. The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (BBA 2018) revised the MAGI ranges again for years beginning with 2019. We consider a beneficiary's MAGI and tax filing status to determine: The percentage of the unsubsidized Medicare Part B premium that the beneficiary must pay; and the percentage of the cost of basic Medicare prescription drug coverage the beneficiary must pay. This final rule makes our regulations consistent with the MAGI ranges specified by MACRA and BBA 2018.


Assuntos
Renda , Seguro de Serviços Farmacêuticos/economia , Medicare Part B/economia , Humanos , Seguro de Serviços Farmacêuticos/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicare Part B/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos
6.
Fed Regist ; 83(149): 37747-50, 2018 Aug 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30074737

RESUMO

This document announces the extension of statewide temporary moratoria on the enrollment of new Medicare Part B non-emergency ground ambulance providers and suppliers and Medicare home health agencies and branch locations in Florida, Illinois, Michigan, Texas, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey, as applicable, to prevent and combat fraud, waste, and abuse. This extension also applies to the enrollment of new non- emergency ground ambulance suppliers and home health agencies and branch locations in Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program in those states.


Assuntos
Ambulâncias/legislação & jurisprudência , Children's Health Insurance Program/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicaid/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicare Part B/legislação & jurisprudência , Transporte de Pacientes/legislação & jurisprudência , Criança , Fraude/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Estados Unidos
7.
Fed Regist ; 83(161): 42037-43, 2018 Aug 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30198670

RESUMO

This document announces revisions to the Provider Enrollment Moratoria Access Waiver Demonstration (PEWD) for Part B Non-Emergency Ground Ambulance Suppliers and Home Health Agencies. The demonstration was implemented in accordance with section 402(a)(1)(J) of the Social Security Amendments of 1967 and, as revised, gives CMS the authority to grant waivers to the statewide enrollment moratoria on a case-by-case basis in response to access to care issues and previously denied enrollment applications because of statewide moratoria implementation, and to subject providers and suppliers enrolling via such waivers to heightened screening, oversight, and investigations.


Assuntos
Ambulâncias/legislação & jurisprudência , Children's Health Insurance Program/legislação & jurisprudência , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicaid/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicare Part B/legislação & jurisprudência , Transporte de Pacientes/legislação & jurisprudência , Fraude/prevenção & controle , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Estados Unidos
8.
Fed Regist ; 83(20): 4147-51, 2018 Jan 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29461022

RESUMO

This document announces the extension of statewide temporary moratoria on the enrollment of new Medicare Part B non-emergency ground ambulance providers and suppliers and Medicare home health agencies, subunits, and branch locations in Florida, Illinois, Michigan, Texas, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey, as applicable, to prevent and combat fraud, waste, and abuse. This extension also applies to the enrollment of new non-emergency ground ambulance suppliers and home health agencies, subunits, and branch locations in Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program in those states. For purposes of these moratoria, providers that were participating as network providers in one or more Medicaid managed care organizations prior to January 1, 2018 will not be considered "newly enrolling" when they are required to enroll with the State Medicaid agency pursuant to a new statutory requirement, and thus will not be subject to the moratoria.


Assuntos
Ambulâncias/economia , Ambulâncias/legislação & jurisprudência , Fraude/prevenção & controle , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/economia , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicare Part B/economia , Medicare Part B/legislação & jurisprudência , Criança , Serviços de Saúde da Criança , Humanos , Governo Estadual , Estados Unidos
9.
Fed Regist ; 83(249): 67816-8082, 2018 12 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30596411

RESUMO

Under the Medicare Shared Savings Program (Shared Savings Program), providers of services and suppliers that participate in an Accountable Care Organization (ACO) continue to receive traditional Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) payments under Parts A and B, but the ACO may be eligible to receive a shared savings payment if it meets specified quality and savings requirements. The policies included in this final rule provide a new direction for the Shared Savings Program by establishing pathways to success through redesigning the participation options available under the program to encourage ACOs to transition to two-sided models (in which they may share in savings and are accountable for repaying shared losses). These policies are designed to increase savings for the Trust Funds and mitigate losses, reduce gaming opportunities, and promote regulatory flexibility and free-market principles. This final rule also provides new tools to support coordination of care across settings and strengthen beneficiary engagement; and ensure rigorous benchmarking. In this final rule, we also respond to public comments we received on the extreme and uncontrollable circumstances policies for the Shared Savings Program that were used to assess the quality and financial performance of ACOs that were subject to extreme and uncontrollable events, such as Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria, and the California wildfires, in performance year 2017, including the applicable quality data reporting period for performance year 2017.


Assuntos
Organizações de Assistência Responsáveis/economia , Redução de Custos/economia , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado/economia , Medicare Part A/economia , Medicare Part B/economia , Medicare/economia , Organizações de Assistência Responsáveis/legislação & jurisprudência , Benchmarking , Redução de Custos/legislação & jurisprudência , Desastres , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado/tendências , Previsões , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Medicare/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicare Part A/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicare Part B/legislação & jurisprudência , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos
11.
Fed Regist ; 82(144): 35122-5, 2017 Jul 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28753258

RESUMO

This document announces the extension of statewide temporary moratoria on the enrollment of new Medicare Part B non-emergency ground ambulance providers and suppliers and Medicare home health agencies, subunits, and branch locations in Florida, Illinois, Michigan, Texas, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey, as applicable, to prevent and combat fraud, waste, and abuse. This extension also applies to the enrollment of new non-emergency ground ambulance suppliers and home health agencies, subunits, and branch locations in Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program in those states.


Assuntos
Ambulâncias/legislação & jurisprudência , Serviços de Saúde da Criança/legislação & jurisprudência , Fraude/legislação & jurisprudência , Fraude/prevenção & controle , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/legislação & jurisprudência , Seguro Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicaid/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicare Part B/legislação & jurisprudência , Criança , Florida , Humanos , Illinois , Michigan , New Jersey , Pennsylvania , Texas , Estados Unidos
12.
Fed Regist ; 82(219): 52976-3371, 2017 Nov 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29231695

RESUMO

This major final rule addresses changes to the Medicare physician fee schedule (PFS) and other Medicare Part B payment policies such as changes to the Medicare Shared Savings Program, to ensure that our payment systems are updated to reflect changes in medical practice and the relative value of services, as well as changes in the statute. In addition, this final rule includes policies necessary to begin offering the expanded Medicare Diabetes Prevention Program model.


Assuntos
Redução de Custos/economia , Tabela de Remuneração de Serviços/economia , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/economia , Medicare Part B/economia , Medicare/economia , Sistema de Pagamento Prospectivo/economia , Redução de Custos/legislação & jurisprudência , Current Procedural Terminology , Diabetes Mellitus/economia , Diabetes Mellitus/prevenção & controle , Tabela de Remuneração de Serviços/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicare/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicare Part B/legislação & jurisprudência , Sistema de Pagamento Prospectivo/legislação & jurisprudência , Sistemas de Informação em Radiologia/economia , Sistemas de Informação em Radiologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Escalas de Valor Relativo , Estados Unidos
13.
Fed Regist ; 82(1): 180-651, 2017 01 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28071874

RESUMO

This final rule implements three new Medicare Parts A and B episode payment models, a Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) Incentive Payment model and modifications to the existing Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement model under section 1115A of the Social Security Act. Acute care hospitals in certain selected geographic areas will participate in retrospective episode payment models targeting care for Medicare fee-forservice beneficiaries receiving services during acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, and surgical hip/femur fracture treatment episodes. All related care within 90 days of hospital discharge will be included in the episode of care. We believe these models will further our goals of improving the efficiency and quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries receiving care for these common clinical conditions and procedures.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/economia , Reabilitação Cardíaca/economia , Assistência Integral à Saúde/economia , Cuidado Periódico , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/economia , Medicare Part A/economia , Medicare Part B/economia , Pacotes de Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Reembolso de Incentivo/legislação & jurisprudência , Assistência Integral à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/economia , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/reabilitação , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicare Part A/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicare Part B/legislação & jurisprudência , Modelos Econômicos , Infarto do Miocárdio/economia , Infarto do Miocárdio/reabilitação , Estados Unidos
14.
Fed Regist ; 81(220): 80170-562, 2016 Nov 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27906531

RESUMO

This major final rule addresses changes to the physician fee schedule and other Medicare Part B payment policies, such as changes to the Value Modifier, to ensure that our payment systems are updated to reflect changes in medical practice and the relative value of services, as well as changes in the statute. This final rule also includes changes related to the Medicare Shared Savings Program, requirements for Medicare Advantage Provider Networks, and provides for the release of certain pricing data from Medicare Advantage bids and of data from medical loss ratio reports submitted by Medicare health and drug plans. In addition, this final rule expands the Medicare Diabetes Prevention Program model.


Assuntos
Tabela de Remuneração de Serviços/economia , Tabela de Remuneração de Serviços/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicare Part B/economia , Medicare Part B/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicare Part C/economia , Medicare Part C/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicare Part D/economia , Medicare Part D/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicare/economia , Medicare/legislação & jurisprudência , Sistema de Pagamento Prospectivo/economia , Sistema de Pagamento Prospectivo/legislação & jurisprudência , Redução de Custos , Diabetes Mellitus/economia , Diabetes Mellitus/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Estados Unidos
15.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 55(2): 203-7, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25749265

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare legislation at the federal level that would recognize pharmacists as health care providers under Medicare Part B with similar state-level efforts in an attempt to identify the strengths and weaknesses of these options and forecast outcomes. SUMMARY: The current primary care provider shortage poses a significant threat to public health in the United States. The effort to achieve federal provider status for pharmacists, currently in the form of identical bills introduced in January 2015 into the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate as the Pharmacy and Medically Underserved Areas Enhancement Act (H.R. 592 and S. 314), would amend the Social Security Act to recognize pharmacists as health care providers in sections of Medicare Part B that specify coverage and reimbursement. This action has budgetary implications owing to the compensation that would accrue to pharmacists caring for Medicare beneficiaries. Passage of these bills into law could improve public health by sustainably increasing access to pharmacists' patient care services in medically underserved areas. In this article, the legislation's strengths and weaknesses are analyzed. The resulting information may be used to forecast the bills' fate as well as plan strategies to help support their success. Comparison of the bills with existing, state-level efforts is used as a framework for such policy analysis. CONCLUSION: While the current political climate benefits the bills in the U.S. Congress, established legislative precedents suggest that parts of H.R. 592/S. 314, specifically those regarding compensation mechanisms, may require negotiated amendment to improve their chances of success.


Assuntos
Governo Federal , Regulamentação Governamental , Medicare Part B/legislação & jurisprudência , Assistência Farmacêutica/legislação & jurisprudência , Farmacêuticos/legislação & jurisprudência , Orçamentos , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Medicare Part B/economia , Assistência Farmacêutica/economia , Farmacêuticos/economia , Formulação de Políticas , Estados Unidos
16.
Fed Regist ; 80(30): 7975-7, 2015 Feb 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25735052

RESUMO

This document announces a CMS Ruling that states the CMS policies for implementing United States v. Windsor ("Windsor''), in which the Supreme Court held that section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), enacted in 1996, is unconstitutional. Section 3 of DOMA defined ``marriage'' and "spouse'' as excluding same-sex marriages and same-sex spouses, and effectively precluded the Federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages and spouses.


Assuntos
Homossexualidade , Casamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicare Part A/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicare Part B/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Decisões da Suprema Corte , Estados Unidos
17.
Fed Regist ; 80(220): 70885-1386, 2015 Nov 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26571548

RESUMO

This major final rule with comment period addresses changes to the physician fee schedule, and other Medicare Part B payment policies to ensure that our payment systems are updated to reflect changes in medical practice and the relative value of services, as well as changes in the statute.


Assuntos
Tabela de Remuneração de Serviços/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicare Part B/economia , Medicare Part B/legislação & jurisprudência , Sistema de Pagamento Prospectivo/economia , Sistema de Pagamento Prospectivo/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Escalas de Valor Relativo , Estados Unidos
18.
Fed Regist ; 80(226): 73273-554, 2015 Nov 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26606762

RESUMO

This final rule implements a new Medicare Part A and B payment model under section 1115A of the Social Security Act, called the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model, in which acute care hospitals in certain selected geographic areas will receive retrospective bundled payments for episodes of care for lower extremity joint replacement (LEJR) or reattachment of a lower extremity. All related care within 90 days of hospital discharge from the joint replacement procedure will be included in the episode of care. We believe this model will further our goals in improving the efficiency and quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries with these common medical procedures.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Substituição/economia , Assistência Integral à Saúde/economia , Medicare Part A/economia , Medicare Part B/economia , Sistema de Pagamento Prospectivo/economia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economia , Assistência Integral à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Economia Hospitalar/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Medicare Part A/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicare Part B/legislação & jurisprudência , Sistema de Pagamento Prospectivo/legislação & jurisprudência , Mecanismo de Reembolso/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos
19.
Int J Health Care Finance Econ ; 14(2): 95-108, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24366366

RESUMO

The traditional Medicare fee-for-service program may be able to purchase clinical laboratory test services at a lower cost through competitive bidding. Demonstrations of competitive bidding for clinical laboratory tests have been twice mandated or authorized by Congress but never implemented. This article provides a summary and review of the final design of the laboratory competitive bidding demonstration mandated by the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003. The design was analogous to a sealed bid (first price), clearing price auction. Design elements presented include covered laboratory tests and beneficiaries, laboratory bidding and payment status under the demonstration, composite bids, determining bidding winners and the demonstration fee schedule, and quality under the demonstration. Expanded use of competitive bidding in Medicare, including specifically for clinical laboratory tests, has been recommended in some proposals for Medicare reform. The presented design may be a useful point of departure if Medicare clinical laboratory competitive bidding is revived in the future.


Assuntos
Serviços de Laboratório Clínico/economia , Proposta de Concorrência/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Medicare Part B/economia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economia , Serviços de Laboratório Clínico/legislação & jurisprudência , Proposta de Concorrência/legislação & jurisprudência , Proposta de Concorrência/métodos , Controle de Custos/legislação & jurisprudência , Controle de Custos/métodos , Tabela de Remuneração de Serviços/economia , Tabela de Remuneração de Serviços/legislação & jurisprudência , Tabela de Remuneração de Serviços/tendências , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Medicare Part B/legislação & jurisprudência , Mecanismo de Reembolso/legislação & jurisprudência , Mecanismo de Reembolso/tendências , Estados Unidos
20.
Fed Regist ; 79(41): 11706, 2014 Mar 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24611211

RESUMO

This final rule adopts, without change, the interim final rule with request for comments we published in the Federal Register on September 18, 2013. The interim final rule modified our rules regarding Medicare Part B income-related monthly adjustment amounts to conform to changes made to the Social Security Act (Act) and Internal Revenue Code by the Affordable Care Act. We also removed provisions that phased in income-related monthly adjustment amounts between 2007 and 2009 and updated a citation to reflect the transfer of authority for hearing appeals under title XVIII of the Act from the Social Security Administration to the Department of Health and Human Services.


Assuntos
Medicare Part B/economia , Humanos , Renda , Imposto de Renda , Medicare Part B/legislação & jurisprudência , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Previdência Social/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA