Advances in Contact Lens Care Solutions: PVP-I Disinfectant and HAD Wetting Agents From Japan.

ABSTRACT: Half of the individuals who wear contact lenses use reusable lenses that require proper care. Improper contact lens (CL) care and using inadequate disinfecting solutions can lead to lens contamination, CL-related microbial keratitis, and Acanthamoeba keratitis. Oxidative disinfecting solutions, such as hydrogen peroxide, show higher efficacy than multipurpose solutions. Povidone-iodine (PVP-I), an oxidative disinfectant used in ophthalmic surgery, has been proven to be safe and effective. The PVP-I system, a CL disinfecting solution developed in Japan, has demonstrated excellent antimicrobial and antiviral properties. Although CL discomfort does not have a risk of ocular disorders with poor visual prognosis, such as keratitis, CL discomfort can still lead to lens dropout and thus needs to be addressed. To mitigate CL discomfort, it is essential to use disinfecting solutions containing surfactants and wetting agents that improve wettability of the lens surface. A CL solution containing hyaluronic acid derivatives (HADs) as wetting agents that permanently adhere to the lens surface to improve wettability of the lens surface was developed in Japan. There is potential for HAD to be integrated into various solutions. This article reviews the efficacy of novel PVP-I-based disinfecting solution and HAD wetting agents.

Activity of multipurpose contact lens solutions against Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens and Candida albicans biofilms.

INTRODUCTION: The use of contact lenses has progressively increased around the world, thereby increasing the risk of complications. The most serious complication is microbial keratitis (corneal infection) that can progress to a corneal ulcer. METHODS: Fourteen multipurpose contact lens solutions were tested on mature biofilms comprising Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens and Candida albicans, using the minimum disinfection times recommended by the manufacturers. The biofilm was induced in the lens case, and 24 h later, the solutions were added. Activity against planktonic and sessile cells was evaluated and quantified as colony forming units per millilitre. The minimum concentration for biofilm eradication was defined as a 99.9% reduction in viable cells. RESULTS: Although most solutions exhibited activity against planktonic cells, only five of the 14 solutions produced a significant reduction in the S. marcescens biofilm. No solution achieved the minimal biofilm eradication of S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and C. albicans. CONCLUSION: Multipurpose contact lens solutions provide greater bactericidal and/or fungicidal activity on planktonic cells than biofilms. The minimal eradication biofilm concentration was only achieved for S. marcescens.

Cell death of Acanthamoeba castellanii following exposure to antimicrobial agents commonly included in contact lens disinfecting solutions.

Several antimicrobial agents are commonly included in contact lens disinfectant solutions including chlorhexidine diacetate (CHX), polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) or myristamidopropyl dimethylamine (MAPD); however, their mode of action, i.e. necrosis versus apoptosis is incompletely understood. Here, we determined whether a mechanism of cell death resembling that of apoptosis was present in Acanthamoeba castellanii of the T4 genotype (NEFF) following exposure to the aforementioned antimicrobials using the anticoagulant annexin V that undergoes rapid high affinity binding to phosphatidylserine in the presence of calcium, making it a sensitive probe for phosphatidylserine exposure. The results revealed that under the conditions employed in this study, an apoptotic pathway of cell death in this organism at the tested conditions does not occur. Our findings suggest that necrosis is the likely mode of action; however, future mechanistic studies should be accomplished in additional experimental conditions to further comprehend the molecular mechanisms of cell death in Acanthamoeba.

Polyhexamethylene Biguanide Multipurpose Solutions on Bacterial Disinfection: A Comparison Study of Effectiveness in a Developing Country.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the antimicrobial action of commercially available multipurpose disinfection solutions (MPDS) with and without hydrogel contact lens for disinfection of isolated corneal bacteria. METHODS: Five commercially available MPDS in Brazil (BioSoak, Clear Lens, OPTI-FREE, Renu, and UltraSept) were tested against Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Staphylococcus aureus , and Staphylococcus epidermidis . All five MPDS were also tested on P. aeruginosa and S. aureus biofilm in a Hioxifilcon A lens. RESULTS: OPTI-FREE and Renu were effective against all bacterial isolates without contact lenses. BioSoak was effective in inhibiting P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidis but not against S. aureus . UltraSept was effective for inhibiting S. epidermidis and S. aureus but not against P. aeruginosa . Clear Lens was effective in inhibiting only S. epidermidis but not P. aeruginosa and S. aureus . In contact lens bacterial biofilms, OPTI-FREE was the only MPDS to demonstrate significantly higher disinfection. CONCLUSIONS: MPDS containing dual biocides polyquaternium-1 and myristamidopropyl dimethylamine possess the highest disinfection action against multiple ocular pathogens with and without contact lenses when compared with other MPDS. Current single-action polyhexamethylene biguanide solutions are not entirely effective and should not be recommended.

A novel montmorillonite clay-cetylpyridinium chloride complex as a potential antiamoebic composite material in contact lenses disinfection.

BACKGROUND: Acanthamoeba keratitis is a painful, sight-threatening infection. It is commonly associated with the use of contact lens. Several lines of evidence suggest inadequate contact lens solutions especially against the cyst forms of pathogenic Acanthamoeba, indicating the need to develop effective disinfectants. OBJECTIVE: In this work, the application and assessment of montmorillonite clay (Mt-clay), cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) and cetylpyridinium chloride-montmorillonite clay complex (CPC-Mt) against keratitis-causing A. castellanii belonging to the T4 genotype was studied. METHODS: Adhesion to human cells and amoeba-mediated cytopathogenicity assays were conducted to determine the impact of Mt-clay, CPC and CPC-Mt complex on amoeba-mediated binding and host cell death. Furthermore, assays were also performed to determine inhibitory effects of Mt-clay, CPC and CPC-Mt complex on encystment and excystment. In addition, the cytotoxicity of Mt-clay, CPC and CPC-Mt complex against human cells was examined. RESULTS: The results revealed that CPC and CPC-Mt complex presented significant antiamoebic effects against A. castellanii at microgram dose. Also, the CPC and CPC-Mt complex inhibited amoebae binding to host cells. Furthermore, CPC and CPC-Mt complex, were found to inhibit the encystment and excystment processes. Finally, CPC and CPC-Mt complex showed minimal host cell cytotoxicity. These results show that CPC and CPC-Mt complex exhibit potent anti-acanthamoebic properties. CONCLUSION: Given the ease of usage, safety, cost-effectiveness and long-term stability, CPC and CPC-Mt complex can prove to be an excellent choice in the rational development of contact-lens disinfectants to eradicate pathogenic Acanthamoeba effectively.

Multipurpose Lens Care Systems and Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens Wettability: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To provide a relationship between materials developed for silicone hydrogel contact lenses and multipurpose care solutions to identify improvements in wettability, for prelens noninvasive break-up time and subjective score. METHODS: This systematic review was completed according to the updated PRISMA 2020 statement recommendations and followed the explanation and elaboration guidelines. The PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus scientific literature databases were searched from January 2000 to November 2021. RESULTS: A total of four clinical trials published between 2011 and 2017 were included in this investigation. All included studies were randomized clinical trials. The success of contact lenses is related to the comfort of their use and therefore to the stability of the tear film and the wettability of its surface. The relationship between these parameters and changes in the ocular surface and inflammatory and infectious processes has been demonstrated. CONCLUSION: Hyaluronan and propylene glycol multipurpose solution (MPS) wetting agents achieved slightly higher prelens noninvasive break-up times than poloxamine. Polyquaternium-1 achieved better wettability and patient comfort than polyhexamethylene biguanide in medium-term studies. Short-term studies did not demonstrate differences between MPSs in their effect on contact lens wettability.

Effectiveness of Commonly Used Contact Lens Disinfectants Against SARS-CoV-2.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of commonly used contact lens disinfectants against severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). METHODS: The efficacy of five disinfectant solutions against SARS-CoV-2 was tested in the presence and absence of contact lenses (CLs). Three types of unused CLs (hard gas permeable, soft hydrogel, and soft silicone hydrogel) and worn silicone hydrogel CLs were tested. Contact lenses were infected with SARS-CoV-2 and disinfected at various times, with and without rubbing and rinsing, as per manufacturer's instructions. Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and viability polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were applied to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA and viral infectivity of SARS-CoV-2, respectively. RESULTS: In the presence of SARS-CoV-2-infected CLs, no SARS-CoV-2 RNA could be detected when disinfectant solutions were used according to the manufacturer's instructions. When SARS-Co-V2-infected CLs were disinfected without the rub-and-rinse step, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected at almost each time interval with each disinfecting solution tested for both new and worn CLs. In the absence of CLs, viable SARS-CoV-2 was detected with all disinfectant solutions except Menicon Progent at all time points. CONCLUSIONS: Disinfectant solutions effectively disinfect CLs from SARS-CoV-2 if manufacturer's instructions are followed. The rub-and-rinse regimen is mainly responsible for disinfection. The viability PCR may be useful to indicate potential infectiousness.

Antibacterial effects of octadecyl trimethylammonium micelle-clay complex against bacterial eye pathogens: potential as a contact lens disinfectant.

AIM: In this study, we utilized a micelle-clay complex composed of the surfactant octadecyltrimethylammonium bromide and montmorillonite clay and evaluated its antibacterial effects. METHODS: Using Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Micrococcus luteus, bactericidal assays were performed to determine the effects of ODTMA-clay complex on the viability of bacterial pathogen at various doses and different intervals of time. Cytotoxicity assays were performed to investigate ODTMA-clay complex effects on human cells, as determined by release of intracellular lactate dehydrogenase. RESULTS: The results revealed that ODTMA-clay complex abolished bacterial viability at 100 µg/mL within 45 min against P. aeruginosa, S. epidermidis, and M. luteus. Cytotoxicity assays revealed that ODTMA-clay complex exhibited minimal toxicity of the human cells. CONCLUSION: Rapid and potent antibacterial effects of ODTMA micelle-clay complex were observed in vitro; however, research is needed to determine precise formulation of contact lens disinfectants comprising ODTMA micelle-clay complex. Additionally, studies should be conducted using in vivo models of keratitis, progressing to pre-clinical and clinical trials. ODTMA micelle-clay complex is an ideal candidate to be incorporated in a novel contact lens disinfectant given the cost-effectiveness and ease of application and can be incorporated as an effective preventative strategy.

Development of anti-acanthamoebic approaches.

Acanthamoeba keratitis is a sight-endangering eye infection, and causative organism Acanthamoeba presents a significant concern to public health, given escalation of contact lens wearers. Contemporary therapy is burdensome, necessitating prompt diagnosis and aggressive treatment. None of the contact lens disinfectants (local and international) can eradicate Acanthamoeba effectively. Using a range of compounds targeting cellulose, ion channels, and biochemical pathways, we employed bioassay-guided testing to determine their anti-amoebic effects. The results indicated that acarbose, indaziflam, terbuthylazine, glimepiride, inositol, vildagliptin and repaglinide showed anti-amoebic effects. Compounds showed minimal toxicity on human cells. Therefore, effects of the evaluated compounds after conjugation with nanoparticles should certainly be the subject of future studies and will likely lead to promising leads for potential applications.

Differential Antimicrobial Efficacy of Multipurpose Solutions against Acanthamoeba Trophozoites.

SIGNIFICANCE: This investigation examines the effectiveness of several common contact lens solutions in the disinfection of Acanthamoeba, which causes a serious eye infection most often resulting from dysfunctional or improper use of contact lens products. PURPOSE: Acanthamoeba keratitis is an eye infection caused by a free-living amoeba, which can lead to extensive corneal damage and frequently blindness. Acanthamoeba keratitis is linked with contact lens use combined with noncompliance with contact lens care cleaning regimens. The patient's choice and use of multipurpose solutions (MPSs) continue to be a risk factor for Acanthamoeba keratitis. Thus, it is critical that the Acanthamoeba disinfection efficacy of the popular MPSs be determined. Here we compare the efficacy of seven major MPSs on the global market. METHODS: Using standard methods of Acanthamoeba disinfection and quantification, Acanthamoeba ATCC 30461, 30868, 50370, and 50676 trophozoites were inoculated into each MPS and held for the manufacturer's recommended disinfection time. Acanthamoeba recovery plates were incubated for 14 days, after which positive wells were identified and cell concentrations determined using the 50% endpoint method. RESULTS: Members of the OPTI-FREE products (Express, Replenish, and Puremoist [Alcon, Fort Worth, TX]) demonstrated significantly higher percentages of antimicrobial activity compared with the renu Advanced Formula (Bausch + Lomb, Rochester, NY), Biotrue (Bausch + Lomb), Acuvue RevitaLens (Johnson & Johnson, Santa Ana, CA), and Lite products (Cooper Vision, Scottsville, NY) for four of the trophozoite strains tested. CONCLUSIONS: Many of the popular MPS biocides maintain little or no antimicrobial activity against Acanthamoeba trophozoites, and the number of biocides in an MPS does not necessarily indicate its antimicrobial activity.

Effect of Hygiene Procedures on Lens Case Contamination with Povidone-Iodine or Multipurpose Disinfecting Solutions.

SIGNIFICANCE: A multipurpose disinfecting solution (MPDS), which contains povidone-iodine (PI) as a disinfectant, has high disinfecting efficacy not only on planktonic bacterium but also on the case biofilms. The addition of case hygiene practice removed more bacteria from cases than MPDS alone. PURPOSE: This study compared the ability of two MPDSs, one containing PI and another containing polyaminopropyl biguanide and polyquaternium, to reduce bacterial numbers in solution or adhered to the cases following case hygiene procedures. METHODS: Bacterial strains (Delftia acidovorans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Serratia marcescens, Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis) were exposed to the MPDSs for the recommended disinfection times, and the viable number evaluated according to ISO 14729. Cases were inoculated with bacterial strains and incubated for 24 hours to allow for biofilm formation. Cases were disinfected with both disinfecting solutions for 4 hours and rinsed, followed by recapping or air-drying, or tissue-wiping and air-drying for 18 hours. The number of survivors was counted using standard culture techniques. RESULTS: Both products exceeded the recommended 3-log reduction against planktonic bacteria. Regarding biofilm, after rinsing and recapping wet, the numbers of D. acidovorans (mean difference [95% confidence interval] log10 colony-forming units per case, -2.9 [0.8 to -4.6], P < .01), P. aeruginosa (-2.0 [0.5 to -3.1], P < .01), S. marcescens (-1.7 [0.8 to -3.5], P < .05), and S. epidermidis (-2.1 [0.6 to -3.5], P < .05) in PI cases were significantly lower than in the dual-disinfectant MPDS storage cases. After air-drying, the PI storage cases had significantly lower numbers of S. maltophilia (-2.6 [0.6 to -4.0], P < .01), D. acidovorans (-1.6 [0.7 to -3.3], P < .05), and S. aureus (-1.6 [0.7 to -3.1], P < .05). The addition of tissue-wiping reduced the bacterial numbers in the MPDS storage cases to levels in the PI storage cases. CONCLUSIONS: Contact lens users should be recommended to tissue-wipe and air-dry their lens storage cases after disinfection with regular MPDS.

Bacteriostatic Effect of Multidose Preservative-free Buffered Saline Used in Scleral Lens Wear.

SIGNIFICANCE: Scleral lenses have become an increasingly common treatment for ocular surface disease and irregular corneas. Multidose, preservative-free saline solutions are frequently used off-label to fill scleral lenses. Because the fluid resides over the ocular surface during lens wear, contaminated solutions may increase the risk of infectious complications. PURPOSE: We sought to assess the viability of skin microorganisms and pathogens associated with keratitis once introduced into a multidose preservative-free saline (MDPFS) solution containing the bacteriostatic agent boric acid (PuriLens Plus; The Lifestyle Co., Inc., Freehold, NJ). METHODS: Eleven bacterial and one yeast isolate were each inoculated to three lots of MDPFS as well as to sterile normal saline for comparison. Microorganism concentrations were enumerated at baseline and days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28. Persistence of microorganism viability was compared between MDPFS lots and between MDPFS and normal saline for each organism. RESULTS: Duration of microorganism viability was ≥24 hours in MDPFS with no significant difference in the distribution of survival duration of microorganisms in MDPFS versus normal saline (P = .15). Candida albicans concentrations declined 14 days earlier in MDPFS, whereas concentrations of viable organisms in MDPFS remained within 1 log of baseline for the longest durations for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (7 days), Escherichia coli (14 days), and Achromobacter xylosoxidans (≥28 days). Gram-positive organism concentrations remained within 1 log of baseline for no more than 3 days. Mild lot-to-lot variation in organism concentrations was noted near the end points of viability. Bacteriostasis was demonstrated in that concentrations of all organisms remained at or below baseline levels throughout the 28-day period. CONCLUSIONS: After microbial contamination, persistence of organism viability was similar in PuriLens and normal saline. Environmental gram-negative organisms, many of which can contribute to infectious keratitis, can persist for weeks once introduced into saline solutions.

To rub or not to rub? - effective rigid contact lens cleaning.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of cleaning of rigid contact lenses using two care solutions with and without rubbing. METHODS: A masked randomised trial was conducted. The cleaning efficacy of two solutions recommended for rigid contact lenses, a one-step hydrogen peroxide solution (HP) and a povidone iodine-based solution (PI), were evaluated on 64 unworn orthokeratology (ortho-k) lenses subsequent to cleaning with rubbing (R) with a surfactant cleaner or without rubbing (NR). Either mascara or hand cream was applied as a contaminant to the lenses to simulate stubborn and loosely bounded deposits, respectively. For each type of deposit, the lenses were randomly assigned to four cleaning treatments: R with HP, NR with HP, R with PI, and NR with PI (n = 8 for each group). Each lens surface was assessed on site by a masked examiner under a low-magnification slit-lamp and with photo-documentation. Lenses were graded according to the deposit coverage area using a pre-set five-point scale [0 (<20% coverage) - 4 (>80% coverage)]. RESULTS: For stubborn deposits (mascara), NR failed to remove deposits from 94% of lenses, whilst R removed more than 80% of deposits from 63% of the lenses. For oily deposits, 25% of NR lenses had >80% coverage, whilst only one R lens had 60-80% coverage, with 19% having 40-60% coverage, and 38% with either 20-40% or <20%. Rubbing improved lens cleanliness for both types of deposits, but only reached statistical significance for the stubborn deposit group. There were no significant differences between the solutions. CONCLUSION: Not Rubbing and using either HP or PI solutions, is not effective in removing stubborn deposits from ortho-k lenses. It is essential to rub lenses when cleaning rigid lenses to ensure optimal lens hygiene for ocular health, especially as rigid gas permeable (RGP) lenses are intended to be reused for at least a year before replacement. Rubbing with a daily cleaner should be included in the instructions for use of the solutions tested for rigid lenses and practitioners should be encouraged to emphasise the importance of rubbing in lens care.

The Antimicrobial Activity of Multipurpose Disinfecting Solutions in the Presence of Different Organic Soils.

OBJECTIVE: During use, contact lens disinfecting solutions are exposed to tears and clinical microbial isolates. The current study was designed to test the performance of several disinfecting solution in the presence of organic soils or clinical isolates. METHODS: Standard and clinical isolates were exposed to the disinfecting solutions in the presence or absence of different organic soils. The number of microbial cells killed during disinfection was established by growing cells after disinfection on agar plates. RESULTS: The disinfecting activity of the povidone-iodine or hydrogen peroxide solutions was not affected by the organic soils or clinical isolates. The presence of yeast organic soil did not affect the performance of the disinfecting solutions when tested with standard microbial strains, but the addition of a model tear organic soil significantly reduced the disinfecting activity of the solutions containing various combinations of polyhexamethylene biguanide, polyquaternium-1, alexidine, and myristamindopropyl dimethylamine especially when tested against the standard fungal strains (reducing the effectiveness by between 0.5-4 log10) or the clinical bacterial isolates (reducing the effectiveness by between 0.5-3.5 log10). One disinfecting solution that contained polyquaternium-1 and myristamindopropyl dimethylamine had very poor activity against the clinical bacterial isolates in the absence or presence of either organic soil. CONCLUSIONS: Povidone-iodine or hydrogen peroxide disinfecting solutions are not affected by organic soils and are very active against clinical bacterial isolates. Disinfecting solutions containing combinations of polyhexamethylene biguanide, polyquaternium-1, alexidine, and myristamindopropyl dimethylamine are affected by model tear organic soil and may have poor activity against clinical isolates.

Evaluation of prevention and disruption of biofilm in contact lens cases.

PURPOSE: The presence of biofilm in the lens case has been shown to be a risk factor for contamination of lenses and consequently microbial keratitis. This study aimed to evaluate effectiveness of solutions for rigid contact lenses in prevention and disruption of biofilm in lens cases and methods for biofilm detection. METHOD: This study adopted a stepwise approach to evaluate effectiveness of four rigid lens disinfecting solutions against biofilm. These included two polyhexamethylene bigiuanide (PHMB) solutions and a chlorhexidine/PHMB-based solution, as well as a novel povidone-iodine formulation. The presence of biofilm following exposure to the solutions was assessed using both crystal violet (CV) staining and MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) viability assay, taking into account the effect of lens case design. Three lens case designs, conventional flat, large bucket type, and cylindrical cases, were investigated for the ability to trap stain and allow biofilm formation. RESULTS: Considerable differences were noted between solutions in their ability to prevent and disrupt biofilm (p < 0.001). Lens case design greatly influenced optical density (OD) measurements even in negative controls, as cylindrical cases trapped more stain, increasing OD readings. Correcting for this factor reduced variations, but could not differentiate between residues and biofilm. MTT assay revealed that both povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine-containing solutions could effectively kill > 95% of organisms, whilst PHMB-based solutions were less effective with up to 55% of staphylococci and 41% of Pseudomonas surviving at 24 h. CONCLUSION: Biofilm can rapidly form in lens cases and may not be killed by disinfecting solutions. Of the solutions tested, none were able to prevent biofilm formation or disrupt established biofilm, but those containing chlorhexidine or povidone iodine were able to penetrate the biofilm and kill organisms. Assessment of biofilm by CV assay may be confounded by lens case design. Whilst CV assay can demonstrate presence of biofilm, this technique should be accompanied by viability assay to determine bactericidal activity.

Efficacy of Contact Lens Care Solutions in Removing Cholesterol Deposits From Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of multipurpose solutions (MPSs) on the removal of cholesterol deposits from silicone hydrogel (SH) contact lens materials using an in vitro model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five SH lens materials: senofilcon A, comfilcon A, balafilcon A, lotrafilcon A, and lotrafilcon B were removed from the blister pack (n=4 for each lens type), incubated for 7 days at 37°C in an artificial tear solution containing C radiolabeled cholesterol. Thereafter, lenses were stored in a preserved saline solution control (Sensitive Eyes Saline Plus) or cleaned with 1 of the 5 MPSs incorporating different preservatives (POLYQUAD/ALDOX, polyquaternium-1/alexidine, polyquaternium-1/PHMB, and 2 based on PHMB alone) using a rub and rinse technique, according to the manufacturer's recommendations, and stored in the MPS for a minimum of 6 hr. Lenses were then extracted with 2:1 chloroform:methanol, analyzed in a beta counter, and µg/lens of cholesterol was determined. RESULTS: Balafilcon A and senofilcon A lens materials showed the highest amounts of accumulated cholesterol (0.93±0.02 µg/lens; 0.95±0.01 µg/lens, respectively), whereas lotrafilcon A and lotrafilcon B deposited the lowest amounts (0.37±0.03 µg/lens; 0.47±0.12 µg/lens, respectively). For all lens materials, the MPS preserved with POLYQUAD/ALDOX removed more deposited cholesterol than any other test solution; however, the amount of removed cholesterol contamination from the individual contact lenses was only statistically significant for balafilcon A and senofilcon A (P=0.006 and P=0.042, respectively). Sensitive eyes and the other evaluated MPSs showed no significant effect on cholesterol removal (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Cholesterol-removal efficacy varies depending on the combination of lens material and solution. Only 1 MPS showed a statistically significant reduction of cholesterol deposit for only 2 of the 5 tested lens materials.

The Case for Using Hydrogen Peroxide Contact Lens Care Solutions: A Review.

Despite their established disinfection and safety benefits, the use of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) lens care systems among today's wearers of reusable contact lenses remains low in comparison with multipurpose solution (MPS) use. Multipurpose solution systems, however, present several potential drawbacks that may impact patient outcomes, including the use of chemical preservatives for disinfection, biocompatibility issues, and challenges with respect to lens care compliance. Given their unique composition and mechanism of action, one-step H2O2 systems offer the opportunity to avoid many of the challenges associated with MPS use. This article reviews the evolution of H2O2 lens care systems and examines the current scientific and clinical evidence regarding the relative ease of use, lens and tissue compatibility, disinfection efficacy, and ocular surface safety of H2O2 systems. Evaluation of the available data indicates that in comparison with MPS, one-step H2O2 systems tend to promote more favorable compliance, efficacy, comfort, and ocular surface outcomes for a wide range of contact lens-wearing patients. Based on the current published evidence, the authors recommend that eye care practitioners consider making one-step H2O2 systems their first-line contact lens care recommendation for most wearers of reusable lenses.

Diversity of Ocular Surface Bacterial Microbiome Adherent to Worn Contact Lenses and Bacterial Communities Associated With Care Solution Use.

PURPOSE: This study assessed microbiome adherent to contact lenses and defined the bacterial communities associated with use of lens care solutions. METHODS: Among 84 lenses screened for adherent ocular surface bacterial microbiome using 16S rRNA molecular amplification, 63 (75%) generated bacterial-specific amplicons processed using the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine workflow. Data were stratified by solution use (peroxide vs. polyhexamethylene biguanide [PHMB]-preserved multipurpose solution [MPS]). Diversity of lens-adherent microbiome was characterized using Shannon diversity index and richness index. Data were analyzed using principal components analysis and Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: We identified 19 phyla and 167 genera of bacteria adherent to the lenses. Proteobacteria was the most abundant phyla, followed by Firmicutes and Actinobacteria. The most abundant bacterial genera (>1% abundance) were Ralstonia, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Halomonas, Corynebacterium, Staphylococcus, Acinetobacter, Shewanella, Rhodococcus, and Cobetia. Sixteen of 20 lenses (80%) negative for bacterial DNA were worn by participants using peroxide solutions while only 4 (20%) were MPS-treated lenses (P=0.004). Genera diversity of lens-adherent microbiome showed a significant increase in MPS-treated lenses compared with peroxide (P=0.038). Abundance of Corynebacterium, Haemophilus, and Streptococcus were increased 4.3-, 12.3-, and 2.7-fold, respectively, in the MPS group compared with peroxide (P=0.014, 0.006, 0.047, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Commensal, environmental, and pathogenic bacteria known to be present in the conjunctival microbiome can be detected on worn contact lenses. Although most contact lenses worn by asymptomatic wearers harbor bacterial DNA, compared with peroxide, lenses stored in a PHMB-preserved MPS have more quantifiable, abundant, and diverse bacterial communities adherent to them.

Biocidal Efficacy of a Hydrogen Peroxide Lens Care Solution Incorporating a Novel Wetting Agent.

PURPOSE: To compare the antimicrobial effects of CLEAR CARE, a 3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) solution formulated for simultaneous cleaning, daily protein removal, disinfection, and storage of soft (hydrophilic) hydrogel, silicone hydrogel, and gas-permeable contact lenses, and CLEAR CARE PLUS, consisting of the 3% H2O2 solution plus a novel wetting agent, polyoxyethylene-polyoxybutylene (EOBO-21). METHODS: Three lots each of the 2 solutions were incubated with 5 compendial microorganisms required by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 510(k) and International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14729 stand-alone procedures, 4 clinical isolates of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, and trophozoites and cysts of 2 Acanthamoeba strains that are associated with microbial keratitis. Microbial loads were evaluated after disinfection and neutralization. RESULTS: Both solutions exceeded the FDA/ISO stand-alone primary criteria against Gram-positive and Gram-negative compendial bacteria, yeast, and mold after only 1.5-hr disinfection/neutralization. At the recommended minimum disinfection time, bacteria were reduced by 4.4 to 5.1 logs, yeast by 4.4 to 4.9 logs, and mold by 2.9 to 3.5 logs with and without organic soil. In addition, both solutions eliminated or effectively reduced populations of clinically relevant ocular bacterial isolates (4.5-5.0 logs), Acanthamoeba trophozoites (3.4-4.2 logs), and cysts (1.5-2.1 logs). CONCLUSION: Both solutions eliminated or reduced populations of FDA/ISO compendial bacteria and fungi as well as clinically relevant microorganisms and Acanthamoeba trophozoites and cysts. The addition of EOBO-21 to the 3% H2O2 lens care solution had no impact on antimicrobial activity.

Chloroquine as a possible disinfection adjunct of disinfection solutions against Acanthamoeba.

Acanthamoeba keratitis is commonly encountered by contact lens wearers. Contact lens solution plays an important role in the safe use of contact lenses. The most popular products for disinfecting lenses are multipurpose disinfecting solutions (MPDS). However, almost all MPDS retailed in Korea are ineffective in killing Acanthamoeba. The objective of this study was to determine the possibility of using autophagy inhibitor chloroquine as a disinfecting agent to improve the amoebicidal activity of MPDS against Acanthamoeba, especially the cyst. Amoebicidal effects of eight different MPDSs combined with chloroquine (CQ), an autophagy inhibitor, and their cytotoxicities to human corneal epithelium cells were determined. Almost all MPDS showed strong amoebicidal effect on trophozoites after 8 h of exposure. However, they showed inadequate amoebicidal effect on cysts even after 24 h of exposure. MPDSs combined with 100 µM CQ increased their amoebicidal effects on immature cyst by inhibiting formation of mature cysts. Incubation with 100 µM CQ for 30 min did not have cytotoxicity to human corneal epithelial cells.