Mid-term outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery; statistical challenges in comparison.

BACKGROUND: Despite several studies comparing off- and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the effectiveness and outcomes of off-pump CABG still remain uncertain. METHODS: In this registry-based study, we assessed 8163 patients who underwent isolated CABG between 2014 and 2016. Propensity score matching (PSM), inverse probability of weighting (IPW) and covariate adjustment were performed to correct for and minimize selection bias. RESULTS: The overall mean age of the patients was 62 years, and 25.7% were women. Patients who underwent off-pump CABG had shorter length of hospitalization (p < 0.001), intubation time (p = 0.003) and length of ICU admission (p < 0.001). Off-pump CABG was associated with higher risk of 30-days mortality (OR: 1.7; 95% CI 1.09-2.65; p = 0.019) in unadjusted analysis. After covariate adjustment and matching (PSM and IPW), this difference was not statistically significant. After an average of 36.1 months follow-up, risk of MACCE and all-cause mortality didn't have significant differences in both surgical methods by adjusting with IPW (HR: 1.03; 95% CI 0.87-1.24; p = 0.714; HR: 0.91; 95% CI 0.73-1.14; p = 578, respectively). CONCLUSION: Off-pump and on-pump techniques have similar 30-day mortality (adjusted, PSM and IPW). Off-pump surgery is probably more cost-effective in short term; however, mid-term survival and MACCE trends in both surgical methods are comparable.

Surgeons' Preference for Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgeon's preference is an important factor in clinical strategy for off-pump (OPCAB) or on-pump (ONCAB) coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. This study analyzed surgeons' understanding of and propensity for both techniques. METHODS: A survey was performed by self-reported questionnaire. Two sections were included: Q1 questionnaire investigated each surgeon's opinion on the indications of OPCAB and ONCAB; and Q2 questionnaire investigated each surgeon's choice of OPCAB or ONCAB in different clinical situations. RESULTS: The questionnaires were sent to 169 surgeons. In Q1, 71.2% of surgeons indicated that the degree of overlap between the indications of OPCAB and ONCAB is >70%; 55.1% believed that OPCAB had a wider scope of indications than ONCAB, and 35.3% believed that ONCAB had a wider scope of indications than OPCAB. In Q2, >70% of surgeons who responded chose OPCAB for patients with the following characteristics: high risk of stroke, renal dysfunction, pulmonary dysfunction, malignancy, clotting and coagulation disorders, or age ≥80 years. More than 57.5% of surgeons chose ONCAB for patients with poor target vessels or ventricular enlargement and dysfunction. For novice surgeons, 87.5% of surgeons chose ONCAB. CONCLUSION: Most surgeons surveyed agreed that OPCAB and ONCAB are suitable for most patients; however, surgeons' preference for ONCAB or OPCAB varied. Surgeons are more willing to choose ONCAB in the presence of complicated heart conditions and OPCAB in the presence of serious concomitant diseases.

Extracorporeal life support system during cardiovascular procedures: Insights from the German Lifebridge registry.

The frequency of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device application has increased in recent years. Besides implantation in the emergency setting, such as circulatory arrest, MCS is also increasingly used electively to ensure hemodynamic stability in high-risk patients, for example, during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), valve interventions or off-pump coronary bypass surgery. Lifebridge (Zoll Medical GmbH, Germany) is a compact percutaneous MCS device widely used in daily clinical routine. The present study aimed to investigate the indications, feasibility, and outcomes after use of Lifebridge in cardiac interventions, evaluating a large-scale multicenter database. A total of 60 tertiary cardiovascular centers were questioned regarding application and short-term outcomes after the use of the Lifebridge system (n = 160 patients). Out of these 60 centers, eight consented to participate in the study (n = 39 patients), where detailed data were collected using standardized questionnaires. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patient population, procedural as well as follow-up data were recorded and analyzed. In 60 interrogated centers, Lifebridge was used in 74% of emergency cases and 26% in the setting of planned interventions. The subcohort interrogated in detail displayed the same distribution of application scenarios, while the main cardiovascular procedure was high-risk PCI (82%). All patients were successfully weaned from the device and 92% (n = 36) of the patients studied in detail survived after 30 days. As assessed 30 days after insertion of the device, bleeding requiring red blood cell (RBC) transfusion constituted the main complication, occurring in 49% of cases. In our analysis of clinical data, the use of Lifebridge in cardiac intervention was shown to be feasible. Further prospective studies are warranted to identify patients who benefit from hemodynamic MCS support despite the increased rate of RBC transfusion due to challenges in access sites during cardiovascular procedures.

Outcome of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the immediate and late outcome of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in a multicenter setting. DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective study. SETTING: Four university hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 596 patients were included in this study. INTERVENTIONS: Included patients underwent isolated, emergency CABG. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sixty patients (absolute rate: 10.1%, pooled rate: 8.7%) died during the in-hospital stay period. Increasing emergency CABG classes (p<0.0001), recent myocardial infarction (p=0.019), left ventricular ejection fraction≤30% (p=0.034), on-pump surgery (p=0.012), and participating centers (p<0.0001) were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 86.4%, 81.6%, and 76.1%, respectively. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was used in 6 patients and 3 of them (50.0%) survived the immediate postoperative period. Patient populations of participating centers differed significantly in most of baseline characteristics. The preoperative use of intra-aortic balloon pump (8% to 51%) and off-pump surgery (2.8% to 56.3%) varied significantly between institutions. In-hospital mortality (2.8%, 5.9%, 7.7% and 19.8%, p<0.0001), as well as midterm survival, significantly differed between institutions (at 3 years, 90.6%, 89.8%, 81.2%, and 67.2%, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The outcome after emergency CABG is satisfactory despite a significant operative risk. However, the results of emergency CABG significantly differed between the participating institutions, likely due to differences in the referral pathways and perioperative treatment strategies. Evaluation of these factors is crucial for implementation of treatment in centers with suboptimal results.

Risk Stratification in Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass (OPCAB) Surgery­Role of EuroSCORE II.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the EuroSCORE II for risk stratification in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery. DESIGN: A retrospective observational study. SETTING: Two tertiary care hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 1,211 patients undergoing OPCAB surgery. INTERVENTIONS: No interventions were implemented. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The EuroSCORE II estimated the operative risk for each patient. The calibration of the scoring system was assessed using the Hosmer Lemeshow test, and the discriminative capacity was estimated with area under receiver operating characteristic curves. The incidence, patient characteristics, causes of intraoperative conversion to on-pump coronary artery bypass (ONCAB), and outcome were studied. The all-cause in-hospital mortality was 2.39%. Predicted mortality with the EuroSCORE II was 2.03±1.63. Using the Hosmer Lemeshow test, a C statistic of 8.066 (p = 0.472) was obtained, indicating satisfactory model fit. The calculated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.706 (p = 0.0002), indicating good discriminatory power. Emergency intraoperative conversion to ONCAB occurred in 6.53% of patients. The mortality in the ONCAB group was significantly higher compared with patients who underwent successful OPCAB surgery (15.18% v 1.5%, p<0.0001). On multiple regression analysis with conversion to ONCAB as the endpoint, associated factors were patients with a higher EuroSCORE II (odds ratio = 1.13, confidence interval = 1.03-1.27) and more-than-trivial mitral regurgitation (odds ratio = 1.84, confidence interval = 1.07-3.06). Net reclassification improvement of 0.714 (p<0.0001) was obtained when on-pump conversion was added to the EuroSCORE II. CONCLUSIONS: The EuroSCORE II has satisfactory calibration and discrimination power to predict mortality after OPCAB surgery. Intraoperative conversion to ONCAB is a major complication of OPCAB surgery. A higher EuroSCORE II also predicts higher probability of conversion to ONCAB.

The relationship between cardiotrophin-1 and troponin-i in coronary arterial bypass grafting on the beating heart: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiotrophin-1 (CT-1) is closely associated with many cardiovascular diseases, such as hypertension, myocardial infarction (MI), and heart failure, and exhibits a cardioprotective effect in ischemia-reperfusion injury. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between CT-1 and Troponin-I (Tn-I) in off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) grafting on the beating heart. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients (mean age 60.8 ± 9.7 years, 79.5% male) undergoing elective OPCAB surgery were included in this study undertaken between July 1, 2012 and July 1, 2013 in the Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, University School of Medicine Hospital. Venous blood samples were collected 5 minutes before OPCAB surgery and 6 hours after surgery. Plasma CT-1 levels were measured using the ELISA method. RESULTS: Compared to the preoperative period, Tn-I and CT-1 values were higher in the postoperative period [0.255 ng/mL (0.030-0.430) versus 0.045 ng/mL (0.005-0.090), P < .001; and 33.7 pg/mL (15.8-98.5) versus 8.7 pg/mL (0.68-25.4), P < .001]. There was also an elevation in white blood cells, aspartate aminotransferase, creatine kinase (CK), and creatine kinase MB (CK-MB) values, as well as a decrease in hemoglobin values (P < .001). When a correlation analysis for postoperative CT-1 was performed, there was a significant positive correlation between postoperative CK, CK-MB, and Tn-I levels (r = 0.250, P < .027; r = 0.270, P = .017; and r = 0.241, P < .034). CONCLUSION: CT-1 was found to be associated with Tn-I, which is used to detect myocardial damage after OPCAB surgery. CT-1 may also be used to detect myocardial damage.

On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in high-risk patients.

This study aimed to evaluate on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with a high-risk operative profile.The pre-, intra- and post-operative data of high-risk patients with additive European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (additive Euro-SCORE) over 6 undergoing isolated CABG from January 2008 to December 2011 in this center were investigated and retrospectively analyzed. Using the propensity score-matching method, those patients with similar pre- and intra-operative characteristics were selected and their early clinical outcomes were compared.From January 2008 to December 2011, 485 consecutive patients (398 males, with a mean age of 70.9 ± 9.0 years) whose additive Euro-SCORE was over 6 were entered into this study. Off-pump coronary bypass grafting (OPCAB) was performed in 58.1% (n = 282), and the remaining patients underwent conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CCABG). After propensity score matching, the two groups of patients (90 OPCAB patients versus 90 CCABG patients) were similar with regard to pre- and intra-operative characteristics but not duration of surgical procedure. No significant differences in hospital mortality were found. Compared to CCABG, high-risk patients undergoing OPCAB had significantly lower prevalence of postoperative respiratory failure and postoperative renal failure (6.7% versus 17.8%, P = 0.0386, 5.6% versus 16.7%, P = 0.0307, respectively). Through multivariate logistic regression analysis, type of procedure (CCABG versus OPCAB), as an independent risk factor, had an impact on the postoperative respiratory failure (OR = 2.36, 95%CI 1.44-4.97, P = 0.0312) and postoperative renal failure (OR = 2.86, 95%CI 1.61-5.81, P = 0.0037).Compared with CCABG, OPCAB reduced postoperative respiratory and renal morbidity in high-risk patients.

Benefits of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in high-risk patients.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCAB) compared with conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CCAB) remain controversial. Thus, it is important to investigate which patient subgroups may benefit the most from OPCAB rather than CCAB. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among the patients undergoing first coronary revascularization enrolled in the CREDO-Kyoto Registry (a registry of first-time percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft patients in Japan), 2468 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft were entered into the study (mean age, 67 ± 9 years). Predicted risk of operative mortality (PROM) of each patient was calculated by logistic EuroSCORE. Patients were divided into tertile based on their PROM. Mortality rates and the incidences of cardiovascular events were compared between CCAB and OPCAB within each PROM tertile using propensity score analysis. A total of 1377 patients received CCAB whereas 1091 received OPCAB. Adjusted 30-day mortality was not significantly different between CCAB and OPCAB patients regardless of their PROM range. However, the odds ratio of 30-day stroke in CCAB compared with OPCAB in the high-risk tertile was 8.30 (95% confidence interval, 2.25-30.7; P<0.01). Regarding long-term outcomes, hazard ratio of stroke in CCAB compared with OPCAB in the high-risk tertile was 1.80 (95% confidence interval, 1.07-3.02; P=0.03). Nevertheless, hazard ratio of overall mortality in the high-risk tertile was 1.44 (95% confidence interval, 0.98-2.11; P=0.06), indicating no statistically significant difference between the 2 procedures. CONCLUSIONS: OPCAB as opposed to CCAB is associated with short-term and long-term benefits in stroke prevention in patients at higher risk as estimated by EuroSCORE. No survival benefit of OPCAB was shown regardless of preoperative risk level.

Clampless off-pump versus conventional coronary artery revascularization: a propensity score analysis of 788 patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess if clampless off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) decreases risk-adjusted mortality, stroke rate, and morbidity in unselected patients in comparison to conventional CABG. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between July 2009 and November 2010, data of 1282 consecutive patients undergoing isolated CABG were prospectively recorded. In 30.8% (n=395), clampless off-pump revascularization was used, either with the PAS-Port automated central venous anastomosis system (n=310) or as total arterial revascularization without central anastomoses (n=85). Propensity score (PS) matching was performed based on 15 preoperative risk variables to correct for selection bias. In-hospital mortality and stroke rate as primary end point, as well as major complications and follow-up outcome of clampless off-pump (lessOPCAB) and conventional CABG (cCABG) were compared in 394 matched patient pairs (total: 788 patients). The clampless off-pump technique decreased the in-hospital rate of death (odds ratio, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-1.18, P=0.080) and stroke (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.99, P=0.048) significantly. Complications such as low cardiac output syndrome, prolonged ventilation and rethoracotomy were also reduced by lessOPCAB. Over a 2-year follow-up period overall survival, cerebrovascular and major adverse event rate were significantly lower in the lessOPCAB group, while the repeat revascularization rate was comparable. CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective PS-matched analysis, clampless off-pump CABG lowers mortality, stroke rate and other morbidity in an unselected group of patients with coronary artery disease.

In-hospital outcomes of pedicled bilateral internal mammary artery use in diabetic and nondiabetic patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: single-surgeon, single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE: A common perception is that use of pedicled bilateral internal mammary arteries (BIMA) increases the risk of sternal wound complications in diabetic patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The purpose of this study was to compare the in-hospital outcomes of CABG using pedicled BIMA in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. METHODS: From September 1998 to September 2010, 390 consecutive diabetic patients and 519 nondiabetic patients underwent isolated off-pump CABG using pedicled BIMA. The 2 groups had comparable preoperative demographics except for a higher prevalence of acute myocardial infarction (18.9% versus 6.1%, P = .01), peripheral vascular disease (17.2% versus 2.7%, P = .001), an ejection fraction <30% (17.7% versus 8.5%, P = .02), and chronic renal failure (4.5% versus 0.9%, P = .01) in the diabetic patients. RESULTS: The operative mortality rate of the diabetic patients was comparable to that of the nondiabetic patients (2.8% versus 2.1%, P = .87). The in-hospital outcomes, including occurrence of superficial and deep sternal wound infections, were similar except for an increased occurrence of wound infection at the vein harvest site (6.6% versus 1.1%, P = .04) and a need for hemofiltration (11.8% versus 2.1%, P = .02) in the diabetic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Pedicled BIMA use is associated with comparable incidences of sternal wound complications and other outcomes in diabetic patients and nondiabetic patients. Strict perioperative glycemic control, adherence to meticulous closure technique, and postoperative management of surgical wounds can make pedicled BIMA use a default strategy for diabetic patients.

[Off-pump coronary surgery. Experience in 220 patients]. / Resultados inmediatos y a mediano plazo de la cirugía coronaria sin circulación extracorpórea.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass graft surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is an alternative technique for myocardial revascularization. AIM: To report the early results and 4 years follow up of the first 220 cases operated with this technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Descriptive study of 220 patients aged 60.6 ± 8.8 years (171 men) undergoing off-pump coronary surgery between 2004 and 2008. One hundred seventy six (80%) patients had hypertension, 59 (26.8%) had diabetes, 86 (39%) dyslipidemia and 85 (38.6%) were smokers. One hundred forty one patients (64.1%) had stable angina. Fifty four (24.5%) had a recent infarction (< 90 days) and 46 (20.9%) had a previous angioplasty. Ejection fraction was < 30% in 9 (4.1%), 30% - 50% in 57 (25.9%) and > 50% in 154 (70%). Additive and logistic EuroSCORE were 3.32 and 3.55% respectively. We studied the complications and mortality at 30 days. Long term follow up (late mortality and major cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction (MI) stroke and re-intervention were assessed using data of medical records and National Identification Registry Service until June 30, 2011. RESULTS: A total of 481 bypasses were performed (2.27 bypasses l patient). There were 4 (1.8%) conversions and no incomplete revascularization. Post-Operative complications occurred in 42 patients. Eight neurological (five strokes), five renal (two required dialysis), 16 cardiovascular (four myocardial infarctions), 15 surgical and 11 infections. Three patients died (1.36%). After a follow up of 4.26 ± 1.02 years, overall survival was 92.3%, and survival free of myocardial infarction, stroke or re - intervention was 96.8%, 96.8% and 95.9% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump coronary surgery in selected patients has immediate and late results comparable to traditional surgery.

[Beating heart coronary artery bypass: 100 cases]. / Pontage coronaire à coeur battant : A propos de 100 cas.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery revascularization with cardiopulmonary bypass has been reported to carry several risks. AIM: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting has been proposed to result in a better outcome. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of off-pump cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: In a 7-year period, a total of 100 patients undergoing isolated first-time off-pump coronary artery bypass graft were studied. The mean ejection fractions was 48% and the EUROSCORE mean was 4.9. RESULTS: The average number of grafts was 1.55 per patient. The postoperative outcomes were simple for most patients with little use of inotropes after 24 hours (42%), few cases of atrial fibrillation (9.4%), and transfusion (27.3%). Time to extubation was less than 48 hours in most cases (94.7%) and hospital mortality rate was 10.5%. CONCLUSION: The beating heart bypass surgery allows good immediate results including multi-vessel disease and in patients at high risk.

Cardiac surgery in Germany during 2011: a report on behalf of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

All cardiac surgical procedures performed in 78 German cardiac surgical units throughout the year 2011 are presented in this report, based on a voluntary registry which is organized by the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. In 2011, a total of 100,291 cardiac surgical procedures (implantable cardioverter defibrillator and pacemakers procedures excluded) have been collected in this registry. More than 13.4% of the patients were older than 80 years compared with 12.4% in 2010. Hospital mortality in 41,976 isolated coronary artery bypass graft procedures (14.7% off-pump) was 2.9%. In 26,972 isolated valve procedures (including 5,210 catheter-based procedures), an in-hospital mortality of 5.2% has been observed.This voluntary registry of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery will continue to be an important tool enabling quality control and illustrating current facts and the development of cardiac surgery in Germany.

Application of lower sternal incision with on-pump, beating heart intracardiac procedures in congenital heart disease.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to explore the application of lower sternal incision with on-pump, beating heart intracardiac procedures for the treatment of congenital heart disease. METHODS: A total of 106 cases with congenital heart disease were performed with lower sternal incision under the beating heart condition. The sternum was sawed open to the third sternocostal joint through a small incision in the lower sternum. Cardiopulmonary bypass was developed without aortic cross-clamping. The simultaneous left atrium and ventricle suction and integrating sequential deairing procedure was established to improve the exposure of the surgical field and intraoperative de-airing. We also randomly selected 100 patients with similar disease and age as controls. These control patients underwent middle sternal incision surgery with arresting heart. RESULTS: The results showed that all the patients were successfully completed with the surgery without death and serious complications, eg, air embolism, residual shunt, and complete atrioventricular block. The operative and cardiopulmonary bypass time in the experimental group was not significantly different from that in the control group. The length of the skin incision in the experimental group was shortened by 4.8 cm compared to that in the control group. The incidence of sternal deformity in patients under 3 years old in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Lower sternal incision with beating heart can reduce the surgical injury, simplify the operation procedure, and improve the therapeutic efficacy. It is a safe and effective approach for the treatment of congenital heart disease.

Increasing long-term major vascular events and resource consumption in patients receiving off-pump coronary artery bypass: a single-center prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Despite its widespread use and short-term efficacy, substantial uncertainty remains about the long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB). METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was conducted of 6665 consecutive patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) at our institution during 1999 to 2006. All patients were followed up until September 30, 2008. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between OPCAB and conventional CABG. The 2 main long-term outcome measures were repeat revascularization and the composite outcome of major vascular events. Cost comparison at 2 years in a propensity-matched sample during follow-up was also a study interest. The overall mean baseline age was 60.3+/-8.6 years, and 17.0% were women. Compared with conventional CABG, patients who underwent OPCAB had lower rates of atrial fibrillation (P=0.003) and requirements for blood transfusion (P=0.03) and ventilation time >24 hours (P<0.001). After an average of 4.5 years of follow-up, the rates of repeat revascularization (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 1.89) and major vascular events (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.09 to 1.39) were significantly higher in the OPCAB than the conventional CABG group. At 2 years, OPCAB was associated with increased additional direct costs per patient compared with conventional CABG and had a similar survival rate. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional CABG, OPCAB is associated with small short-term gain but increased long-term risks of repeat revascularization and major vascular events, especially among high-risk patients. Moreover, OPCAB consumes more resources and is less cost-effective in the long run.

Transfusion requirements in 811 patients during and after cardiac surgery: a prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify patients at risk for intra- and postoperative blood product transfusion in a mixed adult cardiac surgical patient population. DESIGN: A prospective, observational study. SETTING: A single-center university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n = 811) undergoing cardiac surgery from January 1, 2008, to November 30, 2008. INTERVENTIONS: The outcome in terms of transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and/or pooled platelets within the first 24 hours after surgery was studied. Pre- and perioperative risk factors for bleeding and transfusion of blood products were studied. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The majority of RBCs and FFP (>70%) were given to a minority of patients (<12%). The type of surgical procedure, previous cardiac surgery, and emergency operations were all significantly associated with the transfusion of RBCs, FFP, and platelets. Antithrombotic therapy was not significantly associated with the transfusion requirement in the mixed group of cardiac patients. However, in the low-risk procedures such as coronary artery bypass graft surgery, ongoing antithrombotic therapy at the time of the operation significantly increased the risk of transfusion in this otherwise low-risk category of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of high-risk patients is necessary to optimize the perioperative management of bleeding complications. Because of the high variability in transfusion requirements, a specifically tailored patient intervention based on the individual's risk profile appears more likely to improve patient outcome compared with general interventions given to the entire patient group.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in a low-volume center.

BACKGROUND: The advantages of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) are well documented; however, the conversion of OPCAB to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with higher morbidity and mortality. This issue is of particular concern in low-volume centers or centers that are beginning to use OPCAB. We present an OPCAB methodology that uses a maximum number of arterial grafts. METHODS: We routinely use OPCAB in every patient unless there is another associated condition. We used the following methods to improve the safety of OPCAB: (1) maintaining normothermia, (2) routine use of a pulmonary artery catheter, (3) routine use of a femoral arterial line, (4) routine use of a cell saver, and (5) complete revascularization. RESULTS: We included 173 consecutive patients in the study. All patients underwent OPCAB without any conversion to CPB. Hemodynamic compromise in 5 patients (2.89%) required insertion of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). OPCAB was completed in all 5 patients after IABP insertion. Blood transfusions (BTs) were avoided in 55 patients (31.8%), and 68 patients (39.3%) required ≤2 units of blood. CONCLUSION: The OPCAB technique is still evolving. Low-volume centers have higher rates of conversion to CPB. Hypotension due to an impaired left ventricular function can be successfully treated by using an IABP. Although blood loss can be managed with BTs, use of a cell saver helps to reduce the number of BTs. We conclude that our technique of total arterial OPCAB using a cell saver can be safely performed in a low-volume center.

Left anterior descending artery revascularization in low-risk patients: early outcomes after off-pump versus on-pump surgery.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: This study aimed to compare the early outcomes of off-pump and on-pump myocardial revascularization in patients with stenosis in the left anterior descending artery (alone or with diagonal artery disease). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 300 patients: 150 who underwent on-pump coronary artery bypass and 150 who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with respect to medical data and operative findings. On-pump and off-pump groups were compared in terms of mortality and morbidity within 30 days of the operation. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 3.3% (5 patients) in the on-pump group and 2.6% (4 patients) in the off-pump group. Five patients (3.3%) in the on-pump group experienced myocardial infarction; 3 died of cardiogenic shock. Four patients (2.6%) in the off-pump group experienced myocardial infarction, and 2 of these patients died. Two patients (1.3%) in the on-pump group and 2 patients (1.3%) in the off-pump group experienced stroke; 1 patient in each group died. One patient (0.6%) in the on-pump group had mediastinitis and died of sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: Among low-risk patients (defined according to EuroSCORE criteria) who underwent left anterior descending coronary artery bypass, the results obtained with the on-pump and off-pump methods showed no significant differences with respect to morbidity or mortality.

Resource utilization in off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting in a community hospital: a comparative analysis using propensity scoring.

BACKGROUND: At a time when cost containment in health care is under increased scrutiny, coronary artery bypass grafting remains the most widely performed cardiac surgical procedure in the world. This study compares 30-day mortality, morbidity, and resource use for off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) versus conventional coronary artery bypass (CCAB) revascularization. METHODS: From January 2000 through December 2008, 1003 patients underwent OPCAB grafting by a single surgeon (S.C.S.). Data were prospectively collected, entered into a Society of Thoracic Surgeons adult cardiac surgery database, and analyzed retrospectively. We used propensity-matching techniques to match this cohort to a group of 1003 patients who underwent CCAB. RESULTS: The hospital mortality rate was lower for the OPCAB patients than for the CCAB patients: 2.0% (20/1003) versus 2.8% (28/1003). Predictors of hospital mortality for the entire cohort included age (P = .001), cardiogenic shock (P = .001), congestive heart failure (P = .019), history of myocardial infarction (P = .001), and reoperation (P = .007). The overall incidence of morbidity was lower for the OPCAB patients (reoperation for bleeding, P = .011; prolonged ventilation, P = .035; stroke, P = .045; cardiac arrest, P = .004). OPCAB patients experienced significantly reduced procedure times (P = .001), postoperative ventilation times (P = .035), post-operative lengths of stay (P = .035), and blood product use (intraoperative, P = .001; postoperative, P = .001). CONCLUSION: These outcomes clearly demonstrate that OPCAB is a safe and effective procedure for myocardial revascularization. This retrospective, nonrandomized observational study has shown that the patients who underwent OPCAB had reduced morbidity and mortality, as well as decreased resource use, compared with those who underwent CCAB.

Process review of a departmental change from conventional coronary artery bypass grafting to totally arterial coronary artery bypass and its effects on the incidence and severity of postoperative stroke.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the process of changing from conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to totally arterial off-pump coronary artery bypass (TOPCAB) at a single heart center in Germany. METHODS: We (1) used multivariate statistical methods to assess real-time monitoring of OPCAB effects, (2) conducted a case review to assess preventable deaths and identify areas of improvement, (3) conducted a team survey, and (4) evaluated benchmarking results. RESULTS: All surgeons and assistants (n = 18) at this center were involved and were guided by the department head and one of the consultants, who was trained in this procedure in 2004 at the Leuven OPCAB school. The frequency of OPCAB operations increased abruptly in 2005 from 5% to 43% and then increased gradually to 67% (n = 546) by 2008 (total, 1781 OPCAB cases and 1563 on-pump cases). The in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates for OPCAB surgeries (n = 10 [0.6%] and 21 [1.2%], respectively) were lower than for on-pump surgeries (n = 27 [1.7%] and 26 [1.7%], respectively). Stroke rates were also lower for OPCAB surgeries (7 cases [0.4%] versus 15 cases [1%]). The lower risk of stroke in the OPCAB group was significant (P < .05) after risk adjustment. Monitoring curves and case reviews demonstrated a preventable death percentage of at least 30%. The attitude of the team was mostly positive because of the promising results (eg, fewer strokes, increasing TOPCAB popularity, and a top national rank). CONCLUSIONS: The change from conventional CABG to TOPCAB was effective in decreasing the incidence and severity of stroke, in developing a team routine and a positive team attitude, and in producing excellent benchmarking results. The presence of a training and communication deficiency at the beginning of the study suggested an area for further improvement. After 6 years TOPCAB had largely replaced conventional CABG.