Utility of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring to Protect against Adjacent Nerve Injury in Musculoskeletal and Lymph Nodal Cryoablation.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the utility of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) as an effective method of passive thermoprotection against cryogenic injury to neural structures during musculoskeletal and lymph node cryoablation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients (16 men; mean age among men, 68.6 years [range, 45-90 years]; mean age among women, 62.6 years [range, 28-88 years]) underwent 33 cryoablations of musculoskeletal and lymph node lesions. Transcranial electrical motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) of target nerves were recorded throughout the ablations. Significant change was defined as waveform amplitude reduction greater than 30% (MEP) and 50% (SSEP). The primary outcomes of this study were immediate postprocedural neurologic deficits and frequency of significant MEP and SSEP amplitude reductions. RESULTS: Significant amplitude reductions were detected in 54.5% (18/33) of MEP tracings and 0% (0/33) of SSEP tracings. Following each occurrence of significant amplitude reductions, freeze cycles were promptly terminated. Intraprocedurally, 13 patients had full recovery of amplitudes to baseline, 11 of whom had additional freeze cycles completed. In 5 of 33 (15.2%) cryoablations, there were immediate postprocedural neurologic deficits (moderate adverse events). Unrecovered MEPs conferred a relative risk for neurologic sequela of 23.2 (95% CI, 3.22-167.21; P < .001) versus those with recovered MEPs. All 5 patients had complete neurologic recovery by 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: IONM (with MEP but not SSEP) is a reliable and safe method of passive thermoprotection of neurologic structures during cryoablation. It provides early detection of changes in nerve conduction, which when addressed quickly, may result in complete restoration of MEP signals within the procedure and minimize risk of cryogenic neural injury.

Incidence of phrenic nerve injury during pulmonary vein isolation using different cryoballoons: data from a large prospective ablation registry.

AIMS: Phrenic nerve injury (PNI) is the most common complication during cryoballoon ablation. Currently, two cryoballoon systems are available, yet the difference is unclear. We sought to compare the acute procedural efficacy and safety of the two cryoballoons. METHODS: This prospective observational study consisted of 2,555 consecutive atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using either conventional (Arctic Front Advance) (AFA-CB) or novel cryoballoons (POLARx) (POLARx-CB) at 19 centers between January 2022 and October 2023. RESULTS: Among 2,555 patients (68.8 ± 10.9 years, 1,740 men, paroxysmal AF[PAF] 1,670 patients), PVIs were performed by the AFA-CB and POLARx-CB in 1,358 and 1,197 patients, respectively. Touch-up ablation was required in 299(11.7%) patients. The touch-up rate was significantly lower for POLARx-CB than AFA-CB (9.5% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.002), especially for right inferior PVs (RIPVs). The touch-up rate was significantly lower for PAF than non-PAF (8.8% vs. 17.2%, P < 0.001) and was similar between the two cryoballoons in non-PAF patients. Right PNI occurred in 64(2.5%) patients and 22(0.9%) were symptomatic. It occurred during the right superior PV (RSPV) ablation in 39(1.5%) patients. The incidence was significantly higher for POLARx-CB than AFA-CB (3.8% vs. 1.3%, P < 0.001) as was the incidence of symptomatic PNI (1.7% vs. 0.1%, P < 0.001). The difference was significant during RSPV (2.5% vs. 0.7%, P < 0.001) but not RIPV ablation. The PNI recovered more quickly for the AFA-CB than POLARx-CB. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of right PNI and lower touch-up rate for the POLARx-CB than AFA-CB in the real-world clinical practice.

Value of high-output pace-mapping of the right phrenic nerve for enabling safe radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: insights from three-dimensional computed tomography segmentation.

AIMS: Right phrenic nerve (RPN) injury is a disabling but uncommon complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) radiofrequency ablation. Pace-mapping is widely used to infer RPN's course, for limiting the risk of palsy by avoiding ablation at capture sites. However, information is lacking regarding the distance between the endocardial sites of capture and the actual anatomic RPN location. We aimed at determining the distance between endocardial sites of capture and anatomic CT location of the RPN, depending on the capture threshold. METHODS AND RESULTS: In consecutive patients undergoing AF radiofrequency ablation, we defined the course of the RPN on the electroanatomical map with high-output pacing at up to 50 mA/2 ms, and assessed RPN capture threshold (RPN-t). The true anatomic course of the RPN was delineated and segmented using CT scan, then merged with the electroanatomical map. The distance between pacing sites and the RPN was assessed. In 45 patients, 1033 pacing sites were analysed. Distances from pacing sites to RPN ranged from 7.5 ± 3.0 mm (min 1) when RPN-t was ≤10 mA to 19.2 ± 6.5 mm (min 9.4) in cases of non-capture at 50 mA. A distance to the phrenic nerve > 10 mm was predicted by RPN-t with a ROC curve area of 0.846 [0.821-0.870] (P < 0.001), with Se = 80.8% and Sp = 77.5% if RPN-t > 20 mA, Se = 68.0% and Sp = 91.6% if RPN-t > 30 mA, and Se = 42.4% and Sp = 97.6% if non-capture at 50 mA. CONCLUSION: These data emphasize the utility of high-output pace-mapping of the RPN. Non-capture at 50 mA/2 ms demonstrated very high specificity for predicting a distance to the RPN > 10 mm, ensuring safe radiofrequency delivery.

Can phrenic nerve injury be anticipated by larger cryoballoons?

Recently, a novel size-adjustable cryoballoon has been introduced in clinical practice, which can be inflated to two different diameters (28 and 31 mm). The 31 mm cryoballoon is specifically designed to achieve better contact with remodeled pulmonary veins (PVs) that have wider ostia while avoiding deep cannulation, thereby potentially reducing the risk of phrenic nerve injury (PNI) associated with deep balloon cannulation. However, we encountered two cases of PNI during cryoballoon ablation using the novel system among our initial 25 consecutive case series. Herein, we present two cases that exhibited PNI during freezing of the right superior PV with a size-adjustable balloon. While larger balloons are expected to create a larger area of isolation, the safety of this novel balloon system needs to be evaluated in a large-scale clinical study.

Nerve Injury Following Regional Nerve Block: A Literature Review of Its Etiologies, Risk Factors, and Prevention.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Postoperative nerve injury after nerve block is complex and multifactorial. The mechanisms, etiologies, and risk factors are explored. This review article conducts a literature search and summarizes current evidence and best practices in prevention of nerve injury. RECENT FINDINGS: Emerging technology such as ultrasound, injection pressure monitors, and nerve stimulators for peripheral nerve block have been incorporated into regular practice to reduce the rate of nerve injury. Studies show avoidance of intrafascicular injection, limiting concentrations/volumes of local anesthetic, and appropriate patient selection are the most significant controllable factors in limiting the negative consequences of nerve block. Peripheral nerve injury is an uncommon occurrence after nerve block and is obscured by surgical manipulation, positioning, and underlying neural integrity. Underlying neural integrity is not always evident despite an adequate history and physical exam. Surgical stress, independently of nerve block, may exacerbate these neurologic disease processes and make diagnosing a postoperative nerve injury more challenging. Prevention of nerve injury by surgical teams, care with positioning, and avoidance of intrafascicular injection with nerve block are the most evidence-based practices.

Elbow Arthroscopy: Pearls to Avoid Nerve Injuries.

Elbow arthroscopy is a useful tool that can be applied in a variety of surgical indications. However, performing the procedure safely demands a thorough understanding of the proximity of neurovascular structures around the elbow. Although nerve injuries in elbow arthroscopy are rare, complications can further be avoided by adhering to a set of principles designed to protect the surrounding neurovascular structures. Before making portals, the surgeon should palpate and mark the ulnar nerve to confirm its location in the groove. Next, the joint should be insufflated with fluid to distend the joint capsule and increase the distance between instruments and the anterior neurovascular structures. Anterior portals ideally should be made proximal to the medial and lateral epicondyles, thereby increasing distance from the median and radial nerve, respectively. Once in the joint, it is critical to stay oriented by maintaining instruments and the articular surfaces in the same view. Special caution should be exercised when in proximity to the capsule in the posteromedial gutter to protect the ulnar nerve. Similarly, the anterior inferior capsule should be approached with caution, as its violation puts branches of the radial nerve, specifically the posterior interosseous nerve, at risk. Elbow arthroscopy can be safely performed with proper knowledge and application of anatomy around the elbow when making portals and understanding at-risk areas beyond the capsule when working within the joint.

Fibrin Glue Coating Limits Scar Tissue Formation around Peripheral Nerves.

Scar tissue formation presents a significant barrier to peripheral nerve recovery in clinical practice. While different experimental methods have been described, there is no clinically available gold standard for its prevention. This study aims to determine the potential of fibrin glue (FG) to limit scarring around peripheral nerves. Thirty rats were divided into three groups: glutaraldehyde-induced sciatic nerve injury treated with FG (GA + FG), sciatic nerve injury with no treatment (GA), and no sciatic nerve injury (Sham). Neural regeneration was assessed with weekly measurements of the visual static sciatic index as a parameter for sciatic nerve function across a 12-week period. After 12 weeks, qualitative and quantitative histological analysis of scar tissue formation was performed. Furthermore, histomorphometric analysis and wet muscle weight analysis were performed after the postoperative observation period. The GA + FG group showed a faster functional recovery (6 versus 9 weeks) compared to the GA group. The FG-treated group showed significantly lower perineural scar tissue formation and significantly higher fiber density, myelin thickness, axon thickness, and myelinated fiber thickness than the GA group. A significantly higher wet muscle weight ratio of the tibialis anterior muscle was found in the GA + FG group compared to the GA group. Our results suggest that applying FG to injured nerves is a promising scar tissue prevention strategy associated with improved regeneration both at the microscopic and at the functional level. Our results can serve as a platform for innovation in the field of perineural regeneration with immense clinical potential.

Risk of suprascapular nerve injury in open Trillat procedure: an anatomical study.

PURPOSE: The open Trillat Procedure described to treat recurrent shoulder instability, has a renewed interest with the advent of arthroscopy. The suprascapular nerve (SSN) is theoretically at risk during the drilling of the scapula near the spinoglenoid notch. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between the screw securing the coracoid transfer and the SSN during open Trillat Procedure and define a safe zone for the SSN. METHODS: In this anatomical study, an open Trillat Procedure was performed on ten shoulders specimens. The coracoid was fixed by a screw after partial osteotomy and antero-posterior drilling of the scapular neck. The SSN was dissected with identification of the screw. We measured the distances SSN-screw (distance 1) and SSN-glenoid rim (distance 2). In axial plane, we measured the angles between the glenoid plane and the screw (α angle) and between the glenoid plane and the SSN (ß angle). RESULTS: The mean distance SSN-screw was 8.8 mm +/-5.4 (0-15). Mean α angle was 11°+/-2.4 (8-15). Mean ß angle was 22°+/-6.7 (12-30). No macroscopic lesion of the SSN was recorded but in 20% (2 cases), the screw was in contact with the nerve. In both cases, the ß angle was measured at 12°. CONCLUSION: During the open Trillat Procedure, the SSN can be injured due to its anatomical location. Placement of the screw should be within 10° of the glenoid plane to minimize the risk of SSN injury and could require the use of a specific guide or arthroscopic-assisted surgery.

3D mapping of phrenic nerve course for radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation.

INTRODUCTION: Phrenic nerve (PN) injury is a rare but severe complication of radiofrequency (RF) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The objective of this study was to characterize the typical intracardiac course of the PN with a three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping system, to quantify the need for modification of the ablation trajectory to avoid delivering an ablation lesion on sites with PN capture, and to identify very circumscribed areas of common PNC on the routine ablation trajectory of a RF-PVI, allowing fast and effective PN screening for everyday usage. METHODS: We enrolled 137 consecutive patients (63 ± 9 years, 64% men) undergoing PVI. A detailed high output (20 mA) pace-mapping protocol was performed in the right (RA) and left atrium (LA) and adjacent vasculature. RESULTS: The right PN was most commonly captured in the superior vena cava at a lateral (50%) or posterolateral (23%) position before descending along the RA either straight (29%) or with a posterolateral bend (20%). In the LA, beginning deep within the right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV), the right PN is most frequently detectable anterolateral (31%), then descends to the lateral proximal RSPV (23%), and further towards the lateral antral region (15%) onto the medial LA wall (12%). To avoid delivering an ablation lesion on sites with PN capture, modification of ablation trajectory was necessary in 23% of cases, most commonly in the lateral RSPV antrum (81%). No PN injury occurred. CONCLUSION: PN mapping frequently reveals the close proximity of the PN to the ablation trajectory during PVI, particularly in the lateral RSPV antrum. Routine PN pacing should be considered during RF PVI procedures.

Internal rotation of the shoulder in the beach chair position may increase the risk of iatrogenic suprascapular nerve injury at the spinoglenoid notch during surgical treatment for shoulder instability.

PURPOSE: Suprascapular nerve (SN) at the spinoglenoid notch is a mobile structure which is vulnerable to iatrogenic injury from screw or guidewire penetration during shoulder surgery such as Latarjet procedure or SLAP/Bankart repairs. The primary objective is to identify the distance between posterior glenoid and SN in different shoulder abduction and rotation. The secondary objective is to identify the distance in standard lateral decubitus position. METHODS: Nineteen shoulders from 10 Thiel embalmed soft cadavers were used in this study. The dissection of posterior shoulder was done to identify the SN at spinoglenoid notch. The distance between the posterior glenoid rim and the SN was measured. In beach chair position, the SN distance from six combinations of shoulder position was obtained: adduction/90° internal rotation (ADIR), adduction/neutral rotation (ADN), adduction/90° external rotation (ADER), 45° abduction/90° internal rotation (ABIR), 45° abduction/neutral rotation (ABN), 45° abduction/90° external rotation (ABER). Subsequently, the suprascapular nerve distance was measured in standard lateral decubitus position with 10 lbs. longitudinal traction. RESULTS: In the beach chair position with the shoulder in adduction, the mean distances between the glenoid and the SN in ADIR, ADN and ADER were 15.0 ± 3.3, 19.3 ± 2.6 and 19.5 ± 3.1 mm, respectively. During shoulder abduction, the mean distances when the shoulder was in ABIR, ABN and ABER were 15.2 ± 3.4, 19.4 ± 3.0 and 19.3 ± 2.6 mm, respectively. The mean distance for the lateral decubitus position was 19.3 ± 2.4 mm. The distance between the glenoid and SN was significantly shorter when the shoulder was positioned in internal rotation than in neutral (p < 0.001) or external rotation (p < 0.001) when compared to the same shoulder abduction position. The lateral decubitus position had comparable SN distance with the shoulder position of abduction/neutral rotation in beach chair position. CONCLUSION: The SN was closest to posterior glenoid rim if the shoulder was in internal rotation. Therefore, shoulder internal rotation must be avoided during guidewire and cannulated screw placement in the Latarjet procedure and drill bit insertion during anchor placement in SLAP/Bankart repair.

The use of medial support screw was associated with axillary nerve injury after plate fixation of proximal humeral fracture using minimal invasive deltoid-splitting approach.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for axillary nerve injury after plate fixation of humeral fractures using minimal invasive deltoid-splitting approach. We hypothesized that the use of medial support screw (MSS) would be associated with the outcome of axillary nerve injury. METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated consecutive 32 patients who underwent surgical treatments for proximal or midshaft humeral fractures. Of them, we included 26 patients who were examined by electromyography/nerve conduction (EMG/NCV) study at 3-4 weeks postoperatively. We excluded 6 patients because two of them were not compliant to EMG/NCV and the remaining two died due to unrelated medical illness. Outcome assessments included pain, functional scores, range of motion, and radiographic results. RESULTS: There were 8 male and 18 female patients with mean age of 67 ± 15 years. Mean duration of follow-up period was 31 ± 11 months. The mean time to EMG/NCS after surgery was 3.5 ± 0.6 weeks. EMG/NCS examinations revealed incomplete axillary nerve injury in 8 patients (31%) without complete nerve injury. Active forward elevation at 3 months postoperatively was significantly lower in patients with axillary nerve injury than in those without it (99° ± 12 and 123° ± 37, respectively, p = 0.047), although final clinical outcomes were not different. At surgery, MSS was used in 17 patients (65%), and 8 of them were associated with nerve injury. The use of MSS was only correlated with the outcome of axillary nerve injury, because the axillary nerve injury developed only in MSS group (p = 0.047). The MMT grade 4 in abduction strength was more common in patients with axillary nerve injury than in those without (p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Axillary nerve injury was a concern after plate fixation of proximal humeral fracture using minimal invasive deltoid-splitting approach. The use of medial support screw to improve the stability could increase a risk of axillary nerve injury when used with this approach.

Impact of mpMRI targeted biopsy on intraoperative nerve-sparing (NeuroSAFE) during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of prostate biopsy technique (transrectal ultrasound (US)-prostate biopsy (PBx) versus multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) targeted prostate biopsy (MRI-PBx) on intraoperative nerve-sparing and the rate of secondary neurovascular-bundle resection (SNR) in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP). A real-time investigation with a frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) microscopically excluded or confirmed prostate cancer invasion of the nerve structures resulting in preservation of the neurovascular bundle or SNR. Additionally, we analyzed risk factors related to SNR, such as longer operation time and postoperative complications. METHODS: The total study cohort was stratified according to non-nerve-sparing versus nerve-sparing RARP. Patients with nerve-sparing approach were then stratified according to biopsy technique (PBx vs. MRI-PBx). Further, we compared PBx versus MRI-PBx according to SNR rate. RESULTS: We included a total of 470 consecutive patients, who underwent RARP for PCa at our institution between January 2016 and December 2019. Patients with a preoperative MRI-PBx had a 2.12-fold higher chance of successful nerve-sparing (without SNR) compared to patients with PBx (p < 0.01). Patients with preoperative MRI-PBx required 73% less intraoperative SNR compared to patients with PBx (p < 0.0001). Prior MRI-PBx is thus a predictor for successful nerve-sparing RARP approach. CONCLUSION: Preoperative MRI-PBx led to better oncological outcomes and less SNR. Young patients with good erectile function could benefit from a preoperative MRI-PBx before nerve-sparing RARP.

Compound motor action potentials in transient and persistent phrenic nerve injury - metanalysis.

BACKGROUND: The right phrenic nerve is vulnerable to injury (PNI) during cryoballoon ablation (CBA) isolation of the right pulmonary veins. The complication can be transient or persistent. The reported incidence of PNI fluctuates from 4.73% to 24.7% depending on changes over time, CBA generation, and selected protective methods. M e t h o d s: Through September 2019, a database search was performed on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database. In the selected articles, the references were also extensively searched. The study provides a comprehensive meta-analysis of the overall prevalence of PNI, assesses the transient to persistent PNI ratio, the outcome of using compound motor action potentials (CMAP), and estimated average time to nerve recovery. R e s u l t s: From 2008 to 2019, 10,341 records from 48 trials were included. Out of 783 PNI retrieved from the studies, 589 (5.7%) and 194 (1.9%) were persistent. CMAP caused a significant reduction in the risk of persistent PNI from 2.3% to 1.1% (p = 0.05; odds ratio [OR] 2.13) in all CBA groups. The mean time to PNI recovery extended beyond the hospital discharge was significantly shorter in CMAP group at three months on average versus non CMAP at six months (p = 0.012). CMAP (in contrast to non-CMAP procedures) detects PNI earlier from 4 to 16 sec (p <0.05; I2 = 74.53%) and 3 to 9o (p <0.05; I2 = 97.24%) earlier. C o n c l u s i o n s: Right PNI extending beyond hospitalization is a relatively rare complication. CMAP use causes a significant decrease in the risk of prolonged injury and shortens the time to recovery.

Overexpression of miR-378 Alleviates Chronic Sciatic Nerve Injury by Targeting EZH2.

In numerous studies, microRNAs (miRNAs) have been authenticated to play vital roles in the pathophysiology of neuropathic pain and other neurological diseases. In our study, we focused on evaluating miR-378 and its potential effects in neuropathic pain development, as well as the underlying molecular mechanisms. Primarily, a chronic sciatic nerve injury (CCI) rat model was established. Next, reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was employed to measure the expression levels of miR-378 and EZH2 mRNA; the EZH2 protein expression levels were detected by western blot. A luciferase activity assay monitored the interaction of miR-378 and EZH2. Mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia was also performed to quantitate the effects of overexpression of miR-378 or EZH2 on the CCI rats. We found that miR-378 was down-regulated in the CCI rats, and the overexpression of miR-378 produced significant relief in their pain management. EZH2 was the downstream gene of miR-378 and was negatively regulated by miR-378. The up-regulation of EZH2 reduced the inhibitory effects of miR-378 on the development of neuropathic pain in the CCI rats. miR-378 acts as an inhibitor in the progression of neuropathic pain via targeting EZH2; the miR-378/EZH2 axis may be a novel target for the diagnosis and therapy of neuropathic pain in clinical treatment.

Automated Nerve Monitoring in Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Evoked potential monitoring is believed to prevent neurologic injury in various surgical settings; however, its clinical effect has not been scrutinized. It was hypothesized that an automated nerve monitor can minimize intraoperative nerve injury and thereby improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: A prospective, blinded, parallel group, superiority design, single-center, randomized controlled study was conducted. Study participants were equally randomized into either the automated nerve-monitored or the blinded monitored groups. The primary outcome was intraoperative nerve injury burden as assessed by the cumulative duration of nerve alerts. Secondary outcomes were neurologic deficits and functional scores of the operative arm, and the quality of life index (Euro Quality of life-5 domain-5 level score) at postoperative weeks 2, 6, and 12. RESULTS: From September 2018 to July 2019, 213 patients were screened, of whom 200 were randomized. There was no statistically significant difference in the duration of nerve alerts between the automated nerve-monitored and control groups (median [25th, 75th interquartile range]: 1 [0, 18] and 5 [0, 26.5]; Hodges-Lehman difference [95% CI]: 0 [0 to 1] min; P = 0.526). There were no statistically significant differences in secondary outcomes between groups. However, in the ancillary analysis, there were reductions in neurologic deficits and improvements in quality of life index occurring in both groups over the course of the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Protection from nerve injury is a shared responsibility between surgeons and anesthesiologists. Although a progressive improvement of clinical outcomes were observed over the course of the study in both groups as a consequence of the real-time feedback provided by the automated nerve monitor, this trial did not demonstrate that automated nerve monitoring by itself changes important clinical outcomes compared with no monitoring.

Nerve-sparing in Gynecology.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate identification and dissection of the pelvic autonomic nerves in gynecologic surgery. DESIGN: Identification on the right and left pelvic pelvises, dissection and preservation of the inferior hypogastric plexus in deep endometriosis, and dissection and preservation of the pelvic autonomic nerves in radical hysterectomy. SETTING: Academic center. INTERVENTIONS: Robotic excision of the pelvic peritoneum, excision of deep endometriosis in the uterosacral ligaments, and radical hysterectomy. CONCLUSION: Pelvic autonomic nerves are easy to identify with the magnification provided with an endoscopic camera. They should be dissected and preserved whenever possible because of their important function.

Fertility- and Nerve-sparing Laparoscopic Eradication of Deep Endometriosis with Total Posterior Compartment Peritonectomy: The Kurashiki Method.

OBJECTIVE: To show technical highlights of a nerve-sparing laparoscopic eradication of deep endometriosis (DE) with posterior compartment peritonectomy. DESIGN: Demonstration of the technique with narrated video footage. SETTING: An urban general hospital. A systematic review and meta-analysis has suggested significant advantages of the nerve-sparing technique when considering the relative risk of persistent urinary retention in the treatment of DE [1]. In addition, a recent article has suggested that complete excision of DE with posterior compartment peritonectomy could be the surgical treatment of choice to decrease postoperative pain, improve fertility rate, and prevent future recurrence [2]. However, in DE, nerve-sparing procedures are even more challenging than oncologic radical procedures because the pathology resembles both ovarian/rectal cancer in terms of visceral involvement and advanced cervical cancer in terms of wide parametrial infiltration through the pelvic wall. INTERVENTIONS: The video highlights the anatomic and technical aspects of a fertility- and nerve-sparing surgery in DE with posterior compartment peritonectomy. After adhesiolysis and ovarian surgery, we developed retroperitoneal space at the level of promontory. The hypogastric nerve consists of the upper edge of the pelvic plexus, therefore the autonomic nerves were separated in a "nerve plane" by sharp interfascial dissection of the loose connective tissue layers both above (between the fascia propria of the rectum and the prehypogastric nerve fascia) and below (between the prehypogastric nerve fascia and the presacral fascia) the hypogastric nerve [3,4]. As a result of these dissections, the autonomic nerves in the pelvis were separated like a sheet with surrounding fascia. We then completely resected all DE lesions including peritoneal endometriosis while avoiding injury to the nerve plane. In a small number of our experiences, none of the patients (n = 51) required clean intermittent self-catheterization after this procedure. CONCLUSION: Fertility- and nerve-sparing laparoscopic eradication of DE with total posterior compartment peritonectomy is a feasible technique and may provide both curability of DE and functional preservation. Our nerve-sparing technique can reproducibly simplify this complex procedure.

Relocating the C5 nerve stump in C5 nerve grafting to prevent iatrogenic phrenic nerve injury.

BACKGROUND: Exploration and grafting of the brachial plexus remains the gold standard for post-ganglionic brachial plexus injuries that present within an acceptable time frame from injury. The most common nerves available for grafting include C5 and C6. During the surgical exposure of C5 and C6, the phrenic nerve is anatomically anterior to the cervical spinal nerves, making it vulnerable to injury while performing the dissection and nerve stump to graft coaptation. We describe a novel technique that protects the phrenic nerve from injury during supraclavicular brachial plexus exposure and grafting of C5 or upper trunk ruptures or neuromas in-continuity. METHODS: A 4-step technique is illustrated: (1) The normal anatomic relationships of the phrenic nerve anterior to C5 is displayed in the face of the traumatic scarring. (2) The C5 spinal nerve stump is then transposed from its anatomic position posterior to the phrenic nerve to an anterior position. (3) The C5 stump is then moved medially for retrograde neurolysis of C5 from its phrenic nerve contribution. The graft coaptation to C5 is performed in this medial position, which minimizes retraction of the phrenic nerve. (4) The normal anatomic relationship of the phrenic nerve and the C5 nerve graft is restored. RESULTS: We have been routinely relocating the C5 spinal nerve stump around the phrenic nerve for the past 10 years. We have experienced no adverse respiratory events. CONCLUSION: This technique facilitates surgical exposure and prevents iatrogenic injury on the phrenic nerve during nerve reconstruction.

Modified left subsuperior segmentectomy via 2-cm uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Independent subsuperior segmentectomy (S*) via uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has rarely been reported. We describe our modified technique of performing simplified left subsuperior segmentectomy for a lung nodule, via 2-cm uniportal VATS. The uniportal approach was different from the traditional approach made by blunt separation into the thorax without electrocautery. Our modified technique minimizes damage to the intercostal nerves and muscles. We also simplified the subsuperior segmentectomy procedure according to the findings of three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography angiography and bronchography. Combining these two techniques achieves a new more minimally invasive method for subsuperior segmentectomy.

A novel method for predicting superior gluteal nerve safe zones in the lateral approach to the hip.

INTRODUCTION: The superior gluteal nerve (SGN) is at risk for laceration during lateral approach total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy of the trochanter-to-iliac crest distance (TCD) and the nerve-to-trochanter distance (NTD) ratio in determining a reproducible safe zone around the SGN independent of height. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen hemipelvises were dissected and the SGNs were exposed. The distance (NTD) from greater trochanter (GT) to the most inferior branch of the SGN encountered in each of the three approaches (Bauer et al., 1979) was measured. A reference distance (TCD) was measured from the GT to the highest point on the iliac crest. The NTD was divided by the TCD to generate standardized ratios. Coefficient of variation CV = (SD/mean) × 100 was calculated for each distance and ratio to measure relative variability. RESULTS: The standardized ratios (and CV) were determined for the nerve branches in three different surgical approaches: Hardinge 0.464 (0.9%), Bauer 0.406 (1.7%), and Frndak 0.338 (4.1%). There was a strong correlation of the individual NTDs with the TCD: NTD for Hardinge (r = 0.996, p < .001), NTD for Bauer (r = 0.984, p < .001), and NTD for Frndak (r = 0.932, p < .001). CONCLUSION: By measuring the TCD preoperatively and using the respective standardized ratios, surgeons can accurately predict the NTD and how proximal to the GT each SGN branch can be expected to be encountered during lateral approach to the hip. This will allow surgeons to work with a more precise safe zone around the SGN and minimize the possibility for a nerve injury.