Pre-treatment expectations of patients with spinal metastases: what do we know and what can we learn from other disciplines? A systematic review of qualitative studies.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about treatment expectations of patients with spinal metastases undergoing radiotherapy and/or surgery. Assuming that patients with spinal metastases share characteristics with patients who had spinal surgery for non-cancer related conditions and with advanced cancer patients, we performed a systematic review to summarize the literature on patient expectations regarding treatment outcomes of spinal surgery and advanced cancer care. METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO for studies between 2000 and sep-2019. Studies including adult patients (> 18 years), undergoing spinal surgery or receiving advanced cancer care, investigating patients' pre-treatment expectations regarding treatment outcomes were included. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts and full-texts, extracted data and assessed methodological quality. RESULTS: The search identified 7343 articles, of which 92 were selected for full-text review. For this review, 31 articles were included. Patients undergoing spinal surgery had overly optimistic expectations regarding pain and symptom relief, they underestimated the probability of functional disability, and overestimated the probability of (complete) recovery and return to work. Studies highlighted that patients feel not adequately prepared for surgery in terms of post-treatment expectations. Similarly, advanced cancer patients receiving palliative treatment often had overly optimistic expectations regarding their survival probability and cure rates. CONCLUSIONS: Patients tend to have overly optimistic expectations regarding pain and symptom relief, recovery and prognosis following spinal surgery or advanced cancer care. Pretreatment consultation about the expected pain and symptom relief, recovery and prognosis may improve understanding of prognosis, and promote and manage expectations, which, in turn, may lead to better perceived outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020145151 .

Quality of life, pain, and psychological factors in patients undergoing surgery for primary tumors of the spine.

PURPOSE: Knowledge about quality of life (QOL), pain, and psychological factors in patients with primary tumors of the spine is limited, but is important in planning rehabilitation after surgery. Aims of this study were to assess the preoperative levels and improvement after surgery of these factors, and to identify the predictors of postoperative pain and QOL. METHODS: Patients with primary tumors undergoing spine surgery were matched for sex and age with patients with metastatic tumors. QOL was measured at baseline and three months after surgery with the physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) components SF-12 subscales, pain intensity with a numeric rating scale (NRS), depression with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Preoperative SF-12, NRS, and BDI levels and differences in follow-up improvement in SF-12 and NRS were compared across samples. LASSO regressions were performed to find predictors of follow-up SF-12 and NRS. RESULTS: Patients with primary tumors showed better PCS and NRS, and similar BDI and MCS than patients with metastatic tumors. At follow-up, they showed stronger improvement in the MCS and no improvement in the PCS. All QOL scores were below those of the general population. Follow-up PCS was predicted by baseline PCS and BDI; MCS by baseline MCS; pain intensity by baseline pain intensity and BDI. CONCLUSION: Patients with primary tumors of the spine suffer from moderate levels of physical and mental impairment. Depression influences surgical outcomes.

Survival, local control, and health-related quality of life in patients with oligometastatic and polymetastatic spinal tumors: A multicenter, international study.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of oligometastatic (≤5 metastases) spinal disease has trended toward ablative therapies, yet to the authors' knowledge little is known regarding the prognosis of patients presenting with oligometastatic spinal disease and the value of this approach. The objective of the current study was to compare the survival and clinical outcomes of patients with cancer with oligometastatic spinal disease with those of patients with polymetastatic (>5 metastases) disease. METHODS: The current study was an international, multicenter, prospective study. Patients who were admitted to a participating spine center with a diagnosis of spinal metastases and who underwent surgical intervention and/or radiotherapy between August 2013 and May 2017 were included. Data collected included demographics, overall survival, local control, and treatment information including surgical, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy details. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures included the EuroQOL 5 dimensions 3-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L), the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36v2), and the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSGOQ). RESULTS: Of the 393 patients included in the current study, 215 presented with oligometastatic disease and 178 presented with polymetastatic disease. A significant survival advantage of 90.1% versus 77.3% at 3 months and 77.0% versus 65.1% at 6 months from the time of treatment was found for patients presenting with oligometastatic disease compared with those with polymetastatic disease. It is important to note that both groups experienced significant improvements in multiple HRQOL measures at 6 months after treatment, with no differences in these outcome measures noted between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of oligometastatic disease appears to offer a significant survival advantage compared with polymetastatic disease, regardless of treatment choice. HRQOL measures were found to improve in both groups, demonstrating a palliative benefit for all treated patients.

Psychometric evaluation and adaptation of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire to evaluate health-related quality of life in patients with spinal metastases.

BACKGROUND: The Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSGOQ) was developed as the first spine oncology-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measure. This study evaluated the psychometric properties and clinical validity of the SOSGOQ in a diverse cohort of patients with spinal metastases. METHODS: An international, multicenter, prospective observational cohort study including patients with spinal metastases who underwent surgery and/or radiotherapy was conducted by the AOSpine Knowledge Forum Tumor. Demographic, tumor, and treatment data were collected. HRQOL was evaluated using the SOSGOQ and Medical Outcomes Study Questionnaire Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) at baseline and fixed follow-up times. Construct validity was assessed using multitrait scaling analyses, confirmatory factor analyses, and correlation with the SF-36 and NRS pain score. Test-retest reliability was assessed in a subgroup of patients between 12 weeks after treatment and the retest 4 to 9 days later. RESULTS: A total of 238 patients were enrolled at 9 centers across North America; 153 of these patients had HRQOL data available at 12 weeks after treatment. Multitrait scaling analyses and confirmatory factor analyses resulted in a refined version of the SOSGOQ with 4 domains and 4 single items. The revised SOSGOQ (SOSGOQ2.0) demonstrated strong correlations with SF-36 and the ability to discriminate between clinically distinct patient groups. Reliability of the SOSGOQ2.0 was demonstrated to be good, with an intraclass correlation coefficient ranging from 0.58 to 0.92 for the different domains. CONCLUSIONS: The SOSGOQ2.0 is a reliable and valid measure with which to evaluate HRQOL in patients with spinal metastases. It is recommended to use the SOSGOQ2.0 together with a generic HRQOL outcome measure to comprehensively assess HRQOL and increase sensitivity and specificity. Cancer 2018;124:1828-38. © 2018 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Quality of life after different surgical procedures for the treatment of spinal metastases: results of a single-center prospective case series.

OBJECTIVE The performance of surgery for spinal metastases is rapidly increasing. Different surgical procedures, ranging from stabilization alone to stabilization combined with corpectomy, are thereby performed for various indications. Little is known about the impact of these different procedures on patient quality of life (QOL), but this factor is crucial when discussing the various therapeutic options with patients and their families. Thus, the authors of this study investigated the effect of various surgical procedures for spinal metastases on patient QOL. METHODS The authors prospectively followed a cohort of 113 patients with spinal metastases who were referred to their clinic for surgical evaluation between July 2012 and July 2014. Quality of life was assessed using the EQ-5D at intake and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after treatment. RESULTS Nineteen patients were treated conservatively, 41 underwent decompressive surgery with or without stabilization, 47 underwent a piecemeal corpectomy procedure with stabilization and expandable cage reconstruction, and 6 had a stabilization procedure without decompression. Among all surgical patients, the mean EQ-5D score was significantly increased from 0.44 pretreatment to 0.59 at 3 months after treatment (p < 0.001). Mean EQ-5D scores at 1 year after surgery further increased to 0.84 following decompression with stabilization, 0.74 after corpectomy with stabilization, and 0.94 after stabilization without decompression. Frankel scores also improved after surgery. There were no significant differences in improvements in EQ-5D scores and Frankel grades among the different surgical procedures. In addition, mortality and complication rates were similar. CONCLUSIONS Quality of life can improve significantly after various extensive and less extensive surgical procedures in patients with spinal metastases. The relatively invasive corpectomy procedure, as compared with alternative less invasive techniques, does not negatively affect outcome.

Clinical curative effect of percutaneous vertebroplasty combined with 125I-seed implantation in treating spinal metastatic tumor.

This paper selected and studied 15 in-hospital patients to analyze and discuss the clinical curative effect of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) combined with (125)I-seed implantation in treating spinal metastatic tumor. The evaluation of clinical curative effects was based on the observation of several factors, namely recovery conditions of vertebral body's leading edge and middle section before and after surgery, improvements of kyphosis Cobb angle, visual analog scale (VAS), and Barthel Index (BI). The paper found significant difference between preoperative VAS and postoperative VAS, and the same situation occurred to BI. However, compared to the loss rate of vertebral body's leading edge and middle section and the improvement of Cobb angle before operative, postoperative loss rate and Cobb angle did not show statistical difference. Thus the conclusion is that PVP combined with (125)I-seed implantation is a minimally invasive surgery for effectively treating spinal metastatic tumor, which does well in rapidly releasing pains, improving patients' daily life activities and life qualities.

Evaluation and treatment of spinal metastatic disease.

With the increased survival of oncologic patients, evaluation and management of patients with spinal metastasis is crucial to reducing morbidity and maximizing function. In this chapter, we present some guidelines for the initial systematic evaluation of patients with spinal lesions, as well as the risks, benefits, and alternatives to nonoperative and operative management of metastatic spinal disease, and the overall survival of these patients.

Quality-of-life outcomes in metastatic spinal cord compression: findings from the SCORAD trial.

PURPOSE: This article reports detailed quality-of-life data including preferred and actual place of care from SCORAD, the only large prospective randomized trial in metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). METHODS: SCORAD compared 2 doses of radiotherapy in patients with MSCC: 8 Gy single fraction and 20 Gy in 5 fractions. In total, 686 patients were randomized, of whom 590 had Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) data collected at baseline and at least 1 later time point. HRQoL was measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 supplemented with the QLU-C10D and data on place of care at weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 postrandomization. Quality-of-Life Adjusted Survival was computed by multiplying Kaplan-Meier survival probabilities with the UK utility weights obtained from the QLU-C10D. RESULTS: Patients with a baseline physical functioning score of above 50 demonstrated a 28% reduction in the risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.72, 99% confidence interval [CI] = 0.54 to 0.95; P = .003). An increased risk of death was associated with fatigue (HR = 1.35, 99% CI = 1.03 to 1.76; P = .0040), dyspnea (HR = 1.61, 99% CI = 1.24 to 2.08; P < .001), and appetite loss (HR = 1.25, 99% CI = 0.99 to 1.59; P = .014). The preferred place of care for the majority was at home or with relatives (61%-74% across the 12 weeks) but achieved by only 53% at 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged survival in patients with MSCC was associated with better HRQoL. More than 60% of patients preferred to be cared for at home or with relatives, but only half were able to achieve this. There was no difference in HRQoL between the multifraction and single-fraction groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN97555949 and ISRCTN97108008.

Reversible delirium in an advanced cancer patient.

Delirium is still one of the most common and distressing symptoms in palliative care patients. Causes and pathophysiology of this neuropsychiatric dysfunction are multifactorial. Recent studies indicate that the interaction of special triggers facilitates development of delirium. Some of them are reversible. This case report presents a reversible delirium in an advanced cancer patient and offers a list of possible delirogen medications. This list might be useful to prevent delirium, particularly in older people.

Meeting the needs of Somali patients at the end of life.

Given the large number of Somali refugees living in Minnesota, it is likely that Minnesota physicians will encounter Somali patients, some of whom will have serious illnesses. Although our knowledge of Somali expectations about health care is growing, little has been written about the Somali people's views of treatment for life-threatening illnesses or their ideas about end-of-life care. After encountering a Somali man with advanced cancer in our practice, we attempted to learn about the Somali view of death and dying and the kind of treatment Somali patients might want during their final days. We share what we learned so that others might provide more culturally competent end-of-life care for Somali patients in the future.

Evaluation of surgical management of primary spinal tumours.

Spinal tumours, which are 5-10% of skeletal tumours, cause considerable morbidity and present challenging situations in their management. Surgery is often used in the treatment of spinal tumours. Now a day only few specialized spinal care centers have developed in Bangladesh. The prospective study regarding surgical management of primary spinal tumour might be beneficial for proper planning and patient management. All patients who underwent surgical resection of a primary tumor of the spine between July 2006 and May 2008, at the Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh. Patients were uniformly staged before surgery and baseline demographic and surgical variables were recorded, as well as an evaluation of general health related quality of life were done. Thirty-two patients (16 males and 16 females) were eligible for the study. Average age was 43.25 (range 15 to 85). There were 8(25%) vertebral body and pedicle tumors and 3(9.37%) extradural, 16(50%) intradural-extramedullary and 05(15.67%) intradural intramedullary. Only 5(15.63%) developed complication. In this series out of 32 patients, 15(46.88%) achieved excellent result and 10(31.25%) got good result and 5(15.5%) achieved fair and remaining 2(6.25%) patients achieved poor results after the management. Complete neurological involvement of patient did not show complete recovery. In addition to surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy are needed to sterilize the tumour bed. Early detection and surgery of primary spinal tumour give satisfactory results and patient can return to their normal life.

A Personalized Medicine Approach for the Management of Spinal Metastases with Cord Compression: Development of a Novel Clinical Prediction Model for Postoperative Survival and Quality of Life.

Surgery should be considered for patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) with a life expectancy of ≥3 months. Given the heterogeneity of the clinical presentation and outcomes, clinical prognostic models (CPMs) can assist in tailoring a personalized medicine approach to optimize surgical decision-making. We aimed to develop and internally validate the first CPM of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and a novel CPM to predict the survival of patients with MESCC treated surgically. Using data from 258 patients (AOSpine North America MESCC study and Nottingham MESCC registry), we created 1-year survival and HRQoL CPMs using a Cox model and logistic regression analysis with manual backward elimination. The outcome measure for HRQoL was the minimal clinical important difference in EuroQol 5-dimension questionnaire scores. Internal validation involved 200 bootstrap iterations, and calibration and discrimination were evaluated. Longer survival was associated with a higher SF-36 physical component score (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96). In contrast, primary tumor other than breast, thyroid, or prostate (unfavorable: HR, 2.57; other: HR, 1.20), organ metastasis (HR, 1.51), male sex (HR, 1.58), and preoperative radiotherapy (HR, 1.53) were not (c-statistic, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.73). Karnofsky performance status <70% (odds ratio [OR], 2.50), living in North America (OR, 4.06), SF-36 physical component score (OR, 0.95) and SF-36 mental component score (OR, 0.96) were associated with the likelihood of achieving a minimal clinical important difference improvement in the EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire score at 3 months (c-statistic, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.79). The calibration for both CPMs was very good. We developed and internally validated the first CPMs of survival and HRQoL at 3 months postoperatively in patients with MESCC using the TRIPOD (transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis) guidelines. A web-based calculator is available (available at: http://spine-met.com) to assist with clinical decision-making.

Patients' constructions of disability in metastatic spinal cord compression.

Metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) is characterised by poor prognosis and serious physical disability. Patients have complex rehabilitation needs, but the evidence on rehabilitation is sparse. This study aimed to ascertain the constructions placed upon disability by patients with MSCC. The method consisted of a series of nine process-tracing, longitudinal case studies, involving 58 interviews with 9 patients, 6 carers and 29 staff in one National Health Service region. A context-mechanism-outcome configuration was adopted as a conceptual basis for data collection, together with a constant comparative method of data analysis. Patients' orientation to disability incorporated two apparently inconsistent attitudes. Patients acknowledged that their situation had changed and that their future plans would need to accommodate altered circumstances. However, they also resisted the idea of themselves as disabled, wanting to retain an image of themselves as resourceful and resilient. Patients used a number of strategies to reconcile the tension between these two positions. The illusions incorporated into the 'failure to acknowledge' pole of this orientation are self-protective and, like other positive illusions, have psychological benefits. Providing effective and acceptable support to patients living with disability relies on professional responses that are able to sustain patients' sense of their own competence.

An Evaluation of PROMIS in Patients With Primary or Metastatic Spine Tumors.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: In spine tumor patients: i) to assess the correlation of Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), and Depression scores with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores; and ii) to assess ceiling and floor effects of PROMIS PF, PI, and Depression domains and the ODI/NDI. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There remains no widely used patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument for spine tumor patients. PROMIS, a universal PRO tool, may add notable value to patient care. A paucity of work exists comparing PROMIS to legacy PRO tools in primary and metastatic spine tumor patients. METHODS: Patients confirmed to have a primary or metastatic spine tumor were asked to complete PROMIS PF, PI, and Depression domains and either an ODI or NDI questionnaire between May 2015 and December 2017. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were calculated. Ceiling and floor effects were determined. P < 0.05 was significant. RESULTS: Eighty unique visits from 51 patients with spine tumors (44 metastatic/67 visits; 7 primary/13 visits) met our inclusion criteria. A strong correlation existed between PROMIS PI and the ODI/NDI in both primary and metastatic tumor patient subgroups (range, r = 0.75-0.86, P < 0.05). PROMIS PF and the ODI/NDI demonstrated a strong correlation among all patients (r = -0.75, P < 0.05) and in the metastatic disease subgroup (r = -0.78, P < 0.05). A strong correlation existed between PROMIS Depression and the ODI/NDI in the primary tumor subgroup (r = 0.79, P < 0.05). PROMIS Depression demonstrated the largest floor effect (13.6%); there were similar ceiling effects. CONCLUSION: PROMIS PF and PI domains correlate well with the ODI/NDI in spine tumor patients and have a similar ceiling effect but decreased floor effect. PROMIS Depression was not as well captured, except in the primary tumor subgroup. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Long-term complications and quality of life in children with intraspinal tumors.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord compression by pediatric intraspinal tumors may result in persisting neurological deficits. The impact such late effects have on social and psychological adjustment and quality of life has not been documented previously. METHOD: To study the long-term outcome of pediatric patients with intraspinal tumors, we followed 28 consecutive patients under 16 years of age who were treated in a single institution from 1975 to 2005. In 20 of 26 survivors (median follow-up time 8.4 years, range 0.8-31.3 years) who agreed to participate, neurological, orthopedic, and cognitive complications and their impact on behavioral and psychological adjustment, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were comprehensively assessed qualitatively and quantitatively. Primary therapy for spinal cord decompression was surgery in ten patients, chemotherapy in nine, and radiotherapy in one. RESULTS: Tumor control was good (10-year overall survival rate of 96%; 10-year progression-free survival rate of 84%). Persistent neurological complications occurred in 10 (50%) patients (paraparesis, n = 7; monoparesis, n = 3; neurogenic bladder dysfunction, n = 4; neurogenic bowel dysfunction, n = 2). Two of the ten patients with paresis depended on wheelchair. Seven (35%) patients developed scoliosis and six of these required spondylodesis. Survivors reported no major impairments in daily activities and rated their HRQoL only slightly lower than healthy controls. The only statistically significant difference was in emotional functioning. DISCUSSION: Most patients with intraspinal tumors have a good chance of cure. Apart from few patients, especially those with severe neurological complications, self-rated HRQoL is comparable to that of healthy controls.

Clinical results and quality of life after reconstruction following sacrectomy for primary bone malignancy.

BACKGROUND: Sacrectomy is a rare and demanding surgical procedure that results in major soft tissue defects and spinopelvic discontinuity. No consensus is available on the optimal reconstruction algorithm. Therefore, the present study evaluated the results of sacrectomy reconstruction and its impact on patients' quality of life (QOL). METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for 21 patients who underwent sacrectomy for a primary bone tumour. Patients were divided into groups based on the timing of reconstruction as follows: no reconstruction, immediate reconstruction or delayed reconstruction. QOL was measured using the EQ-5D instrument before and after surgery in patients treated in the intensive care unit. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 57 (range 22-81) years. The most common reconstruction was gluteal muscle flap (n = 9) and gluteal fasciocutaneous flap (n = 4). Four patients required free-tissue transfer, three latissimus dorsi flaps and one vascular fibula bone transfer. No free flap losses were noted. The need for unplanned re-operations did not differ between groups (p = 0.397), and no significant differences were found for pre- and post-operative QOL or any of its dimensions. DISCUSSION: Free flap surgery is reliable for reconstructing the largest sacrectomy defects. Even in the most complex cases, surgery can be safely staged, and final reconstruction can be carried out within 1 week of resection surgery without increasing peri­operative complications. Sacrectomy does not have an immoderate effect on the measured QOL.

Are older patients with solitary spinal metastases fit for total en-bloc surgery?

OBJECTIVE: Due to radical resection, total en-bloc spondylectomy (TES) is associated with significant levels of surgical injury and spinal instability, particularly in elderly patients with solitary spinal metastases (SM), whether the possible benefits outweigh the risk requires intense consideration. Our aim was to compare and analyze the impact of age on patient prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study investigated TES in 78 consecutive patients with solitary SM, who were divided into Group A (>65 years, n = 32) and group B (<60 years of age, n = 46). Surgical outcomes were assessed according to survival time, local recurrence, neurological function, pain, and quality of life before and after surgery. Differences between groups were statistically compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) or chi-square tests. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of surgery duration, blood loss, blood transfusion or the duration of hospital stay (p > 0.05). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the median survival time between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, the perioperative complication rate in group A was higher than that in group B (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in terms of local recurrence rate when compared between group A and group B (p > 0.05), and there were no significant differences in terms of improvements in neurological function, Visual Analogue Scale and Karnofsky scores of patients between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Older patients can experience survival and local recurrence rates that were similar to those of younger patients. Although older patients are at increased risk of perioperative complications, this factor does not appear to lead to serious adverse outcomes. Older patients are still good candidates to receive TES to cure solitary SM after careful preparation and strict selection.

Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Spine Stabilization for Spinal Metastases.

The goal of the study was to evaluate minimally invasive palliative surgery and the effect of postoperative adjuvant therapy for metastatic spinal tumor with a limited vital prognosis. Of the 70 patients who underwent palliative surgery for metastatic spinal tumor at the authors' hospital between March 2012 and May 2016, thirty-three were treated with minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt) using percutaneous pedicle screws (PPSs) and included in the current study. Of the 33 patients, 26 were men and 7 were women; mean age at surgery was 68.6 years. Intraoperatively, posterior decompression and fusion was performed in 17 (51.5%) patients and fusion only was performed in 16 (48.5%). Mean operative time was 202.5 minutes, mean intraoperative blood loss was 331.6 mL, and intraoperative blood loss was 1500 mL or greater in 2 (6.1%) patients. Median postoperative survival time determined using the Kaplan-Meier method was 11.0 months (95% confidence interval, 7.3-14.6). Regarding improvement of paralysis, neurological deficit was improved by at least 1 Frankel grade for 15 (45.5%) patients, and the number of ambulatory patients increased from 22 (66.7%) to 25 (75.8%). Postoperative adjuvant therapy included chemotherapy in 17 (51.5%) patients, radiotherapy in 21 (63.6%), and bone-modifying agent treatment in 25 (75.8%). The mean Barthel Index for activities of daily living improved from 53.5 preoperatively to 71.5 postoperatively. Discharge to home was possible for 23 (69.7%) patients. Activities of daily living for patients with metastatic spinal tumor were improved by minimally invasive palliative surgery with MISt using PPSs and postoperative adjuvant therapy. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(4):e693-e698.].

A Cross-sectional Study on the Symptom Burden of Patients With Spinal Tumor: Validation of the Chinese Version of the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Spine Tumor Module.

CONTEXT: Tumors involving the spine are associated with unique symptoms affecting both patient survival and health-related quality of life. Currently, there is no disease-specific instrument in Chinese to assess the symptom burden of these patients. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to translate and validate a Chinese version of the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Spine Tumor Module (MDASI-SP-C) to assess the symptom burden of Chinese-speaking patients with spinal tumors. METHODS: MDASI-SP-C was forward-and-backward translated according to standard protocols and administered to patients fulfilling study criteria at a major referral center of spine tumor between November 2014 and September 2015. The generic instruments of Short Form 36 Quality of Life Questionnaire (SF-36), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Version (FACT-G), and Karnofsky Performance Scale were used along with MDASI-SP-C. Prevalence and severity distribution of each item were analyzed. Psychometric assessment and hierarchical cluster analysis were performed for the translated instrument. RESULTS: One hundred forty-two patients were enrolled. High interdependency and relatively low intra-cluster distances were identified. Cronbach's alpha of the entire instrument, the symptom severity subscale, and the interference subscale was 0.93, 0.91, and 0.92, respectively. Principal axis factoring resulted in a four-factor solution, which was reduced to a three-factor (general symptoms, spine-specific symptoms, and gastrointestinal symptoms) solution on account of clinical interpretation. Correlation coefficients between MDASI-SP-C items and their corresponding domains in SF-36 and/or FACT-G were all greater than 0.3. MDASI-SP-C was able to distinguish patients with different Karnofsky Performance Scale levels. CONCLUSION: MDASI-SP-C demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties and could be used to better assess the symptom burden of Chinese-speaking patients with spine tumors for improved management of their medical needs.

Postoperative quality-of-life assessment in patients with spine metastases treated with long-segment pedicle-screw fixation.

OBJECTIVE In recent decades, progress in the medical management of cancer has been significant, resulting in considerable extension of survival for patients with metastatic disease. This has, in turn, led to increased attention to the optimal surgical management of bone lesions, including metastases to the spine. In addition, there has been a shift in focus toward improving quality of life and reducing hospital stay for these patients, and many minimally invasive techniques have been introduced with the aim of reducing the morbidity associated with more traditional open approaches. The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy of long-segment percutaneous pedicle screw stabilization for the treatment of instability associated with thoracolumbar spine metastases in neurologically intact patients. METHODS This study was a retrospective review of data from a prospective database. The authors analyzed cases in which long-segment percutaneous pedicle screw fixation was performed for the palliative treatment of thoracolumbar spinal instability due to spinal metastases in neurologically intact patients. All of the patients included in the study underwent surgery between January 2014 and May 2015 at the authors' institution. Postoperative radiation therapy was planned within 10 days following the stabilization in all cases. Clinical and radiological follow-up assessments were planned for 3 days, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. Outcome was assessed by means of standard postoperative evaluation and oncological and spinal quality of life measures (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Version 3.0 [EORTC QLQ-C30] and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], respectively). Moreover, 5 patients were given an activity monitoring device for recording the distance walked daily; preoperative and postoperative daily distances were compared. RESULTS Data from 17 cases were analyzed. There were no complications, and patients showed improvement in pain level and quality of life from the early postoperative period on. The mean ODI score was 62.7 (range 40-84) preoperatively, 35.4 (range 24-59) on postoperative Day 3, and 46.1 (range 30-76) at 3 weeks, 37.6 (range 25-59) at 6 weeks, 34.0 (range 24-59) at 3 months, 39.1 (range 22-64) at 6 months, and 30.0 (range 20-55) at 1 year after screw placement. The mean ODI was significantly improved in the first 45 days (p < 0.001). Improvement was also evident in scores for functional and symptomatic scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30. All patients underwent postoperative radiation therapy within 10 days (mean 7.5). All patients (n = 5) with an activity monitoring device showed improvement in daily walking distance. CONCLUSIONS Less-invasive palliative treatment for advanced spinal metastases is promising as part of a multidisciplinary approach to the care of patients with metastatic disease. The results of this study indicate that percutaneous surgery may allow for rapid improvement in quality of life and walking ability for patients with thoracolumbar instability due to spine metastases. Long-segment percutaneous screw fixation followed by early radiation therapy appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for providing solid and durable stability and improved quality of life for these patients.