Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-Associated Compartment Syndrome: Review of a National Database.

INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-associated compartment syndrome (CS) is a rare complication seen in critically ill patients. The epidemiology and management of ECMO-associated CS in the upper extremity (UE) and lower extremity (LE) are poorly defined in the literature. We sought to determine the epidemiology and characterize treatment and outcomes of UE-CS compared to LE-CS in the setting of ECMO therapy. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing ECMO therapy were identified in the Nationwide Readmission Database (2015-2019) and followed up for 6 months. Patients were stratified based on UE-CS versus LE-CS. Primary outcomes were fasciotomy and amputation. All-cause mortality and length of stay were also collected. Risk-adjusted modeling was performed to determine patient- and hospital-level factors associated with differences in the management UE-CS versus LE-CS while controlling for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 24,047 cases of ECMO during hospitalization were identified of which 598 were complicated by CS. Of this population, 507 cases were in the LE (84.8%), while 91 (15.5%) were in the UE. After multivariate analysis, UE-CS patients were less likely to undergo fasciotomy (50.5 vs. 70.9; P = 0.013) and were less likely to undergo amputation of the extremity (3.3 vs. 23.7; P = 0.001) although there was no difference in mortality (58.4 vs. 65.4; P = 0.330). CONCLUSIONS: ECMO patients with CS experience high mortality and morbidity. UE-CS has lower rates of fasciotomy and amputations, compared to LE-CS, with similar mortality. Further studies are needed to elucidate the reasons for these differences.

Acute Compartment Syndrome Following Thrombolysis For Acute Lower Limb Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Acute Compartment syndrome (ACS) with subsequent need for fasciotomy is a serious and insidious complication after revascularization for acute lower limb ischemia (ALI). The development of ACS during endovascular catheter directed thrombolysis is particularly difficult to identify. The aim was to identify the incidence, predisposing factors, wound treatment, and outcome in terms of amputation and survival for patients presenting with ALI that develop ACS during catheter directed thrombolysis. Patients who did not develop ACS after thrombolysis were analyzed as controls. METHODS: Descriptive retrospective analysis of prospective databases from two large tertiary-referral vascular centers. Patients with ACS after thrombolysis for ALI between 2001-2017 were analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy-eight cases and 621 controls were identified. Mean age was 72 years and 30 (38.5%) were women in the ACS group. Patients that developed ACS presented with significantly more severe preoperative ischemia. With 38.5% having Rutherford 2b classification as compared to 22.7 % in the control group (P = 0.002). Occluded popliteal artery aneurysms were also associated with a higher incidence of ACS (P = 0.041). Treatment of the fasciotomy wound was most commonly treated with regular wound dressing in 45 (58%) of cases, while wound dressing and foot pump and vacuum assisted closure were used in 14 (18%) and 19 (24%) respectively. These differing approaches did not affect the number of wound infections and amputations, which was similar regardless of treatment type. Vacuum assisted closure was associated with a higher degree of skin graft closure (P = 0.001). The median time to complete wound closure was 10 days. One year after thrombolysis, the major amputation rate in the ACS group was 31% as opposed to 17% in control group, P = 0.003. Mortality measured at 16.7% and 15.3%, respectively, P = 0.872. Amputation-free survival in the ACS group was 62% vs. 73% in the control group, P = 0.035. These differences level out, however, when applying long-term analysis of amputation-free survival in Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank 0.103). CONCLUSIONS: Patients that developed ACS during endovascular CDT presented with a more severe pre-operative ischemia, more occluded popliteal artery aneurysms and had a higher amputation rate during the first year, compared to controls. The development of ACS during endovascular treatment of ALI with thrombolysis is not uncommon and warrants both clinical awareness and rapid treatment.

Malpractice Litigation for Compartment Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze litigation involving compartment syndrome to identify the causes and outcomes of such malpractice suits. A better understanding of such litigation may provide insight into areas where clinicians may make improvements in the delivery of care. METHODS: Jury verdict reviews from the Westlaw database from January 1, 2010 to January 1, 2018 were reviewed. The search term "compartment syndrome" was used to identify cases and extract data on the specialty of the physician defendant, the demographics of the plaintiff, the allegation, and the verdict. RESULTS: A total of 124 individual cases involving the diagnosis of compartment syndrome were identified. Medical centers or the hospital was included as a defendant in 51.6% of cases. The most frequent physician defendants were orthopedic surgeons (45.96%) and emergency medicine physicians (20.16%), followed by cardiothoracic/vascular surgeons (16.93%). Failure to diagnose was the most frequently cited claim (71.8% of cases). Most plaintiffs were men, with a mean age of 36.7 years, suffering injuries for an average of 5 years before their verdict. Traumatic compartment syndrome of the lower extremity causing nerve damage was the most common complication attributed to failure to diagnose, leading to litigation. Forty cases (32.25%) were found for the plaintiff or settled, with an average award of $1,553,993.66. CONCLUSIONS: Our study offers a brief overview of the most common defendants, plaintiffs, and injuries involved in legal disputes involving compartment syndrome. Orthopedic surgeons were most commonly named; however, vascular surgeons may also be involved in these cases because of the large number of cases with associated arterial involvement. A significant percentage of cases were plaintiff verdicts or settled cases. Failure to diagnosis or delay in treatment was the most common causes of malpractice litigation. Compartment syndrome is a clinical diagnosis and requires a high level of suspicion for a timely diagnosis. Lack of objective criteria for diagnosis increases the chances of medical errors and makes it an area vulnerable to litigation.

Risk factors for death and amputation in acute leg compartment syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: The primary objective of this study is to determine whether time from injury to fasciotomy is associated with increased risk for death or limb amputation in patients with acute leg compartment syndrome. The secondary objective of this study is to identify other risk factors for death or limb amputation in patients with acute leg compartment syndrome. METHODS: In an institutional review board approved retrospective study, we identified 546 patients with acute compartment syndrome of 558 legs treated with fasciotomies from January 2000 to June 2015 at two Level I trauma centers. Our primary outcome measures were death and limb amputation during inpatient hospital admission. Electronic medical records were analyzed for patient-related factors and treatment-related factors. Bivariate analyses were used to screen for variables associated with our primary outcome measures, and explanatory variables with a p value below 0.05 were included in our multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: In-hospital death occurred in 6.6% and in-hospital limb amputation occurred in 9.5% of acute leg compartment syndrome patients. Neither death nor limb amputation was found to be associated with time from injury to fasciotomy. Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that older age (p = 0.03), higher modified Charlson Comorbidity Index (p = 0.009), higher potassium (p = 0.02), lower hemoglobin (p = 0.002), and higher lactate (p < 0.001) were associated with death, and diabetes mellitus (p = 0.05), no compartment pressure measurement (p = 0.009), higher PTT (p = 0.03), and lower albumin (p = 0.01) were associated with limb amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Time to fasciotomy is not found to be associated with death or limb amputation in acute leg compartment syndrome. Death and limb amputation are associated with patient-related factors and injury severity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Prognostic.

Current Approach to the Evaluation and Management of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome in Pediatric Patients.

Abdominal compartment syndrome is an emergent condition caused by increased pressure within the abdominal compartment. It can be caused by a number of etiologies, which are associated with decreased abdominal wall compliance, increased intraluminal or intraperitoneal contents, or edema from capillary leak or fluid resuscitation. The history and physical examination are of limited utility, and the criterion standard for diagnosis is intra-abdominal pressure measurement, which is typically performed via an intravesical catheter. Management includes increasing abdominal wall compliance, evacuating gastrointestinal or intraperitoneal contents, avoiding excessive fluid resuscitation, and decompressive laparotomy in select cases.

Acute compartment syndrome of the thigh in combat casualties.

Acute compartment syndrome of the thigh is a rare clinical entity often caused by high-energy trauma and presenting with a spectrum of associated injuries. Service members in combat are at risk for these causative mechanisms. This study presents a large cohort of thigh compartment syndrome combat casualties and investigates the injury mechanisms, associated mortality, and complications related to fasciotomies. Blasts were the most frequent injury mechanism, overall mortality was 23%, burns were associated with a higher mortality, and fasciotomy morbidity was reported by all respondents. The mortality was similar to civilian cohorts with thigh compartment syndrome and was isolated to patients with high Injury Severity Scores. While mortality associated with this injury is high, it is likely related to associated injury patterns rather than the compartment syndrome itself. Thigh compartment fasciotomies carried significant morbidity, consistent with civilian trauma publications.

Beneficial effects of theophylline infusions in surgical patients with intra-abdominal hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) can cause high mortality. Recently, we found that IAH was associated with increased serum levels of adenosine and interleukin 10. Our present "hypothesis-generated study" was based on the above mentioned results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this uncontrolled clinical trial, a total of 78 patients with IAH were enrolled representing a 13-20 mmHg range of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). Patients requiring surgical abdominal decompression were excluded. Patients were treated with the following protocols: standard supportive therapy (ST, n = 38) or ST plus infusion with the adenosine receptor antagonist theophylline (T, n = 40). Over the 5-day measurement period, IAP was monitored continuously and serum adenosine concentration and other clinical and laboratory measurements were monitored daily. Mortality was followed for the first 30 days following the diagnosis of IAH. RESULTS: Mortality of ST patients was 55%, which is compatible to other studies. Serum adenosine concentration was found to be directly proportional to IAP. Of the 40 patients receiving T treatment, survival was 100%. An increased survival related to theophylline infusion correlated with improving serum concentrations of IL-10, urea, and creatinine, as well as 24-h urine output, fluid balance, mean arterial pressure, and O(2)Sat. CONCLUSIONS: Adenosine receptor antagonism with T following IAH diagnosis resulted in markedly reduced mortality in patients with moderated IAH (<20 mmHg). Theophylline-associated mortality reduction may be related to improved renal perfusion and improved MAP, presumably caused by adenosine receptor blockade. Because this study was not a randomized controlled study, these compelling observations require further multicentric clinical confirmation.

Abdominal compartment syndrome in childhood: diagnostics, therapy and survival rate.

PURPOSE: The abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in childhood is a rare but dire disease if diagnosed delayed and treated improperly. The mortality amounts up to 60% (Beck et al. in Pediatr Crit Care Med 2:51-56, 2001). ACS is defined by a sustained rise of the intraabdominal pressure (IAP) together with newly developed organ dysfunction. The present study reports on 28 children with ACS to evaluate its potential role in the diagnosis, treatment and outcome of ACS. METHODS: Retrospectively, medical reports and outcome of 28 children were evaluated who underwent surgical treatment for ACS. The diagnosis of ACS was established by clinical signs, intravesical pressure-measurements and concurrent organ dysfunction. RESULTS: Primary ACS was found in 25 children (89.3%) predominantly resulting from polytrauma and peritonitis. Three children presented secondary ACS with sepsis (2 cases) and combustion (1 case) being the underlying causative diseases. Therapy of choice was the decompression of the abdominal cavity with implantation of an absorbable Vicryl(®) mesh. In 18 cases the abdominal cavity could be closed later, while in the other ten cases granulation of the mesh was allowed. The overall survival rate was 78.6% (22 of 28 children). The cause of death in the remaining six cases (21.4%) was sepsis with multiorgan failure. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that early establishment of the specific diagnosis of ACS followed by swift therapy with reduction of intraabdominal hypertension is essential in order to further reduce the high mortality rate associated with this condition.

Is the evolving management of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome improving survival?

OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis and management of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome have changed significantly over the past decade with improved understanding of the pathophysiology and appropriate treatment of these disease processes. Serial intra-abdominal pressure measurements, nonoperative pressure-reducing interventions, and early abdominal decompression for refractory intra-abdominal hypertension or abdominal compartment syndrome are all key elements of this evolving strategy. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Tertiary referral/level I trauma center. PATIENTS: Four hundred seventy-eight consecutive patients requiring an open abdomen for the management of intra-abdominal hypertension or abdominal compartment syndrome. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were managed by a defined group of surgical intensivists using established definitions and an evidence-based management algorithm. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify patient and management factors associated with improved survival. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Whereas patient demographics and severity of illness remained unchanged over the 6-yr study period, the use of a continually revised intra-abdominal hypertension/abdominal compartment syndrome management algorithm significantly increased patient survival to hospital discharge from 50% to 72% (p = .015). Clinically significant decreases in resource utilization and an increase in same-admission primary fascial closure from 59% to 81% were recognized. Development of abdominal compartment syndrome, prophylactic use of an open abdomen to prevent development of intra-abdominal hypertension/abdominal compartment syndrome, and use of a multi-modality surgical/medical management algorithm were identified as independent predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive evidence-based management strategy that includes early use of an open abdomen in patients at risk significantly improves survival from intra-abdominal hypertension/abdominal compartment syndrome. This improvement is not achieved at the cost of increased resource utilization and is associated with an increased rate of primary fascial closure.

Early results after treatment of open abdomen after aortic surgery with mesh traction and vacuum-assisted wound closure.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe the use of vacuum-assisted wound closure (VAWC) and mesh traction to repair an open abdomen after aortic surgery. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From October 2006 to April 2009, nine consecutive patients were treated; seven of the patients received laparostomy following abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS), while two wounds were left open initially. The indication for laparostomy was intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) > 20 mmHg or abdominal perfusion pressure (APP) < 60 mmHg and development of organ failure. V.A.C. therapy (KCI, San Antonio, TX, USA) was initiated with the laparostomy, and supplemented with a fascial mesh after 2 days. The wound was then closed stepwise with mesh traction and VAWC. RESULTS: All wounds could be closed following a median interval of 10.5 (range: 6-19) days after laparostomy. A median of four (range: 2-7) dressing changes were performed. One patient died on the seventh postoperative day. Two other patients died 38 and 50 days after final closure, respectively. Left colonic necrosis was seen in two patients while incisional hernia was observed in two patients. Mean follow-up duration was 17 (range: 2-36) months. CONCLUSION: VAWC with mesh traction was successful in terms of early delayed primary closure and is a useful tool in the treatment of open abdomen after aortic surgery.

The effects of abdominal compartment hypertension after open and endovascular repair of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed if emergency endovascular repair (eEVR) reduces the increase in intra-abdominal compartment pressure and host inflammatory response in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHODS: Thirty patients with ruptured AAA were prospectively recruited. Patients were offered eEVR or emergency conventional open repair (eOR) depending on anatomic suitability. Intra-abdominal pressure was measured postoperatively, at 2 and 6 hours, and then daily for 5 days. Organ dysfunction was assessed preoperatively by calculating the Hardman score. Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and lung injury scores were calculated regularly postoperatively. Hematologic analyses included serum urea and electrolytes, liver function indices, and C-reactive protein. Urine was analyzed for the albumin-creatinine ratio. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (12 men; mean age, 72.2 +/- 6.2 years) underwent eEVR, and 16 (14 men; mean age, 71.4 +/- 7.0 years) had eOR. Intra-abdominal pressure was significantly higher in the eOR cohort compared with the eEVR group. The eEVR patients had significantly less blood loss (P < .001) and transfused (P < .001) and total intraoperative intravenous fluid infusion (P = .001). The eOR group demonstrated a greater risk of organ dysfunction, with a higher systemic inflammatory response syndrome score at day 5 (P = .005) and higher lung injury scores at days 1 and 3 (P = .02 and P = .02) compared with eEVR. A significant correlation was observed between intra-abdominal pressure and the volume of blood lost and transfused, amount of fluid given, systemic inflammatory response syndrome score, multiple organ dysfunction score, lung injury score, and the length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that eEVR of ruptured AAA is less stressful and is associated with less intra-abdominal hypertension and host inflammatory response compared with eOR.

IAH/ACS: the rationale for surveillance.

Surveillance for intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) should be implemented in every intensive care unit (ICU), because it has been demonstrated that surveillance is effective. Several criteria that have led to the conclusion that IAH/ACS monitoring is of value: First, IAH is a frequent problem in critically ill patients that directly affects function of all organ systems to some degree, and that is associated with considerable mortality. Furthermore, simple tools for intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) monitoring are available, and it can be safely applied without the need for advanced tools. Finally, both ACS and IAH can be treated with either medical or surgical interventions. Treatment for IAH/ACS should be selected on the basis of the severity of symptoms and the cause of IAH. IAP monitoring should also be incorporated in the daily ICU management of the patient.

Intra-abdominal hypertension in acute pancreatitis.

The incidence of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) is approximately 60-80%. It is usually an early phenomenon, partly related to the effects of the inflammatory process, causing retroperitoneal edema, fluid collections, ascites, and ileus, and partly iatrogenic, resulting from aggressive fluid resuscitation. It also can manifest at a later stage, often associated with local pancreatic complications. IAH is associated with impaired organ dysfunction, especially of the cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal systems. Using current definitions, the incidence of the clinical manifestation, abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS), has been reported as 27% in the largest study so far. Despite several intervention options, the mortality in patients developing ACS remains high: 50-75%. Prevention with judicious use of crystalloids is important, and nonsurgical interventions, such as nasogastric decompression, short-term use of neuromuscular blockers, removal of fluid by extracorporeal techniques, and percutaneous drainage of ascites should be instituted early. The indications for surgical decompression are still not clearly defined, but undoubtedly some patients benefit from it. It can be achieved with full-thickness laparostomy (midline or transverse subcostal) or through a subcutaneous linea alba fasciotomy. Despite the improvement in physiological variables and significant decrease in IAP, the effects of surgical decompression on organ function and outcome are less clear. Because of the significant morbidity associated with surgical decompression and the management of the ensuing open abdomen, more research is needed to define better the appropriate indications and techniques for surgical intervention.

Abdominal compartment syndrome: A review.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this review were to summarize a) the consensus definitions of normal and pathologic intra-abdominal pressure (IAP); b) the techniques to measure IAP; c) the risk factors for intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS); d) the pathophysiology of ACS; and e) the current recommendations for management and prevention of ACS. DATA SOURCES: PubMed was searched using the following terms: ACS, IAH, IAP, and abdominal decompression. DATA SYNTHESIS: ACS represents the natural progression of end-organ dysfunction caused by increased IAP and develops if IAH is not recognized and treated appropriately. Although the reported incidence of ACS is relatively low in critically ill children (0.6%-4.7%) it may be under-recognized and under-reported. The diagnosis of IAH/ACS depends on a high index of suspicion and the accurate and frequent measurement of IAP in patients at risk. Mortality from ACS remains high (50%-60%) even when decompression of the abdomen is performed early, which highlights the importance of detection and treatment of elevated IAP before end-organ damage occurs. CONCLUSIONS: A widespread awareness of the recognition and current approach to management and prevention of IAH and ACS is needed among pediatric intensivists, so outcome of these life-threatening disease processes might be improved.

Component separation technique for abdominal wall reconstruction in burn patients with decompressive laparotomies.

BACKGROUND: Component separation technique has been used successfully in ventral hernia repair occurring after damage control surgery. Abdominal compartment syndrome, seen in severely injured burn patients, frequently requires decompressive laparotomy. The patient is at risk during this time not only for burn injury complications but also for those from an open abdomen. METHODS: This report presents the successful application of the component separation technique for early closure of decompressive laparotomies in patients with >75% total body surface area burn, which included the abdominal wall. RESULTS: Skin flaps (necrotic/burned skin) overlying the abdominal wall fascia were raised bilaterally at the costal margin, from the anterior superior iliac spine inferiorly to the ribs superiorly. An incision was made just lateral to the rectus sheath through the aponeurosis of the external oblique muscle. With this, the fascia was mobilized to the middle with no tension. With no elevation of the patient's intrathoracic pressure on closure of the abdomen, multiple no. 2 Ethibond fascial figure of eight sutures closed the abdomen. Skin flaps were excised, so that grafting of the abdominal wall could occur. CONCLUSION: Burn patients, who required decompressive laparotomies for abdominal compartment syndrome in response to massive fluid resuscitation, tolerated early closure by the modified component separation technique. This markedly improved the care of these critically burned individuals, allowing for less third space fluid loss, less difficulty in management of the open abdominal wound, along with decreased risk of potential enterocutaneous fistula and intraabdominal abscess formation.

Abdominal compartment syndrome among critically ill surgical and traumatised patients: experience at Pims, Islamabad.

BACKGROUND: Raised intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) accompanied by evidence of organ dysfunction constitutes abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). The ACS is now becoming an increasingly recognised fatal entity in the critically ill surgical and traumatized patients receiving critical care. The objectives were to determine the frequency of abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in critically ill surgical and traumatised patients and to identify the risk factors associated with its development in our patients. METHODS: This descriptive study was conducted at Department of Surgery, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Islamabad from July 2004 to February 2005. Two hundred critically ill adult surgical and traumatised patients who needed catheterisation were included in the study. Patients who had cardiac tamponade, tension pneumothorax, status asthmaticus, bladder outflow obstruction, pre-existing end organ failure and those not consenting to participate in the study were excluded. Diagnosis of the underlying surgical condition was made by history, physical examination and necessary investigations. The main diagnostic tool employed for detecting ACS was the measurement of intra-cystic pressure (ICP) which was taken as an indirect measure of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). It was measured four hourly by employing simple fluid column manometry method. Blood pressure, pulse rate, temperature, respiratory rate and urine output were recorded 4 hourly. Arterial blood gases (ABGs) and renal function tests (RFTs) were performed daily. ACS was diagnosed on the basis of raised IAP of >10 mmHg coupled with evidence of one or more end organ failure. A variety of risk factors that lead to ACS were studied among the patients. RESULTS: Out of 200 patients, six had ACS. The overall frequency was thus 3%. The M:F was 2:1. Most of the patients were in the age range of 31-40 years. Severe peritonitis, severe gut oedema, SIRS and tense ascites were recognised as statistically significant risk factors for the development of ACS. All patients with ACS had features of multiorgan dysfunction. There was 80% in-hospital mortality among the ACS sufferers. CONCLUSION: ACS develops in a significant number of critically ill and traumatised patients developing quickly and proving fatal without ACS specific interventions. All such high risk patients should undergo serial ICP measurements as a screening test for early detection of ACS.

Incidence and clinical effects of intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the epidemiology and outcomes of intra-abdominal hypertension in a heterogeneous intensive care unit population. DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort study. SETTING: This study was conducted at a medical-surgical intensive care unit in a university hospital. PATIENTS: Study patients included all those consecutively admitted during 9 months, staying > 24 hrs, and requiring bladder catheterization. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: On admission, epidemiologic data and risk factors for intra-abdominal hypertension were studied; then, daily maximal and mean intra-abdominal pressures (IAP(max) and IAP(mean)), abdominal perfusion pressure, fluid balances, filtration gradient, and sequential organ failure assessment score, were registered. IAPs were recorded through a bladder catheter every 6 hrs until death, discharge, or along 7 days. Intra-abdominal hypertension was defined as IAP > or = 12 mm Hg. Abdominal compartment syndrome was defined as IAP > or = 20 mm Hg plus > or = 1 new organ failure. Main outcome measure was hospital mortality. Of 83 patients, considering IAP(max), 31% had intra-abdominal hypertension on admission and another 33% developed it after (23% and 31% with IAP(mean)). Main risk factors were mechanical ventilation, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and fluid resuscitation (relative risk, 5.26, 3.19, and 2.50, respectively). Patients with intra-abdominal hypertension were sicker, had higher mortality (53% vs. 27%, p = .02), and consistently showed higher total and renal sequential organ failure assessment score, daily and cumulative fluid balances, and lower filtration gradient. Nonsurvivors had higher IAP(max), IAP(mean), and fluid balances and lower abdominal perfusion pressure. Abdominal compartment syndrome developed in 12%; 20% survived. Logistic regression identified IAP(max) as an independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.30; p = .003) after adjusting with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and comorbidities (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.25; p = .001; and odds ratio, 2.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-5.67; p = .013, respectively). Models with IAP(mean) and abdominal perfusion pressure also performed well. Areas under receiver operating characteristic curves were .81 and .83. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-abdominal hypertension, diagnosed either with IAP(max) or IAP(mean), was frequent and showed an independent association with mortality. Intra-abdominal hypertension was significantly associated with more severe organ failures, particularly renal and respiratory, and a prolonged intensive care unit stay.

Current insights in intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome: open the abdomen and keep it open!

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is associated with organ dysfunction and mortality in critically ill patients. Furthermore, the deleterious effects of increased IAP have been shown to occur at levels of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) previously deemed to be safe. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of all aspects of this underrecognized pathological syndrome for surgeons. METHODS AND CONTENTS: This review article will focus primarily on the recent literature on ACS as well as the definitions and recommendations published by the World Society for the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. The definitions regarding increased IAP will be listed, followed by a brief but comprehensive overview of the different mechanisms of organ dysfunction associated with intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH). Measurement techniques for IAP will be discussed, as well as recommendations for organ function support in patients with IAH. Finally, surgical treatment and management of the open abdomen are briefly discussed, as well as some minimally invasive techniques to decrease IAP. CONCLUSIONS: The ACS was first described in surgical patients with abdominal trauma, bleeding, or infection, but in recent years ACS has also been described in patients with other pathologies such as burn injury and sepsis. Some of these so-called nonsurgical patients will require surgery to treat their ACS. This review article is intended to provide surgeons with a clear insight into the current state of knowledge regarding IAH, ACS, and the impact of IAP on the critically ill patient.