Imprinted ß-ketoenamine-linked covalent organic frameworks as dispersive sorbents for the fluorometric determination of timolol.

Timolol accompanied the formation of fluorescent ß-ketoenamine-linked covalent organic frameworks (COFs) via the Sc(Tof)3-catalyzed condensation of derivated carbaldehyde and hydrazide in a 1,4-dioxane/mesitylene porogen to construct timolol-imprinted COFs (TICOFs). With high imprinting factors, the synthesis-optimized TICOFs were characterized by fluorescence, UV-Vis spectrometry, X-ray diffraction, N2 adsorption/desorption analyses, scanning electron microscopy, and FTIR spectrometry. The TICOF fluorescence measured at 390 nm/510 nm is dynamically quenched by timolol and was thus utilized to quantify timolol in a linear range of 25-500 nM with a LOD of 8 nM. The TICOF recovered 99.4% of 0.5% timolol maleate in a commercial eye drop (RSD = 1.1%, n = 5). In addition, TICOF was used as a dispersive sorbent to recover 95% of 2.0 nM timolol from 20 mg of TICOF in 25 mL phosphate buffer. Dilution factors of 25 and 75 were the maximum tolerated proportions of the urine and serum matrix spiked with 2.0 nM timolol to reach recoveries of 92.4% and 90.3%, respectively.

Development of a novel ion-pairing UPLC method with cation-exchange solid-phase extraction for determination of free timolol in human plasma.

A novel UPLC-UV method was developed for analysis of timolol in human plasma using a simple, fast, and cost effective ion-exchange SPE procedure, followed by separation on a C18 UPLC column with a mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile, phosphate buffer, and sodium 1-octane sulfonate as an ion pairing agent. The method was fully validated according to US-FDA guidelines, and was found to be sufficiently accurate and precise for analysis of timolol in human plasma for clinical pharmacokinetic studies. The application of ion-exchange SPE cartridges for purification of timolol in plasma produced excellent percent recoveries and good sample clean-up, while the ion-pairing separation described here allowed quantitation of timolol without interference from endogenous sample components. The method lower limit of detection was 1.7 ng/mL and the lower limit of quantitation was 5.0 ng/mL, allowing for analysis of therapeutic concentrations of timolol in plasma.

Comparison of a non-preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (single dose unit) with a preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (multidose) in ocular hypertension and glaucomatous patients.

AIM: This comparative, open design, phase III study was to assess the non-inferiority of the non-preserved T-Gel 0.1% single dose unit (SDU) versus its preserved multidose (MD) reference. METHODS: 175 patients with bilateral POAG or OHT were randomised: 87 patients were to receive one drop daily of T-Gel 0.1% MD and 88 patients were to receive one drop daily of T-Gel 0.1% SDU, for a treatment period of 12 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) in the worse eye between the baseline and the last assessment. Subjective and objective ocular signs as well as adverse events were recorded for safety. Global tolerance was assessed by the investigator and by the patient. RESULTS: The mean percentage reduction from baseline IOP was 24% for both treatments groups, which was consistent with previous studies. The safety results were comparable in both treatment groups. Because of gel formulation, mild short lasting episodes of blurred vision occurred for about 20% of patients. The global tolerance assessment reported that both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The overall study results demonstrated that T-Gel 0.1% SDU is not inferior to T-Gel 0.1% MD.

Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Safety of the Preservative-free Fixed Combination of Tafluprost 0.0015% and Timolol 0.5% in Healthy Volunteers: A Phase I Comparison vs. the Corresponding Preservative-free Monotherapies.

PURPOSE: Plasma concentrations of tafluprost acid and timolol were compared after single (Day 1) and repeated (Day 8) instillations of once-daily tafluprost 0.0015%-timolol 0.5% preservative-free (PF) fixed-dose combination (FDC), once-daily PF tafluprost 0.0015%, and twice-daily PF timolol 0.5%. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen healthy volunteers were randomized to this double-masked, single-center, three-period cross-over study. A wash-out interval of at least 4 weeks separated each three 8-day dosing period. Blood samples were drawn on the first and last day of each dosing period, prior to the morning dose, as well as 5, 10, 15, 30, and 45 min, and 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, and 12 h post-dosing. Sample plasma concentrations of tafluprost acid and/or timolol were determined and maximum concentration (C max), area under the concentration-over-time curve from time zero to the last time point with a quantifiable measurement (AUC0-last), and time to maximum concentration were calculated. Intraocular pressure (IOP), adverse events, and ocular/systemic safety variables were also evaluated. RESULTS: Plasma concentrations of tafluprost acid were low, with similar levels measured subsequent to either single or repeated dosing of PF FDC and PF tafluprost. On both sampling days, concentrations peaked at 10 min after the dose, and were cleared from the blood circulation by 30 min; average C max ranged from 17 to 24 pg/mL, and AUC0-last from 3 to 5 pg*h/mL. Plasma concentrations of timolol were comparable after the first dose of PF FDC or PF timolol. Concentrations peaked at 15 min post-dose and diminished in a similar manner after 2 h; average C max was 800 pg/mL and AUC0-last 3900 pg*h/mL. As expected, PF timolol produced a higher Day 8 pre-dose timolol concentration than PF FDC (235 vs. 37 pg/mL; p < 0.001, respectively). The Day 8 post-dose changes in timolol concentrations were relative to this pre-dose difference. All study treatments were well tolerated and safe. PF FDC seemed to provide the best IOP reduction. CONCLUSIONS: PF FDC demonstrated good IOP-lowering efficacy and displayed similar pharmacokinetic characteristics to the monotherapy agents. Exposure to timolol was reduced via the halved dosing.

Application of substrate depletion assay for early prediction of nonlinear pharmacokinetics in drug discovery: assessment of nonlinearity of metoprolol, timolol, and propranolol.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the advantages of the substrate depletion assay for evaluating linearity of pharmacokinetics compared with the metabolite formation assay. For propranolol, metoprolol, and nisoldipine with multiple and/or sequential metabolisms, the Michaelis constant (Km) and maximum metabolic intrinsic clearance obtained from the depletion assay using rat and human liver microsomes showed a good correlation with relevant parameters with the formation assay. In vitro kinetics and in vivo pharmacokinetic profiles after oral administration of timolol, metoprolol, and propranolol, were investigated in rats using the depletion assay. The same rank order was found between nonlinearities based on dose-normalized areas under the plasma concentration curve (AUC/Dose) and Km values. Using the kinetic parameters of these compounds, AUC was predicted based on a physiological based pharmacokinetic model incorporated saturable metabolism. The AUCs predicted for propranolol and metoprolol had a good relationship with those observed in the in vivo studies, implying that the depletion assay could be useful for assessing linearity of pharmacokinetics.

A prospective self-controlled study of topical timolol 0.5% cream for large superficial infantile hemangiomas.

Timolol has recently been reported to be an effective and safe treatment for small and superficial infantile hemangiomas (IH). However, it is controversial to choose it as an alternative to oral propranolol for large superficial IH. In this study, we generated a new modified timolol agent as the base of an ointment. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of this new agent, we recruited 20 patients with large superficial IH. The average age was 4 months old. The average area of the IH was 28.8 cm(2) . The treatment was continued for 2-6 months. Three assessors were asked to judge the changes in both the treated and untreated parts separately by comparing photographs. After an average of 3.25 months of treatment, the average visual analog scale scores were 5.5 and 4.3 for those with and without the medication, respectively. The treated parts regressed significantly more than the untreated parts (P < 0.05). There were no side-effects observed during treatment. High performance liquid chromatography was used to detect the serum concentration of timolol, and no timolol was detected in any of the blood samples (<0.02 µg/mL). Our new modified timolol agent is proven to be an effective therapy option for IH. Prospective studies with high-precision serum timolol concentrations, with heart rate or blood pressure monitoring during treatment, are needed to evaluate potential systemic absorption when using timolol on large IH.

Beta-blocking effects of timolol at low plasma concentrations.

The concentration-effect relationship of 0.25 mg intravenous timolol with and without pretreatment with 100 mg quinidine was studied in six healthy young volunteers with a randomized, double-blind, crossover study design. Blockade of cardiac beta-adrenoceptors was assessed by determining the dose ratios (DR) of isoproterenol infusions required to increase heart rate by 25 beats/min before and after timolol infusion. The logarithm of timolol concentration in plasma was linearly related to the logarithm (DR-1) of isoproterenol infusion, with a mean Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.89 +/- 0.11 (+/- SD; n = 24) at timolol concentrations well below 1 ng/ml. The increases in cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and norepinephrine plasma levels caused by isoproterenol infusions were attenuated after timolol. Quinidine administration increased timolol plasma levels and cardiac beta-blocking effects by 10% to 40%. It was concluded that timolol at concentrations below 1 ng/ml in plasma competitively antagonizes cardiac and noncardiac effects of isoproterenol infusions. Timolol effects are augmented after quinidine administration. The beta-blockade occurring at low plasma levels can explain side effects and actions of ocularly applied timolol.

Pharmacokinetics and beta-blocking effects of timolol in poor and extensive metabolizers of debrisoquin.

We studied the pharmacokinetics and beta-blocking effects of a single, oral 20 mg dose of timolol in six poor metabolizers (PMs) and six extensive metabolizers (EMs) of debrisoquin. The plasma timolol concentration was significantly higher in PMs than in EMs. There was a fourfold difference in mean AUC (1590 +/- 1133 vs. 394 +/- 239 ng X hr/ml; P less than 0.01) and a twofold difference in mean t1/2 (7.5 +/- 3 vs. 3.7 +/- 1.7 hours; P less than 0.01), reflecting differences in oral clearance (13.1 +/- 7.8 vs. 48.5 +/- 23.2 L/hr; P less than 0.01). The degree of beta-blockade was greater in PMs than in EMs at 12 hours (30.9% vs. 18.2%; P less than 0.05) and at 24 hours (28.3% vs. 13.1%; P less than 0.05). In the group as a whole the metabolic ratio correlated positively with both kinetic data and beta-blockade, but some overlap was observed. Hence timolol metabolism appears to be subject to debrisoquin-type polymorphism, which results in interphenotypic variation in plasma concentration and beta-blocking effect.

Timolol kinetics in chronic renal insufficiency.

A single-dose kinetic study of oral timolol, 20 mg, was undertaken in 3 groups of volunteers with varying degrees of renal function--(1) 10 normal subjects (N); (2) 9 patients with moderate chronic renal insufficiency (MCRI; C cr, 20 to 50 ml/min); (3) 4 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD)--to assess the need for dosage modification as renal function diminishes. There were borderline statistical differences in absorption between groups. The mean peak concentration (C max) was 84.3 +/- 44.8 ng/ml at 0.8 +/- 0.4 hr for N and 87.1 +/- 22.8 ng/ml at 1.7 +/- 1.2 hr (p, NS) for MCRI. N and MCRI mean half-lives (5.2 +/- 2.6 hr and 4.0 +/- 1.2 hr) were not statistically different. Salivary levels correlated with plasma levels in 3 N and 1 MCRI patient. Group differences in blood pressure and pulse response to timolol seems to reflect differences present at baseline with percent change from baseline identical for the two groups except at 12 to 24 hr. Administration of timolol on an interdialysis day revealed similar kinetic and physiologic response in the normal and the MCRI group. During dialysis, timolol, 20 mg, induced significant hypotension and bradycardia.

Timolol-induced up-regulation of polymorphonuclear leukocyte beta 2-adrenergic receptors in the elderly.

Drug-induced up-regulation of beta-adrenergic receptors is impaired in the brains of aged rats but not in myocardia. To investigate age-related changes in receptor regulation in human beings, young (24 to 35 years of age) and elderly (62 to 78 years of age) healthy volunteers were treated with the beta-adrenergic receptor blocking agent timolol maleate (10 mg b.i.d.) for 8 days. Baseline densities of beta 2-adrenergic receptors on polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMNL) membranes and heart rates were the same in the two age groups. However, systolic blood pressures were higher in the elderly subjects. Administration of timolol produced similar plasma levels in the two groups. In response to timolol, the density of PMNL beta-adrenergic receptors increased at a similar rate and to the same extent (threefold) in both age groups. Likewise, hemodynamic changes were not related to age. These results suggest that up-regulation of peripheral beta 2-adrenergic receptors in human beings is not impaired with aging.

Plasma timolol levels and systolic time intervals.

The beta-blocking potency of timolol was compared with that of propranolol under steady-state conditions in eight healthy subjects. The effects on systolic time intervals in healthy subjects and patients (n = 6) with coronary artery disease were evaluated in relation to varying timolol dose schedules and plasma concentrations. The beta-blocking potency was assessed by the inhibition of exercise-induced tachycardia. Timolol was eight times as potent as propranolol. There was wide between-patient variation (2.6 to 13.8) in timolol plasma concentration, and correlation between dose and peak (r = 0.61, p < 0.01) or nadir (r = 0.5 p < 0.01). There was a relatively weak correlation between timolol plasma concentration and degree of beta-blockade (r = 0.45, p < 0.05) and a linear correlation with dose (r = 0.98, p < 0.001). In healthy subjects timolol and propranolol had variable effects on systolic time intervals but in patients with coronary artery disease equipotent doses prolonged the preejection period, isovolumetric contraction time, and the ratio of the preejection period over the left ventricular ejection time. In patients as well as in normal subjects, the data indicated considerable beta-blocking effects for both drugs at the end of a 12-hourly dosing schedule, suggesting that twice-daily timolol and propranolol may be clinically practical.

Hemodynamic effects of intravenous timolol in coronary artery disease.

The hemodynamic effects of intravenous timolol were evaluated in 20 patients with coronary artery disease during diagnostic cardiac catheterization. The threshold dose of 0.25 mg reduced heart rate and cardiac index by 15% (p less than 0.05), left ventricular work index by 21% (p less than 0.05), and left ventricular dp/dt by 16% (p less than 0.05) while increasing left ventricular end-diastolic pressure by 49% (p less than 0.01), mean pulmonary arterial pressure by 17% (p less than 0.01), and systemic vascular resistance by 16% (NS). Larger doses (0.5 mg and 1.0 mg) induced similar responses with a greater effect on systemic vascular resistance (+22%, p less than 0.01, and +31%, p less than 0.001). The mean arterial pressure and stroke volumes were not affected by timolol. Peak effects, occurring at about 10 min after drug injection, did not correlate with plasma levels. The overall hemodynamic effects of timolol were similar to those reported for equipotent doses of propranolol and could be accounted for by the beta-adrenoceptor blocking activity.

Low dose O-butyryl timolol improves the therapeutic index of timolol in the pigmented rabbit.

The degree of enhancement in the ocular absorption of timolol afforded by its O-butyryl prodrug and the possibility of reducing its systemic absorption through a proportional reduction in its instilled dose were investigated in the pigmented rabbit. A reversed phase HPLC procedure was used to assay for timolol and O-butyryl timolol in the aqueous humor and plasma over 120 min post-instillation of 25 microliter of drug solutions. We found that the ocular absorption of the O-butyryl prodrug of timolol from a 15 mM solution was 5.5 times greater than that of the parent drug while the systemic absorption was comparable. When a lower concentration of the prodrug (3.75 mM) was used the therapeutic index as assessed by the ratio of aqueous humor to plasma concentrations seemed to improve fifteenfold. Therefore, it is possible to significantly reduce the systemic absorption of timolol without reducing its ocular absorption by using a low dose of its O-butyryl prodrug.

A model to predict aqueous humor and plasma pharmacokinetics of ocularly applied drugs.

PURPOSE: To develop methods for constructing a pharmacokinetic model to predict the time course of aqueous humor and plasma drug concentrations after topical dosage in rabbits using the simulation program iThink (formerly STELLA; High Performance Systems, Lyme, NH). METHOD: The model was constructed in experimentally verifiable segments using previously published data on intravenous, nasal, and ocular dosage, and was used to describe the influence of prolonging precorneal retention and varying drug release rate on the ratio of drug absorbed locally to drug absorbed systemically in rabbits. RESULTS: The model developed is comprehensive; it includes precorneal kinetics, nasal absorption kinetics, and plasma kinetics. CONCLUSIONS: Such a model may be useful in designing drug delivery strategies to improve the safety of topical eye medications through minimization of systemic absorption and maximization of drug delivery to ocular tissues.

Improved ocular: systemic absorption ratio of timolol by viscous vehicle and phenylephrine.

Increasing the ocular absorption of timolol relative to its systemic absorption is important clinically because ophthalmic timolol may cause serious respiratory, cardiac, and central nervous system side effects. The authors evaluated the effects of phenylephrine coadministration and solution viscosity on the aqueous humor:plasma and iris ciliary body:plasma ratios of peak timolol concentrations after ocular application. Timolol eye drops (5 mg/ml, 25 microliters) were administered to the eyes of pigmented rabbits. Coadministered phenylephrine (0.8-8.2 mg/ml) decreased the systemic peak concentrations of timolol significantly. Since ocular absorption of timolol was not affected by phenylephrine, the ocular:systemic concentration ratios were improved four- to fivefold. Phenylephrine slows down the systemic absorption of timolol by constricting the conjunctival and nasal capillaries. The ratios of the aqueous humor:plasma and iris ciliary body:plasma peak concentration of timolol were improved three- to ninefold in the presence of sodium carboxymethylcellulose compared with nonviscous eye drops. The improved ocular penetration is probably due to the longer corneal contact, and the decreased rate of systemic absorption may be caused by the slower spreading of the solution on the nasal mucosa. Compared with timolol eye drops, the ratio of the eye:plasma peak timolol concentrations was improved tenfold by using viscous eye drops with phenylephrine. Systemic concentrations of ophthalmic timolol and possibly related side effects can be decreased when timolol is instilled in a viscous vehicle with a low phenylephrine concentration.

Improving the ocular to systemic ratio of topical timolol by varying the dosing time.

This study was performed to determine whether the ratio of ocular to systemic absorption of topically applied timolol in the pigmented rabbit can be maximized by varying the time of drop instillation. Twenty-five microliters of 0.65% timolol maleate solutions were instilled into the pigmented rabbit eye at 6 AM, 12 PM, 6 PM, or 12 AM. The time course of timolol concentration in plasma and various eye tissues (conjunctiva, sclera, corneal epithelium, corneal stroma, aqueous humor, iris-ciliary body, and lens) was monitored with the use of reversed phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Ocular timolol concentrations were approximately twice as high when the drug was administered at 12 PM than at 6 AM, 6 PM, or 12 AM, whereas timolol concentration in plasma was lowest when the drug was administered at 12 PM. It may, therefore, be possible to maximize the therapeutic index of topically applied timolol by administering the drug at 12 PM. Moreover, the possible influence of dosing time on the extent of ocular and systemic drug absorption must be considered when planning dosing schedules for topically applied ophthalmic drugs.

Pharmacokinetic basis for nonadditivity of intraocular pressure lowering in timolol combinations.

The authors determined whether the ocular absorption of topically applied timolol in the pigmented rabbit was affected significantly by coadministration with either pilocarpine or epinephrine in the same drop to explain the nonadditivity in intraocular pressure lowering (IOP) seen clinically. They instilled 25 microliters of 0.65% timolol maleate solution (equivalent to 0.5% timolol), both in the presence and absence of 2.6% pilocarpine nitrate or 1% epinephrine bitartrate, into pigmented rabbit eyes. The time course of timolol concentration in the conjunctiva, anterior sclera, corneal epithelium, corneal stroma, aqueous humor, iris-ciliary body, and lens was monitored for 360 min by using reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. The area under the timolol concentration-time curve in all but one of the anterior segment tissues was reduced by 20-50% (mean, 40%) when timolol was coadministered with pilocarpine and by 20-70% (mean, 42%) when timolol was coadministered with epinephrine. Such an effect was not a result of alterations in corneal permeability or aqueous humor turnover rate, nor was it related to the extent of systemic absorption caused by pilocarpine and epinephrine. Rather, the reduction in ocular timolol absorption may have been caused by the accelerated washout of timolol by tears stimulated by the coadministered drugs and, to a lesser extent, by the loss of timolol through binding to the increased amount of tear proteins induced by the coadministered drugs. Thus, the nonadditivity in IOP lowering from timolol-pilocarpine and timolol-epinephrine combinations is probably caused by changes in precorneal timolol clearance.

The effect of timolol maleate on the disruption of the blood-aqueous barrier in the rabbit eye.

A disruption of the blood-aqueous barrier in rabbit eyes was elicited by use of topical prostaglandin E2(PGE2), infrared irradiation of the iris, or by subcutaneous alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (alpha-MSH). The aqueous flare provoked was measured quantitatively with a photoelectric instrument. The effect of the (topical) beta-adrenergic antagonist timolol maleate on the breakdown of the blood-aqueous barrier was tested. Timolol applied topically in very large doses had no effect on exogenously administered PGE2. However, even in a very small concentration applied topically, timolol reduced the flare response to both infrared irradiation and alpha-MSH. These results support the theory that the effect of alpha-MSH and infrared irradiation on the blood-aqueous barrier is dependent on intact beta-adrenergic receptor sites.

Absorption of ocular timolol.

The absorption of timolol after topical administration to the eye was studied in 11 healthy volunteers and in 5 patients with bilateral open angle glaucoma. The volunteers received 2 drops of 0.5% timolol ophthalmic solution in each eye, equivalent to 0.8 mg of timolol maleate. Overflow was absorbed by paper tissue. The patients received the same dose twice daily for 2 weeks and were then investigated. In the paper tissue, 12 to 88% of the dose administered was recovered. Plasma concentrations were never above 5 ng/ml and not always detectable (detection limit 1 to 2 ng/ml). However, timolol was absorbed as the drug was found in the urine samples from all volunteers and glaucomatous patients.