Blood Biomarkers for the Management of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: Despite the use of validated guidelines in the management of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), processes to limit unnecessary brain scans are still not sufficient and need to be improved. The use of blood biomarkers represents a relevant adjunct to identify patients at risk for intracranial injury requiring computed tomography (CT) scan. CONTENT: Biomarkers currently recommended in the management of mTBI in adults and children are discussed in this review. Protein S100 beta (S100B) is the best-documented blood biomarker due to its validation in large observational and interventional studies. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxyterminal hydrolase L-1 (UCH-L1) have also recently demonstrated their usefulness in patients with mTBI. Preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical performance are presented to aid in their interpretation in clinical practice. Finally, new perspectives on biomarkers and mTBI are discussed. SUMMARY: In adults, the inclusion of S100B in Scandinavian and French guidelines has reduced the need for CT scans by at least 30%. S100B has significant potential as a diagnostic biomarker, but limitations include its rapid half-life, which requires blood collection within 3 h of trauma, and its lack of neurospecificity. In 2018, the FDA approved the use of combined determination of GFAP and UCH-L1 to aid in the assessment of mTBI. Since 2022, new French guidelines also recommend the determination of GFAP and UCH-L1 in order to target a larger number of patients (sampling within 12 h post-injury) and optimize the reduction of CT scans. In the future, new cut-offs related to age and promising new biomarkers are expected for both diagnostic and prognostic applications.

Minor head injury in anticoagulated patients: performance of biomarkers S100B, NSE, GFAP, UCH-L1 and Alinity TBI in the detection of intracranial injury. A prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Data in literature indicate that in patients suffering a minor head injury (MHI), biomarkers serum levels could be effective to predict the absence of intracranial injury (ICI) on head CT scan. Use of these biomarkers in case of patients taking oral anticoagulants who experience MHI is very limited. We investigated biomarkers as predictors of ICI in anticoagulated patients managed in an ED. METHODS: We conducted a single-cohort, prospective, observational study in an ED. Our structured clinical pathway included a first head CT scan, 24 h observation and a second CT scan. The outcome was delayed ICI (dICI), defined as ICI on the second CT scan after a first negative CT scan. We assessed the sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), negative predictive value (NNV) and positive predictive value (PPV) of the biomarkers S100B, NSE, GFAP, UCH-L1 and Alinity TBI in order to identify dICI. RESULTS: Our study population was of 234 patients with a negative first CT scan who underwent a second CT scan. The rate of dICI was 4.7 %. The NPV for the detection of dICI were respectively (IC 95 %): S100B 92.7 % (86.0-96.8 %,); ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) 91.8 % (83.8-96.6 %); glial fibrillary protein (GFP) 100 % (83.2-100 %); TBI 100 % (66.4-100 %). The AUC for the detection of dICI was 0.407 for S100B, 0.563 for neuron-specific enolase (NSE), 0.510 for UCH-L1 and 0.720 for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The NPV of the analyzed biomarkers were high and they potentially could limit the number of head CT scan for detecting dICI in anticoagulated patients suffering MHI. GFAP and Alinity TBI seem to be effective to rule out a dCI, but future trials are needed.

Comparison of GFAP and UCH-L1 Measurements Using Two Automated Immunoassays (i-STAT® and Alinity®) for the Management of Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Preliminary Results from a French Single-Center Approach.

The measurement of blood glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) may assist in the management of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). This study aims to compare GFAP and UCH-L1 values measured using a handheld device with those measured using a core laboratory platform. We enrolled 230 mTBI patients at intermediate risk of complications. Following French guidelines, a negative S100B value permits the patient to be discharged without a computed tomography scan. Plasma GFAP and UCH-L1 levels were retrospectively measured using i-STAT® and Alinity® i analyzers in patients managed within 12 h post-trauma. Our analysis indicates a strong correlation of biomarker measurements between the two analyzers. Cohen's kappa coefficients and Lin's concordance coefficients were both ≥0.7, while Spearman's correlation coefficient was 0.94 for GFAP and 0.90 for UCH-L1. Additionally, the diagnostic performance in identifying an intracranial lesion was not significantly different between the two analyzers, with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of approximately 30%. GFAP and UCH-L1 levels measured using Abbott's i-STAT® and Alinity® i platform assays are highly correlated both analytically and clinically in a cohort of 230 patients managed for mTBI according to French guidelines.

Age-Dependent Differences in Blood Levels of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein but Not Ubiquitin Carboxy-Terminal Hydrolase L1 in Children.

OBJECTIVES: Despite the growing evidence of the clinical utility of blood-brain biomarkers in adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI), less is known about the performance of these biomarkers in children. We characterize age-dependent differences in levels of ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in children without TBI. METHODS: Plasma biobank specimens from children and adolescents aged 0-<19 years without TBI were obtained, and UCH-L1 and GFAP levels were quantified. The relationship between age and biomarker expression was determined using previously defined aged epochs (<3.5 years, 3.5 years to <11 years, 11 years and older), then biomarker levels were compared with established thresholds for ruling out the need for a head CT in adults with a mild TBI (mTBI) (UCH-L1 400 pg/mL, GFAP 35 pg/mL). RESULTS: The age range of the 366 control patients was 3 months-18 years. There was a significant negative association between age and GFAP but not UCH-L1. Only 1.4% of samples exceeded the UCH-L1 cutoff; however, 20% of samples exceeded the GFAP cutoff and 100% children younger than 3.5 years had values that exceeded the cutoff. DISCUSSION: Age seems to modify physiologic plasma GFAP levels. Diagnostic cutoffs for TBI based on GFAP but not UCH-L1 and may need to be adjusted in children younger than 11 years.

Predicting Role of GFAP and UCH-L1 biomarkers in Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: a preliminary study to evaluate in the short-term their correlation with severity of bleeding and prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (sSAH) is a severe brain vascular accident. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) can be theoretically assayed to predict a patient's progression, picturing different aspects of clinical failure after sSAH. The study aims to: a) explore the correlation between sSAH blood volume and biomarkers variation; b) evaluate if these can be predictive of the neurogenic response after sSAH and be prognostic of patient outcome; c) establish eventual threshold levels of biomarkers to define patients' clinical outcome. METHODS: Blood volumetry at CT scan upon admission, GFAP and UCH-L1 were collected at 24 h, at 72 h, and after 7 days from hemorrhage. Trends and cut-off serum sampling were determined. Clinical outcome was assessed with mRS scale at 14 days. RESULTS: A strong correlation between GFAP and UCH-L1 and blood diffusion volume in all explored serum intervals related to unfavorable outcome. GFAP and UCH-L1 were very early predictors of unfavorable outcomes at 24 h from sSAH (p = 0.002 and 0.011 respectively). Threshold levels of UCH-L1 apparently revealed a very early, early and late predictor of unfavorable outcomes. CONCLUSION: GFAP and UCH-L1 represent a potential tool for prompt monitoring and customization of therapies in neurosurgical patients.

Evaluating the utility of serum NfL, GFAP, UCHL1 and tTAU as estimates of CSF levels and diagnostic instrument in neuroinflammation and multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the utility of neurofilament light chain (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCHL1) and total tau (tTAU) serum concentrations as approximation for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of the respective biomarkers in the context of neuroinflammation and multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: NfL, GFAP, UCHL1 and tTAU concentrations in serum and CSF were measured in 183 patients (122 with neuroinflammatory disease and 61 neurological or somatoform disease controls) using the single molecule array HD-1 analyzer (Quanterix, Boston, MA). Spearman's rank correlations were computed between serum and CSF concentrations. In a second step, the effects of age, BMI, gadolinium-enhancing lesions in MRI, integrity of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and presence of acute relapse were accounted for by computing partial correlations. The analyses were repeated for a subsample consisting of MS phenotype patients only (n = 118). EDSS, MS disease activity and acute relapse were considered as additional covariates. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed for each serum/CSF biomarker concentration to assess how well the particular biomarker concentration differentiates MS patients from somatoform disease controls. Correlations between serum and CSF levels as well as area under the curve (AUC) values were compared for the different biomarkers using z-test statistics. RESULTS: Serum concentrations correlated positively with CSF levels for NfL (r = 0.705, p < 0.01) as well as for GFAP (r = 0.259, p < 0.01). Correlation coefficients were significantly higher for NfL than for GFAP (z = 5.492, p < 0.01). We found no significant serum-CSF correlations for UCHL1 or tTAU. After adjusting for covariates, the results remained unchanged. In the analysis focusing only on MS patients, the results were replicated. ROC analysis demonstrated similarly acceptable performance of serum and CSF NfL values in differentiating MS phenotype patients from somatoform disease controls. AUC values were significantly higher for serum and CSF NfL compared to other biomarkers. CONCLUSION: NfL and GFAP but not UCHL1 or tTAU serum concentrations are associated with CSF levels of the respective biomarker. NfL exhibits more robust correlations between its serum and CSF concentrations as compared to GFAP independently from BBB integrity, clinical and radiological covariates. Both serum and CSF NfL values differentiate between MS and controls.

Exploratory analysis of glial fibrillary acidic protein and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 in management of patients with mild neurological symptoms undergoing head computed tomography scan at the emergency department: a pilot study from a Croatian tertiary hospital.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic accuracy of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) in identification of intracranial abnormalities detected by computed tomography (CT) in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), and in patients with mild neurological symptoms not caused by head trauma but suspected with a neurological disorder, was examined. METHODS: GFAP and UCH-L1 were determined using the chemiluminescence immunoassays on the Alinity i analyzer (Abbott Laboratories). RESULTS: Significantly higher GFAP (median 53.8 vs 25.7 ng/L, P < .001) and UCH-L1 (median 350.9 vs 153.9 ng/L, P < .001) were found in mTBI compared to non-head trauma patients. In mTBI diagnostic sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) for the combination of GFAP and UCH-L1 were 100% and 30.9%, respectively, with area under the curve (AUC) 0.655. GFAP alone yielded Se 85.7%, Sp 41.8%, and AUC 0.638, while UCH-L1 yielded Se 57.1%, Sp 56.4%, and AUC 0.568. In non-head trauma patients, the combination of GFAP and UCH-L1 showed Se 100%, Sp 87.9%, and AUC 0.939, while GFAP alone demonstrated Se 100%, Sp 90.9%, and AUC 0.955. CONCLUSIONS: If these results are reproduced on a larger sample, GFAP and UCH-L1 may reduce CT use in patients with mild neurological symptoms after systemic causes exclusion and neurologist's evaluation.

Brain Expression Levels of Commonly Measured Blood Biomarkers of Neurological Damage Differ with Respect to Sex, Race, and Age.

It is increasingly evident that blood biomarkers have potential to improve the diagnosis and management of both acute and chronic neurological conditions. The most well-studied candidates, and arguably those with the broadest utility, are proteins that are highly enriched in neural tissues and released into circulation upon cellular damage. It is currently unknown how the brain expression levels of these proteins is influenced by demographic factors such as sex, race, and age. Given that source tissue abundance is likely a key determinant of the levels observed in the blood during neurological pathology, understanding such influences is important in terms of identifying potential clinical scenarios that could produce diagnostic bias. In this study, we leveraged existing mRNA sequencing data originating from 2,642 normal brain specimens harvested from 382 human donors to examine potential demographic variability in the expression levels of genes which code for 28 candidate blood biomarkers of neurological damage. Existing mass spectrometry data originating from 26 additional normal brain specimens harvested from 26 separate human donors was subsequently used to tentatively assess whether observed transcriptional variance was likely to produce corresponding variance in terms of protein abundance. Genes associated with several well-studied or emerging candidate biomarkers including neurofilament light chain (NfL), ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase isozyme L1 (UCH-L1), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and synaptosomal-associated protein 25 (SNAP-25) exhibited significant differences in expression with respect to sex, race, and age. In many instances, these differences in brain expression align well with and provide a mechanistic explanation for previously reported differences in blood levels.

Evaluation of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase-L1 Using a Rapid Point of Care Test for Predicting Head Computed Tomography Lesions After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in a Dutch Multi-Center Cohort.

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a common condition seen in emergency departments worldwide. Blood-based biomarkers glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) are recently U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved for the prediction of intracranial lesions on head computed tomography (CT) scans in mTBI. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of GFAP and UCH-L1 in a Dutch cohort using the i-STAT TBI assay. In a multi-center observational study, we enrolled 253 mTBI patients. Head CT scans were scored using the Marshall classification system. Logistic regression models were used to assess the contribution of biomarkers and clinical parameters to diagnostic performance. Detection of UCH-L1 and GFAP resulted in a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 19% for CT positivity in mTBI patients, along with a negative predictive value of 95% (88-100%) and a positive predictive value of 27% (21-33%). Combining biomarker testing with loss of consciousness and time to sample increased specificity to 46%. Combined testing of UCH-L1 and GFAP testing resulted in possibly more unnecessary CT scans compared with GFAP testing alone, with only limited increase in sensitivity. This study confirmed high sensitivity of GFAP and UCH-L1 for CT abnormalities in mTBI patients using the i-STAT TBI test. The results support the potential use of GFAP and UCH-L1 as tools for determining the indication for CT scanning in mTBI patients, possibly offering a cost- and time-effective approach to management of patients with mTBI. Prospective studies in larger cohorts are warranted to validate our findings.

Performance of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) biomarkers in predicting CT scan results and neurological outcomes in children with traumatic brain injury (BRAINI-2 paediatric study): protocol of a European prospective multicentre study.

INTRODUCTION: In light of the burden of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in children and the excessive number of unnecessary CT scans still being performed, new strategies are needed to limit their use while minimising the risk of delayed diagnosis of intracranial lesions (ICLs). Identifying children at higher risk of poor outcomes would enable them to be better monitored. The use of the blood-based brain biomarkers glial fibrillar acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) could help clinicians in this decision. The overall aim of this study is to provide new knowledge regarding GFAP and UCH-L1 in order to improve TBI management in the paediatric population. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a European, prospective, multicentre study, the BRAINI-2 paediatric study, in 20 centres in France, Spain and Switzerland with an inclusion period of 30 months for a total of 2880 children and adolescents included. To assess the performance of GFAP and UCH-L1 used separately and in combination to predict ICLs on CT scans (primary objective), 630 children less than 18 years of age with mild TBI, defined by a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13-15 and with a CT scan will be recruited. To evaluate the potential of GFAP and UCH-L1 in predicting the prognosis after TBI (secondary objective), a further 1720 children with mild TBI but no CT scan as well as 130 children with moderate or severe TBI will be recruited. Finally, to establish age-specific reference values for GFAP and UCH-L1 (secondary objective), we will include 400 children and adolescents with no history of TBI. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received ethics approval in all participating countries. Results from our study will be disseminated in international peer-reviewed journals. All procedures were developed in order to assure data protection and confidentiality. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05413499.

Diagnostic Utility of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Beyond 12 Hours After Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Study.

Blood levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) within 12h of suspected traumatic brain injury (TBI) have been approved by the Food and Drug administration to aid in determining the need for a brain computed tomography (CT) scan. The current study aimed to determine whether this context of use can be expanded beyond 12h post-TBI in patients presenting with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 13-15. The prospective, 18-center Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) study enrolled TBI participants aged ≥17 years who presented to a United States Level 1 trauma center and received a clinically indicated brain CT scan within 24h post-injury, a blood draw within 24h and at 14 days for biomarker analysis. Data from participants with emergency department arrival GCS 13-15 and biomarker values at days 1 and 14 were extracted for the primary analysis. A subgroup of hospitalized participants with serial biomarkers at days 1, 3, 5, and 14 were analyzed, including plasma GFAP and UCH-L1, and serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B). The primary analysis compared biomarker values dichotomized by head CT results (CT+/CT-). Area under receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to determine diagnostic accuracy. The overall cohort included 1142 participants with initial GCS 13-15, with mean age 39.8 years, 65% male, and 73% Caucasian. The GFAP provided good discrimination in the overall cohort at days 1 (AUC = 0.82) and 14 (AUC = 0.72), and in the hospitalized subgroup at days 1 (AUC = 0.84), 3 (AUC = 0.88), 5 (AUC = 0.82), and 14 (AUC = 0.74). The UCH-L1, NSE, and S100B did not perform well (AUC = 0.51-0.57 across time points). This study demonstrates the utility of GFAP to aid in decision-making for diagnostic brain CT imaging beyond the 12h time frame in patients with TBI who have a GCS 13-15.

Admission levels of serum biomarkers have additive and cumulative prognostic value in traumatic brain injury.

Elevated levels of CNS-derived serum proteins are associated with poor outcome in traumatic brain injury (TBI), but the value of adding acute serum biomarker levels to common clinical outcome predictors lacks evaluation. We analyzed admission serum samples for Total-Tau (T-Tau), Neurofilament light chain (Nfl), Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCHL1) in a cohort of 396 trauma patients including 240 patients with TBI. We assessed the independent association of biomarkers with 1-year mortality and 6-12 months Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) score, as well as the additive and cumulative value of biomarkers on Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Marshall Score for outcome prediction. Nfl and T-Tau levels were independently associated with outcome (OR: Nfl = 1.65, p = 0.01; T-Tau = 1.99, p < 0.01). Nfl or T-Tau improved outcome prediction by GCS (Wald Chi, Nfl = 6.8-8.8, p < 0.01; T-Tau 7.2-11.3, p < 0.01) and the Marshall score (Wald Chi, Nfl = 16.2-17.5, p < 0.01; T-Tau 8.7-12.4, p < 0.01). Adding T-Tau atop Nfl further improved outcome prediction in majority of tested models (Wald Chi range 3.8-9.4, p ≤ 0.05). Our data suggest that acute levels of serum biomarkers are independently associated with outcome after TBI and add outcome predictive value to commonly used clinical scores.

Evaluation of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 enzyme levels in patients with epilepsy / Avaliação dos níveis de enzima ubiquitina C-terminal hidrolase-L1 em pacientes com epilepsia

ABSTRACT Objective: Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) enzyme levels were investigated in patients with epilepsy, epileptic seizure, remission period, and healthy individuals. Methods: Three main groups were evaluated, including epileptic seizure, patients with epilepsy in the non-seizure period, and healthy volunteers. The patients having a seizure in the Emergency department or brought by a postictal confusion were included in the epileptic attack group. The patients having a seizure attack or presenting to the Neurology outpatient department for follow up were included in the non-seizure (remission period) group. Results: The UCH-L1 enzyme levels of 160 patients with epilepsy (80 patients with epileptic attack and 80 patients with epilepsy in the non-seizure period) and 100 healthy volunteers were compared. Whereas the UCH-L1 enzyme levels were 8.30 (IQR=6.57‒11.40) ng/mL in all patients with epilepsy, they were detected as 3.90 (IQR=3.31‒7.22) ng/mL in healthy volunteers, and significantly increased in numbers for those with epilepsy (p<0.001). However, whereas the UCH-L1 levels were 8.50 (IQR=6.93‒11.16) ng/mL in the patients with epileptic seizures, they were 8.10 (IQR=6.22‒11.93) ng/mL in the non-seizure period, and no significant difference was detected (p=0.6123). When the UCH-L1 cut-off value was taken as 4.34 mg/mL in Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve analysis, the sensitivity and specificity detected were 93.75 and 66.00%, respectively (AUG=0.801; p<0.0001; 95%CI 0.747‒0.848) for patients with epilepsy. Conclusion: Even though UCH-L1 levels significantly increased more in patients with epilepsy than in healthy individuals, there was no difference between epileptic seizure and non-seizure periods.

RESUMO Objetivo: Níveis da enzima ubiquitina C-terminal hidrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) foram investigados em pacientes com epilepsia, crise epiléptica, período de remissão e indivíduos saudáveis. Método: Foram avaliados três grupos principais, incluindo crise epiléptica, epilepsia no período não convulsivo e voluntários saudáveis. Pacientes com convulsão no departamento de emergência ou trazidos por confusão pós-ictal foram incluídos no grupo de crise epiléptica. Os pacientes que tiveram crise epiléptica ou foram ao ambulatório de Neurologia para acompanhamento foram incluídos no grupo não convulsivo (período de remissão). Resultados: Os níveis da enzima UCH-L1 de 160 pacientes com epilepsia (80 pacientes com crise epiléptica e 80 pacientes com epilepsia no período não convulsivo) e 100 voluntários saudáveis foram comparados. Enquanto os níveis da enzima UCH-L1 foram 8,30 (IQR=6,57‒11,40) ng/mL em todos os pacientes com epilepsia, os níveis detectados foram de 3,90 (IQR=3,31‒7,22) ng/mL em voluntários saudáveis e aumentaram significativamente na epilepsia (p<0,001). No entanto, ao passo que os níveis de UCH-L1 foram 8,50 (IQR=6,93‒11,16) ng/mL nos pacientes com crise epiléptica, foram 8,10 (IQR=6,22‒11,93) ng/mL no período não convulsivo, e nenhuma diferença significativa foi detectada (p=0,6123). Quando o valor de corte de UCH-L1 foi considerado 4,34 mg/mL com base na análise da curva ROC, sensibilidade e especificidade foram detectadas como 93,75 e 66,00%, respectivamente (AUG=0,801; p<0,0001; IC95% 0,747‒0,848) para os pacientes com epilepsia. Conclusão: Embora os níveis de UCH-L1 tenham aumentado significativamente nos pacientes com epilepsia em relação aos indivíduos saudáveis, não foi observada diferença entre crise epiléptica e períodos não convulsivos.