Quality improvement project aiming to reduce inappropriate use of abdominal x-rays in the ED.

BACKGROUND: There is compelling evidence that AXRs have limited clinical value in the acute setting. Despite this, they are frequently used in many EDs. This quality improvement project (QIP) aimed to reduce unnecessary AXR use in a single-centre ED. METHOD: All consecutive AXRs conducted on patients aged 16 years and above in a District General Hospital ED in England between 2 August 2021 and 5 June 2022 were included. This period of time was divided into a pre-intervention and intervention period, during which iterative plan-do-study-act cycles were undertaken to implement a wide range of educational and system level interventions. RESULTS: 501 AXRs were performed during the QIP. The average number of AXRs per fortnight fell from 27.5 during the preintervention period to 17.6 during the intervention period and met criteria for special cause variation. No special cause variation in CT usage was observed, with an average number of 70.7 and 74 CT abdomen-pelvis scans during the preintervention and intervention periods, respectively. 119 (23.8%) AXRs showed acute and clinically significant findings, and of this group 118/119 (99.2%) underwent further imaging. In contrast, 382 (76.2%) AXRs had no acute or clinically significant findings, and of this group 344/382 (90.1%) proceeded to further imaging. CONCLUSION: In this single-centre QIP, coordinated multidisciplinary interventions were effective in reducing unnecessary AXR usage without resulting in excess CTs. The methods and interventions described are easily reproducible at minimal expense and may be of interest to other departments undertaking quality improvement work in this area.

Expanding the Concept of Diagnostic Reference Levels to Noise and Dose Reference Levels in CT.

OBJECTIVE. Diagnostic reference levels were developed as guidance for radiation dose in medical imaging and, by inference, diagnostic quality. The objective of this work was to expand the concept of diagnostic reference levels to explicitly include noise of CT examinations to simultaneously target both dose and quality through corresponding reference values. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study consisted of 2851 adult CT examinations performed with scanners from two manufacturers and two clinical protocols: abdominopelvic CT with IV contrast administration and chest CT without IV contrast administration. An institutional informatics system was used to automatically extract protocol type, patient diameter, volume CT dose index, and noise magnitude from images. The data were divided into five reference patient size ranges. Noise reference level, noise reference range, dose reference level, and dose reference range were defined for each size range. RESULTS. The data exhibited strong dependence between dose and patient size, weak dependence between noise and patient size, and different trends for different manufacturers with differing strategies for tube current modulation. The results suggest size-based reference intervals and levels for noise and dose (e.g., noise reference level and noise reference range of 11.5-12.9 HU and 11.0-14.0 HU for chest CT and 10.1-12.1 HU and 9.4-13.7 HU for abdominopelvic CT examinations) that can be targeted to improve clinical performance consistency. CONCLUSION. New reference levels and ranges, which simultaneously consider image noise and radiation dose information across wide patient populations, were defined and determined for two clinical protocols. The methods of new quantitative constraints may provide unique and useful information about the goal of managing the variability of image quality and dose in clinical CT examinations.

Assessment of image quality in abdominal CT: potential dose reduction with model-based iterative reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To estimate potential dose reduction in abdominal CT by visually comparing images reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and strengths of 3 and 5 of a specific MBIR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A dual-source scanner was used to obtain three data sets each for 50 recruited patients with 30, 70 and 100% tube loads (mean CTDIvol 1.9, 3.4 and 6.2 mGy). Six image criteria were assessed independently by five radiologists. Potential dose reduction was estimated with Visual Grading Regression (VGR). RESULTS: Comparing 30 and 70% tube load, improved image quality was observed as a significant strong effect of log tube load and reconstruction method with potential dose reduction relative to FBP of 22-47% for MBIR strength 3 (p < 0.001). For MBIR strength 5 no dose reduction was possible for image criteria 1 (liver parenchyma), but dose reduction between 34 and 74% was achieved for other criteria. Interobserver reliability showed agreement of 71-76% (κw 0.201-0.286) and intra-observer reliability of 82-96% (κw 0.525-0.783). CONCLUSION: MBIR showed improved image quality compared to FBP with positive correlation between MBIR strength and increasing potential dose reduction for all but one image criterion. KEY POINTS: • MBIR's main advantage is its de-noising properties, which facilitates dose reduction. • MBIR allows for potential dose reduction in relation to FBP. • Visual Grading Regression (VGR) produces direct numerical estimates of potential dose reduction. • MBIR strengths 3 and 5 dose reductions were 22-34 and 34-74%. • MBIR strength 5 demonstrates inferior performance for liver parenchyma.

Quality of pediatric abdominal CT scans performed at a dedicated children's hospital and its referring institutions: a multifactorial evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric patients requiring transfer to a dedicated children's hospital from an outside institution may undergo CT imaging as part of their evaluation. Whether this imaging is performed prior to or after transfer has been shown to impact the radiation dose imparted to the patient. Other quality variables could also be affected by the pediatric experience and expertise of the scanning institution. OBJECTIVE: To identify differences in quality between abdominal CT scans and reports performed at a dedicated children's hospital, and those performed at referring institutions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty consecutive pediatric abdominal CT scans performed at outside institutions were matched (for age, gender and indication) with 50 CT scans performed at a dedicated freestanding children's hospital. We analyzed the scans for technical parameters, report findings, correlation with final clinical diagnosis, and clinical utility. Technical evaluation included use of intravenous and oral contrast agents, anatomical coverage, number of scan phases and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) for each scan. Outside institution scans were re-reported when the child was admitted to the children's hospital; they were also re-interpreted for this study by children's hospital radiologists who were provided with only the referral information given in the outside institution's report. Anonymized original outside institutional reports and children's hospital admission re-reports were analyzed by two emergency medicine physicians for ease of understanding, degree to which the clinical question was answered, and level of confidence in the report. RESULTS: Mean SSDE was lower (8.68) for children's hospital scans, as compared to outside institution scans (13.29, P = 0.03). Concordance with final clinical diagnosis was significantly lower for original outside institution reports (38/48, 79%) than for both the admission and study children's hospital reports (48/50, 96%; P = 0.005). Children's hospital admission reports were rated higher than outside institution reports for completeness, ease of understanding, answering of clinical question, and level of confidence of the report (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pediatric abdominal CT scans performed and interpreted at a dedicated children's hospital are associated with higher technical quality, lower radiation dose and a more clinically useful report than those performed at referring institutions.

Agreement and reproducibility of radiological signs in NEC using The Duke Abdominal Assessment Scale (DAAS).

PURPOSE: Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Abdominal radiography is currently an imaging modality of choice in NEC. Recently, a numeric scale of radiological signs in NEC-The Duke Abdominal Assessment (DAAS) was introduced. The aim of this study was to measure the intra- and inter-observer agreement on the radiological signs of NEC according to DAAS to access the feasibility of this scale. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have retrospectively analyzed 87 radiographs performed in a group of 43 high-risk neonates with suspected NEC. Radiographs were assessed by 6 independent observers: two pediatric radiologists, two radiology residents, and two neonatologists. Data were analyzed using κ statistics as a measure of intra- and inter-observer agreement. RESULTS: Fair-to-good intra-observer agreement was noted for all but one of observers. However, with the wide range in κ values, we found only fair inter-observer agreement detecting signs of NEC according to DAAS. There was a higher intra-group agreement in radiology practitioners, with the highest among experienced pediatric radiologists. CONCLUSION: However, with high observer variability in interpretation of all radiologic signs, we did not confirm that Duke Abdominal Assessment Scale could reliable facilitate reporting of abdominal radiographic findings in neonates with suspected NEC.

Impact of the scout view orientation on the radiation exposure and image quality in thoracic and abdominal CT.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of the scout view orientation on radiation exposure and image quality in thoracoabdominal CT, when automated tube voltage selection (ATVS) and automated tube current modulation (ATCM) are used in combination with scan planning on a single scout view. METHODS: Fifty patients underwent two thoracoabdominal CT examinations, one planned on an anteroposterior scout view, one planned on a lateral scout view. Both examinations included contrast-enhanced imaging of chest (CH) and abdomen (AB) and non-contrast-enhanced imaging of the liver (LI). For all examinations the same imaging protocol was used on the same dual-source CT scanner. The radiation exposure was recorded and objective as well as visual image quality was assessed for all examinations. RESULTS: The median dose-length product was significantly lower in scans planned on a lateral scout view (CH: 179 vs. 218 mGy*cm, LI: 148 vs. 178 mGy*cm, AB: 324 vs. 370 mGy*cm, p < 0.0001). Objective image quality was marginal lower in scans planned on a lateral scout view, whereas the visual image quality was rated as equal. CONCLUSION: At the tested radiation doses, the orientation of the scout view has a significant impact on the radiation exposure but no clinically relevant impact on the image quality. KEY POINTS: • The scout view orientation has a significant impact on the radiation exposure. • The scout view orientation has no clinically relevant impact on image quality. • A lateral scout view should be preferred with regard to radiation exposure.

Criteria for radiologic diagnosis of hypochondroplasia in neonates.

BACKGROUND: A radiologic diagnosis of hypochondroplasia is hampered by the absence of age-dependent radiologic criteria, particularly in the neonatal period. OBJECTIVE: To establish radiologic criteria and scoring system for identifying neonates with fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3)-associated hypochondroplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 7 hypochondroplastic neonates and 30 controls. All subjects underwent radiologic examination within 28 days after birth. We evaluated parameters reflecting the presence of (1) short ilia, (2) squared ilia, (3) short greater sciatic notch, (4) horizontal acetabula, (5) short femora, (6) broad femora, (7) metaphyseal flaring, (8) lumbosacral interpedicular distance narrowing and (9) ovoid radiolucency of the proximal femora. RESULTS: Only parameters 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6 were statistically different between the two groups. Parameters 3, 5 and 6 did not overlap between the groups, while parameters 1 and 4 did. Based on these results, we propose a scoring system for hypochondroplasia. Two major criteria (parameters 3 and 6) were assigned scores of 2, whereas 4 minor criteria (parameters 1, 4, 5 and 9) were assigned scores of 1. All neonates with hypochondroplasia in our material scored ≥6. CONCLUSION: Our set of diagnostic radiologic criteria might be useful for early identification of hypochondroplastic neonates.

Evaluation of digital radiography practice using exposure index tracking.

Some digital radiography (DR) detectors and software allow for remote download of exam statistics, including image reject status, body part, projection, and exposure index (EI). The ability to have automated data collection from multiple DR units is conducive to a quality control (QC) program monitoring institutional radiographic exposures. We have implemented such a QC program with the goal to identify outliers in machine radiation output and opportunities for improvement in radiation dose levels. We studied the QC records of four digital detectors in greater detail on a monthly basis for one year. Although individual patient entrance skin exposure varied, the radiation dose levels to the detectors were made to be consistent via phototimer recalibration. The exposure data stored on each digital detector were periodically downloaded in a spreadsheet format for analysis. EI median and stan-dard deviation were calculated for each protocol (by body part) and EI histograms were created for torso protocols. When histograms of EI values for different units were compared, we observed differences up to 400 in average EI (representing 60% difference in radiation levels to the detector) between units nominally cali-brated to the same EI. We identified distinct components of the EI distributions, which in some cases, had mean EI values 300 apart. Peaks were observed at the current calibrated EI, a previously calibrated EI, and an EI representing computed radiography (CR) techniques. Our findings in this ongoing project have allowed us to make useful interventions, from emphasizing the use of phototimers instead of institutional memory of manual techniques to improvements in our phototimer calibration. We believe that this QC program can be implemented at other sites and can reveal problems with radiation levels in the aggregate that are difficult to identify on a case-by-case basis.

Evaluation of dose-area product of common radiographic examinations towards establishing a preliminary diagnostic reference levels (PDRLs) in Southwestern Nigeria.

In Nigeria, a large number of radiographic examinations are conducted yearly for various diagnostic purposes. However, most examinations carried out do not have records of doses received by the patients, and the employed exposure parameters used are not documented; therefore, adequate radiation dose management is hin-dered. The aim of the present study was to estimate the dose-area product (DAP) of patients examined in Nigeria, and to propose regional reference dose levels for nine common examinations (chest PA, abdomen AP, pelvis AP, lumbar AP, skull AP, leg AP, knee AP, hand AP, and thigh AP) undertaken in Nigeria. Measurement of entrance surface dose (ESD) was carried out using thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD). Measured ESDS were converted into DAP using the beam area of patients in 12 purposely selected hospitals. Results of the study show that the maximum/ minimum ratio ranged from 3 for thigh AP to 57 in abdomen AP. The range of determined mean and 75th percentile DAPs were 0.18-17.16, and 0.25-28.59 Gy cm2, respectively. Data available for comparison show that 75th percentile DAPs in this study (in chest PA, abdomen AP, pelvis AP, lumbar AP) are higher than NRPB-HPE reference values. The DAP in this study is higher by factor of 31.4 (chest PA), 9.9 (abdomen AP), 2.2 (pelvis AP), and 2.1 (lumbar AP) than NRPB-HPE values. The relative higher dose found in this study shows nonoptimization of practice in Nigeria. It is expected that regular dose auditing and dose optimization implementation in Nigeria would lead to lower DAP value, especially in abdomen AP. The 75th percentile DAP distribution reported in this study could be taken as regional diagnostic reference level in the Southwestern Nigeria; however, a more extensive nationwide dose survey is required to establish national reference dose.

Estimates of diagnostic reference levels for pediatric peripheral and abdominal fluoroscopically guided procedures.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to survey radiation dose indexes of pediatric peripheral and abdominal fluoroscopically guided procedures from which estimates of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) can be proposed for both a standard fluoroscope and a novel fluoroscope with advanced image processing and lower radiation dose rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiation dose structured reports were retrospectively collected for 408 clinical pediatric cases: Half of the procedures were performed with a standard imaging technology and half with a novel x-ray technology. Dose-area product (DAP), air Kerma (AK), fluoroscopy time, number of digital subtraction angiography images, and patient mass were collected to calculate and normalize radiation dose indexes for procedures completed with the standard and novel fluoroscopes. RESULTS: The study population was composed of 180 and 175 patients who underwent procedures with the standard and novel technology, respectively. The 21 different types of pediatric peripheral and abdominal interventional procedures produced 408 total studies. Median ages, mass and body mass index, fluoroscopy time per procedure, and total number of recorded images for the standard and novel technologies were not statistically different. The area of the x-ray beams was square at the level of the patient with a dimension of 10-13 cm. The dose reduction achieved with the novel fluoroscope ranged from 18% to 51% of the dose required with the standard fluoroscope. The median DAP and AK patient dose indexes were 0.38 Gy · cm(2) and 4.00 mGy, respectively, for the novel fluoroscope. CONCLUSION: Estimates of dose indexes of pediatric peripheral and abdominal fluoroscopically guided, clinical procedures should assist in the development of DRLs to foster management of radiation doses of pediatric patients.

Normal pediatric postmortem CT appearances.

Postmortem radiology is a rapidly developing specialty that is increasingly used as an adjunct to or substitute for conventional autopsy. The goal is to find patterns of disease and possibly the cause of death. Postmortem CT images bring to light processes of decomposition most radiologists are unfamiliar with. These postmortem changes, such as the formation of gas and edema, should not be mistaken for pathological processes that occur in living persons. In this review we discuss the normal postmortem thoraco-abdominal changes and how these appear on CT images, as well as how to differentiate these findings from those of pathological processes.

Local diagnostic reference level based on size-specific dose estimates: assessment of pediatric abdominal/pelvic computed tomography at a Japanese national children's hospital.

BACKGROUND: A child's body size is not accurately reflected by volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP). Size-specific dose estimation (SSDE) was introduced recently as a new index of radiation dose. However, it has not yet been established as a diagnostic reference level (DRL). OBJECTIVE: To calculate the SSDE of abdominal/pelvic CT and compare the SSDE with CTDIvol. To calculate the DRLs of CTDIvol and SSDE. Our hypotheses are: SSDE values will be greater than CTDIvol, and our DRL will be smaller than the known DRLs of other countries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CTDIvol and DLP of 117 children who underwent abdominal/pelvic CT were collected retrospectively. The SSDE was calculated from the sum of the lateral and anteroposterior diameters. The relationships between body weight and effective diameter and between effective diameter and CTDIvol/SSDE were compared. Further, the local DRL was compared with the DRLs of other countries. RESULTS: Body weight and effective diameter and effective diameter and SSDE were positively correlated. In children ages 1, 5 and 10 years, the SSDE is closer to the exposure dose of CTDIvol for the 16-cm phantom, while in children ages 15 years, the SSDE falls between CTDIvol for the 16-cm phantom and that for the 32-cm phantom. The local DRL was lower than those of other countries. CONCLUSION: With SSDE, the radiation dose increased with increasing body weight. Since SSDE takes body size into account, it proved to be a useful indicator for estimating the exposure dose.

Assessment of patient dose and optimization levels in chest and abdomen CR examinations at referral hospitals in Tanzania.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiation doses to patient during chest and abdomen CR examinations, and assess the related level of optimization at five referral hospitals in Tanzania. The international code of practice for dosimetry in diagnostic radiology was applied to determine the entrance surface air kerma (ESAK) to patients. The level of optimization was assessed from low-contrast objects scores of phantom images at different exposures. The results show that mean ESAK varied from 0.16 to 0.37 mGy for chest PA and from 2 to 6 mGy for abdomen AP. Assuming similar patient and phantom attenuations, the optimization performed at all facilities was consistent with phantom evaluations in terms of tube potential settings in use. However, all facilities seemed to operate at higher tube load values above 5 mAs for chest examination, which can lead to unnecessary patient doses. Inadequate initial training on CR technology explains in large proportion the inappropriate use of exposure parameters.

Adult exposures from MDCT including multiphase studies: first Italian nationwide survey.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the radiation dose in routine multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) examinations in Italian population. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicentre study included 5,668 patients from 65 radiology departments who had undergone common CT protocols: head, chest, abdomen, chest­abdomen­pelvis (CAP), spine and cardiac. Data included patient characteristics, CT parameters, volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) for each CT acquisition phase. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and a multi-regression analysis was used to outline the main factors affecting exposure. RESULTS: The 75th percentiles of CTDIvol (mGy) and DLP (mGy cm) for whole head were 69 mGy and 1,312 mGy cm, respectively; for chest, 15 mGy and 569 mGy cm; spine, 42 mGy and 888 mGy cm; cardiac, 7 mGy and 131 mGy cm for calcium score, and 61 mGy and 1,208 mGy cm for angiographic CT studies. High variability was present in the DLP of abdomen and CAP protocols, where multiphase examinations dominated (71 % and 73 % respectively): for abdomen, 18 mGy, with 555 and 920 mGy cm in abdomen and abdomen­pelvis acquisitions respectively; for CAP, 17 mGy, with 508, 850 and 1,200 mGy cm in abdomen, abdomen­pelvis and CAP acquisitions respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of this survey could help in the definition of updated diagnostic reference levels (DRL). KEY POINTS: • Radiation dose associated with multidetector CT (MDCT) is an important health issue. • This national survey assessed dose exposures of 5,668 patients undergoing MDCT. • Dose indices correlate with BMI, voltage, rotation time, pitch and tube current. • These results may contribute to an update of national diagnostic reference levels.

Dose reduction with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for paediatric CT: phantom study and clinical experience on chest and abdomen CT.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefit and limits of iterative reconstruction of paediatric chest and abdominal computed tomography (CT). METHODS: The study compared adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) with filtered back projection (FBP) on 64-channel MDCT. A phantom study was first performed using variable tube potential, tube current and ASIR settings. The assessed image quality indices were the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the noise power spectrum, low contrast detectability (LCD) and spatial resolution. A clinical retrospective study of 26 children (M:F = 14/12, mean age: 4 years, range: 1-9 years) was secondarily performed allowing comparison of 18 chest and 14 abdominal CT pairs, one with a routine CT dose and FBP reconstruction, and the other with 30 % lower dose and 40 % ASIR reconstruction. Two radiologists independently compared the images for overall image quality, noise, sharpness and artefacts, and measured image noise. RESULTS: The phantom study demonstrated a significant increase in SNR without impairment of the LCD or spatial resolution, except for tube current values below 30-50 mA. On clinical images, no significant difference was observed between FBP and reduced dose ASIR images. CONCLUSION: Iterative reconstruction allows at least 30 % dose reduction in paediatric chest and abdominal CT, without impairment of image quality. KEY POINTS: • Iterative reconstruction helps lower radiation exposure levels in children undergoing CT. • Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) significantly increases SNR without impairing spatial resolution. • For abdomen and chest CT, ASIR allows at least a 30 % dose reduction.

Journal club: Renal masses detected at abdominal CT: radiologists' adherence to guidelines regarding management recommendations and communication of critical results.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess radiologists' adherence to published guidelines for managing renal masses detected at abdominal CT at one institution and to a critical results communication policy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A validated natural language processing tool supplemented by manual review was used to randomly assemble a cohort of 97 radiology reports from all abdominal CT reports (n = 11,952) generated from July 2010 to June 2011. Critical renal mass findings warranted consideration for surgery, intervention, or imaging follow-up and required direct, separate, and timely communication to the referrer in addition to the radiology report. Primary outcomes were adherence to guidelines and institutional policy for communicating critical results. Sample size allowed a 95% CI ± 5% for primary outcome. Pearson chi-square test was performed to assess whether radiology subspecialization was predictive of the primary outcome. RESULTS: Of all abdominal CT reports, 35.6% contained at least one renal mass finding (4.3% critical). Guideline adherence was lower for patients with critical than for those with noncritical findings (48/57 [84.2%] vs 40/40 [100%]; p = 0.01). Adherence to critical result communication policy was 73.7% (42/57). For critical findings, abdominal radiologists had higher guideline adherence (40/43 [93.0%] vs 8/14 [57.1%]; p = 0.001) and critical result communication policy adherence (36/43 [83.7%] vs 6/14 [42.9%]; p = 0.002) than nonabdominal radiologists. CONCLUSION: In reporting renal masses detected at abdominal CT, radiologists largely adhered to management guidelines but did not adhere to the critical results communication policy in one of four reports. Subspecialization improved adherence to both management guidelines and the institution's critical result communication policy.

Best practice: implementation and use of abdominal dual-energy CT in routine patient care.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this perspective is to document an experience with the adoption of dual-energy CT (DECT) for routine clinical imaging. CONCLUSION: Successful implementation of DECT requires that technologists understand standards of image quality, be empowered to select appropriate patients, and understand networks for image routing. Radiologists need minimal facility with workstations to access the information embedded in DECT. DECT can be performed at a reduced effective radiation dose compared with single-energy CT and with lower doses of IV contrast material.

Should registrars be reporting after-hours CT scans? A calculation of error rate and the influencing factors in South Africa.

BACKGROUND: There is a heavy reliance on registrars for after-hours CT reporting with a resultant unavoidable error rate. PURPOSE: To determine the after-hours CT reporting error rate by radiology registrars and influencing factors on this error rate. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 2-month prospective study was undertaken at two tertiary, level 1 trauma centers in Johannesburg, South Africa. Provisional CT reports issued by the registrar on call were reviewed by a qualified radiologist the following morning and information relating to the number, time and type of reporting errors made as well as the body region scanned, indication for the scan, year of training of the registrar, and workload during the call were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1477 CT scans were performed with an overall error rate of 17.1% and a major error rate of 7.7%. The error rate for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th year registrars was 19.4%, 15.1%, and 14.5%, respectively. A significant difference was found between the error rate in reporting trauma scans (15.8%) compared to non-trauma scans (19.2%) although the difference between emergency scans (16.9%) and elective scans (22.6%) was found to be not significant, a finding likely due to the low number of elective scans performed. Abdominopelvic scans elicited the highest number of errors (33.9%) compared to the other body regions such as head (16.5%) and cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spine (11.7%). Increasing workload resulted in a significant increase in error rate when analyzed with a generalized linear model. There was also a significant difference noted in the time of scan groups which we attributed to a workload effect. Missed findings were the most frequent errors seen (57.3%). CONCLUSION: We found an increasing error rate associated with increasing workload and marked increase in errors with the reporting of abdominopelvic scans. There was a decrease in the error rate when looking an increasing year of training although this there was only found to be significant difference between the 2nd and 3rd year registrars.

Simple weight-based contrast dosing for standardization of portal phase CT liver enhancement.

AIM: To investigate the use of a weight-based volume of contrast media to optimize portal enhancement in patients undergoing abdominal computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients were assessed to establish whether a relationship existed between their weight and the portal liver enhancement achieved. Three methods of estimating weight were evaluated to establish which was the most appropriate to use in clinical practice. One hundred patients were then examined using 100 ml contrast media and 100 further patients using a weight-based contrast volume as dictated by a look-up table. The enhancement achieved by each technique was assessed. RESULTS: A good correlation was shown between patient weight and contrast enhancement when a fixed volume of contrast media was used (r=-0.825, p<0.0001). Asking the patient was shown to be the most appropriate method for estimating their weight. The mean portal liver enhancement using the fixed dose and weight-adjusted dose were 110 HU (SD=25.1) and 108 HU (SD=11.9), respectively. Weight-adjusted dose brought 37% more patients into the "ideal" enhancement range of 100-125 HU. CONCLUSION: The use of a simple, practical, weight-based look-up table to decide contrast media volumes during portal phase liver CT can greatly reduce inter-patient variability compared to a fixed-volume technique.

Therapeutic strategies of meconium obstruction of the small bowel in very-low-birthweight neonates.

BACKGROUND: Meconium obstruction without cystic fibrosis in low-birthweight neonates is a distinct clinical entity. We aimed to determine what therapeutic strategies work best in very-low-birthweight neonates with meconium obstruction of the small bowel under varied clinical conditions caused by the associated diseases of prematurity. METHODS: Medical records of very-low-birthweight neonates with meconium obstruction of the small bowel treated from 1998 to 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Pre- and postnatal data, treatments, and clinical outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Nine patients with perinatal complications were identified. Mean gestational age and birthweight were 26.9 weeks and 863 g, respectively. Abdominal distension developed from 1 to 7 days of life. Five patients were initially treated with Gastrografin enema, three of whom had successful outcomes. Two hemodynamically unstable patients failed to respond to Gastrografin treatment; they ultimately died of sepsis. The remaining four without Gastrografin treatment underwent enterostomy to resolve the obstructions with good results. CONCLUSIONS: Gastrografin and surgical treatments should be appropriately selected based on the underlying pathologies of meconium obstruction of the small bowel. Therapeutic Gastrografin enema is effective, safe and repeatable; however, it is not recommended for hemodynamically unstable patients. Surgical intervention is reserved for those who develop rapid abdominal distension that risks perforation.