Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effect of respiratory therapist-initiated treatment protocols on patient outcomes and resource utilization.
Kollef, M H; Shapiro, S D; Clinkscale, D; Cracchiolo, L; Clayton, D; Wilner, R; Hossin, L.
Afiliação
  • Kollef MH; Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. mkollef@pulmonary.wustl.edu
Chest ; 117(2): 467-75, 2000 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10669692
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT Physicians frequently prescribe respiratory treatments to hospitalized patients, but the influence of such treatments on clinical outcomes is difficult to assess.

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the clinical outcomes of patients receiving respiratory treatments managed by respiratory care practitioner (RCP)-directed treatment protocols or physician-directed orders.

DESIGN:

A single center, quasi-randomized, clinical study.

SETTING:

Three internal medicine firms from an urban teaching hospital. PATIENTS Six hundred ninety-four consecutive hospitalized non-ICU patients ordered to receive respiratory treatments. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Discordant respiratory care orders, respiratory care charges, hospital length of stay, and patient-specific complications. Discordant orders were defined as written orders for respiratory treatments that were not clinically indicated as well as orders omitting treatments that were clinically indicated according to protocol-based treatment algorithms.

RESULTS:

Firm A patients (n = 239) received RCP-directed treatments and had a statistically lower rate of discordant respiratory care orders (24.3%) as compared with patients receiving physician-directed treatments in firms B (n = 205; 58.5%) and C (n = 250; 56.8%; p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences in patient complications were observed. The average number of respiratory treatments and respiratory care charges were statistically less for firm A patients (10.7 +/- 13.7 treatments; $868 +/- 1,519) as compared with patients in firms B (12.4 +/- 12.7 treatments, $1,124 +/- 1,339) and C (12.3 +/- 13.4 treatments, $1, 054 +/- 1,346; p = 0.009 [treatments] and p < 0.001 [respiratory care charges]).

CONCLUSIONS:

Respiratory care managed by RCP-directed treatment protocols for non-ICU patients is safe and showed greater agreement with institutional treatment algorithms as compared with physician-directed respiratory care. Additionally, the overall utilization of respiratory treatments was significantly less among patients receiving RCP-directed respiratory care.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde / Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente / Terapia Respiratória / Recursos em Saúde / Pneumopatias Obstrutivas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Chest Ano de publicação: 2000 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde / Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente / Terapia Respiratória / Recursos em Saúde / Pneumopatias Obstrutivas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Chest Ano de publicação: 2000 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos