[Cooperation of geriatrics and trauma surgery in certified geriatric trauma centers : Insights into different care models and the implementation of requirements resulting from certification]. / Zusammenarbeit von Geriatrie und Unfallchirurgie in zertifizierten alterstraumatologischen Zentren : Einblicke in unterschiedliche Versorgungsmodelle und in die Umsetzung von Anforderungen, die sich aus der Zertifizierung ergeben.

BACKGROUND: In Germany, different models of orthogeriatric co-management have been implemented in certified geriatric trauma centers. So far, it is not clear how the different models are implemented and what influence the certification has on the structures and processes within the centers. The present study examined the extent of cooperation between surgery and geriatrics and if the quality of care had changed since the certification of the centers. METHODS: In this study 4 guided focus group interviews (FGI) were conducted in different teams of certified geriatric trauma centers in 3 federal states with 16 participants. To specify the content of the FGI, two additional interviews were conducted with system auditors. Both types of interview were analyzed by content analysis. RESULTS: The certification supported the implementation of structures and processes in the different orthogeriatric models; however, the quality of care and cooperation between surgery and geriatrics depends on the spatial proximity and the orthogeriatric care model in the geriatric trauma centers. Simultaneously, challenges in the area of geriatric syndromes and the recruitment of skilled staff became relevant. DISCUSSION: The results can help to reflect processes in the certified geriatric trauma centers and to treat geriatric syndromes more effectively. In the future, the challenge will be to establish geriatric care under the existing shortage of skilled staff.

Multidisciplinary, multisite trauma team training during COVID-19: lessons from the first virtual E-S.T.A.R.T.T. course.

Trauma care delivery is a complex team-based task that requires deliberate practice. The COVID-19 pandemic has not diminished the importance of excellent trauma team dynamics. However, the pandemic hampers our ability to gather safely and train together. A mitigating solution is the provision of high-fidelity simulation training in a virtual setting. The Simulated Trauma and Resuscitation Team Training (S.T.A.R.T.T.) course has provided multidisciplinary trauma team members with skills in crisis resource management (CRM) for nearly 10 years. It has promoted collaborative learning from coast to coast, as the course typically runs at our national surgical and trauma meetings. In response to COVID-19 challenges, the course content has been modified to virtually connect 2 centres in different provinces simultaneously. High participant satisfaction suggests that the new virtual E-S.T.A.R.T.T course is able to continue to help providers develop important CRM skills in a multidisciplinary setting while remaining compliant with COVID-19 safety precautions.

An alphanumeric classification of osteoporotic pelvic ring injuries.

INTRODUCTION: Classification and management of osteoporotic pelvic ring injuries (OPRI) continue to pose a considerable challenge to orthopaedic traumatologists. The currently used fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) classification of OPRI has recently been shown to have significant weaknesses. The aim of this study therefore was to propose a new, simple, yet comprehensive alphanumeric classification (ANC) of OPRI and to assess its intra- and interobserver reliability. Furthermore, its potential advantages over the FFP classification are discussed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred consecutive CT scans from patients with OPRI were evaluated by three orthopaedic traumatologists with varying levels of experience and one musculoskeletal radiologist. Intra- and interobserver reliability of the proposed classification system was assessed using weighted kappa (κ) statistics and percentage agreement. In addition, the Fleiss' kappa statistic was computed to assess interobserver agreement among all four raters. RESULTS: Overall intraobserver reliability of the proposed ANC was substantial [κ ranging from 0.71 to 0.80; percentage agreement: 70% (range, 67-76%)]. Overall interobserver reliability between pairs of raters was substantial as well [κ ranging from 0.61 to 0.68; percentage agreement: 58% (range, 53-61%)]. For ANC types, groups and subgroups, intra- and interobserver reliability were substantial to almost perfect. Interobserver agreement among all four raters was moderate to substantial, with Fleiss' kappa values of 0.48, 0.69, 0.71 and 0.52 for ANC overall, types, groups and subgroups, respectively. CONCLUSION: The proposed ANC of OPRI demonstrated overall reliability comparable to that of the FFP classification. The ANC, however, is simple, more comprehensive, and consistently relates to injury severity.

COVID-19 coronavirus: recommended personal protective equipment for the orthopaedic and trauma surgeon.

PURPOSE: With the COVID-19 crisis, recommendations for personal protective equipment (PPE) are necessary for protection in orthopaedics and traumatology. The primary purpose of this study is to review and present current evidence and recommendations for personal protective equipment and safety recommendations for orthopaedic surgeons and trauma surgeons. METHODS: A systematic review of the available literature was performed using the keyword terms "COVID-19", "Coronavirus", "surgeon", "health-care workers", "protection", "masks", "gloves", "gowns", "helmets", and "aerosol" in several combinations. The following databases were assessed: Pubmed, Cochrane Reviews, Google Scholar. Due to the paucity of available data, it was decided to present it in a narrative manner. In addition, participating doctors were asked to provide their guidelines for PPE in their countries (Austria, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Germany, UK) for consideration in the presented practice recommendations. RESULTS: World Health Organization guidance for respiratory aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) such as intubation in a COVID19 environment was clear and included the use of an FFP3 (filtering face piece level 3) mask and face protection. However, the recommendation for surgical AGPs, such as the use of high-speed power tools in the operating theatre, was not clear until the UK Public Health England (PHE) guidance of 27 March 2020. This guidance included FFP3 masks and face protection, which UK surgeons quickly adopted. The recommended PPE for orthopaedic surgeons, working in a COVID19 environment, should consist of level 4 surgical gowns, face shields or goggles, double gloves, FFP2-3 or N95-99 respirator masks. An alternative to the mask, face shield and goggles is a powered air-purifying respirator, particularly if the surgeons fail the mask fit test or are required to undertake a long procedure. However, there is a high cost and limited availabilty of these devices at present. Currently available surgical helmets and toga systems may not be the solution due to a permeable top for air intake. During the current COVID-19 crisis, it appeared that telemedicine can be considered as an electronic personal protective equipment by reducing the number of physical contacts and risk contamination. CONCLUSION: Orthopaedic and trauma surgery using power tools, pulsatile lavage and electrocautery are surgical aerosol-generating procedures and all body fluids contain virus particles. Raising awareness of these issues will help avoid occupational transmission of COVID-19 to the surgical team by aerosolization of blood or other body fluids and hence adequate PPE should be available and used during orthopaedic surgery. In addition, efforts have to be made to improve the current evidence in this regard. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Management of orthopaedic and traumatology patients during the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic in northern Italy.

PURPOSE: This article aims to share northern Italy's experience in hospital re-organization and management of clinical pathways for traumatic and orthopaedic patients in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Authors collected regional recommendations to re-organize the healthcare system during the initial weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic in March, 2020. The specific protocols implemented in an orthopaedic hospital, selected as a regional hub for minor trauma, are analyzed and described in this article. RESULTS: Two referral centres were identified as the hubs for minor trauma to reduce the risk of overload in general hospitals. These two centres have specific features: an emergency room, specialized orthopaedic surgeons for joint diseases and trauma surgeons on-call 24/7. Patients with trauma without the need for a multi-disciplinary approach or needing non-deferrable elective orthopaedic surgery were moved to these hospitals. Authors report the internal protocols of one of these centres. All elective surgery was stopped, outpatient clinics limited to emergencies and specific pathways, ward and operating theatre dedicated to COVID-19-positive patients were implemented. An oropharyngeal swab was performed in the emergency room for all patients needing to be admitted, and patients were moved to a specific ward with single rooms to wait for the results. Specific courses were organized to demonstrate the correct use of personal protection equipment (PPE). CONCLUSION: The structure of the orthopaedic hubs, and the internal protocols proposed, could help to improve the quality of assistance for patients with musculoskeletal disorders and reduce the risk of overload in general hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on orthopaedic and trauma surgery training in Europe.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on orthopaedic and trauma surgery training in Europe by conducting an online survey among orthopaedic trainees. METHODS: The survey was conducted among members of the Federation of Orthopaedic and Trauma Trainees in Europe (FORTE). It consisted of 24 questions (single-answer, multiple-answer, Likert scales). Orthopaedic trainees' demographic data (six questions), clinical role changes (four questions), institutional changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic (nine questions), and personal considerations (five questions) were examined. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty-seven trainees from 23 European countries completed the survey. Most trainees retained their customary clinical role (59.8%), but a significant number was redeployed to COVID-19 units (20.9%). A drastic workload decrease during the pandemic was reported at most institutions. Only essential activities were performed at 57.1% of institutions and drastic disruptions were reported at 36.0%. Of the respondents, 52.1% stated that faculty-led education was restricted and 46.3% pursued self-guided learning, while 58.6% stated that surgical training was significantly impaired. Concerns about the achievement of annual training goals were expressed by 58.2% of the participants, while 25.0% anticipated the need for an additional year of training. CONCLUSIONS: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic significantly affected orthopaedic and trauma training in Europe. Most trainees felt the decrease in clinical, surgical, and educational activities would have a detrimental effect on their training. Many of them consulted remote learning options to compensate training impairment, stating that after the COVID-19 pandemic electronic educational approaches may become more relevant in future.

The Hybrid Electronic Medical Registry Allows Benchmarking of Quality of Trauma Care: A Five-Year Temporal Overview of the Trauma Burden at a Major Trauma Centre in South Africa.

INTRODUCTION: This study is a five-year follow-up of previously published review of the trauma workload at our institution. It aims to provide evidence about the quality of trauma care delivered by a major academic trauma service in South Africa to provide a temporal analysis of trauma trends in the city of Pietermaritzburg. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All trauma patients admitted by the Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Trauma Service (PMTS) for the period December 2012-April 2018 were retrieved from the Hybrid Electronic Medical Registry (HEMR) for analysis. RESULTS: Over the five-year period, a total of 8722 trauma patients were admitted to Grey's Hospital. There were 7242 (83.0%) males. The average age was 29.66 years. A total of 1719 (19.7%) patients less than 19 years of age, 377 (4.3%) older than 60 years of age and 1480 (17.0%) female patients were admitted following trauma. Table 3 breaks down the mechanism of trauma. A total of 5027 patients sustained blunt trauma (57.6%), and 3334 (38.5%) sustained penetrating trauma. A total of 4808 patients sustained intentional trauma implying that 55.1% of all trauma was secondary to grievous bodily harm or assault either in the form of a stab wound or GSW or of an assault. There was a total of 2232 road traffic-related incidents, of which 37.9% (845) were pedestrian victims. The mortality rate for all trauma admissions was 4.5% (396). Of these 396 deaths, 64 (16.2%) were classified at the morbidity and mortality conference as being avoidable. CONCLUSIONS: The HEMR has allowed us to track the burden of trauma presenting to our institution over a five-year period. This confirms previous studies over shorter time periods from our institution. The pattern of trauma has remained consistent, and the previously described high levels show no sign of decreasing. Interventions to try and reduce this burden are urgently required.

[Virtual reality simulation in orthopedics and trauma surgery in France : Current status and perspectives]. / "Virtual reality simulation" in der Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie in Frankreich : Aktueller Stand und Ausblick.

INTRODUCTION: The current reduction in working hours and the worldwide attempt to guarantee patient safety have led to significant changes in the training of surgical assistants. Numerous studies meanwhile present arthroscopic virtual reality (VR) simulators as very efficient tools for resident training. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Based on a meta-analysis of VR arthroscopy simulators that identified different levels of evidence and validity, the situation in France in 2017/2018 is described in response to the new French law prohibiting access to the operating theater without prior simulator training. RESULTS: A total of 7 prospective randomized trials were identified that were conducted between 2008 and 2016 in the field of knee and shoulder simulation training. Of the trials six were designed to assess transfer validity. Only four evaluated the simulation-based transfer of knowledge acquired in training to the operating room using an evaluation scale under real-world conditions with blinded assessors. Although France has not yet participated in transfer validation studies, VR simulator training was tested in a first national cohort and a large number of assistants were trained for 6 months. CONCLUSION: Even though evidence that the acquired skills can be validly transferred to the operating theater is still needed, especially for arthroscopy, simulation has already become an indispensable form of further training.

[Simulation techniques in surgical training programs to become an orthopedic and trauma surgeon : Introduction to the topic]. / Simulationstechniken in der Weiterbildung zum Orthopäden und Unfallchirurgen : Einführung zum Thema.

Numerous professional and societal developments nowadays fundamentally reduce the possibility of mastering all officially prescribed surgical training contents in sufficient quantities and in a target-oriented manner with sufficient operative internal clinical experience from the surgical daily routine. In order to learn key competences, modern simulation technology will have to be integrated into surgical training programs. A meaningful implementation requires a structured procedure for the users, individual clinics or surgical training networks. Financially, simulation is an expensive investment in training quality. The implementation of simulation technology can be a further impulse to design the structure of the continuing training landscape within the framework of a coordinated national or EU-wide overall training concept in such a way that the infrastructural, personnel and financial expenditure can be borne.

[Skills training and simulation in orthopedic and trauma surgery specialist training : Consequences of the amended model training regulations]. / Skillstraining und Simulation in der orthopädischen und unfallchirurgischen Facharztweiterbildung : Konsequenzen aus der novellierten Musterweiterbildungsordnung.

After 6 years of development, the amended regulations for medical education were adopted by the German Medical Assembly in May 2018. The aim of the amendment is to move away from a predominantly chronologically standardized further training towards a content standardized further training with simultaneous definition of competence objectives. The level of competence required for admission to the examination should be continuously recorded and documented in an electronic logbook. Failure to achieve the training objective will result in the admission to the examination being refused. These high requirements seem to be attainable only if cognitive and action competences can be acquired before and during training in the real environment of the operating theatre in a standardized setting.

Orthopedics and Traumatology Residency - Working Conditions, Training, and Psychological Stress.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The specialty of orthopedics and traumatology that is completed in the 5 years period in our country is a challenging educational process and our purpose in this study is to demonstrate through a survey training conditions of the orthopedic assistants in our country and the effects of this process on assistants. MATERIAL AND METHODS 524 (70.05%) of 748 assistants who receive specialization training in Turkey were reached. There were 20 multiple choice questions ( 1 mark each) and 3 questions (more than 1 mark each) in the survey consisting of twenty-three questions. Our study group was formed by doctors who have still worked as assistant in our country and have accepted to participate in the study. The doctors who finished assistantship with any reason and did assistantship for time less than 6 months and did not exactly fill the questionnaire form were excluded from the study. RESULTS 524 (71.97%) of 728 assistant who are in 40 (100%) of 40 provinces where assistant training given in Turkey were reached. 474 (90.45%) participants were satisfied to do orthopedic specialization. When considering working hours, it was observed that 337 (64.31%) participants had over 90 hours weekly including night shift and 521 (99.42%) participants had to work after night shift. The majority of participants (361 persons 68.89%) were receiving salaries between TL 4000-6000. When looking at the entire working group, the rate of participants who said that scientific training is weak or there is no scientific training was 427 (81.48%). CONCLUSIONS Our survey study is one of the first statistical study which investigating professional and social problems of orthopedic assistants. Some of important problems as training satisfaction, abuse by patients and/or manager, the average monthly income and psychological status assessment is emphasized. Orthopedics and Traumatology assistantship is a challenging process to cause physical and psychological problems with the hard working conditions in our Turkey. Key words:residency training, orthopedic surgery, life quality, salary.

A Consensus-Based Criterion Standard for the Requirement of a Trauma Team.

BACKGROUND: Trauma team activation (TTA) represents a considerable expenditure of trauma centre resources. It is mainly triggered by field triage criteria. The overall quality of the criteria may be evaluated based on the rate of over- and undertriage. However, there is no gold standard that defines which adult patients truly require a trauma team. The objective of this study was to develop consensus-based criteria defining the necessity for a trauma team. METHODS: A consensus group was formed by trauma specialists experienced in emergency and trauma care with a specific interest in field triage and having previously participated in guideline development. A literature search was conducted to identify criteria that have already been used or suggested. The initial list of criteria was discussed in two Delphi round and two consensus conferences. The entire process of discussion and voting was highly standardized and extensively documented, resulting in a final list of criteria. RESULTS: Initially 95 criteria were identified. This was subsequently reduced to 20 final criteria to appropriately indicate the requirement for attendance of a trauma team. The criteria address aspects related to injury severity, admission to an intensive care unit, death within 24 h, need for specified invasive procedures, need for surgical and/or interventional radiological procedures, and abnormal vital signs within a defined time period. CONCLUSIONS: The selected criteria may be applied as a tool for research and quality control concerning TTA. However, future studies are necessary to further evaluate for possible redundancy in criteria that may allow for further reduction in criteria.

Level of evidence and authorship trends of clinical studies in knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy, 1995-2015.

PURPOSE: There is increasing emphasis on publication quality and internationalization of author groups in orthopaedic literature. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the type of studies and the level of evidence (LOE) published in knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy (KSSTA) from 1995 to 2015. The secondary aim was to analyze trends in authorship characteristics in KSSTA. METHODS: Two reviewers reviewed the table of contents of KSSTA and identified original papers from 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2015. The reviewers graded LOE from Levels I to IV using guidelines from the University of Oxford's Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. For each article, the total number of authors and country of author group were also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 880 papers were analyzed. The proportions in LOE have stayed consistent throughout the study period (n.s.). There has been a significant increase in the number of published articles and the number of Level I and II studies (P < 0.01). Therapeutic articles were the most common type. The mean number of authors per KSSTA article significantly increased from 3.9 to 5.7 over the 20-year period (P < 0.01). The number of represented countries increased yearly and academic institutions from 40 different nationalities published articles in the Journal. Of the examined years, the percent of articles with international collaboration was 17.6%. CONCLUSION: The proportion of LOE I and II articles published in KSSTA remains consistently high. Therapeutic studies are the most frequently published articles. There is an increase in international groups publishing in KSSTA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

[Future perspective of the TraumaRegister DGU® : Further development, additional modules and potential limits]. / Zukunftsperspektiven des TraumaRegister DGU® : Weiterentwicklung, Zusatzmodule und potenzielle Grenzen.

Since its founding in 1993 the TraumaRegister DGU® has become one of the largest registries especially in terms of data diversity. Since the introduction of the TraumaNetzwerk DGU®, the TraumaRegister DGU® has enabled a quasi-nationwide picture of the quality of care of severely injured patients in Germany. The register is subject to constant development, under the guidance of the working groups of the German Society for Trauma Surgery (DGU). The first modular expansion of special injury entities (craniocerebral trauma and complex hand injuries) is currently taking place. The future developments will involve the extension of the register to certain injury patterns. The existing registry will also be supplemented with other recorded qualities (from the supplementary serum database up to the quality of life). This makes the TraumaRegister DGU® a tool for quality assurance and science which is well prepared for the future.

[Scientific impact of the TraumaRegister DGU®]. / Wissenschaftlicher Impact des TraumaRegister DGU®.

BACKGROUND: The trauma registry of the German Trauma Society (TraumaRegister DGU®) is not only a tool for quality management but also for research purposes. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the impact of the TraumaRegister DGU® on scientific output and patient treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Analysis of publications from the TraumaRegister DGU® with respect to numbers, impact factors, journals, citations and presentations. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The number and impact factors of publications from the TraumaRegister DGU® rose steeply during the last 10 years and in the last 3 years consisted of 25 publications per year. More than two thirds of them were published in high quality international journals and reflect the great scientific importance. For the German speaking readership and the specific aspects of treatment of the severely injured relevant to Germany, the large number of German language articles are just as important. Independent of the impact factor publications in Deutsches Ärzteblatt, the journal with the highest circulation and Der Unfallchirurg play the most important role. A large amount of scientific information gained from the TraumaRegister DGU® has been included in treatment guidelines and structures. The register is a basic prerequisite for the TraumaNetzwerk DGU®. Since almost all severely injured patients in Germany are now included in the registry, it is possible to obtain epidemiologically reliable data of treatment and outcomes for these patient groups.

[10 years German Society for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery (DGOU): trauma surgery-quo vadis?] / 10 Jahre DGOU: Unfallchirurgie ­ quo vadis?

On the occasion of the 10th anniversary of the foundation of the German Society for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery (DGOU), the current General Secretary of the German Society for Trauma Surgery sees the need for a standpoint on trauma surgery in Germany. This manuscript outlines future options and perspectives for the development of trauma surgery in Germany.

[The TraumaRegister DGU® dataset, its development over 25 years and advances in the care of severely injured patients]. / Der Datensatz des TraumaRegister DGU®, seine Entwicklung über 25 Jahre und Fortschritte in der Schwerverletzenversorgung.

BACKGROUND: Since the publication in 1993, the dataset and documentation form of the TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU) have continuously evolved. On the occasion of the 25th anniversary the authors have analyzed this evolution in order to reflect it in the light of medical progress in the treatment of the severely injured. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Enrolled in the study were 5 reference data entry sheets from the years 1993, 1996, 2002, 2009 and 2016. Every piece of information (item) queried therein was entered into the study database, was categorized by topic and counted for further analysis. RESULTS: The arrangement of the 4­page data entry form has remained practically unchanged since 1993 and includes an average of 212 items. A total of 491 items were identified of which 64 were present throughout every dataset. Based on the average extent of the form this equals a proportion of approximately 30%. The dataset actually shows much more consistency than this number suggests because many changes can be traced back to a smarter design of the data entry form. Most items fell into the categories "results/diagnosis" (143 items/29.1%), "coagulation" (104/21.2%) and "surgical approach" (40/8.1%). Many items serve as raw data for the calculation of prognostic risk scores, such as the trauma and injury severity score (TRISS), the revised injury severity classification II (RISC II) and the trauma associated severe hemorrhage (TASH) score. Currently, nine scores can be calculated from the dataset. CONCLUSION: The members of the working group TraumaRegister all actively participate in the treatment of severely injured patients. For 25 years this group has managed to unify the latest medical developments and well-established parameters within the TR-DGU dataset at a relatively constant degree of effort for documentation. Practice in place of theory is the driving force behind this development that serves quality assurance and research in the treatment of severely injured patients.

[Data content of the TraumaRegister DGU® : Results of a random sample control]. / Datengüte des TraumaRegister DGU® : Ergebnisse einer Stichprobenkontrolle.

BACKGROUND: Registries are becoming increasingly more important in clinical research. The TraumaRegister DGU® of the German Society for Trauma Surgery plays an excellent role with respect to the care of severely injured patients. AIM: Within the framework of this investigation the quality of data provided by this registry was to be verified. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Certified hospitals participating in the TraumaNetzwerk DGU® of the German Society for Trauma Surgery are obliged to submit data of treated severely injured patients to the TraumaRegister DGU®. Participating hospitals have to undergo a re-certification process every 3 years. Within the framework of this re-audit, data from 5 out of 8 randomly chosen patient cases included in the registry are controlled and compared to the patient files of the certified hospital. In the present investigation discrepancies concerning data provided were documented and the pattern of deviation was analyzed. RESULTS: The results of 1075 re-certification processes carried out in 631 hospitals including the documentation of 5409 checked patient cases from 2012-2017 were analyzed. The highest number of discrepancies detected concerned the documented time until initial CT (15.8%) and the lowest concerned the discharge site (3.2%). The majority of data sheets with discrepancies showed deviations in only one out of seven checked parameters. Interestingly, large trauma centers with a high throughput of severely injured patients showed the most deviations. CONCLUSION: The present investigation underlines the importance of standardized checks concerning data provided for registries in order to be able to guarantee an improvement in entering data.

[Endoprostheses in geriatric traumatology]. / Endoprothetik in der Alterstraumatologie.

BACKGROUND: Geriatric traumatology is increasing in importance due to the demographic transition. In cases of fractures close to large joints it is questionable whether primary joint replacement is advantageous compared to joint-preserving internal fixation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the importance of prosthetic joint replacement in the treatment of geriatric patients suffering from frequent periarticular fractures in comparison to osteosynthetic joint reconstruction and conservative methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A selective search of the literature was carried out to identify studies and recommendations concerned with primary arthroplasty of fractures in the region of the various joints (hip, shoulder, elbow and knee). RESULTS: The importance of primary arthroplasty in geriatric traumatology differs greatly between the various joints. Implantation of a prosthesis has now become the gold standard for displaced fractures of the femoral neck. In addition, reverse shoulder arthroplasty has become an established alternative option to osteosynthesis in the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures. Due to a lack of large studies definitive recommendations cannot yet be given for fractures around the elbow and the knee. Nowadays, joint replacement for these fractures is recommended only if reconstruction of the joint surface is not possible. CONCLUSION: The importance of primary joint replacement for geriatric fractures will probably increase in the future. Further studies with larger patient numbers must be conducted to achieve more confidence in decision making between joint replacement and internal fixation especially for shoulder, elbow and knee joints.