RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In anticipation of a demand surge for hospital beds attributed to the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) many US states have mandated that hospitals postpone elective admissions. OBJECTIVES: To estimate excess demand for hospital beds due to COVID-19, the net financial impact of eliminating elective admissions in order to meet demand, and to explore the scenario when demand remains below capacity. RESEARCH DESIGN: An economic simulation to estimate the net financial impact of halting elective admissions, combining epidemiological reports, the US Census, American Hospital Association Annual Survey, and the National Inpatient Sample. Deterministic sensitivity analyses explored the results while varying assumptions for demand and capacity. SUBJECTS: Inputs regarding disease prevalence and inpatient utilization were representative of the US population. Our base case relied on a hospital admission rate reported by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention of 137.6 per 100,000, with the highest rates in people aged 65 years and older (378.8 per 100,000) and 50-64 years (207.4 per 100,000). On average, elective admissions accounted for 20% of total hospital admissions, and the average rate of unoccupied beds across hospitals was 30%. MEASURES: Net financial impact of halting elective admissions. RESULTS: On average, hospitals COVID-19 demand for hospital bed-days fell well short of hospital capacity, resulting in a substantial financial loss. The net financial impact of a 90-day COVID surge on a hospital was only favorable under a narrow circumstance when capacity was filled by a high proportion of COVID-19 cases among hospitals with low rates of elective admissions. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals that restricted elective care took on a substantial financial risk, potentially threatening viability. A sustainable public policy should therefore consider support to hospitals that responsibly served their communities through the crisis.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Economia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Ocupação de Leitos/economia , Ocupação de Leitos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Número de Leitos em Hospital/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Método de Monte Carlo , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Opportunity costs of bed-days are fundamental to understanding the value of healthcare systems. They greatly influence burden of disease estimations and economic evaluations involving stays in healthcare facilities. However, different estimation techniques employ assumptions that differ crucially in whether to consider the value of the second-best alternative use forgone, of any available alternative use, or the value of the actually chosen alternative. Informed by economic theory, this paper provides a taxonomic framework of methodologies for estimating the opportunity costs of resources. This taxonomy is then applied to bed-days by classifying existing approaches accordingly. We highlight differences in valuation between approaches and the perspective adopted, and we use our framework to appraise the assumptions and biases underlying the standard approaches that have been widely adopted mostly unquestioned in the past, such as the conventional use of reference costs and administrative accounting data. Drawing on these findings, we present a novel approach for estimating the opportunity costs of bed-days in terms of health forgone for the second-best patient, but expressed monetarily. This alternative approach effectively re-connects to the concept of choice and explicitly considers net benefits. It is broadly applicable across settings and for other resources besides bed-days.
Assuntos
Ocupação de Leitos/economia , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde/economia , Modelos Econômicos , Custos e Análise de Custo , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economiaRESUMO
Because the demand for intensive care unit (ICU) beds exceeds the supply in general, and because of the formidable costs of that level of care, clinicians face ethical issues when rationing this kind of care not only at the point of admission to the ICU, but also after the fact. Under what conditions-if any-may patients be denied admission to the ICU or removed after admission? One professional medical group has defended a rule of "first come, first served" in ICU admissions, and this approach has numerous moral considerations in its favor. We show, however, that admission to the ICU is not in and of itself guaranteed; we also show that as a matter of principle, it can be morally permissible to remove certain patients from the ICU, contrary to the idea that because they were admitted first, they are entitled to stay indefinitely through the point of recovery, death, or voluntary withdrawal. What remains necessary to help guide these kinds of decisions is the articulation of clear standards for discontinuing intensive care, and the articulation of these standards in a way consistent with not only fiduciary and legal duties that attach to clinical care but also with democratic decision making processes.
Assuntos
Ocupação de Leitos/ética , Tomada de Decisões/ética , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde/ética , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/ética , Admissão do Paciente , Ocupação de Leitos/economia , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde/economia , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Tempo de Internação/economia , Admissão do Paciente/economia , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Peripheral inserted central catheters (PICCs) have increasingly become the mainstay of patients requiring prolonged treatment with antibiotics, transfusions, oncologic IV therapy and total parental nutrition. They may also be used in delivering a number of other medications to patients. In recent years, bed occupancy rates have become hugely pressurized in many hospitals and any potential solutions to free up beds is welcome. Recent introductions of doctor or nurse led intravenous (IV) outpatient based treatment teams has been having a direct effect on early discharge of patients and in some cases avoiding admission completely. The ability to deliver outpatient intravenous treatment is facilitated by the placement of PICCs allowing safe and targeted treatment of patients over a prolonged period of time. We carried out a retrospective study of 2,404 patients referred for PICCs from 2009 to 2015 in a university teaching hospital. There was an exponential increase in the number of PICCs requested from 2011 to 2015 with a 64% increase from 2012 to 2013. The clear increase in demand for PICCs in our institution is directly linked to the advent of outpatient intravenous antibiotic services. In this paper, we assess the impact that the use of PICCs combined with intravenous outpatient treatment may have on cost and hospital bed demand. We advocate that a more widespread implementation of this service throughout Ireland may result in significant cost savings as well as decreasing the number of patients on hospital trollies.
Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Ocupação de Leitos/economia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/economia , Redução de Custos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Ocupação de Leitos/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateterismo Periférico , Cateteres de Demora , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Irlanda , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Purpose As hospitals are the most costly service providers in every healthcare systems, special attention should be given to their performance in terms of resource allocation and consumption. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate technical, allocative and economic efficiency in intensive care units (ICUs) of hospitals affiliated by Yazd University of Medical Sciences (YUMS) in 2015. Design/methodology/approach This was a descriptive, analytical study conducted in ICUs of seven training hospitals affiliated by YUMS using data envelopment analysis (DEA) in 2015. The number of physicians, nurses, active beds and equipment were regarded as input variables and bed occupancy rate, the number of discharged patients, economic information such as bed price and physicians' fees were mentioned as output variables of the study. Available data from study variables were retrospectively gathered and analyzed through the Deap 2.1 software using the variable returns to scale methodology. Findings The study findings revealed the average scores of allocative, economic, technical, managerial and scale efficiency to be relatively 0.956, 0.866, 0.883, 0.89 and 0.913. Regarding to latter three types of efficiency, five hospitals had desirable performance. Practical implications Given that additional costs due to an extra number of manpower or unnecessary capital resources impose economic pressure on hospitals also the fact that reduction of surplus production plays a major role in reducing such expenditures in hospitals, it is suggested that departments with low efficiency reduce their input surpluses to achieve the optimal level of performance. Originality/value The authors applied a DEA approach to measure allocative, economic, technical, managerial and scale efficiency of under-study hospitals. This is a helpful linear programming method which acts as a powerful and understandable approach for comparative performance assessment in healthcare settings and a guidance for healthcare managers to improve their departments' performance.
Assuntos
Eficiência Organizacional , Hospitais Públicos/organização & administração , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Ocupação de Leitos/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Irã (Geográfico) , Estudos de Casos Organizacionais , Administração de Recursos Humanos em Hospitais/economia , Administração de Recursos Humanos em Hospitais/métodos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The high cost of critical care has engendered research into identifying influential factors. However, existing studies have not considered patient vital status at ICU discharge. This study sought to determine the effect of mortality upon the total cost of an ICU stay. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Twenty-six ICUs at 13 hospitals in the United States. PATIENTS: 58,344 admissions from January 1, 2012, to June 30, 2016, obtained from a commercial ICU database. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The median observed cost of a unit stay was $9,619 (mean = $16,353). A multivariable regression model was developed on the log of total costs for a unit stay, using severity of illness, unit admitting diagnosis, mortality in the unit, daily unit occupancy (occupying a bed at midnight), and length of mechanical ventilation. This model had an r of 0.67 and a median difference between observed and expected costs of $437. The first few days of care and the first day receiving mechanical ventilation had the largest effect on total costs. Patients dying before unit discharge had 12.4% greater costs than survivors (p < 0.01; 99% CI = 9.3-15.5%) after multivariable adjustment. This effect was most pronounced for patients with an extended ICU stay who were receiving mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: While the largest drivers of ICU costs at the patient level are day 1 room occupancy and day 1 mechanical ventilation, mortality before unit discharge is associated with substantially higher costs. The increase was most evident for patients with an extended ICU stay who were receiving mechanical ventilation. Studies evaluating costs among ICUs need to take mortality into account.
Assuntos
Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ocupação de Leitos/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente/economia , Respiração Artificial/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Sexuais , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Decreasing hospital length of stay, and so freeing up hospital beds, represents an important cost saving which is often used in economic evaluations. The savings need to be accurately quantified in order to make optimal health care resource allocation decisions. Traditionally the accounting cost of a bed is used. We argue instead that the economic cost of a bed day is the better value for making resource decisions, and we describe our valuation method and estimations for costing this important resource. METHODS: We performed a contingent valuation using 37 Australian Chief Executive Officers' (CEOs) willingness to pay (WTP) to release bed days in their hospitals, both generally and using specific cases. We provide a succinct thematic analysis from qualitative interviews post survey completion, which provide insight into the decision making process. RESULTS: On average CEOs are willing to pay a marginal rate of $216 for a ward bed day and $436 for an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) bed day, with estimates of uncertainty being greater for ICU beds. These estimates are significantly lower (four times for ward beds and seven times for ICU beds) than the traditional accounting costs often used. Key themes to emerge from the interviews include the importance of national funding and targets, and their associated incentive structures, as well as the aversion to discuss bed days as an economic resource. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance for valuing bed days as an economic resource to inform cost effectiveness models and thus improve hospital decision making and resource allocation. Significantly under or over valuing the resource is very likely to result in sub-optimal decision making. We discuss the importance of recognising the opportunity costs of this resource and highlight areas for future research.
Assuntos
Ocupação de Leitos/economia , Diretores de Hospitais , Cuidados Críticos/economia , Análise de Variância , Austrália , Análise Custo-Benefício , Hospital Dia/economia , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Alocação de RecursosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Rising acuity levels in inpatient settings have led to growing reliance on observers and increased the cost of care. OBJECTIVES: Minimizing use of observers, maintaining quality and safety of care, and improving bed access, without increasing cost. DESIGN: Nursing staff on two inpatient psychiatric units at an academic medical center pilot-tested the use of a "milieu manager" to address rising patient acuity and growing reliance on observers. Nursing cost, occupancy, discharge volume, unit closures, observer expense, and incremental nursing costs were tracked. Staff satisfaction and reported patient behavioral/safety events were assessed. RESULTS: The pilot initiatives ran for 8 months. Unit/bed closures fell to zero on both units. Occupancy, patient days, and discharges increased. Incremental nursing cost was offset by reduction in observer expense and by revenue from increases in occupancy and patient days. Staff work satisfaction improved and measures of patient safety were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention was effective in reducing observation expense and improved occupancy and patient days while maintaining patient safety, representing a cost-effective and safe approach for management of acuity on inpatient psychiatric units.
Assuntos
Pacientes Internados , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Unidade Hospitalar de Psiquiatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Carga de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Ocupação de Leitos/economia , Ocupação de Leitos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/economia , Alta do Paciente/economia , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Segurança do Paciente/economia , Segurança do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Projetos Piloto , Unidade Hospitalar de Psiquiatria/economia , Carga de Trabalho/economiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: UK health services are under pressure to make cost savings while maintaining quality of care. Typically reducing the length of time patients stay in hospital and increasing bed occupancy are advocated to achieve service efficiency. Around 800,000 women give birth in the UK each year making maternity care a high volume, high cost service. Although average length of stay on the postnatal ward has fallen substantially over the years there is pressure to make still further reductions. This paper explores and discusses the possible cost savings of further reductions in length of stay, the consequences for postnatal services in the community, and the impact on quality of care. METHOD: We draw on a range of pre-existing data sources including, national level routinely collected data, workforce planning data and data from national surveys of women's experience. Simulation and a financial model were used to estimate excess demand, work intensity and bed occupancy to explore the quantitative, organisational consequences of reducing the length of stay. These data are discussed in relation to findings of national surveys to draw inferences about potential impacts on cost and quality of care. DISCURSIVE ANALYSIS: Reducing the length of time women spend in hospital after birth implies that staff and bed numbers can be reduced. However, the cost savings may be reduced if quality and access to services are maintained. Admission and discharge procedures are relatively fixed and involve high cost, trained staff time. Furthermore, it is important to retain a sufficient bed contingency capacity to ensure a reasonable level of service. If quality of care is maintained, staffing and bed capacity cannot be simply reduced proportionately: reducing average length of stay on a typical postnatal ward by six hours or 17% would reduce costs by just 8%. This might still be a significant saving over a high volume service however, earlier discharge results in more women and babies with significant care needs at home. Quality and safety of care would also require corresponding increases in community based postnatal care. Simply reducing staffing in proportion to the length of stay increases the workload for each staff member resulting in poorer quality of care and increased staff stress. CONCLUSIONS: Many policy debates, such as that about the length of postnatal hospital-stay, demand consideration of multiple dimensions. This paper demonstrates how diverse data sources and techniques can be integrated to provide a more holistic analysis. Our study suggests that while earlier discharge from the postnatal ward may achievable, it may not generate all of the anticipated cost savings. Some useful savings may be realised but if staff and bed capacity are simply reduced in proportion to the length of stay, care quality may be compromised.
Assuntos
Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidado Pós-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Ocupação de Leitos/economia , Ocupação de Leitos/estatística & dados numéricos , Redução de Custos/economia , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares , Maternidades/economia , Maternidades/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/economia , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Tocologia/economia , Tocologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidade do Paciente , Admissão do Paciente/economia , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Alta do Paciente/economia , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Segurança do Paciente/economia , Segurança do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Satisfação do Paciente , Cuidado Pós-Natal/economia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Escócia , Carga de Trabalho/economiaRESUMO
This article is a methodological review to help the intensivist gain insights into the classic and sometimes arcane maze of national databases and methodologies used to determine and analyze the ICU bed supply, use, occupancy, and costs in the United States. Data for total ICU beds, use, and occupancy can be derived from two large national healthcare databases: the Healthcare Cost Report Information System maintained by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the proprietary Hospital Statistics of the American Hospital Association. Two costing methodologies can be used to calculate U.S. ICU costs: the Russell equation and national projections. Both methods are based on cost and use data from the national hospital datasets or from defined groups of hospitals or patients. At the national level, an understanding of U.S. ICU bed supply, use, occupancy, and costs helps provide clarity to the width and scope of the critical care medicine enterprise within the U.S. healthcare system. This review will also help the intensivist better understand published studies on administrative topics related to critical care medicine and be better prepared to participate in their own local hospital organizations or regional critical care medicine programs.
Assuntos
Ocupação de Leitos/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Críticos/economia , Medicina de Emergência/economia , Custos Hospitalares , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Ocupação de Leitos/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Cuidados Críticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Medicina de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Estados UnidosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Attendance of staff and use of resources during treatment have an impact on costs. For palliative radiotherapy, no reliable data are available on the subject. Therefore, the measurement of selected variables (staff absorbance and room occupancy) based on daily palliative irradiation was the aim of our prospective study. The analysis is part of a larger study conducted by the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO). PATIENTS, MATERIAL, AND METHODS: A total of 172 palliative radiation treatments were followed up prospectively between October 2009 and March 2010. The study was performed at two experienced radiotherapy departments (Herne and Bielefeld) and evaluated the attendance of medical personnel and room occupancy related to the selected steps of the treatment procedure: treatment planning and daily application of radiation dose. RESULTS: Computed tomography for treatment planning engaged the unit for 19 min (range: 17-22 min). The localization of target volume required on average 28 min of a technician's working time. The mean attendance of the entire staff (radiation oncologist, physicist, technician) for treatment planning was 159 min, while the total room occupancy was 140 min. Depending on the type of treatment, the overall duration of a radiotherapy session varied on average between 8 and 18 min. The staff was absorbed by the first treatment session (including portal imaging) for 8-27 min. Mean room occupancy was 18 min (range: 6-65 min). The longest medical staff attendance was observed during an initial irradiation session (mean: 11 min). Radiotherapy sessions with weekly performed field verifications occupied the rooms slightly longer (mean: 10 min, range: 4-25 min) than daily radiotherapy sessions (mean: 9 min, range: 3-29 min). We observed that the patients' symptoms, their condition, and their social environment confounded the time schedule. CONCLUSIONS: Target localization, treatment planning, and performance of palliative radiotherapy absorb resources to an extent comparable to nonpalliative treatment. Because of unexpected events, the time schedule before and during radiotherapy may reveal strong interindividual variability.
Assuntos
Agendamento de Consultas , Ocupação de Leitos/estatística & dados numéricos , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Cuidados Paliativos , Ocupação de Leitos/economia , Comportamento Cooperativo , Seguimentos , Alemanha , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde/economia , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Neoplasias/economia , Cuidados Paliativos/economia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/economia , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Tempo e Movimento , Recursos HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Strategic planning has been presented as a valuable management tool. However, evidence of its deployment in healthcare and its effect on organizational performance is limited in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). The study aimed to explore the use of strategic planning processes in Lebanese hospitals and to investigate its association with financial performance. METHODS: The study comprised 79 hospitals and assessed occupancy rate (OR) and revenue-per-bed (RPB) as performance measures. The strategic planning process included six domains: having a plan, plan development, plan implementation, responsibility of planning activities, governing board involvement, and physicians' involvement. RESULTS: Approximately 90% of hospitals have strategic plans that are moderately developed (mean score of 4.9 on a 1-7 scale) and implemented (score of 4.8). In 46% of the hospitals, the CEO has the responsibility for the plan. The level of governing board involvement in the process is moderate to high (score of 5.1), whereas physician involvement is lower (score of 4.1). The OR and RPB amounted to respectively 70% and 59 304 among hospitals with a strategic plan as compared with 62% and 33 564 for those lacking such a plan. No statistical association between having a strategic plan and either of the two measures was detected. However, the findings revealed that among hospitals that had a strategic plan, higher implementation levels were associated with lower OR (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In an LMIC healthcare environment characterized by resource limitation, complexity, and political and economic volatility, flexibility rather than rigid plans allow organizations to better cope with environmental turbulence.
Assuntos
Economia Hospitalar/organização & administração , Planejamento em Saúde/métodos , Ocupação de Leitos/economia , Coleta de Dados , Países em Desenvolvimento , Planejamento em Saúde/economia , Administração Hospitalar/métodos , Hospitais Privados/economia , Hospitais Privados/organização & administração , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Hospitais Públicos/organização & administração , Hospitais de Ensino/economia , Hospitais de Ensino/organização & administração , Humanos , Líbano , Objetivos Organizacionais/economiaRESUMO
Remdesivir and dexamethasone are the only drugs providing reductions in the lengths of hospital stays for COVID-19 patients. We assessed the impacts of remdesivir on hospital-bed resources and budgets affected by the COVID-19 outbreak. A stochastic agent-based model was combined with epidemiological data available on the COVID-19 outbreak in France and data from two randomized control trials. Strategies involving treating with remdesivir only patients with low-flow oxygen and patients with low-flow and high-flow oxygen were examined. Treating all eligible low-flow oxygen patients during the entirety of the second wave would have decreased hospital-bed occupancy in conventional wards by 4% [2%; 7%] and intensive care unit (ICU)-bed occupancy by 9% [6%; 13%]. Extending remdesivir use to high-flow-oxygen patients would have amplified reductions in ICU-bed occupancy by up to 14% [18%; 11%]. A minimum remdesivir uptake of 20% was required to observe decreases in bed occupancy. Dexamethasone had effects of similar amplitude. Depending on the treatment strategy, using remdesivir would, in most cases, generate savings (up to 722) or at least be cost neutral (an extra cost of 34). Treating eligible patients could significantly limit the saturation of hospital capacities, particularly in ICUs. The generated savings would exceed the costs of medications.
Assuntos
Monofosfato de Adenosina/análogos & derivados , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Antivirais/economia , Ocupação de Leitos/economia , Dexametasona/economia , Monofosfato de Adenosina/economia , Monofosfato de Adenosina/uso terapêutico , Alanina/economia , Alanina/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Ocupação de Leitos/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19/economia , COVID-19/virologia , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , França , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Tempo de Internação , Modelos Estatísticos , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19RESUMO
AIMS: The UK National Health Service in England pays for inpatients using a formula ('tariff'). The appropriateness of the tariff for people with diabetes is unknown. We have compared the tariff paid and costs for inpatients with/without diabetes and tested the concept of a 'diabetes-attributable hospitalization cost'. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, retrospective 12-month audit in a single teaching hospital assessing mortality, bed days per annum and 'diabetes-attributable hospitalization cost' (i.e. the proportion of costs for all patients with diabetes in excess of that paid for comparable patients without diabetes). RESULTS: There were 64 829 inpatient admissions, with 4864 of those coded as having diabetes; 12.9% was estimated to be the number of patients having diabetes but not coded. People with diabetes occupied 13.9% of all bed days and were 18.1% (1.3-37.8%) more likely to die (age adjusted). The mean bed days per annum were greatest among those with (vs. without) diabetes (men 10.9 ± 17.0 vs. 6.3 ± 12.8; women 11.4 ± 19.4 vs. 5.9 ± 11.6; P < 0.001). The greatest excess admission rates were among those aged 25-64 years. The annual mean tariff was greater for those with diabetes (5380 ± 8740) than those without diabetes (3706 ± 6221) (P < 0.001). The overall cost was even higher among those with diabetes: 5835 ± 11 246 vs. 3567 ± 7238 (P < 0.001). The diabetes-attributable hospitalization cost was 46.5% (9 125 085). An HbA(1c) > 10.0% (> 86 mmol/mol) was associated with excess hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Those with diabetes cost more and are more likely to die when inpatients. The tariff paid for diabetes is high, but in this centre less than the actual costs. Approaches known to reduce hospitalization are urgently required.
Assuntos
Ocupação de Leitos/economia , Diabetes Mellitus/economia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ocupação de Leitos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Auditoria Médica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Reino Unido , Adulto JovemRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Some have suggested that emergency department (ED) boarding is prevalent because it maximizes revenue as hospitals prioritize non-ED admissions, which reimburse higher than ED admissions. We explore the revenue implications to the overall hospital of reducing boarding in the ED. METHODS: We quantified the revenue effect of reducing boarding-the balance of higher ED demand and the reduction of non-ED admissions-using financial modeling informed by regression analysis and discrete-event simulation with data from 1 inner-city teaching hospital during 2 years (118,000 ED visits, 22% ED admission rate, 7% left without being seen rate, 36,000 non-ED admissions). Various inpatient bed management policies for reducing non-ED admissions were tested. RESULTS: Non-ED admissions generated more revenue than ED admissions ($4,118 versus $2,268 per inpatient day). A 1-hour reduction in ED boarding time would result in $9,693 to $13,298 of additional daily revenue from capturing left without being seen and diverted ambulance patients. To accommodate this demand, we found that simulated management policies in which non-ED admissions are reduced without consideration to hospital capacity (ie, static policies) mostly did not result in higher revenue. Many dynamic policies requiring cancellation of various proportions of non-ED admissions when the hospital reaches specific trigger points increased revenue. The optimal strategies tested resulted in an estimated $2.7 million and $3.6 in net revenue per year, depending on whether left without being seen patients were assumed to be outpatients or mirrored ambulatory admission rates, respectively. CONCLUSION: Dynamic inpatient bed management in inner-city teaching hospitals in which non-ED admissions are occasionally reduced to ensure that EDs have reduced boarding times is a financially attractive strategy.
Assuntos
Ocupação de Leitos/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Adulto , Ocupação de Leitos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitais com mais de 500 Leitos , Preços Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econômicos , Pacientes Ambulatoriais/estatística & dados numéricos , Admissão do Paciente/economia , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , ProbabilidadeRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Germany is experiencing the second COVID-19 pandemic wave. The intensive care unit (ICU) bed capacity is an important consideration in the response to the pandemic. The purpose of this study was to determine the costs and benefits of maintaining or expanding a staffed ICU bed reserve capacity in Germany. METHODS: This study compared the provision of additional capacity to no intervention from a societal perspective. A decision model was developed using, e.g. information on age-specific fatality rates, ICU costs and outcomes, and the herd protection threshold. The net monetary benefit (NMB) was calculated based upon the willingness to pay for new medicines for the treatment of cancer, a condition with a similar disease burden in the near term. RESULTS: The marginal cost-effectiveness ratio (MCER) of the last bed added to the existing ICU capacity is 21,958 per life-year gained assuming full bed utilization. The NMB decreases with an additional expansion but remains positive for utilization rates as low as 2%. In a sensitivity analysis, the variables with the highest impact on the MCER were the mortality rates in the ICU and after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: This article demonstrates the applicability of cost-effectiveness analysis to policies of hospital pandemic preparedness and response capacity strengthening. In Germany, the provision of a staffed ICU bed reserve capacity appears to be cost-effective even for a low probability of bed utilization.
Assuntos
Ocupação de Leitos/economia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Técnicas de Planejamento , Análise Custo-Benefício , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
In the article are shown in the interventions application for re-entry plan in the Region Campania.
Assuntos
Ocupação de Leitos/normas , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Hospitais Urbanos/normas , Avaliação das Necessidades , Desenvolvimento de Programas/normas , Ocupação de Leitos/economia , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/normas , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Política de Saúde , Promoção da Saúde , Humanos , Itália , Desenvolvimento de Programas/economiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify the time period during which a hospital bed could be virtually available according to the informatics and administrative hospital system while still being physically occupied by a patient in a hospital in Mexico. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a 250-bed Academic Medical Center located in Central Northern Mexico during February 2015. Both administrative and real patient discharges were registered in a hospital format. Central tendency measures were used to present collected data and bed/day costs were obtained from official national published costs. RESULTS: Nine hundred and forty-three patients were followed up during their hospital discharge process. Overall, 2.4% of hospital beds were occupied by discharged patients. The annual cost only for cold beds was $959,220.00 US$ ($14,348,304.00 MNX), without bringing about any benefits for patients. Cold beds represented 1.31% of the 2015 annual hospital budget. CONCLUSIONS: Quality improvement initiatives must be implemented to allocate beds to patients more efficiently. The discharge process must be standardized to reduce bed/day direct hospital costs and strengthen the supervision of medical residents during this process.
OBJETIVO: Identificar el periodo de tiempo durante el cual una cama hospitalaria está virtualmente disponible en el sistema informático, mientras está ocupada por un paciente, en un hospital de México. MÉTODO: Se realizó un estudio transversal en un centro médico académico de 250 camas, localizado en el centro-norte de México, en febrero de 2015. El alta administrativa y real del paciente fueron registradas en un formato institucional. Se utilizaron medidas de tendencia central para presentar los datos. El costo del día/cama se obtuvo de lo oficial publicado para la nación. RESULTADOS: 943 pacientes fueron seguidos durante el proceso de egreso. El 2.4% del total de las camas estuvo ocupada por pacientes egresados. El costo anual por las camas frías/muertas fue de $959,220.00 US$ ($14,348,304.00 MNX), sin beneficio para los pacientes. Las camas frías/muertas representaron el 1.31% del presupuesto hospitalario anual en el año 2015. CONCLUSIONES: Es necesario implementar iniciativas de mejora para asignar eficientemente las camas a los pacientes. El proceso de egreso debe estandarizarse para reducir el costo directo hospitalario por día/cama. Hay que fortalecer la supervisión de médicos residentes que participan en este proceso.
Assuntos
Ocupação de Leitos/estatística & dados numéricos , Alta do Paciente , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Ocupação de Leitos/economia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Masculino , MéxicoRESUMO
This article examines the relationship between hospital profitability and efficiency. A cross-section of 1317 U.S. metropolitan, acute care, not-for-profit hospitals for the year 2015 was employed. We use a frontier method, stochastic frontier analysis, to estimate hospital efficiency. Total margin and operating margin were used as profit variables in OLS regressions that were corrected for heteroskedacity. In addition to estimated efficiency, control variables for internal and external correlates of profitability were included in the regression models. We found that more efficient hospitals were also more profitable. The results show a positive relationship between profitability and size, concentration of output, occupancy rate and membership in a multi-hospital system. An inverse relationship was found between profits and academic medical centers, average length of stay, location in a Medicaid expansion state, Medicaid and Medicare share of admissions, and unemployment rate. The results of a Hausman test indicates that efficiency is exogenous in the profit equations. The findings suggest that not-for-profit hospitals will be responsive to incentives for increasing efficiency and use market power to increase surplus to pursue their objectives.
Assuntos
Eficiência Organizacional , Administração Financeira de Hospitais/organização & administração , Organizações sem Fins Lucrativos/organização & administração , Ocupação de Leitos/economia , Estudos Transversais , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Administração Financeira de Hospitais/economia , Número de Leitos em Hospital/economia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas Multi-Institucionais/economia , Organizações sem Fins Lucrativos/economia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Adult patients on prolonged acute mechanical ventilation (PAMV) comprise 1/3 of all adult MV patients, consume 2/3 of hospital resources allocated to MV population, and are nearly twice as likely to require a discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF). Their numbers are projected to double by year 2020. To aid in planning for this growth, we projected their annualized days and costs of hospital use and SNF discharges in year 2020 in the US. METHODS: We constructed a model estimating the relevant components of hospital utilization. We computed the total days and costs for each component; we also applied the risk for SNF discharge to the total 2020 PAMV population. The underlying assumption was that process of care does not change over the time horizon. We performed Monte Carlo simulations to establish 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the point estimates. RESULTS: Given 2020 projected PAMV volume of 605,898 cases, they will require 3.6 (95% CI 2.7-4.8) million MV, 5.5 (95% CI 4.3-7.0) million ICU and 10.3 (95% CI 8.1-13.0) million hospital days, representing an absolute increase of 2.1 million MV, 3.2 million ICU and 6.5 million hospital days over year 2000, at a total inflation-adjusted cost of over $64 billion. Expected discharges to SNF are 218,123 (95% CI 177,268-266,739), compared to 90,928 in 2000. CONCLUSION: Our model suggest that the projected growth in the US in PAMV population by 2020 will result in annualized increases of more than 2, 3, and 6 million MV, ICU and hospital days, respectively, over year 2000. Such growth requires careful planning efforts and attention to efficiency of healthcare delivery.