Evaluation of lingual oscillometric blood pressure measurement in anaesthetized pigs.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the agreement between measurements of invasive blood pressure (IBP) and oscillometric blood pressure from the tongue (OBPton) using a multiparameter monitor. STUDY DESIGN: Unblinded, prospective, experimental study. ANIMALS: A total of 12 female Large White crossbreed pigs. METHODS: Pigs undergoing experimental procedures that required arterial cannula placement were recruited. A blood pressure cuff with the closest width to 40% of the circumference of the tongue was placed rostral to the lingual frenulum. Systolic, mean and diastolic IBP and OBPton were measured simultaneously at 5 minute intervals. Agreement between paired measurements was examined using Bland-Altman analysis. Mean bias, precision (standard deviation of mean bias), 95% limits of agreement, correlation coefficients and percentage of measurements within 10 and 20 mmHg of IBP were calculated. RESULTS: The total numbers of paired measurements recorded were 124, 126 and 124 for systolic, mean and diastolic blood pressures, respectively. The mean bias, precision and 95% limits of agreement for systolic OBPton were 11.5, 11.5 (-11.1 to 34.2), for mean OBPton 5.6, 5.7 (-5.7 to 16.8) and for diastolic OBPton 7.6, 10.1 (-12.1 to 27.4) mmHg. Correlation coefficients were greater than 0.9 for mean OBPton only. More than 50% of measurements were within 10 mmHg of IBP and 80% of measurements were within 20 mmHg of IBP for mean and diastolic OBPton only. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The tongue as a cuff site for oscillometric blood pressure measurement is a useful site for measuring mean arterial, but not systolic or diastolic blood pressure in anaesthetized Large White crossbreed pigs. This technique fulfils the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine criteria for measuring mean arterial pressure but not systolic or diastolic arterial pressure.

Agreement of high-definition oscillometry at two cuff locations with invasively measured arterial blood pressures in anaesthetised cheetahs.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the agreement between high-definition oscillometry (HDO) used on the metatarsus or tail base with invasive arterial blood pressures measured in the dorsal pedal artery in anaesthetised cheetahs. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. ANIMALS: A group of 13 captive adult cheetahs. METHODS: Cheetahs were immobilised with medetomidine (32-45 µg kg-1) and tiletamine/zolazepam (0.93-1.39 mg kg-1) administered intramuscularly, and anaesthesia was maintained with either isoflurane in oxygen or continuous propofol infusion. Invasive blood pressure was measured via a 20 gauge intra-arterial catheter in the dorsal pedal artery in the metatarsus and used as a reference method for pressures simultaneously estimated using HDO on the contralateral metatarsus and tail base. Bland-Altman plots (for repeated measurements) and criteria defined by the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine (ACVIM) were used to compare agreement according to the anatomical location of the cuff, the anaesthetic maintenance agent and magnitude of the blood pressure. RESULTS: A total of 147 paired measurements were obtained with HDO on the metatarsus and 135 on the tail. Agreement with invasive pressures was better when HDO was used on the tail (rather than on the metatarsus) with all ACVIM criteria being met. Mean bias (a positive bias meaning that HDO overestimated the invasively measured pressures) ± standard deviation of differences for systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures were -7.0 ± 13.9, 4.2 ±12.1 and 4.6 ±11.2 mmHg, respectively, for HDO on the tail, and -11.9 ±15.1, 2.8 ±16.5 and 2.1 ±13.2 mmHg, respectively, for HDO on the metatarsus. Agreement was better during isoflurane anaesthesia than propofol, and at lower blood pressures than at higher. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When used on the tail base of anaesthetised cheetahs, HDO met the ACVIM validation criteria for a noninvasive device, as compared to invasively measured pressures in the dorsal pedal artery.

EVALUATION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN OSCILLOMETRIC AND DIRECT BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS IN ANESTHETIZED TIGERS (PANTHERA TIGRIS).

Noninvasive blood pressure measurement is commonly performed with oscillometry; however, this technique provides clinically helpful information only if it is representative of the gold standard. Agreement between direct and oscillometric blood pressure measurements were performed in 14 anesthetized, captive tigers (Panthera tigris). A cuff, placed around the tail base and connected to a multiparameter monitor, was used to measure arterial blood pressure oscillometrically and provided systolic, mean, and diastolic pressures. At the same time, direct blood pressures were obtained from a dorsal pedal arterial catheter, and the oscillometric and direct readings were considered paired data points. Agreement between the two methods was evaluated by Bland-Altman plots. All animals completed the study and provided 196 paired data points. The bias (mm Hg) for systolic, mean, and diastolic arterial pressures was -3.7, -0.8, and -1.6, respectively. Limits of agreement (mm Hg) for systolic, mean, and diastolic arterial pressures were -31 to 24, -29 to 27, and -29 to 26, respectively. Oscillometry provided an acceptable amount of readings within 10 and 20 mm Hg of the gold standard. The oscillometric technique provided reasonable agreement with direct measurements. Therefore, in the conditions used in this study, oscillometric blood pressure measured via the ventral coccygeal artery provided reasonable estimates of invasive blood pressure in anesthetized tigers.

Validation of oscillometric blood pressure measurement using a Datex S/5 Compact multiparameter monitor in anaesthetized adult dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To compare noninvasive (NIBP) with invasive blood pressure (IBP) measurements from a Datex S/5 Compact monitor in anaesthetized adult dogs, and to evaluate it according to the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine (ACVIM) and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) criteria. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. ANIMALS: A group of 34 client-owned adult dogs. METHODS: Dogs were anaesthetized for different surgical procedures using different anaesthetic protocols. IBP was measured using a catheter placed in a dorsal pedal artery. A blood pressure cuff was placed over the contralateral dorsal pedal artery for NIBP measurement. Data were recorded using the Datex iCollect program, and paired readings were matched every 3 minutes for 60 minutes. Bland-Altman and error grid analyses were used to estimate the agreement between IBP and NIBP measurements, and its clinical significance, respectively. Data were reported as mean bias [lower, upper limits of agreement (LoA)]. RESULTS: The Datex S/5 monitor conformed to most ACVIM criteria. The correlation coefficient was less than 0.9 for systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures (MAP). The best agreement between the noninvasive and invasive methods was observed for MAP, with LoA (-17 to 13 mmHg) and higher percentage of NIBP readings within 5 (55.6%), 10 (81.7%) and 20 (98.6%) mmHg of the IBP values. The Datex S/5 NIBP technology did not meet the AAMI validation criteria and less than 95% of the paired measurements were found within the green zone of the error grid analysis. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The Datex S/5 monitor conformed to most ACVIM criteria but not with the more rigorous AAMI standards. Despite good agreement between IBP and NIBP for MAP measurements, care must be taken when using this device to guide therapeutic interventions of blood pressure in anaesthetized healthy adult dogs.

Evaluation of the tongue for oscillometric measurement of arterial pressure in anesthetized Beagle dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the agreement between oscillometric blood pressure (OBP) measured from the tongue and invasive blood pressure (IBP), and to compare OBPs measured from the tongue with OBPs measured from the pelvic limb and tail. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective experimental study. ANIMALS: A total of eight adult Beagle dogs weighing 11.1 ± 1.2 kg. METHODS: Animals were premedicated with intravenous (IV) acepromazine (0.005 mg kg-1). Anesthesia was induced with alfaxalone (3 mg kg-1) IV and maintained with isoflurane. The dorsal pedal artery was catheterized for IBP measurements. Systolic (SAP), diastolic (DAP) and mean (MAP) arterial pressure were simultaneously measured from the tongue, pelvic limb and tail. Based on invasive SAP, hypertension (>140 mmHg), normotension (90-140 mmHg) and hypotension (<90 mmHg) were induced by controlling end-tidal isoflurane concentrations and/or dobutamine/dopamine administration. Agreement between paired IBP and OBP measurements was analyzed with reference standards for noninvasive blood pressure devices used in small animals and humans. RESULTS: Regardless of cuff placement, the mean bias ± standard deviation between IBP and OBP met veterinary (≤10 ± 15 mmHg) and human (<5 ± 8 mmHg) standards for MAP and DAP. SAP measurements provided by the OBP device showed unacceptable agreement with IBP, and the bias between methods increased at higher blood pressures, regardless of cuff site. During hypotension, tongue OBP showed the largest percentage of absolute difference <10 mmHg in relation to IBP for SAP (90%), MAP (97%), and DAP (93%), compared with pelvic limb (60%, 97% and 82%, respectively) and tail OBP (54%, 92% and 77%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The tongue is a clinically useful site for measuring OBP in anesthetized Beagle dogs, providing reliable estimates of MAP and DAP. The tongue could replace other cuff placement sites and may be a relatively suitable site for assessing hypotension.

Agreement of caudal aortic arterial blood pressure with oscillometry using two cuff widths placed on the thoracic or pelvic limbs of sevoflurane-anesthetized rabbits.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate agreement with central systemic arterial pressure of an oscillometer and two cuff widths placed on the thoracic or pelvic limbs. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective experimental study. ANIMALS: A group of nine New Zealand White rabbits weighing 3.5 ± 0.3 kg. METHODS: Rabbits were sedated with dexmedetomidine and midazolam, then anesthetized with ketamine and sevoflurane. The femoral artery was surgically exposed and a 20 gauge, 5 cm catheter inserted to measure systolic (SAP), mean (MAP) and diastolic (DAP) blood pressure at the iliac artery and caudal aorta junction. Adjustments of vaporizer dial and dobutamine infusion provided a range of invasive blood pressure (IBP). Two measurements of IBP were recorded during the oscillometer cycling phase, and the mean value was used in analyses. Oscillometer cuffs of bladder width 2.0 cm (S1) and 2.5 cm (S2) were placed proximal to the carpus and tarsus. Cuff width to circumference ratio was calculated. Oscillometer SAP, MAP and DAP were paired with corresponding IBP values. Agreement was assessed using linear mixed models (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Cuff ratios for both limbs were 41% (S1 cuff) and 50% (S2 cuff) and 122-139 paired observations were obtained. There was significant limb × cuff interaction with SAP and MAP. The oscillometer overestimated SAP and MAP on the pelvic limb and underestimated SAP and MAP on the thoracic limb. For SAP, the oscillometer overestimated by constant bias (-19 ± 2 mmHg) and proportional bias (0.28 ± 0.02 mmHg per 1 mmHg increase). For MAP, the oscillometer underestimated by constant bias (4 ± 2 mmHg) and was worse with S2 on the thoracic limb. Overestimation was similar between cuffs on the pelvic limb. For DAP, the oscillometer underestimated by constant bias (15 ± 2 mmHg). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Cuff S1 on the thoracic limb provided best estimation of MAP.

Evaluation of noninvasive blood pressure in anesthetized horses: Bias, limits of agreement, and comparative detection of a predetermined mean blood pressure warranting treatment.

Oscillometric blood pressure monitoring may be a practical tool for short procedures or those performed outside of the operating room. Oscillometric and direct blood pressure values in 30 juvenile and adult horses in a clinical setting using mixed effect models were compared. The limits of agreement and percentage errors were also calculated. We evaluated the sensitivity and false positive rate for the oscillometric method to trigger an intervention for treating blood pressure [direct mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 70 mmHg]. Oscillometric MAP and diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) differed from direct values (P < 0.001); systolic arterial pressure (SAP) did not (P = 0.08). Wide limits of agreement were observed. Percentage errors were smaller for SAP (39%) than for MAP and DAP (48% and 72%). The oscillometric monitor indicated there was a requirement for blood pressure treatment with a true positive rate of 82%, consequently, it failed 18% of the times. The false positive rate (unnecessary treatment) was 55%.

Évaluation non invasive de la pression artérielle chez des chevaux anesthésiés: biais, limites d'accord et détection comparative d'une pression artérielle moyenne prédéterminée justifiant un traitement. La surveillance oscillométrique de la pression artérielle peut être un outil pratique pour les procédures courtes ou celles effectuées hors de la salle d'opération. Les valeurs oscillométriques et directes de la pression artérielle chez 30 chevaux juvéniles et adultes en milieu clinique ont été comparées à l'aide de modèles à effets mixtes. Les limites d'accord et les pourcentages d'erreurs furent également calculés. Nous avons évalué la sensibilité et le taux de faux positifs de la méthode oscillométrique pour déclencher une intervention pour le traitement de la pression artérielle [pression artérielle moyenne directe (PAM) < 70 mmHg]. La PAM oscillométrique et la pression artérielle diastolique (PAD) différaient des valeurs directes (P < 0,001); mais pas la pression artérielle systolique (PAS) (P = 0,08). De larges limites d'accord ont été observées. Les pourcentages d'erreurs étaient plus faibles pour PAS (39 %) que pour PAM et PAD (48 % et 72 %). Le moniteur oscillométrique a indiqué qu'il y avait une exigence pour un traitement de la pression artérielle avec un taux de vrais positifs de 82 %, par conséquent, il a échoué 18 % des fois. Le taux de faux positifs (traitement inutile) était de 55 %.(Traduit par Dr Serge Messier).

Non-invasive blood pressure measurement in animals: Part 1 - Techniques for measurement and validation of non-invasive devices.

Arterial blood pressure is a common parameter evaluated in conscious and anesthetized veterinary species. Non-invasive blood pressure measurement techniques, such as Doppler ultrasonic flow detector and oscillometry, are attractive in certain animals due to their availability and ease of use. The greatest limitation to non-invasive blood pressure monitoring can be its inaccuracy, particularly in hypotensive or hypertensive patients and in certain species. Part 1 of this 2-part review summarizes the current techniques available to non-invasively measure arterial blood pressure in animals and discusses validation of non-invasive devices. Part 2 summarizes the veterinary literature that evaluates the use of non-invasive blood pressure measurement techniques in conscious and anesthetized species and develops general conclusions for proper use and interpretation of data from non-invasive blood pressure devices.

Mesures de la pression sanguine chez les animaux de manière non-invasive: Partie 1 ­ Techniques pour mesurer et validation d'appareils non-invasifs. La pression sanguine artérielle est un paramètre fréquemment évalué chez les espèces animales conscientes et anesthésiées. Des techniques non-invasives de mesure de la pression sanguine, telles que le détecteur ultra-sonique de flot Doppler et l'oscillométrie, sont attirantes chez certains animaux étant donné leur disponibilité et facilité d'utilisation. La plus grande limitation au suivi non-invasif de la pression sanguine peut être son imprécision, particulièrement chez les patients hypotensifs ou hypertensifs et chez certaines espèces. La partie 1 de cette revue en deux parties résume les techniques présentement disponibles pour mesurer de manière non-invasive la pression sanguine artérielle chez des animaux et discute la validation d'équipements non-invasifs. La partie 2 résume la littérature vétérinaire qui évalue l'utilisation de techniques de mesure non-invasives de la pression sanguine chez des espèces conscientes et anesthésiées et développe des conclusions générales pour l'utilisation appropriée et l'interprétation des données obtenues d'équipements noninvasifs de mesure de la pression sanguine.(Traduit par Dr Serge Messier).

Review of non-invasive blood pressure measurement in animals: Part 2 - Evaluation of the performance of non-invasive devices.

Arterial blood pressure is a common parameter evaluated in conscious and anesthetized veterinary patients for a variety of reasons. Non-invasive blood pressure measurement techniques, such as Doppler ultrasound and oscillometry, are attractive in certain veterinary patients due to their availability and ease of use. The greatest limitation to non-invasive blood pressure monitoring can be its inaccuracy, particularly in hypotensive or hypertensive patients and in certain species. Part 1 of this 2-part review summarized the current techniques available to non-invasively measure arterial blood pressure in veterinary species and discussed validation of non-invasive devices. Part 2 summarizes the veterinary literature that evaluates the use of non-invasive blood pressure measurement techniques in conscious and anesthetized species and develops general conclusions for proper use and interpretation of non-invasive blood pressure devices.

Mesure de la pression sanguine de manière non-invasive chez les animaux. Partie 2 ­ Évaluation de la performance des équipements non-invasifs. La pression sanguine artérielle est un paramètre fréquemment évalué chez les patients vétérinaires conscients et anesthésiés pour une variété de raisons. Les techniques noninvasives de mesure de la pression sanguine, telles que les ultrasons Doppler et l'oscillométrie, sont intéressantes chez certains patients vétérinaires étant donné leur disponibilité et leur facilité d'utilisation. La principale limitation du suivi de la pression sanguine par des méthodes non-invasives peut être son imprécision, particulièrement chez des patients hypotensifs ou hypertensifs, et chez certaines espèces. La première partie de cette revue en deux parties résumait les techniques présentement disponibles pour mesurer de manière non-invasive la pression sanguine artérielle chez des espèces animales et discutait de la validation des équipements non-invasifs. La deuxième partie résume la littérature vétérinaire qui évalue l'utilisation de techniques non-invasives de mesure de la pression sanguine chez des espèces conscientes et anesthésiées et développe des conclusions générales pour l'utilisation et l'interprétation appropriées des équipements non-invasifs de mesure de la pression sanguine.(Traduit par Dr Serge Messier).

Doppler and oscillometric mean blood pressure best represent direct blood pressure measurements in anesthetized rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

BACKGROUND: Indirect blood pressure measurements are often used to guide clinical decisions, but few studies have verified their agreement with direct arterial blood pressure in nonhuman primates. Here, the accuracy and precision of Doppler (DOP) and oscillometric (OS) [systolic (OSsys), mean (OSmean), and diastolic (OSdias)] blood pressure readings were assessed in rhesus macaques. METHODS: DOP and OS were utilized to measure blood pressure values in nine anesthetized rhesus macaques, which were compared to direct measurements via a saphenous arterial catheter. All measurements were taken simultaneously every 5 min for 60-240 min. RESULTS: DOP and OSsys underestimated direct systolic arterial pressure with a bias ± precision of 10.21 ± 6.37 mmHg and 11.67 ± 11.55 mmHg, respectively. OSmean correlated well with direct mean arterial pressure with a bias ± precision of 7.25 ± 7.35 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: DOP provided the better representation of systolic blood pressure, and OSmean provided a useful representation of mean arterial pressure in anesthetized rhesus macaques.

EVALUATION OF NONINVASIVE OSCILLOMETRIC BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING IN ANESTHETIZED BENNETT'S WALLABIES (MACROPUS RUFOGRISEUS).

The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of a noninvasive oscillometric method in relation to invasively measured blood pressure in anesthetized Bennett's wallabies (Macropus rufogriseus) and also to compare the accuracy of two commonly used oscillometric blood pressure monitors (manufactured by Cardell and Datascope). Eleven animals were anesthetized, and each animal was instrumented with an arterial catheter in the right medial metatarsal artery connected to a pressure transducer to obtain invasive measurements of systolic (SAP), diastolic (DAP), and mean (MAP) arterial blood pressure as well as a pressure waveform. A cuff connected to an oscillometric device was placed on the base of the tail for noninvasive measurements. Paired data from noninvasive and invasive blood pressure measurements (SAP, DAP, and MAP) were obtained every 5 min for 60 min. Bland-Altman plots were used to compare invasive and noninvasive measurements and calculate bias and 95% limits of agreement for SAP, DAP, and MAP. For both monitors, the bias of SAP, DAP, and MAP was significant, although the bias of the Cardell was consistently lower than that of the Datascope for all parameters. Limits of agreement were wide for all parameters. In conclusion, when using an oscillometric blood pressure monitor on anesthetized Bennett's wallabies, trends in blood pressure may be monitored, although all displayed readings may not represent the true blood pressure measurement. Indirect measurements of blood pressure made with the oscillometric device cannot substitute for direct measurements.

Prospective clinical study to evaluate an oscillometric blood pressure monitor in pet rabbits.

BACKGROUND: Rabbits are particularly sensitive to develop hypotension during sedation or anaesthesia. Values of systolic or mean non-invasive arterial blood pressure below 80 or 60 mmHg respectively are common under anaesthesia despite an ongoing surgery. A reliable method of monitoring arterial blood pressure is extremely important, although invasive technique is not always possible due to the anatomy and dimension of the artery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the agreement between a new oscillometric device for non-invasive arterial blood pressure measurement and the invasive method. Moreover the trending ability of the device, ability to identify changes in the same direction with the invasive methods, was evaluated as well as the sensibility of the device in identifying hypotension arbitrarily defined as invasive arterial blood pressure below 80 or 60 mmHg. RESULTS: Bland-Altman analysis for repeated measurements showed a poor agreement between the two methods; the oscillometric device overestimated the invasive arterial blood pressure, particularly at high arterial pressure values. The same analysis repeated considering oscillometric measurement that match invasive mean pressure lower or equal to 60 mmHg showed a decrease in biases and limits of agreement between methods. The trending ability of the device, evaluated with both the 4-quadrant plot and the polar plot was poor. Concordance rate of mean arterial blood pressure was higher than systolic and diastolic pressure although inferior to 90%. The sensibility of the device in detecting hypotension defined as systolic or mean invasive arterial blood pressure lower than 80 or 60 mmHg was superior for mean oscillometric pressure rather than systolic. A sensitivity of 92% was achieved with an oscillometric measurement for mean pressure below 65 mmHg instead of 60 mmHg. Non-invasive systolic blood pressure is less sensitive as indicator of hypotension regardless of the cutoff limit considered. CONCLUSIONS: Although mean invasive arterial blood pressure is overestimated by the device, the sensitivity of this non-invasive oscillometric monitor in detecting invasive mean pressure below 60 mmHg is acceptable but a cutoff value of 65 mmHg needs to be used.

The effect of anesthetic drug choice on accuracy of high-definition oscillometry in laterally recumbent horses.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of high-definition oscillometry (HDO) for arterial pressure measurement during injectable or inhalation anesthesia in horses. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, clinical study. ANIMALS: Twenty-four horses anesthetized for procedures requiring lateral recumbency. METHODS: Horses were premedicated with xylazine, and anesthesia induced with diazepam-ketamine. Anesthesia was maintained with xylazine-ketamine-guaifenesin combination [TripleDrip (TD; n = 12) or isoflurane (ISO; n = 12)]. HDO was used to obtain systolic (SAP), mean (MAP) and diastolic (DAP) arterial pressures, and heart rate (HR) using an 8-cm-wide cuff around the proximal tail. Invasive blood pressure (IBP), SAP, MAP, DAP and HR were recorded during HDO cycling. Bland-Altman analysis for repeated measures was used to compare HDO and IBP for all measurements. The generalized additive model was used to determine if means in the differences between HDO and IBP were similar between anesthetic protocols for all measurements. RESULTS: There were >110 paired samples for each variable. There was no effect of anesthetic choice on HDO performance, but more variability was present in TD compared with ISO. Skewed data required log-transformation for statistical comparison. Using raw data and standard Bland-Altman analysis, HDO overestimated SAP (TD, 3.8 ± 28.3 mmHg; ISO, 3.5 ± 13.6 mmHg), MAP (TD, 4.0 ± 23.3 mmHg; ISO, 6.3 ± 10.0 mmHg) and DAP (TD, 4.0 ± 21.2 mmHg; ISO, 7.8 ± 13.6 mmHg). In TD, 26-40% HDO measurements were within 10 mmHg of IBP, compared with 60-74% in ISO. Differences between HDO and IBP for all measurements were similar between anesthetic protocols. The numerical difference between IBP and HDO measurements for SAP, MAP and DAP significantly decreased as cuff width:tail girth ratio increased toward 40%. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: More variability in HDO occurred during TD. The cuff width:tail girth ratio is important for accuracy of HDO.

Comparison of arterial blood pressure measurements obtained invasively or oscillometrically using a Datex S/5 Compact monitor in anaesthetised adult horses.

OBJECTIVE: To assess agreement between noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) oscillometrically-derived values from a multiparameter monitor (Datex Ohmeda S/5 Compact) with those obtained by invasive blood pressure (IBP) measurement in anaesthetised horses undergoing elective surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. ANIMALS: A total of 40 healthy adult horses. METHODS: Horses were anaesthetised with various anaesthetic protocols (based on clinical requirements). Depending on positioning, cannulation of the facial or lateral metatarsal artery was performed for IBP measurement. The cannula was connected via a transducer to the monitor. An appropriately sized NIBP cuff was placed around the tail base and connected to the same monitor. Systolic (SAP), mean (MAP) and diastolic (DAP) arterial blood pressures were continuously recorded from the invasive system, and at 3 minute intervals from the oscillometric system, throughout the surgical procedure using a Datex iCollect program. An appropriate arithmetic correction factor was applied to the oscillometric results where the cuff was not level with the heart. Assessment of the degree of agreement between invasive and noninvasive readings at each time point was performed using a modified Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: While in many horses there was relatively close correlation between the values obtained over time, there was substantial variability in individual animals which resulted in wide Bland-Altman limits of agreement. The oscillometric device over-reads by approximately 32, 23 and 22 mmHg, and under-reads by 26, 17 and 19 mmHg for SAP, MAP and DAP, respectively, compared with the IBP values. However, using the mean difference and standard deviation, the device conforms to American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine (ACVIM) standards. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Oscillometric blood pressure measurement using the Datex Ohmeda S/5 Compact multiparameter monitor conforms to ACVIM standards when the NIBP cuff is placed on the tail. However, because of the wide variability in measurements, we cannot recommend this technique to guide therapy in anaesthetised adult horses.

Evaluation of an indirect oscillometric blood pressure monitor in anaesthetised dogs at three different anatomical locations.

AIMS: To evaluate the agreement between invasive and non-invasive measurements of blood pressure (BP) using an oscillometer (PetTrust) at three different anatomical locations in anaesthetised dogs under different haemodynamic conditions. METHODS: Eight adult Greyhounds weighing 23.5-36.5 kg were anaesthetised with isoflurane and positioned in dorsal recumbency. Systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured invasively via a dorsal pedal artery and non-invasively using the oscillometer with cuffs placed above the carpus, above the tarsus and around the tail base. Phenylephrine was administered to induce vasoconstriction, dobutamine was used to increase cardiac output and increased end-tidal concentrations of isoflurane were used to induce vasodilation. Correlation between measurements was analysed by linear regression and agreement was analysed using Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Seventy two representative measurements were obtained. Mean differences (bias) between invasive and non-invasive measurements were <5 mmHg except for DAP measured on the tail, and SD (precision) were <15 mm Hg except for SAP measured at the pelvic limb. Correlation coefficients were >0.9 except for SAP on the pelvic limb and DAP on the tail. More than 50 and 80% of values measured using oscillometry lay within 10 and 20 mmHg, respectively, of values measured invasively except for SAP on the tail. SAP tended to be overestimated when measured non-invasively at low BP, and be underestimated at high BP. DAP was underestimated during low BP and overestimated during high BP. Hypotension (MAP <60 mmHg) was detected by the oscillometer with a sensitivity ≥83% and specificity ≥98% at all locations. CONCLUSIONS: This oscillometric device met the 2007 American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine guidelines for measurement of BP on the thoracic limb. There was good agreement between the oscillometer and invasive measurement of MAP at all locations. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: MAP is the driving pressure for tissue perfusion, thus MAP measurement is clinically essential. This oscillometric device yields reliable MAP measurements at three anatomical locations over a wide range of BP and can identify hypotension with high sensitivity and specificity.

Agreement between two oscillometric blood pressure technologies and invasively measured arterial pressure in the dog.

OBJECTIVES: To compare two commonly used oscillometric technologies for obtaining noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurements and to determine if there is a difference in agreement between these systems and invasive blood pressure (IBP) measurements. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, experimental study. ANIMALS: Twenty adult laboratory dogs. METHODS: Each dog was anesthetized and its median caudal artery catheterized for IBP monitoring. An NIBP cuff was placed in the middle third of the antebrachium and attached to either monitor-1 or monitor-2. Four pairs of concurrent NIBP and IBP measurements were recorded with each monitor. Agreement between IBP and NIBP measurements was explored using Bland-Altman analysis, as well as the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine (ACVIM) and Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) guidelines for the validation of NIBP devices. RESULTS: Both NIBP technologies produced results that met the ACVIM and AAMI guidelines for the validation of NIBP devices. For monitor-1, analyses of agreement showed biases of 0.2 mmHg [95% limits of agreement (LoA) -11.8 to 12.3 mmHg] in systolic arterial pressure (SAP) values, -2.6 mmHg (95% LoA -14.4 to 9.1 mmHg) in diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) values, and -2.5 mmHg (95% LoA -12.7 to 7.3 mmHg) in mean arterial pressure (MAP) values. For monitor-2, analyses of agreement showed biases of 3.4 mmHg (95% LoA -8.7 to 15.5 mmHg) in SAP values, 2.2 mmHg (95% LoA -6.6 to 10.9 mmHg) in DAP values, and 1.6 mmHg (95% LoA -5.9 to 8.9 mmHg) in MAP values. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Multi-function monitors can contain components from various manufacturers. Clinicians should consider whether these have been validated in the species to be monitored. Both of the technologies studied here seem appropriate for use in dogs.

Agreement of high definition oscillometry with direct arterial blood pressure measurement at different blood pressure ranges in horses under general anaesthesia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the agreement of high definition oscillometry (HDO) with direct arterial blood pressure measurements in normotensive, hypotensive and hypertensive horses during general anaesthesia. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental study. ANIMALS: Seven healthy warmblood horses, aged 3-11 years, weighing 470-565 kg. METHODS: Measurements from a HDO device with the cuff placed around the base of the tail were compared with pressures measured invasively from the facial artery. High blood pressures were induced by intravenous (IV) administration of dobutamine (5 µg kg(-1) minute(-1)) over ten minutes followed by norepinephrine (0.1 mg kg(-1) IV) and low pressures by increasing the inspired fraction of isoflurane and administration of nitroglycerine (0.05 mg kg(-1) IV). For analysis three pressure levels were determined: high (MAP>110 mmHg), normal (60 mmHg

COMPARISON OF HIGH-DEFINITION OSCILLOMETRIC AND DIRECT ARTERIAL BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT IN ANESTHETIZED CHEETAHS (ACINONYX JUBATUS).

Blood pressure measurement reveals important insights into the health of conscious and anesthetized individuals. This is of particular interest in cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus), which in captivity are known to suffer from chronic diseases that may be associated with hypertension and which often require immobilization for transport or veterinary treatment. Invasive testing methods are considered the gold standard but are not practical in many settings. Consequently, it is important to evaluate the use of noninvasive methods in this species. Measurements for systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure obtained using high-definition oscillometry (HDO) at the coccygeal artery were compared to simultaneous direct measurements obtained via catheterization of the femoral or dorsal pedal artery in eight anesthetized captive cheetahs during nine anesthetic events. Overall, HDO and direct measurements agreed most closely for mean arterial pressure, and the poorest agreement was observed for systolic pressure. There was a tendency for low diastolic pressures to be underestimated and for high diastolic pressures to be overestimated. Across all three parameters, HDO measurements from the tail overestimated directly measured pressures in the femoral artery and underestimated those in the dorsal pedal artery. HDO agreed most closely with directly measured dorsal pedal pressures. Mean arterial pressure showed the greatest precision (standard deviation of 10.2 mm Hg) and lowest bias (-1.2 mm Hg), with 75.9% of readings within 10 mm Hg of the direct dorsal pedal pressure. Agreement with systolic pressure was hindered by a high bias (-10.4 mm Hg), but if a correction factor of +10 mm Hg was applied to all systolic measurements, agreement was improved and 65.7% of readings were within 10 mm Hg of the direct pressure. When compared to criteria defined by the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine for validation of blood pressure devices, results were favorable, but a limited sample size prevented formal validation.

Comparison of Doppler, oscillometric, auricular and carotid arterial blood pressure measurements in isoflurane anesthetized New Zealand white rabbits.

OBJECTIVE: To assess agreement between carotid arterial pressure and auricular arterial, thoracic limb Doppler or thoracic limb oscillometric blood pressure measurements. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective experimental study. ANIMALS: Six adult New Zealand white rabbits. METHODS: Rabbits were anesthetized with isoflurane in oxygen at 1, 1.5 and 2 MAC on two separate occasions. Catheters in the auricular and the contralateral external carotid artery were connected to calibrated pressure transducers via non-compliant tubing. Inflatable cuffs of width equal to approximately 40% of the limb circumference were placed above the carpus on both thoracic limbs with a Doppler transducer placed distal to the cuff on one. Systolic (SAP) and mean (MAP) arterial blood pressure measurements were obtained at each dose, on each occasion. Agreement between measurement techniques was evaluated by repeated measures Bland Altman analysis with carotid pressure as the reference. Variation in bias over the measurement range was evaluated by regression analysis. RESULTS: Carotid MAP and SAP ranged from 20 to 65 mmHg and 37 to 103 mmHg respectively. Bias and 95% limits of agreement for auricular and oscillometric MAP were 7 (0-14) and -5 (-21-11) mmHg, respectively, and for auricular, oscillometric and Doppler SAP were 23 (8-37), -2 (-24-20) and 13 (-14-39) mmHg, respectively. Bias varied significantly over the measurement range (p < 0.001) for all three SAP techniques but not for MAP measurements. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Limits of agreement for all measurements were large but less so for MAP than SAP. Variation in bias with SAP should be considered when using these measurements clinically.

Comparison of Doppler ultrasonic sphygmomanometry, oscillometry and high-definition oscillometry for non-invasive blood pressure measurement in conscious cats.

OBJECTIVES: Systemic arterial hypertension is a common occurrence and can have serious adverse consequences in cats. Therefore, measuring blood pressure is very important. There are many indirect blood pressure measurement devices available. This study compared Doppler, oscillometric (petMAP Graphic II, SunTech Vet20, the Cardell Insight-X0000) and high-definition oscillometry devices for the non-invasive measurement of blood pressure in conscious cats. METHODS: In this prospective study, blood pressure was measured in 32 cats using the different devices according to the recommendations of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine Consensus Statement. Blood pressures (systolic blood pressure [SBP], diastolic blood pressure [DBP], mean arterial pressure [MAP]), time to complete measurements, number of attempts needed, coefficient of variation (CV) between the blood pressure measurements of the different devices, ease of completing measurements and apparent stress level of the cat were assessed. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between devices in the time taken to obtain blood pressure readings and the number of attempts necessary to obtain six reliable measurements. The CV of the Doppler device was significantly smaller than that of the rest of the devices, but there were no other differences between the devices. The mean SBP, DBP and MAP measured by the petMAP device were significantly higher than the measurements from the other devices. The perceived ease of measurement was not significantly different between the various machines. The perceived level of stress of measurement with the Doppler device was significantly higher compared with the other devices but did not lead to an increased SBP. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Using a Doppler device to measure blood pressure in conscious cats is fast, relatively easy and gives reliable results. A disadvantage is that the Doppler device can only measure SBP, while oscillometric devices also provide DBP and MAP. However, in veterinary medicine, systolic hypertension is considered the most relevant.