Predictors of outcome in large vessel occlusion stroke patients with intravenous tirofiban treatment: a post hoc analysis of the RESCUE BT clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the factors influencing good outcomes in patients receiving only intravenous tirofiban with endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion stroke. METHODS: Post hoc exploratory analysis using the RESCUE BT trial identified consecutive patients who received intravenous tirofiban with endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion stroke in 55 comprehensive stroke centers from October 2018 to January 2022 in China. RESULTS: A total of 521 patients received intravenous tirofiban, 253 of whom achieved a good 90-day outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2). Younger age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.965, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.947-0.982; p < 0.001), lower serum glucose (aOR: 0.865, 95%CI: 0.807-0.928; p < 0.001), lower baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (aOR: 0.907, 95%CI: 0.869-0.947; p < 0.001), fewer total passes (aOR: 0.791, 95%CI: 0.665-0.939; p = 0.008), shorter punctures to recanalization time (aOR: 0.995, 95%CI:0.991-0.999; p = 0.017), and modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score 2b to 3 (aOR: 8.330, 95%CI: 2.705-25.653; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of good outcomes after intravenous tirofiban with endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion stroke. CONCLUSION: Younger age, lower serum glucose level, lower baseline NIHSS score, fewer total passes, shorter punctures to recanalization time, and mTICI scores of 2b to 3 were independent predictors of good outcomes after intravenous tirofiban with endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion stroke. CHINESE CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY IDENTIFIER: ChiCTR-IOR-17014167.

Intravenous antiplatelet therapy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention : A report from the INVEST-STEMI group.

The use of intravenous antiplatelet therapy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is not fully standardized. The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of periprocedural intravenous administration of cangrelor or tirofiban in a contemporary ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) population undergoing PPCI. This was a multicenter prospective cohort study including consecutive STEMI patients who received cangrelor or tirofiban during PPCI at seven Italian centers. The primary effectiveness measure was the angiographic evidence of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow < 3 after PPCI. The primary safety outcome was the in-hospital occurrence of BARC (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) 2-5 bleedings. The study included 627 patients (median age 63 years, 79% males): 312 received cangrelor, 315 tirofiban. The percentage of history of bleeding, pulmonary edema and cardiogenic shock at admission was comparable between groups. Patients receiving cangrelor had lower ischemia time compared to tirofiban. TIMI flow before PPCI and TIMI thrombus grade were comparable between groups. At propensity score-weighted regression analysis, the risk of TIMI flow < 3 was significantly lower in patients treated with cangrelor compared to tirofiban (adjusted OR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.30-0.53). The risk of BARC 2-5 bleeding was comparable between groups (adjusted OR:1.35; 95% CI: 0.92-1.98). These results were consistent across multiple prespecified subgroups, including subjects stratified for different total ischemia time, with no statistical interaction. In this real-world multicenter STEMI population, the use of cangrelor was associated with improved myocardial perfusion assessed by coronary angiography after PPCI without increasing clinically-relevant bleedings compared to tirofiban.

Analysis of rescue strategies for acute thrombosis during STA-MCA bypass surgery and the literature review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: STA-MCA bypass surgery is mainly used for Moyamoya disease, giant intracranial aneurysms, and resection of intracranial tumors requiring sacrifice of blood vessels. The intraoperative patency of the reconstructive vessels is critical to the efficacy of the procedure. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intra-arterially infused tirofiban for the treatment of acute thrombosis during STA-MCA bypass surgery and countermeasures for acute thrombosis. METHODS: This study involved 209 patients (272 hemispheres) who underwent STA-MCA surgery between November 2020 and December 2023. Intraoperative acute thrombosis occurred in eight patients (3.83%,8 hemispheres). We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and imaging data, surgical procedure, and follow-up outcomes of eight patients. We implemented the different thrombolytic methods to evaluate the optimal thrombosis management during the bypass surgery. After three months, we assessed neurological functions using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and conducted a literature review using PubMed. RESULTS: Eight patients (four male patients and four female patients) developed acute thrombosis during the bypass surgery. Of the eight patients, two underwent re-anastomosis after thrombus removal, three received local injections of tirofiban into the anastomosis or the branches of the superficial temporal artery, and three underwent superselective intra-arterial tirofiban infusion using a microcatheter. Thrombosis were resolved, and arteries were recanalized in all patients. The mRS score was 0 in all patients. No major ischemic or hemorrhagic complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Our treatment methods were efficacious in the management of acute thrombosis. Intra-arterial tirofiban administration seems to be a simple and effective treatment option for acute thrombosis during STA-MCA bypass surgery.

Effect of Intravenous Tirofiban vs Placebo Before Endovascular Thrombectomy on Functional Outcomes in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: The RESCUE BT Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Tirofiban is a highly selective nonpeptide antagonist of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor, which reversibly inhibits platelet aggregation. It remains uncertain whether intravenous tirofiban is effective to improve functional outcomes for patients with large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy. Objective: To assess the efficacy and adverse events of intravenous tirofiban before endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion. Design, Setting, and Participants: This investigator-initiated, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was implemented at 55 hospitals in China, enrolling 948 patients with stroke and proximal intracranial large vessel occlusion presenting within 24 hours of time last known well. Recruitment took place between October 10, 2018, and October 31, 2021, with final follow-up on January 15, 2022. Interventions: Participants received intravenous tirofiban (n = 463) or placebo (n = 485) prior to endovascular thrombectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was disability level at 90 days as measured by overall distribution of the modified Rankin Scale scores from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death). The primary safety outcome was the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hours. Results: Among 948 patients randomized (mean age, 67 years; 391 [41.2%] women), 948 (100%) completed the trial. The median (IQR) 90-day modified Rankin Scale score in the tirofiban group vs placebo group was 3 (1-4) vs 3 (1-4). The adjusted common odds ratio for a lower level of disability with tirofiban vs placebo was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.86-1.36). Incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 9.7% in the tirofiban group vs 6.4% in the placebo group (difference, 3.3% [95% CI, -0.2% to 6.8%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy, treatment with intravenous tirofiban, compared with placebo, before endovascular therapy resulted in no significant difference in disability severity at 90 days. The findings do not support use of intravenous tirofiban before endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR-IOR-17014167.

Cangrelor, Tirofiban, and Chewed or Standard Prasugrel Regimens in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Primary Results of the FABOLUS-FASTER Trial.

BACKGROUND: Standard administration of newer oral P2Y12 inhibitors, including prasugrel or ticagrelor, provides suboptimal early inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. We aimed to investigate the effects of cangrelor, tirofiban, and prasugrel, administered as chewed or integral loading dose, on IPA in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: The FABOLUS-FASTER trial (Facilitation Through Aggrastat or Cangrelor Bolus and Infusion Over Prasugrel: A Multicenter Randomized Open-Label Trial in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Referred for Primary Percutaneous Intervention) is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, randomized study. A total of 122 P2Y12-naive patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction were randomly allocated (1:1:1) to cangrelor (n=40), tirofiban (n=40) (both administered as bolus and 2-hour infusion followed by 60 mg of prasugrel), or 60-mg loading dose of prasugrel (n=42). The latter group underwent an immediate 1:1 subrandomization to chewed (n=21) or integral (n=21) tablets administration. The trial was powered to test 3 hypotheses (noninferiority of cangrelor compared with tirofiban using a noninferiority margin of 9%, superiority of both tirofiban and cangrelor compared with chewed prasugrel, and superiority of chewed prasugrel as compared with integral prasugrel, each with α=0.016 for the primary end point, which was 30-minute IPA at light transmittance aggregometry in response to 20 µmol/L adenosine diphosphate. RESULTS: At 30 minutes, cangrelor did not satisfy noninferiority compared with tirofiban, which yielded superior IPA over cangrelor (95.0±8.9 versus 34.1±22.5; P<0.001). Cangrelor or tirofiban were both superior to chewed prasugrel (IPA, 10.5±11.0; P<0.001 for both comparisons), which did not provide higher IPA over integral prasugrel (6.3±11.4; P=0.47), despite yielding higher prasugrel active metabolite concentration (ng/mL; 62.3±82.6 versus 17.1±43.5; P=0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Cangrelor provided inferior IPA compared with tirofiban; both treatments yielded greater IPA compared with chewed prasugrel, which led to higher active metabolite concentration but not greater IPA compared with integral prasugrel. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02978040; URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu; EudraCT 2017-001065-24.

Intravenous Tirofiban Infusion After Angioplasty and Stenting in Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis-Related Stroke.

Background and Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of intravenous infusion of tirofiban after emergent angioplasty with or without stenting in patients with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis-related large-vessel occlusion stroke. Methods: We performed a retrospective case series study of 98 patients who underwent thrombectomy followed by angioplasty with or without stenting to treat intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis-related large-vessel occlusion. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those who received continuous intravenous infusion of tirofiban for 12 hours after procedure (intravenous tirofiban group, n=30) and those who did not receive postprocedural intravenous tirofiban (control group, n=68). The following treatment outcomes in the 2 groups were compared: early reocclusion of treated arteries on computed tomography angiography, parenchymal hematoma, symptomatic hemorrhage, and 90-day functional outcome. Results: Early reocclusion occurred in 18 patients (18.4%). The rate of early reocclusion was significantly lower in the intravenous tirofiban group than in the control group (3.3% versus 25%, P<0.001). The rates of parenchymal hematoma, symptomatic hemorrhage, 90-day good outcome, and mortality were not significantly different between the 2 groups. In multivariate logistic analysis, the only independent predictor of early reocclusion was no use of intravenous tirofiban (odds ratio, 9.212 [95% CI, 1.155-73.495], P=0.036). A good outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) was significantly less frequent in patients with early reocclusion than in those without it (16.7% versus 72.5%, P<0.001). Conclusions: The use of intravenous tirofiban for 12 hours was associated with decreased risk of early reocclusion of treated arteries, with no increased risk of hemorrhage after emergent angioplasty, with or without stenting, in patients with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis-related large-vessel occlusion stroke. Early reocclusion was associated with a poor outcome in such cases.

NT-proBNP level before primary PCI and risk of poor myocardial reperfusion: Insight from the On-TIME II trial.

BACKGROUND: N-terminal fragment of the brain natriuretic peptide prohormone (NT-proBNP), a marker for neurohumoral activation, has been associated with adverse outcome in patients with myocardial infarction. NT-proBNP levels may reflect extensive ischemia and microvascular damage, therefore we investigated the potential association between baseline NT-proBNP level and ST-resolution (STR), a marker of myocardial reperfusion, after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). METHODS: we performed a post-hoc analysis of the On-TIME II trial (which randomized ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients to pre-hospital tirofiban administration vs placebo). Patients with measured NT-proBNP before angiography were included. Multivariate logistic-regression analyses was performed to investigate the association between baseline NTproBNP level and STR one hour after pPCI. RESULTS: Out of 984 STEMI patients, 918 (93.3%) had NT-proBNP values at baseline. Patients with STR <70% had higher NT-proBNP values compared to patients with complete STR (>70%) [Mean ±SD 375.2 ±1021.7 vs 1007.4 ±2842.3, Median (IQR) 111.7 (58.4-280.0) vs 168.0 (62.3-601.3), P <.001]. At multivariate logistic regression analysis, independent predictors associated with higher risk of poor myocardial reperfusion (STR <70%) were: NT-proBNP (OR 1.17, 95%CI 1.04-1.31, P = .009), diabetes mellitus (OR 1.87, 95%CI 1.14-3.07, P = .013), anterior infarct location (OR 2.74, 95% CI 2.00-3.77, P <.001), time to intervention (OR 1.06, 95%CI 1.01-1.11, P = .021), randomisation to placebo (OR 1.45, 95%CI 1.05-1.99, P = .022). CONCLUSIONS: In STEMI patients, higher baseline NT-proBNP level was independently associate with higher risk of poor myocardial reperfusion, supporting the potential use of NT-proBNP as an early marker for risk stratification of myocardial reperfusion after pPCI in STEMI patients.

Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Tirofiban in Combination With Dual-antiplatelet Therapy in Progressive Ischemic Stroke Patients.

ABSTRACT: This study assessed the efficacy and safety of tirofiban in combination with dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in progressive ischemic stroke. One hundred and four patients equally divided into a tirofiban group or DAPT group were enrolled from June 2018 to December 2019. Efficacy outcomes included National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score for 14 days, and modified Rankin scale (mRs) scores as excellent (mRs 0-1) or favorable (mRs 0-2) measured 90 days after stroke. At 14 days, the tirofiban group had a lower National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score compared with the DAPT group (F = 14.959, P = 0.000). The mRS scores of the 2 groups at 90 days after treatment were significantly different from those before treatment. At 90 days, excellent favorable functional outcome (mRS ≤ 2) was achieved in 33 of 52 (63.43%) patients in the tirofiban group compared with 25 of 52 (48.08%) patients in the DAPT group. The incidence of bleeding was 5.77% in the tirofiban group, compared with 0% in DAPT group. Intravenous (IV) tirofiban alone or combined with DAPT was shown to be safe and effectively improved clinical outcome in progressive ischemic stroke patients. IV tirofiban was shown to be superior to the DAPT regimen.

Association between tirofiban monotherapy and efficacy and safety in acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists such as tirofiban are beneficial for patients with acute coronary syndromes. However, it is still uncertain about the efficacy and safety of tirofiban in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). METHODS: In this prospective non-randomized study, 255 AIS patients were recruited from 4 comprehensive stroke centers in China between January, 2017 and May, 2018. Among them,169 patients were treated with aspirin plus clopidogrel and 86 patients were treated with tirofiban. The primary functional outcome was the distribution of the 90 days' modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The safety outcomes included the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) at discharge and mortality at 3 months. RESULTS: In the propensity score matched cohort, tirofiban alone was noninferior to the dual antiplatelet with regard to the primary outcome (adjusted common odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.46 to 2.04; P = 0.93). Mortality at 90 days was 10% in the dual antiplatelet group and 8% in the tirofiban group (adjusted odds ratio 0.75; 95% CI 0.08 to 7.40, p = 0.81). There was no difference of the ICH rate between two groups (adjusted odds ratio 0.44; 95% CI 0.13 to 1.48, p = 0.18). In the inverse probability of treatment weighting-propensity score-adjusted cohort, similar differences were found for functional and safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggested that tirofiban use appears to be safe as monotherapy in AIS treatment compared with common dual antiplatelet therapy, however, no improvement in functional outcomes was found. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese clinical trial registry, ChiCTR2000034443 , 05/07/2020. Retrospectively registered.

The safety and efficacy of low-dosage tirofiban for stent-assisted coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Stent-assisted coiling (SAC) of acutely ruptured aneurysms with antiplatelet therapy has been controversial. Tirofiban has been used for the treatment of thromboembolism of ruptured aneurysms with a stent. However, there are few comparative studies of a reasonable dosage for the prophylactic use of tirofiban. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of reducing the dosage of tirofiban for the ruptured aneurysms with SAC. Patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms in our institution from January 2014 to June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Three hundred and nine patients were treated using SAC within 72 h of onset. Patients were divided into either a standard group (211 patients, 10 µg/kg intravenous bolus within 3 min, maintained with 0.15 µg/kg/min) or a half-dose group (98 patients, 5 µg/kg intravenous bolus within 3 min, maintained with 0.075 µg/kg/min) according to the dose of tirofiban received intraoperatively. Medical records including clinical and radiological details were reviewed. No significant differences in demographic information or aneurysm characteristics existed between the two groups. Thromboembolic complications were found in 15 patients (4.9%), including 11 patients (5.2%) in the standard group and four patients (4.1%) in the half-dose group, without significant difference (P = 0.782). Intracranial hemorrhage was found in 13 patients (4.2%), and all occurred in the standard group, which was significantly different (6.2% vs 0%, P = 0.011). Of these 13 patients, four were left disabled and five died. Except for three patients who had intraoperative aneurysm rupture, the incidence of postoperative early rebleeding (10 patients) was significantly different between the two groups (4.7% vs 0%, P = 0.034). The rate of initial complete occlusion in the half-dose group was significantly higher than that in the standard group (55.1% vs 39.8%). The rate of a good outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) was not significantly different between the standard group and half-dose group (78.7% vs 87.8%, P > 0.05). Intravenous tirofiban for SAC of acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms is feasible and safe. The half-dose tirofiban treatment was associated with a decrease in the prevalence of intracranial hemorrhage but no increase in thromboembolic events compared with those in standard-dose tirofiban treatment.

Prospective study of the effect of sulfotanshinone sodium combined with tirofiban on vascular endothelial function and indicators of plaque stability in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the effect of sulfotanshinone sodium injection combined with tirofiban on vascular endothelial function and indicators of plaque stability in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: We designed a prospective study and enrolled 169 patients with ACS who were admitted to our hospital as subjects. Patients treated with sulfotanshinone sodium injection combined with tirofiban (n = 99) were allocated to the research group (RG), and the remaining patients treated with tirofiban alone were allocated to the control group (n = 70; CG). The two groups were compared in terms of treatment efficacy, adverse reactions, vascular endothelial function, changes in plaque stability indicator levels, prognosis, recurrence rate, and quality of life after the treatment. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Treatment response rate, SOD and ET-1 levels, and quality-of-life score were markedly lower in RG than in CG (all P < .05). The incidence of adverse reactions; levels of CD63p, CD62p and GP IIb/IIIa; changes in plaque stability indicator levels; and recurrence rate were markedly higher in RG than in CG (all P < .05). There was no significant difference in 3-year survival rate between the two groups (P > .05). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Compared with tirofiban alone, sulfotanshinone sodium injection combined with tirofiban had superior efficacy and safety in the treatment of ACS. It can effectively reduce recurrence rate and improve quality of life in ACS, making it a strong candidate for popular clinical application.

Acute Stenting and Concomitant Tirofiban Administration for the Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Related to Intracranial Artery Dissections: A Single Center Experience and Systematic Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial artery dissection is an uncommon cause of acute ischemic stroke. Although acute stenting of the dissected arterial segment is a therapeutic option, the associated antiplatelet regimen remains a matter of debate. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of acute intracranial stenting together with concomitant intravenous administration of tirofiban and to perform a systematic review of the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center, retrospective study of the clinical and radiological records of all patients treated at our center by intracranial stenting in the setting of acute ischemic stroke between January 2010 and December 2020. A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to the PRISMA-P guidelines for relevant publications from January 1976 to December 2020 on intracranial artery dissection treated by stent. RESULTS: Seven patients with intracranial artery dissections underwent acute stenting with concomitant tirofiban during the study period. Mid-term follow-up showed parent artery patency in 6/7 cases (85.7%). The modified Rankin Score was ≤ 0-2 at 3 months in 5/7 cases (71.4%). The literature review identified 22 patients with intracranial artery dissection treated with acute stenting in association with different antithrombotic therapies. Complete revascularization was obtained in 86.3% of cases with a modified Rankin Score of ≤ 0-2 in 68% of patients at 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Acute intracranial stenting together with intravenous tirofiban administration could be a therapeutic option in patients with intracranial artery dissection and a small ischemic core.

Late Stent Thrombosis After Drug-Coated Balloon Coronary Angioplasty for In-Stent Restenosis.

A 41-year-old woman with chest pain for 6 hours was admitted to our chest pain center, presenting with acute myocardial infarction. Coronary angiography showed acute total occlusion in the proximal left anterior descending artery due to late stent thrombosis. After thrombus aspiration and intracoronary administration of 0.5 mg tirofiban, repeated angiography showed that no obvious residual stenosis remained. The patient underwent drug-coated balloon angioplasty 69 days ago and was then administered dual antiplatelet treatment (aspirin and clopidogrel) uninterruptedly. Genetic testing found that both cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) (G681A) and glycoprotein Ia (GPIa) (C807T, G873A) were hybrid mutant types, demonstrating that the patient was possibly resistant to clopidogrel and aspirin simultaneously. Thus, clopidogrel was replaced by ticagrelor and no more cardiovascular adverse events occurred during the 2-year follow-up.

Intraarterial Versus Intravenous Tirofiban as an Adjunct to Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the treatment effect of intraarterial versus intravenous tirofiban during endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: This study retrospectively examined 503 patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion who received endovascular thrombectomy within 24 hours of stroke onset. Patients were divided into 3 groups: no tirofiban (n=354), intraarterial tirofiban (n=79), and intravenous tirofiban (n=70). The 3 groups were compared in terms of recanalization rate, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, in-hospital death rate, 3-month death, and 3-month outcomes measured by modified Rankin Scale score (good clinical outcome of 0-2, poor outcome of 5-6). The comparison was statistically assessed by propensity score matching, followed by Freidman rank-sum test and pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: The propensity score matching resulted in 92 matched triplets. Compared with the no-tirofiban group, the intravenous tirofiban group showed significantly increased recanalization (96.7% versus 64.1%, P<0.001), an increased rate of 3-month good outcome (69.5% versus 51.2%, P=0.034), and a lower rate of 3-month poor outcome (12.2% versus 41.4%, P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the tirofiban intravenous and no-tirofiban groups in terms of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (2.2% versus 0%, P=1.000). However, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was significantly increased in the intraarterial-tirofiban group compared with the no-tirofiban group (19.1% versus 0%, P<0.001), with an increased rate of in-hospital death (23.6% versus 0% P<0.001), and increased rate of 3-month death (26.8% versus 11.1%, P=0.021). The intraarterial-tirofiban and no-tirofiban group showed no significant difference in recanalization rate (66.3% versus 64.1%, P=1.000). CONCLUSIONS: As an adjunct to endovascular thrombectomy, intravenous tirofiban is associated with high recanalization rate and good outcome, whereas intraarterial tirofiban is associated with high hemorrhagic rate and death rate.

Tirofiban for acute ischemic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of tirofiban for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains controversial. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and related international clinical trials registries through March 31, 2019, using the terms "tirofiban" and "stroke". All apparently unconfounded randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies with two arms comparing treatment with and without tirofiban for AIS were included in this review. Primary outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), fatal ICH, mortality, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS 0-2) at 3 months. RESULTS: Seventeen studies including 2914 AIS patients were identified. Pooled results showed that tirofiban treatment in AIS did not increase the risk of sICH (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.71-1.28; p = 0.75) or mortality (OR, 0.80; 95% CI; 0.64-1.02; p = 0.07). However, fatal ICH increased significantly in the tirofiban treatment group (OR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.38-5.85; p = 0.005), and subgroup analysis showed that tirofiban via intra-arterial (IA) administration was associated with increased risk of fatal ICH (OR, 2.90; 95% CI, 1.12-7.55; p = 0.03), while intravenous (IV) administration was not (OR, 2.75; 95% CI, 0.92-8.20; p = 0.07). In addition, tirofiban showed no obvious improvement in functional outcome (mRS 0-2) (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.97-1.71; p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Tirofiban seems to be safe in systemic treatment and may represent a potential choice for management of AIS. However, intra-arterial administration requires further adequately controlled studies in order to develop an appropriate protocol, similar to that in cardiology.

Ticagrelor and tirofiban in pregnancy and delivery: beyond labels.

Pregnancy-associated acute myocardial infarction is a rare condition usually occurring during the third trimester of pregnancy, and associated with three-to-four-fold higher mortality compared with rates among non-pregnant women of the same age. As in non-pregnant women, in cases of ST elevation myocardial infarction, the most effective treatment is primary percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation. Unfortunately, management of these patients could be challenging because little is known about the optimal medical strategy; the potential teratogenic effects of the third generation thienopyridines are not fully established too. In fact current guidelines do not provide enough recommendations about tailoring dual antiplatelet therapy prescription according to ischemic profile of the pregnant patients. Moreover, the bleeding risk class of cesarean delivery/hysterectomy is not stated in current consensus documents. We report the second pregnancy-associated acute myocardial infarction case successfully treated with ticagrelor before and after primary percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stent implantation on left coronary artery, but also the first report on use of bridging antiplatelet therapy with tirofiban during temporary withdrawal of ticagrelor because of a C-section.

Life after abciximab; what's next for intracoronary thrombus?

A case is described in which the short-acting glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist tirofiban was used in combination with heparin, aspirin and prasugrel to successfully treat extensive intracoronary thrombus in a delayed presentation STEMI, illustrating the utility of this approach.

Effects of Oral Antiplatelet Agents and Tirofiban on Functional Outcomes of Patients with Non-Disabling Minor Acute Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Over half of patients with acute ischemic stroke present with minor neurologic deficits. We investigated the effects of oral antiplatelet agents vs. tirofiban, a highly selective GP IIb/IIIa antiplatelet drug, on functional outcomes of stroke patients with non-disabling neurologic deficits. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed data of 125 patients with minor stroke who had National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores of 5 or less within 6 hours of stroke symptom onset between January 2010 and June 2018. All patients were selected from the Department of Neurology at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University. There were 54 cases in each group after propensity score matching, in which patients received oral antiplatelet agents (n = 64) and tirofiban (n = 61). Safety outcomes were assessed by incident intracranial hemorrhage, systemic bleeding and death. Efficacy outcomes were assessed using the NIHSS score at 24 hrs, 7 days or at discharge, and clinical deterioration. The modified rankin scale (mRs) was assessed at 90 days. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage, systemic bleeding or death between groups (P>0.05). Although neurological function improved significantly in both groups, NIHSS scores were lower in the tirofiban group compared with those in the oral antiplatelet agents group at 24 hrs (1 versus 3, P = 0.000), 7 days or at discharge (0 versus 2, P = 0.000). The clinical deterioration rate was higher in the oral antiplatelet agents group than in the tirofiban group, but without significance (16.7% versus 5.6%, P = 0.126). Functional outcomes (mRs = 0) were more favorable in the tirofiban group than in the oral antiplatelet agents group (66.7% vs. 44.4%; adjusted odds ratio 3.32; 95% CI: 1.38-7.99; P = 0. 008). CONCLUSION: Intravenous tirofiban seems to be safe and effective with more favorable functional outcomes than oral antiplatelet agents, suggesting that tirofiban is a viable treatment choice for selected patients with non-disabling minor acute ischemic stroke.

Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Tirofiban for Acute Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis Related Occlusion with Residual Stenosis after Endovascular Treatment.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment strategy for residual stenosis in patients with acute intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis related occlusion (ICAS-O) after endovascular treatment (EVT) is unknown. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose tirofiban in patients with residual stenosis after EVT due to acute ICAS-O. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively enrolled consecutive patients with residual stenosis after EVT due to acute ICAS-O from March 2015 to May 2019. Patients were divided into EVT alone group or EVT plus tirofiban group. The primary endpoint was the favorable functional outcome (defined as modified Rankin scale score of 0-2) at 90 days. The secondary endpoints were the proportions of reocclusion of recanalized arteries within 72 hours after EVT, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), any ICH, and mortality at 90 days. Logistic regression for predictors of reocclusion and functional outcomes were performed. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients, 50 treated with tirofiban and 48 without tirofiban, were enrolled in this study. Compared with patients in EVT alone group, patients in EVT plus tirofiban group had higher favorable functional outcome rate, lower mortality, and a lower reocclusion rate (56.3% versus 30.4%; P = .014, 8.3% versus 28.3%; P = .016, and 10.4% versus 32.6%; P = .011, respectively). The rates of any ICH and sICH were similar between the 2 groups. The use of tirofiban was associated with the favorable functional outcome (odds ratio [OR], 3.417; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.149-10.163; P = .027) and lower reocclusion rate (OR, 0.145; 95% CI, 0.038-0.546; P = .004) on multivariate logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with residual stenosis after EVT due to acute ICAS-O, a low-dose of tirofiban is associated with favorable functional outcome and reduced incidence of reocclusion without increasing any ICH and sICH.

Low-Dose Tirofiban Treatment Improves Neurological Deterioration Outcome After Intravenous Thrombolysis.

Background and Purpose- Early use of antiplatelet drugs within 24 hours after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) has always been a confusing clinical problem. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of early low-dose tirofiban treatment in patients with early neurological deterioration (END) within the first 24 hours after IVT. Methods- This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 1764 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with IVT between January 2017 and September 2018. Patients with early neurological deterioration within the first 24 hours after IVT were treated with or without tirofiban. The safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, any ICH, severe systemic bleeding, and mortality. Efficacy outcomes included excellent (modified Rankin scale scores 0-1) and favorable (modified Rankin scale scores 0-2) 3-month functional outcomes. Results- Early neurological deterioration occurred in 278 (15.8%) patients. Of the 187 eligible patients, 121 (64.7%) were treated with tirofiban within the first 24 hours after IVT. Adjusted multivariate analysis showed that early tirofiban use was not associated with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.05; 95% CI, 0.088-11.02; P=1.000), ICH (aOR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.45-4.25; P=0.512), and mortality (aOR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.19-2.27; P=0.875) but was significantly associated with excellent (aOR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.16-3.94; P=0.027) and favorable (aOR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.48-3.99; P=0.011) functional outcomes. Subgroup analyses suggested that early tirofiban-use efficacy is time dependent, being more effective in patients receiving tirofiban treatment earlier. Conclusions- Low-dose tirofiban use in patients with early neurological deterioration within the first 24 hours after IVT did not increase the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, ICH, and mortality, it seems associated with neurological improvement at 3 months. Future randomized clinical trials will be needed to validate these results.