Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 245
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Mol Genet Metab ; 134(1-2): 8-19, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34483044

RESUMO

Heterozygous (carrier) status for an autosomal recessive condition is traditionally considered to lack significance for an individual's health, but this assumption has been challenged by a growing body of evidence. Carriers of several autosomal recessive disorders and some X-linked diseases are potentially at risk for the pathology manifest in homozygotes. This minireview provides an overview of the literature regarding health risks to carriers of two common autosomal recessive conditions on the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel: sickle cell disease [sickle cell trait (SCT)] and cystic fibrosis (CF). We also consider and comment on bioethical and policy implications for newborn blood screening (NBS). Health risks for heterozygotes, while relatively low for individuals, are often influenced by intrinsic (e.g., other genomic variants or co-morbidities) and extrinsic (environmental) factors, which present opportunities for personalized genomic medicine and risk counseling. They create a special challenge, however, for developing screening/follow-up policies and for genetic counseling, particularly after identification and reporting of heterozygote status through NBS. Although more research is needed, this minireview of the SCT and CF literature to date leads us to propose that blanket terms such as "healthy heterozygotes" or "unaffected carriers" should be superseded in communications about NBS results, in favor of a more nuanced paradigm of setting expectations for health outcomes with "genotype-to-risk." In the molecular era of NBS, it remains clear that public health needs to become better prepared for the full range of applied genetics.


Assuntos
Triagem de Portadores Genéticos/legislação & jurisprudência , Triagem de Portadores Genéticos/métodos , Heterozigoto , Triagem Neonatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Triagem Neonatal/métodos , Anemia Falciforme/diagnóstico , Fibrose Cística/diagnóstico , Triagem de Portadores Genéticos/normas , Medicina Genômica , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Triagem Neonatal/normas
2.
Mol Genet Metab ; 134(1-2): 3-7, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34384699

RESUMO

Newborn screening (NBS) is more than 50 years old and has proven to be a powerful and successful public health system. NBS must be regarded as a system and not simply as a test. We need to work as a community to improve the culture of safety for the NBS system and thereby to reduce the risk of babies being missed by the NBS system. Adding new technologies will not prevent system failures; that will require adherence to the culture of safety. Some have argued that every newborn should have their genome sequenced at birth and this sequencing could be part of NBS. However, NBS has depended on biomarker phenotypes throughout its history and our understanding of the relationships between genotype and phenotype is imperfect. Therefore, we should avoid being seduced by genomic sequencing technology and continue to focus on phenotypic biomarkers in NBS.


Assuntos
Erros Inatos do Metabolismo/diagnóstico , Triagem Neonatal/métodos , Triagem Neonatal/normas , Saúde Pública/legislação & jurisprudência , Saúde Pública/normas , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Triagem Neonatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Pais , Saúde Pública/métodos , Tecnologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Tecnologia/métodos , Tecnologia/normas
3.
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet ; 15: 461-480, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25184533

RESUMO

This review highlights emerging areas of interest in public health genomics. First, we describe recent advances in newborn screening (NBS), with a focus on the practice and policy implications of current and future efforts to expand NBS programs (e.g., via next-generation sequencing). Next, we detail research findings from the rapidly progressing field of epigenetics and epigenomics, highlighting ways in which our emerging understanding in these areas could guide future intervention and research efforts in public health. We close by considering various ethical, legal, and social issues posed by recent developments in public health genomics; these include policies to regulate access to personal genomic information, the need to enhance genetic literacy in both health professionals and the public, and challenges in ensuring that the benefits (and burdens) of genomic discoveries and applications are equitably distributed. We also note needs for future genomic research that integrates across basic and social sciences.


Assuntos
Genômica/ética , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Triagem Neonatal/ética , Saúde Pública/ética , Epigenômica/ética , Epigenômica/legislação & jurisprudência , Genômica/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Triagem Neonatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Saúde Pública/legislação & jurisprudência
5.
Ear Hear ; 38(5): 638-642, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28471783

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: All US states and territories have an Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) program to facilitate early hearing evaluation and intervention for infants who are deaf or hard of hearing. To ensure efficient coordination of care, the state EHDI programs rely heavily on audiologists' prompt reporting of a newborn's hearing status. Several states have regulations requiring mandatory reporting of a newborn's hearing status. This is an important public health responsibility of pediatric audiologists. Reasons for failing to report vary. DESIGN: The Early Hearing Detection and Intervention-Pediatric Audiology Links to Services (EHDI) facility survey was used to inform reporting compliance of audiology facilities throughout the United States. The survey was disseminated via articles, newsletters, and call-to-action notices to audiologists. RESULTS: Among 1024 facilities surveyed, 88 (8.6%) reported that they did not report newborn's hearing findings to their state EHDI program. Not knowing how to report to the state EHDI program was the most frequently chosen reason (60%). However, among the 936 facilities that were compliant with the reporting requirements, 51 estimated that they reported less than two-third of all hearing evaluation results (5.4%). Some facilities did not report a normal-hearing result and some failed to report because they assumed another facility would report the hearing results. CONCLUSIONS: Survey results indicated that audiologists were compliant reporting hearing results to the state EHDI programs. However, there is room for improvement. Regular provider outreach and training by the state EHDI program is necessary to ensure those who are not reporting will comply and to clarify reporting requirements for those who are already compliant.


Assuntos
Audiologia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Perda Auditiva/diagnóstico , Triagem Neonatal , Governo Estadual , Audiometria , Diagnóstico Precoce , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Notificação de Abuso , Triagem Neonatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos
6.
JAMA ; 318(21): 2111-2118, 2017 Dec 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29209720

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: In 2011, critical congenital heart disease was added to the US Recommended Uniform Screening Panel for newborns, but whether state implementation of screening policies has been associated with infant death rates is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether there was an association between implementation of state newborn screening policies for critical congenital heart disease and infant death rates. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational study with group-level analyses. A difference-in-differences analysis was conducted using the National Center for Health Statistics' period linked birth/infant death data set files for 2007-2013 for 26 546 503 US births through June 30, 2013, aggregated by month and state of birth. EXPOSURES: State policies were classified as mandatory or nonmandatory (including voluntary policies and mandates that were not yet implemented). As of June 1, 2013, 8 states had implemented mandatory screening policies, 5 states had voluntary screening policies, and 9 states had adopted but not yet implemented mandates. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Numbers of early infant deaths (between 24 hours and 6 months of age) coded for critical congenital heart disease or other/unspecified congenital cardiac causes for each state-month birth cohort. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2013, there were 2734 deaths due to critical congenital heart disease and 3967 deaths due to other/unspecified causes. Critical congenital heart disease death rates in states with mandatory screening policies were 8.0 (95% CI, 5.4-10.6) per 100 000 births (n = 37) in 2007 and 6.4 (95% CI, 2.9-9.9) per 100 000 births (n = 13) in 2013 (for births by the end of July); for other/unspecified cardiac causes, death rates were 11.7 (95% CI, 8.6-14.8) per 100 000 births in 2007 (n = 54) and 10.3 (95% CI, 5.9-14.8) per 100 000 births (n = 21) in 2013. Early infant deaths from critical congenital heart disease through December 31, 2013, decreased by 33.4% (95% CI, 10.6%-50.3%), with an absolute decline of 3.9 (95% CI, 3.6-4.1) deaths per 100 000 births after states implemented mandatory screening compared with prior periods and states without screening policies. Early infant deaths from other/unspecified cardiac causes declined by 21.4% (95% CI, 6.9%-33.7%), with an absolute decline of 3.5 (95% CI, 3.2-3.8) deaths per 100 000 births. No significant decrease was associated with nonmandatory screening policies. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Statewide implementation of mandatory policies for newborn screening for critical congenital heart disease was associated with a significant decrease in infant cardiac deaths between 2007 and 2013 compared with states without these policies.


Assuntos
Cardiopatias Congênitas/diagnóstico , Cardiopatias Congênitas/mortalidade , Mortalidade Infantil , Programas Obrigatórios , Triagem Neonatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Governo Estadual , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Mortalidade/tendências , Triagem Neonatal/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Estatísticas Vitais
7.
Ann Ig ; 29(2): 116-122, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28244580

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the state of implementation of the Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Italy and to determine the effect that an ad hoc legislation may have on the percentage of infants screened for detection of hearing impairment in nurseries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Italian Newborn Hearing Screening data were obtained during four national surveys (years 2003, 2006, 2008, and 2011). The screening rates obtained by the Regions which adopted or did not adopt a legislation to increase the newborns' coverage were compared. RESULTS: In 2011, the average coverage rate was 78.3%, but in 12 out of 20 Regions it exceeded 95%. Coverage rate was greater in Regions that implemented an ad hoc legislation compared to Regions that did not. As a matter of fact, Regions which passed the legislation screened more than 95% of infants, whereas Regions without legislation reported a mean screening rate of nearly 67% of newborns. CONCLUSION: Current results seem to confirm that a specific legislation might have a decisive effect on the increase of rate of coverage of newborn hearing screenings.


Assuntos
Transtornos da Audição/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Audição/epidemiologia , Testes Auditivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Triagem Neonatal , Berçários Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Transtornos da Audição/congênito , Transtornos da Audição/prevenção & controle , Testes Auditivos/tendências , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Itália/epidemiologia , Triagem Neonatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Triagem Neonatal/normas , Triagem Neonatal/tendências , Berçários Hospitalares/legislação & jurisprudência
8.
Milbank Q ; 94(2): 366-91, 2016 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27265561

RESUMO

POLICY POINTS: Newborn screening not only saves lives but can also yield net societal economic benefit, in addition to benefits such as improved quality of life to affected individuals and families. Calculations of net economic benefit from newborn screening include the monetary equivalent of avoided deaths and reductions in costs of care for complications associated with late-diagnosed individuals minus the additional costs of screening, diagnosis, and treatment associated with prompt diagnosis. Since 2001 the Washington State Department of Health has successfully implemented an approach to conducting evidence-based economic evaluations of disorders proposed for addition to the state-mandated newborn screening panel. CONTEXT: Economic evaluations can inform policy decisions on the expansion of newborn screening panels. This article documents the use of cost-benefit models in Washington State as part of the rule-making process that resulted in the implementation of screening for medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency and 4 other metabolic disorders in 2004, cystic fibrosis (CF) in 2006, 15 other metabolic disorders in 2008, and severe combined immune deficiency (SCID) in 2014. METHODS: We reviewed Washington State Department of Health internal reports and spreadsheet models of expected net societal benefit of adding disorders to the state newborn screening panel. We summarize the assumptions and findings for 2 models (MCAD and CF) and discuss them in relation to findings in the peer-reviewed literature. FINDINGS: The MCAD model projected a benefit-cost ratio of 3.4 to 1 based on assumptions of a 20.0 percentage point reduction in infant mortality and a 13.9 percentage point reduction in serious developmental disability. The CF model projected a benefit-cost ratio of 4.0-5.4 to 1 for a discount rate of 3%-4% and a plausible range of 1-2 percentage point reductions in deaths up to age 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: The Washington State cost-benefit models of newborn screening were broadly consistent with peer-reviewed literature, and their findings of net benefit appear to be robust to uncertainty in parameters. Public health newborn screening programs can develop their own capacity to project expected costs and benefits of expansion of newborn screening panels, although it would be most efficient if this capacity were shared among programs.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício/legislação & jurisprudência , Intervenção Médica Precoce/economia , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Triagem Neonatal/economia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Análise Custo-Benefício/métodos , Fibrose Cística/diagnóstico , Fibrose Cística/economia , Fibrose Cística/terapia , Intervenção Médica Precoce/legislação & jurisprudência , Política de Saúde/economia , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Modelos Econômicos , Triagem Neonatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Washington
9.
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents ; 30(3): 909-914, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27655520

RESUMO

Starting from an international overview of the current status of screening programs, the present paper focuses on the legal situation in Italy and the great differences among Italian regions. Since the introduction of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) in the ‘90s the paradigm “one spot-one disease” changed. Only recently, some regions issued legislative acts to promote expanded newborn screening with MS/MS. This approach raises medico-legal and ethical issues because a fast neonatal diagnosis of an inborn error of metabolism (IEM) could increase chances of an early treatment and reduce disabilities, therefore citizens ought to have the same access to care countrywide. Enacting a mandatory standard for a disease screening panel using MS/MS and a few centers specialized in diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients affected by IEM (inborn errors of metabolism) can reduce legal and ethical issues.


Assuntos
Erros Inatos do Metabolismo/diagnóstico , Triagem Neonatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Diagnóstico Precoce , Geografia Médica/legislação & jurisprudência , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Itália/epidemiologia , Programas Obrigatórios/ética , Programas Obrigatórios/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas Obrigatórios/normas , Erros Inatos do Metabolismo/epidemiologia , Triagem Neonatal/ética , Triagem Neonatal/métodos , Triagem Neonatal/normas , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem
10.
Am J Bioeth ; 16(1): 11-7, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26734736

RESUMO

Critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) screening is rapidly becoming the standard of care in the United States after being added to the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) in 2011. Newborn screens typically do not require affirmative parental consent. In fact, most states allow parents to exempt their baby from receiving the required screen on the basis of religious or personally held beliefs. There are many ethical considerations implicated with allowing parents to exempt their child from newborn screening for CCHD. Considerations include the treatment of religious exemptions in our current legal system, as well as medical and ethical principles in relation to the rights of infants. Although there are significant benefits to screening newborns for CCHD, when a parent refuses for religious or personal beliefs, in the case of CCHD screening, the parental decision should stand.


Assuntos
Cardiopatias Congênitas/diagnóstico , Triagem Neonatal/ética , Triagem Neonatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Oximetria , Consentimento dos Pais , Religião e Medicina , Aconselhamento , Feminino , Humanos , Bem-Estar do Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Legislação Médica/ética , Legislação Médica/tendências , Masculino , Triagem Neonatal/instrumentação , Triagem Neonatal/métodos , Oximetria/ética , Consentimento dos Pais/ética , Consentimento dos Pais/legislação & jurisprudência , Pais , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos
11.
Neonatal Netw ; 35(5): 321-6, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27636697

RESUMO

Gestational substance exposure continues to be a significant problem. Neonates may be exposed to various substances including illicit drugs, prescription drugs, and other legal substances that are best not used during pregnancy because of their potential deleterious effects as possible teratogens or their potential to create dependence and thus withdrawal in the neonate. Screening the newborn for gestational substance exposure is important for both acute care and early intervention to promote the best possible long-term outcomes. This column provides insight into what is known about the extent of substance use by pregnant women, an overview of neonatal biologic matrices for drug testing, and a discussion of the legal implications of neonatal substance screening.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Abstinência Neonatal/diagnóstico , Triagem Neonatal/métodos , Complicações na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Síndrome de Abstinência Neonatal/etiologia , Triagem Neonatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Gravidez , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos
12.
W V Med J ; 112(4): 42-6, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27491102

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In March 2012 the West Virginia legislature passed a law that mandates birth hospitals to perform pulse oximetry screening for all well-babies in the newborn nursery to improve the detection of critical congenital heart disease (CCHD). CCHD screening data collection began on September 1, 2012 at all 28 birthing hospitals. The purpose of this study was to review the first year of pulse oximetry screening outcomes and identify barriers to implementation and solutions to improve tracking and policy. METHODS: All WV birth hospitals were provided with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services recommendations for CCHD screening, and the Center for Disease Control's recommended screening algorithm for review and reference. 20,115 infants were entered into the Birth Score database between September 1, 2012 and August 31, 2013. 19,283 (91%) infants were screened for CCHD. RESULTS: 17,101 (88.5%) infants passed, 19 infants failed, and 2,163 (11.2%) infants had missing data for the screening. 832 infants were not screened due to being admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit for reasons unknown. 17 of the 19 infants who failed the screening had a transthoracic echo report available for review. Of those 17 infants reviewed, seven were diagnosed with CCHD. CONCLUSIONS: 85% of the infants born in WV who received a Birth Score during the year reviewed were screened for CCHD. Given that the goal is to have 100% compliance with the pulse oximetry screening, additional investigations into factors affecting compliance may be necessary.


Assuntos
Cardiopatias Congênitas/diagnóstico , Triagem Neonatal/métodos , Oximetria/métodos , Ecocardiografia , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Cardiopatias Congênitas/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Programas Obrigatórios , Triagem Neonatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Berçários Hospitalares , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , West Virginia
13.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 64(23): 625-30, 2015 Jun 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26086632

RESUMO

Critical congenital heart defects (CCHD) occur in approximately two of every 1,000 live births. Newborn screening provides an opportunity for reducing infant morbidity and mortality. In September 2011, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary endorsed the recommendation that critical congenital heart defects be added to the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) for all newborns. In 2014, CDC collaborated with the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Division of State Government Affairs and the Newborn Screening Technical Assistance and Evaluation Program (NewSTEPs) to assess states' actions for adopting newborn screening for CCHD. Forty-three states have taken action toward newborn screening for CCHD through legislation, regulations, or hospital guidelines. Among those 43, 32 (74%) are collecting or planning to collect CCHD screening data; however, the type of data collected by CCHD newborn screening programs varies by state. State mandates for newborn screening for CCHD will likely increase the number of newborns screened, allowing for the possibility of early identification and prevention of morbidity and mortality. Data collection at the state level is important for surveillance, monitoring of outcomes, and evaluation of state CCHD newborn screening programs.


Assuntos
Cardiopatias Congênitas/diagnóstico , Hospitais , Triagem Neonatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Coleta de Dados , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Estados Unidos
14.
J Med Ethics ; 40(8): 558-62, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23592379

RESUMO

Newborn screening programmes began in the 1960s, have traditionally been conducted without parental permission and have grown dramatically in the last decade. Whether these programmes serve patients' best interests has recently become a point of controversy. Privacy advocates, concerned that newborn screening infringes upon individual liberties, are demanding fundamental changes to these programmes. These include parental permission and limiting the research on the blood samples obtained, an agenda at odds with the viewpoints of newborn screening advocates. This essay presents the history of newborn screening in the USA, with attention to factors that have contributed to concerns about these programmes. The essay suggests that the rapid increase in the number of disorders screened for and the addition of research without either public knowledge or informed consent were critical to the development of resistance to mandatory newborn screening and research. Future newborn screening initiatives should include public education and comment to ensure continued support.


Assuntos
Testes Genéticos/ética , Triagem Neonatal/ética , Consentimento dos Pais/ética , Defesa do Paciente/ética , Testes Genéticos/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Triagem Neonatal/economia , Triagem Neonatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Consentimento dos Pais/legislação & jurisprudência , Defesa do Paciente/legislação & jurisprudência , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Fenilcetonúrias/diagnóstico , Privacidade/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos
15.
Bull Acad Natl Med ; 198(4-5): 781-96; discussion 796-9, 2014.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26753409

RESUMO

In France, universal newborn hearing screening has been mandatory since April23rd, 2012, but it began in the Champagne-Ardenne region on January 15th 2004. More than 99 % of 160 196 newborns have since been systematically screened in this region. Bilateral hearing impairment was thus identified in 116 infants when they were around 3.5 months old. Earlier diagnosis improves the outcome of deafness, which is only diagnosed around age 20 months without screening. The authors report their experience and the lessons learnt.


Assuntos
Transtornos da Audição/diagnóstico , Triagem Neonatal , Algoritmos , Comorbidade , Anormalidades Congênitas/epidemiologia , Diagnóstico Precoce , Potenciais Evocados Auditivos , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Transtornos da Audição/epidemiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Masculino , Centros de Saúde Materno-Infantil/provisão & distribuição , Prontuários Médicos , Triagem Neonatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Triagem Neonatal/métodos , Triagem Neonatal/organização & administração , Triagem Neonatal/estatística & dados numéricos , Emissões Otoacústicas Espontâneas , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos
17.
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci ; 50(6): 142-62, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24295058

RESUMO

Inborn errors of metabolism (IEM) are a phenotypically and genetically heterogeneous group of disorders caused by a defect in a metabolic pathway, leading to malfunctioning metabolism and/or the accumulation of toxic intermediate metabolites. To date, more than 1000 different IEM have been identified. While individually rare, the cumulative incidence has been shown to be upwards of 1 in 800. Clinical presentations are protean, complicating diagnostic pathways. IEM are present in all ethnic groups and across every age. Some IEM are amenable to treatment, with promising outcomes. However, high clinical suspicion alone is not sufficient to reduce morbidities and mortalities. In the last decade, due to the advent of tandem mass spectrometry, expanded newborn screening (NBS) has become a mandatory public health strategy in most developed and developing countries. The technology allows inexpensive simultaneous detection of more than 30 different metabolic disorders in one single blood spot specimen at a cost of about USD 10 per baby, with commendable analytical accuracy and precision. The sensitivity and specificity of this method can be up to 99% and 99.995%, respectively, for most amino acid disorders, organic acidemias, and fatty acid oxidation defects. Cost-effectiveness studies have confirmed that the savings achieved through the use of expanded NBS programs are significantly greater than the costs of implementation. The adverse effects of false positive results are negligible in view of the economic health benefits generated by expanded NBS and these could be minimized through increased education, better communication, and improved technologies. Local screening agencies should be given the autonomy to develop their screening programs in order to keep pace with international advancements. The development of biochemical genetics is closely linked with expanded NBS. With ongoing advancements in nanotechnology and molecular genomics, the field of biochemical genetics is still expanding rapidly. The potential of tandem mass spectrometry is extending to cover more disorders. Indeed, the use of genetic markers in T-cell receptor excision circles for severe combined immunodeficiency is one promising example. NBS represents the highest volume of genetic testing. It is more than a test and it warrants systematic healthcare service delivery across the pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical phases. There should be a comprehensive reporting system entailing genetic counselling as well as short-term and long-term follow-up. It is essential to integrate existing clinical IEM services with the expanded NBS program to enable close communication between the laboratory, clinicians, and allied health parties. In this review, we will discuss the history of IEM, its clinical presentations in children and adult patients, and its incidence among different ethnicities; the history and recent expansion of NBS, its cost-effectiveness, associated pros and cons, and the ethical issues that can arise; the analytical aspects of tandem mass spectrometry and post-analytical perspectives regarding result interpretation.


Assuntos
Erros Inatos do Metabolismo/diagnóstico , Triagem Neonatal/métodos , Saúde Global , Humanos , Incidência , Recém-Nascido , Legislação Médica , Erros Inatos do Metabolismo/epidemiologia , Erros Inatos do Metabolismo/genética , Erros Inatos do Metabolismo/fisiopatologia , Triagem Neonatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Triagem Neonatal/tendências , Consentimento dos Pais/legislação & jurisprudência
18.
Genet Med ; 15(3): 234-45, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23429433

RESUMO

The genetic testing and genetic screening of children are commonplace. Decisions about whether to offer genetic testing and screening should be driven by the best interest of the child. The growing literature on the psychosocial and clinical effects of such testing and screening can help inform best practices. This technical report provides ethical justification and empirical data in support of the proposed policy recommendations regarding such practices in a myriad of settings.


Assuntos
Testes Genéticos/ética , Testes Genéticos/legislação & jurisprudência , Triagem Neonatal/ética , Triagem Neonatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Ética Médica , Humanos , Recém-Nascido
19.
Nat Genet ; 20(1): 15-7, 1998 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9731523

RESUMO

We discuss some societal and legal ramifications of the human genetics revolution. Our reflections were stimulated by discussions among scientists, citizens and legal experts at a large public symposium. We outline key issues regarding oversight of genetic research on human subjects, banking of DNA data by governments and corporations, the potential impact of behavioural genetics and effects upon racial and racist thinking. We contend that, in some cases, well-intentioned but naive efforts to protect the rights of individuals and groups may hurt everyone by blocking the progress of useful research.


Assuntos
Bases de Dados Factuais , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos , Ética Médica , Privacidade Genética , Pesquisa em Genética , Genética Médica , Genoma Humano , Medição de Risco , Bases de Dados Factuais/legislação & jurisprudência , Indústria Farmacêutica , Governo Federal , Genética Comportamental , Genética Médica/legislação & jurisprudência , Regulamentação Governamental , Projeto Genoma Humano , Humanos , Aplicação da Lei , Triagem Neonatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Triagem Neonatal/métodos , Triagem Neonatal/tendências , Preconceito , Sujeitos da Pesquisa , Consentimento do Representante Legal , Reino Unido , Estados Unidos
20.
Genet Med ; 14(1): 129-34, 2012 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22237442

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Advances in technology have made newborn screening for more than 50 inborn errors of metabolism possible using a dried blood sample. A framework is proposed that public health practitioners may use when considering candidate disorders for newborn screening panels. METHODS: The framework expands on the 10 Wilson-Jungner criteria with the addition of 11 criteria specific to newborn screening. A calculation, the "pNBS Decision Score," is used to quantify results and rank candidate disorders. RESULTS: The pNBS Decision Scores that were calculated for phenylketonuria (OMIM# 261600), cystic fibrosis (OMIM# 219700), Pompe disease (OMIM# 232300), and severe combined immunodeficiency (OMIM# 102700) support their inclusion as newborn screening disorders. The pNBS Decision Score suggests that Krabbe disease (OMIM# 245200) is not a candidate disorder for inclusion at this time. CONCLUSION: The proposed framework adds to the ability of policy makers to quantify an essential portion of the process for adding disorders to newborn screening panels. Other factors such as ethical, legal, and social issues, clinical utility, and advocacy are also part of the policy process. The framework is not intended to replace existing nomination processes but rather to enhance those processes by encouraging iterative review of newborn screening-specific criteria. The use of the framework will provide consistency across a portion of the decision process. The public health community should take the opportunity to revisit the screening determinants of the Wilson-Jungner criteria from a 21st century perspective. The results suggest that this framework provides the public health practitioner with a consistent process for making an evidence-based decision.


Assuntos
Testes Genéticos/normas , Triagem Neonatal/normas , Saúde Pública/normas , Doenças Genéticas Inatas/diagnóstico , Testes Genéticos/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Triagem Neonatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Saúde Pública/legislação & jurisprudência
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA